Asee peer logo
Displaying results 331 - 360 of 2236 in total
Conference Session
Instrument Design and Development
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Madalyn Wilson-Fetrow, University of New Mexico; Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Andrew Olewnik, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] C. B. Zoltowski, P. M. Buzzanell, A. O. Brightman, D. Torres, and S. M. Eddington, “Understanding the Professional Formation of Engineers through the Lens of Design Thinking: Unpacking theWicked Problem of Diversity and Inclusion,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Proc., Jun. 2017, Accessed: Dec. 06, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10036285-understanding-professional-formation-engineers- through-lens-design-thinking-unpacking-thewicked-problem-diversity-inclusion[2] B. Frank, D. Strong, R. Sellens, and L. Clapham
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alison K Polasik, Campbell University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
. D. Jones et al, "An analysis of motivation constructs with first‐year engineering students:Relationships among expectancies, values, achievement, and career plans," J Eng Educ, vol. 99,(4), pp. 319-336, 2010.[2] V. G. Renumol, D. Janakiram and S. Jayaprakash, "Identification of cognitive processes ofeffective and ineffective students during computer programming," ACM Transactions onComputing Education (TOCE), vol. 10, (3), pp. 1-21, 2010.[3] S. Bergin and R. Reilly, "Predicting introductory programming performance: A multi-institutional multivariate study," Computer Science Education, vol. 16, (4), pp. 303-323, 2006.[4] M. Thuné and A. Eckerdal, "Analysis of Students’ learning of computer programming in acomputer laboratory context," Null
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Trina C. Kershaw, University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth; Susan Thomson Tripathy, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; Hong Liu, University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth; Kavitha Chandra, University of Massachusetts, Lowell
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
graduate education for improvingtechnical and professional skills of graduate education has demonstrated that it has potential inaddressing the project goals. For this model to be successful, several requirements are critical. Asdemonstrated above, teams are more successful when effective scaffolds are employed to supportthe co-creation process. These scaffolds need to come from supportive and engaged researchadvisors of graduate students who can work collaboratively with an agreed-upon set of goals andobjectives for their students’ success in this effort. Throughout the project, mechanisms formaintaining and exercising acquired skills need to be provided. We also believe that it isimportant to identify the specific product(s) that co-creating
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division (WIED) Technical Session 6
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Arezoo Sadrinezhad; Lalita G. Oka, California State University, Fresno; Kimberly Stillmaker, P.E., California State University, Fresno; Lizabeth L. Thompson, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Catalina Eleonora Cardenas Arriaga; Feruza Amirkulova; Maryam Nazari; Kira Abercromby; Sue Rosser, San Francisco State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering Division (WIED)
of the mentoring sessions. Two of the mentors interviewed were Deans ofEngineering and two were faculty members. During an individual 30-minute interview, each wasasked the following questions: 1. I understand that you have served as a mentor for at least one of the KIND speed Mentoring workshops. What was the topic for the mentoring session(s) that you led? 2. Approximately how many individuals participated in your session(s)? 3. May I ask you to briefly describe your impressions/experiences of the session(s)? 4. What did you think went particularly well with the session(s)? 5. Were there any aspects of the session(s) that proved particularly challenging or that you wish you had approached differently? 6. Have you
Conference Session
Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (ELOS) Technical Session 2: Manurfacturing, Simulation, Safety, and Technical Writing
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jaejong Park, Prairie View A&M University; Razaul Islam; Cullan Alexander King; Lai Jiang; Xiaobo Peng, Prairie View A&M University; Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University
Tagged Divisions
Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)
publication.AcknowledgementThe authors would like to appreciate the financial support from the National Science Foundationvia award #2107140, # 2110760 and the Department of Energy via award DENA0003987, alsothe RISE grant from the Research & Innovation at Prairie View A&M University.References[1] J. Lee, B. Bagheri, and H.-A. Kao, "A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems," Manufacturing letters, vol. 3, pp. 18-23, 2015.[2] Y. Huang, M. C. Leu, J. Mazumder, and A. Donmez, "Additive manufacturing: current state, future potential, gaps and needs, and recommendations," Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, vol. 137, no. 1, 2015.[3] B. Motyl, G. Baronio, S. Uberti, D. Speranza, and S
Conference Session
Minoritization Processes and Equity in Engineering Education
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Royce A. Francis, The George Washington University; LaKeisha McClary, The George Washington University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
Psychologist, 34(1), 118-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000005282374Bowman, P. J. (2013). A Strengths-Based Social Psychological Approach to Resiliency: Cultural Diversity, Ecological, and Life Span Issues. In S. Prince-Embury & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), (pp. 299-324). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4939-3_21Brooms, D. R., & Davis, A. R. (2017). Exploring Black Males' Community Cultural Wealth and College Aspirations. Spectrum: A Journal on Black Men, 6(1), 33-33. https://doi.org/10.2979/spectrum.6.1.02Burrell, J. O., Fleming, L., Fredericks, A. C., & Moore, I. (2015). Domestic and international student matters: The college experiences of Black males majoring in
Conference Session
Assessment-Driven Practices in ECE
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rebekah Turner, Villanova University; Jared Halsey, Villanova University; Karla Trotman, Electro Soft, Inc; Rosalind M. Wynne, Villanova University
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)
(KPIn ) we used in this effort are listed below and we developedfunctions to drive our algorithms in our custom database dashboard. 1. 100% 1st article 2. Inventory each kit 3. On-Time Delivery 4. Percentage of revenueIn equation 1, KPI1 is defined as how much time (T ) it takes to get a final working product that istested. For example, we can compute the time between dates such as physical work start (P W S)date, material procurement dates, 1st article test (1AT ) dates, and final article test dates. KP I1 = TP W S − T1AT . (1)In equation 2, KPI2 is defined as how long it takes to inventory each kit. For example, we candetermine the function by comparing timestamps
Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 1: Student Success and Mentoring
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ibukun Samuel Osunbunmi, Utah State University; Ning Fang, Utah State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
Assessment Program, 2003.[2] C. R. Pace and G. G. Stern, “An approach to the measurement of psychological characteristics of college environments,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 269–277, Oct. 1958, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0047828.[3] P. T. Terenzini and E. T. Pascarella, “Twenty Years of Research on College Students: Lessons for Future Research,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 83–92, 1991.[4] C. Kandiko Howson and F. Matos, “Student Surveys: Measuring the Relationship between Satisfaction and Engagement,” Education Sciences, vol. 11, no. 6, Art. no. 6, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11060297.[5] P. C. Wankat and F. S. Oreovicz, Teaching Engineering
Conference Session
Committee on Effective Teaching Presents: Creativity
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Shinae Jang, University of Connecticut; Christa Taylor, University of Connecticut
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)
careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter?” Gender and Education, 17(4), pp. 369–386, 2005.[2] R. Suresh, “The relationship between barrier courses and persistence in engineering.” Journal of College Student Retention, 8(2), pp. 215–39, 2006/2007.[3] T. Armstrong, Neurodiversity: A Concept Whose Time Has Come. Da Capo Press. 2010. p. 3.[4] T. Armstrong “The Myth of the Normal Brain: Embracing Neurodiversity.” AMA J Ethics.17(4): pp. 348-352, 2015. doi:10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.4.msoc1-1504.[5] C. L. Taylor, A. Esmaili Zaghi, J. C. Kaufman, S. M. Reis, and J. S. Renzulli, “Divergent thinking and academic performance of students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder characteristics in engineering
Conference Session
Energy Conversion, Conservation and Nuclear Engineering Division (ECCNE) Technical Session 3
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Anveeksh Koneru, University of Texas of the Permian Basin
Tagged Divisions
Conservation and Nuclear Engineering Division (ECCNE), Energy Conversion
form of steam by findingthe percentage of initial mass 1234 Kg/s distributed along the system by calculating the values ofmass flow rates, y1 to y8. Additionally, the students were asked to find the Carnot efficiency,thermal efficiency, and representing all the states on P-v, T-v and T-s plots.Course grading scale and assessment HW's and presentations 40% Attendance 10% Midterms 20% Final Project 15% Final Exam 15%Innovative techniquesTowards the middle of this course, local engineers from the industry were invited to give a guesttalk related to energy
Conference Session
Work-in-Progress Session: Supporting Students To, Through, and Beyond Transitions
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Janet Aderemi Omitoyin, The University of Illinois at Chicago; Renata A. Revelo, The University of Illinois, Chicago; Musab Kazi; Betul Bilgin, The University of Illinois, Chicago; Justin Merchan; Houshang Darabi, The University of Illinois, Chicago
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
Paper ID #38459Work in Progress: Engineering Identity Development after Two Years ofUndergraduate EducationJanet Aderemi Omitoyin, Janet Omitoyin is a PHD student in the Department of Curriculum and Instructions, University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC). An astute scholar, Janetˆa C™s quest for a solution to the problems of mathematics learning based on her experience as a student andDr. Renata A. Revelo, The University of Illinois, Chicago Renata Revelo is a first-generation college student, migrated from Ecuador to the United States as a teenager with her parents and sister. She is the first in her family to obtain a
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - WIPS 4: Projects
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California; Erik A. Johnson, University of Southern California
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs Division (FYP)
they encounter. Once these processesare articulated, engineers must proceed to engaging in creating the potential solutions for of theproblems that they encounter. Through this, engineers generate potential solutions to theproblem, select an optimal solution, and design and engage in a step-by step-plan(s) andassociated analysis using engineering disciplinary skills. They verify results, evaluate, and adjustthe solutions they work on accordingly, until they reach an optimal solution for their identifiedproblems.10 This is an important process for practicing engineers, however, rarely are first yearengineering students exposed to and able to practice this process. Our program addresses thisimportant practice during the first semester that
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 12
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gianina Morales, University of Pittsburgh and Universidad de Valparaiso, Chile; Rene Alejandro Noel, Universidad de Valparaiso, Chile
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
also some mismatch between the declared knowledge of atool and its described practice or the instructors’ conceptions. The future inclusion of empiricaldata from observations and artifacts will give us a broader perspective to approach these questionsand arrive at conclusions on the long-term impact of our faculty development program.References[1] R. M. Felder, “Teaching engineering in the 21st century with a 12th century teachingmodel: How bright is this?,” Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 110–113, 2006.[2] R. Graham, Achieving excellence in engineering education: the ingredients of successfulchange. London: The Royal Academy of Engineering & Massachusetts Institute of Technology,2012.[3] S. Freeman et al
Conference Session
Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY) Technical Session 12
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gabriel Van Dyke, Utah State University; Cassandra McCall, Utah State University; Maimuna Begum Kali, Florida International University; Stephen Secules, Florida International University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity
., examining the nuance in January and Srihari’s disability identities whenconsidering engineering and US cultural stigma regarding mental health disabilities). Bydeveloping a greater understanding of the ways student narratives intersect with their culturalformation as engineers, we can contribute to an engineering education culture that not onlyaccepts, but invites students to freely and simultaneously construct their personal andprofessional identities.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under AwardNumbers 2114241 and 2114242. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions, or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National
Conference Session
Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Technical Session 2: Let's Get Thinking Computationally
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Abeera P. Rehmat, Georgia Institute of Technology; Hoda Ehsan, The Hill School ; Monica E. Cardella, Florida International University
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)
analysis to analyze the interviews and video transcripts since it allows for asystematic way of seeing and processing qualitative data [38]. We followed Braun and Clarke[38]’s six-phase method for thematic analysis, which encompassed familiarizing yourself withdata, generating initial codes, searching for themes, reviewing, defining, and naming the themes,and creating the report. First, statements in the interview were coded with descriptive labelsthrough emergent coding, and these codes were categorized into themes. Constant comparison,first within each interview and then within each group (i.e., children as a group and parents as agroup), was used to continually sort the data until a robust set of themes explaining the data wasdeveloped for each
Conference Session
Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY) Technical Session 3
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rachel Figard, Arizona State University; Sabina Anne Schill, Florida International University ; Medha Dalal, Arizona State University; Adam R Carberry, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity
past chair of the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN) and a deputy editor for the Journal of Engineering Education (JEE). Prior to joining ASU he was a graduate research assistant at the Tufts’ Center for Engineering Education and Outreach. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Examining the Unique Experiences of Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Students in a Pre-College Engineering CourseIntroduction Very little research on transgender and gender nonconforming (TGNC) students inengineering has been undertaken to better understand the experiences of this underrepresentedand largely ignored population. Pawley et al. 's [1] review of published articles in
Conference Session
Manufacturing Workforce Development
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hayder Zghair, Southern Arkansas University; Rungun Nathan, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Campus
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
subscribed users to the rulewould be notified that the door was closed. Likewise, an upper bound of 50 m/s2 was applied tothe acceleration in the Y-axis to determine when the door was opened. Table 1: XDK Acceleration Data for the Door Open State Coded Variable Min Axis 2 Max Value (m/s ) Value X acc_x 18 38 Y acc_y 15 45 Z acc_z 982 1011 Table 2: XDK Acceleration Data for the Door
Collection
14th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference
Authors
Dan Burleson, University of Houston; Janice Quiroz Perez, University of Houston
is ongoing. The results will inform future implementationand program communication and seek to understand if the student experience is consistent withthe literature previously mentioned. Additionally, this will serve as the beginning of alongitudinal study to understand student career development over their entire college career. It iscritical to understand the longevity of this structure on a student’s pathway into an engineeringcareer and inform continue intervention of these skills at the first-year level.[1] B. D. Jones, M. C. Paretti, S. F. Hein, and T. W. Knott, “An Analysis of Motivation Constructs with First-Year Engineering Students: Relationships Among Expectancies, Values, Achievement, and Career Plans,” Journal of
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nolgie O. Oquendo-Colón, University of Michigan; Laura Carroll, University of Michigan; Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
success variables, college grades a (i.e., first year GPA) and creativity.Preliminary findings suggest that specific college experiences have a greater influence on first-year GPA and that students with ADHD are more likely to self-report high levels of creativity.We also plan to conduct the analysis for resilience, a less-common measure of collegiateacademic success that may be relevant for students who have ADHD.Table 2. Model components, constructs, and survey items from the HERI instrument [32], [33]. Components and constructs of our model Item(s) from the HERI instruments Precollege characteristics & experiences Gender Gender of respondent; Survey choices: Female, Male Sociodemographic
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Lisa Benson, Clemson University; Randi Sims, Clemson University; Kelsey Watts, Clemson University; Karin Jensen, University of Michigan; Evan Ko, University of Illinois, Urbana - Champaign; Gary Lichtenstein, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
had been highly rated at the time of original review. Inpart because of this and in part because it is an important part of proposal review, our reviewerswere asked to closely read the current program description and calls for proposals and evaluatethe proposals with respect to how well they matched the current call. This allowed for apotentially greater range of quality evaluations, with the understanding that there would be amismatch between the current call and the call the original proposals responded to. The callsused in this training were the Preparing Future Engineers: Research Initiation in EngineeringFormation (PRF: RIEF), Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering & Math (S-STEM),and the Faculty Early Career Development
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego; Gordon D Hoople, University of San Diego; Joel Alejandro Mejia, The University of Texas, San Antonio; Susan M Lord, University of San Diego
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
/translating-theory-on-color-blind-racism-to-an-engineering-educatio n-context-illustrations-from-the-field-of-engineering-education.[10] S. Johnston, A. Lee, and H. McGregor, “Engineering as Captive Discourse,” Society for Philosophy and Technology Quarterly Electronic Journal, vol. 1, no. 3/4, pp. 128–136, Oct. 1996, Accessed: Jul. 06, 2021. [Online].[11] M. G. Eastman, M. L. Miles, and R. Yerrick, “Exploring the White and male culture: Investigating individual perspectives of equity and privilege in engineering education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 459–480, Oct. 2019.[12] E. Rap and M. T. Oré, “Engineering Masculinities: How Higher Education Genders the Water Profession in Peru,” Eng. Stud., vol
Conference Session
Chemical Engineering Division (ChED) Technical Session 6: First-Year & Sophomore Year Curriculum
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Betul Bilgin, The University of Illinois, Chicago; Hasiya Najmin Isa; Emily Seriruk; Cody Wade Mischel
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)
chemical engineer before, and mentorvideos and interactions helped them meeting with professional chemical engineers and seeingtheir future in them.Future WorkWe had collected both qualitative and quantitative data during three semesters ofimplementation. All data was cleaned, organized, coded individually and as a group. This data iscurrently being analyzed.AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported through the National Science Foundation’s funding under a PFE: RIEFGrant No. (2024960). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the National ScienceFoundation’s views. We wish to thank survey and interview participants for their participation inthe
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
tina Cartwright, Marshall University; Julie Lynn Snyder-Yuly, Marshall University; Wook-sung Yoo, Marshall University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
; less than 28% of the total IT workforceand only 12% of engineers are female [2]. By the time students reach college, 1 in 5 young menplan on majoring in engineering or computing while only 1 in 17 young women declare the same[3]. Since 1990, the percentage of female computing professionals dropped from 35% to about24% today, and if that trend continues, the share of women in the nation’s computing workforcewill decline to 22% by 2025 according to Girls Who Code [4]. These statistics provide themotivation for a program called Project-based Work Studio (PWS) developed at a mid-sizedAppalachian primarily undergraduate university supported by an NSF S-STEM grant to build amore proportionate female workforce in computer science, engineering, and
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kristin Kelly Frady, Clemson University; Randi Sims
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
Foundation under Grant No.EEC 2144213. References[1] N. Hillman and T. Weichman, "Education deserts: The continued significance of “place” inthe twenty-first century," American Council on Education, Washington, DC, 2016.[2] M. Reyes, A. Dache-Gerbino, C. Rios-Agular, M. Gonzalez-Canche and R. Deil-Amen, "The“geography of opportunity” in community colleges: The role of the local labor market instudents’ decisions to persist and succeed," Community College Review, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 31-52, 2019.[3] F. S. Laanan and D. Jain, "Advancing a new critical framework for transfer student research:Implications for institutuional research," New Directions for Institutional Research, vol. 170, pp.9-21, 2017.[4] S. S
Conference Session
Supporting Students with Disabilities and Understanding Spatial Ability and Accessibility
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David Searle, Utah State University; Daniel Kane, Utah State University; Natalie L. Shaheen; Wade H. Goodridge, Utah State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
found a noticeable but insignificant difference in scores. All calculations wereperformed using Microsoft Excel. Table 2. Summary of results. Mean Standard Shapiro-Wilk Mann-Whitney Result Duration (s) Deviation (s) Normality U test Normal Pre-COVID 149 84 Statistically (p>0.05) U=329 significant
Conference Session
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED): Best of Works in Progress
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Casey Jane Ankeny, Northwestern University; Ken Gentry, Northwestern University; David P. O'Neill, Northwestern University; Philippa Eshun
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)
Figure 2, we found a statistically significant improvement in problem-solving masterywhen comparing the Abstract #1’s draft to the final submission (* refers to p=0.000031). Onlycompleted abstracts were included in the analysis (n=19 out of 26). The mean Hake gain for thefirst abstract is 48 +/– 7 %, suggesting that students earned almost half of the points lost on thedraft on the final abstract submission. Additionally, the quality of peer reviews scored 35 +/– 9 outof a maximum score of 48 (maximum of eight points per standard and six standards evaluated).Initial investigation of the correlation between mastery improvement and quality of peer reviewwere not significant for either the critic or the critiqued. Thematic analysis of peer review
Conference Session
Chemical Engineering Division (ChED) Technical Session 8: Lab Module Development
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Maddalena Fanelli, Michigan State University; Ryan Daniel Atkinson, Michigan State University
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)
those developed by Butterfield, Elmer,Prima, et al., involve temperature monitoring [1] or air quality and colorimetric sensing [2-6]using Arduino’s IDE programming language. Henrique et al. use Arduino boards and open-source processing software for flow, level, pH, and temperature control [7]. Their processesincorporate rigor and complexity. Hedengren et al. developed a small, portable, integratedArduino temperature control kit, allowing students to readily put to practice process controlsusing MATLAB scripts and Simulink models [8-10].Like Hedengren et al.’s kit, our system is low-cost, small and portable. It is a risk-free andsimple alternative that expands learning options, allowing easy application of Simulink or otherprogramming platforms
Conference Session
Student Teams and Teamwork
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Stephanie Claussen, San Francisco State University; Fatemeh Khalkhal; Xiaorong Zhang, San Francisco State University; Ana Karen Biviano; Yiyi Wang, San Francisco State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
Revolution to Industry 4.0: A Literature Review,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, Virtual On line, Jun. 2020, p. 35318. doi: 10.18260/1-2--35318.[4] S. R. Brunhaver, R. Korte, S. Barley, and S. Sheppard, “Bridging the Gaps between Engineering Education and Practice,” in U.S. Engineering in a Global Economy, University of Chicago Press, 2018, pp. 129–163. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226468471.001.0001.[5] K. Tonso, “Teams that work: Campus culture, engineer identity, and social interactions,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 25–37, 2006.[6] A. C. Loignon, D. J. Woehr, M. L. Loughry, and M. W. Ohland, “Elaborating on Team- Member Disagreement: Examining Patterned Dispersion in Team-Level Constructs
Conference Session
Committee on Instructional Technology Presents: Gamers
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Benjamin D. Goffin, University of Virginia; Lindsay Ivey Burden
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)
surveys in solving selected geotechnical and environmental problems,” Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 7, 2020.[3] R. Herman, “An introduction to electrical resistivity in geophysics,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 943-952, 2001.[4] J. Stanley, “Earth resistivity meter,” Electronics Today International, 1981.[5] R. Beck, “Earth resistivity meter,” Everyday with Practical Electronics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 102-105, 1997.[6] J. Becker, “Earth resistivity logger,” Everyday Practical Electronics, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 288- 295. 2003.[7] B. S. Badmus and A. O. Kilasho, “Fabrication of electrical resistivity equipment and some model studies within complex basement terrain of southwestern Nigeria,” Research Journal
Conference Session
Instrument Design and Development
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kyeonghun Jwa, Pennsylvania State University; Catherine G. P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. References[1] Council of Graduate Schools, “Ph.D. completion and attrition: Analysis of baseline data from the Ph.D. completion project,” Council of Graduate Schools, Washington, DC, USA, 2008.[2] C. Wendler et al., “The path forward: The future of graduate education in the United States,” Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2010.[3] J. M. Jones, “The dual pandemics of COVID-19 and systemic racism: Navigating our path forward,” School Psychol., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 427-431, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1037/spq0000472.[4] C. Davies, C. A. Arbeit, and M. Yamaner