[Accessed January 28, 2021].[6] ABET, “ABET Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020,” URL: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2019-2020/ [Accessed August 8, 2019][7] B.A. Oakley, D.M. Hanna, Z. Kuzmyn, and R.M. Felder, “Best Practices Involving Teamwork in the Classroom: Results from a Survey of 6435 Engineering Student Respondents,” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 50, No. 3, 2007.[8] R. Lingard and S. Barkataki, “Teaching Teamwork in Engineering and Computer Science,” IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Rapid City, 2011.[9] M.L. Loughry, M.W. Ohland, and D.J. Woehr, “Assessing Teamwork Skills for Assurance of
Academy is on efficacy in this area, thenthere is some evidence to suggest the investment in the STEM Academy has paid off.References[1] New American Economy. (2017). Sizing up the gap in our supply of STEM workers: Data & analysis. New American Economy. https://research.newamericaneconomy.org/report/sizing-up-the-gap-in- our-supply-of-stem-workers/[2] Goldman, A., Schweig, J., Buenaventura, M., & Wright, C. (2017). Geographic and demographic representativeness of junior reserve officer training corps. Santa Monica, CA; Rand Corporation[3] Kamarck, K. N. (2020). Defense Primer: Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (JROTC). In Focus. Congressional Research Service. December 2, 2020.[4] Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D
): 1447-1451[12] Yeager, David S., Carissa Romero, Dave Paunesku, Christopher S. Hulleman, Barbara Schneider, Cintia Hinojosa, Hae Yeon Lee et al. "Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school." Journal of educational psychology 108, no. 3 (2016): 374.[13] Brady, Shannon T., Geoffrey L. Cohen, Shoshana N. Jarvis, and Gregory M. Walton. "A brief social-belonging intervention in college improves adult outcomes for black Americans." Science Advances 6, no. 18 (2020): eaay3689.[14] Silva, Mariana, Matthew West, and Craig Zilles. "Measuring the Score Advantage on Asynchronous Exams in an Undergraduate CS Course." Proceedings of the 51st ACM
ID: 186; Line: 12) 1 Read the poem line as is I say it’s important to focus on what people want the most 2 Highlight words within the line that reference I say it’s important to focus on what people want the most supply chain key terms 3 Extract the phrases that reference supply focus on what people want the most chain key term(s) 4 Relate it back to the general supply chain Item Classification concept(s) referenced. In this case there are Different Level of Importance two. These now become the condensed codes Table 2. Identification and extraction of supply
] National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2004.[2] National Academy of Engineering, Educating the Engineer of 2020. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2005.[3] E. F. Redish and K. A. Smith, “Looking Beyond Content: Skill Development for Engineers,” J. Eng. Educ., no. July, pp. 295–307, 2008, doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2008.tb00980.x.[4] I. B. Mena, S. E. Zappe, and T. A. Litzinger, “Preparing the Engineer of 2020: Analysis of Alumni Data,” in ASEE Annual Conference, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://cms.jee.org/21819%0A%0A.[5] S. R. Daly, E. A. Mosyjowski, and C. M. Seifert, “Teaching creativity in
and engineeringspecifically."CitationsAlimahomed, S. (2010). Thinking outside the rainbow: Women of color redefining queer politics and identity. Social Identities, 16(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504631003688849Cech, E. A., & Waidzunas, T. J. (2011). Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: The experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students. Engineering Studies, 3(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2010.545065Cooper, K. M., & Brownell, S. E. (2016). Coming Out in Class: Challenges and Benefits of Active Learning in a Biology Classroom for LGBTQIA Students. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(3), ar37. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0074Jennings, M., Roscoe, R
," Digital Promise, San Mateo, CA, 2020.[3] M. Adnan and K. Anwar, "Online Learning Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: Students' Perspectives," Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, vol. 2, no. 1, 2020.[4] I. Chirikov, K. Soria, B. Horgos and D. Jones-White, "Undergraduate and Graduate Students' Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic," SERU Consortium Reports, University of California Berkley, 2020.[5] J. Malisch, B. Harris, S. Sherrer, K. Lewis, S. Shepherd, P. MacCarthy, J. Spott, E. Karam, N. Moustaid-Moussa, J. Calarco, L. Ramalingam, A. Taller, J. Canas-Carrell, K. Ardon-Dryer, D. Weiser, X. Bernal and J. Deitloff, "Opinion: In the wake of COVID-19, academia needs new solutions to ensure gender equity
: A fourfold classification,” British Journal ofManagement, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 131-142, 2003.[2] J. R. Hackman and A. C. Edmondson, “Groups as agents of change,” in Handbook oforganization development, T. Cummings, Ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 2008, pp. 167-186.[3] L. Long III. and J. A. Mejia, “Conversations about diversity: Institutional barriers forunderrepresented engineering students,” Journal of Engineering, vol. 105, no. 2, 2016.[4] E. J. Theobald, M. J. Hill, E. Tran, S. Agrawal, E. N. Arroyo, S. Behling, N. Chambwe, D. L.Cintron, J. D. Cooper, G. Dunster, J. A. Grummer, K. Hennessey, J. Hsiao, N. Iranon, L. JonesII, H. Jordt, M. Keller, M. E. Lacey, C. E. Littlefield…S. Freeman, “Active learning narrowsachievement gaps for
/ngv:78746.[3] K. A. J. Mohr and E. S. Mohr, “Understanding Generation Z Students to Promote a Contemporary Learning Environment,” J. Empower. Teach. Excell., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 84–94, 2017, doi: 10.15142/T3M05T.[4] H. Hyytinen, A. Toom, and L. Postareff, “Unraveling the complex relationship in critical thinking, approaches to learning and self-efficacy beliefs among first-year educational science students,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 67, no. August, pp. 132–142, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.08.004.[5] S. K. Wang, H. Y. Hsu, T. C. Reeves, and D. C. Coster, “Professional development to enhance lecturers’ practices in using information and communication technologies (ICTs) as cognitive tools: Lessons
ceiling for women leaders", Women in Management Review, Vol. 22 No. 6, pp. 482-496, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420710778718[9] A. García-Holgado, A. Camacho Díaz, and F. J. García-Peñalvo, “La brecha de género en el sector STEM en América Latina: una propuesta europea,” (The gender gap in the STEM sector in Latin America: a European proposal). October 9-11, 2019. Madrid, SPAIN. V International Congress on Learning, Innovation and Competitiveness (CINAIC 2019). DOI: 10.26754/CINAIC.2019.0143[10] A. Garcia-Holgado, J. Mena, F. J. Garcia- Peñalvo, J. Pascual, M. Heikkinen, S. Harmoinen, L. Garcia-Ramos, R. Penabaena-Niebles, and L. Amores, “Gender equality in STEM programs: a proposal to analyse the situation of a
set of histograms,figure 1, show the students’ grades on both assignments while the second, figure 2, shows thosescores standardized, otherwise known as Z-score normalized. Figure 1: Student GradesFigure 1’s histograms show the counts of each score, with the binwidth and numbers of binsappropriate to the counts. The spread for the UN SDG Assignment was much larger than theFinal Written Report, with a range of 28, minimum of 68, and maximum of 96 relative to a rangeof 14, minimum of 82 and maximum of 96, respectively. This spread becomes considerablewhen looking at figure 2’s histograms: Figure 2: Student Grades, StandardizedWhen considering the standardized scores, the UN SDG
additionalcollege graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. ExecutiveOffice of the President. Washington, DC.[3] Estrada, M., Burnett, M., Campbell, A., Campbell, P., Denetclaw, W. F., Gutierrez, C. G.,Hurtado, S., John, G. H., Matsui, J., McGee, R., Okpodu, C. M., Robinson, T. J., Summers, M.F., Werner-Washburne, M., & Zavala, M. E. (2016). Improving Underrepresented MinorityStudent Persistence in STEM. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(5), 1–10.[4] Yoder, B. L. (2017). Engineering by the numbers. Washington, DC: American Society forEngineering Education.[5] Fiegener, M. K. National Science Foundation, Division of Science ResourcesStatistics.(2010). Numbers of doctorates awarded continue to grow in 2009; indicators
students (S-STEM), Researcher Practitioner Partnership (RPP), IUSE, and EAGER.Alexandria Benedict, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Alexandria Benedict is a graduate student at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte pursuing her Master’s in Computer Science. She is a research assistant under the RPP STEM Ecosystem Project which helps study the effects of computational thinking inside classrooms.Audrey RorrerDr. David K. Pugalee, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Dr. David Pugalee is a full professor, and Director of the Center for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education (STEM) at UNC Charlotte. The recipient of millions of dollars in grant- funding, Dr. Pugalee has also
/programs/digest/d19/tables/dt19_325.35.asp [Accessed Feb. 11, 2021].[2] “Digest of Education Statistics, 2019,” nces.ed.gov.https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d19/tables/dt19_325.45asp [Accessed Feb. 11, 2021].[3] “Degree Attainment - Research and Trends for Women in STEM,” Research and Trends forWomen in STEM, Aug. 17, 2016. https://research.swe.org/2016/08/degree-attainment/.[Accessed 11 December 2020].[4] J. Trapani and K. Hale, “Higher Education in Science and Engineering | NSF - NationalScience Foundation,” ncses.nsf.gov. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20197/demographic-attributes-of-s-e-degree-recipients.[5] M. Estrada et al., “Improving Underrepresented Minority Student Persistence in STEM,”CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 15, no. 3, p
Electromagnetic Induction Problems. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(1), 215.Borrego, M., Foster, M. J., & Froyd, J. E. (2014). Systematic Literature Reviews in Engineering Education and Other Developing Interdisciplinary Fields. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 45-76. doi:10.1002/jee.20038Ferretti, R. P., MacArthur, C. A., & Dowdy, N. S. (2000). The effects of an elaborated goal on the persuasive writing of students with learning disabilities and their normally achieving peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 694.Gainsburg, J., Fox, J., & Solan, L. M. (2016). Argumentation and decision making in professional practice. Theory Into Practice, 55(4
interfacing with the office of research of the institution Member/s facilitating the different aspects related to the Scientific Core Expert research being proposed and the connections with gaps in literature Educational Core Member/s facilitating the different program of study for Expert students involved in the proposal effort Recruitment Many programs require a plan for the recruitment of Coordinator students and the support from the institution to achieve it Member/s reviewing and editing the draft in consultation Review and
wide range of projects. I am interested in exploringavenues to democratize this form of education to help more students from all backgrounds haveaccess to these opportunities. References [1] Vosniadou, Stella. How Children Learn. Educational Practices Series, I nternational Bureau of Education, 2001. [2] S. Bell. Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future, The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83:2, 39-43, 2010. [3] Y. Li, A. H. Schoenfeld, A. A. diSessa, A. C. Graesser, L. C. Benson, L. D. English, and R. A. Duschl. Design and Design Thinking in STEM Education. Journal for STEM Education Research, 2: 93–104, 2019. [4
”, Cambridge University Press, 2018.[2] L. Hellsten, S. Martin, L. McIntyre and A. Kinzel, ”Women on the Academic Tenure Track: An Autoethnographic Inquiry”, International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, vol. 2, no. 1, 2011.[3] National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, ”Survey of Doctorate Recipients”, National Science Foundation, 2015.[4] J. Roy, ”Engineering by the numbers”, American Society for Engineering Education, 2019.[5] Y. Yang and D. Carroll, ”Understanding Female STEM Faculty Experiences of Subtle Gender Bias from Microaggressions Perspective”, in Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference and Expo, 2016.[6] A. G d’Entremont and H. Gustafson, ”PANEL: Gender bias in student evaluations of
experiential learning to beginbuilding patterns in their minds about how water moves past objects.Hands-On Demo. The streamline visualization activity is described to students asDesign-Build-Test-Communicate (DBTC) practice: • Design: a visual that shows how water flows around an ROV to help determine center of drag (aka center of pressure) • Build: prototype using dominoes falling as the ”streamlines” around the ROV • Test: use a rod to start all lines of dominoes falling at once; record video; note where the dominoes fall “slower” around the ROV; interpret how the shape and orientation of the ROV contributes to “slower flow” and increased drag • Communicate: make 1-2 slides on why you chose this design; picture(s) of the
,” J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ., vol. 17, no. 1 pp. 156-62. Mar. 2016.[5] A. M. Depelteau, et al., “SYMBIOSIS: development, implementation, and assessment of amodel curriculum across biology and mathematics at the introductory level,” CBE Life Sci Educ.,vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 342-7. Fall 2010.[6] J. S. Krim, et al., “Models and Impacts of Science Research Experiences: A Review of theLiterature of CUREs, UREs, and TREs,” CBE Life Sci Educ., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. ar65. Winter2019.[7] E. Afgan, et al., “The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborativebiomedical analyses: 2018 update,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 46, no. W1, pp. W537–W544,July 2018.[8] “Endicott College Bioinformatics: VCF2FA ,” Endicott College November 26, 2019.[Online
, doi: 10.1007/s11229-012-0179-7.[5] M. O’Rourke, S. Crowley, and C. Gonnerman, “On the nature of cross-disciplinary integration: A philosophical framework,” Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. Part C Stud. Hist. Philos. Biol. Biomed. Sci., vol. 56, pp. 62–70, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.10.003.[6] D. Ellis, “Changing the lens: The role of reframing in educational development,” Improve Acad., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 142–150, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1002/tia2.20067.[7] B. K. Jesiek, L. K. Newswander, and M. Borrego, “Engineering education research: Discipline, community, or field?,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 39–52, 2009, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01004.x.
Engineering Students using Classification and Regression," in 6th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, Memphis, TN, 2013.[6] "My Student Support Program," [Online]. Available: http://www.uwindsor.ca/studentexperience/500/my-student-support-program. [Accessed 9 February 2020].[7] "TAO Office of Student Experience," n.d.. [Online]. Available: http://www.uwindsor.ca/studentexperience/358/tao. [Accessed 19 March 2020].[8] "Self Help Resources (Campus Wide & Groups) Checklist," February 2019. [Online]. Available: https://filer01.taoconnect.org/index.php/s/DnZzBvYrsyFLERx?path=%2F1.%20Self- Help%20Resources%20(Campus-Wide%20%26%20Groups)%2FTAO%20Pathway%20Checklist. [Accessed 31 March 2020].
. AcknowledgementsThe authors are grateful for support provided by the Engineering Information Foundation. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Engineering Information Foundation. Work CitedAeby, P., Fong, R., Isaac, S., Vukmirovic, M., & Tormey, R. (2019). The impact of gender on engineering students’ group work experiences. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 35(3), 756–765.Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. John Wiley & Sons.Dryburgh, H
response when the task was framed as “draw an engineer” vs.“draw yourself as an engineer.”AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to acknowledge the children who participated in this research study andthe SEEK mentors and site coordinators who worked with the children and supported our datacollection. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science FoundationDivision of Research on Learning under Grant Numbers DRL-1614710, 1614739, and 1615143.Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Wealso would like to thank Christopher Wright for their feedback and input on earlier versions ofthis
institutional progress.With each year, the summit improves and has growing interest across the United States. Byfocusing on the experience of past participants of the summit, the blueprint will continue to beimproved and ultimately transferrable for others to implement for years to come.AcknowledgmentsWe sincerely acknowledge Dr. Dannette Gomez Beane, Dr. Catherine Amelink, Dr. Jack Lesko,Dean Karen DePauw, and Dr. Christian Matheis for their key roles in the creation, development,and execution of the HBCU/MSI Research Summit.ReferencesBrinkmann, S., Kvale, S. (2014). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing, SAGE.Ghee, M., Collins, D., Wilson, V., & Pearson, W. (2014). The Leadership Alliance: twenty years of
transfer to a STEM major. While the NSF S-STEM grant specifically focuseson the impact of LIAT students, this population encompasses a fully representative population,one that we aim to carry over to the entire College of Engineering, something that has been anarea of concern and growth for STEM majors/colleges everywhere. Within the two cohorts,underrepresented minority students account for 38% of the total student population, the femalepopulation is 44% of total population, and roughly 38% of students in the program are identifiedas having high financial need through their Pell eligibility.The GEARSET program was designed as a defined pathway to Engineering for students who didnot fulfill the standard admissions criteria for the college of
very different results.Trina’s efficiency started off as the best, but had a steep decline from 2015 to 2016. Sharp’sefficiency was never near the top but did not have that steep decline despite being the same typeof panel. Further investigation will be done into the loss of data for certain months as well as theeffect that cleaning has on the efficiency of our solar panels.5References 1 New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, NY-Sun Annual Performance Report through December 31, 2015, Final Report (March 2016), p. S-1 2 Kaya Laterman, “Is New York Ready for Solar Power?” The New York Times, The New York Times, 30 Sept. 2016, www.nytimes.com/2016/10/02/realestate/is-new-york-ready-for-solar
EDC graduate track was approved. With MCEDC, her main duties have included student advising and academic program development. Recently, she co-developed the curriculum for the new Minor in Global Engineering offered by the CU Boulder College of Engineering and Applied Science starting in fall 2016. Ms. Sandekian earned B.S. and M.S. degrees in Aerospace Engineering Sciences at CU Boulder, a Spe- cialist in Education (Ed. S.) degree in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies from the University of Northern Colorado, and earned her Ph.D. in the Higher Education Student Affairs Leadership program from the University of Northern Colorado in 2017. c American Society for Engineering
, has anapproximately 60 seconds training time while achieving 95%-97% accuracy on the MNIST testset. The finalized model is Jetson ready. 98.5 98 97.5 97 96.5 96 95.5 95 94.5 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Figure 11: Runtime (s) vs. Accuracy (%) Baseline Network Batch Size 1024 Training Epochs 100 Learning Rate 0.01 Optimizer Adam Hidden Units 800