Session ETD 475 An Interactive Learning System for Cyber Security Education Te-Shun Chou Department of Technology Systems College of Engineering and Technology East Carolina UniversityAbstractThis paper describes a learning system that uses virtualization technology to build a multiplayercyber-attack and defense learning system infrastructure. The infrastructure emulated a realisticnetwork that included numerous student network environments. Virtual machines wereimplemented in each student’s network
, As- sociate Director of the Learning Agents Center (http://lac.gmu.edu), Co-Director of IT Entrepreneurship Laboratory (http://lite.gmu.edu) and Co-Director ofHarry J Foxwell, George Mason University Harry is currently Associate Professor at George Mason University’s Department of Information Sciences and Technology. He earned his doctorate in Information Technology in 2003 from George Mason Univer- sity’s Volgenau School of Engineering (Fairfax, VA), and has since taught graduate courses there in big data analytics and ethics, operating systems, computer architecture and security, cloud computing, and electronic commerce.Dr. Ioulia Rytikova, George Mason University Ioulia Rytikova is a Professor and an
: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2133), 20180085.4. Siau, K., Wang, W. (2018). Building trust in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and robotics. Cutter Business Technology Journal, 31(2), 47-53.Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference 8Copyright © 2024, American Society for Engineering Education
-focused design is necessary for developing entrepreneurial tendencies withinthe minds of engineering students. The challenge, then, is understanding how to effectively instill a customer focus in engineeringstudents, a task that requires knowledge of how engineers learn. As it stands, engineering studentsin our colleges today do not relate well to traditional engineering pedagogy, such as the directtransmission model, which has remained the norm for the past few centuries (Freeman et al., 2014).The current generation of students is looking for a curriculum and educational approach that usesadvanced classroom technology and active learning to engage them in the learning process (Freemanet al., 2014, Mina and Gerdes, 2006). A novel approach that
are preparedto utilize a team-oriented and cross-disciplinary approach to curriculum development anddelivery.Interdisciplinary teams made up of faculty from mathematics, English, science,Engineering Technology, and Information Systems were formed at each of fiveparticipating two-year colleges in Tennessee. Partners from Engineering Technologydepartments at four-year colleges in the southeast, secondary schools (Tech Prep), andindustry augmented these faculty teams.Establishing, implementing, and assessing faculty internships in the TEFATE projectyielded many lessons. Pilot internships allowed project staff to identify the challenges tobe faced in conducting an internship program, as well as techniques that were successfulin developing and
Criterion 3.H and Beyond. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.4. Dave, J. & Dong, J. (2010). Global Experiential Learning for Engineering Technology Students. American Society for Engineering Education (AC2010-1718).5. Farris, J. & Lane, P.M. (2011). International Co-op Experience at the Base of the Economic Pyramid for Engineering Students. American Society for Engineering Education (AC 2011-418).6. Gattis, C. & Edwards, F. (2007). Lessons Learned: Our First Engineering Study Abroad Program. American Society of Engineering Education (Ac 2007-1449).7. Parkinson, A. (2007). Engineering Study Abroad Programs: Formats, Challenges, Best Practices. American Society
Cognitive Domain,” New York: McKay, 1956.PHILLIP CORNWELLPhillip Cornwell is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He received hisPh.D. from Princeton University in 1989 and his present interests include structural dynamics, structural healthmonitoring, and undergraduate engineering education. Dr. Cornwell has received an SAE Ralph R. TeetorEducational Award in 1992, and the Dean’s Outstanding Teacher award at Rose-Hulman in 2000.RICHARD LAYTONRichard Layton received his Ph.D. from the University of Washington in 1995 and is currently an AssistantProfessor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman. Prior to his academic career, Dr. Layton worked for twelveyears in consulting engineering, culminating as a group
this summer.’ For me, thatlifestyle is not realistic. Finally, my department already has 25 tenured or tenure-track personnelwho have a research focus – what we really need is at least one faculty member who has thetime, energy, and desire to focus on undergraduate students.”Faculty Member #2. The second faculty member is 38 years old and graduated with a B.S. inConstruction in 1995 and an M.S. in Construction Management in 1999. She joined the CivilEngineering Department at Montana State University in 2000 as an Adjunct Instructor inConstruction Engineering Technology (CET). She teaches both undergraduate and graduateclasses; advises 45 undergraduate CET students; serves as the Director of the Internship programat MSU for both Civil and
edu- cation can become more effective, efficient, and inclusive.Dr. Vinod K. Lohani, Virginia Tech Dr. Vinod K. Lohani is a Professor of Engineering Education and also serves as the Director of education and global initiatives at an interdisciplinary research institute called the Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science (ICTAS) at Virginia Tech. He is the founding director of an interdisciplinary lab called Learning Enhanced Watershed Assessment System (LEWAS) at VT. He received a Ph.D. in civil engineering from VT. His research interests are in the areas of computer-supported research and learning systems, hydrology, engineering education, and international collaboration. He has served as a PI or
Education 1access, retrieve, evaluate, use and communicate information will be critical in a global informationsociety characterized by rapid technological change. Engineers who possess a more thoroughknowledge of information retrieval strategies and information resources will be more effective ineducating themselves.” [1]. Thus begins an abstract for a 1994 conference paper. The need forinformation literacy has not decreased since that time. While students arrive on campus verycomfortable with the World Wide Web, they are not trained in efficient use of electronic ortraditional resources, nor are they necessarily able to evaluate resources for
the initial obstacles. One major problem is the feeling ofProceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Copyright ©2001American Society for Engineering Education. Session 1353many students that they are disadvantaged compared to students who arrive with Pilot’s Licensesand technologically-advanced backgrounds. The opportunity for iteration is extremely importanthere. One idea which has worked well is to return the initial assignment in this course, withcomments and grades of “A” or “incomplete”, the latter requiring re-submission of theassignment. This overcomes the tendency of some
. 2021, pp. 1-5, doi:10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637253.[7] A. J. Swart, LM. Coughlan, N. Joannou, “Student perspectives of a peer mentorshipprogramme introduced at a university of technology in South Africa”, Global Journal ofEngineering Education, vol 23, no. 3, pp. 220, Dec. 2019.[8] L. S. Nadelson, P. L. Dickrell, K. DeJesus, “Mentoring for Making: Peer Mentors Workingwith Learners in a Making-Focused Engineering Course”, Presented at the 2024 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon, USA, June 2024, doi: 10.18260/1-2--47770[9] A. C. Alves, F. Moreira, C. P. Leão, S. Teixeira, “Tutoring Experiences in PBL of IndustrialEngineering and Management Program: Teachers vs Students”, Presented at the ASME 2017International Mechanical
. This capstone project team shows interesting diversity and inclusion. Three out of fivestudents of this capstone project are male engineering students and two of them are femaleengineering students. The majority of them are related to Hispanic students. Texas A&MUniversity at College Station is a Hispanic-serving institution. For the ethnicity breakdown of theTexas A&M University at College Station, white students are 57.0%, Hispanic students are25.0%, Asian students are 10.4%, and black students are 2.8% in Fall 2021 [6]. For the ethnicitybreakdown of the first author’s Department of Engineering Technology and IndustrialDistribution (ETID), the total of white students is 54.3%, the total of Hispanic students is 28.5%and the total of
and international organizations in the field of online technologies. He is Founder and Chair of the annual international ICL and REV conferences and Chair or member of the program committees of several international confer- ences and workshops. He is Editor-in-Chief of the international journals of Online Engineering (iJOE, http://www.i-joe.org/), Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET, http://www.i-jet.org/), and Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM, http://www.i-jim.org/). Auer is Founding President and CEO of the Inter- national Association of Online Engineering (IAOE) since 2006, a non-governmental organization that promotes the vision of new engineering working environments worldwide. In Sept. 2010, he was
Paper ID #38796Board 317: Improving Undergraduate STEM Writing: A CollaborationBetween Instructors and Writing Center Directors to Improve Peer-WritingTutor FeedbackDr. Robert Weissbach, Indiana University - Purdue University, Indianapolis Robert Weissbach is currently chair of the department of engineering technology at IUPUI. From 1998 - 2016 he was with Penn State Behrend as a faculty member in Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology. His research interests are in renewable energy, energy storage, and engineering education.Ms. Ruth Camille Pflueger, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend Ruth Pflueger has been the
application of the method. Modern finiteelement developments have become very sophisticated, and the available softwaredeveloped for the user has become very easy to use. It has become more important thanever to insure that the analyst, in his/her search for the best modeling method, correctlyuses the tools available.What Type of Education is Required to Carry Out a Proper Element Analysis?When FEM first appeared in the 1960's it was introduced into the engineering curriculumat the graduate level. As the method and computer technology matured, FEM wasintroduced at the undergraduate level in engineering and engineering technologyprograms, even in some two-year technology programs. Graphical user-friendlyinterfaces (GUI) have significantly reduced the
werefunctioning as managers of computer, farming and engineering operations. One was themanager of a rural solar and alternative energy educational center. One was the manager of acomputer school and another was the manager of 50 workers at a newly developed coffeeplantation (since 2000). The team had the opportunity to attend a university building dedicationceremony at which the President of Uganda acknowledged the presence and work of a researchagriculturalist. The team also had the opportunity to observe a meeting of a regional HIV/AIDSworking group which was made up of approximately 75 % women. However, it should bepointed out that all of the secondary science teachers, secondary school headmasters, and facultyin the technology programs at the
Paper ID #38787Work in Progress: Evaluation of 360 Coaching to Support Whole-StudentAdvising in the First-YearDr. Sophia T. Santillan, Duke University Sophia Santillan joined Duke as an assistant professor of the practice in summer 2017. As a STEM educator, she is interested in the effect of emerging technology and research on student learning and classroom practice. After earning her bachelor’s, masterDr. Linda P. Franzoni, Duke UniversityDr. Stacy L. Tantum, Duke University Stacy Tantum received the B.S. in Electrical Engineering and Economics from Tufts University in 1994, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical
firms intransportation/civil industry across California. They have been major contributors to providing asafe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system to enhance California’s economyand livability. 6The education outcomes include: 1) Deep understanding of the entire highway project development process at Caltrans 2) Strong engagement with faculty member, Caltrans engineers and other consultants 3) Great team effort 4) Enhanced project management skills (set up meeting agenda, group discussion, keep track of the progress, etc.) 5) Familiar with cutting-edge technologies (3D printing, 3D visualization, 3D micro
, and mixed research methods in engineering education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 53–66, 2009.[6] J. W. Creswell and V. L. Plano Clark, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 2nd ed. SAGE Publications, Inc., 2010.[7] T. Dececchi, M. E. Timperon, and B. B. Dececchi, “A study of barriers to women’s engineering education,” J. Gend. Stud., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 21–38, 1998.[8] C. Hill, C. Corbett, and A. St Rose, “Why so few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics,” 2010.[9] K. L. Tonso, “Student learning and gender,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 143–150, 1996.[10] E. Seymour and N. M. Hewitt, Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduate Leave the Sciences
Paper ID #31373Pair-to-Pair Peer LearningDr. Nebojsa I Jaksic P.E., Colorado State University, Pueblo NEBOJSA I. JAKSIC earned the Dipl. Ing. degree in electrical engineering from Belgrade University (1984), the M.S. in electrical engineering (1988), the M.S. in industrial engineering (1992), and the Ph.D. in industrial engineering from the Ohio State University (2000). He is currently a Professor at Colorado State University-Pueblo teaching robotics and automation courses. Dr. Jaksic has over 90 publications and holds two patents. Dr. Jaksic’s interests include robotics, automation, and nanotechnology engineering
Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference. St Louis, MO: (2000).12. Veal, D., Maj S. P. Fetherston A. & Kohli, G. Competency Based Assessment Techniques for use in a ComputerInstallation & Maintenance Unit. In The 3rd Baltic Region Seminar on Engineering Education. Goteborg, Sweden:(1999).13. Veal, D., Maj, S.P., & Swan. G. I., Physics: Implications for Computer Technology Education. In The American Page 9.1080.8 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationSociety for
Engineering and Technology (ABET) standards [4]. These standards aredesigned to provide students with the proper foundation to perform and succeed in industry aftergraduation. Therefore, professors must prioritize these standards and requirements in shapingtheir courses, while also developing interactive and compelling coursework that engagesstudents.Frequently, qualitative surveys and interviews are used to understand students' perspectives onengineering courses [1]. Surveys and interviews can provide windows into the studentexperience navigating course content and can offer insight into potential improvements that maybenefit students. However, many times the student voice itself is underrepresented in literature asthe data collected is analyzed and
of these teams. Educational institutions, unlike business, continues to educate students within particular functionalareas. While education serves many purposes, including stimulating students to acquire and utilize knowledgeto think critically, from a more practical viewpoint, education should assist students in developing skillsapplicable to their future careers. To prepare graduates for work in an interdisciplinary environment, cross-functional courses should be developed at the undergraduate level to expose students to the types ofinterdisciplinary problem-solving and team activities they will encounter in industry. At the University of Dayton, the Department of Industrial Engineering Technology in the School ofEngineering
Paper ID #21499Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) and Evaluation Using Ultrasonic Testing Equip-ment to Enhance Workforce Skillset for Modern ManufacturingDr. Aditya Akundi, University of Texas, El Paso Aditya Akundi is currently affiliated to Industrial Manufacturing and Systems Engineering department, and Research Institute for Manufacturing and Engineering Systems at University of Texas, ElPaso. He earned a Bachelor of Technology in Electronics and Communication Engineering from Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, India. He earned a Master of Science in Electrical and Computer En- gineering at the University of Texas
the Astrodynamics Division Chief and the Deputy Department Head in the Department of Astronautics. Dr. Brown retired from the military in 2007 as a Lt. Col. and has continued his service to the Academy as a member of the civilian faculty. EDUCATION: 1986 Bachelor of Science degree in Astronautical Engineering, U.S. Air Force Academy, CO 1990 Master of Science degree in Engineering Administration, George Washington University, Washington, DC 1992 Squadron Officer School, Maxwell AFB, AL 1994 Master of Science degree in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 1999 Doctor of
Session 1602 Electronic Circuit Design and Analysis for Space Applications Biswajit Ray Dept. of Physics and Engineering Technology Bloomsburg University Bloomsburg, PA 17815AbstractElectronic circuit design and analysis in commercial applications takes into account componentparameter variations due to initial tolerance, temperature, and aging. For space applications, theadditional component parameter variation due to radiation needs to be taken into account. Thecharged particles in space radiation
) groups in the IPERF program. The programpublicized widely the results in scientific and general journals to promote the visibility of manysuccess stories. These included HBCU-Matters Magazine, A House of Representatives poster Proceedings of the 2024 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2024, American Society for Engineering Education ETD 535sessions, numerous ASEE conferences, Scientia International, and Technology InternationalMagazine.The sections below describe several support programs the ASEE project team offers to theFellows. These support programs are helping achieve the desired
Copyright © 2025, American Society for Engineering Education 7Essa, S., Çelik, T., & Human-Hendricks, N. (2023). Personalized adaptive learning technologies basedon machine learning techniques to identify learning styles: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access,11, 48392–48409. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3276439Farrelly, T., & Baker, N. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence: Implications and considerations forhigher education practice. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111109Figueroa, B., & Eaton, S. (2023). Examining recommendations for artificial intelligence use withintegrity from a scholarship of teaching and learning lens. RELIEVE - Revista
Paper ID #14488Importance of Undergraduate Research: Efficacy and Student PerceptionsProf. Sudhir Kaul, Western Carolina University Dr. Kaul is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Western Carolina University. His re- search interests include Fracture Diagnostics, Structural Dynamics and Control, and Motorcycle Dynam- ics.Dr. Chip W. Ferguson, Western Carolina University Chip Ferguson is the Associate Dean of the Kimmel School and Associate Professor of Engineering and Technology at Western Carolina University.Dr. Paul M. Yanik, Western Carolina University Dr. Paul Yanik is an Assistant Professor of