focuses on the design, implementation, and evaluation of technologies, programs, and curricula to support diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM fields. Currently, through this work, she is the Backbone Director for the Alliance for Identity-Inclusive Computing Education as well as Education and Workforce Director for the Athena AI Institute. Having garnered over $40M in funding from public and private sources to support her collabo- rative research activities, Daily’s work has been featured in USA Today, Forbes, National Public Radio, and the Chicago Tribune. Daily earned her B.S. and M.S. in Electrical Engineering from the Florida Agri- cultural and Mechanical University – Florida State University College of
Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University. Her research interest focuses on interdisci- plinary students’ identity development, belongingness in engineering, and recognition.Miss Brittany Nicole Boyd, Morgan State UniversityMr. Kevrick Watkins c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Minority Serving Institutions: America's Underutilized Resource for Strengthening the STEM Workforce Report – Implications for Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs)AbstractIn 2018, the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine released a reportentitled, Minority Serving Institutions: America’s Underutilized Resource for Strengthening theSTEM Workforce. The
the City College Black Male Leadership and Mentoring Program and has taught courses in Black Studies and Chemistry at the City College. At the NYC Alliance, he oversaw the day- to-day operation of the NYC Alliance programming across the 18 participating campuses at the City University of New York for 20 years. Dr. Brathwaite began his college education at Hostos Community College, received his BS in Chemistry from the City College of New York and his Ph.D. in Organic Chem- istry from the Graduate Center of CUNY. He served as a Chancellors Fellow, and conducted additional postdoctoral training at Weill Cornell in the Division of Molecular Medicine. ©American Society for Engineering Education
-programs/dual-degree-engineering/dual-degree- engineering-requirements28. Perry, Reginald J. "An analysis of a pre-engineering program model used to predict a student's persistence to graduation." Frontiers in Education Conference, 2013 IEEE. IEEE, 2013.29. Ennis et al, “GoldShirt Transitional Program: First-Year Results and Lessons Learned on Creating Engineering Capacity and Expanding Diversity, 2011 ASEE Conference,30. Knight et al, “The Impact of Inclusive Excellence Programs on the Development of Engineering Identity among First-Year Underrepresented Students, 2013 ASEE Conference, Atlanta, GA.31. Kingma et al, “The Washington STate Academic RedShirt (STARS) in Engineering Program, 2014 ASEE Conference, Indianapolis, IN.32
Paper ID #32556Investigating Potential Gender Differences in First-Year EngineeringStudents’ Academic Motivation and Homework Submission BehaviorMiss Cara Mawson, Rowan University Cara is a graduate student pursuing her Ph.D. in Experiential Engineering Education (ExEEd) at Rowan University. Her research focuses on the relationship between gamification and motivation in undergrad- uate engineering students. Previously she earned a B.S. in Physics where she performed research in biophysics, astrophysics, and cosmology. In addition, she has taught science, computer science, and technology through Project Lead The Way at a
Paper ID #25863Participation in Small Group Engineering Design Activities at the MiddleSchool Level: An Investigation of Gender DifferencesJeanna R. Wieselmann, University of Minnesota Jeanna R. Wieselmann is a Ph.D. Candidate in Curriculum and Instruction and National Science Foun- dation Graduate Research Fellow at the University of Minnesota. Her research focuses on gender equity in STEM and maintaining elementary girls’ interest in STEM through both in-school and out-of-school experiences. She is interested in integrated STEM curriculum development and teacher professional de- velopment to support gender-equitable
(International Flavors and Fragrances) prior to his current role. He served on the executive committee of the ASEE Women in Engineering division from 2010 to present.Dr. Michael D. Johnson, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael D. Johnson is a professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product development engineer at the 3M Corporate Research Laboratory in St. Paul, Minnesota. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University and his S.M. and Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dr. Johnson’s research focuses on engineering education; design tools
engineering side. I like math. I like building stuff. I discovered later – actually, I developed a passion later…for the field, for the coursework. It wasn’t as much linear algebra and math stuff; it was taking some of that and building circuits and stuff. You know, projects – taking that stuff and using it and that was really cool. So I really got excited. (Brent)Whether interested in how things work in general, or in new gadgets and high-tech items, ormath and science, or more hands-on building, these men were distinctive in that the activitiesthey find inherently motivating and enjoyable would be best fulfilled through an engineeringcareer. For example, other professional career fields would be unlikely to provide
Engineering Through a Humanistic Lens” in Engineering Studies 2015 and ”A Game-Based Approach to Information Literacy and Engi- neering in Context” (with Laura Hanlan) in Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference 2015. A classroom game she developed with students and colleagues at WPI, ”Humanitarian Engineering Past and Present: Worcester’s Sewage Problem at the Turn of the Twentieth Century” was chosen by the Na- tional Academy of Engineering as an ”Exemplary Engineering Ethics Activity” that prepares students for ”ethical practice, research, or leadership in engineering.”Ms. Laura A. Robinson, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Lead Research & Instruction LibrarianProf. John M. Sullivan Jr, Worcester
(volume 2): a third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2005.16. Banks, J.A., Banks, C.A.M. Multicultural Education: Issues and Perspectives. Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley and Sons, 2010.17. Merolla, D.M., Serpe, R.T. STEM enrichment programs and graduate school matriculation: the role of science identity salience. Social Psychology Education 16:575-597, 2013.18. Bilimoria, D., Joy, S., Liang, X. Breaking barriers and creating inclusiveness: lessons of organizational transformation to advance women faculty in academic science and engineering. Human Resource Management, 47(3): 423-441, 2008.19. Yoder, B.L. Engineering by the numbers. Engineering College Profiles & Statistics ASEE, 2012.20. CRA-W, Career mentoring
Purdue University. He also holds a courtesy faculty appointment in the School of Engineering Education. His research focuses on assessment development and the professional formation of students.Dr. Jennifer S. Linvill, Purdue University Dr. Jennifer S. Linvill is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Technology Leadership & Innovation at Purdue University. Her research examines organizational challenges related to future work and learning, specifically within the context of workforce development. Her research portfolio focuses on workforce development through the lens of the changing nature of work and is strategically designed to address organizational challenges by providing novel solutions through an
White) peers disappeared. This has strong implications for bothfaculty and TA professional development. It also strengthens support for further research thatemphasizes both how students feel through emotional engagement as well as what they dothrough more traditional measures of engagement.IntroductionThis study investigates the role of gender, race/ethnicity, first-generation status, and internationalstudent status in engagement in engineering classrooms. We also consider the effect ofinstructional support and interactions in the relationships between demographic groups andmultiple forms of emotional engagement that students report in the engineering classroom.Demographic categories of interest were chosen based on how the existing literature
, teen pregnancy prevention/positive youth development programming, and public health eval- uation.Dr. Ann Saterbak, Duke University Ann Saterbak is Professor of the Practice in the Biomedical Department and Director of First-Year En- gineering at Duke University. Saterbak is the lead author of the textbook, Bioengineering Fundamen- tals. Saterbak’s outstanding teaching was recognized through university-wide and departmental teaching awards. In 2013, Saterbak received the ASEE Biomedical Engineering Division Theo C. Pilkington Out- standing Educator Award. For her contribution to education within biomedical engineering, she was elected Fellow in the Biomedical Engineering Society and the American Society of
2 1 Professors 2 1 1We used a purposive sample - students were selected because they either majored in engineeringor intend/intended to major in engineering and came from an underrepresented community, andprofessors were selected because they teach engineering at the college level. Once the potentialinterviewees were identified, we reached out to them via email to set up an interview by Zoom.The interviews lasted between 30 and 60 minutes and were recorded for transcription purposes.Interviewees were not paid for participation.The interview protocol was developed specifically for this project. The prompts from theprotocol that focused on assessment and identity
) are vital in offering higher education and culturally relevantlearning environments for Native American students. TCUs should seize every opportunity to introduceengineering programs and develop dual-credit engineering partnerships with local school districts. Suchprograms can significantly impact steering young Native Americans towards engineering careers.6. Conclusion6.1 Respond to Research Question / ObjectiveThe effectiveness of the Dual-Credit Engineering program was assessed through several key questions: • How do participating students gain engineering knowledge in the project?Participating students reported a sense of accomplishment, indicating that the program effectivelypromotes their self-efficacy and provides exposure to the
all social identities. Her perspective is informed by over ten years of social work experience in child protection service (CPS) and research on disparate outcomes in CPS by race. Recent scholarship has explored prejudice-reduction through intergroup dialogue. In June 2019 Dr. Rodenborg received the Lifetime Achievement Award from the National Association of Social Workers Minnesota. Her latest article is: Nancy Rodenborg & Adrienne Dessel (2019) Teaching Note—Learning About Segregation and Cultural Competence, Journal of Social Work Education, 55:4, 809-817, DOI: 10.1080/10437797.2019.1619643 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 S-STEM Lessons Learned
, the Transforming Lives Building Global Commu- nities (TLBGC) team in Ghana through EPICS, and individual engineering ethical development and team ethical climate scales as well as everyday negotiations of ethics in design through NSF funding as Co-PI. [Email: buzzanel@purdue.edu]David H. Torres, Purdue University David is a second year doctoral student in the Brian Lamb School of Communication at Purdue University pursuing a PhD in Organizational Communication with a minor in data analysis and research methodol- ogy. His research interests reside at the intersection of organizational communication, organizational ethics, social network analysis, identity and identification, and leadership development
fortrailblazing undergraduates. The CIRCUIT program involves multilevel mentoring by providing aneeded community for trailblazing graduate students as they support each other in their work withCIRCUIT and as they progress in their individual graduate journeys 42 .TA mentorship guides the students through the technical aspects of their projects, and also servesas representation that students may never ordinarily see in their undergraduate studies. It is knownthat students with a strong sense of scientific identity are more likely to persist within STEM 4 .This TA representation, in part, allows CIRCUIT fellows to build their scientific identity by seeingthemselves as scientists and engineers. TAs serve as existence proofs; showing CIRCUIT fellowsthat
Paper ID #26593Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Capstone CoursesBenjamin Goldschneider, Virginia Tech Benjamin Goldschneider is a PhD student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He holds a BS in Industrial Engineering from Purdue University. His research interests include multidisciplinary collabo- ration, engineering identity development, student motivation, and student competencies.Dr. Nicole P. Pitterson, Virginia Tech Nicole is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Prior to joining VT, Dr. Pitterson was a postdoctoral scholar at Oregon State University. She
for queer folks, women, and people of color, through empowerment, collaboration, and co-development for a more equitable world. Shannon is also a Senior Graduate Facilitator and Lab Manager with the Center for Socially Engaged Design.Dr. Erika Mosyjowski, University of Michigan Erika Mosyjowski is the Research and Faculty Engagement Manager in the Center for Socially Engaged Design within University of Michigan College of Engineering. She earned a PhD and MA in Higher Education from Michigan and a Bachelor’s in Psychology and Sociology from Case Western Reserve University.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She
structures, and the analysis of dynamic systems. More recently, He has mentored numerous midshipmen through independent research projects and has directed two Tri- dent Scholars, the Naval Academy’s flagship research program. He has published over 50 journal and conference articles on these topics. Dr. Barton is actively involved in curriculum development and program assessment. He chairs ASME Committee on Engineering Accreditation. He serves a Commissioner for Engineering Accreditation Com- mission of ABET, Inc. and was a program evaluator for 6 six years prior to joining the commission. Dr. Barton holds a professional engineering license in the State Maryland. He is a member of the Board of Education, ASME.Dr
every engineering graduate will work foran international development or other NGO.Instead, we propose that educators should strive to prepare students for a wide variety ofpersonal and professional pathways, yet with the goal of enabling them to become truly globalengineers capable of navigating ethical issues in diverse job roles and national/cultural contexts.Thus, engineering educators from the four different approaches to engineering ethics in theglobal context need more communication, collaboration, and coordination among themselves, ashow to educate a globally professional and responsible engineer is a very real and daunting issuethat has received much less attention than other topics in the field of engineering education.References 1
earning a PhD in chemical engineering from the University of Alberta. She teaches a variety of courses such as thermodynamics and senior kinetics lab and developed a new food engineering elective course for chemical engineering students that consists in applying engineering concepts in the context of food processing. Her research interests include students’ wellness, scientific history, inclusive teaching, and food engineering. She is currently piloting a new class that focus on student’s well being and success, community building, and providing academic support for chemical engineering courses. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work in Progress: Evaluating
currently teaches in Humanitarian Engineering at CSM. Greg earned his bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering with a minor in Global Poverty and Practice from UC Berkeley where he acquired a passion for using engineering to facilitate developing communities’ capacity for success. He earned his master’s degree in Structural Engineering and Risk Analysis from Stanford University. His PhD work at CU Boulder focused on how student’s connections of social responsibility and engineering change throughout college as well as how engineering service is valued in employment and supported in the workplace. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Environmental Considerations in Engineering
, explicitly describing her journey as a Black woman to and throu ghengineering. I can only assume that she felt comfortable disclosing these aspects of her journeybecause we shared identities as Black women in engineering. Similarly, I acknowledge how thereare underlying differences of Black women studying engineering at Historically Black Collegesand Universities (HBCUs) in comparison to Predominantly White Institutions (PWIs). As I havematriculated through graduate education, I’ve experienced both racialized and genderedexperiences in engineering. However, Simone’s interview was emotional and challenged me toreckon with aspects of privilege and marginalization engrained at the seams of engineering.How does your positionality impact what research
, Emily, Tawney, Jacqueline, and Weaver, Jennifer, “A Model for Student-led Development and Implementation of a Required Graduate-level Course on History, Ethics, and Identity in Aerospace Engineering,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN: ASEE, Aug. 2022. doi: https://peer.asee.org/40748.[11] D. G. Wareham, T. P. Elefsiniotis, and D. G. Elms, “Introducing ethics using structured controversies,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 651–660, 2006, doi: 10.1080/03043790600911712.[12] “We Indigenous Peoples are Rights-Holders, not Stakeholders,” Inter Press Service, Dec. 08, 2022. https://www.ipsnews.net/2022/12/indigenous-peoples-rights-holders-not-stakeholders/ (accessed May 01, 2023
encounters with the Other. (This is most obvious in her latest new course, A Global State of Mind.) Whatever the subject, her courses are grounded in accountability–to the text, to oneself, and to one’s fellows.Ms. Robyn Sandekian, University of Colorado, Boulder Robyn Sandekian is the Managing Director of the Mortenson Center in Engineering for Developing Com- munities (MCEDC) at the University of Colorado Boulder (CU Boulder). She joined the Engineering for Developing Communities Program (now known as the Mortenson Center) in spring 2004, just as the first EDC graduate track was approved. With MCEDC, her main duties have included student advising and academic program development. Recently, she co-developed the
by required coursework in both engineering and thetraditional liberal arts, this core course sequence in Engineering Studies gives students aninterdisciplinary mindset and identity as “sociotechnical engineers.”In this paper, we describe the development, evolution, and assessment of our core three-coursesequence in Engineering Studies. Degree programs like Lafayette’s AB in Engineering Studiesprovide a mechanism for achieving the interdisciplinary, sociotechnical goals articulated by theNAE [1] and others, and for broadening participation in engineering education [2-3, e.g.]. As inour previous paper on the history of this program [4], we will consider both the transferability ofour approach to other institutional contexts and its
more time for the students taking note and thinking 63 Research DevelopmentFor faculty members, staying actively involved in research is essential to remain at the forefrontof engineering advancements. Keeping abreast of the latest developments in engineering enablesnew faculty to enhance the relevance of lectures, thereby becoming a more effective educator forstudents. To navigate this process effectively, new faculty members can engage in various strategiesfor research development.3.1 Identifying Research TopicsNew faculty members should focus on defining their research interests and goals. As a startingpoint, most of the new faculty members may choose to continue their graduate studies
from Purdue University. Her research characterizes front-end design practices across the student to practitioner continuum and studies the impact of developed front-end design tools on design success.Ms. Leah Paborsky, University of Michigan Leah is a graduate from the University of Michigan with a B.S.E. in Mechanical Engineering and minor in Space Sciences and Engineering. She served as an undergraduate research assistant in the Daly Design and Engineering Education Research Group focusing on engineers’ beliefs about social aspects of engineering work. She is currently pursuing a M.S. in Aerospace Engineering Sciences at University of Colorado- Boulder.Dr. Sara L. Hoffman, University of Michigan Sara Hoffman