Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pradeep Kashinath Waychal, NMIMS University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Shirpur campus and at College of Engineering Pune (COEP) as the founder head of the innovation Center. Dr Waychal earned his Ph D in the area of developing Innovation Competencies in Information System Organizations from IIT Bombay and M Tech in Control Engineering from IIT Delhi. He has presented keynote / invited talks in many high prole international conferences and has published papers in peer- reviewed journals. He / his teams have won awards in Engineering Education, Innovation, Six Sigma, and Knowledge Management at international events. Recently, his paper won the Best Teaching Strategies Paper award at the most respected international conference in the area of engineering education - Annual conference of

Conference Session

Labs & Hands-on Instruction I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cyrus Habibi P.E., University of Wisconsin, Platteville; Chase Fearing, University of Wisconsin, Platteville; Mesut Muslu P.E., University of Wisconsin, Platteville

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

University –Mankato at the Iron Range Engineering program where he served as an Assistant Professor. Professor Habibi has taught a number of electrical engineering courses such Analog Electronics, Advance Analog Design, Communications, Circuits II, Signals and Systems, and Controls. Professor. Habibi’s passion for engineering education, teaching and mentorship is demonstrated each day through his inter- actions with students inside and outside the classroom. To this point, he has shared his knowledge of best practices in engineering education with his peers through the many articles he has published in ASEE conference proceedings. He has been investigating novel methods on how to motivate students to learn, as well as

Conference Session

Research Methods II: Meeting the Challenges of Engineering Education Research

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maura J. Borrego, University of Texas - Austin; Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan; Lisa R. Lattuca, University of Michigan; Prateek Shekhar, University of Texas - Austin

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

extent to which educationalinterventions rarely meet the needs of all students. Depending on the level of engagement withthe sites (which may be extensive in the case of qualitative or site visit approaches), a multi-sitedesign can prompt researchers to write implications and recommendations that are relevantacross a wider range of local settings. Conducting studies across multiple sites allows educatorsand researchers to understand the conditions under which interventions are most likely topositively impact students.When multi-site studies are published in the peer-reviewed literature, certain details related toarranging for and managing the sites are often overlooked or removed for space considerations.Tradeoffs and failed negotiations are

Conference Session

Innovations in Advanced Fabrication Technologies

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

R. Radharamanan, Mercer University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

electronic components;7. Do the calibrations, conduct flying tests, correct the errors, and make the drone to fly;8. Write the final reportwith the team members and prepare the poster for final presentation in consultation with the academic training advisor. Submit the final report and make the oral and poster presentation.In addition, this project is designed to fully/partially satisfy some of the ABET's student learningoutcomes that include:b. An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data;c. An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as safety, manufacturability, and sustainability;d. An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams;g

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Noah Salzman, Boise State University; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

teacher, as well as several years of electrical and mechanical engineering design experience as a practicing engineer. He received his Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering from Swarthmore College, his Master’s of Education degree from the University of Massachusetts, and a Master’s of Science in Mechanical Engineering and Doctorate in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette Matthew W. Ohland is Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students, team assignment, peer evaluation, and

Conference Session

Concurrent Paper Tracks Session I Curriculum

Collection

2016 ASEE International Forum

Authors

Douglas Moore Schutz, Tokyo University of Science; Dante Dionne, Korean Air; Yong-Young Kim P.E., Konkuk University

Tagged Topics

International Forum

hierarchicallevels across more autonomous employees having similar hierarchical levels in flattertopologies [35]. In student-centered pedagogy learning theory at many universities in theU.S., learning shifts from top-down to bottom-up. This can be particularly helpful atengineering schools where classes are being turned “upside-down” with peer-led teamlearning workshops. This active-learning approach has led to increased confidence,intellectual curiosity, and interest in teaching among students [37]. Through student-centeredlearning, the individual student is responsible for setting learning goals, working towardsthem, monitoring feedback, and making appropriate adjustments [38]. We use power distanceas our measure for hierarchy. Power distance is the

Conference Session

Promoting Multidisciplinary Efforts

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chan Ham, Kennesaw State University; Jasmine Cherelle Washington; Steven Howell Sims, Hopewell Designs, Inc.; Kevin Stanley McFall, Kennesaw State University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

) Presentation 5% 2. Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Presentation & Written Report 10% 3. Critical Design Review (CDR) Presentation & Written Report / Final Presentation and Written Report 25% 4. Completion and Demo of a Prototype 30% 5. Notebook, Weekly Progress Report, and other Presentations/Exams, Attendance and other assignment 20% 6. Performance Evaluation by Peer 10%While all learning outcomes are important, effective communication [f] is of particularemphasis11. This ensures that engineering students, who by definition have strong technicalbackgrounds, are also capable of properly documenting their work writing and effectivelypresenting the material.III. Mobile Telepresence Robot Project OverviewThis project develops

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Pre-college Programs for Women

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paula Ann Monaco, Texas Tech University; Aimee Cloutier, Texas Tech University; Guo Zheng Yew, Texas Tech University; Maeghan Marie Brundrett, Texas Tech University; Dylan Christenson, Texas Tech University; Audra N. Morse, Texas Tech University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division, Women in Engineering

supplemental readings prior to each engineering discipline’s discipline specific lessonproviding background knowledge for each activity. Students were tasked to work in groups on anopen-ended project applying knowledge of the six disciplines introduced throughout theprogram. Problem-based learning through the assigned project allowed students to develop skillssuch as teamwork, oral communication, time management and project management. During thefinal program session, students gave an oral presentation to peers, parents and programinstructors detailing their design solutions to a real-world problem. Evaluation instruments of theoutreach program’s design included pre- and post-questionnaires for assessment of theinteractive sessions, and their impact

Conference Session

Integrating Systems Engineering into the Capstone Project

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Armand Joseph Chaput, Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics University of Texas at Austin

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering, Systems Engineering

mission simulation. The semester ends withpresentation of competitive team proposals at an Alternate System Concept Review (ASCR) andsubmittal of substantiating design and SE documentation. Down-select is based 50/50 onpresentation and design documentation quality including SE related topics such as requirementcompliance and decision documentation and implementation. Student grades are based onindividual student exam and project grades combined with individual shares of team gradesbased on team peer evaluations of individual student contributions. Figure 2: ASCR reviewers include the instructional staff and local industry/former students who evaluate proposal briefings to defined exit criteriaAt the beginning of the 2nd semester

Conference Session

Dissecting the Nuances that Hinder Broad Participation in Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian A. Burt, Iowa State University; Alade S McKen, Iowa State University; Jordan Anthony Burkhart, Iowa State University; Jennifer Hormell, Iowa State University; Alec James Knight, Iowa State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

Paper ID #14786Racial Microaggressions within the Advisor-advisee Relationship: Implica-tions for Engineering Research, Policy, and PracticeDr. Brian A. Burt, Iowa State University Brian A. Burt is Assistant Professor of Higher Education at Iowa State University. He studies graduate stu- dents’ learning and achievement, particularly those from underrepresented backgrounds in STEM fields. He also examines the institutional policies and practices that influence students’ educational and work- force pathways. His research, writing, and teaching and advising directly relate to his personal journey as a collegiate student

Conference Session

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Addressing the NGSS: Supporting K12 Teachers in Engineering Pedagogy, Engineering Science, Careers, and Technical Pathways

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael E. Edley, Drexel University; Stephanie Owens, Science Leadership Academy; Jessica S. Ward, Drexel University; Adam K. Fontecchio, Drexel University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

successfully coordinated with multiple faculty members in the submission of approximately 600 grant proposals, including co-writing, editing and serving as the Program Manager for 5 awarded STEM edu- cation grants totaling more than $12M. She has collaborated with University offices and College faculty and professional staff in the facilitation of recruitment strategies to increase the quality and quantity of undergraduate and graduate enrollment, including supervising the planning and implementation of Open House and other recruitment events. Jessica now manages the day-to-day operations of the DragonsTeach program, including supporting the development of programs of study, student recruitment, fundraising and grant

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Division: Engagement, Experiential Learning, and Balance

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Luster-Teasley, North Carolina A&T State University; Sirena C. Hargrove-Leak, Elon University; Willietta Gibson

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

. Four original case studies were developed using the Herreid(1997) definition of the components for a good case study used in the sciences.12, 13 TheNational Center for Case Study Teaching in Science (NCCSTS) model recommends several keyfactors for developing a good case.12 These are: 1) the case tells a story; 2) it focuses on aninteresting-arousing issue; 3) the case is set within the past five years and can be real or fictionalas long as it is factual; 4) it creates empathy with the central characters; 5) the case must havepedagogic utility; and 5) the case is short. Cases submitted to NCCSTS are peer reviewed andpublished in a database. Table 1 lists the four cases and tour developed for the educational studyto be used in the laboratory

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aisling Coughlan, University of Toledo; Tanya A. Faltens, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Kerrie A Douglas, Purdue University, West Lafayette; David R. Johnson, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Materials

biomaterials and glass science. During her time at Alfred University, Dr. Coughlan taught a wide range of classes including to upper level undergraduate students and graduate students. Dr. Coughlan spent the following 2 years at the School of Materials Engineering at Purdue University as a Visiting Assistant Professor, where she continued her research on glass based materials and taught core material science classes. In January 2016 Dr. Coughlan began her appointment as a tenure-track Assistant Professor in the Department of Bioengineering at the University of Toledo . Dr. Coughlan has authored/contributed to over 40 peer-reviewed journal publications and has presented at international conferences in Europe and the United

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelsey Joy Rodgers, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Bryan W. Boudouris, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Michael T. Harris, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Associate Dean for Engagement and Undergraduate Education and the Reilly Professor of Chemical Engineering, and Professor of Environmental and Ecological Engineering in the College of Engineering at Purdue University, West Lafayette. He was a Purdue University Faculty Scholar from 2002 to 2007, served as the Programming Chair and Chair of the ASEE Minority Division (2011-2014); and was named Fellow of AIChE (2009), won the AIChE Grimes Award for Excellence in Chemical Engineering (2005), and the AIChE Minority Affairs Distinguished Service Award (2009). . He is the author of 95 peer-reviewed publications and 11 patents. He received his BS in Chemical Engineering in 1981 from Mississippi State University, and both his MS

Conference Session

Focus on Faculty Development

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexandra Coso Strong, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Mel Chua, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

 engineering education researchers’ exploration of ways POD could aid them in disseminating their research, and to  12​scaffold them through communicating those thoughts to the POD community​ . At POD, we intended to challenge the faculty development experts to “think like an engineer” and to have  13​them brainstorm responses to the messages from the FIE participants​ . In particular, at FIE, engineering education researchers were asked to consider their dissemination needs based on their individual research pursuits and those of their peers (see Table 1). Participants created affinity diagram of

Conference Session

Assessment of Engineering Leadership Skills

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joshua C. Palmer, Southern Illinois University - Carbondale; Kenneth D. Birchler, Southern Illinois University; Joseph David Narusis, Southern Illinois University; Rhonda K Kowalchuk, Southern Illinois University - Carbondale; Bruce DeRuntz, Southern Illinois University - Carbondale

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

were asked to answer questions regarding all of theengineering/technical leadership programs utilized at their university (i.e., includes all degrees,minors, certificates and other coursework). The questions asking about all program componentsexamined areas such as team-based applied projects, leadership coursework, mentorship, andcorporate sponsorship. Several items provided open-ended text boxes that allowed participants todescribe unique features of their programs (We elaborate on the open-ended responses in theconclusions section)Results We used IBM SPSS to calculate frequencies of the data collected. The results section willfeature frequency tables for each item followed by a brief write-up describing key findings.Further

Conference Session

Faculty Development I: Attitudes Towards Teaching

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Debra A. Fowler, Texas A&M University; Maria L. Macik, Texas A&M University; James Kaihatu, Texas A&M University; Chelsea A. H. Bakenhus, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

data from sources internal to the university. A mixed methods approach wasutilized for data gathering. Internal data collection included: faculty and student surveysregarding conceptual gaps, a student helpdesk survey, a student prerequisite survey, a studentsupplemental resources analysis, and student focus groups. Discussions with foundational mathand science faculty who taught courses supplemental to the engineering curriculum, alsooccurred to seek clarification of content and terminology taught (Fowler, Anthony, Poling,Morgan, & Brumbelow, 2014).Step 3) Gather data external to the university. External data was gathered from employers,advisory board members, and former students using electronic surveys. The CTT conducted areview of peer

Conference Session

Viewpoints, Perspectives, and Creativity in Civil Engineering Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Abbie B Liel P.E., University of Colorado - Boulder; Timothy J Clarkin, University of Colorado - Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

it enjoyable to work with a groupof people you interact with on a daily basis, and getting to know my peers outside of the engineering center, was agreat experience … Working on this project with Student A, Student B, and Student C allowed me to get to knowthem on a personal level. I learned more about what they are involved with in their engineering program… Sometechnical information I received was from Student A, who has worked on construction projects with her dad eversince she was a kid. She taught me some construction practices that I would have never thought about in regards tomeasuring the plastic more efficiently and effectively. This project was such a great experience, that I wouldrecommend doing it again, the same way. Thanks to

Conference Session

Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jerome P. Lavelle, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy

comparisons of the engineering economy course taught in most industrial engineering programs’ curricula. Table 7 provides potential comparisons for such a course. Similar benchmarking would be possible for other IE courses, as well as courses in any program versus peers. Table 7: Example potential comparisons for engineering economy course   What textbook/materials are being used for the course?  What are the pre-requisites/co-requisites for this course?  What is the annual course enrollment and section sizes used?  What % of lecture/lab is being used in the pedagogy?  Is there Criterion 5 engineering design content claimed in this course?  What is the claimed Criterion 5 math/basic

Conference Session

Student Success I: Interventions and Programs

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joanna Perry Weaver, University of Louisville; Marci S. Decaro, University of Louisville; Jeffrey Lloyd Hieb, University of Louisville; Patricia A. Ralston, University of Louisville

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

-stereotyped groups that results from awareness of the expectation that they will underperformrelative to their peers.6 Belonging can be domain-specific, and instruments for measuring belonging in specificsubject areas have been developed.12 For example, math belonging is associated with increasedconfidence in one’s own math abilities and belief in the utility of math. Good, Rattan, & Dweck7found that women who perceived a gender stereotype in their college calculus classesexperienced a drop in math belonging, and that drop predicted lower course grades and intent topursue math in the future. Information about belonging is provided by cues from students’ learning environment .7Thus, a learning environment that increases belonging by

Conference Session

But I'm a Loner! Expanding capability and creativity by examining effective alliances

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shannon Ciston, University of California, Berkeley; Colin Cerretani, University of California, Berkeley; Marjorie S Went, UC Berkeley

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

withinsubgroups assigned to those tasks, the subgroup should continue to share the responsibility forcompleting the task. For example, if three TAs are responsible for homework solutions for theweek and they divide the task of writing solutions by problem, the entire group should still beheld responsible for the delivery and accuracy of the entire solution set, should be heldaccountable for answering any and all student questions on that problem set and should be ableto defend the grading for that problem set. If TAs share leading sections or supervising labstations, encourage or require them to attend the section that their teammate is directly leading.Maintain consistency. What does the instructor require to be consistent? To what extent dodiscussion

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 1: Using Technology and/or Technology Tools to Enhance Learning

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Matthew Long, Deakin University; Sivachandran Chandrasekaran P.E., Deakin University; Simon William Cavenett

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

student-student learning through online collaboration, where students and staff have interactive discussion forums, access to units, assessments items and engage with lecturers, tutors and other students.20 3. Reimagined learning experience through media-rich study materials and virtual learning environments.21 4. Providing modern tools (such as e-Portfolio) for storing, organizing, reflecting and sharing student learning with others.22 5. Online peer support, seminar groups and workshops to improve the students study skills.Deakin University students also have an opportunity to alternate and combine on-campus andonline education study modes into the undergraduate engineering program on a course-by-course

Conference Session

Research on Diversification, Inclusion, and Empathy II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marissa H. Forbes, University of Colorado - Boulder; Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado - Boulder; Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, University of Colorado - Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

and was awarded NAE’s 2008 Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Implicit Bias? Disparity in Opportunities to Select Technical versus Non-Technical Courses in Undergraduate Engineering ProgramsAbstractUndergraduate engineering students are commonly afforded minimal opportunities to choosetheir courses as compared to their non-engineering peers on campus. In addition, manyengineering programs restrict students’ limited curricular choices to courses that are heavilyskewed to be technical in nature, further limiting students’ ability to realize a broad and balancedcollege

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 4B: Assessing Student Motivation and Student Success

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Quamrul H. Mazumder, University of Michigan - Flint; Vasudha Kilaru, University of Michigan - Flint

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

received said that the participants felt to be more mature thantheir peers at home. They reported having more self-confidence, to act more spontaneous and tobe more open-minded. Academic performance has been extensively reported to correlateconsiderably and positively with the choice and application of self-regulated learning strategies 9. The self-regulated dimension highlights self-initiated actions and processes aimed atacquiring and applying information or skills that include goal setting, self-monitoring andmanaging time. It also helps in regulating one's efforts by providing a physical and socialenvironment for goal

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 5A: Work-In-Progress: 5 Minute Postcard Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Clara Novoa, Texas State University - San Marcos; Araceli Martinez Ortiz, Texas State University - San Marcos; Kimberly Grau Talley P.E., Texas State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

friendswho could provide guidance and advice during the academic year, and increase students’ interestin their fields. The orientations also increased enrollment in the departments.The scope in Lam et al.6 work is wider than the one proposed by the authors in this paper since ittargets high school students. However, Lam et al.6 work parallels to this research because it alsodesigns multiple interventions with the ultimate goal of improving student’s retention. The pre-college platform reported in Lam et al.6 consist of three elements. The first one is a six-weeksummer residential pre-engineering program for 9th -12th grade high school students. Thecurriculum includes math, sciences, language arts, technical writing and computer sciencecombined with

Conference Session

Corporate Member Council Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jared V. Berrett, Utah State University; Cedale Sage Armstrong, Utah State University; Curtis G Frazier, Utah State University Eastern

Tagged Topics

Corporate Member Council, Diversity

., Barber, P. H., & Hasson, T. (2015) at UCLA viii showsthat the overall 5-yr degree-completion rate for STEM students at UCLA is 65%. This is muchhigher than the national average. Nearly 70% of non-URM students completed their STEMdegree in 5 years, while the degree-completion rate of URM students in STEM was only 39%.This is significant because it has also been found that URM students entering U.S. colleges arejust as likely as their non-URM peers to aspire to complete a STEM major. ix Native AmericanSTEM students who do attend college face a new barrier. Thompson writes, “FGCS have beendemonstrated to have less access to support for success in higher education, fewer financialresources, fewer role models, and lower career aspiration and

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nadiye O. Erdil, University of New Haven; Ronald S. Harichandran, University of New Haven; Jean Nocito-Gobel, University of New Haven; Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven; Cheryl Q. Li, University of New Haven

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

them into the Blackboard learningmanagement system (LMS).Implementation FrameworkAt the Tagliatela College of Engineering, modules are integrated into courses using a flippedclassroom model. In each course, content is delivered via a short e-learning module outside theclass, and student learning is improved by reinforcing the content covered in the module throughclass discussions and contextual activities. The overall integration has the four main componentsshown in Figure 1. Students complete the e-learning module outside the class within two weeks.During the second week, students are asked to participate in an online or in class discussion. Thediscussion questions enable students to learn through peer and/or instructor interaction

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Division: Engagement, Experiential Learning, and Balance

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado - Boulder; Marissa H. Forbes, University of Colorado - Boulder; Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, University of Colorado - Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

(median 18-19%) and total choice (65-81%), and lower technical requirements (median47-54%), as compared to engineering degrees. The results demonstrate that environmentalengineering students have comparatively less choice and curricular balance that peers in naturalscience and math. However, there are accredited and highly ranked environmental engineeringprograms that allow both choice and greater curricular balance. These programs serve asexamples to others who may want to design programs that allow students to exercise their innateneed for autonomy and also balance their educational experience.IntroductionSelf-determination theory indicates that human beings have an innate psychological need forautonomy, satisfied through choice.1,2 Choice is

Conference Session

Innovative Graduate Programs and Methods, Developing Master's & Ph.D. Programs and Graduate Teaching Assistants

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thomas J. Connolly, University of Texas - Austin

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

during the first semester in which theyare appointed. The TA certification workshop is based on research and best practices ineducation – it takes a hands-on and interactive approach in covering the following topics:understanding undergraduate students and the culture of higher education in the United States,principles of student success, fundamentals of pedagogy, student learning styles, questioningstrategies to increase student engagement, and managing the practical aspects of a TA position,such as working with faculty, grading, office hours, and resolving student issues. TAs are eitherobserved during their classroom/laboratory session or are required to participate in a teachingpracticum session, where they are evaluated by their peers. These

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 10

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian E. Moyer, University of Pittsburgh - Johnstown

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

make adaptations to suit students with less flexibleschedules, especially engineering students, reflected a commitment by faculty and administratorsto be entrepreneurial in seizing opportunities to develop the program.Engineering ChangesAs entrepreneurship activities proceeded in the Business Department, in the Engineeringdivision, a first-year introductory course intended to familiarize students with computerapplications for engineers was modified in 2013 to follow a new paradigm wherein coursecontent was presented paralleling a real-world engineering consulting project. Topic-specificlectures focused on requisite computer application, analysis and writing skills were paced withperiodic “business meetings.” Those meetings were related to a