, Curriculum and Laboratory Improvement -Educational Materials Development Program, under the administration of Dr. Roger E. Salters.Bibliography1. Pomeranz, S. B., “Using CAS in a Graduate Numerical Methods Course”, Session 1265, 1996.2. Cheng, F., and D. Chen, “Incorporating Robotic Simulation Technology into the Undergraduate Curriculum ofRobotics and Industrial Automation”, Session 1463, 1999.3. Das, D. K., “Introduction of System Simulation Techniques into the Mechanical Engineering TechnologyPrograms”, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Session 3147, 1999.4. Wankat, P. C., “Integrating the Use of Commercial Simulators into Lecture Courses”, Journal of EngineeringEducation, January 20025. Young, J. H. and W. C. Lasher, “Use of Computational
, Curriculum and Laboratory Improvement -Educational Materials Development Program, under the administration of Dr. Roger E. Salters.Bibliography1. Pomeranz, S. B., “Using CAS in a Graduate Numerical Methods Course”, Session 1265, 1996.2. Cheng, F., and D. Chen, “Incorporating Robotic Simulation Technology into the Undergraduate Curriculum ofRobotics and Industrial Automation”, Session 1463, 1999.3. Das, D. K., “Introduction of System Simulation Techniques into the Mechanical Engineering TechnologyPrograms”, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Session 3147, 1999.4. Wankat, P. C., “Integrating the Use of Commercial Simulators into Lecture Courses”, Journal of EngineeringEducation, January 20025. Young, J. H. and W. C. Lasher, “Use of Computational
; Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationPartial funding for this project was provided by the National Science Foundation through theGateway Engineering Education Coalition.Bibliography1. Wallace, C. S. “A Suggestion for a Fast Multiplier,” IEEE Transactions on Electronic Computing, vol. EC-13, no. 2, Feb. 1964, pp. 14-17.2. Carpinelli, John D. Computer Systems Organization and Architecture. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley (2001).3. Carpinelli, John D. “The Relatively Simple CPU Simulator,” ASEE Computers in Education Journal, April-June 2002, pp. 20-26.4. Carpinelli, John D. “The Very Simple CPU Simulator,” Proceedings of the IEEE/ASEE 2002 Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston, MA, November
ideas q Verify benefits q Update database q Receive CertificationI. IntroductionThe Six Sigma Methodology was developed at Motorola during the mid-1980’s as a newapproach to Quality Assurance. While quality programs like TQM (Total Quality Management)or Kaizen a continuous improvement methodology were using similar tools (i.e. CapabilityStudies, Pareto Analysis, Designed Experiments) to improve quality, many companies found thatthey did not succeed. Where Six Sigma differs substantially from other programs is [1]: q In-depth training in statistical analysis over a three-month period in conjunction with a training project for each student. q Easy “point and click” software (Minitab) for statistical analysis available
., Professor of Chemistry, has been on Kettering University’s faculty since 1982.He earned both his B. S. and his Ph. D. from North Dakota State University in Fargo. He has published inthe areas of chemical by-products of laser cutting of plastics and in laser surface treatment for adhesivebonding. In 2002 he was named Outstanding Teacher by the Kettering Alumni Association. Page 8.619.5“Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”
, 2002, http://insys.ed.psu.edu/~pt3/hsmath/Learning_theories.html 2. Gale Encylopedia of Psychology, Inductive Reasoning, Accessed December 9, 2002, http://findarticles.com/cf_dls/g2699/0005/2699000507/p1/article.jhtml 3. Hesketh, R.P, Farrell, S. and Slater, C.S., The Role of Experiments in Inductive Learning, Proceedings of the 2002 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education , Session 3613. 4. McCabe, W.L, Smith, J.C. and Harriott, P., Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering, 6th Edition, McGraw Hill, pg 848-849 (2001). 5. AgResearch Wallaceville Educational Outreach, Traditional Biotechnology – Cheese, Accessed November 4, 2002, http
most terrorism. They have used violenceand fear to increase their power. They have used violence and fear to maintain theirauthority and to eliminate their opposition.During the 1930’s, for example, the dictators Adolph Hitler of Germany, Benito Mussolini1 Terrorism in general is difficult to define. According to the State Department’s annual publicationPatterns of Global Terrorism, “No one definition of terrorism has gained universal acceptance.” The StateDepartment uses the definition contained in Title 22 of the United States Code, Section 2656f (d): “Theterm terrorism means premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatanttargets by sub national groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an
deliver such instruction.The Case Files project includes extensive professional development opportunities for thosecommunity college faculty members across the nation who are committed to learning the problembased case study method of curriculum design and instruction. Awareness workshops are offeredto as an orientation to the basic philosophy and framework of the process. Authoring Workshopsalong with on-site coaching further equip faculty to design, use, and publish cases that areproblem based and student centered.Reference1 Barrows, H. S. (1999b). Short Paper for a SEATEC Case Study Forum on “Strategies forUsing Case Studies in Teaching and Learning.” http://www.nsti.tec.tn.us/seatec/pages_resourcesBiographiesJames Johnson is Dean of Business
focus on a subset of specified skills.In general, performance measures or rubrics could be designed using the development methodologyto aid in the standardization of ABET-type assessment materials across a department, college, oruniversity. The development methodology encourages the use of a broad base of expertise to makethe outcomes widely applicable rather than discipline specific. The methodology can be used togenerate or stimulate discussion during faculty training regarding assessment activities in general,or as applied to a specific course. It can assist new faculty or those new to assessment orevaluation activities by providing structured guidance, for either broad or specific applications.ReferencesParker, P.E., P.D. Fleming, S
performing a wait on your // semaphore and then generate a random number // and send it to the parent along with your ID for (i=0; i #include #include #include #include #include #include "/home/cs/dadfar/cs327/lab4/clientServer.h" int connectToHost(int socketNO, char * serverMachineName, int serverPortNO); int connect(int s, struct sockaddr *name, int namelen); int socketNO, n, bufferSize = 1024; int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { char FromServer[bufferSize]; // check for the number of arguments and quit if it is not equal to 4 if (argc != 4) { cout << "Usage: programname host 79 username" << endl; exit(1); } if ((socketNO = socket(AF_INET,SOCK_STREAM,0)) <
Session 1531 Balancing Rigor and Rapport in the Engineering Classroom: Where Should the Line Be Drawn by New Engineering Educators? Robert D. Engelken, Ph.D., P.E. Director of Electrical, Computer, and Information Engineering Professor of Electrical Engineering Arkansas State University P.O. Box 1740 State University (Jonesboro), AR 72467 bdengens@astate.eduI. Introduction and BackgroundNew engineering educator(s) (NEE) enter
Predict ed via 29 Student S urvey 30 25 26 21 19 20 8 10 4 5 0 0 Top High Middle Low NegativeFigure 7: Actual versus Prediction of Student RankingThe Future:Further study of the methods described in this paper will continue into the future. Several topicsare of particular interest. One of the troubling survey results was that 51% of students respondingto the survey felt
. Section three covers the objectives that were considered prior to thesoftware design and implementation. The processes of the actual software system design,including related considerations are covered in section four. In section five the semi-immersiveVR implementation of the application is discussed, and finally in section six the empiricalprocedures and resulting analysis is detailed.2. BackgroundIn this section, specific technologies related to engineering education are discussed. Thisdiscussion includes the use of multimedia tools as well as simulations and accompanyingvisualization. The benefits associated with three-dimensional simulation and visualization inengineering are also touched upon as well as any related issues.In the early 1950's
Session 3547 Transparent Anatomical Mannequin Upgrade Elaine M. Cooney, Kenneth Reid Purdue School of Engineering and Technology Indiana University Purdue University IndianapolisIntroductionThe Ruth Lily Health Education Center has had TAM1 (Transparent Anatomical Mannequin)since the mid-1980’s. She is a life size model of an adult female with clear plastic “skin” andorgans that light up. She is used to teach pre-school, elementary and middle school childrenabout health and fitness. For instance, each year hundreds of fifth graders come to the
Edition, 2003. 4. Chapman, Brian. Glow Discharge Processes: Sputtering and Plasma Etching, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1980. 5. Roth, J. Reece. Industrial Plasma Engineering: Volume 1, Principles, IOP Publishing Ltd., 1995. 6. Miller, Gary M. Modern Electronic Communication, Sixth Edition, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1999 7. Tomasi, Wayne. Electronic Communication Systems, Third Edition, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1998. 8. Quirk, Michael and Serda, Julian. Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 2001. 9. Wolf, S and Tauber, R. N. Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era: Volume 1 – Process Technology, Second Edition, Lattice Press, 2000. 10. MFJ HF/VHF SWR Analyzer Instruction Manual, MFJ
benefits ofencouraging metacognitive skills within a module.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under grant EEC-0230700.Bibliography[1] Berardi-Coletta, B., Dominowski, R. L., Buyer, L. S., & Rellinger, E. R. (1995). Metacognition and problem solving: A process-oriented approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 205-223.[2] Borkowski, J. G., Carr, M., Rellinger, E., & Pressley, M. (1990). Self-regulated cognition: Interdependence of metacognition, attributions, and self-esteem. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.[3] Borkowski, J. G., &
effective. Although it is not known towhat degree they enhance learning, student comments on end of course evaluations indicate thatstudents enjoy the demonstrations. End of course assessment shows that they have learned theconcepts illustrated in the demonstrations.AcknowledgmentsThe support of the National Science Foundation through the CCLI Program Grants Nos.9980982 and 0196464 is gratefully acknowledged.Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliographic Information1. Palmer M. A., Pearson R. E., Wynne K. J.: Applied Materials Science - A Fundamental Course for Engineers; ASEE 2002
material that identifies the text.2. TEXT PREFACE - A written paragraph or video clip of the author introducing the text and course material.3. ANTICIPATED AUDIENCE – This determines the level of the text and to whom the text is written.4. ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S) – This page should include pictures of the author(s) and a brief outline of the author(s) experience, credentials, and interests. A short video clip of the author(s) introducing themselves is appropriate.5. DEDICATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS – Everyone who inspired and contributed to the author's effort.6. SUGGESTED STUDY GUIDES AND SYLLIBI – Give the scholar a guided path of study with suggested reading and exercises
theenrollment trends of MTSU engineering technology programs. The EMET program had a 60%enrollment rising in the last four years. Its sister program, Computer Engineering Technology, hada 43% enrollment rising during the same period. Engineering Technology Enrollm ent Trends 90 80 Computer 70 Electromecha nical 60 50 40 30 Ma nufacturing 20 10 Data c ompiled from MTSU yearly focu s report
able to recognize basic beliefs and assumptions – probably unconscious Unconsciously held Basic - rarely discussed – Assumption but recognisable s Figure 2 Learning the CultureArtefacts, Practices and Behaviors were influenced and modeled primarily by staff who were themajor transmitters of the academic side of the culture. Senior students also had a role to play in
modeler” for the US Air Force. After one year of building visualdatabases for flight simulators, Pat began software development for the flight simulator andcontinued taking computer classes. After 6 months as a subcontractor, she began to work directlyfor the US Air Force. In the mid-1980’s Pat’s supervisor moved from the US Air Force to aprivate aerospace company that was competing for the US Army LHX helicopter. The LHX wasa R&D project sponsored by the US Army to develop a reconnaissance and attack helicoptercapable of flying at high speeds. After losing the LHX bid in 1991, Pat’s company had to layoff Page 8.284.5
Conference Proceedings, Session2578, pp. 2220-2224, (1988).4 David Parent, Yasser Dessouky, Stacy Gleixner, Gregory Young and Emily Allen, “The MicroelectronicsProcess Engineering Program at SJSU,” Proceedings of the 14th Biennial IEEEUniversity/Government/Industry Microelectronics Symposium,” Richmond, VA, pp. 128-134, (June 2001).5 J. A. Lee, D. M. Castella, and S. G. Middleton, “Faculty Perceptions of Academe’s Evaluation System”,Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 263-267, (July 1997).6 D. N. Nielsen, “A Deming Approach to Promotion and Tenure”, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings,Session 2275, pp. 1022-1027, (1993).7 M. A. Massengale, “The Case For Tenure: Where Does The Burden Rest?”, ASEE Annual ConferenceProceedings, Session 2575, pp
students and the instructor with great opportunities to grow. Ituncovers inappropriate attitudes, frees from impulsive thinking, and improves relationships. As aresult, the effectiveness of the learning process improves. Students are better prepared for copingwith problems they will encounter after graduation.Bibliography1. Beder, S., Valuable skills learned from "basket-weaving", Engineers Australia, March 2000, p. 46, available at http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/sbeder/columns/probe3.html.2. Built in America: Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record, 1933-Present, The library of Congress, see http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/ndlpedu/collections/built/thinking.html.3. Gunnink, B. and. Sanford Bernhardt, K.L
, American Society for Engineering EducationBibliography 1. Haque, M.E. "Web-based Visualization Techniques for Structural Design Education" American Society for Engineering Education, 2001 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Section 2793 Multimedia, Albuquerque, NM, (2001). 2. Haque M.E., Vamadevan A., Duraimurugar S., and Gandlur Y. Java and VRML based Interactive Reinforced Concrete Design Course Studio. American Society for Engineering Education, ASEE 2000 Annual Conference Proceeding, Section 1315 Use of Computer Technology to Enhance CE Education, St. Louis, MO, (2000). 3. Haque, M.E. "3-D Visualization and Animation Techniques in Structural Design Education," the International Conference on
Disabled,” Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, session #2625. 10. Carlson, L.E., et. al., “First Year Engineering Projects: An Interdisciplinary, Hands-on Introduction to Engineering, Proceedings of the 2000 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 2039-2043. 11. “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs,” Engineering Accreditation Commission, ABET, 2002, http://www.abet.org. 12. ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Effective for Evaluations During the 2001-2002 Accreditation Cycle,” http://www.abet.org. 13. Moor, S. S., and Drake, B., “Addressing Common Problems in Engineering Design Projects: A Project Management Approach
in the design, fabrication, and refinement of these experiments.References1. Hargrove, J. B., "Curriculum, Equipment and Student Project Outcomes for Mechatronics Education in the Core Mechanical Engineering Program at Kettering University", Mechatronics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 343-356, February 2002.2. Hsu, T., "Undergraduate Curriculum Development in Mechatronic Systems Engineering", proceedings of the ABET Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, pp. 140-147, 1996.3. Auslander, D., "What is Mechatronics", IEEE Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 1, no. 1, 1996.4. Ume, I. C., Kita, A., Liu, S., and Skinner, S., "Graduate Mechatronics Course in the School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Tech", Mechatronics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 323-335
-Frontiers in Education Conference, 3, 1999, p 13b1-1 - 13b1-6., 29th Annual Frontiers inEducation Conference: 'Designing the Future of Science and Engineering Education', Nov 10-Nov13 1999, San Juan, Puerto Rico, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., USA.36. Seville, Jonathan , Teaching chemical product engineering, Chemical Engineer(London), 709, Sep, 2000, p 18-19, Institute of Chemical Engineers.37. Smith, R.P.(Univ. of Washington) Teaching design for assembly using product disassembly,IEEE Transactions on Education, 41, 1, Feb, 1998, p 50-53.38. Srinivasan, V. (Graduate School of Business, Stanford University); Lovejoy, William S., Perspective:Ten years of experience teaching a multi-disciplinary product development course
offer? Evaluate an offer offer? NO Negotiate Negotiate Respond to school’s “no” Respond to school ’s “no” YES Want Want NO Respond positively to a school’s “yes” the Respond
Completenes s Orginality Cre ativity IndeciesFigure 1. Average of Creativity Indices for Civil Engineering Students. Interior Des ign Cre ativity Ass es sm ent 140 120 100 Creativity Scores 80 Int Des Control Int Des Tr eatment 60 40 20
engineering. (pp. 147-159).10. Molad, C. B. (2000). Women weaving webs: Will women rule the internet? Houston, TX: CBM Press.11. Astin, H. S., & Sax, L.J. (1996). Developing scientific talent in undergraduate women. In Davis, C. et al. (Eds.), The equity equation: Fostering the advancement of women in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering. (pp. 96-121). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.12. Vetter, B. M. (1996). Myths and realities of women’s progress in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering. In Davis,C. et al. (Eds.), The equity equation: Fostering the advancement of women in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering. (pp. 29-56). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.13. Hanson, S. L. (1997). Lost talent: Women