Asee peer logo
Displaying results 34951 - 34980 of 35543 in total
Conference Session
Support and Partnership Opportunities
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
John Ochs
withglobally dispersed development teams [Refs 2 and 3]. As mentioned above the MBAprogram now offers a certificate program in entrepreneurship called the Venture series. Inaddition, our Manufacturing System Engineering offers a graduate course for newproduct development within a corporate framework.Entrepreneurship teaching – undergraduate: Since the mid 1990’s Lehigh has offeredan award winning cross-disciplinary program in Integrated Product Development (IPD)for students in engineering, business and the design arts. For the past six years, theprogram has focused on technical entrepreneurship through new product development,with industry sponsorship of cross-disciplinary student teams [Ref 4]. The IPD programhas also engaged local entrepreneurs and
Conference Session
Web Education I: Delivery and Evaluation
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Mike Bowman; Cliff Goodwin
11As can be seen in Fig 2, higher FC causes higher TC which results in a higher BE point.This is the concern when comparing the traditional courses with online courses. Twoways to compensate or correct for this higher BE Point is to charge a higher course feefor the online course or increase the number of students in the online course at the oldfee.Twigg’s Cost for his Online course within a Mature SystemUsing data collected by the authors and applying them to Professor Twigg”s onlinecourse, we calculated the fixed costs for his online MET 111 course. Twigg’s Start-up Costs (Fixed cost) Hours Course Development $8,000 One course reduction 3,000
Conference Session
Mobile Robotics in Education
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Steve Richards; Daniel Pack; David Ahlgren; Igor Verner
appear in IEEE Trans. on Education.[8] J. P. Perlin, D.J. Pack, B.E. Mullins, and R.E. Speakman, “Senior Capstone Design Experience: HoveringRobot,” Proc. of the 2003 ASEE Conference, Nashville, TN, June, 2003.[9] D.J. Pack and B.E. Mullins, “Toward Finding an Universal Search Algorithm for Swarm Robots,” Proceedings2003 IEEE/RJS Conference on Intelligent Robotic Systems (IROS), Las Vegas, Nevada, October 2003.[10] T. Hsiu, S. Richards, A. Bhave, A. Perez-Bergquist, I. Nourbakhsh. "Designing a Low-cost, ExpressiveEducational Robot." In Proceedings of IROS 2003, Las Vegas.AppendixThis syllabus is used in the first semester senior design course at the United States Air ForceAcademy. Lesson Topic Meet In Class
Conference Session
Assessment Issues I
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Mary A. Nelson; Barbara Olds; Ronald Miller; Ruth Streveler
engineering majors, two femalesand four males), asking each of them to answer three or four questions, explaining theirthought processes out loud as they did so. The students were volunteers who wereselected on a first-come basis and compensated for their time. We followed a protocolduring the sessions: first we gave the student a written copy of each question and thenread it aloud. We asked the student to tell us what concept s/he thought the questionaddressed and then asked him or her to solve the problem thinking aloud and usingsketches, notes, etc., if desired. We asked questions intended to probe the students’thought processes as they solved the problems and tape-recorded the sessions for latertranscription and analysis. We also collected all
Conference Session
Minorities in Engineering/Technology
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
John Norton
: The Mars Society Of CaltechHuman Exploration Of Mars Endeavor, 2000.4 S. J Hoffman,., and D. L Kaplan, ed., Human Exploration of Mar: The Reference Mission of the NASA MarsExploration Study Team, http://exploration.jsc.nasa.gov/marsref/contents.html, 1997.5 R. Zubrin and R. Wagner, The Case for Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet and Why We Must, 1996.6 T. Kammash and M.-J.Lee, “Gasdynamic Fusion Propulsion System for Space Exploration”, Journal of Propulsionand Power, 3, pp. 544-53, 1995.7 Zubrin, ibid.8JOHN W. NORTON, JR.John W. Norton, Jr. (jnorton@umich.edu) is working on his doctorate at the University of Michigan in civilinfrastructure systems with a focus on optimal drinking water technology implementation under the direction
Conference Session
Trends in Construction Engineering I
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Sunil Sinha; Randolph Thomas; John Kulka
. W. (2001). ‘Construction Contracts,’ McGraw Hill, New York.9. Hinze, J. W. (2001). ‘Construction Safety,’ Prentice Hall, New Jersey.10. Huband, F.L. (ed.) (1998), How Do You Measure Success? Designing Effective Processes for Assessing Engineering Education, ASEE Professional Books, Washington, D.C.11. Koehn, E. (1997), "Engineering Perceptions of ABET Accreditation Criteria," Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 123(2), 66-70.12. Online Ethics Center for Engineering & Science, National Science Foundation (1999), http:// onlineethics.org.13. Pfatteicher, S.K.A. (1999), "EC2000 and the Engineering Ethics Dilemma," http://onlineethics.org/text/essays/pfatteicher.html.14. Roland, S., and Martin, M
Conference Session
International Engineering Education II
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Roberto Montoya
agreements and the establishment of foreign universities in the country• Trans-national education• Modernizing the curriculum• Learning to learn• ICT`s and the pedagogical viewpoints• Higher education and the workforce (unemployment vs. making go-getters)In recent times, the way that universities, and therefore higher education in general, has becomea part of an increasingly globalized world, has changed. In this new scenario it is possible tosingle out the processes that tend towards the internationalization of higher learning. Theconstant and growing amount of exchanges amongst researchers and scholars, the many jointprojects undertaken by international groups and the mobility, real and virtual, that undergraduateand graduate students
Conference Session
TIME 7: ABET Issues and Capstone Courses
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
David Pape
Engineering Departments, Saginaw Valley State University, May 1999. 5. K. Scales, C. Owen, S. Shiohare, M. Leonard. Preparing for Program Accreditation Review Under ABET Engineering Criteria 2000: Choosing Outcome Indicators, Journal of Engineering Education, July 1998, pp. 207-210. 6. Joint Task Force on Engineering Education Assessment. A General Assessment Framework, in How Do You Measure Success?: Designing Effective Processes for Assessing Engineering Education, ASEE Professional Books, 1998, pp. 17-26. Page
Conference Session
Innovative Classroom Techniques
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Yasar Demirel
& Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education12. M.S. Zwyno, Engineering Faculty Teaching Styles and Attitudes toward Student-Centered and Teaching- Enabled Teaching Strategies, Proceedings of 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 1122, Nashville, Tennessee (2003).13. M.S. Zywno, A contribution to Validation of Score Meaning for Felder-Soloman’s Index of Learning Styles, Proceedings of 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 2351, Nashville, Tennessee (2003).14. D. Elger, J. Beller, S. Beyerlein, B. Williams, Performance Criteria for Quality in Problem Solving, Proceedings of 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 2230
Conference Session
Emerging Trends in Engineering Education
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Ken Ports; Carolyn Fausnaugh; Muzaffar Shaikh; Carmo D'Cruz
Florida Tech. She is also the Co-Director of Florida TechStart, the Florida Institute of Technology’sbusiness accelerator. Prior to joining the university, she was a practicing CPA for 25 years and founder of CarolynJ. Fausnaugh Associates, CPA’s. In the early 1990’s she was a member of the founding team of InternetU, the firstInternet Service Provider in Brevard County, Florida. Page 9.1152.15 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education
Conference Session
Teamwork, K-12: Projects to Promote Engineering
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Craig Gunn
Observations and Results guidelines (specifics follow)Equations: 24. Equations are numbered 25. Punctuation with equations (: with follow/s/ing only) 26. Equations have spaceFigures/Tables: 27. Figure/Table labels correct. (Figure 1. Title) 28. Figures oriented correctly, clearly labeled and referencedLab ObservationsAnalysis29. Mathematical model used to predict system behavior presented with ample explanation and lead in.Experimental Equipment and Procedure30. Schematic of equipment used31. Highlights of equipment used32. Highlights of the procedure (not specific steps)Results33. Data presented with clear indication of what data applies to34. Reader will understand what this data refers to35. Trends in data stated
Conference Session
ASEE Multimedia Session
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Blaine Lilly; John Merrill
limited productionplanned for late Spring 2003. The pilot run is expected to run in the Summer of 2003.Curriculum materials will be finalized in the Autumn along with mass production of parts for fullimplementation in Winter 2004.Bibliography1. Crawford, P., Little, M., 2002, “Collaboration Among Educators for True Innovative Programming,” Journal of Teacher Education and Special Education, 25(3):320-324.2. Duerden, S., Graham, J.M., Garland, J., Doak, B., McCarter, J., Roedel, R.J., Evans, D.L., Williams, P., 1997, “Scaling Up Arizona State University's First-Year Integrated Program in Engineering: Problems and Solutions,” Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference.3. Frair, K., 1995, “An Integrated First Year Curriculum at the
Conference Session
Effective Teaching to Motivate & Retain
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Reid Vander Schaaf; Ronald Welch
Class Problems S-N curves, etc.9 Write effectively Lab & EDP Reports 5 Students turn in 6 written technical reports10 Speak effectively In-Class Discussions 2 Most students called on at least once per class.11 Knowledge of contemporary issues Student Discussion 2 We do bring current engineering issues into the classroom; develop an interest board in the classroom.12 Broad education to understand the impact of In-Class Discussions and 2 Mostly sidebar discussions as
Conference Session
Innovative Hands-On Projects and Labs
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Nasir Bilal; Harold Kess; Douglas Adams
Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers”, John Wiley &Sons, Inc., New York, NY.Creighton, L. L, April 2001, “Kicking Old Habits”, ASEE Prism, pp. 32-34.Denton, D. D., January 1998, “Engineering Education for the 21st Century: Challenges and Opportunities”, Journalof Engineering Education, pp. 19-22.Doderer, E. S., and Giolma, J. P., 1995, “If You Want to Teach Engineering”, Proceedings of the ASEE AnnualConference, pp. 1351-1355. Page 8.421.14Dugas, R., 1988, “A History of Mechanics”, Dover Publications, Inc., New York, NY. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society of Engineering Education
Conference Session
Innovation in Design Education
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Patsy Brackin; Clark Merkel
suggestthe teams work with rolled tubular elements made from the newspaper and tape. There isno set length that their bridge must span, however the winning team will be the one that isable to support the book for a given period of time (30 s) while spanning the largestdistance. This exercise is a good one to hold after the students have been introduced tothe topic of truss forces.Variation: For an even tougher challenge substitute a roll of toilet paper for thenewspaper.Decision Making Activities:Activity 11: Sporting Predictions using Group Decision MakingMaterials Required: A listing of teams in a tournament of interest to studentsGoal: to demonstrate one method for group decision making and consensus developmentDescription: Assign students to a
Conference Session
ASEE Multimedia Session
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Susan J.S. Lasser; Ronnie Chrestman; Matthew Ohland
look at the lives of minority mathematics studentsin college. The College Mathematics Journal, 23(5), 362-372.9 Treisman, P. U., & Surles, S. (2001). Systematic reform and minority student high achievement. Washington,DC: Institute of Medicine (NAS). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 460199)10 Collins, Rachel E., General Engineering home page, as of January 12, 2003, http://www.ces.clemson.edu/ge/11 Clemson University College of Engineering and Science History, http://www.ces.clemson.edu/about/history.htm12 Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange report, http://www.occe.ou.edu/csrde/13 Clemson World, Winter 2002, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, p. 31.14 Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange report, http
Conference Session
Recruiting, Retention & Advising
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Taryn Bayles
Excellent 8 6 Numbe r of Re sponse s 4 2 0 a Excellent b Very Good c d Good e Fair g ABET Obje ctiv e Poor
Conference Session
Technological Literacy II
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Steven VanderLeest
Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics,v 7, 2002, p 420-425.17 Langan-Fox, J; Wirth, A.; Code, S.; Langfield-Smith, K.; Wirth, A., “Analyzing shared and team mentalmodels,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, v 28, n 2, 2001, p 99-112.18 Carlson , W. Bernard, “Toward a Philosophy of Engineering: The Role of Representation,” Proceedings of the2003 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference, Nashville, Tennessee, June, 2003.19 Thatcher, Andrew, Greyling, Mike, “Mental models of the Internet,” International Journal of IndustrialErgonomics, v 22, n 4-5, Nov, 1998, p 299-305.20 Thatcher and Greyling, p. 300.21 Thatcher and Greyling, p. 300.22 Pacey, p. 13.23 Busby, J. A. and Lloyd, P. A., “Influences on
Conference Session
Course and Program Assessment
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Abi Aghayere
6 5 4 3 2 1 0 n ip ce s t
Conference Session
Assessment in BME Education
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Peter Mente; Marian McCord; Joni Spurlin; H. Troy Nagle; Susan Blanchard
N Are BME Curriculum Committee Review PEOs with PEOs (faculty, students, alum(s)) BME Advisory Board and appropriate? revises PEOs other constituent groups in fall of even years Y BME Curr. Com. develops outcomes for each PEO Outcomes N are assessable and measurable? Y Y
Conference Session
Building Cross-Disciplinary Partnerships
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Todd A. Watkins; Drew Snyder; John Ochs
faculty participants To develop a § Run pilot freshman courses o Faculty/students feedback freshman pr ojects § Refine material s based on on adapted curriculum course to introduce feedback o Document implementation new students to § Determine scalability process technical § Develop sustai nable
Conference Session
Mechanical ET Design & Capstone
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Francis Di Bella
ofthese Case Studies taken from the author’s Instructional Lecture Notes, keep in mind thegeneral common features that are intended to attract the attention of the reader (thestudent engineer):1. The attempt to seamless integrate (some would say “sneak up on the student”) theengineering problem or life situation into a cultural setting,2. The clear references to names and dates in a readable style that is done in a writingstyle that is less of the sterile engineering that is often found in technical papers and textsand more of a common language.3. The action item(s) at the end of the Case Study presentation that attempts to have thestudent study or at least appreciate the human or social content of the situation as well asengineering content.4
Conference Session
Engineering Economy Frontiers
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Phillip Rosenkrantz
, Guan S. Examining the range of student needs in the design and development of aweb-based course. In: Abbey B, ed. Instructional and cognitive impacts of web-based education. Hershey, PA: IdeaGroup Publishing; 2000. 7. Rogers PL. Layers of navigation for hypermedia environments: designing instructional web sites.In: Abbey B, ed. Instructional and cognitive impacts of web based education. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing;2000.BiographyDR. PHILLIP R. ROSENKRANTZProfessor at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona since 1982. IE and IE supervisor for General Motorsfor 9 years prior to entering academia. He holds a doctorate in organizational leadership from PepperdineUniversity; MS in Statistics from UC Riverside; MS in
Conference Session
The Computer, the Web, and the ChE
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
William Baratuci; Angela Linse
Technology in the Introductory Chemical Engineering Course, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings 2000.4 - Regan, M., Sheppard, S. (1996). Interactive Multimedia Courseware and the Hands-on Learning Experience: An Assessment Study, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 85, no. 2, pp.123-131.5 – Williamson, C., Bernhard, J., Chamberlin, K. (2000). Perspectives on an Internet-based Synchronous Learning Experience, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 89, no. 1, pp.53-61.6 - Crynes, B., Lai, Y., Chung, W. (19??). Chemical Engineering Fundamentals – Better Learning Through Computer-Based Delivery, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings 19??.7 - Dutton, J., Dutton, M., Perry, J. (2001). Do Online Students perform as Well as Lecture Students
Conference Session
Issues of Concern to New Faculty
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Craig Quadrato
with each class, I’m not sure I could say Ilooked forward to the students’ final evaluations. But since I planned, prepared, performed eachclass and received interim feedback from my students, peers and senior instructors, I feel Isignificantly improved my skills as an instructor in a short amount of time. And, perhaps moreimportantly, I have implemented a personal teaching model that will continue to help methroughout my career.Bibliography1. Lowman, Joseph. Mastering the Techniques of Teaching (2 nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass 1995. Page 7.1005.112. Oreovicz, Frank S. and Phillip C Wankat. Teaching Engineering (reprinted by ASCE
Conference Session
Projects to promote eng.; teamwork,K-12
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Anant Kukreti
in Figures 6(a) and 6(b) are actually idealized as aspring-mass system model shown in Figure 6(c) for mathematical analysis. In all the threemodels shown in Figure 6, the mass M has one degree-of-freedom and can vibrate horizontally.The stiffness K represents the stiffness of the column(s), which can be experimentally ortheoretically determined from the following formula: K = 12EI/L3, if the top end of the columndoes not rotate, and 3EI/L3, if the top end of the column does rotate. In these formulae E =modulus of elasticity of the column material, I = moment of inertia of the column cross-section,and L = clear height of the column. If perfect similitude rules can be developed for scaling boththe geometric dimensions and material properties
Conference Session
Trends in Mechanical Engineering
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Washington Braga
, M. G., "In search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms",ASCD Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, Virginia, 1993[5] Braga, W. "Online Heat Transfer Course," available at http://venus.rdc.puc -rio.br/wbraga/tc.htm, inportuguese, 2000[6] Bloom, B.S., "Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Class ification of Educational Goals, Handbook I:Cognitive Domain," David McKay Company, New York, 1956[7] Zahorian, S.A., Lakdawala, V.K., González, O.R., Starsman S. & Leathrum Jr, J.F., "Question Model forIntelligent Questioning Systems in Engineering Educ ation", Proceedings of 2001 Frontiers in EducationConference, FIE 2001, Reno, Nevada, 2001[8] Shulze, K,. Shelby, R., Treacy, D., &
Conference Session
Outreach: Future Women in Engineering
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Donna Whiting; Marion Usselman
America’s schools shortchange girls. New York: Page 7.586.12 Charles Scribners’s Sons. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ã 2002, American Society for Engineering Education3 Through NSF grant HRD#97-11046—SummerScape: Gender Equitable Science for Students and Teachers4 Through NSF grant HRD#94-53106—InGEAR: Integrating Gender Equity and Reform5 Crawford, S. H. (1996). Beyond dolls and guns: 101 ways to help children avoid gender bias. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.6 Sandler, B.R. and Hoffman, E. (1992) Teaching faculty members to
Conference Session
Curriculum Development in Graphics
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
David Forsman; Kathryn Holliday-Darr; Michael Lobaugh
Institute Handbook. Pacific Crest Inc. Corvallis, Oregon. Page 7.943.13 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright  2002, American Society for Education Education 6. Johnson, S. (1988). “Who Moved My Cheese? An Amazing Way to Deal with Change in Your Work & in Your Life”. Penguin Putnam Inc, New York, New York.DAVID R. FORSMANDavid R. Forsman is an Instructor of Engineering at Penn State Erie. He received his B.S. in EngineeringTechnology from the Pennsylvania State University and his M.E. in Manufacturing
Conference Session
K-20 Activities in Materials Science
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
William Jordan; Bill Elmore
and Exposition, Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”20. Sivertsen. M. (1993). State of the art: Transforming ideas for teaching and learning science. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department of Education, OERI Education Information.Biographical InformationWILLIAM JORDAN is Professor and Program Chair of Mechanical Engineering at Louisiana Tech University. Hehas B.S. and M.S. degrees in Metallurgical Engineering from the Colorado School of Mines. He has an M.A. degreefrom Denver Seminary. His Ph.D. was in mechanics and materials engineering from Texas A & M University. Heteaches materials oriented courses and his main research area deals with the mechanical behavior of compositematerials. He is a registered