gender, race, and ethnicity. Thus, efforts to quantitatively assess, andsubsequently increase, diversity in STEM fields are focused primarily on demographiccategories. Myopic focus on demographic diversity may mask homogeneity in other respectsamong the students admitted into STEM fields. For example, there is evidence that individualswho are typically attracted, selected, and retained by engineering programs tend to expresscertain personality characteristics of Introversion, Intuition, Thinking, and Judging (INTJ) asdefined by Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) [1]. As STEM-based education programs, engineering in particular, prioritize an increasedemographic diversity, student recruitment efforts pay less attention to personality and
diversifying the engineering workforce. 1 Given their diversebackgrounds, their increasing numbers, and the growing national demand for engineeringprofessionals, it is important to study the conditions under which student veterans pursueengineering education and the factors that support their success. Increasing the participation ofveterans in engineering offers the possibility of enhancing engineering’s diversity in manyneeded dimensions since, compared to civilian students, veterans are more likely to be older,first-generation college students, disabled, African American, or Latino. The post 911 GI bill hasled to increasing numbers of veterans pursing higher education. This NSF-funded project aims toaddress gaps in the literature on SVEs by
in their community.FindingsSince the program began in Fall 2013, there has been an increase in the number of studentsparticipating in at least one internship, co-op, or undergraduate research experience (see Figure1). During the Fall 2013- Spring 2014 academic year (Year 1), 33% of students participated in aninternship, co-op, or research experience. For the Fall 2016- Spring 2017 academic year (Year4), 65% of scholars participated in an internship, co-op or undergraduate research experience.The rise in industry and/or research experience provides more students with a stronger career-readiness foundation necessary to be successful upon graduation. It gives scholars valuable workexperience while allowing them to explore their career interests
well in college, have lower academic aspirations,and are less likely to progress in math and science courses than students who come from familieswith higher incomes [1]. The level of high school mathematics required to be successful incollege are courses above Algebra 2 [2]. However, students with a low socioeconomic statustypically attend high schools that are much less likely to offer mathematics courses aboveAlgebra 2 [2]. Thus, students with a low socioeconomic status are less likely to be ready tosucceed in college. College programs that intend to only admit the most talented and wellprepared students, may be inadvertently limiting diversity by not admitting students with a lowsocioeconomic status [3]. The Scholarships Advancing Mercer
students; however, the MarstonScience Library focuses on programs geared specifically towards science and engineeringstudents. To help increase participation of women in engineering, we discuss ten ways academiclibraries can assist engineering departments to increase enrollment and retention of womenengineering students. These practices have been implemented during the past two years in thelibrary programs at UF. 1. Coordinate an engineering speakers series featuring women scientists and engineers; 2. Sponsor a girls technology summer camp where women engineering students help teach middle school girls; 3. Hold a human library book event showcasing women engineering contributions; 4. Conduct technology workshops for women engineering
the pathways of students into engineering and the effects of management personalities on a product life cycle. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 A Conceptual Model for Engineering Major Choice Although initiatives and programs designed to broaden participation in academicinstitutions have generated many positive changes, the proportions of women and AfricanAmerican, Hispanic, and Native American students have not seen commensurate increases inengineering fields [1]. Focusing on diversity at the discipline level has important implicationsfor the design of effective department level programs and curricular interventions to promoteparticipation and persistence of a broad
Michigan. Table 1 shows the average high school GPAand ACT/SAT scores of admitted freshman students in the College of Engineering and ComputerScience over the past 5 years. Table 1. Five Year History of Admissions in the College of Engineering and Computer Science Composite High Number of ACT/SAT* School New Freshman Academic GPA Students Year Min. Avg. Avg. Enrolled 2017-2018 940* 1213* 3.62 423 2016-2017 16 25.9 3.58 375
Participatory Action Research (PAR) employs ethnographic methods and Critical DiscourseAnalysis (CDA) to characterize spaces in terms of their physical and linguistic artifacts. Here wereport an update on our preliminary results shared last year, including information related to ourdirect observation and participation in events held at diverse makerspaces across the U.S.Research questions explored through this project include: (1) What practices and artifacts do participants in diverse maker and hacker spaces employ to establish and maintain environments that are diverse and inclusive? (2) What does the discourse in diverse maker and hacker spaces reveal about how meaning and value are co-constructed around identity, creativity, and the
centered design, and its close cousin, user centered design (UCD) are central tosustainable development initiatives as they consider stakeholder-supplied feedback central to thedesign challenge. These methods employ an iterative approach and focus on incorporating dataabout stakeholder needs and socio-economic constraints before conceptualizing the technicalconsiderations that normally dominate engineering design thinking (Thomsen 2013). The HCDapproach begins by asking “Who are the stakeholdersof this project?” and “What do these stakeholderswant/need?” (International Development Enterprises2011:7). Design solutions are then created to bedesirable to stakeholders, technically feasible, andfinancially viable (Figure 1). HDC approaches haveproduced
distinct types of discourse: Talking Across Differences in moments of operationalplanning and Intentionally Breaching the Professional and the Personal, whereby theethnographers developed mechanisms to transgress this false binary into the very design of theethnographic research.LATTICE includes two professional development cohorts of women in academic engineeringand computer science and an anthropological investigation of the values, practices, relationshipsand philosophies of the organizers. LATTICE refers both to the programmatic interventionsaimed at advancing women leaders in academic engineering and also the team organizing them.The interventions have six characteristics that include: (1) establishing a national network andprofessional
build groups, they were not selected for anyspecific ethnic or year of study analysis in this pilot. Out of the total 40 students, 31 were female,8 were male, and 1 student chose ‘other or prefer not to answer’. The one student who chose‘other’ approached the professor prior to the build group registration for advice on registration.The student at the time of the build group registration was in gender transition, and was unsure ofwhich section to register for. Given the student self-identified as a male at the time ofregistration, the student chose to register for the co-ed section. The student decided if theyparticipate in future semesters and feel they then self-identified as female, they might choose thefemale only section in future
, and Mathematics(STEM) Ability Awareness program. This work in progress is part of a STEMGROW program [1]that is informed by a theory-to-practice model [2] and uses a funds of knowledge framework [3].The goal is to bring together students already studying STEM fields and learn more about howthey can serve as an an inspiration not only for future students with disabilities, but for all allstudents at EPCC, UTEP, in STEM-fields and beyond. Our work centers on our students’ self-efficacy development and growth pathways. Therefore, we ground our project in the Model of Co-Curricular Support (MCCS) [4], whereby it is posited that there exist four main areas in whichstudents become integrated and educationally engaged within the university. The MCCS
power. Stories, great flapping ribbons of shaped space-time, have been blowing and uncoiling around the universe since the beginning of time. And they have evolved. The weakest have died and the strongest have survived and they have grown fat on the retelling…stories, twisting and blowing through the darkness. [1]Stories have been an important part of how humans remember their past and hope for a brightfuture since long before we created written language. Telling our lived stories and listening toothers’ stories are part of how we make sense of our lives and build our communities. It is nowonder that stories hold us in such thrall and have power in our relationships and organizations.Both listening to and telling stories
that this course enabled the students to develop their authenticleadership skills, secondly, that emotions play a very important role in the process of developingauthentic leadership skills, and lastly, that specific attributes of this course fostered thedevelopment of authentic leadership skills.IntroductionTransforming our current world into a more just, more inclusive, and more compassionate worldrequires authentic leaders who know their values and act in alignment with those values.Therefore, the mission of Harvey Mudd College’s leadership program is to develop authenticleaders who have a positive impact on the world. Since Bill George [1] published his book Authentic Leadership (AL) in 2003, manyleadership experts have researched
designed to gain insight on team behavior and performance over thelife of the project. Average student scores on personality traits and competencies were comparedto see if there was a change before and after the completion of capstone design.IntroductionAerospace engineering capstone design at the Florida Institute of Technology (Florida Tech) is athree-semester course sequence that begins in spring of the junior year. In the 1-credit JuniorDesign course, students identify topics, form teams, and develop a project proposal. Two three-credit classes follow in the fall and spring of the senior year. In Senior Design 1, studentsdevelop detailed requirements, complete a Preliminary Design Review, and present their finaldesigns at a Critical Design
that were encountered. By the endof the course, the student able to read and sketch both orthographic and isometric views of parts.There was also evidence that the student created and used spatial imagery of parts that included3D aspects.Literature reviewGraphical communication is a fundamental part of engineering. Correspondingly, spatialreasoning ability is a predictor of success in engineering school. The ability to mentally rotate3D objects seems especially important [1]. Students’ abilities in these areas can be increasedthrough instruction focused on using perception and mental imagery in 3D representation [2].Effective educational strategies that develop spatial skills and contribute to student success arewell-documented [1].These
in 1982. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana in 1990 and 1999, respectively. He became the Dean of Engineering at The Citadel on 1 July 2011. Prior to his current position, he was the Department Head of Civil Engineering at The University of Texas at Tyler from Jan 2007 to June 2011 as well as served in the Corps of Engineers for over 24 years including eleven years on the faculty at the United States Military Academy. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Twenty Years of Project ExCEEd: Assessing the Impacts and Charting the FutureAbstractIn response to the clear need
operating procedures may remedysome of the deficiencies, while researchers, participants, and institutions should continue tocritically evaluate the impacts and outcomes of their work.IntroductionDrawing on research from a four-year, National Science Foundation-funded project, this paperexplores specific opportunities for and challenges of incorporating Engineers Without BordersUSA (EWB) projects into the undergraduate engineering experience. A recent National Academyof Engineering report identified challenges with incorporating ethics into undergraduateengineering education and noted the relatively persistent feeling that technical and non-technicalskills are separate, with the technical skills being more highly valued [1]. Participation in
. However, students’ exposure to intuitive reasoning, which plays a role in all decision-making, is limited during their undergraduate engineering formation. In an effort to generate abaseline for how we can operationalize intuition in the context of engineering education, thepurpose of our current research was to synthesize characterizations and portrayals of intuitivereasoning. We focused on literature from the field of management because intuition isconsidered in the context of complex, strategic decisions, which are reflective of the designdecisions central to engineering. The specific research questions addressed in this study are 1)how does extant management literature characterize intuition?, and 2) how does extantmanagement literature
macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering edu-cation can become more effective, efficient, and inclusive. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Characterizing Students’ Global Competence Development Paths Through a Global Engineering ProgramIntroductionGlobal competence is increasingly recognized as an important skill for engineering students todevelop in preparation for their entrance into the engineering workforce [1], [2]. A variety ofglobal engineering programs have been developed to achieve this goal [3], and several studieshave assessed the outcomes of such programs [1]. To date, literature on global engineeringprograms has emphasized program
, where it may be measured, has been enthusiastic and almost wholly positive.Introduction:Citizen scientist (CS) projects generally engage a large number of non-professional scientists inconducting novel research. Most often, the work conducted depends greatly on recruiting andtraining many amateur researchers to contribute to scientific tasks which would not bemanageable for a typical university research group. Such work may also be referred to as crowd-sourced science, or community science.While engaging the general public in scientific research is not a new concept, the ability toconnect and coordinate vast numbers of volunteers over the internet has facilitated a recent boomin CS work [1]. Several projects have been remarkably successful
and outreach programs, STEM teacher development, and climate change education programs.Dr. Matthew W. Roberts, Southern Utah University Dr. Roberts has been teaching structural engineering topics for 16 years. He is a professor of engineering at Southern Utah University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Civil Engineering Students’ Views on Infrastructure in the U.S.IntroductionInfrastructure is critical to society and drives the economic growth and well-being of communi-ties. In the United States, decades of underinvestment have led to a deterioration of the infra-structure and the need for extensive maintenance and renovation [1]. To meet this challenge, aneed exists to produce
Stanford has been working on designing,revising and offering an engineering course focused on who are today’s engineers, and howthose engineers consider the people they are engineering for. The course, called ExpandingEngineering Limits (EEL): Culture, Diversity and Gender, was first offered in the Fall of 2015,and in revised forms in Winter 2017 and Winter 2018. The learning objectives for students inthe course (as of the Winter 2018 offering) are the following:(1) Identify and analyze the interdependencies of diversity, culture, and engineering, using avariety of research-based sources.(2) Connect issues relating to diversity and culture to students’ experiences in college and futureworkplace experiences.(3) Envision new engineering processes
first programming course [1]. Studies have examined many possible factors,and often focusing on identifying the areas of aptitude or student characteristics that are linked toinnate programming ability [2]. The limitation of examining factors in the context of innateability, however, is that they do not adequately address the wide range of abilities and challengesrepresented in a typical first-year programming course. Additionally, the limitation to designingpedagogy with the idea that a student is either born a programmer or not leaves students withlittle control over their success or failure within a course. In contrast, pedagogical approachesthat encourage students to monitor their own learning can help the student recognize their abilityand
FPGAs in 2013 and IEEE Journal of Transactions on VLSI Systems in 2016.Ana Cristina Cadavid, California State University NorthridgeDr. Vicki A Pedone, California State University NorthridgeDr. Werner Horn,Harvey Rich c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Collaborative Interdisciplinary Research through Projects from Concept to Completion Shahnam Mirzaei1, Ph.D., Ana C. Cadavid2, Ph.D., Vicki A. Pedone3, Ph.D., Werner Horn4, Ph.D. California State University, Northridge CA 91330, USA 1 smirzaei@csun.edu, 2ana.cadavid@csun.edu, 3vicki.pedone@csun.edu, 4werner.horn@csun.edu Abstract. Retention is a major problem for engineering
response of a mass/spring/damper system to a sinusoidal input.An in-class survey revealed that the lack of interest was coming from not understanding theimportance of sinusoidal inputs. The students agreed that mass/spring/damper systems areboth practical and prevalent in the real world. However, roughly half of the students seesinusoidal inputs as no more important than any other input to a dynamic system. Thesurvey results from early in the course are shown in Figures 1-5. The first two questionssought to assess whether or not the students really were disinterested in the lecture. Questions3 & 4 asked whether or not students believed mass/spring/damper systems are important.Question 5 asks about the importance of sinusoidal inputs for system
-prescribedCybersecurityLearningContinuum. Figure1.CybersecurityLearningContinuum[1].NISTdefinestheelementsofthecontinuumaboveasfollows: • Security Awareness is explicitly required for all employees. • Cybersecurity Essentials is needed for those employees, including contractor employees, who are involved in any way with IT systems. Cybersecurity Essentials is the transitional stage between “Basic Awareness” and “Role-Based Training.” • Role-Based Training becomes focused on providing the knowledge and skills specific to an individual’s roles and responsibilities relative to Federal
individual experiences and see ifwe could find common themes. We know that using such a small sample size can mean thatgeneralizations are difficult, but we also know that these individuals have an important story totell.This paper explores their stories that were collected through an interview process. We analyzedthe transcripts for themes and have used Yosso’s Community Cultural Wealth model to describethe findings.Theoretical FoundationsThe underrepresentation of students of color, women, first-generation and low-income studentsin engineering education is often framed in a way that positions the students lacking the skillsneeded to navigate these institutions. Tara Yosso [1] created the Community Cultural WealthModel to challenge the notions of
distance engineering students are active military or veterans. This compares toabout 12% of all engineering students enrolled at UND.Cavalli has previously investigated differences between on-campus and distance students in bothgeneral material science courses [1] and composite material courses [2]. Results from thematerials science course showed a trend of distance students underestimating their knowledgecompared to performance on pre- and post-tests. Campus students tended to overestimate theirknowledge. In the composite materials course, campus student knowledge estimates were moreconsistent with their actual performance and distance students tended to overestimate theirknowledge relative to pre- and post-test performance. Neither study
from their competitors and prospective studentsenjoy increased access to information about various programs. Armed with this data, prospectivestudents can identify, apply to and enroll in the program that best supports their specific careergoals.Background Graduate programs in the U.S. play an important role in advancing their graduates’ careergoals. In the last 30 years, overall enrollment in graduate programs has continued to increase at arate higher than undergraduate degree enrollment, with individuals obtaining their master’sdegrees increasing 240% between 1985 and 2013 [1]. However, in the 10-year period ending in2013, obtaining a master’s degree became a “less popular” option for students. A strong U.S. andglobal economy provides