, Indiana. As a result of these collaborations, some of her articles have been published in important journals of her field of ex- pertise and her article entitled ”1-N-alkyl-3 methykimidazolium ionic liquids as neat lubricant additives in steel-aluminum contacts” has been named one of the TOP TEN CITED articles published in the area in the last five years (2010). Since she started working at the National Technical Institute for the Deaf, Patricia has been actively involved in the field of deaf access technology and education. Page 23.832.1Ms. Kate N. Leipold, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE)Mr
Education, 2013 iPads in the Engineering Classroom – Boon or Bane?Introduction As iPads and similar touch-screen devices continue to flood the market, engineeringprograms are seeking to integrate these platforms into student education. With total marketpenetration of perhaps 125 million iPads sold to date and nearly half a billion smartphones (allbrands) shipped in 2011 alone1 for a total of just over 1 billion smartphone users currentlyholding active accounts worldwide2, the transition to highly-mobile touch screen computing isupon us. Further, the Pew Internet and American Life Project estimates that 66% of thosebetween 18 and 29 years old own smartphones, with the likelihood of ownership increasing withhigher incomes3
controls for IPv6 (ACLs, Policies, etc) Observe and mitigate first hop security threats Implement control plane protection mechanisms Observe and mitigate security threats introduced by transition mechanisms Secure IPv6 networking (routing protocols, DNS, and MPLS) Configure IPsec for IPv6Remote Lab environmentHands-on lab experience for the students was an essential element of this course. In theliterature there are numerous examples showing that lab experience plays a critical role instudent learning.1, 2, 18 Because this course is taught completely online, the labs must be eitherremote equipment or simulation. Literature shows that simulation software can limit studentcuriosity and experimentation.6 Therefore, to allow
help characterize relational learning, an attempt is made in Figure 1 to show variousmodes of learning in an arrangement that shows both hierarchy and overlap or common ground.For example, collaborative learning is a type of relational learning, and cooperative learning is asubset of collaborative learning. In terms of partial overlap, experiential and self-reflectivelearning has some aspects in common with relational learning (especially when consideringrelationship with self), but also has aspects that are distinct from relational learning. A note ismade in the figure that all learning is contextual, so the relationship of the learner with thecontext of the learning situation applies in all learning modes. Further, this diagram is
college for women. The Picker Engineering Program wasestablished in 1999 and is the first accredited engineering program at a women’s institution inthe United States. The program decided to seek funding for a job shadow program based on theresearch reported above suggesting that job shadowing might be one way to increase interest inengineering and on the following factors: 1. Students at Smith do not declare a major until the end of their sophomore year, thus providing a perfect opportunity for students to explore engineering and for recruiting students who might not have otherwise chosen engineering. 2. Students enrolled in Picker Engineering courses have consistently reported in surveys administered by the department
taught six different biology and engineering courses. Dr. Ankeny aspires to employ student engagement strategies in the context of biomedical engineering education in the future. Page 23.837.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Just-in-Time-Teaching with Interactive Frequent Formative Feedback (JiTTIFFF or JTF) for Cyber Learning in Core Materials CoursesAbstractIn this new NSF-sponsored Type 2 TUES (Transformation of Undergraduate Engineering inSTEM) project, we are using engagement, assessment, and reflection tools developed in asuccessful CCLI Phase 1 project and are
end of the Summer AcademyTPD program. Table 1 shows the number of participants at both sites by year.Table 1. Number of Participants of Summer Academy by Year and Location Group Year Total National On-site 2008 36 29 88 2009 40 36 96 2010 47 30 101 2011 34 50* 84 Total 157 145 302 *Note. Participation was mandatory.C. Survey DesignThe Summer Academy evaluation survey was designed to evaluate teachers’ satisfaction with theengineering TPD, including their attitudes and beliefs about engineering TPD and potentialapplication of their learning when they attempt to
students. As part of moving forward,however, there is a need to understand elements of the existing NSF-funded resources that havealready achieved positive outcomes. Thus, the purpose of this study is to identify and highlightkey elements of existing cyberlearning resources with compelling results. An explanatorysequential mixed methods research design1 was used to address the follow research questions: 1. How many cyberlearning resources have been highlighted among NSF reports over the past 10 years? Where do they fit within a cyberlearning taxonomy? What are the emerging opportunities? 2. What are some of the keys aspects of a subset of cyberlearning resources with compelling results
filterswith the help of local construction workers, and worked with two local social workers on healtheducation programs. Spanish and English were spoken on this trip. Student members whospoke and locals translated for non-Spanish speakers.Data Analysis Stages of Research and Analysis: 1. Develop list of key areas of student development based on literature and documents 2. Code first round of data 3. Draw preliminary conclusions 4. Cross check conclusions with second set of data 5. Present secondary conclusions Page 23.840.6 Table 1: Stages of Study Research and
approach is touse sustainable engineering to motivate students from a wide range of engineering disciplines toacquire problem-solving and programming skills.Although inspiration for the curriculum is drawn from topics in sustainable engineering, ourcurrent effort emphasizes solar energy for its potential to be become a low cost energyproduction technology due to its steadily rising efficiencies. The Shockley-Queisser limit putsthe theoretical efficiency of a p-n junction silicon solar cell at 33.7%1 while the highest reportedefficiency today is at 27.6%2. However, the efficiency of more complex multi-junctionconcentrator solar cells is around 44%2. While solar energy most likely won’t completely replaceconventional energy sources, it is an
ofPSpice that would be used in the prelabdesign, analysis, and simulations; tutorial on ameasurement technique, and a tutorial on afacet of MATLAB that is used in the post-labanalysis of results. The overview of theexperiment module is always posted while the Fig. 1: List of learning online modulesother modules are included as needed. In created for students in the second circuits lab Page 23.842.3addition, links to the report template and course and posted on the course Scholar site.instructions on how students will validate their experiments are also included. A list of themodules that were made for two experiments used in the Fall 2012 semester is
on specimens that are subjected to relatively low stress situations where the cyclicdeformation is entirely elastic. Cyclic loading in the plastic region results in low cycle count tofailure. Low cycle fatigue is a strain based theory that better represents the behavior of materialssubjected to cyclic loading resulting in plastic deformation. Low cycle fatigue theory takes intoaccount both the elastic and plastic strain, while high cycle fatigue theory ignores plasticity. Atypical strain-life plot is seen in Figure 1, with the elastic strain (Δεe), plastic strain (Δεp), andtotal strain(Δε) curves shown, along with a line marking the transition life, where the fatiguefailure mode changes from elastic-dominant to plastic-dominant
: Page 23.844.2Fig.1 Block diagram showing various components of a solar photovoltaic systemThe laboratory activities are to correspond to each or a combination of the topics and to beculminated by the design and testing of a stand-alone/grid connected PV system. Laboratoryactivities will include simulation, modeling, and experimentation using commercial size panels.The PV voltage of the panels mounted on building rooftop has been fed directly to thelaboratory. This will provide a realistic learning experience and facilitate experimentation undervarying insolation and weather conditions.3. COURSE MODULE DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIESA comprehensive research on the published books and materials was undertaken to examine thecurrent state of available
, and the students were encouraged toreflect, both in writing and orally.The overall academic learning outcomes for the student successfully completing this EngineeringMaterials Laboratory course are summarized by the following:1. Achieve a basic grasp of atomic structure and bonding incorporating crystal structure and crystal defects, including documentation and symbols.2. Demonstrate technical competence controlling material dislocation and strengthening, including utilizing phase diagrams incorporating alloys.3. Apply fundamental rules, laws and criteria for implementing phase transformation/heat treatment for material selection for design and manufacturing.4. Demonstrate the ability to explain and apply fundamental mechanical
students at the University of NorthCarolina at Charlotte. The versatility and capability of many industrial PLCs though comes at theexpense of accessibility, with a programming environment that can be intimidating for studentswith limited programming experience (Figure 1) or students accustomed to languages like C++and Python1. To overcome this intimidation with students from mechanical engineering orfacilities management backgrounds, students were led through a common task using a selectionof software and hardware that was believed to be more accessible, to build their skills andconfidence prior to programming with RSLogix 5000. Page 23.846.3Figure
underrepresented groups to itsranks”. The guiding principles of the NAE report also include keeping, “pace withtechnological innovations”, and expanding our capacity to appropriately contribute to an,“increasingly diverse and multidisciplinary” global community. More recently, in February2012, the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology published a reportthat included three imperatives: 1) Improve the first two years of STEM education incollege, 2) Provide all students with the tools to excel, and 3) Diversify pathways to STEMdegrees (President's Council 2012).Without a doubt, these are challenging goals under any circumstances. Our current divisivepolitical climate and uncertain economic outlook make this an even more daunting task
Conversations: How to Discuss What Matters Most is the basis for thisparticular aspect of the Leadership Academy.5 Using the work of Stone et al, we introducestudents to the notion of “3 Conversations” as a way to show them the context and emotions thatunderlie most difficult conversations. We also ensure that students have a hands-on experiencewith this material, since the learning mode emphasized heavily at Rose-Hulman is hands-on andpractical.First, we provide a general introduction to difficult conversations by summarizing the mainprinciples of the text. In particular we focus on the notion of each conversation being “threeconversations”: 1) the “what happened” conversation, 2) the feelings conversation, and 3) theidentity conversation. [5] We
software program as that solution. Students were not expected topartition the solution in to multiple code files, but they are to use structured forms in dividing thesolution into distinct and coherent functions with data passed among them as parameter values.This is straight forward in both C and MATLAB. However, MATLAB allows multiple resultvalues to be passed back directly whereas one has to use data pointers in C to pass back multiplevalues.Table 1 below lists the course topics and the relevant objectives while stating whether MATLABwas discussed with regard to that topic or not. Whenever MATLAB was contrasted, its usage inwriting code was assessed (in most cases) in a homework, a quiz, or in an exam to a lesser extentthan its C counterpart
will target rural Michigan teachers located northern LowerPeninsula.”We aimed to: 1. establish a unique collaborative partnership between Central Michigan University (CMU) entities such as engineering faculty; Science/Mathematics/Technology Center (SMTC); Page 23.850.4 and Center for Excellence in Education (CEIE); together with Science and Mathematics Program Improvement (SAMPI) of Western Michigan University, and high school STEM in-service and pre-service teachers in the northern lower peninsula of Michigan; 2. provide a STEM-based platform on which high school STEM teachers gain exposure to basic engineering
students took both the pre-course andpost-course leadership principles survey. The goal of this survey was to understand how studentsperceive their learning of characteristics related to leadership. Additionally, a studentexpectations assessment, whereby students were asked what three different leadership attributesthey would like to develop, was collected from the same student class cohorts. The five mostfrequently listed student-reported expectation attributes were: (1) confidence, (2) communicationability, (3) trust in team members, (4) ability to inspire-motivate, and (5) ability to exercisesound judgment. The average student response on the leadership principles survey from pre-course to post-course for all five student-identified learning
related material such as class notes, grades, homework, tests, etc. usingMEEG 2303: Introduction to Materials as a learning vehicle. Common pedagogical techniquesincluded communication and presentation skills, body language and tonal variation forengagement, preparation of information rich slides and explanation which helped the graduatestudent and postdoc provide a spherical learning experience for students. In this pilot program,the mentees learnt five key aspects of modern teaching: (1) dedication and empathy towardsstudents, (2) engaging and exciting the students in the class for the subject matter and self-motivated learning after-class, (3) giving and receiving constructive feedback, (4) learning howto learn and teach, and (5) connecting
SmartSurfaces showed significant increases in communication, creativethinking and critical thinking over the other courses. Crisca Bierwert, Kirsten Olds, and JamesP. Barber documented the results as part of their work for the University’s Center for Researchon Learning and Teaching (CRLT).12 The survey elicited students’ self-reports of their learningthrough question sets with rating scales. The students were asked to compare the skills theydeveloped in MLTT-funded courses with their learning in other University of Michigan courses.Invitations to participate in the online survey were sent to 634 individuals. Overall, 417participated across the 14 courses, for an aggregate response rate of 66%. Table 1 (below)compares the percentage of participants in
is currently the chair and professor of the Department of Engineering Technology, with a joint appointment in the Department of Biomedical Engineering. Previous to that he served as Associate Dean, Undergraduate Studies for the Newark College of Engineering of NJIT. His research in industry was in the area of pacemakers and defibrillation, and his research at Medtronic Inc led to five patents. He was a principal investigator for a three year, $1 million NSF grant entitled Medibotics: The merging of medicine, robotics and IT, and was a co-principal investigator for a $2.5 million grant on pre-engineering workforce enhancement from the New Jersey Commission on Higher Education, as well as a principal investigator
findings have been discussed as well.1. IntroductionThis paper presents a recent effort of the authors in comparing learning performance of studentsbetween two universities using course outcomes. One of the authors taught a graduate-levelcourse at both University A (UA) (in 2010) and University B (UB) (in 2011). The course taughtis Time Series Analysis, which is a typical course in many engineering programs acrossAmerican universities1-6. The course intends to give students an opportunity to apply the timeseries techniques to the modeling, analysis and forecasting of real-world physical systems. Onlygraduate students were allowed to enroll in the course at the two universities. The Colleges ofEngineering of these two universities have different
, clamps, trees, desk chairs, and other objects.In fall 2012, the pilot year of study implementation, the following two research questions wereamong those examined: 1. Does the use of body-based vs. traditional examples affect student confidence? 2. Does the use of body-based vs. traditional examples affect student conceptual knowledge?This paper presents the overall methodology and logistics for the study in its pilot year includingdetails on approach implementation, examples of active learning lesson plans of both Body-Based and Traditional recitation tracks, and preliminary findings based on gross comparison ofpre-/post- concept inventory and selected attitudinal survey categories.BackgroundThe details of course structure as well
of a student learning experience and therefore what toemphasize in a hierarchical order once critical learning outcomes are identified. In Principlesamong the most important learning outcomes are the ability to recognize entrepreneurialopportunities and to communicate the benefits of those opportunities to others whether they arecustomers, partners, employees or investors. In the model of Wiggins and McTighe learningoutcomes are organized into three levels of learning importance: 1. enduring understandings, 2.important to know insights, and 3. good to know information. These learning outcomes establishwhat the student is expected to know or be able to do as a result of participating in the Principlescourse. Pelligrino’s assessment
. The UCAVs would then glide to landing. The air breathingsupersonic-combustion ramjet hypersonic weapons would quickly accelerate to collide with anyincoming warheads. Teams of two students each were formed. Weekly reports updating theteam’s progress were expected.Performance parameters studied were the totalweight, range, endurance, maximum speeds,critical Mach number, lift to drag ratio, serviceceiling, rate of climb, turn rates and radius, anddrag estimates. Figure 3 illustrates the differenttypes of vehicles involved in the design is shownin The carrier aircraft is likely to be much biggerthan pictured, and powered by turbofan engines. Figure 1: Schematic illustration
Bhopal in 1984) that drew public attention to the ethical duties of engineersand scientists, propelled vigorous writing of professional codes of conduct, andestablished the academic discipline of engineering ethics.1-2 As a growing number ofdocumented real-world cases suggests, engineers and scientists who become alienatedfrom their public clients, are also much more vulnerable to self-interest, self-delusion,and institutional pressures that can contribute to unethical conduct and suboptimalprofessional decisions.3-8The growing multi-cultural and international dimensions of engineering and science;9-10an increasing reliance on interdisciplinary, inter-organizational, and team-basedcollaborations;11-12 rising competition in the technological
ofundergraduates enrolled in ECE was 399, as shown in Figure 1. 261 of these students weremajoring in Electrical Engineering and 138 were majoring in Computer Engineering. Thesecond plot on figure 1 is the ASEE national ECE undergraduate enrollment data between 2004and 2011. 2012 data was not available at the time of publishing this paper. Corrective Action Plan InitiatedFigure 1: ECE undergraduate enrollment over the last nine reporting periods.When analyzing the enrollment increases for OU-ECE, the ECE enrollment numbers from theASEE data is used as a baseline. The ASEE data shows that national ECE undergraduateenrollment declined from 102,012 to 81,501 between 2004 and 2008. This 20.1% decrease waslower
about changeprocesses and change agents. A synopsis of these discussions is provided in Table 1. Table 1. Synopsis of Change Agents Change Agent Characteristics Aliases Raises awareness among people, find connections to what’s already Mr. A being done Communicates vision to develop awareness Possesses the mental complexity to deal with challenges of change, Mr. Am understanding of “big picture” Facilitates change leading to capacity to deal with social complexity Conscious connection to world as participatory