Paper ID #34138Development of a Low-Cost, Compact, and Portable Experimental Kit forOnline Engineering Statics CourseDr. Md Rashedul Hasan Sarker, University of Indianapolis Md Rashedul H Sarker is an Assistant Professor at R.B. Annis School of Engineering at the University of Indianapolis (UIndy). Prior to joining at UIndy, he worked as a lecturer at The University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP). He also earned his Ph.D. at UTEP. His teaching and research interests include ac- tive learning, project-based learning, energy harvesting, and developing sensors using multi-functional materialsDr. Najmus Saqib, University of
variety of projects to enhance engineering education. Her most recent project included introducing the humanities into envi- ronmental engineering education through a National Endowment for the Humanities project. Dr. Bauer is an active member of ASEE and the Society of Women Engineers (SWE) and currently serves as the Faculty Advisor for Rowan University’s Student Chapter of SWE.Prof. Cheng Zhu, Rowan University Dr. Cheng Zhu is an assistant professor of civil engineering at Rowan University. His research primar- ily concerns multi-scale geomaterial behavior under coupled processes across various time scales, with emphasis placed on microstructure characterization, constitutive model formulation, and computational
Paper ID #33032Development of WeBWorK Prelab Problem Sets to Support Student LearningMs. Sheena Miao Ying Tan, Simon Fraser University Sheena is currently a PhD student in mathematics education at Simon Fraser University. She was pre- viously a secondary mathematics teacher in Singapore and has worked in the Ministry of Education, Singapore. She was the research assistant for the project to develop and implement WeBWorK prelab problems in the course SEE 310, to enhance students’ learning.Taco Niet Ph.D., P.Eng., School of Sustainable Energy Engineering, Simon Fraser University Taco is an Assistant Professor of Professional
and social justice. With her colleagues at Cal State LA she recently received an NSF grant called Eco- STEM which aims to transform STEM education using an asset-based ecosystem model. Specifically, the Eco-STEM project focuses on shifting the metaphor in STEM education from a factory model to an ecosystem model. This Ecosystem model aspires towards an organic and healthy environment that nurtures students, faculty, and staff to become individuals fulfilled professionally and personally. She is also a co-advisor to Engineers without Borders and Critical Global Engagement at Cal Poly.Dr. Chance Hoellwarth, California Polytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo American
students of varying backgrounds and varying levels of classroom performance into the same educational process. Ideally, each student should receive personalized support that is tailored to their specific learning style. However, with limited resources and time available to educators and teaching facilities, personalized support is often infeasible. To address this issue, this project focuses on a learning system that uses artificially intelligent agents to provide students with personalized feedback and support. To further engage students, the system is built on top of an existing narrative game environment called Gridlock. Gridlock provides students with a narrative game experience that focuses on creating
engineering programs and has guidedengineering education for over 75 years. Although the particulars of the process are subject toannual changes, the overall thrust of the endeavor remains the same documentation ofprocesses that assess and continually review how well program outcomes and performancecriteria are being met. As a result of this need for accountability engineering departments have struggled to put inplace effective means of program assessment based on direct measures. Direct evidence, in theform of student projects, exams, reports, and other measures, are used to substantiate the ga c ai ha i c e a e bei g a i fac i e. ABET requires specific evidence that engineering programs have enabled a series of 11abi i ie
Manager Design; Produc- tion Engineer; Quality Control Engineer). On top of his experience as a researcher/academician, he has been actively involved in research and accreditation work related to engineering education. His technical research areas are Applied materials and manufacturing; Applied mechanics and design; Reliability engi- neering; and Engineering education. As part of the Applied Mechanics and Advanced Materials Research group (AM2R) at SQU, he has been involved in different applied research funded projects in excess of 4 million dollars. He has over 200 research/technical publications to his credit (research monographs/books, edited book volumes, a 5-volume encyclopedia, book chapters, refereed journal
Paper ID #29876Understanding better young people’s views on technology in FinlandDr. Johanna Kristiina Naukkarinen, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT Johanna Naukkarinen received her M.Sc. degree in chemical engineering from Helsinki University of Technology in 2001, her D.Sc. (Tech) degree in knowledge management from Tampere University of Technology in 2015, and her professional teacher qualification from Tampere University of Applied sci- ences in 2013. She is currently working as a post-doctoral researcher and project manager with the School of Energy Systems at Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology
Institute of Technology Simo Pajovic is a graduate student in the MIT Department of Mechanical Engineering, where his research focuses on nanoscale transport phenomena. In 2019, he graduated from the University of Toronto with a B.ASc. in Mechanical Engineering. His capstone project was to design and prototype a benchtop universal testing machine for educational use. As an undergraduate research assistant, he worked on micromechanical characterization of lubricants used in aerospace applications and later designing and prototyping medical devices.Mr. Cheuk Yin Larry Kei, University of Toronto Larry Kei obtained his BASc in Civil Engineering at the University of Toronto in 2019. He is currently working in the
master’s degree in Engineering Management from Eastern Michigan University. Prior to employment in higher education, Mr. Mumford worked in manufacturing operations and integrated product development within the commercial vehicles and aerospace and defense industries for three Fortune 500 Companies. His professional achievements include being certified as a manufacturing engineer, quality engineer and enterprise integrator. He has also received global quality achievement awards for process innovation and project execution.Mrs. Linda A Thurman, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Ms. Thurman, a Chicago native, earned her B.S. in Psychology from Western Illinois University and her M.A. in Industrial/Organizational
have even proposed shifts in pedagogy such as ageometrical approach with measured increases in class performance [1]. Another attempt attransforming electromagnetics came from augmenting the course with a team-based project-based learning approach where it was found that student attitudes about relevance improved, butknowledge gain remained like traditional lecture topics. [6]. All these methods from theliterature point to an increase in student motivation, but do not show a discernable change inknowledge gain as proven by a rigorously developed exam.Ideally, one can apply a nationally standardized exam to measure such knowledge gain. There issome evidence of the existence of such exams within engineering disciplines [7], but the authoris not
forsupporting students through their design challenges, and review of curriculum. The trainingmaterials to support our continuous improvement includes items about human subject research,research with minors, and the Authors’ research philosophy and study protocols.Continuous ImprovementThe summer engineering makerspace experience is a design-based research project where theprogram undergoes iterative design, development, and test cycles each summer to improve theinterventions effectiveness. Because of this continuous improvement process, our design-basedresearch intends to achieve three objectives: (1) identify key elements of the intervention, (2)deepen the researcher’s understanding of phenomena, and (3) uses prior research to describe andjustify the
in appreciation of course relevance of both theengineering course and composition course. This project is significant as the results from thisstudy will be used to better design and link interdisciplinary curriculum and leverage topics inand between all cohorted classes.IntroductionThe importance of writing and communication skills to the academic and professional pursuits offuture engineers is well established. ABET lists an “ability to communicate with a range ofaudiences” as a student outcome for the accreditation of undergraduate engineering programs[1].Writing specialists have long sought to identify and develop “reliable ways” of helping studentsprepare for the writing situations they will likely encounter as engineers [2, p. 318]. Yet
Paper ID #35175Work in Progress: Spatial Visualization Assessment and Training in theGrainger College of Engineering at the University of IllinoisDr. Brian S. Woodard, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Dr. Woodard received his Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign in 2011. His Aerospace research interests currently focus on the effects of icing on the aero- dynamics of swept-wing aircraft. In engineering education, he is interested in project-based learning and spatial visualization. He teaches courses at the University of Illinois where he serves as the Director of
software engineering from Southern Methodist Uni- versity and his bachelor’s degree in computer science from Texas A&M. Before joining Texas A&M, he worked at Ericsson (now Sony-Ericsson) in the network development and Digital Switch Corporation, and Motorola in cellular infrastructure development, project management and technical marketing. He also owned a company that developed custom networked and computer-controlled automation equipment.Dr. Karan Watson P.E., Texas A&M University Karan L. Watson, Ph.D., P.E., is currently a Regents Senior Professor of Electrical and Computer Engi- neering, having joined the faculty at Texas A&M University in 1983 as an Assistant Professor. She is also serving as the
projects. Onthe first group, the author used the standard approach of presenting the microcontroller, discussand explain how to program it. Although in the end students were able to use the microcontrollerin their project, they always had many questions to ask. The second group realized very latethat they would need a microcontroller, so the author had to prep[are also a special training; thatis when the author used the approach presented in this paper. The first group of students wereinvited again to sit in this session. After six days of discussing microcontrollers, al;l studentswere satisfied and with the knowledge, and continued working independently to the end of thesemester. Although no statistical data was collected to evaluate the student
dynamics and control, process control, energy conversion, and thermal fluids laboratory at the Houston Engineering Center. He also has been advisor and mentor to several senior design project groups.Dr. Andres C Garcia, The University of Texas at TylerMr. Benjamin Lee Stilwell, The University of Texas at TylerMr. Jongin Aaron Sithideth, The University of Texas at Tyler Graduating Mechanical Engineering candidate from the University of Texas at Tyler with ambitious lead- ership and dynamic interpersonal skills. He has completed a research internship for a Fortune 1000 company, an internship for a process heating manufacturer, and managed a team of 7 solidifying work structure within the organization. His passions include
projects • Materials addressing issues arising from the team’s review of the Self-Study Report or online instructional materials • Documentation of actions taken by the program after submission of the Self-Study Report as being available for review, and • Materials necessary for the program to demonstrate compliance with the criteria and policiesThe programs should confer with PEV to ensure that display materials will provide adequate evidenceof meeting the accreditation criteria.About two months prior to the on-site virtual visit, the program reviewed in fall 2020 provided thePEV access to an on-line OneDrive folder that contained the following electronic binders. 1. Course Binder: this binder contained some or all of the
scale, disparate data. He is currently working on a project that ambitions to design a system capable of providing students customized motivational stimuli and performance feedback based on their affective states.Dr. Conrad Tucker, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Tucker holds a joint appointment as Assistant Professor in Engineering Design and Industrial En- gineering at The Pennsylvania State University. He is also affiliate faculty in Computer Science and Engineering. He teaches Introduction to Engineering Design (EDSGN 100) at the undergraduate level and developed and taught a graduate-level course titled Data Mining–Driven Design (EDSGN 561). As part of the Engineering Design Program’s ”Summers
optimization of intelligent systems through the acquisition, integration, and mining of large scale, disparate data. He is currently working on a project that ambition to design a sys- tem capable of providing students customized motivational stimuli and performance feedback based on their affective states.Dr. Conrad Tucker, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Tucker holds a joint appointment as Assistant Professor in Engineering Design and Industrial En- gineering at The Pennsylvania State University. He is also affiliate faculty in Computer Science and Engineering. He teaches Introduction to Engineering Design (EDSGN 100) at the undergraduate level and developed and taught a graduate-level course titled
achieving underserved students differ by gender? 2. How do their computing identities differ by field (CS, IT, CE)? 3. How do their computing identities differ by first year versus upper class status?2 BACKGROUNDNational attention to retaining U.S. prominence on the global stage has precipitated a necessity togarner interest, enrollment, and subsequent graduation of computing majors. The demand for atechnologically trained workforce far outpaces the growth. After all, computing is projected tocontinue to grow at a rate of 17% from 2014-2024, much faster than the average for alloccupations [2]. This urgency has prompted an expansion in literature on understanding theengagement of women, underrepresented minorities, and diverse socio
Professor in Industrial and Manufac- turing Engineering at Cal Poly, SLO. In her current role she overseas Engineering Students Services and diversity effort in the college. Coming from a 24 year career of practicing innovative pedagogies from Project based learning to flipped classrooms, she now works to transform the institution of high education through structures and practices.Dr. Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jane Lehr is Chair of the Women’s & Gender Studies Department and a Professor in Ethnic Studies at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. She is also the Faculty Director of the Cal Poly Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority and Underrepresented
author found that somepredictors of success for women were related to frequency of working on group projects while formen it had to do with satisfaction with math and science coursework and the opportunity to conductresearch. It appeared that the college environment was a greater predictor of success compared tobackground characteristics or precollege experiences. The study also indicated that the collegeenvironment makes students less sure of their motivation to achieve. This may indicate that despitelack of academic preparation, these students can achieve success if the college climate issupportive and conducive to success. Strayhorn [12] summarized his study on the social barriers and supports for URM studentsin STEM fields based upon
undergraduate elective at California State University,Sacramento that focuses on the design of steel structures for civil engineering majors. Thiscourse meets twice a week for 75 minutes and has 29 meetings over the 15 week semester. Oneclass period is spent on the midterm exam and another 2 hour time period beyond the 15 weeksemester is spent on the final exam. The course covers content regarding the analysis and designof tension members, compression members, beams, beam-columns, and connections in steelstructures. Students in both sections engage in an open-ended service learning project, completenine in-class conceptual quizzes, are provided with suggested homework problem sets andsolutions (not graded), and have access to examples with solutions
online discussion forums were delivered through a course web site in the university learningmanagement system (UVaCollab, collab.itc.virginia.edu). Some aspects of the grade were basedon activities that could be compared to the traditional lecture course: homework problems (25%of the grade), in-class test problems (25% of the grade), and a final exam (15% of the grade).Students also worked in teams to complete a “grand challenge project” (25% of the grade) thatconsisted of a series of assignments of increasing complexity addressing methods to deliverchemotherapeutic drug to a tumor in a patient. Finally, students completed daily formativeassessments in a category called, “Help Yourself Learn” (10% of the grade). Examples of theselow-stakes
(Michigan State University Outreach and Engagement). She is involved in usability evaluations, focus groups, and information architecture projects for MSU and external clients. Her research areas include effects of cooperative online learning, interventions based on cognitive flexibility theory for read- ing to learn on the web, and student motivation and achievement in flipped classrooms. Hannah holds a B.A. in Psychology from the University of Bonn, a M.A. in Communication from the University of Missouri, and a Ph.D. in both Communication and Educational Psychology and Educational Technology from Michigan State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Using
in STEM fields. 1,2,3 . Under the umbrella of active learning,however, a large variety of different (and sometimes contradictory) methodologies have beenproposed; including project-based learning, problem-based learning, gamification, tinkering,collaborative learning, class competitions, and many others. As educators become more interestedin student-centered pedagogies, the question of which specific techniques are most effective isincreasingly important.Because active learning is still an emerging paradigm, the number of studies examining distinctapproaches is somewhat limited, and the difficulty of isolating those techniques in the classroomenvironment is a recognized concern. 1 In this paper, we wish to contribute to the growing pool
Paper ID #19152Work in Progress: A Delphi Study to Investigate the Value of Board Gamesto Teach Teamwork SkillsDr. Kevin Ray Hadley, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Dr. Hadley received his BS in Chemical Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines and his PhD in Chemical Engineering at Vanderbilt University. At Vanderbilt, he also completed their teaching certificate program and was the first participant to publish the results of his project in a national peer-reviewed journal, Chemical Engineering Education. Afterwards, Dr. Hadley completed a postdoctoral study at NASA. IN 2012, he joined the faculty at South
engineering) along with composition-studies experts from the UndergraduateRhetoric Program. The team developed a course designed to focus on introducing engineers torelevant genres and types of writing prominent in many engineering disciplines. The “Writing inEngineering Fields” course, designed to mirror in structure and delivery the university’s first-year composition course (Table 1), aims to inculcate these skills in a single semester.Our team developed the course in one semester by meeting every two weeks to discuss contentand provide feedback on drafted material. Throughout the development and offering, two teammembers (our graduate TAs—one from English and one from Engineering) were essential inpromoting the success of the project. These TAs
have been progressivelyutilized as general purpose GPU (GPGPU). They are used to improve the performance of manyapplications such as multimedia 16, EDA 17, numeric algorithm 18. This paper is written tomotivate and inspire engineering students in taking up projects in this particular domain. Thisdomain of study is at the research level in many universities and thus there is very limited scopefor teaching in class. However, as the topic is booming in the market there is always a scope fordoing wide range of study or projects in this domain. We would like to share our survey on thisdomain as it may be a guide or motivation for many engineering students. The increasingcomputational power of GPGPU’s makes it a solution for high performance