researchPeople use AI tools for many things. Although it seems that AI tools can be a wining tool forstudents to use, students mentioned many drawbacks to the program such as: Makes students lazy Gives false information Acts only as a safety net. Still need to check work.Question 4The students that use AI tools mentioned that they mostly use Chatboxes to understand topics,better classroom learning, deeper understanding on topics, problem solving, and writing. Studentsbelieve that AI tools still have a long way to go to become what they need in problem solving,design opportunities, project feasibility, and to also be taught in class. Only 22% of the studentsstated that it has influenced their understanding of engineering concepts
- Telecommunication3GPP – 3- Group Partnership ProjectCDMA- Carrier Division Multiple AccessEDGE- Enhanced Data rate for GSM EvolutionSMS - Short Message ServiceMMS – Multimedia ServicesGSM- Global System for Mobile CommunicationGPRS- General Packet Radio ServicesIMT-2000 – Internal Mobile Telecommunication – 2000DARPA- Defense Advanced Research Project AgencyOFDM – Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX Copyright 2022, American Society for Engineering Education 2UDM- Unified Data ManagementAMF- Access Mobility ManagementSMF
plan to transform the state’s workforce into a better skilled, highly employable group that could compete and thrive in the projected 2030 Marketplace.[1]. Marketable skills backed up with a higher education degree or appropriate certificate obtained through education and/or training that included verifiable skills was projected to push Texas into a leader in innovation and economic growth and a model to be followed by the rest of the nation.The 60x30TX Plan calls for 60% of Texas to have a university degree or a marketable certificate bythe year 2030 and those goals are considered necessary for the State to remain competitive andpotentially lead the way and serve as an example to the rest of the nation. Per the State’s 60x30TXwebsite [1
Values, Modules Lab 10, 10b 11 (11/5-11/9) Writing Functions, Scope Lab 11, 11b 12 (11/12-11/16) Functions and use in top-down/bottom-up design Lab 12, 12b 13 (11/19-11/20 ) Systematic Debugging Lab 13, Team Project assigned 14 (11/26-11/30) Topic TBD 15 (12/3-12/5) Last exam Finals Week NO FINAL Team Project due MethodsThe new engineering course's curriculum redesign was already complete. The purpose of this workwas to establish a pilot program to
preferred not to state their gender.Students were asked to answer the following questions that will be analyzed in thispaper: 1. Have you considered going to graduate school? 2. Among your friends who are also undergraduate students in the department, how many of them are considering graduate school? 3. What do you think is your greatest obstacle for attending graduate school? (Select all that apply) 4. Do you think you receive enough information on research opportunities, such as research internships, research projects etc.? 5. Where do you learn about the research opportunities? (Select all that apply) 6. Have you participated in the following events? (Select all that apply) 7. What is your main source of information on
2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings Improving Access to Engineering Education: Unlocking Text and Table Data in Images and Videos Uchechukwu Uche-Ike Lawrence Angrave University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign uuchei2@illinois.eduAbstract Accessibility of media, including visual media, is a significant concern in creatingengineering education that is inclusive and accessible; without access, students who are blind orhave low vision are unable to learn from today’s engineering materials. This project presents anew accessibility tool, implemented as a user
0% 40% 60% 5 0% 30% 70% 6 10% 0% 90% 7 0% 0% 100%ConclusionsThe results of assessment are very encouraging for the efficacy of inexpensive lab exercises forteaching Programmable Logic Controller content to engineering students. While expensivetest-beds are shiny and exciting, the measurable improvement in student understanding withmuch less-expensive and less-refined test beds is exciting.Future work on this project will include refining the existing pneumatic finite state
for engineering educators to leverageinvolvement in entrepreneurship education through an activity and a potential paper related tobest teaching practices on their P&T portfolio documents. It is recommended that engineeringschools and colleges offer these experiences, especially for engineering instructors formallytrained in technical and disciplinary areas. Anecdotal evidence suggests this approach works for the following reasons. First, itpromotes accountability. Second, it allows for networking. Third, it encourages collaborationsacross projects. Fourth, the virtual nature of the program increases accessibility and equity. Fifth,there are multiple incentives (in addition to the four previously mentioned), including a stipendand
from her experience design surgical instru- ments in the medical device industry, leading diversity and outreach initiatives for MIT’s Office of Engi- neering Outreach, and launching STEM programs in Design Thinking, Computer Science, and Robotics at a K-12 charter school. As an engineering educator and researcher, she is passionate about breaking down barriers and transforming engineering into a more inclusive field. In addition, her teaching focuses on the implementation of authentic project-based learning to develop students’ 21st century skills such as collaboration and ill-structured problem-solving. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Conceptual Framework
. Allowing students theopportunity to gain confidence in their ability by quickly learning coding andapplying introductory programming concepts could help them to master theseconcepts more quickly and defer programming environment set up to a later date.Accelerating the learning of programming may help to offset future needs, asgrowth in software development jobs is projected to significantly outpace growthin instructional jobs in computer science. This study implemented two versions ofthe same course content in self-paced and instructor-led formats. The instructor-led format included the delivery of online lectures combined with examples andpractice exercises. This was considered a more traditional approach wherestudents were taught using slides
method from the student perspective across multiple programs attwo universities, one in the US and one in the EU.2. DescriptionA study using a survey design was conducted to evaluate student experiences with andperceptions of the remote-synchronous course delivery method during the COVID-19 pandemicacross programs in engineering (civil, computer, electrical, environmental, and sustainablesystems), architecture, and construction project management, at two universities, MSU Denverand University of Pécs. The composition of the responding students by major is shown inFigure 1. Figure 1. Respondents by majorIn this paper, the outcomes pertaining to three of the study’s survey questions are presented andevaluated. The
the results fromprior studies [16] will corroborate our findings about the correlation between a growth mindset(general intelligence) and instructional practices.The study findings will help assess faculty mindsets in different domains and may support thedesign of targeted faculty development interventions.AcknowledgmentsThis project was funded by the Mentorship 360 Project at Arizona State University as part of theKern Entrepreneurship Education Network (KEEN).References[1] The Royal Academy of Engineering, Educating Engineers for the 21st Century, The Royal Academy of Engineering, London, pp. 1–37, 2007. Accessed on 13 June 2016 from http://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/reports/educatingengineers-21st-century[2] Australian
in US waters. He was recognized as an Advisor of the Year Award nominee among 8 other UNI faculty members in 2010- 2011 academic year Leadership Award Ceremony. Dr. Pecen received a Milestone Award for outstanding mentoring of graduate students at UNI, and recognition from UNI Graduate College for acknowledging the milestone that has been achieved in successfully chairing ten or more graduate student culminating projects, theses, or dissertations, in 2011 and 2005. He was also nominated for 2004 UNI Book and Supply Outstanding Teaching Award, March 2004, and nominated for 2006, and 2007 Russ Nielson Service Awards, UNI. Dr. Pecen is an Engineering Tech- nology Editor of American Journal of Undergraduate
University (Mechanical En- gineering), and The University of Utah (in both Materials Science and Engineering, and Metallurgical Engineering). Nonacademic pursuits include tending his orchards (he’s a fruit philanthropist) and playing the piano.Dr. David G. Rethwisch, The University of Iowa Dr. Rethwisch is a professor of chemical and biochemical engineering at the University of Iowa. His current research interest is assessing the impact of secondary curricula (particularly problem/project based learning curricula) on student interest and pe ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A New Paradigm for Learning the Fundamentals of Materials
graduatingfrom high school are prepared to take university level courses in math and science. In 2022, theACT composite results fell to the lowest values since 1991. This generation of students is moredistressed, disengaged, digitally distracted, and discouraged when compared with previouscohorts.The purpose of this project is to identify the challenges faced by students transitioning from highschool to college after the COVID-19 pandemic. For this study, we are focused on the transitionof first-generation students as they experience their first semester in college. We believe that theCOVID-19 pandemic has caused significant shifts in the struggles and needs of incomingstudents. For the analysis, first semester students enrolled in an engineering
academicresources and maximizing opportunities in their college environment have a relationship withstudents’ academic achievement and the progress they make with their learning [1]–[3].Satisfaction with college outcomes has also been found to have a relationship with studentengagement in academic activities [4]. Active classroom learning strategies have facilitatedstudents’ involvement in course learning. Such pedagogical strategies that have improvedstudents’ engagement with course learning and academic achievement in engineering classroomsinclude project-based learning, problem-based learning, flipped classroom, cooperative learning,questions, and discussions [5], [6].Furthermore, it has been found that motivation has the strongest relationship with
loading domain: the currentcone can be found by passing the current force point with the apex lying on N axis. Theold cone is always being pushed along the loading path for every incremental step. Thereader is referred to Fig. 3 (a,b) for illustration of this process. For the loading domain: Rc = T . The rule is different for the incremental step being done in the unloadingdomain. The current cone is found passing both the current point and the turning point(where loading changes to unloading). Still the cone with the apex at the current forcepoint is the old cone. The old cone is always being pushed along the loading path forevery incremental step. The projection of the vector dF = Fcurrent − Fturning on the current N -plane is a diameter of the
temperature control system found in most homes. A control system keepsthe air in a home at a certain temperature. It does this by sensing the ambienttemperature, comparing it to the desired temperature, and producing a control action thatwill keep the ambient temperature at or near the desired temperature. This paperdescribes a project that involves designing, building, and demonstrating a regulatorycontrol system. The system will maintain the temperature of a process at a desired setpoint. Another goal is to incorporate a PC-based data acquisition system (DAQ) alongwith LabVIEW, a graphics-based programming language by National Instruments.LabVIEW has been used in many control systems applications [1-5].To demonstrate the functionality of the system
). Its purpose is to combine information literacy skills with thescientific method. It approaches the process of assessing sources by using the following steps: • Define context. • Find a source. • Use any Evaluative Framework (like CRAAP, RADAR, or CCOW). • Critique/Apply the Scientific Method.CEI can be used as an overall framework for finding and assessing literature intended to be usedin research projects [10]. In addition to the actual evaluation process, students are able todetermine the context of the information using their own knowledge of their profession. As theylearn more about their chosen discipline, they can use CEI to improve their information literacyskills [11]. CEI makes an effort to consider the needs of
was calculated on the 14-item scale, and the resultingAlpha value was .85. Furthermore, removing any of these items would not improvereliability of the scale. Preliminary data supports a four-factor solution.Phase II: VRI Item RevisionThe project is currently at this state. Additional items were written, as it was deemed thata 14-item scale would be too brief to adequately support reliability and validity of thisconstruct; bringing the total number of items to 39. These set of items, will beadministered to groups of undergraduate students from varying STEM majors. Followingthis, the KMO factor adequacy, MSA, Coefficient Alpha, and Factor Analysis will beconducted. Depending on these outcomes, some items on the scale may be deleted if theyare
Paper ID #37428A Mentorship and Module-Based System to Ensure the Adequacy of Re-quiredPrerequisite Knowledge for Enhancing Student Success in EngineeringDr. Ricardo Zaurin, University of Central FloridaDr. Sudeshna Pal, University of Central Florida Dr. Sudeshna Pal is an Associate Lecturer in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department at the University of Central Florida (UCF), where she teaches courses in the areas of system dynamics, controls, and biomedical engineering. Her current research focus is engineering education, including blended learning, project-based learning, and digital and design education. She co
reasonably expectthat most juniors have more practice and experience with computational tools than freshmen, andtherefore would have higher confidence in their abilities. Fig. 1. Plots depicting comparisons between NCS freshman and junior mean responses regardingprogramming/simulation self-efficacy (a) and valuation (b). For all questions relating to self-efficacy, the Likert scale translates to 1 = “Not at all confident” to 6 = “Extremely Confident.” For self-efficacy questions, the scale translates to 1 = “Strongly Disagree” to 6 = “Strongly Agree.”Our findings revealed a surprising similarity in NCS freshmen and junior mean responses related tomotivation and ability to strategize for programming and simulation-related projects
Alignment Model,In this paper, the authors attempted to investigate current engineering entrepreneurship educationthrough the lens of Constructive Alignment. We want to understand if this framework can capturethe nuts and bolts of the abovementioned diverse entrepreneurship education program designs. Theauthors proposed a modified model for the existing constructive alignment model to reflect thefeedback we received from the field.2. Methodology2.1 Data SourceTo obtain a comprehensive view of Canadian entrepreneurship education, we accessed the list ofdesignated educational institutions from the Canadian Federal government’s web tool provided byEmployment and Social Development Canada. We limited the scope of the project to educationalinstitutions
Paper ID #38515How much does readiness matter? An examination of student persistenceintention and engineering identityMr. Syahrul Amin, Texas A&M University Syahrul Amin is a PhD candidate in Curriculum and Instruction at Texas A&M University. He is Experi- enced in conducting numerous STEM education research projects and skilled in working in collaborative environments to collect and evaluate research data for a variety of STEM education projects. He is also experienced in K-16 teaching for over 8 years. His research interests focus on science education, engi- neering education, GT education, and international
categoryscores made fromthe participants’responses.Results and Future WorkThe author has used this activity in a few different quarters, but not yet formally studied if ithelped learners implement better weighted decision matrices in their later projects or if it workedbetter than other activities. Anecdotally, and through informally reviewing related assignments,while it led to good classroom discussions, there are areas for improvement.For example, having results from a form processed and presented just seconds after they aresubmitted may be impressive or grab attention, but it may also be a distraction from the actualcontent or learning objectives. During one session using this form, the first question was abouthow the slides had been made rather
engineering students should provide at least five things to lead to students’further academic success and prepare them for the job market: 1) material mastery, 2)communication, and collaboration, 3) software/programming skills, 4) learning andmetacognition, and 5) confidence. Students in traditional lecture-based classrooms may not betaught these skills [1][2]. Numerous studies have shown that active and cooperative learningclasses are better at addressing these than traditional lecture-based classes [3]. Some examples ofActive learning (AL) and Cooperative learning (CL) [4] are 1) Flipped classroom, 2) Studentpresentation, 3) Student projects, 4) Student discussion, and 5) Student group work.A traditional calculus class is often content-driven and
produced include a concept map. Students leave the course with a clear listof which topics they mastered and which they are still working on. This model still permits roomfor traditional laboratory and project components.IntroductionIn standard teaching, course topics are covered on a set schedule and exams occur at set schedules.If students have not learned the material for an earlier portion of the class, the course moves alonganyway and focuses on new more difficult material that builds on the previous material thatstudent still does not understand. This promotes a fixed mindset promoting the idea that if youdidn’t get a concept, you never will. At the end of the course, students may only have a partialunderstanding of the material and may be
eprotocol utilized in this publication Ide f Determine scope of project and focus Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for search[7]. As shown in Figure 1, the Re ea ch Q e Determine relevant sources ofproposed protocol includes five ScR Ide f literature References for Study
interaction with the students. These industry sessions, therefore,provided a general, real-world contrast while students were also doing a deep dive into one specificarea to complete a laboratory research project in six weeks.A third reason, as we discussed in a previous paper [1], is consistent with some general designelements known to inspire and increase inclusion. For example, an Industry Energy Program willhelp deepen the REM student’s understanding between theory, research, and application; of howwhat they learn in class relates to what companies may be doing. For students with morecommunity-minded orientations (i.e., altruistic cultural values), this bigger picture of what ishappening in the different energy sectors, and learning about real
sustainability offers the only viable path to human safety, equity, health, andprogress” [21, p. 6]. There are strong synergies between ideas of generational equity andsustainable development, for example [22], [23]. Within civil engineering, the infrastructuresustainability rating system Envision [24] is commonly used. Envision has been integrated intoengineering education as a method to educate students about sustainability [25], [26], [27]. DEIissues are included within the Envision credits including the following examples: • QL1.2 Enhance Public Health and Safety [24, p. 32] • “Measures taken to increase safety and provide health benefits on the project site, surrounding sites, and the broader community in a just and equitable