Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristina Rigden, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Mariappan Jawaharlal, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Nicole Gutzke, Cal Poly Pomona

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

-framework [Accessed December 11, 2019].[4] J. Dewey, “How we think,” 1910. [Online]. Available: http://rci.rutgers.edu/~tripmcc/phil/dewey-hwt-pt1-selections.pdf [Accessed December 7, 2019].[5] B. S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman, 1956.[6] Resource Area for Teaching, “Bridging the engagement gap with hands-on teaching,” 2013.[Online]. Available: from http://www.raft.net/public/pdfs/case-for-hands-on-learning.pdf [AccessedDecember 8, 2019].[7] P. Goertz, “10 signs of a 21st century classroom,” Edutopia: George Lucas EducationalFoundation, February 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.edutopia.org/discussion/10-signs-21st-century-classroom [Accessed December 7, 2019].[8] K. Gary, “Project-Based Learning,” IEEE

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cristina Poleacovschi, Iowa State University; Scott Grant Feinstein, Iowa State University; Stephanie Luster-Teasley, North Carolina A&T State University; Meghan Berger M.A., North Carolina A & T State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Black Professors’ Experiences with and Responses to Racism and Racial Climate.”American Journal of Education 117, no. 4 (August 2011): 495–526. https://doi.org/10.1086/660756.Rasmussen, Brian, and Daniel Salhani. “A Contemporary Kleinian Contribution to UnderstandingRacism.” Social Service Review 84, no. 3 (September 2010): 491–513. https://doi.org/10.1086/656401.Basford, Tessa E., Lynn R. Offermann, and Tara S. Behrend. “Do You See What I See? Perceptions ofGender Microaggressions in the Workplace.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 38, no. 3 (September2014): 340–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313511420.Elsass, Priscilla M, and Laura M Graves. “Demographic Diversity in Decision-Making Groups: TheExperiences of Women and People of Color,” n.d

Conference Session

WIED: Pre-College Student Experiences

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jane Andrews, Aston University; Robin Clark P.E., Aston University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Accessed: 12/3/1429. National Academy of Engineering (2007) Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic Science and engineering. Washington. NAE & National Academy of Science. Cheltenham. UK. Edward Elgar.30. Burke, R.J. & Mattis, M.C. (2007). Women and Minorities in Science, Technology, Engineering & Maths. Cheltenham. Edward Elgar.31. Bell, A.E., Spencer, S.J., Iserman, E., LOGEL, C.E. R. (2003). “Stereotype Threat and Women’s Performance in Engineering”. Journal of Engineering Education. October. pp. 307-312.32. Bell, S. (2009). Women in Science in Australia. Federation of Australian Science & Technological Societies. Australia.33. Hørby, M., Madsen L., Dahms M

Conference Session

History of the Women in Engineering Division: Reflections from Past Chairs of the Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Beena Sukumaran, Rowan University; Janet Callahan, Boise State University; Donna C. Llewellyn, Boise State University; Beth M. Holloway, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Noel N. Schulz, Washington State University; Sarah A. Rajala, Iowa State University; Donna Reese, Mississippi State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

, 2018 Paper ID #21397 Honorary Society), Tau Beta Pi (Engineering Honor Society), the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), the Society of Women Engineers and the National Society of Black Engineers.Dr. Sarah A Rajala, Iowa State University Sarah A. Rajala is professor and James L. and Katherine S. Melsa Dean of Engineering at Iowa State University. Previously, she served as professor, dean of engineering and department head at Mississippi State University, and associate dean and professor at North Carolina State University. She received her B.S. degree in electrical engineering from Michigan Technological

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

H. Paige Brown, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Allison Godwin, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

would also like to acknowledge Moses Olayemi,Jacki Rohde, and Dr. Monique Ross for their feedback and support.References[1] N. A. Fouad and R. Singh, “Stemming the tide: Why women leave engineering,” Department of Energy, 2011 [Online] Available: https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/NSF_Stemming%20the%20Tide%20Why%20W omen%20Leave%20Engineering.pdf. [Accessed: Sep. 4, 2018][2] K. Buse, D. Bilimoria, and S. Perelli, “Why they stay: women persisting in US engineering careers,” Career Development International, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 139-154, 2013.[3] P. Brown, Conqueror: A black woman’s guide to conquering challenges in the workplace. Washington, DC: Paige Brown, 2018.[4] R. M. Rincon and N. Yates, “Women of

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Andrea Nana Ofori-Boadu, North Carolina A&T State University; Victor Ofori-Boadu, Penuel Consult Inc.; Jacob Randall Vanderpool, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University; Dongyang Deng, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

work supported by the National ScienceFoundation under Grant No. (NSF 1845979). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Support was also provided by Ms. CarolineCarpenter, the President of East Coast Construction Services and Executive Member of thePiedmont Chapter of the National Association of Women in Construction (NAWIC).ReferencesAssociation of American Colleges and Universities, “Facts and Figures: The income gaps inhigher education enrollment and completion,” AAC&U News – Insights in Campus Innovationsand Liberal Education, June/July 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.aacu.org/aacu

Conference Session

K-12 Programs for Recruiting Women

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jan DeWaters, Clarkson University; Susan Powers, Clarkson University; Mary Graham, Clarkson University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

programs.[8] Onceenrolled, women are more likely than their male counterparts to complete a science/engineeringprogram rather than dropping out or switching to a different major.[7, 9] Still, the fraction of allengineering degrees awarded to women has remained at or below 20 percent since the mid1990’s, and recent enrollment data indicate that these stable patterns are not expected to changein the near future.[4, 5]The science and engineering gender gap has more to do with perceptions and beliefs than it doeswith achievement levels.[7, 8] According to data from the College Board,[10-12] with fewexceptions, sex differences in high school math and science achievement levels and courseselection are by now minimal, yet differences in SET college and

Conference Session

Issues of Outreach and Interest in Engineering

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Meagan C Pollock, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. Duffy, R. and W. Sedlacek, What is most important to students' long-term career choices: analyzing 10- year trends and group differences. Journal of Career Development, 2009. 34(2): p. 149-163.15. Ros, M., S. Schwartz, and S. Surkiss, Basic individual values, work values, and the meaning of work. Page 23.544.16 Applied psychology, 1999. 48(1): p. 49-71.16. Nosek, B., et al., National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009. 106(26): p. 10593.17. Dweck, C. and E.L. Leggett, A

Conference Session

Faculty Career Development

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jenna P. Carpenter, Louisiana Tech University; D. Patrick O'Neal, Louisiana Tech University; Lori L. Bakken, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Knowledge Center(http://www.wepanknowledgecenter.org) is another excellent source of material, researchreports, initiatives and organizations pertinent to women in STEM. The National Academy ofEngineering’s Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CASEE), in conjunctionwith the Society of Women Engineers (SWE)’s Assessing Women in Engineering (AWE) Page 25.932.10Project, is producing its Advancing Research into Practice (ARP) series, which translatesresearch findings on many these issues into practical recommendations for use in the classroom(http://www.engr.psu.edu/awe/ARPResources.aspx). Lastly, all of the professional

Conference Session

Focus on Faculty

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University; Anita Grierson, AZ State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

academic year. This successful program ran from 2003-2008 with76 students and over a 92% retention and graduation rate in engineering and computerscience. Diversity was an emphasis and 65% of the students in the program were eitherfemale or an underrepresented minority.13 In particular, 29 (38.2%) of the transferstudents were women. This percentage is much higher than the current 18.2% of womenenrolled. For more information on these programs see references 4-13.The CIRC/METS program continues with an NSF S-STEM grant (#0836050), so thecontinuing students, from the first CIRC/METS program, when it ended are now beingsupported in a second CIRC/METS program with $4,000 scholarships per year. When aCIRC/METS student graduates and continues full-time

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. Paper AC 2008-2313.3. Canney, N.E. 2013. Assessing Engineering Students’ Understanding of Personal and Professional Social Responsibility. Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Civil, Environmental, & Architectural Engineering. University of Colorado Boulder.4. Cejka, M.A., A.H. Eagly 1999. Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, April.5. Cerinsek, G., T. Hribar, N. Glodez, S. Dolinsek. 2013. Which are my future career priorities and what influenced my choice of studying science, technology, engineering or mathematics? Some insights on educational choice – case

Conference Session

WIED Olio

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jenna P. Carpenter, Louisiana Tech University; D. Patrick O'Neal, Louisiana Tech University; Lori L. Bakken, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

://www.advance.latech.edu) and our OWISE Graduate Student Seminars focus on re-packaging these resources for a graduate student audience(http://www.latech.edu/coes/owise_seminar).In addition to the materials developed for this project, there are other excellent resources. Theseinclude the ADVANCE Portal (www.portal.advance.vt.edu), which contains materials developedby and posted on ADVANCE project websites across the country, and the WEPAN KnowledgeCenter (http://www.wepanknowledgecenter.org), another excellent source of material, researchreports, initiatives and organizations pertinent to women in STEM. The National Academy ofEngineering’s Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CASEE), in conjunctionwith the Society of Women Engineers (SWE)’s

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark M. Budnik, Valparaiso University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

0 0 0Electrical 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 2Mechanical 1 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 6 2Double Major 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0ECE + METotal 1 0 6 0 2 10 4 0 3 0 7 4For example, instead of working on one FMEA document for two weeks, students can developsubsets of different FMEAs over a 3-hour period. This gives students an opportunity to receiveimmediate feedback from the faculty member. ECE490’s curriculum and classroomenvironment are specifically designed to provide a safe space for students to try, and sometimesfail

Conference Session

Focus on Under-Represented Women

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lupita Montoya, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Cleopatria Martinez, Phoenix College

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

fraction of these degrees. These numbers increased from 640 in 1990 to 1250 in 1998.1There is no further break down of data to look at how Chicanas (or Mexican Americans), inparticular, fair in this scheme.At the Master’s level, Hispanic women earned 48 percent of the total master’s degrees awardedto all Hispanics.1 At the Doctoral level, Hispanics earned 468 of the Science and Engineeringdoctoral degrees awarded in 1990 and 688 of those awarded in 1999. They comprised 4 percentof the S&E doctorate recipients in 1999, up from 3 percent in 1990. Coincidentally, the youngestof the contributors to this book, Dr. Montoya, received her doctorate in Civil and EnvironmentalEngineering in 1999, becoming the first Chicana in her department to receive a

Conference Session

Panel: Effecting Change in Higher Education

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Priscilla Nelson, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Theresa Hunt, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Cherrice Traver, Union College; Pamela Eibeck, Texas Tech; Zulma Toro-Ramos, Wichita State University; Cheryl Schrader, Boise State University; Mary Roth, Lafayette College; delcie durham, University of South Florida

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Conference Session

Issues of Persistence in Engineering

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peggy Meszaros, Virginia Tech; Catherine Amelink, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

AC 2009-213: A CROSS-INSTITUTIONAL COMPARISON OF EDUCATIONALFACTORS PROMOTING OR DISCOURAGING THE INTENT TO REMAIN INENGINEERINGPeggy Meszaros, Virginia Tech Peggy S. Meszaros is the William E. Lavery Professor of Human Development and Director of the research Center for Information Technology Impacts on Children, Youth, and Families at Virginia Tech.Catherine Amelink, Virginia Tech Catherine serves as the Assessment Coordinator for the Division of Student Affairs at Virginia Tech. Page 14.23.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 A Cross-Institutional Comparison of Educational

Conference Session

International and Sustainability Perspectives and Women in Engineering

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela Bielefeldt, University of Colorado-Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

selection of examplesand case studies that highlight humanitarian aid linked to a wide variety of engineeringdisciplines. The Engineers Without Borders – USA website (www.ewb-usa.org) containsinformation on many of these types of projects. As the EDC program continues to evolve at theUniversity of Colorado at Boulder, further efforts will be made to gather data support or refutethe benefits of EDC in attracting and retaining women in engineering.AcknowledgmentsThis material is partially based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. 0431947. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ali Ahmad, Northwestern State University; Jerie Pedescleaux, Northwestern State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

engineers in the workplaces remains relatively low. There has been a significantimprovement compared to the 1980's, during which only about 5.8% of engineers were woman,but the numbers remain relatively low with female engineers only making up about 14% of theengineering workforce within the United States. Suggested reasons for this phenomena includelack of female role models and young women having fewer technological problem solvingopportunities throughout K-12 than when compared to their male counterparts13.To attempt to combat the lack of female engineering students within an Engineering Technologydepartment at a University of Louisiana, the department developed a “Girls Who Draft”program, which is partially motivated by the Girls Who Code

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pradeep Kashinath Waychal, Western Michigan University; Charles Henderson, Western Michigan University ; Daniel Collier, Western Michigan University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

most currentresearch in a given field of research, or historical reviews that present the development in a givenfield of research over time9. Our review belongs in the historical category as we have includedpapers from 1993.Strategize SearchDatabase We review papers from ASEE (American Society of Engineering Education)’s Journal ofEngineering Education (JEE) (ISSN 2168-9830), a primary publication choice for engineeringeducation researchers, especially in the US10. Pawley et al.11 argue that JEE is the flagship andthe most highly ranked journal of the American engineering education researcher community andchose it for their gender research review that identifies dominant themes and patterns in thestructure of gender research. JEE is

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James A. Coller, University of Michigan; Magel P. Su, University of Michigan; Robin Fowler, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(1):59–77, 2015. [5] John Short, Ederyn Williams, and Bruce Christie. The social psychology of telecommunications. 1976. [6] Yong Zhao. The effects of anonymity on computer-mediated peer review. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 4(4):311–345, 1998. [7] Terry Connolly, Leonard M Jessup, and Joseph S Valacich. Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management science, 36(6):689–703, 1990. [8] Robin R Fowler. Talking teams: Increased equity in participation in online compared to face-to-face team discussions. ASEE Computers in Education Journal, 6(1):21–44, 2015. [9] Laura Hirshfield and Milo D Koretsky. Gender and

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Development Opportunities for Diverse Engineering Students

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jenni Buckley, University of Delaware; Amy Trauth, University of Delaware; Manuela Restrepo Parra; Laura Meszaros Dearolf, The Perry Initiative ; Lisa L Lattanza MD

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering

orthopaedists? American Academy ofOrthopardic Surgeons. http://www.aaos.org/news/aaosnow6. AAOS Department of Research and Affairs. Orthopaedic Practice in the US 2014.7. ACGME Data Resource Book 2013-2014. Orthopaedic Residency Statistics. Availableat.http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/tabid/259/Publications/GraduateMedicalEducationDataResourceBook.aspx8. Lattanza L, Dearolf L, O’Connor M, Ladd A, Bucha A, Trauth-Nare A, Buckley JM. ThePerry Initiative: Building a Diverse Talent Pipeline in Orthopaedics. Clinical OrthopaedicsRelated Research. In Press.9. Baldwin K, Namdari S, Bowers A, Keenan MA, Levin LS, Ahn J. Factors affecting interest inorthopedics among female medical students: a prospective analysis. Orthopedics. 2011Dec;34(12):e919-32. Epub 2011

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Keith J Bowman, Illinois Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

SREB-member states(Doctoral dissertation, TEXAS A&MUNIVERSITY-COMMERCE).San Jose State University (2015) https://bcme.sjsu.edu/BME%204%20Year%20PlanThe Economist (2012) “One State Two Systems”, August 11, 2012http://www.economist.com/node/21560290THECB (2014) Closing the Gaps 2014 Progress Reporthttp://www.thecb.state.tx.us/reports/PDF/5924.PDF?CFID=20361408&CFTOKEN=17353582THECB (2015)http://www.txhighereddata.org/Interactive/Institutionsshow.cfm?Type=1&Level=1Tienda, Marta and Sullivan, Teresa, (2015) “Texas Higher Education Opportunity Project”http://texastop10.princeton.edu/project.pdf, http://theop.princeton.edu/US Census (2015) http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.htmlZweben, S., & Bizot, B. (2014). 2013 Taulbee

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division: Faculty and Gender Issues

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Coleen Carrigan, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo; Eve A. Riskin, University of Washington; Kathleen O'Leary, University of Washington; Joyce Yen, University of Washington; Priti N. Mody-Pan, University of Washington; Matthew O'Donnell, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

, K. (2007). Doctorate Recipients from United StatesUniversities: Summary Report 2006. Chicago, IL.4. Martin B., & Hanington BM. (2012) Universal Methods of Design: 100 Ways to Research Complex Problems,Develop Innovative Ideas, and Design Effective Solutions. Rockport Publishers5. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage Publications.6. National Science Foundation, & National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2012). Characteristicsof Doctoral Scientists and Engineers in the United States: 2008 (pp. 1–83). Arlington, VA. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nsf.gov/statistics /nsf13302/.7. National Science Foundation, & Statistics., N. C. for S. and E

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division: Retention of Undergraduate Students

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Whitney Winders; Cariana Cornel; Caralea Cornel, Brigham Young University; Allie Larson; Sarah A. Cunha; Samuel Moses, Brigham Young University; Dale C. Rowe, Brigham Young University; Laura Wilkinson, Brigham Young University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

new $300 million diversity initiative. Fortune. 2015 Jan 12.4. Wilhelm A. Intel Promises $300M To Boost The Representation Of Women And Minorities In Tech. Techcrunch.2015.5. McGregor J. Is Intel’s diversity goal really that “bold”? Washington Post. 2015 Jan 8.6. Microsoft. Bridging the Gender Gap: Growing the Next Generation of Women in Computing. Redmond, WA;2014.7. Olson R. Percentage of Bachelor’s degrees conferred to women, by major (1970-2012). 2014.8. Caldwell T. Plugging the cyber-security skills gap. Computer Fraud & Security. 2013;2013(7):5–10.9. Leclair J, Lifang S, Sherly A. Women in STEM and Cyber Security Fields. In: Proceedings of the 2014Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration. Indiana: ASEE; 2014.10. Dampier D

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniela Faas, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Anne M Lucietto, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Gretchen L. Hein, Michigan Technological University; Lucy Lenhardt, Pennsylvania State University, Erie (Behrend College); Christi Patton Luks, Missouri University of Science & Technology; Beth A Myers, University of Colorado Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

academic population, underrepresented and misunderstood.Early discussion at the board level in the mid 2000’s indicated a willingness for a paradigm shift.However, the representation of academics on the board and other leadership roles has beenlacking. This can be attributed to the lower numbers of this group relative to the whole, as wellas the requirements of tenure that do not support the time and dedication to such an endeavor. Asmall but influential group of members, including a former board member, and a few involved atvarious levels of the society have been working toward increasing opportunities for women inacademia (WIA). Some of the initiatives have been the societal support of the WIA committee,the addition of professional development

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela M Kelly, Stony Brook University; Doreen Aveni, Stony Brook University; Monica Bugallo, Stony Brook University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

students 6follow throughout their four- 4year undergraduate studies. 2 0Both intellectual and Co mp ine g M tric gin ce g he g En Ph s m Ot vil ine El ter cie

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephany Coffman-Wolph, University of Texas, Austin; Kimberlyn Gray, West Virginia University Inst. of Tech.

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

disabilities in science and engineering,” NSF 15-311, Arlington, VA, 2015.[2] WVUIT Common Data Set 2017-2018. West Virginia University, 2017 [Online]. Available:https://planning.wvu.edu/files/d/8ed4b6a2-1eed-43c4-8c17-2992915bca00/wvuit-cds_2017-2018.pdf. [Accessed: 16- Mar- 2018][3] “Science and engineering indicators 2004,” National Science Board, May 2004 [Online].Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind04/, last accessed May 25, 2009.[4] M. Yilmaz, J. Ren, S. Custer and J. Coleman, "Hands-On Summer Camp to Attract K–12Students to Engineering Fields," in IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 144-151,Feb. 2010.

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jennifer Retherford P.E., The University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Sarah J Mobley P.E., The University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Kristen N. Wyckoff, The University of Tennessee at Knoxville

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Teacher Quality, vol. 95, no. 2. pp. 152–157, 2005. [11] F. Hoffman and P. Oreopoulos, “A Professor Like Me: The Influence of Instructor Gender on College Achievement,” Cambridge, MA, 2007.[12] J. Price, “The Effect of Instructor Race and Gender on Student Persistence in STEM Fields,” Econ. Educ. Rev., vol. 29, pp. 901–910, 2010.[13] S. E. Carrell, M. E. Page, and J. E. West, “Sex and Science: How Professor Gender Perpetuates the Gender Gap,” Q. J. Econ., vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 1101–1144, 2010.[14] National Center for Education Statistics, “Postsecondary Education: Faculty and Instructional Staff,” in Digest of Education Statistics, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://nces.ed.gov/programs

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sinéad C Mac Namara, Syracuse University; Anne E Rauh, Syracuse University; Michelle M Blum, Syracuse University; Natalie Russo, Syracuse University; Melissa A Green, Syracuse University; Shikha Nangia, Syracuse University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

successful women scientists. Yale University Press, 2006.[2] L. J. Sax and K. N. S. Newhouse, “Disciplinary Field Specificity and Variation in the STEM Gender Gap,” New Dir. Institutional Res., vol. 2018, no. 179, pp. 45–71, Sep. 2018.[3] J. L. Smith et al., “Added benefits: How supporting women faculty in STEM improves everyone’s job satisfaction,” J. Divers. High. Educ., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 502–517, Dec. 2018.[4] H. Blackburn, “The Status of Women in STEM in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature 2007–2017,” Sci. Technol. Libr., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 235–273, Jul. 2017.[5] R. E. Steinpreis, K. A. Anders, and D. Ritzke, “The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of job applicants and

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 10

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Miguel X. Rodriguez-Paz, Tecnologico de Monterrey (ITESM); Israel Zamora-Hernandez, Tecnologico de Monterrey; Jorge A. Gonzalez-Mendivil, Tecnológico de Monterrey; J. Asuncion Zarate-Garcia, Tecnologico de Monterrey (ITESM)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

0049-089X,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.09.014.[4] Pietri, Evava S., Drawbaugh, Montana L., Lewis, Arielle N. and Johnson, India R. “Whoencourages Latina women to feel a sense of identity-safety in STEM environments?”, Journal ofExperimental Social Psychology, Volume 84, 2019, 103827, ISSN 0022-1031,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103827.[5] Fischer, Stefanie. “The downside of good peers: How classroom composition differentiallyaffects men's and women's STEM persistence”, Labour Economics, Volume 46, 2017, Pages 211-226, ISSN 0927-5371, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2017.02.003[6] Rodríguez-Paz, Miguel X., Gonzalez-Mendivil, Jorge A., Zarate-Garcia, J. Asuncion andPeña-Ortega, Luis O., “The Positive Effects of Using Social