setting [16], [17], [18], [19]. Drawing studentsfrom majors across the university’s colleges, the program emphasizes the value of diverseperspectives, promoting rich interdisciplinary collaboration. Students are offered a mix ofindividual research opportunities, team-driven design projects, technical training related to theseprojects, and various activities that promote community engagement and all-arounddevelopment. The program prides itself on its holistic approach to learning, preparing studentsnot only for the laboratory but for a balanced life and career after graduation. Fairness anddiversity are thus necessary guiding values for the program to cultivate a culture of collaborativeinnovation and personal and professional growth. This
. The student-teachers willadapt lesson plans for all three levels of public school: Elementary, Middle, and High School.The purpose of this first of three phases of the study is to gauge the impacts on undergraduateSTEM student-teacher-researchers of a series of four-hour Saturday-based sessions occurringover the course of Fall Semester 2013. Participants in this first phase of the internally-fundedundergraduate research project will be assessed for their gains in the areas of K-12 STEMteaching, learning, and educational scholarship, as well as student-teacher mastery of relevanttechnical content necessary for successful micro-controller design, build, application, andinstruction to others.Embedded technology micro-controller programming topic
research focuses on exploring and understanding engineering learning environments. He harnesses these insights to propose solutions that encourage the creation of safe and inclusive educational environments conducive to learning, professional development, and innovation. His research interests include graduate student mentorship, faculty development, mental health and well-being, teamwork and group dynamics, and the design of project-based learning classes. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 An exploration of how faculty advising influences doctoral student psychological safety and the impact on work-related outcomes AbstractFaculty advisors perform a vital role in doctoral
American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Teaching the teachers: Expanding impact of technical education through Secondary SchoolsAbstractSecondary schools are in a prime position to introduce students into careers in Supply ChainManagement and Logistics. However, these teachers often lack any practical experience in thefield and lack the understanding to communicate the latest trends, technologies, and careeropportunities to their students. The teachers also lack understanding in how to connect thesehigh-demand careers to their current course offerings in technology or business management.The NSF Award “Technology-Based Logistics: Leveraging Indiana’s Role as the Crossroads ofAmerica” (Awards 1304619
William Palm is Assistant Professor of Engineering at Roger Williams University, where he teaches Engi- neering Graphics and Design, Computer Applications for Engineering, Machine Design, Manufacturing and Assembly, Biomechanics, and Capstone Design. He previously worked as a product design engineer and consultant and taught at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy and Boston University. He holds a PhD in Mechanical Engineering from MIT and is licensed as a Professional Engineer in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Can a Five Minute, Three Question Survey Foretell First-Year Engineering Student Performance and Retention?AbstractThis
, some scholarly journal literature,and technical information. It should be noted that while the course enrollment consisted ofundergraduates, individual skill sets and experiences were varied, and that had an impact on theircomfort with information engagement and use. For example, two students in the class were in theprocess of applying to graduate school, and therefore, had more experience with scholarlyjournal literature.As stated above, there were several business research needs addressed in the course, however, wewill only detail one aspect here, which was to help the students identify and define a targetconsumer. It was important for them to do this because they needed to ensure their design wassomething people would eventually buy
skills. Her current research focuses on identifying impacts of differ- ent factors on ideation of designers and engineers, developing instructional materials for design ideation, and foundations of innovation. She often conducts workshops on design thinking to a diverse range of groups including student and professional engineers and faculty member from different universities. She received her PhD degree in Design Science in 2010 from University of Michigan. She is also a faculty in Human Computer Interaction Graduate Program and the ISU Site Director for Center for e-Design. Page 26.734.1
training. She is currently a Data Science Research Associate at the Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence & Educational Innovation at Carnegie Mellon University. She uses her training and years of experience as a faculty member to support graduate students, faculty, and programs on educational research projects and making data-driven improvements to courses. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Harnessing the Power of Generative AI: A Case Study on Teaching Data Science to Environmental Engineering Students1 IntroductionData science has played a transformative role across research, industry, and education in the 21stcentury
received her B.S. and M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the Ohio State University in 2017, and her M.S. in Engineering Education Research from the University of Michigan in 2020. As a doctoral candidate in Engineering Education Research at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Sarah is studying the mental health experiences of engineering graduate students.Dr. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan Aaron W. Johnson (he/him/his) is an Assistant Professor in the Aerospace Engineering Department and a Core Faculty member of the Engineering Education Research Program at the University of Michigan. He believes in a strong connection between engineering education research and practice, and his research
independently by the timethey graduate. Research in engineering education has demonstrated both the importance ofwriting in the engineering workplace and the extent to which new graduates struggle with thegeneric and rhetorical features of workplace writing [1], [2], [3]. The ME department establisheda committee of four engineers and one writing instructor to determine how better to preparestudents for writing in the curriculum and in their careers.As documented in a previous study, the committee first identified all of the courses in the MEcurriculum that included technical communication instruction. We then categorized thatinstruction by genre, including memos, presentations, reports, and technical drawings. Usingmemos as a starting point, we then
collection of additional information,consideration of external constraints, and thoughtful reflection on the solution process. Theseskills are recognized as crucial for future engineers in their daily professional lives. However,there are concerns from employers and researchers that undergraduate students may not beadequately prepared to address such problems upon graduation [1‒3]. To make things worse,courses in thermofluids require a robust understanding of mathematics and extensively utilizephysics to explain physical systems. Heat transfer, in particular, introduces complex subjects thatmay appear even more difficult for students studying engineering technology.There have been some attempts at addressing the students’ problem-solving abilities
area of hospital patient health monitoring and K-12 education. He is actively engaged in K-12 outreach and interested in collaborative research across colleges. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Getting Engineering Majors to Work with Students in Other Disciplines on Issues Impacting SocietyAbstractDespite all of the physics problems engineering majors learn to solve assuming ideal conditions,engineering problems rarely exist in a vacuum. Engineers are impacted in their work by laws,regulations, and policy, standards, business practices, and communication. This paper showcasesa research-based course for
Session 1630` Dilemmas in Framing Research Studies in Engineering Education David F Radcliffe, Lesley Jolly Catalyst Centre, School of Engineering, University of Queensland, AustraliaAbstractThere has been considerable debate about the need for more empirical, evidence based studies ofthe impact of various interventions and practices in engineering education. A number ofresources including workshops to guide engineering faculty in the conduct of such studies haveemerged over recent years. This paper presents a critique of the evolution of engineeringeducation research and its underlying assumptions in
Paper ID #32198Exploring the Gendered Impacts of COVID-19 on FacultySarah Trainer, Seattle University Sarah Trainer is a medical anthropologist. Her work examines everyday negotiations around identity, wellness, and challenges to these within the context of large organizations. She is currently the Research & Program Coordinator for a National Science Foundation–funded ADVANCE Program at Seattle Uni- versity.Dr. Agnieszka Miguel, Seattle University Agnieszka Miguel received her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering in 2001 from the University of Washing- ton, and MSEE and BSEE from Florida Atlantic University in 1996 and
similar engineeringservice courses.” This question led us to benchmark other institutions. This benchmarkingprocess and its results are the focus of the remainder of this paper.II. BenchmarkingStrategic PlanningGeorge Keller 6 was the first to call for the use of strategic planning as a common practice incollege and university administration. Since that time, many authors and practitioners haveechoed his call for tying resource allocation more directly both to institutional and programmaticneeds, and to performance 7-11. Many state policy-makers now argue for the use of performancemeasures, in particular student learning outcomes and faculty teaching and research productivity,to judge the quality of academic programs 12.Initially academic
standardization of global engineering education andis a means of quality assurance for engineering programs and their graduates. For developingcountries, this is especially important if they are to play a significant role in the development ofglobal engineers who can be strong contributors to the world economy. The Latin American andCaribbean Consortium of Engineering Institutions (LACCEI), in collaboration with theOrganization of American States (OAS) and Engineering for the Americas (EftA), has developedand presented accreditation workshops at its annual conference for the last five years. Theaccreditation workshops have included efforts from several institutions and sponsors. Theseworkshops provide a framework to help institutions of higher education
7 students gave a "concert" on instruments theyhad designed and built themselves.Project Research Questions.The research questions addressed in this work were the following. How good is the learningeffectiveness of a cross disciplinary math, science and engineering design course with real world Page 15.373.4context of music and musical instruments? How effective was change for student affectiveattributes of tinkering and technical self efficacy and future professional impact and of thecognitive attributes including conceptual change in precalculus and physics of sound, as well aschange in problem solving skills and understanding the
catalyzed by the Covid-19 pandemic, increased researched review of automated assignments and grading have exposedopportunities to accommodate a greater grading load. Faculty can design assignments, andcommercially available software easily allows them to administer not only the assignments butalso allow for unlimited attempts. Affording more attempts has been supported by research inlearning as a mechanism for improved retention of knowledge for students. Without incurring theburden of additional grading, faculty can more positively impact the knowledge transfer. However,the increase in grading capability may be reaching a capacity limit with students. Research focusedon the student perceptions of graded assignments tends to cite concerns of
are several examples in the literature of wind chimes being used in introductory physicscourses. Baxter and Hagenbuch7 provide a brief but complete discussion of using wind chimesin an introductory physics class. They include most of the important background theory. Theirfocus is to understand standing waves in a context other than the simple vibrating string. Harris8describes a simple set of experiments used in a high school physics class where students examinethe best place to hold a simple chime and the relationship between length and frequency. Oliver9provides a set of instructions for making a full octave set of wind chimes from electrical conduit.This paper outlines the use of wind chimes as a design project in an Introduction to
concentrating on Teacher Education and Technology. Mrs. Shields taught an adjunct lecturer in the College of Education’s Teaching, Learning, and Culture department before tran- sitioning to serving as a graduate assistant in the Center for Teaching Excellence, where she helps to develop curriculum.Dr. Debra A. Fowler, Texas A&M University Dr. Debra Fowler serves the Director of the Center for Teaching Excellence at Texas A&M University. Following 16 years working in industry she completed a Ph.D. is in Interdisciplinary Engineering with a specific focus on engineering education from Texas A&M University. Her research areas of focus are faculty perspectives and growth through curriculum design and redesign
component of engineering degree programs acrossaccredited engineering universities [1][2]. While the capstone experience may be different foreach university, all projects serve as an opportunity for students to gain practical experience byapplying the many topics learned throughout their undergraduate education, and thereby preparefor work after graduation. The research and design are completed from September to Februarywith several progress presentations and reports throughout. Oral presentations are delivered inMarch and the end-of-project report and presentations are given during the first week of April toother faculty members, students, and industry professionals. Through the end-of-yearpresentations, students are given the opportunity to
introducing industry mentors to students.Through this proposed intervention, we explore the broad research question: How effective is theproposed approach in impacting professional identity formation and promoting industry-relatedcompetencies? Doing so involves addressing related questions such as: (1) what is theunderstanding of these applications and their impact on students in terms of interest, knowledgeof applications, and professional identity formation? (2) What is the relationship betweenstudents’ identity and course performance and assessments? (3) Is there a significant impact ofthe proposed approach on underrepresented groups especially women?We worked with four industry mentors from various areas of chemical engineering to design up-to
sophisticated tools that engage students in new forms of thinking, supportexperimentation and advocate for a growth mindset that encourages persistence and the seekingof challenges and learning, all of which represent valuable learning opportunities that align withthe learning outcomes aspired to by engineering schools [3].In this paper, we assessed the impact of integrating making activities into two engineering designcourses on one non-cognitive attribute — implicit theories —. The study presented in this paperfocuses on the integration of making activities into two collaborative project-based-learningengineering design courses that offer students an authentic learning environment where theywork with a real-time client to solve an engineering problem
. Undergraduate research is a way of focusing and guiding the undergraduate experience,rather than solely serving as a preparation for graduate school, and is a major opportunity todemonstrate to accreditation agencies and other organizations that students are performing atenhanced levels. [5]Undergraduate research programs are held on numerous colleges and universities nationally. Asubstantial number of universities have begun to realize that undergraduate research is a realasset, thus they are identifying more resources and expanding opportunities to involve morestudents. [6] Consequently, UMES designed the Advanced Curriculum and Technology-BasedInstruction Opportunities Network (ACTION) sponsored by the National Science Foundation tosupport a variety
exposed to in associated core courses. Therefore, the addition of new materials does not create a significant cognitive overload or impediments to learning. • Laboratories offer an excellent place to compare the traditional and modern instrumentation, look at trade-offs and discuss better ways to design sampling campaigns and structural health monitoring programs. Therefore, they provide an ideal platform to discuss the role of modern day sensing and informatics and issues related to the inter-linkages between frequency, accuracy and precision of measurements.Given the growing need for cross-disciplinary engineering training, and ensuring engineering studentshave requisite skillsets necessary for the practice of
allstudents in Higher Education.8 However, the transfer rates to four-year colleges are low (21%)and the academic track to a BS or PhD degree in STEM fields is often not well defined.7-9, 11Therefore, this REU program is designed to provide students in the large community colleges ofthe Texas Gulf Coast region with intensive exposure to STEM research and support for successat the undergraduate and graduate levels.The Nanotechnology Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) with a Focus onCommunity Colleges concentrates exclusively on students at two-year colleges where 100% ofthe participants originate from schools with limited STEM research opportunities. Thesestudents are integrated into a community of scholars and provided a research experience
principal and the assistant principal wereinterviewed separately. Both administrators commented positively on the impact of the programon both teachers and students. They remarked on impacts on classroom practice, student affectand student knowledge gain. They said: “It [VDP] is a good opportunity to use problem-basedlearning in the classroom. It is an excellent way to get the classroom involved instead of justgiving the students notes. It is very hands-on.” And added: “It not only benefits the studentsacademically, but it is fun as well.” On a personal level: “It is a motivation for students. Theytake ownership in the final product. The teachers also take pride in the program.” And finally,they said: “N-STAR [VDP] definitely brought in
considered a major influence, as they inspired their children to achievemore than they had accomplished educationally. Anthony’s parents continually encouraged himto “do the best you can and strive for the highest.” Cianni described her parents as “the biggestinfluence.” Macy’s parents constantly inspired her to “go farther than us.” Clewell3 found thatparents were extremely instrumental in encouraging black graduate students to pursue post-secondary education.Participation in a Research or Internship Program May and Chubin26 assert that participation in research is extremely important inencouraging undergraduate students to pursue graduate degrees in engineering and science. Thisproved to be true for many of the study participants, as it was
Electrical Engineering and his Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science from Florida International University in 1992 and 1989. Dr. Gonzalez research interest includes the intelligent control of large scale autonomous systems, autonomous vehicles, discrete-event modeling and simulation and human signature verification. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Impacts of Active Learning on Learning Disabled StudentsAbstractOne of the most important best practices in education is active learning. Earlier this year, theWhite House Office of Science and Technology Policy issued a national Call to Action aimed atimproving STEM education through the use of active learning. Active learning
on defining the “best” method to instruct students to achieve course objectives andoutcomes. Many institutions require their instructors to provide tangible evidence that showsstudents are achieving these course objectives [1]. Detailed course assessments are becoming more 2019 ASEE Zone 1 Conference, April 11-13, 2019 – Niagara Falls, New Yorkand more common, hoping to illuminate areas for improvement to make courses more effective ateducating students. Scores of educational studies coupled with a plethora of books and papersattempt to identify ideal educational practices which enable students to better retain material taughtin the classroom. Numerous conclusions found in these works further support a range of