aspects of entrepreneurship and innovation. E-Teams are used toprovide interdisciplinary team building experience so that the engineering students learn to workwith other professions. The students are introduced to the extensive entrepreneur ecosystemavailable to them so that those that have viable ideas or just have the drive can pursue their ideasfor products and businesses.References 1. Blank, Steve & Dorf, Bob. (2012). The Startup Owner’s Manual: The Step-By-Step Guide for Building a Great Company. K & S Ranch. 2. Osterwalder, Alexander & Pigneur, Yves. (2010). Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. John Wiley and Sons. 3. Blank
Paper ID #12812Less is More: Developing complex designs using a minimal HDL subset in anintroductory digital devices laboratoryDr. Bryan A. Jones, Mississippi State University Bryan A. Jones (S’00–M’00) received the B.S.E.E. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering from Rice University, Houston, TX, in 1995 and 2002, respectively, and the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineer- ing from Clemson University, Clemson, SC, in 2005. He is currently an Assistant Professor with the Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS. From 1996 to 2000, he was a Hardware Design Engineer with Compaq, where he specialized in board
: Fundamentals of Project Delivery, Principles ofDesign-Build Project Delivery and Post-Award Design-Build Project Delivery3. Fundamentals ofProject Delivery “provides a general overview of the attributes of all the major project deliverysystems, procurement methodologies and contracting approaches”, Principles of Design-BuildProject Delivery “addresses the use of design-build as a project delivery method, focusing onessential concepts and characteristics, as well as critical elements of the RFQ/RFP process andoverall project management”, and Post-Award Design-Build Project Delivery “provide[s] anoverview of the construction and design-build contract management processes that are importantas the construction phase ramps up” 3.The course also included
Technology Programs 2014-2015”. ABET Engineering Technology Accreditation Commission. 2013.9. BKCASE Editorial Board. 2014. The Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK), v. 1.3. R.D. Adcock (EIC). Hoboken, NJ: The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology. Accessed 1/31/2015. www.sebokwiki.org.10. Kay, Jennifer S. "Teaching Robotics from a Computer Science Perspective." Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 19.2 (2003): 329-336. Page 26.1086.9
department and is an advocate of using hands-on-learning tools to help develop strong math, science and engineering foundations.Dr. Joel M Bach, Colorado School of Mines Associate Professor, Mechanical Engineering, Colorado School of Mines Page 26.1089.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Letting students learn through making mistakes: Teaching hardware and software early in an academic career.IntroductionIt is difficult in today’s society to teach students that it is indeed acceptable to fail at something,as long as you can learn from that initial (or many) attempt(s
staff in a unique experience that becomes thevalue each person takes away with them.The authors are happy to provide any documentation, details, key learnings, or other material tothose interested in implementing an Intensive Innovation Experience.References[1] S. A. Ambrose, "Undergraduate Engineering Curriculum - The Ultimate Design Challenge," The Bridge, pp. 16-23, 2013.[2] R. Stephens, "Aligning Engineering Education and Experience to Meet the Needs of Industry and Page 26.1107.6 Society," The Bridge, pp. 31-34, 2013.Page 26.1107.7
(when they experienced them) were creative andfun. They often found that the engineering projects may have been interesting but were also rigidto some extent and lacked creativity. Students had mixed thoughts on the mathematics course,where some students explicitly expressed their dissatisfaction with the content and the method bywhich the class was taught.References[1] Jonassen, D., J. Strobel, and C.B. Lee," Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators", J. Eng. Educ. Vol. 95, No. 2, 2006, pp. 139-151.[2] Wedelin, D., T. Adawi, T. Jahan, and S. Andersson," Investigating and developing engineering students’ mathematical modelling and problem- solving skills", European Journal of Engineering
( i = 0; i < part_cnt; i++ ){ if( part_variability[i] == 'V' ) part_tolerance[i] -= wiggle_room;; } // now that the tolerances are adjusted, time for the dimensions wiggle_room = ((gap_max - gap_min)/2.0 - gap_mean) / variable_part_cnt; for( i = 0; i < part_cnt; i++ ){ if( part_variability[i] == 'V' ) part_nominal[i] += wiggle_room * part_sign[i]; } update_gap(); return NO_ERROR;}///////////////////////// Functions for Phase IIIint monte_carlo(){ FILE *fp_in, *fp_out; double gap_size; printf("\nDoing Monte Carlo Calcs and dumping to file [%s] \n", OUTPUT_FILE_NAME); if( ( fp_out = fopen( OUTPUT_FILE_NAME , "w" ) ) != NULL ){ for(int i = 0; i < SIMULATION_STEPS; i
science teachers. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 5(1), 85–103.[10] Mazumder, Q. H., & Karim, R. M. (2012). Comparative Analysis of Learning Styles of Students of USA and Bangladesh, Paper no: AC2012-5075, 119th ASEE Annual Conference, June 10-13, 2012, San Antonio, TX, USA[11] Oxford, R. L., and Chien-Yu L. (2011) "Autonomous learners in digital realms: Exploring strategies for effective digital language learning." Independent language learning: Building on experience, seeking new perspectives 1 (2011): 157.[12] Zimmerman, B. J., and Dale H. S. (2011) eds. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. Taylor & Francis, 2011
Science Foundation CAREER Award. He is grateful to have been awarded the Weidman Pro- fessorship in Leadership and to have recently been recognized with BYU’s Technology Transfer Award.Dr. Ruth Ochia P.E., Temple University Ruth S. Ochia received the B.S. degree in biomedical engineering from The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, in 1992 and the Ph.D. degree in bioengineering from the University of Washington, Seat- tle, WA, in 2000. From 2000 to 2002, she was a Post-doctoral Fellow in the Center of Locomotion Studies, at The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA. From 2002 to 2006, she was a Post- doctoral Fellow and then Assistant Professor at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL. From 2006
). Third dimension line: distances between the grid lines Fourth dimension: overall dimension of the building. p. Tags: Tags, in sequential order, must be included for all the doors, windows and rooms (room name, number and room area). Rooms shall be renamed to reflect their usage, e.g. Conference Room, Office, etc. (2 points) q. 3D Camera View: Create a view looking from the front of the building. (2 points) r. Sheets: At least two sheets must be created, one for the floor plans and one for the elevation and section plans. (2 points) s. Exterior Rendering: A realistic exterior view shall be created at a “medium” detail level, and saved to as a JPG file. (2 points) t. Create a Walkthrough: starting from
/services/technology-development/smart-grid/role-microgrids-helping-advance-nation-s-energy-system Page 26.1503.11
to teach Software Engineering, ICSE, May 2008, Leipzig, Germany, pp 777-786[8] Papadopoulos, C. and Roman, S.A. (2010), Implementing and Inverted Classroom Model in Engineering Statics: Intial Results, the ASEE 2010Annual Conference, June 20 - 23, 2010, Louisville, Kentucky[9] Bland, L. (2006), Apply Flip/Inverted Classroom Model in Electrical Engineering to Establish Life-long Learning, the ASEE2006 Annual Conference 2006. Chicago, IL.[10] Kellogg, S. (2009) Developing Online Materials to Facilitate and Inverted Classroom Approach, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Session T3F, San Antonio, TX.[11] Rais-Rohani, M., Walters, A., and Vizzini, A., Emporium Based Redesign of Statics: An Innovative Approach to
SREB-member states(Doctoral dissertation, TEXAS A&MUNIVERSITY-COMMERCE).San Jose State University (2015) https://bcme.sjsu.edu/BME%204%20Year%20PlanThe Economist (2012) “One State Two Systems”, August 11, 2012http://www.economist.com/node/21560290THECB (2014) Closing the Gaps 2014 Progress Reporthttp://www.thecb.state.tx.us/reports/PDF/5924.PDF?CFID=20361408&CFTOKEN=17353582THECB (2015)http://www.txhighereddata.org/Interactive/Institutionsshow.cfm?Type=1&Level=1Tienda, Marta and Sullivan, Teresa, (2015) “Texas Higher Education Opportunity Project”http://texastop10.princeton.edu/project.pdf, http://theop.princeton.edu/US Census (2015) http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.htmlZweben, S., & Bizot, B. (2014). 2013 Taulbee
cell phones and other portable consumer electronicsat the rate of 500mA into a USB port. This kit comes with all of the specified parts and athrough-hole circuit board on which to mount them. Consistent with Limor Fried’s designphilosophy, the entire kit, schematic, and instructions are “open source”. Figure 1 shows acompleted and functioning Minty Boost®. Figure 2 is the open source schematic. There arereadily common, recognizable circuits within this schematic, such as a boost converter, voltagedividers for analog address security and decoding, analog filtering and decoupling, andappropriate and effective grounding connections. s Figure 2. Schematic of the Minty Boost® power electronic converter circuit2Complete parts list
proudly to the professor, they are surprised to hear that they have all made a crucial mistake. It is rare for any of the students to visit the professor’s office or ask the professor any questions about what s/he wants in seating (i.e., they do not talk to any users or the client). It is even more rare for the students to generalize the problem and ask the professor why they think they need more seating (maybe they do not – maybe the best solution is a way to hold office hours online?) or to talk to students who have sat in the office to see what they want in a chair. The bottom line is clear to the students: when left
anvil. as follows: a. Place one of the specimens in the heavy-duty vise (in the welding area, not the machining area) and firmly secure the part. b. Using pliers or vise grips, hold the second sample at right angles to the vise-secured samples (Figure 2B). A second lab team member hammers 5 blows of similar force to drive the Figure 2B. Chisel-testing at the heavy-duty samples into each other. vise. 2. Data Collection a. Observe which parts yield and split which other part(s). Measure the yield length (of the indentation made by the winning chisel). b. Take Rockwell hardness measurements at 1/8 inch (or less
the students’ instruction, sothat educators can focus more on the material and the students who need more individualattention. Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) are such systems that provide instructions to usersof the learning system with little to no intervention from the instructor. The major goal of all ITSis to supplement or replace a human tutor’s interaction with the student, sharing theresponsibility with instructors for the type of modeling, coaching and scaffolding needed forguided learning. Typically, ITS systems seek to identify a student’s strengths and weaknesses,offering help where needed either during questioning or after. Popular ITS systems such asAutotutor (S. D’mello and A. Graesser, 2012) have proven to be highly
equipment and less on labor – especially less skilled entry level labor.By the 1990’s the typical surveying firm was using total stations with electronic data collectorsfor field surveys and computers to perform calculations and to plot maps. Fewer technicianswere needed in the office for drafting and computations and the typical field crew was nowreduced to two people. Although there was less need for entry level labor on surveying fieldcrews, an inexperienced and minimally proficient surveying student or recent graduate was still avaluable member of a surveying crew, so long as the other crew member was well experiencedand skilled.But the pace of change in surveying technology has increased rapidly in the last 20 years and iscontinuing to
Colorado Boulder’sAssociate Dean of Inclusive Excellence Jacquelyn Sullivan and GoldShirt Program DirectorTanya Ennis for their guidance and encouragement throughout the development of theWashington STARS in Engineering Program.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate 10K+STEP Grant under Grant No. 1317246 & 1317349.Any opinion, finding, and conclusion or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.1 Great Jobs Within Our Reach: Solving the Problem of Washington state’s growing job skills gap. The BostonConsultancy Group and the Washington Roundtable. March 2013.2 Brower, Aaron M., and Karen K
successful demonstrations in high-school classrooms as well aspotential remote laboratory use. Additionally, further development of the pen tablet controlalgorithm can be explored to determine if the pressure sensitive Z-axis control method is suitablefor precise laboratory applications or only general classroom use.1. E. Zamani, G. Giaglis, and A. Pouloudi, "Tactile Experiences: User Interpretations and Meaning with Tablets," presented at the International Conference on System Science, Waikoloa, HI, 2014.2. C. Romney, "Tablet PC Use in Freshman Mathematics Classes Promotes STEM Retention," presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference, Rapid City, SD, 2011.3. S. Oviatt, A. Arthur, and J. Cohen, "Quiet Interfaces
officers—on how to go about seeking research funding. It does notdiscuss individual programs, though it does offer some suggestions for finding them.Rather, it concentrates on finding out about funding opportunities and building a personalnetwork to enable oneself to compete effectively for them.The first step in getting funded is to come up with an idea. The next step is to find anagency that is interested in the area. Then the researcher must make a credible case that(s)he can make a contribution in the area. Sometimes this is through a single-investigatorproposal, but more and more frequently, it is as a member of a team. In the latter case,networking is crucial.2. The ideaA good research topic must have many qualities. It must be inventive. An
Page 26.1639.14paperProceduresFigure 3: first stageThe first stage is triggered by group 2’s projectAfter triggered by group 2, we can assume the initial speed of the ball is v0 = 0 𝑚/𝑠.The second stage will happen when the plastic ball begins swinging. During the second stage, theplastic ball on the top would perform free fall with a string attached. Thus the projectile of theplastic ball will be circular. Since the team assume the initial condition of the ball is v0 = 0 𝑚/𝑠,thus at the beginning of second stage, the total energy is just potential energy where PE = mghwhere m is the mass of the plastic ball and h is the initial height of the ball. After the plastic ballfalls at the bottom location, it will swing back up and collide with a
.” Proceedings, 2010 ASEE Annual Conference.6. Mendoza-Garcia, J.A., Ngambeki, I.B., Behbehani, L.J., Evangelou, D., Rao, P.S.C., Cox, M.F. “Defining the Knowledge and Skills that Enable Engineers to Participate in Public Policy.” Proceedings, 2012 ASEE Annual Conference.7. Tull, K., and Jones, S. “A Sophomore-Level Engineering and Public Policy Course Required for B.A. Engineering Majors at Lafayette College.” Proceedings, 2006 ASEE Annual Conference.8. Ngambeki, I.B., Depew, D.R., Dark, M.J., and Chong, R.C. “Approaches to Integrating Policy into Engineering Education.” Proceedings, 2013 ASEE Annual Conference.9. Denny, F.I., and Robinson, R.L. “The Engineer’s Role in Public Policy.” Proceedings, 2003 ASEE Annual
. Page 26.1670.8Appendix A: K-12 Outreach instructionsOutreach Activity: Robotics andControl using LEGO MINDSTORMSNXT Activity 1:Objective: Build and program a robot (wheeled car) to drive into a space and exit asquickly as possible without touching the wall.1. Build the basic configuration. (see attached instructions). Connect the motors of the wheels through a cable to the motor ports (A, B, or C)2. Decide which sensor(s) your robot will need to complete the task. A description of each sensor and its function is attached. Connect the sensor through a cable to the sensor ports (1, 2, 3, or 4).3. Get into the “NXT program” on the panel. a. Turn on the panel by pressing the orange button b. Scroll right until you get to
Page 26.1673.13and Management Technology (ICEMT), 2010 International Conference on (pp. 362 - 366). IEEE ConferencePublications.5 Lawrence-Slater, M. (2002). On-line learning: a student viewpoint. Frontiers in Education, 2002. FIE 2002. 32ndAnnual . 1, pp. T1E-19 - T1E-24 vol.1 . IEEE Conference Publications.6 Aippersbach, S, Alley, M., Garner, J. (2013)" How Slide Design Affects a Student Presenter’s Understanding ofthe Content ." 2013 ASEE Annual Conference. American Society for Engineerin Education, 2013.7 Jones, R., Plemmons, K., (2007) Addressing the Career Development Needs of Experienced Project Professionals,AC2007-1283, 2007 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition8 Tian, Z; Abraham, J. (2014) Application of computational fluid
Paper ID #12482Using the Engineering Grand Challenges to Foster Critical Thinking andAwareness of the Engineer’s Role in the Global CommunityDr. Angela Thompson P.E., University of Louisville Dr. Angela Thompson is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Louisville. Dr. Thompson received her PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Louisville. Her research interests are in biomechanics and engineering education, particularly related to critical thinking instruction.Dr. Patricia A Ralston, University of Louisville Dr. Patricia A. S. Ralston is Professor and
Burmank, Visual Literacy: Learn to See, See to Learn. Association for Supervision and CurriculumDevelopment, ISBN 0871206404, p. 115, 2002 .5 H David, C Carr, and H Yueh, Computers as Mindtools for Engaging Learners in Critical Thinking. TechTrends43(2), pp. 24-32, 1998.6 D Jonassen and B Grabowski, Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning and Instruction, Lawrence Erlbaum, Page 26.1193.10 Hillsdale, NJ, 1993.7 R Felder and L Silverman, Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education, Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681, 1988.8 S Montgomery, Addressing Diverse Learning Styles Through the Use of Multimedia
, K. (2007). Doctorate Recipients from United StatesUniversities: Summary Report 2006. Chicago, IL.4. Martin B., & Hanington BM. (2012) Universal Methods of Design: 100 Ways to Research Complex Problems,Develop Innovative Ideas, and Design Effective Solutions. Rockport Publishers5. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage Publications.6. National Science Foundation, & National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2012). Characteristicsof Doctoral Scientists and Engineers in the United States: 2008 (pp. 1–83). Arlington, VA. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nsf.gov/statistics /nsf13302/.7. National Science Foundation, & Statistics., N. C. for S. and E
variety of institutions across the US and those in the queue clearlyhold a positive view in regards to attaining tenure.References 1. Varma, R. (2004). “The tenure system and engineering institutions.” Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 20-23, Salt Lake City, UT. 2. McKenzie, R. (1996). “In Defense of Academic Tenure.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 152(2), 325-341. 3. Sowell, T. (1993). Inside American Education: The Decline, the Deception, the Dogmas. Free Press: New York. 4. Aigner, D. (1993). “Quality Revolution due at Universities.” Orange County Register, July 25, B10. 5. Epstein, R. and S. MacLane (1991). “Keep Mandatory Retirement for Tenured Faculty