Department tours and participant research presentations 3:30 - 4:30 pm Return to hotel 5:00 - 6:30 pm Networking dinner and distinguished speaker 6:30 - 7:30 pm Panel discussion with newly recruited faculty members Day 2 8:00 - 8:30 am Breakfast 8:30 - 9:30 am Interactive session with program host(s) 9:30 - 11:30 am Campus tour 11:30 am DepartureAssessment MethodsAt the completion of the program, attendees completed a post
. Sturgill, A. Kirk, and G. B. Dadi, "Estimating earthwork volumes through use of unmanned aerial systems," Transportation Research Record, pp. 1-8, 2017.[5] S. Siebert and J. Teizer, "Mobile 3D mapping for surveying earthwork projects using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) system," Automation in Construction, vol. 41, pp. 1- 14, May 2014.[6] R. E. Pereira, S. Zhou, and M. Gheisari, "Integrating the use of UAVs and photogrammetry into a construction management course: Lessons learned," presented at the 35th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC 2018), 2018.[7] J. B. Sharma and D. Hulsey, "Integrating the UAS in Undergraduate Teaching and Research
the importance of imaginal capacity in the understanding and transformation ofreality (Anzaldúa, 2015; Freire, 2005; Marcuse, 1969; Scarry, 1985). Similar to the qualityillustrated by Royce, imagination here is not a tool for creativity or fantasizing a situation orindividual(s). The reason we build on liberatory perspectives as complementary to whatdiscussed by Royce and Buber is that these frameworks urge attention to broad social andpolitical structures that may influence our ethical reasoning and decision-making, in explicit orimplicit manners. Such factors may play a significant role at the institutional level when we thinkabout the culture of engineering practice and its conventional norms and structures and in generalthe role each
Resources make the decision based on apparent qualifications? How do we ensure faculty is prepared to teach for the College? Dimension 2- Course Assignments 10, 11, 13, Who and what determines which course(s) adjunct faculty will 14, 15, 16 teach and which specific adjunct faculty to assign to a specific course? Dimension 3- Faculty Performance 18, 19, 20 Are adjunct faculty rated? If so, by whom? How often? Dimension 4- College Communication Who is tasked with informing adjunct faculty of
. [Online]. Available: https://michaelhyatt.com/why-after-action-reviews-are-so-important/ K. Elissa, “Title of paper if known,” unpublished.[4] A. Badir, J. Liao, T. Kunberger, G.I. Papkov, L.D. Nguyen, and R. O’Neill, “Exam wrappers, reflection, and student performance in engineering mechanics,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition 2018, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, June, 2018.[5] P. Gezer-Templeton, E. Mayhew, D. Korte, and S. Schmidt, “Use of exam wrappers to enhance students’ metacognitive skills in a large introductory food science and human nutrition course,” Journal Of Food Science Education, vol 16, no. 1, pp. 28-36, 2017.[6] K.J. Metzger, B.A. Smith, E. Brown, and P.A.G. Soneral, “SMASH: A
. When reading, I try to connect the things I am reading about with what I already know.Reference[1] G. Mason, T. R. Shuman, and K. E. Cook, "Inverting (Flipping) Classrooms – Advantages and Challenges," presented at the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, 2013/06/23, June 2013. Available: https://peer.asee.org/19842[2] R. Bachnak and S. C. Maldonado, "A Flipped Classroom Experience: Approach and Lessons Learned," presented at the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2014/06/15, June 2014. Available: https://peer.asee.org/19942[3] C. J. Prust, R. W. Kelnhofer, and O. G. Petersen, "The Flipped Classroom: It's (Still) All About Engagement," presented at
work under the auspices of the National Science Foundation (NSF) undergrant number # 1644743. However, any items expressed in this paper do not necessarilyrepresent the views of NSF or its affiliates.References[1] M. Z. Lagoudas, S. Y. Yoon, and R. Boehm, “The Implementation and Assessment of an I- Corps Site: Lessons Learned,” Proceedings of the 126th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL, USA, 2019.[2] G. Lichtenstein, and T. Monroe-White, “Entrepreneurial mindset assessment reviews,” 2016. Available: https://venturewell.org/wp-content/uploads/EMAR-v1-1.pdf[3] S. Zappe, “Avoiding construct confusion: An attribute-focused approach to assessing
REACT is currently limited to teachers within the state, we feel the best way to reachother states is by sharing our model with other research institutions around the country. We arecurrently working with a research group at Cornell University to implement a similar annualworkshop that will serve their region. 10References[1] A. King, “From Sage on the Stage to Guide on the Side,” Coll. Teach., 2010.[2] C. Papanastasiou, “School, teaching and family influence on student attitudes toward science: Based on TIMSS data for Cyprus,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 71–86, Jan. 2002.[3] J. Osborne, S. Simon, and S
Summary and Future DirectionThe authors piloted a ND EPSCoR NATURE bridge camp at TMCC during the summer of 2019.The authors wanted to prepare participants for college in a manner that would also get themexcited about and interested in pursuing a STEM degree and career. The structure of the campconsisted of face-to-face sessions and three independent projects aimed at developing a mindsetthat will ultimately help participants succeed in college. Each independent project built uponknowledge gained during that face-to-face sessions and previous independent project(s). Theauthors believe this systematic process of progressively giving the participants moreresponsibility and less instruction over the course of the camp helped to promote the self
community was purposefully expanded to include center and university, parents andwomen of color in STEM to further improve the self-efficacy of the girls [27], [28].MethodologyThis research is part of a larger exploratory, longitudinal, 2-year mixed methods study. Theinitial phase was focused on unveiling areas of challenge in student perception, CT thinkingpractices, and STEM +CT integration. Student voice was optimized to help refine and evolve theintegration of STEM and the CT activities. CT thinking practices were pulled by the universityresearch team from Weintrop et al.’s Taxonomy of CT [15]. Those practices include DataCollection, Data Creation, Understanding a System as a Whole, Understanding the RelationshipBetween Parts of a System
/working-papers (accessed October, 2023).[10] C. S. Stocco, R. H. Thompson, J. M. Hart, and H. L. Soriano, "Improving the interview skills of college students using behavioral skills training," Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 495-510, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.385.[11] J. Akpan and C. Notar, "How to write a professional knockout resume to differentiate yourself," College Student Journal, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 880-891, 2012.[12] S. B. Knouse, "Impressions of the resume: The effects of applicant education, experience, and impression management," Journal of Business and Psychology, vol. 9, pp. 33-45, 1994.[13] I. Hunt, R. Taylor, and W. Oberman, "Advisory board engagement
, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis," Reviewof Educational Research, vol. 69, pp. 21-51, 1999.[8] ABET, "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022-2023," [Online]. Available:https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2022-2023/.[9] J. Mott and S. Peuker, "Achieving High Functioning Teams Using Team Based Learning inFlipped Classrooms," Paper presented at the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Seattle, Washington, 2015, doi: 10.18260/p.23482.[10] D.R. Bacon, K.A. Stewart, and W.S. Silver, "Lessons from the best and worst student teamexperiences: How a teacher can make the difference," Journal of Management Education, vol.23, pp. 467-488, 1999.[11
Network (KEEN).References1 Van den Beemt, A., MacLeod, M., Van der Veen, J., Van de Ven, A., van Baalen, S.,Klaassen, R., and Boon, M.: ‘Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision,teaching, and support’, Journal of Engineering Education, 2020, 109, (3), pp. 508-5552 Hernández-de-Menéndez, M., Vallejo Guevara, A., Tudón Martínez, J.C., HernándezAlcántara, D., and Morales-Menendez, R.: ‘Active learning in engineering education. A reviewof fundamentals, best practices and experiences’, International Journal on Interactive Design andManufacturing (IJIDeM), 2019, 13, (3), pp. 909-9223 Makki, B.I., Feng, F., Waqar, M.A., and Adhikari, I.M.: ‘Work Readiness, Decision-Making Self-Efficacy, and Career Exploration among
,” Alexandria, VA, 2024. Accessed: Jan. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics[7] W. Sinnott-Armstrong, “Consequentialism,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, CA, p. 12, Oct. 04, 2023. Accessed: Jan. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consequentialism[8] M. Mallinger, “Decisive decision making: an exercise using ethical frameworks,” Journal of Management Education, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 411–417, 1997.[9] J. C. Flanagan, “The critical incident technique,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 327–358, 1954.[10] K. FitzGerald, N. S. Seale, C. A. Kerins, and R. McElvaney, “The critical
forK-12 Students. [Master’s thesis, University of Memphis].https://digitalcommons.memphis.edu/etd/1852Hendrickson, J. L., Bye, T. K., Cockfield, B. A., Carter, K. R., & Elmer, S. J. (2020).Developing a science outreach program and promoting “PhUn” all year with rural K–12students. Advances in Physiology Education, 44(2), 212-216.http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/advan.00196.2019Komoroske, L. M., Hameed, S. O., Szoboszklai, A. I., Newsom, A. J., & Williams, S. L. (2015).A scientist’s guide to achieving broader impacts through K–12 STEM collaboration. Bioscience,65(3), 313-322. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu222Moskal, B., & Skokan, C. (2011). Supporting the k-12 classroom through university outreach.Journal of Higher Education Outreach
discipline-based educational research, including design self-efficacy, project-based learning, critical reflection in ethics, and high-impact practices.Lauren Christopher, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Dr. Lauren Christopher attended Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where she received her S. B. and S. M. in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in 1982, specializing in digital signal processing and chip design. She worked at RCAˆa C™s David SaChristine Krull, Indiana University-Purdue University IndianapolisEric W Adams, Indiana University-Purdue University IndianapolisShahrzad Ghadiri, Indiana University - Purdue University IndianapolisRichard Vernal Sullivan, Indiana University-Purdue University
, “Work in Progress: Development and Facilitation of aNew Certificate/Class for Undergraduate Teaching Assistants in Engineering and ComputingPrograms,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Baltimore, Maryland,USA: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/44221[2] D. Lopatto, “Undergraduate Research Experiences Support Science Career Decisions andActive Learning,” CBE-Life Sci. Educ., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 297–306, Dec. 2007, doi:10.1187/cbe.07-06-0039.[3] S. Kaul, C. W. Ferguson, P. M. Yanik, and Y. Yan, “Importance of UndergraduateResearch: Efficacy and Student Perceptions,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & ExpositionProceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2016
2-year and 4-year STEM degrees: Systemic change to support students’ diverse pathways. Committee on Barriers and Opportunities in Completing 2-year and 4-year STEM Degrees, Board on Science Education, Board on Higher Education, and the Workforce. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2016.10. Malcolm, S. and Feder, M, (editors); "Multiple STEM Pathways - The National Academies Press, 2016; https://www.nap.edu/read/21739/chapter/4 [Access Date: February 5, 2024]11. National Research Council, Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments, P. Bell, B. Lewenstein, A.W. Shouse, and M. A. Feder (Eds.). Board on Science Education, Center for
, D. B., Brown, E. R. (2015). To grab and hold: cultivating communal goals to overcome cultural and structural barriers in first-generation college student’s science interest. Transl Issues Psychol Sci, 1, 331–341.Azungah, T. (2018), "Qualitative research: deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis", Qualitative Research Journal, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 383-400. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00035Estrada, M., Burnett, M., Campbell, A. G., Campbell, P. B., Denetclaw, W. F., Gutiérrez, C. G., Hurtado, S., John, G. H., Matsui, J., McGee, R., Okpodu, C. M., Joan Robinson, T., Summers, M. F., Werner-Washburne, M., & Zavala, M. E. (2016). Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in
spentseveral weeks discussing the meaning of “equitable and sustainable STEM education.” Thegroup found that developing empathy for other communities is an important and recurring themeamong curricula that are designed with equity in mind [4-6], and hands-on activities arewidespread [6-8]. In addition, STEM literacy and the integration of multiple STEM areas werecommon themes [9-13]. Among all of the articles reviewed, the team found Jackson et al.’s“Equity-Oriented Conceptual Framework for K-12 STEM Literacy” [4] to be especially relevantand helpful in guiding the development of the lesson activities. Overarching themes thatappeared repeatedly in the team’s literature review and guided the subsequent work on theproject include the following
with differentskill sets. Considering that students reported improved performance in various aspects, suchas retention, confidence in their knowledge, and discipline, it would be pertinent to includethe faculty perspective. A comparative analysis between classes utilizing mind maps andthose that do not could provide valuable insights from the instructors' standpoint.References[1] S. J. T. Jansen, H. J. F. M. Boumeester, y R. M. Rooij, «Architecture students and research courses: are they aligned? Students’ attitude towards research courses», Learn. Environ. Res., vol. 25, n.o 2, pp. 549-563, jul. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10984-021-09380-z.[2] G. Shabiralyani, K. S. Hasan, N. Hamad, y N. Iqbal, «Impact of Visual Aids in Enhancing the
seesuch contradictions as an indication of untruths, falsehoods or misrememberings, but rather as areflection of [the] various and competing reasons for telling a story and the constraints on suchtellings” (Woodiwiss, 2017, p. 25).Stories Both Liberate and ConstrainStories are essential as they allow the “emergence of hitherto suppressed voices—the untoldstories that cannot be made heard in other presentational regime” (Kociatkiewicz & Kostera,2023, p. 9). Stories allow us to make sense of our world, and when we only have stories thatadhere to the dominant narrative, this “render[s] personal experiences irrelevant” (Woodiwiss,2017, p. 24). When underrepresented groups apply dominant narratives to attempt to make senseof their lives, this
, M., Hayes, J. A., Locke, B. D., & Lockard, A. J. (2018). Treatment- seeking college students with disabilities: Presenting concerns, protective factors, and academic distress. Rehabilitation psychology, 63(1), 55.Freeman, M. T., Anderman, L., & Jensen, M. J. (2012). Establish a sense of belonging. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 203.Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics. Journal of personality and social psychology, 102(4), 700.Groen, C. J., Paretti, M. C., McNair, L. D., Simmons, D. R., & Shew, A. (2018, April). Experiencing disability in undergraduate civil engineering education: An
must undergo a paradigm shift. It is critical to study why the current paradigmis not producing sufficient URM STEM graduates and to identify the root-level challengeswhich must be ameliorated to sustain long-term change. HBCUs are playing a pivotal rolein increasing diversity in STEM by preparing URMs for graduate studies in Science &Engineering (S&E). By working with HBCUs, Predominantly White Institutions (PWIs)can help change the diversity landscape of STEM graduate education. Our partnershipseeks to demonstrate the strength of a systematic change approach.Systemic Change ApproachThe CEPath (Creating Equitable Pathways to Graduate Education) project laid afoundation to address identified structural barriers inhibiting systemic
engineering pedagogy as well as topics in the fields of optimal control and artificial intel ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 1 Session XXXX Using Projects to Improve Student Engagement and Retention in a First-Year Engineering Course Matthew S. Kuester and Paul R. Griesemer Computer Science, Engineering, and Physics Department University of Mary Hardin-Baylor AbstractThe first-year engineering course at the
an NSF S-STEM grant.Two computer engineering students worked on this project for one semester. The objective ofthis project was to design a smart wireless sprinkler system to be used in residential and smallbusinesses. A wireless sensor network was designed and used throughout a lawn that tookperiodic moisture measurements and sent the data to the sprinkler control system, so that the unitcan make informed decision about what areas of a lawn need to be watered. The system that wasdesigned can be easily retrofitted into any existing sprinkler system. The top-level view of thesystem for their design is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Top Level View of the System [24]To design the smart wireless sprinkler system
teach global software engineering.Proceedings of EDULEARN17 International Conference on Education and New LearningTechnologies, Barcelona, Spain.Darban, M. (2021). Learning in virtual student teams: an examination of sharedleadership. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1-18.https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1916800Edstrom, W., Soderholm, D., Wedel, M. (2007). Teaching and learning. In E. Crawley, J.Malmqvist, S. Ostlund, & D. Brodeur (Eds.), Rethinking engineering education. The CDIOApproach (pp. 130-151). New York: Springer.Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in highereducation: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102,1-13
. Pimmel, “EvaluatingVirtual Communities of Practice for Faculty Development,” J. Fac. Dev., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 31–40, Jan. 2016.[4] G. Light, S. Calkins, M. Luna, and D. Drane, “Assessing the Impact of a Year-Long FacultyDevelopment Program on Faculty Approaches to Teaching,” Int. J. Teach. Learn. High. Educ.,vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 168–181, 2009.[5] D. Carpenter, K. Hayes, C. Ward, and A. Gerhart, “Assessment and Evaluation of aComprehensive Course Modification Process,” The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship,vol. 2, no. 2, 2011.[6] A.L. Gerhart and D.D. Carpenter, “Campus-wide Course Modification Program to ImplementActive & Collaborative Learning and Problem-based Learning to Address the EntrepreneurialMindset,” Proceedings of the 2013
4.221 0.701 Traditional S 23 189 3.889 0.835 4.268 0.853 3.949 0.753 4.060 0.828 Pilot F 22 84 3.889 0.851 4.433 0.666 3.964 0.649 4.247 0.623 Pilot S 23 44 4.030 0.715 4.530 0.539 4.150 0.566 4.385 0.592There are no significant differences in mean Recognition change between Traditional and Pilotsequences from Sep 2022 to May 2023 (F=1.5358, df1=1, df2=185.9, p=0.2168), and post-hoccomparisons revealed no significant Recognition change within either course sequence(Traditional p-value = 0.5551; Pilot p-value = 0.2785) (Figure 1). Similar results were found forPerformance/Competence (F=1.5911, df1=1, df2=213.2, p=0.2085) with insignificant
AnnualConference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. https://peer.asee.org/42457[3] Andrade, N., & Smela, E., & Nguyen, V., & Bigio, D., & Egyen-Davis, A., & Nganjo,D. (2022, August), Environmentally and Socially Responsible Engineering - AssessingStudent Empowerment Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. https://peer.asee.org/41569[4] S. Hoffmann, I. Hua, E. Blatchley, and L. Nies, "Integrating sustainability into coursesacross the engineering curriculum: a faculty workshop model," in ASEE Ann. Conf.Expo, Louisville, KY, Jun 20-23 2010, pp. AC 2010-1802, 15.773.1, doi:DOI:10.18260/1-2--16732. https://peer.asee.org/16732[5] A. L. Welker, V. Smith, S. Shrestha, and K. M. Sample-Lord