Asee peer logo
Displaying results 301 - 330 of 339 in total
Collection
ASEE-NE 2022
Authors
Vacharaporn Paradorn; Sunita Rajni Virk Singh Poma; Nathan Agyeman; Kavitha Chandra, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Susan Thomson Tripathy, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Tiana Robinson, University of Massachusetts Lowell
, "Product Lifecycle Managementin aviation maintenance, repair and overhaul," Computers in Industry, vol. 59, no. 2-3, pp. 296-303, 2008.[l2] T. M. Rupp, "Facilitating Collaborative Business Processes in the Aero Engine Industry - Towards Product Lifecycle Management and Beyond," IEEE International Technology Management Conference (ICE), l-8, 2007[l3] K. Y. H. Lim, P. Zheng and C. Chen, "A state-of-the-art survey of Digital Twin:techniques, engineering product lifecycle management and business innovation perspectives," J Intell Manuf, 3l, (6), l3l3-l337, 20l9.[l4] M. Xiong, H. Wong, Q. Fu, and Y. Xu, "Digital twin-driven aero-engine intelligent predictive maintenance," Int J Adv Manuf Technol, ll4, 375l-376l, 202l
Conference Session
PCEE Technical Session 8: Engineering Design in Elementary School
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ron Skinner, University of California, Santa Barbara; Danielle Harlow
Collection
2004 GSW
Authors
Chau Kim Tran; Amir Karimi
= vdP – sdT (25)The starting point to distinguish the stable and metastable state is to apply phaseequilibrium criterion for pure substances at a given pressure or temperature. The familiarphase transitions—vaporization, melting, and sublimation—have two well-knowncharacteristics. First the temperature and pressure remain constant during the phasechange. Second, an energy interaction such as heat is required for phase transition.Historically this quantity of energy has been called the latent heat, for example, the latentheat of vaporization. When heat is use, the energy equation for a closed, constantpressure, simple compressible system reduces to q p = ∆u + p∆v = ∆h
Conference Session
ERM: Mental Health and Wellness
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Catherine Spence, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Luke Nyberg; Justine Chasmar, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Jodi Nelson, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Marissa Tsugawa, Utah State University - Engineering Education
Engineering Education, 1(1).[44] Liu, Q., Sweeney, J., & Evans, G. (2021, July). Exploring Self-directed Learning Among Engineering Undergraduates in the Extensive Online Instruction Environment During the COVID-19 Pandemic. American Society for Engineering Education Virtual Annual Conference.[45] American Society for Engineering Education. (2020). Engineering and Engineering Technology by the Numbers 2019. Washington, DC.[46] McCallum, F., & Price, D. (2016). Nurturing wellbeing development in education: From little things, big things grow. Routledge.[47] Verdín, D., Godwin, A., Kirn, A., Benson, L., Potvin, G. (2018). Understanding How Engineering Identity and Belongingness Predict Grit for First
Conference Session
ERM: ERM Medley Session!
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Khairiyah Mohd-Yusof, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; Nur Shahira Samsuri; Maizam Alias; Akbariah Ary Mohd Mahdzir, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
Conference Session
ERM: ERM Medley Session!
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Karen Miel, Tufts University; Jessica Swenson, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Aaron Johnson, University of Michigan
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division: Approaches to Ethics Education (Part 1)
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Erin Henslee, Wake Forest University; Adetoun Yeaman, Wake Forest University; Joseph Wiinikka-Lydon, Wake Forest University
Worker. In 2021 ASEE VirtualAnnual Conference Content Access.Hennecke M., Bleidorn, W., Denissen, J., and Wood, D. “A three–part framework for self–regulated personality development across adulthood.” European Journal of Personality, 2014,28(3), pp.289-299.Kim, B., Wen, R., Zhu, Q., Williams, T. and Phillips, E., 2021, March. Robots as moral advisors:the effects of deontological, virtue, and confucian role ethics on encouraging honest behavior. InCompanion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction pp. 10-18.King, P.M. and Kitchener, K.S., 2004. Reflective judgment: Theory and research on thedevelopment of epistemic assumptions through adulthood. Educational psychologist, 39(1), pp.5-18.Koehler, J., Pierrakos, O
Conference Session
Chemical Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Erick Vasquez, University of Dayton; Erick Ramos
Conference Session
WIED: Community
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Canan Bilen-Green, North Dakota State University; Cinzia Cervato, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Adrienne Minerick, Michigan Technological University; Ann Burnett, North Dakota State University; Roger Green, North Dakota State University; Carla Koretsky; David Wahl, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Lori Wingate, Western Michigan University; D. Raj Raman, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Sonia Goltz; Patricia Sotirin
multiple days and recording panels or presentations provides additional flexibility to those who might have teaching or work conflicts and/or personal commitments at an event’s scheduled time, although it precludes participation in Q&A or panel discussions.● Attendance over time at the CIMC sessions has declined, a trend in keeping with reports of increased faculty exhaustion in the face of ongoing pandemic adjustments and increased task demands, especially for faculty mothers [45] as well as Zoom fatigue, which impacts women more than men [46]. A&A sessions had considerably less attendance than pre-pandemic sessions; however, the in-person sessions were better attended than the online sessions
Conference Session
PCEE Session 13: Equity in P-12 Engineering Education
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sarah Lilly, University of Virginia; Anne McAlister, University of Virginia; Jennifer Chiu, University of Virginia
inengineering practices.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant DRL-1742195. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.ReferencesAmerican Society for Engineering Education (2020). Framework for P-12 engineering learning. American Society for Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-100-1153-1Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., Wiliam, D., & Johnson, D. (1997). Effective Teachers of Numeracy in Primary Schools: Teachers' Beliefs, Practices and Pupils' Learning.Capobianco, B., & Lehman, J. D., & Huang, Q., & Nyquist, C. (2016, June
Conference Session
International Division Technical Session 6: Monitoring, Evaluating and Research
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nicholas Dang, Purdue Engineering Education; Kirsten Davis, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Brent Jesiek, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division: Approaches to Ethics Education (Part 2)
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Angela Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder
Conference Session
Intersections of Identity and Student Experiences: Equity, Culture & Social Justice Technical Session 10
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jerry Yang, Stanford University; Crystal Nattoo
Conference Session
LEAD Tech Session #2: Assessing and Evaluating Engineering Leadership Development.
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Elizabeth Volpe; Madeline Polmear, University of Florida; Denise Simmons, University of Florida; Danielle Weisenfeld, University of Florida; Jackson Carcaba, University of Florida
Conference Session
Assessment in Mechanics Courses
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael Sevier, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Vincent Prantil, Milwaukee School of Engineering
time investment when first creating these problems is about one to two hours. Afterthey are created, they can be reused for subsequent classes with usually only minor updates (e.g.,adding clarity to the problem statement). The automated grading does save time but can generatea substantial increase in student questions. The quantity of these questions can be managed bythe following guidelines: • Provide students with a “MATLAB Grader Q & A” worksheet that contains answers to commonly asked questions regarding MATLAB Grader. • Insist that students come prepared with neatly written work describing their process instead of just their code. • Update the feedback within MATLAB Grader tests to reflect common errors or
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division: Computing, Technology, and AI
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Franz Kurfess, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Katya Vasilaky, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Tina Cheuk, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Ryan Jenkins; Grace Nolan; Amir Hajrasouliha; Elise St John
Consumer Protection. https://datenethikkommission.de/wp-content/uploads/DEK_Gutachten_engl_bf_200121.p dfDesai, S. (2021, April). Stanford University CS 21SI: AI for Social Good. https://explorecourses.stanford.edu/search?view=catalog&filter-coursestatus-Active=on& page=0&catalog=&academicYear=20192020&q=CS%2021SI%3A%20AI%20for%20So cial%20Good&collapse=D’Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020). Data Feminism. MIT Press.Ethics & Compliance Initiative (ECI). (2021). The PLUS Ethical Decision Making Model—Ethics & Compliance Toolkit. Ethics and Compliance Initiative. https
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division: Approaches to Ethics Education (Part 1)
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cortney Holles, Colorado School of Mines
Globalized World: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 22, C. Murphy, P. Gardoni, H. Bashir, C. Harris, Jr., and E. Masad, Eds. New York: Springer, 2015, pp. 229-247.[9] Q. Zhu and B. K. Jesiek, “A pragmatic approach to ethical decision-making in engineering practice: Characteristics, evaluation criteria, and implications for instruction and assessment,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 23, no. 3, 2017, pp. 663–679.[10] S. J. Hitt, C. E. P. Holles, and T. Lefton, “Integrating ethics in engineering education through multidisciplinary synthesis, collaboration, and reflective portfolios
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gillian Roehrig, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Ngawang Gonsar; Alison Haugh Nowariak, University of Minnesota
respective fields, but this will all come with time and I am excited to learnmore.” Devin was an exception during week 1, his comments illustrated his feelings assomewhat of an outsider when he stated, “Given that we talked about what my topic may havebeen I felt I could have provided more insight or ideas to what it was, but felt my opinion did notmatter since they were the lab that was accepting me.”Table 3. Results of the Weekly Pulse Survey Name Q Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Christine 1 Somewhat No group Strongly No group Strongly No group Somewhat No group Agree meeting Agree meeting Agree meeting Disagree meeting
Conference Session
Social Identities and STEM Experiences: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 6
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Angela Minichiello, Utah State University
Conference Session
Virtual and Augmented Reality Applications in Manufacturing Education
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Xiangxiong Kong, Coastal Carolina University; Alex Fegely, Coastal Carolina University; Wout De Backer, University of South Carolina; Monica Gray, The University of Texas Permian Basin; George Hitt, Coastal Carolina University; Ryan Kerns
. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1171–1182[40] Le, Q. T., Pedro, A., & Park, C. S. (2015). A social virtual reality based construction safety education system for experiential learning. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 79(3), 487-506.[41] Schwaab, J., Kman, N., Nagel, R., Bahner, D., Martin, D. R., Khandelwal, S., ... & Nelson, R. (2011). Using second life virtual simulation environment for mock oral emergency medicine examination. Academic Emergency Medicine, 18(5), 559-562.[42] Schofield, D. (2014). A Virtual Education: Guidelines for Using Games Technology. Journal of Information Technology Education, 13.[43] Juliani, A., Berges, V. P., Teng, E., Cohen, A., Harper, J., Elion, C., ... & Lange, D
Conference Session
Computers in Education 11 - Modulus 3
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Inesmar Briceno Rivero, Universidad Andres Bello; Maria Elena Truyol, Universidad Andres Bello
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering: Online Education
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Andrea Gregg, Pennsylvania State University; Jacqueline O'Connor, Pennsylvania State University
Conference Session
LEAD Technical Session 1: Fostering Leadership Identity Development and DEI in Engineering Students and Professionals
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Katreena Thomas, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus
Conference Session
Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Amy Walker, University of Texas at Dallas; Laura Gelles, University of Texas at Dallas
disagree and 5=strongly agree. All Has Hispa LGB First- Short Stude F M Asian Black White Disab Q Key nic T+ Gen description nts n=17 n=48 n=39 n=3 n=45 ility n=9 n=22 n=12 n=76 n=14 Weed-out
Conference Session
Pre-College Engineering Education Technical Session 7: Cybersecurity and Computing
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mike Borowczak, University of Wyoming; Andrea Burrows, University of Wyoming; Andey Robins, University of Wyoming
Ac te O In rg n io O st ue Q Figure 4: Number and Quality of Lessons Across Evaluation Areas Average Lesson Evaluation Excellent
Conference Session
PCEE Session 3: Robotics and Design Competitions
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Anurag Purwar, Stony Brook University; Amanjeet Bagga, Stony Brook University; Cynthia Colón, Stony Brook University; Imin Kao, Stony Brook University
Conference Session
International Division Technical Session 5: COVID-19 Pandemic Lessons and Best Practices
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hans Tritico, University of Mount Union; Okechukwu Ugweje, University of Mount Union; Chad Korach, University of Mount Union; Ethan Shirley, University of Michigan
Conference Session
EMD Technical Session 2: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Laramie Potts, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Huiran Jin
Conference Session
Civil Engineering Division - Mechanics Applied and the Best in Five... Get Ready!
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
James Kaklamanos, Merrimack College; Simon Ghanat, The Citadel; Craig Shillaber, Northeastern University; Tanya Kunberger, Florida Gulf Coast University; Brock Barry, United States Military Academy; Shawn Griffiths, University of Wyoming; Corrie Walton-Macaulay, Saint Martin's University; Suresh Immanuel, University of Evansville; David Saftner, University of Minnesota Duluth; Chris Swan, Tufts University
eight years of data, some minor increases and decreases areobserved, but there are no significant trends versus time. 100 Pre Post 80 Mean Score Q 3 (%) 68.9 68.7 65.4 62.3 64 60.3 63.2 60 60 50
Conference Session
LEES 1: Critical Humanities and Serious Play
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Benjamin Laugelli, University of Virginia
and Race” in LEGO® and Philosophy: Constructing Reality Brick by Brick, R. Cook and S. Bacharach, Eds. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2017, pp. 91-101.[17] A. Quanbeck, “Searching for ‘The Special:’ The LEGO® Movie and the Value of (LEGO®) Persons” in LEGO® and Philosophy: Constructing Reality Brick by Brick, R. Cook and S. Bacharach, Eds. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2017, pp. 59- 68.[18] C. Bartneck, Q. Ser, E. Moltchanova, J. Smithies, and E. Harrington, “Have LEGO Products Become More Violent?” PLoS ONE, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1-27, 2016. Accessed: Feb. 12, 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155401. Available: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id