excellence and innovation in teaching, award- winning scholarship and sponsored research, and professional service at the national, regional and local levels. Creative activities encompass both technical research on geotechnical applications in transporta- tion, and interdisciplinary study of professionalism, ethics, and trust/ trustworthiness in professional-client relationships. A licensed engineer with over 35 years experience in engineering education and practice, Dr. Lawson has provided project management and technical oversight for geotechnical, construction ma- terials, transportation, environmental, and facilities projects nationwide. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020
, social, environmental, and economic factors, 3) an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences, 4) an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts, 5) an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives, 6) an ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions, and 7) an ability to
the organization, any new structure on campus needs tobe reviewed and approved by the facilities management. The author underestimated thecomplexity of the property management structure and the rigorous review process associatedwith the process. This delay affected the construction schedule, and the project needed to bebuilt elsewhere with site access.Before the construction, the author applied to the Institutional Review Board (IRB), whichfacilitates the ethical conduct of research and oversees research involving human subjects. TheIRB commented that the involvement of students with construction tools and the risk associatedwith such activities during the construction process would jeopardize the safety of the students.The board required
-fluid systems. Emphasis is on designcalculations, component and system modeling, and optimization including economicconsiderations. Students learning outcomes related to this course include all of ABETaccreditation criteria: 3(a) through 3(k). Two of those criteria specifically address the need forsustainability. Criterion 3(c) recognizes the need to incorporate sustainability within engineeringdesign. It states that engineering programs must demonstrate that students have [1]: “an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints, such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability”In addition, Criterion 3(h) states
coachingfrom the instructor, student teams mentioned a number of ethical company principles such as: (1)honesty, (2) integrity, (3) quality, (4) safety, (5) respect, (6) loyalty, and (7) reliability, which wasencouraging to see. Financial matters were all over the place, largely made up of course, but insome cases they made a legitimate attempt to establish a realistic price point and manufacturingunit costs.To improve the learning experience for the students and overall quality of the student work, eachteam was required to meet with the instructor outside of class to discuss their progress and receivesuggestions for improvement. Additionally, after meeting with all of the teams, common problemswere noticed and some KEEN advice was given to the entire
-Lessons.html(Accessed: 15 July 2019).Kemsley, J. (2019) ‘10 years later, where are we?’, C&EN Global Enterprise. AmericanChemical SocietyWashington, DC, 97(1), pp. 16–17. doi: 10.1021/cen-09701-feature1.Mabrouk, P. A. (2001) ‘Research Skills and Ethics—A Graduate Course Empowering GraduateStudents for Productive Research Careers in Graduate School and Beyond’, Journal of ChemicalEducation, 78(12), pp. 1628–1631. doi: 10.1021/ed078p1628.National Research Council. (2014) Safe Science. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.doi: 10.17226/18706.Ollis, D. (2016) ‘Catalyzing the student-to-researcher transition initiation and professionaldevelopment for new graduate students’, Chemical Engineering Education, 50(4), pp. 221–229.Available at:https
complete lab activities in civil, chemical, electrical, mechanical, and materialsengineering. They also prepare a presentation in response to a request for proposal, learn aboutengineering finance, debate engineering ethics, take weekly quizzes, and complete acomprehensive final exam. They participate in a course that has served 4,651 students since itsinception in 2006 and 1,073 students in the last two years alone. The core project they completeis a competition to build a bridge that can support the largest mid-span load after accounting forweight and size penalties. The bridge must span 50 centimeters, weigh less than 250 grams, andhave a height less than 25 centimeters. The strongest bridges often hold more than 40 kilograms,but teams receive
describe the benefits to them.These benefits include: 1) The ability for Penn State students to work on a problem of value tothe external entity that has been “back-burnered” due to lack of time and/or manpower; 2) Anopportunity for the sponsor to observe the skill levels and work ethic of Penn State studentsengaged in engineering design, much like an internship – this can lead to better hires in thefuture; 3) The ability to build deeper connections with Penn State – capstones have led externalsponsors to begin participating in other ways in the University mission, such as advisory boards,job fairs, and the internship program.Once an external entity has agreed in principal to sponsor a capstone project, a timeline of eventsis set in motion
will certainly find the quickest and easiest waythrough or around that obstacle. It is our job as engineering educators to ensure that Homeworkis not the goal, but a means to the end of mastering the skills required for the practice ofengineering. Access to Chegg® is not good or bad, but it is real. Faculty can hold onto our oldmodels and fight access to these resources under rules of ethics or other means, or they canaccept the existence of the new tools and build better educational models for the 21st century.Chegg® may have broken the old way of homework, but it could end up pushing faculty toward abetter system.ProblemThe following analysis is based on 2011, 2012, and 2016 engineering dynamics course offerings.In 2011/12, labeled the Pre
is a PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research inter- ests are in assessment of digital engineering learning environments, evaluation of educational technology, and the ethical use of student data. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Framework for Evaluation of Large Online Graduate Level Courses for Engineers AbstractMassive open online course (MOOC) platforms have evolved from providing primarily coursesthat are free or low-cost to working with industries and universities to offer credentials, advanceddegrees and professional education. As more engineering schools and corporations developpartnerships with MOOC
- tained her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2005 and her M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford University in 2008 and 2012, respectively. Her current engineering edu- cation research interests include engineering students’ understanding of ethics and social responsibility, sociotechnical education, and assessment of engineering pedagogies.Mr. Eric Lyne American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Systematic Review of Rigorous Research in Teaching Introductory CircuitsAbstractSystematic review is a meta-analytical framework for quantitatively searching, sorting, andsynthesizing scholarly research on a particular topic
explained, We do design a survey, we refer to literature and then based on our experience with design a survey. But I must tell you that we don't have a formal commitment being taken about the ethical conduct of this that which are normally there in western systems. Such a thing is not strictly followed. We tell them orally about the participation [Emaaz].After collecting the data from the survey, the first step the faculty followed was to scan throughthe data, perform data cleaning and manipulation operations. Then, once the data was ready thestatistical analysis was done, the outputs of the tests were analyzed, and findings were documented.The faculty also said that statistical tests were decided on during early stages of research prior
from Simpson College, Iowa. In 2013, Dr. Ramanathan facilitated a co-sponsored conference on Human Rights and Sanatana Dharma: Implications for Global Citizenship. The conference was co-sponsored by Simpson College, Iowa and Karnataka Samskrit University, Bangalore, India. Dr. Ramanathan has presented several key note and plenary speeches in conferences. Most recently in January 2014, he pre- sented a plenary in a conference titled ”Bounds of Ethics.” The inaugural address in that conference was given by his holiness the Dalai Lama. Dr. Ramanathan served a three year term on NASW’s National Committee on Racial and Ethnic Diversity, and his term ended in June 2015. He has served NASW’s National Ethics Committee from
, part of the Institute of Applied Creativity and Transformation. In the Spring 2019 semester, 13 course sections were taught within the GEMnasium as a collaborative transdisciplinary effort. The courses included: Systems Engineering, Engineering Analysis, Environmental Ethics, Faith and Justice, Sustainability, Studio Practice, Human Rights, Christian Ethics and Healthcare, Social Science Integrated, Semester of Service, Introduction toSustainability, Energy and the Environment, Innovative Practice through Creative Confidence,and Freedom Enterprise. All of the courses and educators working in the space workedtogether to contribute to a 2019 Grand Challenge: “How do we grow and sustain a just andresilient community food system?” [1] The west
engineers within the workplace who mustsurvey information broadly to address problem and design tasks. Additionally, the presentationconnects information seeking and critical appraisal of sources to the ethical obligations engineershave to the people who ultimately use their designs. These components are essential to theefficacy of the intervention as they align with the curricular approach of the entire course and fitwithin the expectations students bring of the direct connection between their coursework andtheir future working lives.Stage 3: Students create final projects that must use relevant and credible sourcesAll course sections discussed in this reflection included a final project that required students todemonstrate relevant engineering
assessment of student learning.Dr. Scott Streiner, Rowan University Dr. Scott Streiner is an assistant professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department (ExEEd) at Rowan University. He received his Ph.D in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh, with a focus in engineering education. His research interests include engineering global competency, cur- ricula and assessment; pedagogical innovations through game-based and playful learning; spatial skills development and engineering ethics education. His funded research explores the nature of global com- petency development by assessing how international experiences improve the global perspectives of en- gineering students. Dr. Streiner has
likely due to the fast pace of the program, the time that isspent in the lab and in the field at forty hours per week and working with new people and their own uniquepersonalities and work ethic that may not mesh with their own. For example, some student mentor pairings have notbeen ideal. Personality clash can be a problem for some students that are more sensitive than others. So, changes inmentors have been made mid program for a couple of students. These changes did work out much better in the endbut was still a challenge to face.In order to help with the stress that arises during the program, the new workshops are being developed that will teachthe students new methods for dealing with stress. Mental and physical health components will be
are reasonably [emphasis added] protected [11].”The ABMS defines board certification as a “voluntary credential granted by an ABMS MemberBoard confirming a physician’s advanced knowledge, training, and skills in a specialty orsubspecialty that specific clinical, professional, and ethical standards are being met [emphasisadded] to provide patient care [11].” The concept of meeting standards equates to competency,and the “specific clinical, professional and ethical standards” are the recognized body ofknowledge of a medical specialty area, as defined by the profession.The standards for initial board certification are high and rigorously enforced. The ABMSspecifies that, before physicians can become board certified, they must [34]: • Finish
laboratory classes (they are blended with lecture classes). The average unit allocation for laboratory courses is 4.6 units. The majority of laboratory courses centers around the mechanics of materials and thermo-fluids laboratory courses.f) Other Core Major Classes: Courses in this category are: 1) Introduction to Engineering orMechanical Engineering (Non-CAD), 2) Engineering Economics, Professionalism, and Ethics, 3)Soft-Skill Development, and 4) Electrical Engineering Related Classes. Here are some notableobservations from the 125 mechanical engineering curriculum: Forty-six programs have an electrical engineering or related course that is customized for non-electrical engineering majors, which has become a
science from Purdue University in 1978. She joined Michigan Tech’s faculty shortly after completing her doctorate and chaired the department of computer science from 1996 to 2010. Her research interests are in software engineering, including software pro- cesses, software measurement, and software engineering education. She also has interests in ethical and social aspects of computing and has been active in efforts to increase the number of women in computing for many years. She has been a co-PI on nearly $1.5 million in grants from industry and the National Science Foundation. Dr. Ott is a 2010 recipient of the ACM SIGSOFT Retrospective Paper Award for the paper ”The Program Dependence Graph in a Software Development
professional seminar course covers topics in engineering professionalism, ethics, andleadership. The mode of class delivery primarily consists of a series of seminar lectures onvarious topics of engineering ethics and professional developments. The course is one credit andtaught by the same instructor teaching the Freshman Introduction to Engineering course. As apart of the class requirement, the senior students are expected over 7-8 weeks, to mentor, andassist freshman students in the completion of a realistic 3-D printing design project. The seniorstudents are expected to act as project mentors and provide expert technical advice and meet withgroups twice per week (one team meeting and one individual meeting with a student in therespective area of
0.875 searching Keeping a record of research activities 0.922 Using lab equipment 0.656 Making connections between classroom learning and research 0.690 Determining the next step in a research project 0.811 Working independently 0.853 Conducting research in an ethical and responsible manner 0.848 Providing leadership on projects 0.650 Finding relevant literature 0.769 Making connections
, engineering ethics, spatialvisualization, data modelling, dimensional analysis, statistics, algorithmic thinking throughflowchart, LabVIEW and Python. In the spring semester, topics of descriptive statistics andmodelling, statics, electrical circuits, mass and energy balance, and algorithmic thinking throughMATLAB and Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) were covered.Students were grouped into teams of 3-4 members, formed at the beginning of each semester.Teams were required to work on 5 design and modelling projects through the course of 2semesters. Project evaluations emphasized design process over project outcome, in line withMichael and Sweet’s definition of TBL [37]. Teams were formed to maintain diversity indemography and programming knowledge
workplace dynamics that increase the performance and sustainability of the construction workforce.Dr. Madeline Polmear, University of Florida Madeline Polmear is a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering at the University of Florida. Her research interests include workforce development and engineering ethics education.Dr. Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., University of Florida Denise R. Simmons, Ph.D., PE, LEED-AP, is an associate professor in the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering in the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering at the University of Florida. She holds a B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in civil engineering and a graduate certificate in engineering education – all from
structural mechanics and bioconstruction (with emphasis in bamboo); appropriate technology; engineering ethics; and mechanics education. He has served as PI of several NSF-sponsored research projects and is co-author of Lying by Approximation: The Truth about Finite Element Analysis. He is active in the Mechanics Division.Dr. Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #29762 Dr. Michael Prince is a professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University and co-director of the National Effective Teaching
question of whether the UMTK improveslearning and understanding as measured on pre- and post-tutorial tests of fundamental materialsproperties concepts, when compared to a similar commercial tester and a traditional tutorial. Thetrials were conducted in a first year (freshman, for our American colleagues) undergraduateengineering materials science course of 690 students enrolled across 16 tutorial sessions. Thisstudy was conducted during regularly scheduled tutorial hours and has received research ethicsboard approval via the University of Toronto Research Ethics Board.The majority of participating students were enrolled in mechanical, industrial, electrical, orcomputer engineering programs, though some were undeclared. Students were divided into
. Papadopoulos has diverse research and teaching interests in structural mechanics and bioconstruction (with emphasis in bamboo); appropriate technology; engineering ethics; and mechanics education. He has served as PI of several NSF-sponsored research projects and is co-author of Lying by Approximation: The Truth about Finite Element Analysis. He is active in the Mechanics Division.Eric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College Eric Davishahl holds an MS degree in mechanical engineering and serves as associate professor and engineering program coordinator at Whatcom Community College. His teaching and research interests include developing, implementing and assessing active learning instructional strategies and auto-graded online
include, effective workload management, networking, resumedevelopment, job hunting, study and exam preparation, mid-term assessment, team development,leadership, ethics, inquiry and resourcefulness, and future planning.MAPS has shown, based on both quantitative and qualitative measures, that by adopting aphilosophy of continuous improvement utilizing stakeholder insights and experiences, programgrowth can be achieved while improving upon measures of participant satisfaction, academic andprofessional success, and retention. Based on fall 2019 one-year retention and academicperformance statistics, underrepresented minority students who actively participated in MAPS,earned an average GPA of 3.2, and were 28% more likely to be retained in the College