engineering courses that did not fitinto the categories discussed so far (Figure 1) and these were classified into the category “other.”Courses in this category include ethics, communication (written, oral, and graphical), economics,BME seminars, and professional development. These courses comprised 9 credit hours onaverage and no program required more than 20 credit hours of “other” courses. Figure 2 shows the amount of time that each university required in each of the subjectsshown in Figure 1. This graph is comprised of data only from those universities that requiredeach of the listed topics. Data were converted to a semester credit hour basis for all universities.The median number of hours for graduation at these universities was 129, with
what ways do students perceive that they benefitfrom the inverted classroom approach? Additionally, which classroom approach do studentsprefer and is there a connection to their perceived benefits?MethodsCourse DescriptionThe fall semester course used in this study focused primarily on computer-aided problem solvingusing Excel, MATLAB, and C/C++. Academic integrity, engineering ethics, data analysis, teambuilding, and the engineering design process were also covered. There was a laboratorycomponent to the course, which included exercises from a variety of engineering disciplines. Theinverted classroom model was applied to each course component. The theoretical framework forthe inverted classroom approach is based on Bloom’s taxonomy. Each
. Page 24.1228.2Layout of the Innovation CanvasThe IC (Figure 1) is arranged in four quadrants surrounding a central theme of Value. Creatingvalue is the primary objective of most design projects or ventures; therefore it takes “centerstage” on the IC. The “value proposition” is a statement that describes how something of valueis provided to customers/stakeholders (i.e. describing the need that the proposed solution is goingto meet) and is often a primary measure of success. It should be noted that the concept of valuehas a very broad meaning and includes financial, societal, cultural, environmental, sustainability,and ethical valuations. The Value component of the IC is critical for design students as it putstheir work in perspective – they
division’s newslet- ter editor. Dr. Cooper’s research interests include effective teaching, conceptual and inductive learning, integrating writing and speaking into the curriculum, and professional ethics. Page 24.1236.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 The Paperless Lab – Streamlining a Modern Unit Operations Laboratory Course to Reduce Faculty Time Commitment1. IntroductionUnit Operations (UO) laboratory courses are important, required offerings in chemicalengineering curricula due to the similarities of required laboratory tasks to those relevant inindustry
manycomplications. The students’ research projects are developed from ongoing work in thelaboratories. The research projects of the undergraduate students covered a diversity of topicsrelated to diabetes, including metabolic engineering, biomaterials, biosensors, medical imagingand tissue engineering. In addition to conducting research, students participated in weeklyseminars on topics related to diabetes (basic research, clinical treatment public health andpolicy), weekly ethics seminars, and off-campus tours of research and clinical facilities. Theseactivities were designed to expose students to the broad health implications of the disease and theimportance of research related to the treatment and potential cures for this disease and itscomplications
system, component, or process to meet desired goals (d) an ability to function on a multi-disciplinary team (e) identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) understand professional and ethical responsibility (g) communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and
, computational fluid dynamics, professional ethics, and piano technology.Dr. Donald C. Richter, Eastern Washington University DONALD C. RICHTER obtained his B. Sc. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from The Ohio State University, M.S. and Ph.D. in Engineering from the University of Arkansas. He is currently a Full Professor at Eastern Washington University. He holds a Professional Engineer certification and worked as an Engineer and Engineering Manger in industry for 20 years before teaching. His interests include engineering education, project management, robotics /automation and air pollution dispersion modeling.Prof. Martin William Weiser, Eastern Washington University Martin Weiser is an Assistant Professor in
over 24 years including eleven years on the faculty at the United States Military Academy.Dr. Kevin C Bower PE, The Citadel Dr. Kevin Bower is an Associate Professor of and Department Head of Civil and Environmental Engineer- ing at The Citadel, Charleston, South Carolina. He recently received the ASEE Environmental Engineer- ing Meritorious Service Award and he was the 2011 Harry C. Saxe teaching award recipient awarded for outstanding undergraduate engineering teaching at The Citadel. Dr. Bower’s teaching research interests are in improving active learning environments, recruiting and retaining underrepresented populations to civil engineering, and the development of classroom pedagogy to improve moral and ethical
groups have long been a key component of the university environment. Such groupsare typically composed of supervising faculty members and graduate students at the masters ordoctoral levels. The primary purpose of these groups is to support research and, to a lesserdegree, teaching activities. However, we characterize the group studied in this work as aResearch and Practice Group. This distinction is made to emphasize the fact that this group alsosupports activities that prepare students to practice engineering. In this way, the group alsoensures student success by building upon the tenets of the Relational Leadership Model5:purpose, inclusion, empowerment, ethics, and process.Further, the development of a research and practice group facilitates
scheduled to discuss the program. Although the CS program at NU had a set ofProgram Learning Outcomes, it was decided to adapt the ABET proposed students outcomeswith some revisions. A set of Program Educational Objectives was also developed by theadvisory board and was integrated into the CS program and queued for assessment. The originalCS program was not compliant with ABET Criterion for curriculum; it lacked math and sciencecomponents. It took about a year to revise the curriculum and took it through appropriateuniversity committees for approvals. The revisions consisted of development and addition of alecture and lab course in Scientific Problem Solving as well as courses in Linear Algebra,Probability and Statistics, Computer Ethics, and
, including section chair, newsletter editor, Zone IV chair, Board of Directors, and member of various national committees. She is active in the Engineering Technology & Engineering Ethics Divisions and received three Society awards: Fellow (2008), James H. McGraw Award (2010), and Frederick J. Berger Award (2013). Her research interests include engineering ethics, engineering and the Holocaust, and electronic communications media. Dyrud received a B.A. (University of the Pacific) and an M.A. and Ph.D., both from Purdue University. Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2014
desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability.”In response to ABET and for other reasons, educators have created approaches to introducesustainable engineering concepts and techniques across departments in Engineering2, inenvironmental engineering3, in civil engineering4,5,6,7,8, and to address ABET criteria2,9. In 2011,a special issue of the Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practiceprovided a collection of papers on the topic of sustainability in civil and environmentalengineering education10. And very recently implementation of sustainability has been highlightedas a means to
learning through fixed amounts of lab time in social interaction with staff and lab partners. There was not the development budget nor the inclination to use autograding as a kind of “intelligent personal tutor15,16” whereby a student works many hours being guided through programmed instruction until mastery of a skill is detected. Nevertheless, it was easy to come up with questions that would require far more time than the students thought they had for the course. In conventional instruction limiting the assigned work is also a way to avoid overloading the amount of grading effort for the staff, but with autograding this is not the case. The “retry until success” work ethic also may require more time than
where students can receive academic for a project that is uniquely provided outside 9of the normal engineering curriculum. This allows the GDTs an opportunity to address thetechnical, professional, and social aspects of global competency. To control the quality of the Page 24.82.8work done by the GDTs, the faculty advisor that heads a project creates a curriculum based onproblem-solving and design. Therefore the students receive credit for their work and are boundby the usual work ethic that is expected of a student in a normal engineering course. Faculty advisors are recruited based on their
programming optimization • Power-point slides from lectures • Four lab experiments with lab manuals • Publication in "5 de Mayo" conference ME Capstone Course I Spring • Power Point presentations on ethics on the 2013 Capstone project Linear Algebra Spring • One assignment on least-squares’ method 2013 Friday Academy Fall • Assignment for plotting PV and analysis on the 2012 - need of smoothing/shifting/storage to satisfy the
participate in the REM program. Eachsemester, the REM program began with a Research Studio lasting approximately 8 hours beforestudents began the laboratory experience. The Research Studio included an introduction of tissuetest systems and overall EFRI project goals, completion of laboratory safety training, anintroduction to research ethics, technical writing, and basic laboratory practices, participation ina team building exercise, discussion of the projects to which each student would be exposed, anddiscussion of the expectations for and of RPs. Once RPs completed the Research Studio, each RPwas paired with a graduate student mentor and the mentor’s project. After completion of theResearch Studio, each student was required to spend 3 hours on lab
introduction to engineering through a community/university collaboration in assistive technology, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Session 3253, pp. 2363-2365.48. Pritchard, M.S. and E. Tsang (2000). Service learning: A positive approach to teaching engineering ethics and social impact of technology, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Session 3630.49. Siegler, R. (1991). Piaget’s Theory on Development, In Children’s Thinking, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 21-61.50. Swan, C., T. Rachell, and K. Sakaguchi (2000). Community-based, service learning approach to teaching site remediation design, American Society for
requirements, this course emphasizes topics such as professionalism, technicalcommunication, engineering law, and ethics. Prominent guest speakers are invited from variousindustries to offer students valuable insights. Throughout the course, students are required tomake three presentations: preliminary, midpoint and final presentations.Survey methodsIn order to evaluate the effectiveness of these design projects in student learning, in the spring of2012 and 2013, two anonymous online surveys were conducted for first, second and fourth yearstudents. The survey consisted of (1) general questions pertinent to design projects in all of theaforementioned courses, (2) course-specific questions, and (3) questions related to futureimprovements of the existing
.• Professional Skills - Problem solving and managerial skills, positive attitude and motivation, business writing skills, communication skills (internal and external), foreign language proficiency (especially Spanish), respect for cultural differences, leadership and supervision skills; human resources knowledge e.g., organizational measurement), an understanding of marketplace differentiators, a mature work ethic with the goal of advancing professionally.The needs expressed by the industry leaders at the round table are reinforced through peer-reviewedjournal articles, such as those published by Akridge (2004) and Urutyan & Litzenberg (2010)[12, 13].Background Food and foodstuff is a stable industry poised for significant
Page 24.528.5well as the reduced ethical concerns regarding their isolation (compared to embryonic stem cells)made them an attractive cell reservoir for applications of tissue engineering and regenerativemedicine, including for cartilage repair 29. We selected the bone marrow- and adipose tissue-derived MSCs for several instructional and practical reasons: i) they are the best characterized ofall adult MSCs, ii) they manifest different potency for chondrogenesis 30, 31, iii) they differ intheir availability, abundance, and morbidity associated with their isolation methods 32, 33, and iv)are available commercially. This comparative analysis will provoke the students to furtherexplore why MSCs from different sources have distinct requirements
evidence to support that their program is meeting ABET outcomes A through K[25, 28-29].Engineering programs strategically locate capstone design courses within the last year ofundergraduate engineering studies, where students can apply the fundamental technicalknowledge gained in previous courses in an authentic real-world context. Several institutionshave identified Capstone Design as an ideal place for teaching professional skills, which aretypically not emphasized earlier in the curriculum [30]. Howe’s Capstone Design survey of 232engineering institutions showed that the five most common topics taught were: writtencommunication, oral communication, engineering ethics, project planning and scheduling, anddecision making. Only 48% of the survey
sophisticated engineering software package/tool for design or computation; (4)addressing engineering ethics and societal context in addition to the engineering math andscience; and (5) understanding of the "engineering roadmap" regarding engineering education(specifically addressing opportunities at Tufts University) so students could recognize theavailable pathways beyond the first semester.“Simple Robotics” is an evolution of a previous course14 taught throughout the last decade thatleverages the LEGO MINDSTORMS robotics toolset (originally RCX and more recently theNXT) as well as the LabVIEW graphical programming environment to introduce students to avariety of engineering topics: from mechanical and structural to electronics and computerengineering
programs minimally expectedoutcomes of a technological education. ABET introduced the revised outcomes for EngineeringCriteria 20001 to drive changes in engineering education practice—such as promoting more sub-stantial education in communication and ethics—but many programs’ and institutions’ ap-proaches to the ABET requirements have now become codified, and administrators now exam-ine proposed changes to curriculum or pedagogy, asking whether they pose any risk to continu-ing accreditation. Programs that have been successfully placing graduates into desirable jobsmay be similarly constrained by their own success. Such factors can reinforce an institutional
grade to advance in their studies. For those students,the bridge program successfully advanced their math education by at least a semester.From Figure 3, the results for the bridge program students in College Algebra are muchmore varied. First, it is clear that bridge program students who did not improve theiroriginal math placement tend to not get a grade of C or better in their first attempt inCollege Algebra, as over the four years only 1 of 7 students accomplished that. As such,there may be a problem with the work ethic of students who did not improve their mathplacement, or these students have fundamentally reached their mathematical abilities andcannot complete the work in Math 116 successfully. Participation in the bridge programappears
Paper ID #8790Assessing Metacognition During Problem-Solving in Two Senior ConcurrentCoursesMiss Sheila Reyes Guerrero, Universidad de las Am´ericas Puebla Sheila Reyes Guerrero is Science, Engineering, and Technology Education Ph.D. Student at Universidad de las Americas Puebla in Mexico. She teaches Databases, Networks & Telecommunications, Contem- porary Ethics, Basic computer, Internet protocols, Legal Aspects of Information Technology Information Technologies, Foundations of educational technology.. Her research interests include faculty develop- ment, outcomes assessment, and creating effective learning
) to 100 (high). The Engineer of 2020 survey asksstudents to provide self-ratings from 1 (Weak/None) to 5 (Excellent) for the following fouritems: 1) Knowledge of contexts (social, political, economic, cultural, environmental, ethical, etc.) that might affect the solution to an engineering problem; 2) Knowledge of the connections between technological solutions and their implications for the society or groups they are intended to benefit; 3) Ability to use what you know about different cultures, social values, or political systems in developing engineering solutions; and 4) Ability to recognize how different contexts can change a solution. More details about these
frequently by those respondents who had indicated multiple“extremely important” variables were: high school grade point average, math standardized testscore, comprehensive standardized test score, and the quality of the high school course load.Notably, students’ track records in calculus, physics and chemistry were ranked a bit lower thanthe overall quality of the high school course load. These variables will be used in the next phaseof our ongoing research to quantify the pool of engineering admissible students by demographicbreakdown.The math and physics high school participation rates by females and students from historicallyunderrepresented ethic and racial minority groups represent a significant barrier to equity,challenging engineering’s
multidisciplinary Capstone Design projects is also suggested.KeywordsMultidisciplinary, capstone design, senior design, electric drive control systemIntroductionLike many universities in the country, Capstone Design is a culminating course offered toundergraduate students in several disciplines at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Studentswork in teams to design, build, and test prototypes with real world applications. At the end ofeach semester students showcase their efforts at the “Capstone Design Expo”. Three of theimportant outcomes of this capstone experience involve learning about professional ethics,teamwork skills, and design methodologies1. Traditionally, at the Georgia Institute ofTechnology, Capstone Design is monodisciplinary with teams