Engineering: Perspectives of Engineering Faculty (Work in Progress)IntroductionDespite a growing emphasis on engineering in grades K-12, persistently high dropout ratesplague undergraduate engineering programs [1],[2]. Prior studies indicate that engineeringactivities have the potential to increase interest in engineering pathways [3] or develop anengineering identity [4]. Less clear is whether pre-college engineering instruction alsocontributes to students' success in engineering career pathways by adequately preparing studentsfor undergraduate engineering. One concern is that K-12 engineering lessons "may mislead orunder prepare [students] by providing activities that they enjoy but which have little relation toengineering
. In his study of 10 toppublic institutions, it was found that institutions overwhelmingly focus on compositionaldiversity of engineering programs at the expense of positive racial climates. This approachsimplifies the experiences and development of traditionally marginalized groups in STEM downto enrollment and graduation rates and ignores the quality of climate. This focus does little toaddress the systemic racism present within engineering spaces, essentially putting a band-aidover a broken bone. When DEI evaluations in STEM environments do go beyond quantitativemeasures of diversity, student outcomes are often used as proxy measures of programperformance [4]. So there is a need for evaluation tools that measure experiences and
media forums to elicit narratives of graduate engineering student attrition. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(1), 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20299Berdanier, C. G., & Zerbe, E. (2018). Quantitative Investigation of Engineering Graduate Student Conceptions and Processes of Academic Writing. 2018 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm), 138–145.Council of Graduate Schools. (2007). Ph.D. Completion and Attrition: Analysis of Baseline Program Data from the Ph.D. Completion Project.Cruz, J. M., Artiles, M. S., Lee-Tomas, G., Matusovich, H. M., & Adams, S. G. (2018). The Dissertation Institute: Evaluation of a Doctoral Student Writing Workshop. 2018 IEEE
2017 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference Impact of Entrepreneurial Mindset Integration in a First- Semester Engineering Course Benjamin S. Kelley Baylor University School of Engineering and Computer ScienceAbstractDuring the fall semester offering of EGR 1301: Introduction to Engineering, EntrepreneurialMindset (EM) topics were introduced as class topics on three separate occasions in two differentcourse sections. To measure if exposure to and practice of the specific EM topic of Create Valueimpacted student EM awareness two different self-assessment instruments were administered tothese and several other EGR
results in a written report in the form of an engineering memorandum to a fictitious client.As part of a larger study on models and modeling, one of our objectives was to assess theeffectiveness of MEAs across various dimensions including improving conceptual learning andproblem solving abilities2,4,5. We have implemented and assessed MEAs in the classroom tostudy students’ problem solving, modeling and teamwork processes. When assessing theeffectiveness of MEAs in improving conceptual learning and problem solving we have usedthree assessment methods: pre and post concept inventories (CIs) to assess learning gain, anonline reflection tool to assess the problem solving process, and a rubric to assess the resultinggeneral model and specific
, Virginia Tech Dr. Amelink is Director of Graduate Programs and Assessment in the College of Engineering, Virginia Tech. She is also an affiliate faculty member in the Departments of Engineering Education and Educa- tional Leadership and Policy Studies at Virginia Tech. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 A Multi-Program Approach to Student Retention and SuccessAbstractPrograms that address the needs of first year engineering students have traditionally beendesigned to create community and facilitate inclusion. Students are more likely to be retainedinto their second year when guided by structures of engagement and support throughpurposefully-designed programs (Soldner, Rowan-Keyon
Competency Exam to be administeredduring the senior year. One of the observed benefits of the exam is its role in focusing theattention of both students and faculty members on the core elements of our program. Theexam also provides a quality check for graduating students, and feedback for programimprovement. Our experience to date indicates that the Core Competency Exam, alongwith other elements of our assessment plan, will have a significant positive impact on theeducation of our students.IntroductionAs part of our assessment plan, the Chemical Engineering Department faculty at BrighamYoung University have defined a set of core competencies that we have designated formastery by all of our graduating students1. The intent of these core competencies
engineering and technology education teachers to help create anunderstanding of what the overarching goals of the study were and their role providingresearchers with access to the school facilities and students. Once the teacher was familiar withthe study, a member of the research team made classroom visits to begin the recruitment process.The researcher explained the purpose of the study and the student’s role within the study.The target student for the pilot study was one who had completed several engineering basedcourses at the high school level. Senior students were targeted for the pilot study because theywere most likely to demonstrate design thinking after having studied multiple courses, thusallowing researchers to pilot the methodology. The
of Doctoral Studies, 8(2103), 151-172. http://ijds.org/Volume8/IJDSv8p151-172Lundy- Wagner0381.pdfMayat, N., & Amosun, S. L. (2011). Perceptions of academic staff towards accommodating students with disabilities in a civil engineering undergraduate program in a university in South Africa. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24(1), 53-59.McCall, C., Shew, A., Simmons, D. R., Paretti, M. C., & McNair, L. D. (2020b). Exploring student disability and professional identity: Navigating sociocultural expectations in U.S. undergraduate civil engineering programs. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 25(1), 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2020.1720434McLoughlin, L. A. (2005
incorporating intersectionality into quantitative methodological approaches,” Review of Research in Education, vol. 42, no.1, pp. 72–92, 2018.[23] L. A. Clark and D. Watson, “Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development,” Psychological Assessment, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 309–319, 1995.[24] A. L. Griffith, “Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: Is it the school that matters?” Economics of Education Review, vol. 29, no. 6, 2010. pp. 911–922, 2010.[25] B. D. Jones, M. C. Paretti, S. F. Hein, and T. W. Knott, “An analysis of motivation constructs with first-year engineering students: Relationships among expectancies, values, achievement, and career plans,” Journal of Engineering
misconceptions of emergence for the semiconductor phenomenon driftAbstract Recent research in learning science has focused on students’ misconceptions about emergence. In emergentphenomena, the interactions of the agents in the phenomenon aggregate and form a self-organizing pattern that canbe seen at a higher level. One such emergent system, drift, is a fundamental mechanism for semiconductors. Thepurpose of this study was to demonstrate the presence and prevalence of misconceptions about emergence studentshave about drift, and to determine what relationships existed between the identified misconceptions. Forty-oneundergraduate engineering students participated in the written protocol study. Participants’ responses were
education. In addition, she has completed several graduate-level courses in the Department of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies. Dr. Morrison’s public policy master’s thesis was a research study on diversity policy in the Center for Aviation Studies and whether or not that policy impacted students’ considerations for leaving the academic program. Her expertise is in curriculum de- velopment, especially as it pertains to women and underrepresented minorities in education. Dr. Morrison takes an interdisciplinary approach to research, using both qualitative and quantitative methods that were informed by her background in education and public policy. c American Society for Engineering Education
within science, technology, engineeringand mathematics (STEM). For HBCUs, their success in graduating Black students in STEM washighlighted along with the missed opportunity of advancing their efforts to assist the U. S. goalof staying competitive within the STEM workforce (National Academies of Sciences,Engineering, and Medicine, 2019). For example, scholars found that HBCUs, while onlyaccounting for 3% of all post-secondary institutions in the United States, graduated 17% of allBlack students (Gasman & Nguyen, 2016). Additionally, as of 2019, 14.5% of Black graduateswere from HBCUs even though they made up less than 1% of all ABET-accredited programs(ABET, 2019; Deen, 2019; Fletcher et al., 2023). For Black women, a group representing
project that aligns with their topical area of interest, current skill level, andsought area of growth. The Lab engages students from first year to master’s level in varyingcapacities. Students may volunteer on a project as a trial, join in the context of a researchfellowship, or receive compensation for their efforts in the form of monetary payment, as aresearch assistant, or academic credit. They may also work on projects that have been adapted tosenior design engineering projects. Importantly, the Lab aims to meet the needs of the studentsand support their educational goals above the work product. Industry mentors, selected by thepartner organization, will consult directly with the student team and faculty mentor(s) on aregular basis
have used intersectionality tounderstand the experiences of students of color in higher education, few engineering educationstudies apply an intersectionality framework, particularly for WOC.After a short pilot study, we anticipate the survey results will generate three outcomes. First, thesurvey results will show what intersecting identities most impact the experience of WOC inengineering, and the extent to which these may operate differently for women of different racialethnic groups. Second, interview questions and potential themes will be created by groupingresults into clusters of intersectionality types or exemplars of intersecting identities. Finally, wewill generate strategies to overcome the challenge of the double bind for WOC in
andcomputational methods for structural analysis. A summary of the fatigue and related fracturemechanics content included in some popular Mechanics of Materials and Aerospace Structurestextbooks is included in Table A1 in Appendix A. It can be seen in Table A1 that the coverageof fatigue is cursory in typical Mechanics of Materials texts. Most aerospace structures textsinclude some coverage of fatigue topics, but still at an elementary level.A detailed, quantitative analysis of fatigue, requiring significant experience in techniques ofelasticity and study of the subject of fracture mechanics, is beyond the scope of undergraduatestudents and rightly finds a place among graduate studies in Aerospace Engineering. However,the importance of fatigue in
that characterized students’motivations toward engineering using interview methods found that female students whoseprimary motivation toward engineering was to help underserved populations left engineering at ahigher rate than female students with other primary motivations toward engineering. Thestudents participating in that study were initially enrolled at four different institutions, but thestudy population was quite small (n~30). The current research used quantitative methods tocharacterize the social responsibility (SR) attitudes of a larger population of incomingengineering students at a single institution. A high SR score was defined as an average scoreacross nine 7-point Likert-type items at the third quartile or higher. Among 122
students compared to their male counterparts. Similar results wereobserved in a four-day engineering summer camp for girls [14], where participants had increasedinterest and understanding of engineering topics after camp completion. On the other hand, amixed-method study [15] on a six-day middle school engineering summer camp showed nostatistically significant change in participants’ intrinsic motivation, interest in engineeringcareers, self-efficacy, and self-determination based on the quantitative data. Nonetheless,qualitative data indicated that camp experience positively impacted participants’ outlook towardengineering and STEM careers and their awareness of STEM career requirements.The Friday Institute of Education S-STEM survey has been used
Paper ID #37278Exploring Climate and Student Persistence in Engineeringand Computer Science through Engineering Culture (Workin Progress)Laura Ann Gelles (Postdoctoral Research Associate) I'm a Postdoctoral Research Associate studying undergraduate retention and climate at University of Texas at Dallas. Previously, I've studied institutional change and integrating social context into technical engineering curriculum at the University of San Diego, and the mentoring and career prospects and resources of engineering graduate students as a Ph.D. student at Utah State University.Amy Walker (Associate Dean for
onstudent perceptions of the activity, which could be useful for instructors interested in expandingtheir engineering curriculum to include skills less traditionally associated with engineering.MethodsThis work involved developing the experiment and carrying out the lesson, as well as recruitingand surveying of participants. Here, we discuss each of these components of our methods in aseparate sub-section.Participant recruitment and data collectionThis study was conducted at Stevens Institute of Technology, in the form of a 2-hour stand-alonelaboratory session facilitated by the authors of this paper. Participants were recruited for thisstudy through announcements to graduate and undergraduate engineering student email lists. Theemail announcement
engineering faculty’s lack offamiliarity with non-ABET professional skills, like entrepreneurial mindset and cultural agility,the difficulty of making changes in technical classes, and the limitations in assessing professionalskills. The researcher aims for the recommendations derived from this pilot study to raiseawareness of professional skill development within engineering curricula, fostering collaborationwith industry, and stimulating further research into enhancing the engineering curriculum with afocus on these essential skills.IntroductionTo succeed in the 21st-century workplace, engineering graduates need more than technical skillsor risk losing their jobs to automation [1, 2]. Professional skills complement a technicaleducation and are part
listening are key to success in a highly collaborative working environment [6].Studies have shown that involving students in engineering projects helps improve technical andinterpersonal communication within teams, with the suppliers of technical parts, and non-engineers. It has also helped improve English writing skills for international students [7].One would expect engineering students to possess high levels of these skills upon graduation;however, the results of past surveys show that engineering students are inadequately equipped tomeet this need [8-9]. Although engineering students are typically required to communicate theirdesign to a broader audience at the end of the senior capstone course, there is not much emphasisand attempt to provide
to achieve this is byintegrating biochemical engineering experiments into the undergraduate chemical engineeringlaboratory curriculum. However, biochemical processes are complex, involving strict handlingprotocols and long times linked to biological activity to convert raw materials into products. Inaddition, preparation steps and downstream separations differ significantly from those found inconventional chemical processing.The Chemical Engineering program at Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI) offers a biologicalconcentration for students who choose to focus their studies on biological processes. In addition,to reach a larger percentage of our graduates and to capture the complexity of biochemicalprocesses, a biochemical and
Journal, 2000, 34(2),298-306.5. Spurling, S. “Compression of Semesters or Intensity of Study: What is it that Increases Student Success?” City Coll. of San Francisco, CA. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Research and Planning Group (39th, Lake Arrowhead, CA, May 2-4, 2001).6. Kokkelenberg, E. C., Dillon, M. & Christy, S. M. “The Effects of Class Size on Student Grades at a Public University”, Economics of Education Review, 27(2), April 2008, 221–233.7. Morris, D., Scott, J., “ A Revised Pilot Study Examining the Effects of the Timing and Size of Classes on Student Performance in Introductory Accounting Classes”, Research in Higher Education Journal, 43 (April 2014), 1-5.
www.slayte.com Computational Thinking in the Formation of Engineers: Year 2IntroductionIn the United States, engineering students spend four or more years studying mathematics,science, and engineering topics that provide breadth and depth in a field of study. The structureof the engineering curriculum is not nationally standardized but accreditation requirements,professional society guidelines, and input from industrial advisory committees all helpuniversities develop robust curricula that continue to produce graduates prepared to designsystems around multiple realistic constraints using modern tools and practices [1] [2]. Central tothis modern design practice is the use of computers to collect and analyze data, as well as tocalculate solutions
assignment needs to be clearly defined and properly assigned to students. The nature of educational activities and projects assigned to construction students is not entirely aligned with collaboration features, and, therefore, educators should particularly define projects and assignments that promote collaboration and teamwork aspects in students. This study aims to report on different features of collaboration efforts between two programs. The research question was how a collaborative environment I perceived by students from different majors. A quantitative method in fall 2021 was employed to highlight various students’ perceptions of the subject. The results indicate that program identity, trust
Page 15.1194.7~18% in 1981).7 Investigations into the reasons for the higher male fraction have not beenundertaken. However, it may be that males are attracted to the T&E components, a dominanteffect in engineering schools.Another gender effect has not been investigated directly but is surely quite important. Notunlike most institutions offering K-5 teacher preparation programs, the MST graduates aremostly female (~75% for the MST major). However, there is a substantial difference; femaleMST graduates are well versed in all areas of STEM (STEM literate, if you will), whichshould result in MST graduates being effective role models for female K-5(8) students.8,9(3) Measured M, S and T&E content knowledgeThe depth of content knowledge is
of the course showed that the course was well-received (“Overall, I wouldrate this course as:” 4.60/5.0), and the students appreciated the discussion-based learning andexperiential components. Two of the 20 students accepted jobs in sustainability-related fieldsupon graduation. Some suggestions for future courses were to have fewer guest speakers andmore quantitative analysis in the course to balance the conceptual learning.In 2023, the Ralph E. Martin Department of Chemical Engineering received a BiggadikeInnovation Grant for the establishment of an engineering sustainability focus area in thedepartment. The purpose was to strengthen the current Introduction to Sustainable Engineeringcourse by developing lab components which allowed
Illinois.Wright College’s student success rates measured by completion have been strong and improvingrelative to other national urban community colleges, but are below state and national averages.In 2015 the college piloted a selective guaranteed admission program, Engineering Pathways (EP),to one of the nation’s top engineering schools (The Grainger College of Engineering at theUniversity of Illinois Urbana Champaign, UIUC). Initial results for the small first-year cohort werevery positive: 89% transfer rate and all students who transferred to UIUC graduated. Theprogram’s initial success rested on a) cohort model with a small number of students and strongcontrols; b) co-branding that attracted local students interested in pursuing engineering at UIUCwho
significant and should bestudied together [20].Study SettingPERSIST in Engineering is a project that seeks to make recommendations about teacherprofessional development and pedagogy that are best suited for engineering in rural elementaryschools. To do that, we are investigating how teachers learn about engineering through formalprofessional learning workshops and then watching closely as a subset of those teachersimplement engineering design units in their classes.Bea and Jared - This study is a pilot of our first investigation that takes an ethnographicapproach to better learn how teachers who recently learned about engineering teach engineeringto their students. We focus specifically on two teachers who teach the same grade in the sameschool. Bea