as a Professor of Man- agement at the University of Tennessee from 1999 to 2011. He has also served as a Visiting Scientist to the Air Force Human Resource Laboratory and as a consultant to private industry. Dr. Woehr is a fellow of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP), the American Psychological Associa- tion (APA), and the Association for Psychological Science (APS). His research on managerial assessment centers, job performance measurement, work related attitudes and behavior, training development, and quantitative methods has appeared in a variety of books, journals, as papers presented at professional meetings, and as technical reports. Dr. Woehr currently serves as editor for Human
times a week. It now uses a 2+2 format: two days of lecture per week,with each lecture day followed by laboratory time to facilitate material understanding by hands-on practice. Approximately 120 students attend a one-hour lecture in an auditorium. Thefollowing day, students attend a small lab session, usually 26 students, to allow more contactwith each student while s/he practices. There has been concern voiced regarding large lectureswith respect to attendance rates, effectiveness of large lecture instruction, and connectivitybetween the instructor and students15. To provide a more flexible learning environment and improve student learningoutcomes16-18, a blended learning approach was adopted in 2010 by approximately half of theEGR115
Director of the Rockwell Automation laboratory at Texas A&M University, a state-of-the-art facility for education and research in the areas of automation, control, and automated system integration. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Design and Evaluation of Sensor Module for Portable Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) Kit for Automated Control EducationAbstractAutomated control can be found in almost every sector of the economy. Many automated controlapplications are integrated into daily life, such as traffic lights, automatic doors, elevators,coffeemakers, automated lighting, and copy machines. In all these applications, sensors are
Director of the Center for Building Energy Efficiency. She has previously taught courses such as Thermodynamics, Thermal Fluids Laboratory, and Guided Missiles Systems, as well as serving as a Senior Design Project Advisor for Mechanical Engineering Students. Her research interests include energy and thermodynamic related topics. Since 2007 she has been actively involved in recruiting and outreach for the Statler College, as part of this involvement Dr. Morris frequently makes presentations to groups of K-12 students, as well as perspective WVU students and their families. Dr. Morris was selected as a Statler College Outstanding Teacher for 2012, the WVU Honors College John R. Williams Outstanding Teacher for 2012, and
at The University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He received his Ph.D. in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1989. Dr. Woehr served on the faculty of the Psychology Department in the I/O Psychology program at Texas A&M University from 1988 to 1999 and as a Professor of Man- agement at the University of Tennessee from 1999 to 2011. He has also served as a Visiting Scientist to the Air Force Human Resource Laboratory and as a consultant to private industry. Dr. Woehr is a fellow of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP), the American Psychological Associa- tion (APA), and the Association for Psychological Science (APS). His research on
Management at The University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He received his Ph.D. in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1989. Dr. Woehr served on the faculty of the Psychology Department in the I/O Psychology program at Texas A&M University from 1988 to 1999 and as a Professor of Man- agement at the University of Tennessee from 1999 to 2011. He has also served as a Visiting Scientist to the Air Force Human Resource Laboratory and as a consultant to private industry. Dr. Woehr is a fellow of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP), the American Psychological Associa- tion (APA), and the Association for Psychological Science (APS). His research on
Paper ID #28417Reflective Faculty Peer Observation in EngineeringDr. Heather Dillon, University of Portland Dr. Heather Dillon is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Portland. She recently served as the Fulbright Canada Research Chair in STEM Education. Her research team is working on energy efficiency, renewable energy, fundamental heat transfer, and engineering education. Before joining the university, Heather Dillon worked for the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) as a senior research engineer.Valerie J Peterson, University of Portland Associate Professor of
higher education STEM courses. He is currently the co-chair of the campus’ Task Force on Innovation that examines opportunities for the enhancement of the educational experience for faculty and students across they Daytona Beach campus.Dr. Massood Towhidnejad, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach Massood Towhidnejad is Director of NextGeneration ERAU Applied Research (NEAR) laboratory, and Professor of Software Engineering in the department of Electrical, Computer, Software, and Systems En- gineering at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. His research interest includes; Software Engineering, Software Quality Assurance and Testing, Autonomous Systems, and Air Traffic Management (NextGen). In
able to like fix my fan not because they taught me that but because they really broke it down so that you could understand that a lot of things are just that you take it a step at a time. (Student 11) Page 23.719.5The majority of students said that the final project increased their confidence about tacklingfuture technical projects either on their own or through other courses. As above, many of thecomments specifically say that it is not necessarily the specific technical skill taught, but theencouragement to take the material beyond to other applications. Many of the interviewedstudents said that practical laboratory and Web
materials.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Course,Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement Program under Grant No. 0837749. Anyopinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material arethose of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.Bibliography1. I.A. Halloun and D. Hestenes, The Initial Knowledge State of College Physics Students. American Journal of Physics, 53(11): p. 6. (1985).2. S. Krause, J.C. Decker, and R.F. Griffin. Using a materials concept inventory to assess conceptual gain in introductory materials engineering courses. in Frontiers in Education. (2003).3. G.L. Gray, et al. The dynamics concept
developed new labs in the area of manufacturing engineering, including an automation laboratory in the department. His research interests include structural health monitoring, finite element modeling, machining processes, eco-machining, machine vision applications in tool wear monitoring and micro-machining processes. He has experience in hardware/software interfacing with special applications in machine vision and PLC. He is a member of the ASEE, ASME, EWB and SME. Dr. Otieno has published several articles in the areas of machine vision applications, structural health monitoring, eco-machining, modeling of machining processes and manufacturing education
respecttheir technical expertise nor challenge their capabilities and accustomed pace. The developmentof subject based online tutorials is being used to accelerate the veteran’s entry into the mathsequence and the circuits sequence. These tutorials will include videos of laboratory exercises toinsure that veterans understand the equipment and terminology used in the introductory courses.Additional online courses will be developed in the area of computer based tools includingMatlab, P-Spice, and Verilog (used in introductory course taken by all electrical engineeringstudents.) Page 25.654.3The first task is to develop the mathematics review modules
funded by the National Science Foundation, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the Arizona Board of Regents, Goddard Space Flight Center, Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the Arizona Department of Education, among others. She has a special interest in sup- porting exemplary and equitable science education for traditionally underserved populations.Dr. Steven D Hart, U.S. Military Academy LTC Steve Hart is currently assigned as the ERDC Engineering Fellow and Director of Infrastructure Studies at West Point. He has taught numerous civil engineering courses including innovative courses on Infrastructure Engineering and Critical Infrastructure Protection and has authored numerous articles and a book chapter on
the pre- course scores,average overall scores are still in the 60%, indicating that further improvement isdesirable.One approach to the repair of misconceptions is through inquiry-based activities.In these activities, the instructor creates a laboratory or simulation situationwhere students may directly observe their misconceptions fail to explain theresults while the correct concepts succeed. A set of two activities along withworksheets and explanatory materials was developed for each misconceptionarea. These were tested at over 15 institutions. Use of these activities improvesstudents’ post- course scores on the concept inventories by about an additional 10percentage points on average, a significant improvement over both the pre-testand the
facultywho are interested in incorporating educational methods and tools into their classrooms toencourage students to think more deeply about concepts central to chemical engineering. Page 25.322.3If you would like to use the AIChE Concept Warehouse, the address is http://cw.edudiv.orgAcknowledgementsThe authors gratefully acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation’s Course,Curriculum and Laboratory Improvement Program, under the grants NSF 1023099, 1022957,1022875, 1022785 “Collaborative Research: Integration of Conceptual Learning throughout theCore Chemical Engineering Curriculum.” Any opinions, findings, and conclusions
laboratory in Sacre-Coeur Hospital in Montreal, I contributed to biomechanical investigations pertaining to prosthesis advancements for the hip, shoulder, and elbow. Since 2018, I served as an engineering faculty at Chandler-Gilbert Community College. In this role, I have been delivering comprehensive instruction across a spectrum of courses including Introduction to Engineering, Engineering’s Societal Impacts, Statics, Dynamics, and Computer-Aided Design (CAD), thus fostering a dynamic learning environment for aspiring engineers.Mrs. Nichole Neal,Erika DeMartini, Chandler Gilbert Community College Erika DeMartini is an aspiring professional in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML), currently
, preparing for graduate school, and attending a professional society organization conference relatedto the topic, and visiting and presenting research to key industry stakeholders. Students also tour otherresearch laboratories at Penn State, engage in bi-weekly check-in lunches where they report out to eachother how their projects were progressing, and have a chance to network informally with other facultymentors and students involved in the REU program. Students also had the opportunity to take part inseveral informal social community-building activities, including a hike and potluck/picnic, which werewell-received and helped build community immediately at the beginning of the summer.Table 1: Example Topics and Project Titles for REU Projects
Paper ID #9454Teaching Freshman Design Using a Flipped Classroom ModelDr. Ann Saterbak, Rice University Ann Saterbak is Professor in the Practice and Associate Chair for Undergraduate Affairs in the Bioengi- neering Department at Rice University (Houston, Texas). Saterbak joined the Bioengineering Department shortly after it formed and was responsible for developing its laboratory program. Saterbak introduced problem-based learning in the School of Engineering and more recently launched a successful first-year engineering design course. Saterbak is the lead author of the textbook, Bioengineering Fundamentals.Dr. Maria Oden
Paper ID #5923Mental Models of Students and Practitioners in the Development of an Au-thentic Assessment Instrument for Traffic Signal EngineeringDr. David S Hurwitz, Oregon State University Dr. David Hurwitz is an assistant professor in the Department of Civil and Construction Engineering at Oregon State University and he serves as the point of contact for the Driving and Bicycling Research Laboratory. He is interested in the integration of user behavior in the design and operation of transporta- tion systems. He teaches classes at the graduate and undergraduate level in highway engineering, traffic operations and
, andcreates opportunities for undergraduates to pursue nanotechnology related research activities. Inthe first NanoCORE project, we focused on introducing nanoscale science and engineering intothe undergraduate curriculum through short teaching units, which we refer to as “nanomodules,”within existing courses. Students also had opportunities for more in-depth nanotechnologytraining by enrolling in technical electives and participating in undergraduate research. Theprogram has made a noteworthy impact on our undergraduate educational content andexperience.2 With the NanoCORE II project, we have extended the program by expandingstudent-learning opportunities to include additional hands-on and laboratory activities. TheNanoCORE II topic areas and
21st century of digital learning, and technology integration. Yang’s latest research focuses on employing an innovative synergis- tic approach to prevent/eliminate misconceptions from forming with first-year engineering students, and teaching STEM disciplines in online environments.Dr. Inanc Senocak, Boise State University Dr. Inanc Senocak is an associate professor with the Department of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineer- ing at Boise State University. He obtained his Ph.D. degree in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Florida in 2002. Dr. Senocak served as a postdoctoral research associate at the Los Alamos National Laboratory and Stanford University prior to joining Boise State in 2007. Dr. Senocak
. degree from the University of Florida, Gainesville, in 1974; the M.S. degree from the University of New Mexico, in 1978; and the Ph.D. degree from the University of Colorado, Boulder in 1991. Dr. DeLyser, a member of the U.S. Air Force between 1965 and 1986, held a teaching position at the United States Air Force Academy, served as a development engineer at the Air Force Weapons Laboratory at Kirtland AFB in New Mexico and was the Requirements Officer for the Nellis AFB Ranges in Nevada. Prior to 2000, his research areas included pedagogy, outcomes based assessment, the study of periodic gratings used as antennas and in antenna systems, high power microwave interactions with large complex cavities, anechoic chambers
UniversityMs. Briceland McLaughlin, Boise State University Briceland McLaughlin is an academic advisor at Boise State University. She graduated with an M.Ed. from the University of Kansas in 2011 and has worked at higher education institutions across the country over the last decade in both student affairs and academic support roles. Briceland is interested in the intersectionality of student development theory and curriculum design.Dr. Donald Plumlee P.E., Boise State University Dr. Plumlee is certified as a Professional Engineer in the state of Idaho. He has spent the last ten years es- tablishing the Ceramic MEMS laboratory at Boise State University. Dr. Plumlee is involved in numerous projects developing micro-electro
of waves. Listening to Waves (LTW) is a program designed toincrease adolescents’ interest in STEM through the science of sound and music. Based onLTW’s early experience performing STEM outreach activities in schools, LTW recognized theneed to create easily accessible tools for visualizing and manipulating sound. In particular, LTWhas been developing browser-based implementations of a signal generator, an oscilloscope, and aspectrogram. These tools, commonly used in physics and engineering laboratories, represent andanalyze data gathered through the computer microphone and sent to the speaker. LTW hasmodified them and added functionalities that allow students to deepen their engagement byplayfully creating sound and music. For example, the
engineering courses. Examples of the extremes (levels 1 and 5) were given for responders’ guidance. To what extent do learning environments in your curriculum foster sharing of ideas, exploring concepts and working collaboratively? To what extent do you feel comfortable sharing ideas, discussing beliefs, and expressing incomplete or incorrect ideas in the learning environment? How is discrimination and harassment in the classroom environment dealt with if it occurs? How are different experiences and levels of confidence with laboratory work addressed in your courses?We then asked more specifically about particular types of diversity. While University ofWashington’s PACE study (2011) included some
propertraining on these devices to draw employment opportunities back to this country. By providing astate-of-the-art learning environment, technicians and technologists can become morecompetitive within the workplace. The project will help community colleges and 2- and 4-yearuniversity-based technical programs to update curricula to meet the expectations of industry bysupplying qualified technicians and technologists who have extensive hands-on experience withcurrent design tools. By developing a curriculum that includes hands-on re-configurableelectronics laboratories, we will be able to provide students in these programs state-of-the-arttraining tools that match the expectations of industry.FPGAsFPGAs were created approximately 15 years ago by the
typicallyyields knowledge gains (Cohen d-values) of around 0.76 σ (where σ denotes the standarddeviation), comparable to those resulting from expert human tutors (0.79 σ) and superior to thoseof answer based systems (0.31 σ).1 In a previous, laboratory-based evaluation, this superioritywas confirmed with a significant effect size of 1.21 σ and strongly positive impacts on studentmotivation (0.91 σ) as well.2,3This system further emphasizes the use of worked examples that are exactly isomorphic to thetypes of problems students are required to solve in the exercises. This approach is supported bythe well-known pedagogical importance of learning from examples in the early stages of learninga new cognitive skill.4-8 Studying worked examples before (and
Paper ID #18020Highlighting and Examining the Importance of Authentic Industry Examplesin a Workforce Development Certificate ProgramDr. Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael D. Johnson is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and In- dustrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product development engineer at the 3M Corporate Research Laboratory in St. Paul, Minnesota. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University and his S.M. and Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of
Ph.D. degree from the University of California at Berkeley. He has previously held industrial positions as a Researcher at the Hitachi America Semiconductor Research Laboratory (San Jose, California), and Compiler Developer at Kuck & Associates (Champaign, Illinois). He has held a visiting research position at the US Air Force Research Laboratory (Rome, New York). He is a Fellow of the IEEE. He has been a Nokia Distinguished Lecturer (Finland) and Fulbright Specialist (Austria and Germany). He has received the NSF Career Award (USA).Andrew Elby, University of Maryland, College Park Andrew Elby’s work focuses on student and teacher epistemologies and how they couple to other cognitive machinery and help to drive
. Experimental Design and Data Collection3.1. Participants43 participants gave informed consent to take part in the study. 22 participants were engineeringstudents of various majors; the remaining 21 participants did not have formal education inengineering. 7 participants were excluded from the analyses due to technical problems duringEEG data recording, or excessive noise in the recorded data. In total, 36 participants (19engineering, 17 nonengineering) were included in the analyses.3.2. ProcedureUpon arriving to the laboratory participants were introduced to the research team, screened foreligibility criteria and asked to read the consent form and decide whether or not they agreed toparticipate in the study. Participants were next taken to the