discuss futureplans for analysis with a larger sample who also provided information about a variety of non-cognitiveand affective (NCA) factors in order to identify significant predictors of engineering student success. IntroductionGrades, and by extension grade point average (GPA), are among the most frequently used indicators ofstudent success in both research and practice. In education research, GPA is often used as a measure ofacademic performance, and has been studied in a variety of settings and alongside a variety of correlates,such as self-efficacy or motivation [1]. In U.S. colleges and universities, grades and GPA are used tomeasure performance in the classroom, determine eligibility for
school outcomes (Chen and Jang [16];33 Ryan and Deci [17]; Ryan and Grolnick [18]; Ryan, et al. [19]). Feelings of relatedness,34 measured in terms of "school climate" and instructor-student relationships, have been linked to35 outcomes including self-efficacy, engagement, interest in school, higher grades, and retention36 (Furrer and Skinner [20]; Inkelas and Weisman [21]; Inkelas, et al. [22]).37 Relatedness has often been discussed along with autonomy and competence as one of the38 psychological needs for intrinsic motivation [23, 24]. Skinner, et al. [25] argued that "relatedness39 tends to be overlooked as a self-perception in the academic domain." In the past, relatedness is40 normally considered in the context of team
prospects used inengineering education as they help young engineering students prepare for their future careers.Jiaqi Luo et al. Ref. 9 find out that the quality of transportation education is improvedtremendously when it incorporates the innovative CDIO (Conceive, Design, Implement,Operate) framework. Hence, the physical implementation of theoretical engineering conceptsthrough project-based learning is crucial to enhance students learning outcome in engineeringclasses as intervention implementation in engineering education in general and transportationengineering in particular improved students' cognitive skills, self-efficacy, teamwork, andcommunication skills 3. The importance of project experience is one of the main reasons whylabs often
. Previously developed instruments could be utilizedto look at impact on design self-efficacy with students who have access to an academicmakerspace at different stages in their undergraduate career [15].References[1] E. Halverson and K. Sheridan, “The Maker Movement in Education,” Harvard Educational Review, vol. 84, pp. 495–504, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063.[2] S. Carlson, “The maker movement goes to college”, Chronicle of Higher Education, vol. 61, A26– A28, 2015.[3] V. Wilczynski and R. Adrezin, “Higher Education Makerspaces and Engineering Education,” presented at the ASME 2016 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1115/IMECE2016-68048.[4] M. M. Hynes
. Sense of belonging is positivelyassociated with retention and persistence [10], self-efficacy [11], and a successful transition tocollege [12]. When sense of belonging is lacking, students’ academic performance suffers [9].Sense of Belonging in Online EnvironmentsPilcher [13] extended Strayhorn’s [7] sense of belonging work and applied it to a review of theliterature on establishing community in online learning spaces. Two models of communitydevelopment in online learning spaces emerged in Pilcher’s [13] literature review: (1) aconceptual framework called Community of Inquiry (COI), which explains that teaching, social,and cognitive presence contribute to community development, and (2) a measurement modelcalled Rovai’s Classroom Community Scale
-19 pandemic differs from these earlier and continuing trends in distance learning, notonly in terms of scale and pervasiveness, but, importantly, also in self-efficacy. This switch wasinvoluntary for both teachers and learners. Wei and Chou found that learners’ perceptions ofself-efficacy had a marked effect on their learning readiness in the remote environment [23]. Thisleads to challenges with engagement, as observed in several studies [11-16]. Serhan evaluatedstudent perceptions of the Zoom platform and found that students were not motivated to activelyparticipate in a remote setting [16]. This is in line with prior studies that report a lower level ofengagement, participation and retention rates [17], [26] and overall reduced
senior design or capstone projects,” ASEE Annual. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2018-June, no. July, 2018.[20] S. Gillespie and A. Maccalman, “A Case Study in Developing an Integrated Data and Model Management System for the Development of a Complex Engineered System,” in 2018 IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Conference, 2018.[21] K. Laitinen and M. Valo, “Meanings of communication technology in virtual team meetings: Framing technology-related interaction,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., vol. 111, pp. 12–22, 2018.[22] R. Khan, C. Whitcomb, and C. White, “Self-efficacy analysis of student learning in systems engineering,” ASME Int. Mech. Eng. Congr. Expo. Proc., vol. 5, 2016.[23] E
: A case for the assertion-evidence approach,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(6), 1564-1579, 2013.[11] L. Reave. “Technical communication instruction in engineering schools: A survey of top- ranked US and Canadian programs.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 18(4), 452-490, 2004.[12] M. Schuurman, M. Alley, M. Marshall, C. Johnstone, “The effect of a targeted speech communication course on the public speaking self efficacy of engineering undergraduates. In Proceedings from the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 2008, June. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/3210.[13] C. A. Twigg, C. A. “Redefining Community: Small Colleges in
Proceedings, 2018, doi: 10.18260/1-2--30204.[56] J. A. Mejia, D. Ruiz, V. Popov, A. Esquinca, and D. Gadbois, “Board 104: Asset-based Practices in Engineering Design (APRENDE): Development of a Funds-of-Knowledge Approach for the Formation of Engineers,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[57] S. L. Dika, M. A. Pando, B. Q. Tempest, and M. E. Allen, “Examining the Cultural Wealth of Underrepresented Minority Engineering Persisters,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 144, no. 2, pp. 1–9, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000358.[58] S. L. Dika, M. A. Pando, B. Q. Tempest, K. A. Foxx, and M. E. Allen, “Engineering self- efficacy, interactions with faculty
selected to receive NSF S-STEM funded scholarships. Annualscholarships starting at $4,500 are renewable for up to 5 years and incrementally increase by$1,000 per year through year four. Students must retain in engineering and maintain acumulative GPA of at least 3.0 to renew the scholarships.2.0 MethodologyStudent participants who receive NSF S-STEM funded scholarships are required to participate insurveys, one-on-one interviews, and focus groups each semester of their undergraduateeducation. The students provide quantitative data by completing a modified version of theLongitudinal Assessment of Engineering Self-Efficacy (LAESE) survey, the twelve questionGRIT survey, and a shortened version of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire
education: secondary testing might improve • Excessive focus ofHow prospective mathematics student scores but fail as a standardized testing asteachers grapple with teachers (PMTs) measure of teaching efficacy measure of teacher efficacyusing culturally • Predefined topics and rigid • Lack of classroom/curricularresponsive teaching instructional guides limit the autonomypractices in the age of extent to which teachers canstandardized testing
mental health and academic success for college students.33,34,35,36 Anecdotally, it was the authors’ experience in working with students in each speciality area (instruction of engineering content, mental health counseling and academic counseling), that students often view these components as separate and disconnected. However, it is our view that these aspects are closely interconnected and can have a cyclical effect, i.e. increasing students’ awareness and use of strategies that improve mental health positively impact academic performance,33, 35 and using effective organizational and learning strategies improve students’ academic success and therefore their self-efficacy, motivation and overall mental health.34, 36 Starting
at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of self-efficacy, belonging, and other non- cognitive aspects of the student experience on engagement, success, and persistence and on effective methods for teaching global issues such as those pertaining to sustainability. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Industry-University Capstone Design: How did students adapt to the COVID-19 pandemic?AbstractA 2015 survey of 256 institutions from the US revealed that 70% of their capstone programswere funded by industry and government sponsors. This indicates the
protocolapproved by the Institutional Review Board at LPI. SurveyA survey was designed to measure students’ feelings of belonging, engineering identity, and selfperceptions of math skills competence, as summarized in Table 2. These survey items had a 7-point response scale, with the exception of the math confidence (or self-efficacy) items that had a5-point scale. The survey also included additional items, but these are beyond the scope of theresearch questions explored in this paper. The pre and post surveys in 2017 and 2018 included afairly large number of items (73), with additional questions added to the post survey in fall 2018.Concerns with the length of the survey and quality of student responses led to an effort tooptimize the survey
. Her current research interests, publications, and presentations give attention to racial identity, science identity, science self- efficacy, metacognition, and STEM achievement of African American students. As a strong advocate for the participation of African American females in STEM, Dr. White continuously engages in discourse and research that will promote greater access to STEM-related opportunities and recognition of African American females. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Faculty Perceptions of STEM Student and Faculty Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study (WIP)Abstract The recent
.). (2014). Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations. Routledge.[6] Townsend, B. K., & Wilson, K. B. (2009). The academic and social integration of persisting community college transfer students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 10(4), 405-423.[7] Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.[8] Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business Press.[9] Pajares, F. (1996). "Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings." Review of educational
and Self-efficacy," Active Learning in Higher Education, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 119-132, 2015.[13] M. Schwartz, "Open Book Exams (PDF)," Ryerson University, [Online]. Available: https://www.ryerson.ca/content/dam/learning-teaching/teaching- resources/assessment/open-book-exams.pdf. [Accessed 7 March 2021].[14] Western Illinois University, "Fast Facts," 2020. [Online]. Available: http://www.wiu.edu/about/docs/fastfacts.pdf. [Accessed 7 March 2021].[15] Registrar, Interviewee, WIU Math Minors 2017-2021. [Interview]. 1 March 2021.[16] Registrar, Interviewee, WIU Engineering Retention 2017-2021. [Interview]. 1 March 2021.[17] American Society for Engineering Education, Engineering by the Numbers: ASEE Retention and Time-to
perceptions of both the organization and the individual [61]. Researchestimates that a failure to empower employees in their work costs U.S. businesses up to $550billion annually [62]. The interaction between value incongruence and empowerment is criticalbecause it highlights a space where engineers might experience tensions that their engineeringeducation makes them ill-equipped to address [24] [38]. Notably, Chatman [63] postulates that aperson can successfully overcome potential adverse effects caused by person-organization valueincongruence—and even influence the organization’s values to be more like their own—if theyfeel empowered (i.e., perceive themselves as having self-efficacy and control) over the situation.We argue that these tensions
., and Lents, N.H. (2017). “Cultivating minorityscientists: undergraduate research increases self-efficacy and career ambitions forunderrepresented students in STEM.” J. Research in Science Teaching, 54(2), 169-194.18. Wao, H. O., Lee, R. S. & Borman, K. (2010). Climate for retention to graduation: Amixed methods investigation of student perceptions of Engineering departments and programs.Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 16, 293-318.19. Perrin, J., “Features of Engaging and Empowering Experiential Learning Programs forCollege Students,” Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 11(2), 2014, article 2.https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol11/iss2/2/.20. National Center for Education Statistics. (2019
., Charles, P., Orthner, D., & Cooley, V. (2011). Teacher Perspectives on Career-Relevant Curriculum in Middle School. RMLE Online, 34(5), 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2011.11462078[10] Elliott, J. W., Perkins, M., & Thevenin, M. K. (2018). Measuring Undergraduate Students’Construction Education Domain Self-Efficacy, Motivation, and Planned Behavior: Validation ofa Concise Survey Instrument. International Journal of Construction Education and Research,14(4), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2017.1316802[11] Riojas, M., Lysecky, S., & Rozenblit, J. (2012). Educational Technologies for PrecollegeEngineering Education. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 5(1), 20–37.https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2011.16[12] Adams, L
Graduate Training Program on Teaching Self Efficacy,” Natl. Teach. Educ. J., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 49–56, 2011.[15] F. Nasser-Abu Alhija and B. Fresko, “Graduate teaching assistants: how well do their students think they do?,” Assess. Eval. High. Educ., vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 943–954, 2018.[16] C. Graham and C. Essex, “Defining and ensuring academic rigor in online and on-campus courses: Instructor perspectives.,” in Annual Proceedings of Selected Research and Development [and] Practice Papers Presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 2001, pp. 330–337.[17] J. S. Boman, “Graduate student teaching development: Evaluating the effectiveness of training in
the interviews over a three-day period in private conference rooms at the high schoolduring the participants’ regularly scheduled science or engineering courses. The teacher, amember of the research team, was aware of which students participated in the interviews,however, to protect participant confidentiality, we did not share any interview data with theteacher until after the semester had ended. Our interview protocol was developed with questionsto collect data about 1) students’ beliefs about the nature of intelligence (i.e., fixed versus growthmindset), 2) science self-efficacy, 3) career aspirations, 4) views on the gender gap in STEM,and 5) students’ beliefs about smartness. In this paper, we focus on the data collected from theportion
]. In addition, it has been shown that an Online PBL environment supports self-efficacy, a key elementfor students’ success in the online environment [12].According to (Kow, 2019) [7], the online PBL model is not different from the traditional classroommodel, only the environment changes. The PBL model employed for this course follows that by Peffers etal, 2007 [14] as shown in Figure 3. Figure 3: Project-Based Lesson Structure Model [14]3.0 Method 3The Project AssignmentThe team of three mechanical engineering students were given the project description below. The methodto be employed in executing the project included site visits, customer interviews, engineering
, 2021 Community Designers: A Pilot Virtual Community Co-Design Symposium1. Introduction: Who Controls the Power of Design?What if you did not get to select your clothes? What if, instead, certain sizes, colors and styleswere assigned to you based on what’s typical for your demographic identities? Not only wouldyour clothes not fit your shape or your taste, they might even cause further social andprofessional problems. At an even deeper level, not having the autonomy to make thesedecisions would undermine your self-efficacy and your trust in the institutions that are supposedto help and support you.This scenario illustrates, by analogy, what happens to communities all the time. Policies
relevant resources, which will beintroduced to all departments through an orientation and follow-up communications.Guided Engineering Apprenticeship in Research (GEAR): Launched in 2019, GEAR is ayear-long research experience for early undergraduates that aims to provide a scaffoldedexperience to support the development of students’ research self-efficacy, engineering identity,and sense of belonging and inclusion within the field--especially among underrepresented, firstgeneration, and low-income students. The program is based on the NSF-funded Early ResearchScholars Program in the Computer Science and Engineering Department [14]. Assessment of thepilot year of the GEAR program found that 1) participants gained research skills/knowledge inways
been proven again and again to bepoor indicators of success in graduate school, particularly in research-based degree programs;and instead, are better predictors of gender and race/ethnicity. Likewise, research tells us that astudent’s GPA is a result of a wide variety of factors in addition to academic potential, includinggender, race, first generation status, and socioeconomic standing [24-29].Alternatively, several better indicators have now been correlated with graduate school success inresearch-based degree programs, including self-efficacy, perseverance, motivation, and a passionfor research and prior research experience [30-34]. A holistic application review process thatfocuses on these evidence-based metrics of success with a de
Civil En- gineering from North Carolina State University in the USA. Her disciplinary research interests lie in the area of sustainability in asphalt pavements using material considerations, green technologies, and efficient pavement preservation techniques. Her doctoral work focused on improving the performance of recycled asphalt pavements using warm mix asphalt additives. As a postdoctoral scholar at North Carolina State University, she worked on several NCDOT sponsored research projects including developing specifica- tions for crack sealant application and performing field measurements of asphalt emulsion application in tack coats and chip seals. Her undergraduate teaching experience includes foundational
assignificant predictors of teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction in South Africa [49].Aconsistent theme in these articles was the need to revisit the underlying reasons that teachersjoin the profession to start with.Long-term teaching practices. The next systemic reform recommendation advocates theextension of government-sponsored teaching practice for STEM educators to betterappreciate the requirements of the teaching profession in schools. The recommendation waswidely encouraged by 91.8% of the sample population that was involved in the mixedmethods study [50]. The authors investigated school administrators’ perceptions of theemployability of preservice science, technology, and mathematics teachers through teachingpractice in Nigeria. The
self-efficacy and supporting their further classroom experience andprofessional identity.Fletcher et al. [16] illustrates the former and highlights the top HBCU, Spelman College as anexemplary institution. The women-only HBCU historically provides a climate that centers asset-based practices yielding an environment—regardless of external factors— of professionalexcellence and scholarly development. Spelman leverages the strengths and unique features oftheir students by ensuring that they are not only prepared to be in any sector, but they embodyexcellence in their lives. The notions of identity begetting success are complex and present afurther complicated concept when considering the pressures placed on students to navigateacademia
: Was admitted in Summer 2018, completed all courses; commented saying admission to program was smoother than admission to the University.Findings from the SurveyExhibit 3 shows numerical summaries of responses to survey questions. Students admitted inSpring 2021 could only answer the first 3 survey questions related to Application & Admission,Onboarding, and MEM SSC Effectiveness. This was due to minimal interaction and experiencewith the program at the time of survey completion. Hence, several students admitted in Spring2021 wrote in the open comments area of the survey that they marked Neutral or they chose tonot answer questions 4 – 9 (see Exhibit 3).Questions were measured on a 5-point Likert scale and an open response field was