Conference Session

Dimensions of Engineering Literacy and Engineering in General Education

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yuetong Lin, Indiana State University; A. Mehran Shahhosseini, Indiana State University; M. Affan Badar, University of Sharjah & Indiana State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

learningare collaborative learning, co-operative learning, and problem-based learning. Various studies,from using interactive, hands-on lessons and activities designed to teach research process toundergraduate engineering students 1 , to preparing manufacturing engineering students throughcompetitions, projects sponsored by industry, capstone projects, laboratory exercises or projectssimulating real-life scenarios 2 , have shown that active learning increases student performance inSTEM subjects.Critical thinking, identified by The U. S. Department of Labor as the raw material of a number ofkey workplace skills such as problem solving, decision making, organizational planning, and riskmanagement, is highly coveted by employers of engineering graduates

Conference Session

Dimensions of Engineering Literacy and Engineering in General Education

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mani Mina, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

should be a clear line for the students that literacy is notcapability, is it the know how.The following are highlights of 4 retired and established faculty in engineering who were kind toshare their thoughts. They have extensive experience trying to understand engineering andtechnology, and also trying to train students. Some of the faculty mentioned that in 70’s theycreated seminars and activities to reach out the non-engineering students. Q1: What is Tech lit? a. A technologically literate person is able to read articles in magazines such as Scientific American, Discovery, and Science News and understand perhaps 20% to 50% of it b. Should be able to intelligently discuss technological information with other people with

Conference Session

Promoting Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janet L. Gbur, Case Western Reserve University; Daniela Solomon, Case Western Reserve University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

Workshop should have less speakers Other (please specifiy)Figure 2. Results from the panelist survey based on how the event could be improvedThe results of the attendee survey mirrored the panelists’ responses on the organization andlength of the workshop again noting that it was a well-organized event and the length wasappropriate, though a small percentage felt the event was somewhat long. In addition to thesequestions, the attendees were also asked to reflect on their thoughts regarding workshop content,suggestions for future events, if they would consider attending again and most importantly thebenefit(s) from attendance.The attendees overwhelmingly replied that the topic was of interest to them and that some

Conference Session

Experience in Assessing Technological Literacy

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Claire L. Antaya, Arizona State University; Kristen Parrish PhD, Arizona State University; Elizabeth A Adams P.E., Chandler Gilbert Community College; Amy E. Landis, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

water, water footprint, water-in-energy) X X to develop MATLAB function to solve for water footprint (MCC ONLY) X X to graph and compare the results from different online water footprint tools (ASU ONLY) X to contrast differences between online water footprint tools and justify which tool(s) account most realistically account for virtual water footprints (ASU ONLY) X XWater-for-energy

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tejita Rajbhandari, Gannon University; Mark Blair, Gannon University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

incapable of learning or discerningfact from fiction without the assistance of an intellectually superior individual to teach them ordumb-down the material through parables or simplified rules. Patrick Quin describes Aquinas’Super de Trin.2.4 “that theological truth is best transmitted to the faithful in parabolic form… itmight, he thinks, confuse the uneducated who would misunderstand it and be ridiculed byunbelievers who detest it anyway” [10]. Aquinas states: “…it is said in Luke 8:10, ‘To you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God, but to the rest in parables.’ Therefore one ought by obscurity in speech conceal the sacred truths from the multitude” (Pars 1 q. 2 a. 4 s. c. 3). “…the words of a teacher ought

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

how best the curriculum might be changed, tobetter meet this goal. Given Mina’s criticism of engineering students that they are nottechnologically literate, higher education might begin with a general programme of liberaleducation as suggested by Heywood. That model through problem based/project learningprovides a range of contexts that, should in principle, deal with the problem of control indifferent contexts. But, as Cheville recognises this is becoming increasingly difficult becauseof the tension between the increasing gap between technological and educational capability.He suggests that we should all master some (rather than many) aspect(s) of episteme andtechne, and we should learn to teach that aspect within “communities in which

Conference Session

Non-Canonical Canons of Engineering Ethics

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Donna M Riley, Virginia Tech; Yanna Lambrinidou, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

urges practitioners to avoid causing harm. 3Indeed, responsibility to hold an ideal paramount is substantively different from responsibility topromote the same ideal. For example, teachers, pilots, and doctors must all hold paramount thehealth and safety of the individuals in their charge, but among them only doctors must dedicatetheir work to the promotion of these individuals’ health and safety. The American MedicalAssociation’s (AMA) Code of Medical Ethics states that physicians are obliged to provide“competent medical care, with compassion and respect for human dignity and rights.”4 TheAmerican Bar Association’s (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct urge lawyers tofunction as “representative[s] of clients, [officers] of the legal system

Conference Session

Developing Technological Literacy in Students

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Justin Lee Clough, University of Southern California; Patricia Chaffey, University of Southern California; Gautam Salhotra, University of Southern California; Colin G. Cess, University of Southern California; Rey Pocius, University of Southern California; Katie Mills, University of Southern California

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

Margolis and colleagues demonstrated in2010 that an unnamed high school in east Los Angeles, near or in the Boyle Heights region, hadsufficient computer technology but lacked CS courses that required critical thinking. SinceMargolis et al.’s landmark study, LAUSD has made progress in addressing this disparity. In 2016,LAUSD’s Instructional Technology (IT) Task Force recommended “[p]rofessional learningopportunities for all stakeholders [are] imperative to educate leaders on how to incorporate digitallearning tools and how to adapt instruction to the opportunities afforded by digital tools” 11 . Since2019, LAUSD has become the first district in the nation to adopt ISTE Student Standards and tojoin forces with California Emerging Technology Fund for

Conference Session

Promoting Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James W Malazita, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Dominic Francis Gelfuso; Dean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

backgrounds andinterests.References  [1] Gustin, S. (2011). “Democratizing Design: Autodesk’s CEO Carl Bass Announces 123D.” Wired. First published May 3, 2011. Last accessed 1/20/2016 at http://www.wired.com/2011/05/democratizing-design/[2] Editors. “adidas Futurecraft: The Ultimate 3D-Printed Personalized Shoe.” Materialize. Last accessed 1/20/2016 at http://www.materialise.com/cases/adidas-futurecraft-the-ultimate-3d-printed-personalized-shoe[3] Florida, R. (2012). The Rise of the Creative Class. Basic Books.[4] Cavalcanti, G. (2013). “Making Makerspaces: Creating a Business Model.” Make. Published June 4, 2013. Last accessed 2/1/16 at http://makezine.com/2013/06/04/making-makerspaces-creating-a-business-model/[5

Conference Session

The Philosophy of Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Heywood, Trinity College, Dublin

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

retention of the concept(s) taught.Neither Trevelyan or Carberry and Ohland discuss what preparation in pedagogy might beuseful in preparing students to teach although for some peer tutoring the students are givetraining and paid. It is argued here that substantial prior training may lead to more effectivelearning exchanges irrespective of whether it is undertaken as a tutor with one or twostudents, perhaps in a cooperative learning group, or as an instructor with a class of twentystudents.However, this brings into question the role that educational studies may have more generallyin engineering programmes.It is argued that students may benefit more if they have to teach an unfamiliar subject and thetraining may be linked to the preparation

Conference Session

The Philosophy of Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; John Heywood, Trinity CollegeDublin, The University of Dublin

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

through social sciences is as real as how thesocial sciences understand society. Thus engineering education’s framing of issues as problemsmay serve to create an engineering education system that gives rise to, or exacerbates, thoseperceived problems. For example if it is widely believed there is a significant retention problemin engineering a possible solution would be to create a new first year course to better prepare1 In the late 1920’s a group of investigators from Harvard University were able to observe people at work in theWestinghouse Electrical Company’s works in Chicago. It was found that productivity increased among someworkers when the conditions of work had been changed for the worse with the expectation that productivity

Conference Session

The Philosophy of Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William R. Loendorf, Eastern Washington University; Jason K Durfee P.E. P.E., Eastern Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

). Technology education and other technically related programs. In G.E. Martin (Ed.), Foundations of technology education, 44thYearbook of the Council on Technology Teacher Education (pp. 25- 117). New York, NY: Glencoe McGraw-Hill.8. Johnson, S., Gostelow, J. P., & King, W.J. (2000). Engineering and Society, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.9. Loendorf, W. R. (2004). A Course Investigating Technology in World Civilization. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, June 20-23, 2004.10. Loendorf, W. R. (2010). The Social, Economic, and Political Impact of Technology: An Historical Perspective. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy-Philosophy of Engineering (TELPhe) Division Technical Session 3 / Perspectives on Advances in Promoting Technological Literacy

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jayanta Kumar Banerjee, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

; Productivity Press, Norwalk (Connecticut). 8. Banerjee, J.; The Gap Management; Journal of Computer and Industrial Engineering; 1997, v. 33, n. 1 - 2, pp. 173 – 178. 9. Dewey, J.; Experience and Education (60th Anniversary edition); 1998; Delta, Kappa, Pi; West Lafayette (Indiana). 10. Kuhn, T. S.; The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Encyclopedia of Unified Sciences); 1962; University of Chicago Press. 11. Banerjee, J.; “Integration of Mechanical Properties of Materials in an Undergraduate Course on Manufacturing Processes for both Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Students”; ASEE Annual Convention ( virtual), June 2020.12. Reif, R.; Tech Day Presidential Welcome Speech;2014; Massachusetts

Conference Session

Engineering Literacy: Champions of Engineering in General Education

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maria E. Garlock, Princeton University; Aatish Bhatia, Princeton University; Evelyn Hanna Laffey, Princeton University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

effective inleveling the playing field. In the example of the course presented in this paper, survey resultsshow great gains in learning as enabled by active learning, and great gains in attitude (e.g.,enthusiasm for the subject).AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant no.:1432426. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] ASEE (2012). “The Green Report – Engineering Education for a Changing World”,American Society for Engineering Education. https://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/The-Green-Report.pdf[2] NAE

Conference Session

Developing Technological Literacy in Students

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Neelam Prabhu Gaunkar, Iowa State University; Mani Mina, Iowa State University of Science and Technology

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

. "Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking."Teachers college record 104, no. 4 (2002): 842-866.[12]. Prabhu Gaunkar, Neelam and Mani Mina. “ Developing self-awareness in learningpractices: Designing and implementing a survival tool for freshmen in engineering .” InProceedings of the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2018.https://peer.asee.org/30312[13]. Bowden, John A., and Eleanor Walsh. "Phenomenography." Phenomenography (2000): v.[14]. Åkerlind, Gerlese S. "Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods."Higher Education Research & Development 31, no. 1 (2012): 115-127.[15]. Entwistle, Noel. “Introduction: Phenomenography in higher education.” Higher EducationResearch & Development

Conference Session

Exploration of Broad Issues and Promotion of Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Joseph F. Camean P.E., U.S. Coast Guard Academy

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

: “Increasingly the United States is seen globally as an important leader rather than the uncontested leader.”and “. . . the United States is playing a less dominant role in many areas of S&E activity.”Our future rests with today’s undergraduate engineers, who are initiated to the professionthrough coursework in science, mathematics and engineering fundamentals. In the not toodistant past, the fundamentals included a fair amount of engineering technology. Many oftoday’s four year engineering programs disdain the technical side of engineering, openly criticalthat their curricula are assuredly not a technology program; favoring instead a more extensivefocus on derivation and theoretical work with expected continuity into graduate level

Conference Session

Defining and Refining Technological and Engineering Literacy

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Krupczak, Hope College; Gregory Bassett

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

(2003).5. Goldman, S. L “Why we need a philosophy of engineering: a work in progress.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 29, (2), 163 – 176 (2004).6. Heywood, J., R. McGrann, and K.A. Smith, “Continuing the FIE2007 Conversation on: Can philosophy of engineering education improve the practice of engineering education?” 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 22-25, 2008, Saratoga Springs, NY.7. Heywood, J., “Screening curriculum aims and objectives using the philosophy of education,” 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 22-25, 2008, Saratoga Springs, NY.8. Heywood, J., “A historical overview of recent developments in the search for a philosophy of engineering education,” 41st

Conference Session

Engineering and Technological Literacy: Past and Future

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Krupczak, Hope College; John W. Blake P.E., Austin Peay State University; Kate A. Disney, Mission College; Carl O. Hilgarth, Shawnee State University; Randy Libros, Community College of Philadelphia; Mani Mina, Iowa State University; Steven R. Walk, Old Dominion University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.Bibliography 1. Technically speaking: Why all Americans need to know more about technology, Greg Pearson and A. Thomas Young, editors, National Academies Press, (2002). 2. E. D. Hirsch and James S. Trefil, Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know, Random House, (1987). 3. Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improving the Public Understanding of Engineering, Committee on Public Understanding of Engineering Messages, National Academies Press, (2008). 4. Heywood, J., “Engineering Literacy: A Component of Liberal Education” Proceeding of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2009

Conference Session

Technological Literacy

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William R. Loendorf, Eastern Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

also invented analternative to tables, where the logarithm values were carved on ivory sticks which are nowcalled Napier's Bones. A modern set of Napier's BonesNapier's invention led directly to the slide rule, first built in England in 1632 and still in use inthe 1960's by the NASA engineers of the Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo programs which landedmen on the moon. A 1960s slide ruleSlide rules added logarithms to perform multiplication and contained up to 22 different scales Page 22.395.6that were used for various mathematical functions like square root, sine, cosine

Conference Session

New Approaches and Applications to Enhance Technological Literacy - Part I

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alicia L Lyman-Holt, Oregon State University; Laia Cari Robichaux, Oregon State University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

questions. While this activity may not be able to reach millions of people a year, itcan reach to reach 1000s. To reach many different audiences we need activities of different scaleand scope. This activity has proven meaningful in a medium-scale festival event.Referencesi “NSF’s Goals...Setting a True Course”, n.d., http://www.nsf.gov/nsf/nsfpubs/straplan/goals.htm.ii Y. Chae, S. Purzer, and M. Cardella, “Core Concepts for Engineering Literacy: The Interrelationships AmongSTEM Disciplines,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Louisville,KY, 2010.iii J.H. Falk, M. Storksdieck, and L.D. Dierking, “Investigating Public Science Interest and Understanding: Evidencefor the Importance of Free-choice

Conference Session

Interactive Panel on Perspectives and Practical Skills for Men as Advocates for Gender Equity

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lawrence J. Genalo, Iowa State University; Roger A. Green, North Dakota State University; Beth M Holloway, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Archie L Holmes Jr., University of Virginia; Brian P Kirkmeyer, Miami University; Klod Kokini, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Daniel Lopresti, Lehigh University; Adrienne Minerick, Michigan Technological University; Beena Sukumaran, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division, Minorities in Engineering, Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering, Women in Engineering

et al.’s 2012 PNAS paper (Science Faculty’s Subtle GenderBiases Favor Male Students)8 and Sheltzera and Smith’s 2104 PNAS paper (Elite Male Facultyin the Life Sciences Employ Fewer Women)9.Dr. Kirkmeyer: I cannot honestly say I have considered what strategies to use to help othersbecome aware of these issues, because they are situation-dependent and usually reactive. Ipersonally use humor and self-deprecation to address many issues in a non-threatening manner,and so I know I have done so with these. The reality is that it depends on the context of thesituation related to these issues. In some situations, humor (and particularly sarcasm) hasworked quite well in making others aware of how these issues are being perceived by othersaround them

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy-Philosophy of Engineering (TELPhe) Division Technical Session 3 / Perspectives on Advances in Promoting Technological Literacy

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sayyad Zahid Qamar, Sultan Qaboos University; Ramanathan Arunachalam, Sultan Qaboos University; Sayyad Basim Qamar, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluatinginformation gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, orcommunication, as a guide to belief and action.” In simpler words, CT involves the three majorskills of analysis, synthesis, and evaluation which are the higher order thinking skills accordingto Bloom’s Taxonomy [9]. A more general and rudimentary definition of CT was coined by Qiao[10], proposing that critical thinking is the same as “scientific thinking.” This instinctivelyredirects us to what is known as the “scientific method” [11] that consists of the well-knownsteps: define a question; gather relevant information; form an explanatory hypothesis; conductexperiment/s to test the hypothesis

Conference Session

The Philosophy of Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Krupczak, National Science Foundation; Mani Mina, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

, (1996). Page 26.1748.13 16. McCabe, Warren L., Julian C. Smith, Peter Harriott, Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering, 7th Edition, McGraw-Hill (2005). 1217. Merritt, Frederick S., M. Kent Loftin, Jonathan T. Ricketts, Standard Handbook for Civil Engineers, 4th Edition, Mc-Graw Hill, New York (1996).18. Systems Engineering Fundamentals, Department of Defense, Systems Management College, Defense Acquisition University Press, January (2001).19. Shishko, Robert., et al., NASA Systems Engineering Handbook, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, SP

Conference Session

Curriculum Development in Technological Literacy

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Mysore Narayanan, Miami University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

using a median or a mode (not a mean). The mode is probably the most suitable for easy interpretation. • • • Express variability in terms of the range or inter quartile range. Standard Deviation can’t be used. • • • • • • • • • Display the distribution of observations in a dot plot or a bar chart. It can’t be a histogram, because the data is not continuous.APPENDIX B: Five–Point Likert Scale. Rubrics courtesy of W. S. U., Pullman, WA. 5 Has demonstrated excellence. Has analyzed important data precisely. Has provided documentation. Has answered key questions correctly. Evidence of

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Wayne Freeman P.E., U.S. Coast Guard Academy; J. Alex Birdwell, Northwestern University; Emma Tevaarwerk, Northwestern University; Ken Gentry, Northwestern University; Ordel Brown, Northwestern University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

demonstration of the prototype to an audience thatincludes the client, users, faculty, staff, students and community at the Fall or Winter DesignExpo. These Expos are part of the Design Institute’s Fall and Winter Expos that showcase thework of students in multiple Graduate and Undergraduate design courses and clubs. The DTC2presentation involves a demonstration of the prototype to a smaller audience including theclient, user(s) and other teams that are working on the same project. Unlike DTC1, DTC2projects are distributed to one team per section and across two to four sections. In both DTC1and 2 presenting is an opportunity for students to develop an appreciation for how much theirtechnological and engineering literacy on a specific topic has changed

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Neelam Prabhu Gaunkar, Iowa State University; Mani Mina, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

” 2015. Published by Technological and Engineering Literacy andPhilosophy of Engineering (TELPhE), Division of American society of Engineering Education.[11]. Mina, Mani, John Cowan, and John Heywood. "Case for Reflection in EngineeringEducation- and an Alternative." 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 10 2015.doi:10.1109/fie.2015.7344252.[12]. Adams, Robin S., Jennifer Turns, and Cynthia J. Atman. "Educating effective engineeringdesigners: The role of reflective practice." Design studies 24, no. 3 (2003): 275-294.[13]. Prabhu Gaunkar, Neelam, Melissa Rands, and Mani Mina. "Variations in Student Learningin an Inquiry-based Freshmen Electrical Engineering Course." 2017 IEEE Frontiers inEducation Conference (FIE), 10 2017. doi

Conference Session

Defining and Refining Technological and Engineering Literacy

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen T Frezza, Gannon University; Richard W. Moodey, Gannon University; David Arthur Nordquest, Gannon University; Krishnakishore Pilla P.E., Gannon University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

as Science, a survey of CompetingViewpoints".14. The computer scientist as toolsmith II. Brooks, F. P. Jr. 3, March 1996, Communications ofthe ACM, Vol. 39, pp. 61-68.15. Computing is a Natural Science. Denning, Peter. 7, July 2007, Communications of theACM, Vol. 50, pp. 13-18.16. A New Framework for Computer Science and Engineering. Rosenbloom, Paul. 2004, IEEEComputer, pp. 31-36.17. Colburn, T. R. Philosophy and Computer Science. Armonk, NY : M. E. Sharpe, 2000.18. Kahlil, H. Levy and L. S. The Academic Image of Computer Science. ACM SIGCSEBulliten. 1978, Vol. 10, 2, pp. 31-33.19. Fletcher, P. The role of experiments in computer science. Journal of Systems and Software.1995, Vol. 30, 1-2, pp. 161-163.20. Computer Science: Is It Really the

Conference Session

Objectives, Assessment, and Methods for Teaching Technological Literacy

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steve Macho, Buffalo State College; Su Wang, China National Institute for Educational Research

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

, and identify effective strategies.  Attempt a truly open ended design experience for teachers; and observe subsequent results with students.  Seek to establish collaborative teaching efforts with existing teachers and programs that already teach creativity; e.g., bring Art and STEM teachers together to lead students in an open ended design experience.  Continue to promote international exchange of educators who have experience with the use of design at all levels of education (K-20).Bibliography 1. Macho, S. (2010). American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE): K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division, AC 2010-2063, and

Conference Session

The Philosophy of Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan Cheville, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

Conference Session

Promoting Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Krupczak Jr, NSF Division of Undergraduate Education; Mani Mina, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

, Autumn 2002, pp 221-2218. 11. Bloom, Benjamin S., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive Domain. Longman, New York (1956). 12. Sosniak, Lauren A. Bloom's Taxonomy: A Forty Year Retrospective. Lorin W. Anderson, editor, University of Chicago Press, 1994. 13. Anderson, Lorin W., David R. Krathwohl, and Benjamin Samuel Bloom. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Allyn & Bacon, 2001. 14. Wilson, Leslie., The Second Principle: Anderson and Krathwohl – Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised, http://thesecondprinciple.com/teaching-essentials/beyond-bloom-cognitive-taxonomy-revised/ (Accessed March 20, 2016). 15