alignment enhanced their researchexperience in terms of efficiency, effectiveness and satisfaction of the research work.BackgroundIn 2020 approximately 4 million bachelor’s degrees were given in the US [1] across all academicdisciplines. According to the Council on Undergraduate Research, only 28% of undergradsengage in research [3]. However, within 10 years, approximately 40% of former undergraduatestudents enter graduate programs [2] where research capability and experience is often critical tosuccess. One study indicates that 29% of undergrads do not choose to participate in researchbecause they simply are not interested in research [3]. Possibly if research projects could betailored to be more attractive to undergraduate students, more students
makes, without argument,conceptual designs using paper and pencil, computer modeling, and implementation of the designsin the physical world essential elements of learning. It is not surprising that KLC has been appliedin civil engineering [3-5], mechanical engineering [5], chemical engineering [3, 4, 6], aeronauticalengineering [5], industrial engineering [7], and manufacturing engineering [3, 4, 8].This work addresses a small laboratory project. Project based learning (PBL), as a part ofexperiential learning, is also well-researched [10-12]. In addition, since students work in pairs, PLis implemented. PL methods are well described and justified in education and psychology literature[13-17]. In engineering education, PL is applied in
Paper ID #33012Work in Progress: Assessment of Automation Labs to Facilitate ContinuousImprovementMr. Bradley Lane Kicklighter, University of Southern Indiana Brad holds a BS in Electrical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology (1989) and an MS in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Purdue University (2001). His past work experience includes eleven years at Delphi (formerly Delco Electronics) as an Advanced Project Engineer, eleven years at Whirlpool Corporation as a Lead Engineer/Solution Architect, and three years at Ivy Tech Community College as an Instructor/Program Chair of Pre-Engineering. Since
Paper ID #23870Implementation of a Project-based Learning Approach to UndergraduateEducation: Case Study of Optimization Course in Industrial EngineeringDr. Behin Elahi, Purdue University, Fort Wayne Dr. Behin Elahi is an Assistant Professor in Industrial Engineering/Industrial Engineering Technology at Purdue University, Fort Wayne (Fort Wayne, Indiana). Previously, she was fixed-term instructor at Michigan State University (East Lansing, MI) teaching courses such a manufacturing plan and control, supply chain modeling and management. She got her Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Toledo (Toledo, OH) in
worked extensively in the domain of welding, specifically in the area of weld- ing technology and training. He has a deep appreciation for the importance of the welding field and plan to continue pursuing research projects that benefit the welding community.Ms. Audrey Fyock, Iowa State University Audrey Fyock is a senior in Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering and first year Master of Business Administration student at Iowa State University. This is her first year doing an undergraduate research assistantship with the IMSE Department, where she is studying the impacts of undergraduate research on retention rates and graduate school.Devna Fay Popejoy-Sheriff, Iowa State University Devna Popejoy-Sheriff is
Engineering Economist.Dr. Catherine M. Harmonosky, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Catherine M. Harmonosky is an Associate Professor in the Harold and Inge Marcus Department of Indus- trial and Manufacturing Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University. Dr. Harmonosky’s research interests are manufacturing and healthcare systems analysis, scheduling and simulation. Current and completed funded projects have been in the areas of scheduling/production control, healthcare systems analysis, and real-time simulation applications. Dr. Harmonosky received her B.S.I.E. from Penn State in 1981 and her M.S.I.E. and Ph.D. from Purdue University in 1982 and 1987, respectively.Prof. Amine Lehtihet, Pennsylvania State
learning environments in Science, Engineering and Mathematics. He has also written on effective uses of educa- tional technology in mathematics and science education as a natural outgrowth of these interests. To fund his research, Jim has garnered over $20 million in grants to study and improve mathematics education in urban schools. He just finished a $1.8 million research grant to model the longitudinal development of fractions, rational number and proportional reasoning knowledge and skills in middle school students, and is currently engaged in a project studying the sustainability of changes in urban elementary teachers’ mathematics practices. All of his work has been conducted in collaborative partnerships with
Engineering from University of Wisconsin, Madison. She is currently a lecturer in Ira. A Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Page 26.472.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Design, Implementation and Evaluation of an Online Team and Activity-Based Introduction to Engineering CourseAbstractAs the popularity of online education in engineering increases, project- and team-based classestaught in classrooms must be converted into equivalent online versions. In order to maintainequivalency, content and ABET outcomes must be considered. This is
engineering education. He was trained as a Manufacturing Process Specialist within the textile industry, which was part of an eleven- year career that spanned textile manufacturing to product development.Dr. Justin J HenriquesMr. Sancho Sequeira Page 26.509.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015Work in progress: Development and Implementation of a Cornerstone Course: Engineering Opportunities Abstract In response to the vision presented in the Engineer of 2020 Project, many engineeringeducators are redesigning courses
courses, inquiry-based learning in mechanics, and design projects to help promote adapted physical activities. Other professional interests include aviation physiology and biomechanics.Dr. Peter Schuster, California Polytechnic State University Dr. Peter Schuster is a professor in the mechanical engineering department at Cal Poly, focusing on design and stress analysis. He has a B.S. in Physics and an M.S. & Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering. After working ten years in the automotive industry, Peter thoroughly enjoys teaching undergraduates. He is interested in biomechanics, using design to improve quality of life, and diversity in engineering
history this project has beensupported by grants from our local college Foundation, the National Science Foundation, and theDepartment of Education.After sustained efforts to create a stable program based on the original concept did not providethe desired results, a comprehensive examination and redesign of the program was conducted for2013. The new version has been developed as a two year program. The first year would preparestudents for College Algebra by boosting their Math proficiency and helping them acquire astrong college student identity. The second year would introduce them to college levelEngineering.The new edition of the program was offered for the first time in 2013 with only the first yearcomponent. In 2014 we offered both
Paper ID #11784Infusing a Concurrent Engineering Model into AcademiaProf. John Wadach, Monroe Community College John Wadach is a professor and department chair of the Engineering Science and Physics Department at Monroe Community College in Rochester, NY. He has taught a variety of physics and engineering courses in his 30 year career. Wadach is most inspired by the use of design-build projects in his engineering courses. Infusing a Concurrent Engineering Model into Academia is the title of the NSF TUES grant that he and co-PIs George Fazekas and Paul Brennan were awarded $200,000. Wadach has been the co-organizer of
active member of Northeastern’s Gateway Team, a select group of teaching faculty expressly devoted to the first-year Engineering Program at NU. She also serves as a Technical Faculty Advisor for Senior Capstone Design and graduate-level Challenge Projects in Northeastern’s Gordon Engineering Leadership Program. Dr. Jaeger has been the recipient of numerous awards in engineering education for both teaching and mentoring and has been involved in several engineering educational research initiatives through ASEE and beyond.Dr. Richard Whalen, Northeastern University Dr. Richard Whalen is a Teaching Professor at Northeastern University in Boston, MA and a core member of the Engineering Gateway Team. The focus of this team
postdoctoral fellowship at The Ohio State University. She has a B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech.Dr. Catherine T. Amelink, Virginia Tech Dr. Catherine Amelink serves as the external evaluator for the TTE REU program. She has over 15 years of experience in assessment and evaluation of educational programs, project outcomes, and grant teams. Page 26.1546.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 The Impact of Summer Research Experiences on Community College Students’ Pursuit of an Advanced Degree in Science and
appointment in Bioengineering. Her research focuses on the interactions between student moti- vation and their learning experiences. Her projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their problem solving processes. Other projects in the Benson group include effects of student-centered active learning, self-regulated learning, and incor- porating engineering into secondary science and mathematics classrooms. Her education includes a B.S. in Bioengineering from the University of Vermont, and M.S. and Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Clemson University
(DAT: SR), the Mental Cutting Test(MCT), the Mental Rotations Test (MRT), the Revised Minnesota Paper Form Board Test, andthe Purdue Spatial Visualizations Test: Rotations (PSVT:R) 6-10. In studying the capacity ofengineering students for performing spatial visualization, the PSVT:R is often preferred, withone rationale being that it includes objects of complex geometries (curved surfaces, etc.) ratherthan simple structures including only cubes 11, 12. The ENGAGE Engineering project has madespatial visualization skills, as assessed by the PSVT:R, a principal focus of their efforts toenhance retention and diversity of engineering students, based on considerable work donepreviously at Michigan Technological University (MTU) 1, 2. The ENGAGE
resultof being non-traditional students. For example, most of the students do not have available time tospend in the lab performing hands-on learning, or in the library performing more in-depth study.They have difficulty finding time in their schedule to come together as a group and work ongroup projects. Basically, the students surveyed indicated that they do not take advantage offacilities and resources BCTC provides them. As a result, some students fail to pass their classes.Those who do pass do not do learn as much as they could because of limited and inefficent timespent with course material. Thus, finacial barriers decrease retention and lowers the quality ofeducation a student receives
what skills those in-demand jobsrequire; and (3) Hard-working Americans, whether studying, looking for work, or wanting bettercareer paths, often aren’t sure what education to pursue and whether jobs will be waiting whenthey finish.1 The Center for Aviation and Automotive Technology Education using Virtual E-Schools (CA2VES) is an innovative regional center aiming to address these three majorproblems, and many additional challenges that have plagued workforce development projects. The Center for Aviation and Automotive Technology Education using Virtual E-Schools 2(CA VES), located at Clemson University in South Carolina, serves as a state, regional, andnational resource for 2-year college e-learning research, professional
interest is in the cultural and religious perspectives in the ethics of emerging biotechnologies for which she was awarded a Fulbright grant to conduct research at the United Arab Emi- rates University. She is the Special Projects Manager in the School of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems at Drexel University, and Director of the local and international weServe Program, currently established in the Gambia and Mozambique, (Africa), for which the weServe program recently received a student leadership award from the Jenzabar Foundation. She is a summa cum laude graduate from Thomas Jefferson University with a B.S. in diagnostic imaging. She has presented at MESA, the International Conference on Islam and
professional or “soft” skills emphasized by accrediting agencies 13, and hence,greater persistence and success. In engineering settings, service learning provides experientiallearning to help students appreciate the non-engineering related aspects to problem solving,develop practical skills, and illuminate the link between engineering and the amelioration ofsocietal issues and problems. The application of engineering skills to community serviceprojects distinguishes service learning from the typical internships, co-ops and fellowships thatstudents frequently seek. In these experiences, students would likely work on projects ofcommercial importance to the sponsoring agency. Service learning may be integrated into the
AC 2010-1273: USING TECHNOLOGY-MEDIATED COLLABORATION IN THETEACHING OF ETHICS & GLOBALIZATIONGary Chinn, Pennsylvania State University Gary Chinn is project manager of the eLearning Initiative in the College of Engineering at Penn State. Sponsored by the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education, the initiative explores new technologies and approaches related to teaching & learning.Veena Raman, Pennsylvania State University Veena Raman is a lecturer in the departments of Communication Arts and Sciences and Science, Technology, and Society at Penn State. Dr. Raman teaches courses on globalization, new information technologies, the cultural implications of new media
AC 2012-4073: BUILDING A COMPREHENSIVE SOLUTION TO OBTAINAND SUSTAIN STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES FOR A COLLABO-RATED LABMr. Fanyu F. Zeng, Indiana Wesleyan University Fanyu F. Zeng is an Assistant Professor in business information systems at Indiana Wesleyan Univer- sity. His research interests include software development, programming, database management, database performance, data mining, software project management, teaching methods, and international cultures in high education. Page 25.275.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Building a Comprehensive
Purchasing Manager with the Institute of Supply Management (formerly NAPM).Ms. Lynda M. Coulson, Rolls-Royce Corporation Page 25.1327.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The Process and Delivery of a Directed Project Component: Lessons and Methods from a Collaborative Degree ProgramA Directed Project requirement is becoming more common in today’s Masters Degree Programs.Both academia and industry can derive value in requiring an in-depth study that can benefit thecompany’s bottom line while fulfilling curriculum and learning outcomes. With a DirectedProject experience, students
prefer flexible schedules on any training needs.Second, effective use of media such as video clips, narrative presentation, web resources, etc. isthe most practical way of delivering training that focuses on practice and application.Part # Topics Activities 1 Introduction to TBL and Limitations of Traditional Quiz 1 Learning 2 Active Learning Quiz 2 3 Group-based Active Learning Quiz 3 4 Team-based Learning Quiz 4 5 Practical Recommendations and Suggestions Quiz 5 Final Project: Write
member at the Engineering Leadership Institute at the University of Texas, Austin, and is the 2012 IEEE-USA Congressional Fellow. Page 25.1472.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 What do Engineering leaders want? Page 25.1472.2 Engineering and scientific leaders have traditionally moved into supervisory positionsbased on their exceptional technical skills, but have received little or no management training.Generally speaking, engineers prefer to approach the administration of projects by defining fixedparameters and
concept will be needed, what design requirements are being evaluated by eachmodel, will subsystems be prototyped separately, and will digital or physical prototypes be used(or both). Our previous research indicates that engineering design teams often follow the sameprototyping strategy used in their previous design efforts. However, research also shows that thisis not always the best decision. Careful consideration of the prototyping strategy, based on specificcharacteristics of a design project, can lead to significant benefits for the outcome of the design.This current work provides a method for informing the engineering design team regardingdecisions on when to use digital and/or physical prototypes. Physical prototyping, in this context