Paper ID #30713The role of prototyping in design and policy making: Visual stimuli,selective attention and decision makingHadi Ali, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Hadi Ali is a doctoral student in Engineering Education Systems and Design at Arizona State University. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020The role of prototyping in design and policy making: Visual stimuli, selective attention and decision making 1. OverviewThis is a theory paper. In this study, we integrate research on visual stimuli
been linked to a range ofpositive academic outcomes. For example, a study of over 1,000 students attending a diverserange of institutions [1] evaluated engagement in terms of the nature and amount of academicwork a student performed, the frequency of student participation in class, and the degree ofparticipation in other educationally fruitful activities. Bivariate correlations between theseengagement measures and GPA were significant for all three forms of engagement (p < 0.01) andbivariate correlations between RAND test scores (representing critical thinking and studentlearning) and student engagement were significant for two of the three forms of engagement(academic work and participation in other educationally fruitful activities). The
graduate teaching duties while alsogenerating grant funding, producing publications, and serving in numerous mentorship roles [1],[2]. Moreover, the number of students in the classroom has increased while departmental fundinghas decreased, resulting in fewer resources and smaller increases in compensation for faculty.Taken together, these conditions are likely to impact the teaching satisfaction of ECE faculty.Although teaching satisfaction of ECE faculty specifically has not been studied, other researchhas shown that faculty well-being, which includes teaching satisfaction, has been linked tofaculty retention and turnover intentions [3] as well as faculty performance of job responsibilities[4]. Moreover, a qualitative study in which engineering
, learning environment, andacademic concern. The TA section includes an overall rating for the teaching assistant (TA). Atthe end of each section, a “Comments/Suggestions” box is included, where the students areencouraged to write their comments. These surveys are administered typically at 1/3 (Week 5)and 2/3 (Week 10) of the semester.Based on the findings of each survey, the instructor makes a brief presentation during class,where the most frequent comments/issues are discussed along with actions to address them. Thethird survey further serves as a measure of the efficiency of the adopted actions from the secondsurvey. The fourth survey is administered by the university typically during Week 14 of thesemester and serves as a final assessment
described in the four-page article [1] authored by Allyn Jackson of the AMS. 1In this paper we describe some of these changes, the implementation of which was especiallyhelped by three externally supported programs providing student scholarships and mentoring.One of these programs has been the S-STEM program supported by the NSF DUE (Division ofUndergraduate Education at the National Science Foundation). Our S-STEM program [2] hasbeen running since 2008, and it has helped us to make systematic improvements at theundergraduate level. The second program is the Bridge-to-Doctorate Program [3] supported bythe NSF-DMS Infrastructure Program (Division of Mathematical Sciences at the NSF). This issimilar to
technical manual, a single battery last 2 hours. Italso features a $40 school discount. See Figure 1 and Table 1.Fig. 1. Battery discharge diagram for the first battery chosen along with table below. Table 1. Data observed for the first battery The battery we used was the Odyssey 34R-790. It was a large battery than the PC950 and wascheaper by $150 A single battery could meet out design requirements at full charge. This wouldhelp as the environment to demonstration would be indoors which is not ideal and our batterymay not be fully charged. See Figure 2 and Table 2. Fig. 2. Battery discharge diagram for the final battery chosen along with table below Table 2. Data observed for the final batteryC. Solar
grade. However, homework also represents a primary way that student’slearn new material. Additionally, homework that achieves elements of metacognition has beenproven to increase learning[1].This is a study of a method that enforces self-evaluated and revised student homework that wasused at the United States Military Academy (USMA) over the course of four years in upper levelmechanical engineering classes. Students completed a homework assignment by the due date.They then scanned and digitally submitted their work to the instructor (via email or an onlinesubmission portal through a Learning Management System). This established a record of whatthey accomplished on their own. After the initial due date had passed, the instructor published
will address the sequential nature of the cognitive processes revealed in students’utterances as they solved engineering design problems and identify the role that metacognitionplays in that sequencing. We hypothesized that as students acquired greater engineeringknowledge and were exposed to greater use of metacognitive thinking and strategies that focusedon that knowledge across their education at IRE, the sequencing of their utterances wouldindicate the following differences from the pre to the post problem: (1) greater sustained use of engineering knowledge when solving the post problem; (2) increased metacognitive monitoring occurring before and after the use of engineering knowledge on the post problem; (3
by required coursework in both engineering and thetraditional liberal arts, this core course sequence in Engineering Studies gives students aninterdisciplinary mindset and identity as “sociotechnical engineers.”In this paper, we describe the development, evolution, and assessment of our core three-coursesequence in Engineering Studies. Degree programs like Lafayette’s AB in Engineering Studiesprovide a mechanism for achieving the interdisciplinary, sociotechnical goals articulated by theNAE [1] and others, and for broadening participation in engineering education [2-3, e.g.]. As inour previous paper on the history of this program [4], we will consider both the transferability ofour approach to other institutional contexts and its
Policy,Zhejiang University School of Public Affairs,Zhejiang UniversityDr. Yujie Wang, Zhejiang University Wang Yu-jiePostgraduate of Institute of China’s Science,Technology and Education Policy, Zhejiang Uni- versity School of Public AffairsZhejiang University.Dr. chen li, Zhejiang University 1 American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020The Status of University-Industry Collaboration in China, EU and USA ——A Comparative Research on Co-authored PublicationsAbstractThe type of this paper is research. Policymakers and industry strategists in developing countriesare increasingly considering initiatives that foster university-industry
Initiative (B&R) being conducted byChina and participating countries and regions. This is evidenced by the fact that 138 countriesand 30 international organizations have so far signed cooperation agreements with China onjointly building the Belt and Road, according to data published in January 2020 on China'sofficial Belt and Road web portal, including 27 European countries, like Italy, Greece, Russia,Luxembourg, 37 Asian countries, like Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, Pakistan, uzbekistan, 44African countries, 11 Oceanian countries, 8 South American countries and 11 NorthAmerican Countries. [1] The B&R prioritizes the interconnection of infrastructure includinghighways, railways, ports, and pipelines of oil and gas. The enthusiasm for
and act globally’. The transitionfrom STEM to STEAM can have that global impact by leveraging the arts as a way to communicate andconnect globally.Key words: Art, aesthetics, design in engineering, expressive and sensory qualities, form.IntroductionAesthetics as a subject of formal study in higher education was first emphasized by John Dewey for theUS schools. Dewey referred to art as an experience between the artist, the work of art and its observer[1]. Each time an observer looks at Leonardo da Vinci’s Mona Lisa, a new Mona Lisa is born. Art is acontinuum from the germination of an idea to the culmination of a complex creation in its supremeform. Aesthetics is a common thread in this process which is essentially a process of the
technology through the dedicated undergraduate (MET 4173) class as well as through the hands-on training sessions and certification (level 1 to 4) in the Endeavor Digital Manufacturing Maker Space.Dr. Charles Ira Abramson, Oklahoma State University Department of Psychology Dr. Charles I. Abramson is Regents Professor of Psychology at Oklahoma State University and founder of the Laboratory of Comparative Psychology and Behavioral Biology. He earned his PhD. in Psychology from Boston University in 1986. He joined the faculty of Oklahoma State University in 1993 and holds adjunct appointments in the Departments of Integrative Biology and Entomology and Plant Pathology. Trained as a comparative-physiological psychologist, he
ExperienceIntroductionLaboratory notebooks serve numerous purposes and have been used to document activities,results, success, and revisions [1]. Laboratory notebooks also serve as a means of organizingideas and serve as a record of legal ownership of ideas [2]. Beyond this, though, notebooksprovide valuable information that can be analyzed to answer an array of questions [3]. Forinstance, laboratory notebooks served as means of understanding how researchers catalogactivities [4]. Researchers have also addressed the ways in which lab notebooks are used todocument research activities and the degree to which notebooks should be considered vitalrecords [5]. Still others have investigated how implementing electronic notebooks influenceslaboratory activity [7]. In the
learning and development [1]. Broadly, studies of student engagement have oftenexamined relationships between a student’s educational experiences and the outcomes of interest,finding that, in general, higher engagement was linked to gains in outcomes such as learning andpersistence [2], [3]. In particular, engagement in co-curricular settings, or experiences outside theclassroom, has been linked to the development of several technical and professional outcomesfor engineering students such as leadership, ethical decision making, teamwork, andcommunication [4]–[9]. Beyond those outcomes, co-curricular engagement has also been linkedto outcomes such as self-efficacy and a sense of belonging, which can improve retention andpersistence in engineering
Macaulay Mr American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 The Way Things Work: Sketching and Building to Improve Visual Communication and Spatial Reasoning SkillsIntroductionThe Ways Things Work, a course offered by the Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouthbased on the book by the same title, focuses on helping students understand engineered systemsby sketching and building. The course is co-taught by Vicki May, a professor of engineering, andDavid Macaulay, illustrator of the The Way Things Work [1],[2] and carries art credit (allDartmouth students must take at least one art course). The goal
Academy of Education / Spencer Postdoctoral Fellow and a 2018 NSF CAREER awardee in engineering education research. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two-strand research program fo- cused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn.Luke Kachelmeier, University of New Mexico Luke Kachelmeier finished his bachelor’s degree from the University of New Mexico in May 2019. He completed a double major degree in applied math and psychology. His interests are in human factors
education in STEM programs. Thispaper covers some of the key areas of the Institute’s activities including recruitment of students,daily management of the participants and tracking the status of Alumni of the Institute.Key words: Summer Transportation Institute, Careers in Transportations, Field Trips, MiddleSchool Students, STEM ProgramsIntroductionA 2018 US Bureau of Labor Statistics1 show that the percentage of African Americans employedin the Transportation and Utilities industries is 19.2% as compared with whites which total 71.7%.The dismal numbers are also the same in all areas of transportation, for all minorities includingAsians and Hispanics as shown in Table 1. One component of the application material that theUMES STI required was a
Illustrator, Microsoft Word, Excel, Origin American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #31061AWARDS • Chancellor’s Award at University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee • Texas A&M University Engi-neering Scholarship • Dean’s Honor List at Korea UniversityACTIVITIES/COMMUNITY SERVICE • Volunteer Judge at Texas Science and Engineering Fair • Trea-surer of International Christian Fellowship at Texas A&M University • Volunteer Teacher at Vision Ko-rean School in College station, TX • Volunteer Teacher at Saenal Night School in SeoulPUBLICATIONS 1. H. Kim, X. Huang, I. Guo, S. Cui, Z
categories depends on the type of institution andwhether the faculty member is tenured/tenure-track (Table 1). While these categories arecommonplace, the compartmentalization of the categories will allow this framework to beapplied to tenure and nontenure-track faculty.Table 1. Type of Faculty Member and Emphasis on Career Development Categories Type of faculty member/Categories emphasized Teaching Scholarship Service Tenure track X X X Nontenure track: teaching-focused X X Nontenure track: research-focused X XInstitutions Involved in this EffortThree
engineering. Dr. Wood aims to recover the benefits of classical-model, literature-based learning in civil engineering education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Three Model Framework for Engineering Problem SolvingAbstractA three-model framework provides a foundation and context for developing engineering analysisskills. The three models are 1) reality, 2) mental models, and 3) engineering and math models. Adiagram of these models supports the engineering problem solving format (Given, Find,Procedure, Solution, Answer) and illustrates the interaction between engineering application(reality), engineering judgement (mental model), and scientific theory
domains.IntroductionConcept maps, as facilitative tools for learning, was developed by Novak and others in the late1970s [1]. The idea was to represent ‘knowledge domains’ in a visual, logical sequence with anemphasis on the relationship between the various elements or ‘concepts.’ At the very least,concept maps help to organize the contents of a knowledge domain. At its best use, concept mapshelp students recollect prior knowledge, link the various courses in liberal arts, science and math,engineering, and economics and summarize their learning. A list-based syllabus does not connectthe previous knowledge to the one pursued in the current course. The syllabus also does notenlighten the student about the holistic nature of transdisciplinary education in the
1 To Be, or Not to Be, a Professor: Views of Engineering Postdoctoral ScholarsAbstractThrough an embedded, multiple-case study design, this interpretivist research paper explores theways in which 22 engineering postdoctoral scholars describe the appeal of pursuing a career inthe professoriate. Interviews, grounded by social cognitive career theory (SCCT) (Lent et al.,1994), offered an in-depth understanding of the nature, meaning, and ways in which theirpostdoctoral scholars’ learning experiences influence their view of the professoriate and,consequently, their career decision-making process. Data analysis strategies established bySilverman (1993) and Stake (1995) were utilized to examine the
thespecific activities in the context of innovation and entrepreneurship competitions that may berelevant when exploring students’ entrepreneurial intention. Next, the report proposeshypotheses of possible pathways of how the constructs of PBT may have an impact onengineering students’ entrepreneurial intention for later verification.IntroductionInnovation and entrepreneurship, as major driver and new engine for economic developmentand growth, have been regarded as critical by counties around the world to facilitate nationaleconomic transformation and upgrading as well as international competitiveness [1].Accordingly, world-class universities devote to cultivating innovative and entrepreneurialtalents and current innovation and entrepreneurship
. The students werealso administered the Godwin Engineering Identity (GEI) survey. Data analysis indicated thatstudents’ tolerance of ambiguity increased on only few items of the RRAT instrument with thetime spent in college. The analysis of the engineering identity indicated positive changes onseveral of the items of the instrument for the freshmen while reduction on some items of the GEIsurvey were observed. This research is supported by NSF Grant# 1832041..IntroductionIt is expected that by 2025 the US will require an additional 3.5 million science, technology,engineering and mathematics (STEM) qualified persons to fill the growing need [1]. However, thechallenge being faced is the retention and subsequent graduation of students in STEM
James Christopher Foreman1 1 Department of Engineering Fundamentals Aly A. Farag2 , Asem Ali2 , Islam Alkabbany2 2 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Marci S. DeCaro3 3 Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences Thomas R. Tretter4 4 Department of Elementary, Middle & Secondary Teacher Education University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292 April 29, 2020AbstractThis paper is a work in progress, supported by NSF funds, applied to first-year engineeringmathematics courses. An approach to
University since completion of the program. Weanalyzed the transcripts from the interview using an inductive approach to coding the data touncover themes. Results suggest that the Summer Scholars program impacts areas ofundergraduate engineering students’ university experience in the intended ways.Introduction Many colleges in the United States offer summer bridge programs to their students toincrease retention and preparedness to promote student success [1]. Since 2012, the College ofEngineering has conducted a first-year summer bridge program for 30-60 entering engineeringstudents to get a head start on their transition from high school to university. The program,entitled Summer Scholars, is a residential program where students take any in
and promulgates three sets of criteria for accrediting engineeringprograms [1]: I. General Criteria for Baccalaureate Level Programs II. General Criteria for Master’s Level Programs III. Program CriteriaThe General Criteria for Baccalaureate Level Programs, which are applicable to undergraduateengineering programs in all disciplines, are organized into the following eight criteria [1]: • Criterion 1 – Students • Criterion 2 – Program Educational Objectives • Criterion 3 – Student Outcomes • Criterion 4 – Continuous Improvement • Criterion 5 – Curriculum • Criterion 6 – Faculty • Criterion 7 – Facilities • Criterion 8 – Institutional SupportABET has classified Criteria 1, 2, 4, 7, and 8 as harmonized criteria—meaning that
lead to varying career outcomes. BWEF are lesslikely than men to be employed in tenure-track positions [2], earn tenure [2,3], or become a fullprofessor [2,3]; and the findings of a recent study report perceptions of disparities in salary andawards [2]. On the other hand, the receipt of a promotion, tenure, and professional autonomy arethings that have been found to contribute to the retention of BWEF [2]. Existing literature identifies four types of factors that significantly influence their experiencesand career outcomes: (1) the impact of mentoring; (2) aspects of a chilly organizational climate andacts of incivility; (3) clarifying role expectations; and (4) personal attributes. (See “ConstructsOverview” for additional information
a continued attempt to construct and maintain a shared conception of aproblem [1, p.70]”. The role of the teacher in implementing collaborative problem solvingactivities in face-to-face STEM classrooms has received increasing attention in recent years [2],[3], [4], [5]. According to these researchers, teachers must implement strategies that can facilitatestudent interactions in groups which, in turn, can positively impact the group progress towardsthe goal of solving the task during the activity. These strategies must take place prior to thebeginning of the activity, during the activity, and at the end of the activity [3]. Empirical studiesthat focus on examining these strategies are limited [6], [7], [8], [9]; they all recommend