Ohio State University in 1994 and 1997, respectively. He teaches both undergraduate and graduate courses related to mechanisms and machine dynamics, integrated product development, solid mechanics and plasticity theory, structural design and analysis, engineering analysis and finite element methods and has interests in remote laboratories, project-based learning and student learning assessment. His research is in the areas of remote sensing and control with applications to remote experimentation as well as modeling of microstructure changes in metal forming processes. He publishes regularly in peer-reviewed conference proceedings and scientific journals. At the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition in Chicago
Paper ID #32365Impact of Online Worksheets Versus In-class Printed Worksheets onStudents’ Learning Outcomes and Content MasteryDr. Paniz Khanmohammadi Hazaveh, Michigan Technological University Dr. Hazaveh received her PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the Michigan Technological University in 2018 with a focus on Single Electron Transistors.She has been a Lecturer in Electrical Engineering and Electrical Engineering Technology at MTU since 2017 where she is currently a Lecturer in the College of Computing.Dr. Linda Wanless, Michigan Technological University Dr. Linda Wanless has 16+ years teaching Engineering
(7) areunique to the new BME program and are specifically designed to address the ABET BME programcriteria.A diverse group of direct assessment tools are utilized for course assessment. Examples of thesetools include exam problems, homework problems, lab report sections, and design report sections.In addition, assessment using surveys is used as an indirect tool of the SO’s.Teaching laboratories, course projects and clinical exposure:BME students have access to three BME teaching laboratories; two new laboratories; (1)Biomaterials & Tissue Engineering Lab and (2) Medical Instrumentation and Imaging Lab, andone lab that existed prior to the establishment of the program; the Human Motion Analysis Lab.All BME courses have a project
North Midwest Section Conference programs have reduced their hands-on experiences, laboratories, and design options simply to save resources. 5. Less technical content and more professional skills Many BSME program faculties lack the talent or resources to teach topics outside of the core of mechanical engineering, like multi-disciplinary approaches to problem solving, innovation, communication skills, and professional skills. Removing technical content may also threaten program accreditation.The implementation challenges facing the recommendations for graduate programs are discussedbelow. 1. A stand-alone professional masters degree focused on providing more technical depth for practicing
Paper ID #34559Computer Science and Computational Thinking Across the Early Elemen-taryCurriculum (Work in Progress)Dr. Kenneth Berry, Southern Methodist University Dr. Kenneth Berry is the Associate STEM Director at the Caruth Institute in the Lyle School of Engi- neering at Southern Methodist University (SMU). He has worked as an education specialist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory until he received his doctorate in Educational Technology in 2001. He then taught at the Michael D. Eisner School of Education at California State University at Northridge (CSUN). In 2009, he moved to Texas to work at the Science and
Paper ID #32668Quality Improvement Using a Stage Gate Approach in EngineeringProgrammes and CoursesDr. Calvin Sophistus King, MCET Heads Outcome Based Education division of the college. Is responsible for implementation and review of outcome based approach in programmes offered. Teaches engineering at the first degree level.Dr. Venugopalan Kovaichelvan, TVS Institute for Quality and Leadership Dr. V. KOVAICHELVAN is the Director of TVS Institute for Quality and Leadership, the Corporate University of TVS Motor Company Limited, India. The Institute focus on holistic development of talent through career lifecycle with focus
Paper ID #33304Building and Revising an Assessment to Measure Students’ Self-Efficacyin Systems ThinkingDr. Marsha Lovett, Carnegie Mellon University Dr. Marsha Lovett is Associate Vice Provost of Teaching Innovation, Director of the Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence and Educational Innovation, and Teaching Professor of Psychology – all at Carnegie Mellon University. She applies theoretical and empirical principles from learning science research to improve teaching and learning. She has published more than fifty articles in this area, co-authored the book How Learning Works: 7 Research-Based Principles for Smart
of some ra- dionuclides of environmental interests with different types of soils and rocks. Research interests included Low- and high-level radioactive waste disposal, conditioning of radioactive waste, radiation protection, and subsurface contaminant transport. Other research program includes hazardous and mixed waste; per- formance assessment of the high-level radioactive waste repositories; colloidal transport of contaminants and; disposal of Greater-than-Class C radioactive waste. His research area of Contaminant Transport encompassed the physics and chemistry of the fate and transport of contaminants in aquifers. He has ac- cumulated laboratory experience in purchasing, installing, and operating analytical
curriculum developer,with several challenges. These challenges include defining the applied cryptographycourse with respect to course goals, scope, content, and organization. While there arewell-established cryptography courses offered in the Computer Science and Mathematicsdisciplines, these classes tend to focus on mathematical foundations rather than servicesand applications. Consequently, the developer of such courses finds that resourcesparticularly those relating to “hands-on” activities are lacking.For a lab module designer, creating modules that support an applied cryptography classpresents several unique challenges. For example, the choice of laboratory softwarepresents a unique challenge. This is especially true since most commercial
environmental faculty in the CEES at OU includes both environmental engineers andenvironmental scientists. CEES benefits from the synergy of engineers working with non-engineers in both the research and teaching missions of the school. In the early 1990’s, CEES © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Midwest Section Conferencedecided to coordinate “capstone courses” (a.k.a., senior design) with practicing professionalsoutside of the university. The use of real world, multidisciplinary, practitioner directed capstoneprojects provided many benefits over the traditional single student “senior design” papers([1],[2]). In the mid 2000’s, CEES made the decision to implement a two
of the instructor was shared withthe distance learning students and at the same time, was projected to the classroom monitors forthe in-person students. The virtual room audio was connected to the classroom audio system sothat the distance learning students could hear their in-person peers speak during the class andvice versa. In addition to the classroom audio-visual technology, the real-time chat functionalityof the virtual room was used to interact with the distance learning students in a more efficientway. An experienced graduate teaching assistant (GTA) moderated the chat throughout the classand answered most of the questions from the distance learning students. If any question or issueraised in the chatbox needed the instructor’s
andPublishing, 2002.(3) PERRY ET AL., Perry s Chemical Engineers Handbook, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 7th ed., 1997;Sections 19 & 20.(4) ASTM, D422-63 Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils [Reapproved 1998].Biographical InformationKEITH B LODGEAssociate ProfessorChemical Engineering, University of Minnesota DuluthKeith Lodge has developed two laboratory-based courses, one in process control and the other in particletechnology. He also teaches heat and mass transfer in which he brings a hands-on approach to the class. His generalresearch interests include Thermodynamics, Physical Chemistry & Particle Technology in Chemical Engineering,Environmental Engineering & Science, and Partition Coefficients & Activity
Dr. Jonathan Hubler is an assistant professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineer- ing at Villanova University, with expertise in geotechnical engineering. His research interests include geotechnical earthquake engineering, static and dynamic response of soils in the laboratory and field, soil liquefaction, and beneficial reuse of recycled materials in geotechnical engineering. Dr. Hubler teaches a number of undergraduate and graduate courses, including Soil Mechanics, Foundation Design, and Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering.Dr. Kristin M. Sample-Lord P.E., Villanova University Dr. Kristin Sample-Lord is an assistant professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engi- neering at
engineeringproblems.During the fall 2020 semester, the course was offered as a blended course to facilitate pandemic-related flexibility. The on-campus face-to-face lectures were offered in-person andsynchronously through the Blackboard Collaborate platform and recorded for later access. Allthe laboratory exercises were prerecorded by the teaching faculty and posted online prior to theface-to-face labs’ meeting time. The students had the option of attending the activity on campusor watch it performed by the teaching faculty.The ParticipantsThe MET program, the largest of the five programs in our Engineering Technology Department,enrolls approximately 380 students. The fall 2020 MET 4100 cohort comprised of 37 seniors.The students were divided in groups of up to
objective of the educators to keep the courses accessible to engineeringmajors of any stripe (e.g. electrical, mechanical, biomedical, general, etc.) possessing theappropriate prerequisites. Energy is, at its best, a naturally interdisciplinary subject, though thereare pedagogical challenges inherent with teaching to such a broad audience. Another challenge isthe introduction of appropriate computational tools in the courses, which is the subject of thispaper. TRNSYS in Solar EnergyTRNSYS (“Transient System Simulator,” pronounced “tran-sis”) was originally developed at theUniversity of Wisconsin in the 1970s for numerical analysis of solar hot water heating systems.The UW Solar Energy Laboratory continues its
as motors.Traditionally, the instructor would go to each workbench to check and help the students in groups.However, COVID-19 has disrupted face-to-face laboratory teaching. During the pandemic, theengineering technology education model has been shifted by forcing in-classroom classes to gointo distance online learning mode [5,6,7]. It is very challenging for students to work on a hands-on embedded project and understand how instruments to be used to measure and test withoutseeing these devices and electronics components in person. Without the real physical equipment,it is difficult for instructors to show demos and teach as well. So, the project guidance must beredesigned, and the assessment must be updated accordingly to measure the
understanding of how these newer materials are affected by long-term use and exposure toadverse conditions. This not only increases general confidence in the ability of the devices to beimplemented into hazardous systems, but also allows for failure analysis to be iterated on infuture designs. Educating students on the importance of reliability testing can be difficult due to thetypical ways students are exposed to devices and systems in classrooms and laboratories.Students, especially at the undergraduate level, are often exposed to devices/systems just afterlearning about them. Laboratory exercises are often geared towards normal system performanceand rarely contain fault analysis. When fault analysis is examined in a classroom environment
of belonging to their program of study. While this was a known problem for theEE program, a closed-loop educational assessment and improvement was conducted to close thegap and relate students to their field of study as early as the first semester of study. In this newapproach to the lower-division courses students will start system view courses and currentprototyping circuits and tools were used to set up the laboratory experiments. The goals of thisstudy were: a) Integration of courses and providing a system view in the lower-division courses. b) Improving retention and engagement in early years of study. c) Closing the gap between lower-division and upper-division courses by practicing system view projects using
arts organizations.Dr. Nassif E. Rayess, University of Detroit Mercy Nassif Rayess is Professor and Chair of Mechanical Engineering at University of Detroit Mercy. He was part of the efforts to introduce entrepreneurially minded learning to the University as part of the KEEN Network and Engineering Unleashed. He is also directly involved in the curricular elements of the co- op program at the University, and teaches the professional development courses that bookends the co-op semesters. He received his Ph.D. from Wayne State University and joined Detroit Mercy in 2001. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Embedding Technical Writing into a
Paper ID #35028Undergraduate Area of Emphasis in Unmanned Aerial SystemsDr. Mario G Perhinschi, West Virginia University Mario G. Perhinschi is a Professor with the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at West Virginia University. He is teaching courses in Feedback Control, Flight Simulation, Mechatron- ics, Aircraft Health Management, and Artificial Intelligence Techniques. He is actively involved in the improvement of the Aerospace Engineering Curriculum at his institution. His current research interests include primarily the design of intelligent fault tolerant control laws, trajectory planning and tracking
training programs), Ross Kastor was hired as a lecturer to teach the class.While he has added and subtracted lecture topics, the project aspect of the course hadremained relatively unchanged since 1981. Fours years ago the Department of Electricaland Computer Engineering (ECE) added the course as a degree requirement for all Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of Texas at Arlington Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationstudents entering in the fall, 1998 and thereafter. Since then some ECE students havetaken the course as an elective. That number has grown over the past three years to about30 in the fall, 2002. Fifty-five
, medicine, andmore. For example, an “Engineering Education Island” virtual world was created via SecondLife [3]. This island featured a virtual laboratory with multiple floors and exhibits such as ACgenerators and DC motors. For creating detailed laboratory exhibits Second Life might be anideal platform. However, users must download software and register for an account, and thecreation of scenes is a labor-intensive task for the instructor. For simple, ready to use scenes tohost small group discussions Mozilla Hubs is a more efficient platform for both instructors andstudents.Figure 1: Mozilla Hubs poster session example. Two students are in a virtual forestdiscussing a draft of a senior design poster. Instead of having all eyes on all participants
: July 1,2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.boisestate.edu/coronavirus-response/campus-reintegration-guide/[3] L. D. Feisel, and A. J. Rosa, "The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education." Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121–130, Jan. 2005. [Online]. Available: WorldCat Discovery,https://boisestate.on.worldcat.org. [Accessed Jun. 16, 2020].[4] S. Yen, Y. Lo, A. Lee, and J. Enriquez, "Learning Online, Offline, and In-Between: Comparing StudentAcademic Outcomes and Course Satisfaction in Face-To-Face, Online, and Blended Teaching Modalities."Education and Information Technologies, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 2141–2153. Mar. 2018. [Online]. Available: WorldCatDiscovery, https://boisestate.on.worldcat.org
students have been familiarized with the fundamental concepts and relationships of science and engineering in general, and of aerospace engineering and aviation, in particular. Two major team projects have been completed and tested. The activities have culminated in an FAA approved flight simulator sessions and the students’ flights aboard Piper Seminole twin-engine airplanes. The participating students have provided extensive positive feedback on the program. To the teaching faculty, this has been a very pleasant and rewarding experience. The outcomes of the two-week Camp have been discussed in detail and some very useful guidelines for successful outreach efforts have been presented. Introduction
students to take the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) exam which is inherently computational, leaving little opportunity to vary teaching methods and topics. 4. Engineering faculty have many responsibilities, including, but not limited to: teaching a heavy course load, laboratory research, writing publications, applying for funding, attending conferences, managing laboratory materials and safety, mentoring students, networking with industry, and professional development. Therefore, professors’ time is often limited, and professors may not see the value in adjusting a preexisting course. 5. Engineering education is often based on precedent; it is slow to accept change, especially relative to liberal arts
author) for the mechanical engineering program, this forced me into an unexpectedsituation. As many other engineering professors can attest, teaching laboratory intensive classesand design courses adds additional layers of complexity within the online delivery mode.The co-author who taught two other sections of senior design and the first author had toimmediately devise a plan on how to continue to deliver a meaningful design experience tostudents online in the middle of the semester. While most programs in the country adjusted theircapstone programs to face the unexpected pandemic, our program had its own set of challengesto overcome. The first concern for the authors was how to continue to provide a meaningfuldesign experience to the students
the middle school classroom, teaching math and science, and consulting with nonprofits, museums, and summer programs.Mr. Eric Steven Hall, North Carolina State University Eric S. Hall Education: • PhD (Student), Education, North Carolina State University (Expected Graduation: 2023) • M.C.E., (Master of Civil Engineering), North Carolina State University, 2011 • M.A., Business, Web- ster University, 1992 • B.A., Mathematics, Syracuse University, 1983 • B.S., Aerospace Engineering, Syracuse University, 1983 Areas of Expertise: Exposure Science; Air Pollution Monitoring; Mercury (Hg) Air Pollution Analysis; Environmental Justice; Environmental Public Health Tracking; Ultraviolet Radiation; Sustainability; Sta
no statistical significant learningoutcomes between the online and in person students. The paper concludes by indicating that onlinelearning can be just as effective, but the students pursuing this option must actually desire this typeof learning and be willing to perform the necessary work to succeed.Key Words: Online Teaching, Hybrid Teaching, Active Learning, Student Assessment1. Introduction Spring 2020 threw both students and faculty roles into a chaotic situation. The Covid-19pandemic swept the globe, and the majority of universities and colleges ceased in personmeeting. This occurred in March and frequently coincided with spring break. Most institutions,cancelled a week of classes to let the faculty prepare to switch all of their
Barriers, Bridges, and the Trolls under the Bridge: Issues in Human Factors Education for Engineers and Others William S. Helton, Michele H. Miller, and Robert Pastel Michigan Technological University Houghton, MichiganAbstractHuman Factors (HF) is the scientific discipline concerned with the interactions amonghumans and built systems. HF requires the knowledge of both human experts(psychology) and machine experts (for example, computer science and mechanicalengineering). In this paper, we will present our observations of teaching HF from theperspective of a psychologist, a mechanical engineer, and a computer scientist. We willdiscuss our observations in
, vol. 44, no. 1-2, pp. 196-221.Minichiello, A., Armijo, D., Mukherjee, S., Caldwell, L., Kulyukin, V., Truscott, T., Elliott,J. & Bhouraskar, A. 2020, "Developing a mobile application-based particle imagevelocimetry tool for enhanced teaching and learning in fluid mechanics: A design-basedresearch approach", Computer Applications in Engineering Education, .Naukkarinen, J. & Sainio, T. 2018, "Supporting student learning of chemical reactionengineering using a socially scaffolded virtual laboratory concept", Education for ChemicalEngineers, vol. 22, pp. 61-68.Newstetter, W.C. 2005, "Designing cognitive apprenticeships for biomedical engineering",Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 207-213.Ng, O.-L. & Chan, T. 2019