-process-control-education/.2. Alford, J. and G. Buckbee, Industrial Process Control Systems: A New Approach to Education. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 2020. 116(12): p. 35-42.3. Aufderheide, B. and M. Wilkes, Process Control Class for the Future Process Engineer. 2019.4. Liu, Q., et al., Engineering co-op and internship experiences and outcomes: The roles of workplaces, academic institutions and students. 2018. 10Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE North Central Section ConferenceCopyright ©2022, American Society for Engineering Education
future analyses.References[1] The National Science Foundation, "Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering", National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, 2019.[2] J. Whittaker, B. Montgomery and V. Acosta, "Retention of Underrepresented Minority Faculty: Strategic Initiatives for Institutional Value Proposition Based on Perspectives from a Range of Academic Institutions", The Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. A136-A145, 2015. [Accessed 15 October 2019].[3] S. L. Dika, M. A. Pando, B. Q. Tempest, K. A. Foxx, and M. E. Allen, "Engineering self-efficacy, interactions with faculty, and other forms of capital for underrepresented
to students to connect in teams any time. Another engagement strategy this instructor listed was to have optional sessions like office hours on Friday for discussion and for Q&A. However, they did not continue this due to lack of interest. Table 1 below shows a summary of the engagement strategies that faculty listed as being used in the Hybrid in-person and Hybrid remote learning environments. There was no difference in the strategies listed by faculty based on the gender, years of teaching, and number of online classes taught. TABLE 1 List of Primary Engagement Strategies in ENED 1100 Hybrid LEs Strategies In-Person RemoteDiscussions
timeto wrap up conversations before resuming. Once in presentation mode, the host can share theircamera, screen, websites, and videos they may wish to show. Hosts can also invite guests on a"stage," where they can share their camera and screen. Presenters also can record the entiresession to share later. While in presentation mode, another helpful feature is the "Q&A" option,where guests can create questions anonymously that they wish to be answered by the presenterand arrange these questions by importance and popularity. This feature can also be used forpolling the audience about selected topics or as a quiz to check for understanding [8]Use of Remo for Classes, Workshops, and Community Outreach Programs Even though the original
children’s STEM learning in a children’s museum. Early Child. Res. Q. 29, 333–344.[14] Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Socio-cultural theory. Mind in society, 6, 52-58.[15] Benson, P. (1997). The philosophy and politics of learner autonomy. In Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 18-34). Longman.[16] Creswell., J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among the five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.[17] Chenail, R. J. (2012). Conducting qualitative data analysis: Qualitative data analysis as a metaphoric process. Qualitative Report, 17(1), 248-253.[18] Carnevale, A. P., Smith, N., & Melton, M. (2011). STEM: Science Technology Engineering Mathematics
Zealand Journal of Law and Education, vol. 13, no.2, 2008, pp. 21-32.[14] A. O. Madan, “Cyber aggression/cyber bullying and the dark triad: effect on workplace behavior/performance,” International Journal of Social, Education, Economics and Management Engineering, vol. 8, no.6, 2014.[15] Q. Li., “Cyberbullying in schools: A research of gender differences,” School Psychology International, vol. 27 no.2, 2006, pp. 157-170.[16] E. M. Lund and S. W. Ross, “Bullying perpetration, victimization, and demographic differences in college students: A review of the literature,” Trauma, Violence and Abuse, vol. 18, no. 3, 2017, pp. 348-360.[17] L. K. Watts, J. Wagner, B. Velasquez, and P. I. Behrens
packed with team building andprofessional development activities. Activities include Skype and in-person alumni talks, industrysite visits and Q&A with engineers, faculty research talks, and a University career center visitwhere staff discusses the college application process, various majors in STEM, alumniconnections and inspirational stories. These features of the camp align with the dimensions ofrelatedness and autonomy in SDT.The code camp was led by a female faculty/lecturer that has extensive experience with teachinglower-level Computer Science courses at the University level. The code camp instruction teamalso included undergraduate student teacher assistants (TAs); two female TAs and one male TA,all of whom were Computer Science
: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/subject_specific_writing/writing_in_engineering/handbook_on _report_formats/reports_and_memos.html. [Accessed: Mar. 4, 2021][18] M. Prince, “Does active learning work: A review of the research,” J. of Eng. Educ., pp. 1- 9, July 2004.[19] Y. Chen, A. K. Awasthi, F. Wei, Q. Tan, and J. Li, “Single-use plastics: Production, usage, disposal, and adverse impacts,” Science of the Total Environ., vol. 752, no. 15, 2021. [Online] Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969720353018. [Accessed: Mar. 4, 2021][20] P. G. Ryan, “Entanglement of birds in plastics and other synthetic materials,” Mar. Pollut. Bull., vol. 135, pp.159-164, Oct. 2018. https
, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1778.[11] L. Watts, “Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication in Distance Learning: A Review of the Literature,” Q. Rev. Distance Educ. Charlotte, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 23-32,56, 2016.[12] M. M. M. Abdelmalak, “Web 2.0 technologies and building online learning communities: students’ perspectives,” Online Learn. J. OLJ, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 87-, Mar. 2015.[13] “70019_Mertler_Chapter_7.pdf.” Accessed: Feb. 19, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://us.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/70019_Mertler_Chapter_7.pdf.[14] S. L. Walker and B. J. Fraser, “Development and Validation of an Instrument for Assessing Distance Education Learning Environments in Higher Education: The Distance
USD and the broader San DiegoEvents justice and encourage and facilitate critical community. Events typically feature a reflection on current practice. speaker or a panel of speakers, followed by discussion/Q+A. Professionals across all disciplines are invited Engagement through invitations toPro Bono to contribute their expertise, time and participate in ExSJ ProfessionalProfessional resources towards projects in support of Development events and CommunityNetwork communities, social and environmental Forums, as well as collaboration on ExSJ justice
and Exposition, USA.[5] M. Q. Patton, “Qualitative evaluation and research methods,” (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 2002.[6] Hsieh, H.-F. & Shannon, S. E. "Three approaches to qualitative content analysis." Qualitative Health Research, vol 15, no. 9, 2005, pp. 1277-1288. SAGE Publications[7] Ryan, Gery W., and H. Russell Bernard. "Techniques to identify themes." Field Methods, vol 15, no. 1, 2003, pp. 85-109. SAGE Publications.[8] St. Pierre, Elizabeth A., and Alecia Y. Jackson. "Qualitative data analysis after coding". Qualitative Inquiry, vol 20, no. 6, 2014, pp. 715-719. SAGE Publications.[9] A. Osterwalder, and Y. Pigneur, “Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers
., & Singh, G. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1262–1289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385943Ye, Q., Wang, D., & Guo, W. (2019). Inclusive leadership and team innovation: The role of team voice and performance pressure. European Management Journal, 37(4), 468–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.01.006
construction safety management and visualization system. Autom. Constr. 33 95–103, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.09.012.[3] Le, Q. T., Pedro, A., & Park, C. S. (2014). A Social Virtual Reality Based Construction Safety Education System for Experiential Learning. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 79(3–4), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-014-0112-z[4] Wu, W., Tesei, A., Ayer, S., London, J., Luo, Y., & Gunji, V. (2018). Closing the Skills Gap: Construction and Engineering Education Using Mixed Reality – A Case Study. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), San Jose, CA, USA, 2018, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2018.8658992.[5] Rudd, T. (2008). Learning spaces and
deviation, no leverage values greater than 0.2, and values for ' 'Cook's distance above1. Also, the assumption of normality was reasonable, as evident by the inspection of the Q-Qplot.We hypothesized that (1) high impact engagement practices will predict academic achievementgoals; (2) course motivation will predict academic achievement goals; (3) confidence atcompleting a degree will predict academic achievement goals. The regression results indicatedthat the model explained 23.9% of the variance and that the model statistically predictedacademic achievement goals, F(3, 489) = 52.45, p = .001, adjusted R2 = .24. This result indicatesa linear relationship in the population, and the multiple regression model is a good fit for thedata. All three
handling and coping skills. The informal gathering took place in fun places in campus, the bowling arena and pooltablezone, where food, drinks, and opportunity drawings were gifted to the students. The workshopsfor on-campus resources, time management and financial planning took place in differentmonths, at least one month appart, at different hours of the day, in the same large classroom withround tables, and consisted of oral presentations, roundtable discussions, printed brochuresoffered to the students, food, drinks and opprtunity drawings. The forum with faculty andindustry professionals took place in a medium sized classroom and consists of a panel discussionfollowed by Q&A. b) Undergraduate Research Experiences To increase the
both in and out of the classroom. In 2020, this activitywas conducted as a virtual webinar and student questions were asked in the Q&A feature whichwas monitored by the meeting host.After listening to the dean’s interview, students are asked to write a one-page reflection paper inwhich they are asked to describe what they learned from the interview: (1) what is needed to besuccessful in the engineering profession; (2) the expectations of, or norms for, engineeringstudents; and (3) the lessons learned from the examples provided regarding the differencebetween successful and unsuccessful engineering teams. These reflections play an important rolein helping students understand the importance of valuing diversity in engineering teams
insophistication of stakeholders also results in higher confidence. 13Bibliography[1] T. D. Sadler, “Situated Learning in Science Education: Socio-scientific Issues as Contexts for Practice,” Stud Sci Educ, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1–42, 2009.[2] A. Johri and B. Olds, “Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the Learning Sciences,” J Eng Educ, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 151–185, 2011.[3] B. Jesiek, Q. Zhu, S. Woo, J. Thompson, and A. Mazzurco, “Global Engineering Competency in Context: Situations and Behaviors,” Online J. Glob. Eng. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2014.[4] G. Downey, “Are Engineers Losing Control of Technology
] S. R. Singer, M. L. Hilton, and H. A. Schweingruber, “America's lab report: Investigations inhigh school science,” National Academies Press, 2005.[10] M. Q. Patton, “Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to EnhanceInnovation and Use,” Guilford Press, 2010.[11] J. L. Glazer, and D. J. Peurach, “School improvement networks as a strategy for large-scaleeducation reform: The role of educational environments,” Educational Policy, vol. 27, pp. 676-710, 2012.[12] H. Preskill, and R. T. Torres, Evaluative inquiry for learning in organizations. SAGEPublications, 1999.[13] J. Clarke, and C. Dede, “Design for scalability: A case study of the River City curriculum,”Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 18, pp. 353-365, 2009
. Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL.Kuratko, D. F. & Morris, M. H. (2018) Examining the Future Trajectory of Entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management. 56(1): 11-23.Li, C. Q., Harichandran, R. S., Erdil, N. O., Carnasciali, M., & Nocito-Gobel, J. (2019). Assessing the growth in entrepreneurial mind-set acquired through curricular and extra- curricular components. Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL.London, J. S., Bekki, J. M., Brunhaver, S. R., Carberry, A. R., McKenna, A. F., (2018). A Framework for Entrepreneurial Mindsets and Behaviors in Undergraduate Engineering Students: Operationalizing the Kern
. Routledge, 2019.[18] N. N. Jones, K. R. Moore, and R. Walton, “Disrupting the Past to Disrupt the Future: An Antenarrative of Technical Communication,” Tech. Commun. Q., vol. 2252, no. 4, pp. 211–229, 2016.[19] “Anti-racist scholarly reviewing practices: A heuristic for editors, reviewers, and authors.” 2021.[20] “Five Faces of Oppression* IRIS MARION YOUNG,” 2014.[21] L. Tuhiwai Smith, Decolonizing Methodology: Research and Indigenous Peoples, 2nd ed. New York: Zen Books, 2012.[22] K. Dotson, “Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing,” Hypatia, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 236–257, Mar. 2011.[23] I. Young, Justice and the Politics of Justice. Princeton University Press, 2014.[24] K. Chavez
construction management program, Int. J. Constr. Educ., 11, 121–139.[8] Ahn, E., & Kim, M., (2016), BIM awareness and acceptance by architecture students in Asia. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 15(3): 419–424. doi: 10.3130/jaabe.15.419.[9] Clevenger, C. M., Glick, S. and del Puerto, C. L. (2012). Interoperable Learning Leveraging Building Information Modeling (BIM) in Construction Education. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 8, 101-118.[10] Lu, W., Peng, Y., Shen, Q., & Li, H. (2013). Generic model for measuring benefits of BIM as a learning tool in construction tasks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(2), 195–203.[11
completing allrequired segments and scoring 80% of quiz points for each module. Supplementing the online components were synchronous Zoom office hours with returningTAs and the CELT instructor. The office hours held the second day of each module. Zoom followup sessions covered classroom management scenarios and open Q&A. Returning TAs attended anadditional Zoom discussion to discuss their experiences, and also provided advice to new TAs inthe discussion board, as mentioned above.ResultsOverall Program: Attendance was mixed. While 500 participants logged in to the academicdepartment orientation day, that was far and away the best attended program. The next mostpopular session was the Division of Information Technology, with 144 students
’22: Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, Jul. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3514094.3534170.[36] J. Li, Y. Liu, L. Yue, F. Jin, Q. Guo, and C. Xu, “Artificial Intelligence Governed by Laws and Regulations,” Reconstructing Our Orders, pp. 61–97, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2209-9_3.[37] S. Krishnan et al., “Artificial Intelligence in Resource-Constrained and Shared Environments,” ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 1–6, Jul. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3352020.3352022.[38] D. J. Musliner, J. A. Hendler, A. K. Agrawala, E. H. Durfee, J. K. Strosnider, and C. J. Paul, “The challenges of real-time AI,” Computer, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 58–66
-level approach. In 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, June 2018. ASEE Conferences. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18260/1-2--29706. https://peer.asee.org/29706. [4] K. Cao, Y. Liu, G. Meng, and Q. Sun. An overview on edge computing research. IEEE Access, 8:85714–85728, 2020. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2991734. [5] Iot connected devices worldwide 2030, Jan 2021. URL https://www.statista.com/statistics/ 802690/worldwide-connected-devices-by-access-technology/. [6] De2i-150 development system, 2021. URL http://de2i-150.terasic.com. [7] Matthew McConnell, Nicholas Barendt, and Kenneth A. Loparo. A framework for remote hardware lab course delivery - rapidly adjusting to 2020. In 2021
online classroom setting,” to be presented at American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Long Beach, California, July 26-29, 2021.[27] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002.[28] A. Khan, O. Egbue, B. Palkie, and J. Madden, “Active learning: Engaging students to maximize learning in an online course,” Electronic Journal of e-Learning, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 107-115, May, 2017.
interest in learning and development. Psychology Press, 2014.[10] W.-C. Mau, “Factors that influence persistence in science and engineering career aspirations,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 234–243, 2003.[11] A. Godwin, “The development of a measure of engineering identity,” 2016.[12] R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown, and G. Hackett, “Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance,” J. Vocat. Behav., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 79–122, 1994.[13] K. L. Meyers, M. W. Ohland, A. L. Pawley, S. E. Silliman, and K. A. Smith, “Factors relating to engineering identity,” Glob. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 119–131, 2012.[14] J. S. Krajcik and P. C. Blumenfeld, Project-based learning, In R
: roadmap and long-term forecast,” Anim. Front., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 36–45, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1093/af/vfaa027.[28] J. W. Creswell and V. L. P. Clark, Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications, 2017.[29] V. Venkatesh, S. A. Brown, and H. Bala, “Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems,” MIS Q., pp. 21– 54, 2013.[30] M. Syed and S. C. Nelson, “Guidelines for Establishing Reliability When Coding Narrative Data,” Emerging Adulthood, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 375–387, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1177/2167696815587648.[31] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in
offering incorporating this project, we will collect data on retention andpersistence of this first cohort in a longitudinal study. The baseline groups will be the cohortsfrom fall 2018 and fall 2019 when a different project focused on robotics was used.References[1] Abrams, L., & Altschuld, J. W., & Lilly, B. W., & Mendelsohn, D. A. (2012, June),Introduction to Mechanical Engineering: A Course in Progress Paper presented at 2012 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. 10.18260/1-2—21609.[2] Dolan, C. (2005, June), Introduction To Engineering At The University Of Wyoming Paperpresented at 2005 Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2—15220.[3] Halyo, N. & Le, Q. (2012, October), “Results of Using
reportedbeing slightly satisfied to satisfied with their choice of engineering major” [4]. In Part II,“100% of student groups were able to reach exemplary and satisfactory levels for LEDprogramming, ECG signal acquisition, and graphics tasks. Post-assessment results alsoaffirmed high levels of engagement and learning for students with the project, even incomparison with students’ general experiences with the problem-based learning approachacross the curriculum” [19].Part III: MATLAB Filtering and Peak DetectionAt the beginning of the ENGR 324L cardiograph lab, the first author taught the class how torecognize the P, Q, R, S, and T waves of the ECG; and how to isolate different frequency rangeswith lowpass, bandpass, and highpass frequency-selective
. Carberry, J. S. London, and A. F. Mckenna, “Development of the Engineering Student Entrepreneurial Mindset Assessment (ESEMA),” Advances in Engineering Education, 7(1), pp. 1–12, 2018. 6. C. Q. Li, R. S. Harichandran, M. I. Carnasciali, N. O. Erdil, and J. Nocito-Gobel, “Development of an instrument to measure the entrepreneurial mindset of engineering students,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, June 2016. 7. S. E. Zappe, “Avoiding construct confusion: An attribute-focused approach to assessing entrepreneurial mindset,” Advances in Engineering Education, 7(1), 1–12. 2018. 8. J. D. Novak and B. Gowin, Learning How to Learn, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1984, pp. 36