stimulated my learning. 1 15 6 I am very satisfied with this workshop. 1 15 7 The presenter(s) was enthusiastic and pleasant. 1 15 8 The workshop was well organized. 1 15 9 I feel prepared to use this module in my class. 3 11 2 10 My students have the necessary background knowledge to complete this module
and understanding the electrical characteristics from a data sheet,etc. Using the Analog Discovery Boards, several experiments and tutorials were created, for in-class demonstration and/or lab experiments. Such an example is presented in figure 6. In thisexperiment the transfer characteristics of a CMOS logic gate used as an inverter is investigated. 1 14 1A S VCC 2 13 1B N 4B 12 3 1Y 7 4A
Colleges and Universities (2016). Recent Trends in GeneralEducation Design, Learning Outcomes, and Teaching Approaches, Association ofAmerican Colleges and Universities, Washington, DC.Barber, James. Integration of Learning: A Grounded Theory Analysis of CollegeStudents’ Learning, American Educational Research Journal, June 2012, Vol. 49, No. 3,pp. 590-617.Bloom, B. S.; Engelhart, M. D.; Furst, E. J.; Hill, W. H.; Krathwohl, D. R. (1956).Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. HandbookI: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.Boix-Mansilla, V. (2005). Assessing student work at disciplinary crossroads. Change, 37(January/February), 14–21.Bordogna, Joseph, Fromm, Eli, and Ernst, Edward W. (2013
specifically, responses from Question 2 of the firstand second activities were qualitatively evaluated using the rubric presented in Table 4. Thisparticular question, which was repeated in both activities, prompts the students with “Whatinformation do you think you need to know to answer the driving question? List all of the factorsand/or variables that are needed and identify which ones are the most important. For eachfactor/variable listed, offer a rationale for why it is needed. For example, through whatmechanism/s does it affect strength enhancement?” The rubric was designed to gain an overviewof the general state of student understanding of nanomaterials at the nanoscale and theirrelevance in the context of cement mortar. Scores of Poor, Good
-study Scholar. She served as chair of S-STEP from 2013-2015 and is a current Co-PI of two National Science Foundation (NSF) funded grants: Designing Teaching: Scaling up the SIMPLE Design Framework for Interactive Teaching Development and a research initiation grant: Student-directed differ- entiated learning in college-level engineering education. Her research centers on facilitating and studying her role in faculty development self-study collaboratives. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Applying Conjecture Mapping as a Design-Based Research Method to Examine the Design and Implementation of a Teaching Development Project for
, Switzerland, Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. v-viii.[3] C. J. Thaiss and T. M. Zawacki, Engaged Writers Dynamic Disciplines, Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook Publishers, Inc. , 2006.[4] D. Melzer, Assignments Across the Curriculum, Boulder, CO: Utah State University Press, 2014.[5] M. Eodice, A. E. Geller and N. Lerner, The Meaningful Writing Project, Boulder: Utah State University Press, 2016.[6] S. Harrington, S. Dinitz, R. Bennett, L. Davenport and K. Warrender, "Turning Stories from the Writing Center into Useful Knowledge: Writing Centers, WID Programs, and Partnerships for Change," in Writing Program and Writing Center Collaboration: Transcending Boundaries, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, pp. 141-160.[7] M
: http://www.science-engage.org/index.html. [Accessed April 26, 2018]. [7] J. Hempel. “The Zuckerbeg hearings were silicon valley’s debut.” [Online]. Available: Wired, https://www.wired.com/story/the-zuckerberg-hearings-were-silicon-valleys-ultimate-debut/. [Accessed April 26, 2018].[8] D. MacMillan, and R. Winkler. “Silicon valley to washington: why don’t you get us?” [Online]. Available: The Wall Street Journal, https://www.wsj.com/articles/silicon-valley-to-washington-why-dont-you-get-us- 1523451203. [Accessed April 26, 2018].[9] March for Science. [Online]. Available: https://www.marchforscience.com/. [Accessed April 26, 2018].[10] S. Khimm, and A. Rafferty. “Pruitt makes EPA science board more industry friendly
of faculty in the establishment of MEERCat and how faculty-led researchprojects can contribute to informing both policy and practice at the department level. Thenarratives provided details on the history behind the development of these research projects, thelarge data collection efforts involved, and the collaborations inside the University that help theprojects function smoothly. Faculty who engage in course innovation or education research canuse this paper as a case study of how to get actively and collectively involved in influencingdepartment-level practices at their respective institutions.References[1] J. L. Melsa, S. A. Rajala, and J. P. Mohsen, “Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education
DIRECT concept inventory. In the same vein, possibilities for future workinclude assessing the impact that context variables can have on the effectiveness of PeerInstruction and its implementation in different settings, as well as evaluating the pros andcons in instructors’ workload, and possibilities for conducting classrooms research.References[1] D. W. Johnson, R. T. Johnson, and K. A. Smith, Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Interaction Book Company, 1991.[2] M. Prince, “Does active learning work ? A review of the research,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, pp. 223–231, 2004.[3] K. A. Smith, S. D. Sheppard, D. W. Johnson, and R. T. Johnson, “Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices,” J. Eng
University, and PhD in Mathematics from Auburn University in 2014. He is a contributor to the Australian Maths Trust, and member of the MASAMU international research group for mathematics.Dr. Carl Pettis, Alabama State University Carl S. Pettis, Ph.D. Professor of Mathematics Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Al- abama State University Administrative role: Interim Provost Office of Academic Affairs Alabama State UniversityDr. Uma Kannan, Alabama State University Dr. Uma Kannan is Assistant Professor of Computer Information Systems in the College of Business Administration at Alabama State University, where she has taught since 2017. She received her Ph.D. degree in Cybersecurity from Auburn University
andreferential language to communicate conceptual understandings. Finally, the holistic applicationof rubrics to interview data allowed for understandings of the engineering design process to beexpressed in multiple ways: both implicit and explicit understandings could be expressed byparticipants and then scored by analysts’ application of the rubrics to each participant’s interviewas a whole.References[1] E. P. Douglas, S. S. Jordan, M. Lande, and A. E. Bumbaco, “Artifact elicitation as a method of qualitative inquiry in engineering education,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA, USA, June 2015.[2] Engineering Accreditation Commission. “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs,” Accreditation Board for
programs tend to focus on leadership asa set of skills or experiences bolted onto a traditional engineering education with limited formalevidence of the impact these experiences have on student development.The purpose of this study is to test the effect of experiences engineering students have in leadershiproles on their perceived gains in leadership skills, using a national dataset. The framework guidingthis study is a model for engineering leadership identity constructed from Lave and Wenger’scommunities of practice model and Komives et al.’s model for leadership identity development(LID) which recognizes that the engineering formation process is, at its core, an identitydevelopment process. Engineering leadership is theorized to develop from
conceptualprimitive works. Then a final project was created in the course (2010~2013); students wererequired to finish a group project adopting the primitives lectured in the classes. Studentstaking the EOS course could thus be well trained and solve problems as expected. However,we got some feedbacks from graduated students, who asked to introduce more skills ofinnovation and imagination in such a course. Their values can be demonstrated not only fromtheir competencies of hands-on skills but also from designing a new product. Hence, in the fourth phase (2014~2016), CIM was adopted and SCAMPER wasintroduced in the EOS courses. Students were encouraged to put more innovation skills intotheir final project. The more verbs (S, C, A, M, P, E, R) applied to
in everyday life. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley, 2013.[8] D. Sue, Microaggressions and marginality. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley, 2010.[9] K. Kawakami, J. Friesen and L. Vingilis-Jaremko, "Visual attention to members of own and other groups: Preferences, determinants, and consequences", Social and Personality Psychology Compass, vol. 12, no. 4, p. e12380, 2018.[10] B. Hansen, P. Rakhshan, A. Ho and S. Pannasch, "Looking at others through implicitly or explicitly prejudiced eyes", Visual Cognition, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 612-642, 2015.[11] M. Mele, S. Federici and J. Dennis, "Believing Is Seeing: Fixation Duration Predicts Implicit Negative Attitudes", PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 8, p. e105106, 2014.[12] L. Granka, T. Joachims and G. Gay, "Eye
describedbeing exalted for being the first in their family to pursue such advanced education. In this way Intersectional Perspectives 10they felt pressure to stay in their doctoral programs even when they questioned if it was right forthem. Erica’s familial experience highlighted this conflicting message: Since I'm the only one in my family who has gone to college and to graduate school, every time I come around, my family is like, "oh, you're gonna be a doctor!"… [So] every single time that I'm at work and I'm considering "is this really what I want to do," I have that in the back of my mind, wait, I'm going to let all these people down? And it feel[s
position. However, it has been noted by the DOE AdvancedScientific Computing Advisory Committee (2) and others (3) (4) (5) that the DOE Laboratories faceworkforce development and recruitment challenges. Further complicating the matter is theunderrepresentation of women and minorities in high end computing. Disparities in representation andparticipation impede educational attainment and access to the Science and Technology (S&T) workforce.While underrepresentation and lack of diversity are noted generally across S&T fields, they are more 1pronounced in mathematical and computing sciences (6) (7) (8) (9). Statistically, women earnapproximately 40 percent of the undergraduate degrees in
proceedings, San Antonio.https://peer.asee.org/31357[10] Pearson Weatherton, Y., & Chen, V. C. P., & Mattingly, S. P., & Rogers, K., & Sattler, M. L. (2012,June), Sustainable Engineering Internships: Creation and Assessment Paper presented at 2012 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/21976[11] Powers, K., & Chen, H. L., & Prasad, K. V., & Gilmartin, S. K., & Sheppard, S. (2018, June), Exploring HowEngineering Internships and Undergraduate Research Experiences Inform and Influence College Students' CareerDecisions and Future Plans Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah.https://peer.asee.org/30491
Department tours and participant research presentations 3:30 - 4:30 pm Return to hotel 5:00 - 6:30 pm Networking dinner and distinguished speaker 6:30 - 7:30 pm Panel discussion with newly recruited faculty members Day 2 8:00 - 8:30 am Breakfast 8:30 - 9:30 am Interactive session with program host(s) 9:30 - 11:30 am Campus tour 11:30 am DepartureAssessment MethodsAt the completion of the program, attendees completed a post
. Sturgill, A. Kirk, and G. B. Dadi, "Estimating earthwork volumes through use of unmanned aerial systems," Transportation Research Record, pp. 1-8, 2017.[5] S. Siebert and J. Teizer, "Mobile 3D mapping for surveying earthwork projects using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) system," Automation in Construction, vol. 41, pp. 1- 14, May 2014.[6] R. E. Pereira, S. Zhou, and M. Gheisari, "Integrating the use of UAVs and photogrammetry into a construction management course: Lessons learned," presented at the 35th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC 2018), 2018.[7] J. B. Sharma and D. Hulsey, "Integrating the UAS in Undergraduate Teaching and Research
the importance of imaginal capacity in the understanding and transformation ofreality (Anzaldúa, 2015; Freire, 2005; Marcuse, 1969; Scarry, 1985). Similar to the qualityillustrated by Royce, imagination here is not a tool for creativity or fantasizing a situation orindividual(s). The reason we build on liberatory perspectives as complementary to whatdiscussed by Royce and Buber is that these frameworks urge attention to broad social andpolitical structures that may influence our ethical reasoning and decision-making, in explicit orimplicit manners. Such factors may play a significant role at the institutional level when we thinkabout the culture of engineering practice and its conventional norms and structures and in generalthe role each
Resources make the decision based on apparent qualifications? How do we ensure faculty is prepared to teach for the College? Dimension 2- Course Assignments 10, 11, 13, Who and what determines which course(s) adjunct faculty will 14, 15, 16 teach and which specific adjunct faculty to assign to a specific course? Dimension 3- Faculty Performance 18, 19, 20 Are adjunct faculty rated? If so, by whom? How often? Dimension 4- College Communication Who is tasked with informing adjunct faculty of
. [Online]. Available: https://michaelhyatt.com/why-after-action-reviews-are-so-important/ K. Elissa, “Title of paper if known,” unpublished.[4] A. Badir, J. Liao, T. Kunberger, G.I. Papkov, L.D. Nguyen, and R. O’Neill, “Exam wrappers, reflection, and student performance in engineering mechanics,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition 2018, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, June, 2018.[5] P. Gezer-Templeton, E. Mayhew, D. Korte, and S. Schmidt, “Use of exam wrappers to enhance students’ metacognitive skills in a large introductory food science and human nutrition course,” Journal Of Food Science Education, vol 16, no. 1, pp. 28-36, 2017.[6] K.J. Metzger, B.A. Smith, E. Brown, and P.A.G. Soneral, “SMASH: A
. When reading, I try to connect the things I am reading about with what I already know.Reference[1] G. Mason, T. R. Shuman, and K. E. Cook, "Inverting (Flipping) Classrooms – Advantages and Challenges," presented at the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, 2013/06/23, June 2013. Available: https://peer.asee.org/19842[2] R. Bachnak and S. C. Maldonado, "A Flipped Classroom Experience: Approach and Lessons Learned," presented at the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2014/06/15, June 2014. Available: https://peer.asee.org/19942[3] C. J. Prust, R. W. Kelnhofer, and O. G. Petersen, "The Flipped Classroom: It's (Still) All About Engagement," presented at
work under the auspices of the National Science Foundation (NSF) undergrant number # 1644743. However, any items expressed in this paper do not necessarilyrepresent the views of NSF or its affiliates.References[1] M. Z. Lagoudas, S. Y. Yoon, and R. Boehm, “The Implementation and Assessment of an I- Corps Site: Lessons Learned,” Proceedings of the 126th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL, USA, 2019.[2] G. Lichtenstein, and T. Monroe-White, “Entrepreneurial mindset assessment reviews,” 2016. Available: https://venturewell.org/wp-content/uploads/EMAR-v1-1.pdf[3] S. Zappe, “Avoiding construct confusion: An attribute-focused approach to assessing
REACT is currently limited to teachers within the state, we feel the best way to reachother states is by sharing our model with other research institutions around the country. We arecurrently working with a research group at Cornell University to implement a similar annualworkshop that will serve their region. 10References[1] A. King, “From Sage on the Stage to Guide on the Side,” Coll. Teach., 2010.[2] C. Papanastasiou, “School, teaching and family influence on student attitudes toward science: Based on TIMSS data for Cyprus,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 71–86, Jan. 2002.[3] J. Osborne, S. Simon, and S
Summary and Future DirectionThe authors piloted a ND EPSCoR NATURE bridge camp at TMCC during the summer of 2019.The authors wanted to prepare participants for college in a manner that would also get themexcited about and interested in pursuing a STEM degree and career. The structure of the campconsisted of face-to-face sessions and three independent projects aimed at developing a mindsetthat will ultimately help participants succeed in college. Each independent project built uponknowledge gained during that face-to-face sessions and previous independent project(s). Theauthors believe this systematic process of progressively giving the participants moreresponsibility and less instruction over the course of the camp helped to promote the self
community was purposefully expanded to include center and university, parents andwomen of color in STEM to further improve the self-efficacy of the girls [27], [28].MethodologyThis research is part of a larger exploratory, longitudinal, 2-year mixed methods study. Theinitial phase was focused on unveiling areas of challenge in student perception, CT thinkingpractices, and STEM +CT integration. Student voice was optimized to help refine and evolve theintegration of STEM and the CT activities. CT thinking practices were pulled by the universityresearch team from Weintrop et al.’s Taxonomy of CT [15]. Those practices include DataCollection, Data Creation, Understanding a System as a Whole, Understanding the RelationshipBetween Parts of a System
/working-papers (accessed October, 2023).[10] C. S. Stocco, R. H. Thompson, J. M. Hart, and H. L. Soriano, "Improving the interview skills of college students using behavioral skills training," Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 495-510, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.385.[11] J. Akpan and C. Notar, "How to write a professional knockout resume to differentiate yourself," College Student Journal, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 880-891, 2012.[12] S. B. Knouse, "Impressions of the resume: The effects of applicant education, experience, and impression management," Journal of Business and Psychology, vol. 9, pp. 33-45, 1994.[13] I. Hunt, R. Taylor, and W. Oberman, "Advisory board engagement
, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis," Reviewof Educational Research, vol. 69, pp. 21-51, 1999.[8] ABET, "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022-2023," [Online]. Available:https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2022-2023/.[9] J. Mott and S. Peuker, "Achieving High Functioning Teams Using Team Based Learning inFlipped Classrooms," Paper presented at the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Seattle, Washington, 2015, doi: 10.18260/p.23482.[10] D.R. Bacon, K.A. Stewart, and W.S. Silver, "Lessons from the best and worst student teamexperiences: How a teacher can make the difference," Journal of Management Education, vol.23, pp. 467-488, 1999.[11
Network (KEEN).References1 Van den Beemt, A., MacLeod, M., Van der Veen, J., Van de Ven, A., van Baalen, S.,Klaassen, R., and Boon, M.: ‘Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision,teaching, and support’, Journal of Engineering Education, 2020, 109, (3), pp. 508-5552 Hernández-de-Menéndez, M., Vallejo Guevara, A., Tudón Martínez, J.C., HernándezAlcántara, D., and Morales-Menendez, R.: ‘Active learning in engineering education. A reviewof fundamentals, best practices and experiences’, International Journal on Interactive Design andManufacturing (IJIDeM), 2019, 13, (3), pp. 909-9223 Makki, B.I., Feng, F., Waqar, M.A., and Adhikari, I.M.: ‘Work Readiness, Decision-Making Self-Efficacy, and Career Exploration among