Dr. Stephanie J. Jones is an associate professor in the higher education program at Texas Tech University. She provides the leadership for the online Ed.D. program in higher education that is focused on college and university administration. The program is designed to produce qualified leaders who have the skills to solve problems in practice and to lead institutions of higher learning. Her research agenda includes access and equity within organizational structures, culture and climate of working environments, women in leadership, and women in STEM. Her research is applied across various environmental contexts, including community colleges and research universities. Dr. Jones currently serves on the editorial
tenured full professor. CSULB is a teaching-intensive institution and thus, he has taught classes at different levels from introduction to programming and data structures; to junior level classes in database design; senior level classes on database, web development, and senior projects; and finally to graduate classes in database systems. In 2014, Dr. Monge joined a team at Google that created NCWIT’s EngageCSEdu, an online living col- lection of peer-reviewed teaching instruments that use research-based techniques that retain and engage students, particularly effective in broadening participation in computing. Dr. Monge’s research inter- ests have evolved over time. Through his participation in an NSF sponsored
-economic/socio-political landscape over the past several years has impacted theseprograms and will offer revised best practices and recommendations on expandingAS/BE programs.IntroductionTwo-year schools are attractive to many students who are identified as a member of anunderrepresented group (e.g., women, Black, Latino, Native American) in science,technology, engineering and math (STEM) careers because they offer lower tuition costs,regularly scheduled remedial courses, an array of support services, supplementalinstruction and are generally located near the student’s home [1-2]. Many of thesestudents seek to continue their education, aspiring to attain a bachelor degree at a four-year institution and some ultimately seek to earn a graduate
discussionsduring P&T Smarts gatherings on various issues confronting faculty, engage AALANA facultyin deep discussion about smart strategies for attaining promotion and tenure, and help develop asense of common purpose and support.P&T SMARTSP&T SMARTS is an outgrowth of and subsumed the WoC Connectivity Series P&T Smartsinitiative. It employs a multi-faceted strategic approach that provides advice, guidance, andfeedback, as well as workshops on identifying and using research-based best practices to helpAALANA WoC navigate their careers. P&T SMARTS eases the process by building acommunity of support around issues of promotion and tenure and by promoting strategicthinking on these issues that help participants navigate their careers
). Her research studies the synthesis, characterization, environmental impact, and human health impact of optically quantum dots. Denise is currently a National Science Foundation AGEP Fellow, a Meyerhoff Graduate Fellow, and a research member of the Center for Sustainable Nanotechnology. Prior to her time at UMBC, Denise earned a Bachelor of Science in Chemistry and a Bachelor of Science in Forensic Science from the University of New Haven in West Haven, Connecticut in May 2015. Contact information: dwill3@umbc.edu.Mrs. Yarazeth Medina, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Yarazeth Medina is a USM PROMISE AGEP Program Coordinator for Graduate Student Development and Postdoctoral Affairs. She earned her BA in
persistence in an engineering major at a university. Despite current researchthat identifies best practices for STEM interventions that support the formation of youngwomen’s STEM identity (AAUW, 2010), a persistent research gap exists on how women’sexperiences affect their decision to enter and persist in engineering. Increased knowledge aboutwomen’s K-14 experiences, including the supports that may have influenced persistence, willprovide additional insight into how to construct an environment that encourages young women toenter and persist in engineering majors.This mixed-methods sequential study utilized a survey and a focus group to provide insight intofemale students’ feelings of self-efficacy and perceptions of the academic, social, and
settings such as summer camps, military experiences, and extra-curricular activities. Other research interests involve validation of CFD models for aerospace applications as well as optimizing efficiency of thermal-fluid systems.Dr. Shannon Ciston, University of California, Berkeley Shannon Ciston is a Lecturer and Director of Undergraduate Education in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of California, Berkeley. Dr. Ciston holds degrees in chemical engineering from Northwestern University (PhD) and Illinois Institute of Technology (BS). She teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in technical communications and applied pedagogy, and conducts engineering education research.Ms
, 2015; Whitmire et al, 2015)). However, they also have concerns regarding the valueof data-sharing (Borgman, 2015). Several studies have revealed that disciplinary differences indata management requirements are significant (Weller and Monroe-Gulick, 2014; Akers andDoty, 2013; Kim and Stanton, 2016)). This is a major concern in designing a one-size-fits-alldata management scheme for researchers. It is also clear from the literature that faculty have notyet significantly changed their data management practices to conform to federal grant agencyand publisher mandates (Whitmire et al, 2015, Diekema et al, 2014). Overall, these observeddata management practices present many challenges for libraries when setting up datamanagement services and
existing PFF programs and their components in order to identify programcommonalities and differences, and 2) report on the benchmarks and outcomes serving as keyindicators of program success. To do so presupposes the existence of data gathered, extracted,and analyzed with the intent to report, on an individual program basis, program impact and/orintervention efficacy. The paucity of such data proved to be a barrier to addressing thesequestions in their entirety; not only for this current work, but for other work seeking to similarlyassess trends in future faculty development program design, outcomes, and impact. Theprevalent literature tends to report on operational best practices or provide anecdotal evidenceregarding the benefit of PFF programs
adepartment head or a Dean. The NSF call says that this is to “establish institutionalaccountability.” For change to occur, it is critical to have someone in administration who cansupport change or provide leverage. An expert in engineering education or computer scienceeducation research is needed--this person should be familiar with the literature in this area and beable to ground the project plan within that literature. For example, have similar ideas been triedat other institutions? What are best practices? An expert in social science must be included--thisperson could be from a number of different departments including sociology or education. Thisperson should be familiar with the literature on organizational change. They need to be able toadvise
Paper ID #18394Peer-based Gamification Products Critiquing: Two Case studies in Engineer-ing EducationJingwen(Jess) Li, PSU Jingwen Li is a current PhD candidate in Human Factors at IE department, Penn State University. She graduated from Beihang University, Beijing, with her thesis working on upper limb dynamic modeling applied in extravehicular activities considering spacesuit effects. Her research focus now includes model- ing cognitive aspects of human in a dynamic information system, maintaining vigilance through physical activity in during monitoring task, and applying gamification to enhance engineering education.Mr
both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University,she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis.From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement ofTeaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designingfor the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2011 Dr. Sheppard was named as co-PI of a national NSFinnovation center (Epicenter), and leads an NSF program at Stanford on summer research experiences forhigh school teachers. Her industry experiences includes engineering positions at Detroit’s ”Big Three:”Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation, and
and Social Inquiry, Sociology of Education, and Gender and Society) on topics including the legal profession, intellectual property, and constitutional law.Dr. Roberta Rincon, Society of Women Engineers Dr. Rincon joined the Society of Women Engineers in February 2016 as the Manager of Research, where she oversees the organization’s research activities around female engineers from elementary through col- lege and into the workforce. With over 15 years of experience in higher education administration, includ- ing as a Senior Research and Policy Analyst for The University of Texas System, her focus has been on understanding the factors that impact student success and influencing the policies that support students
thetraditional content of a culture and assimilates its knowledge, practices, and values(KPV). Under such definition, ABET outcomes were transferred to a set of culturalconstructs based on the content of the first-year engineering program. A depiction of suchcultural constructs or traits is portrayed in Figure 1.Figure 1. Schematic of outcomes from the course organization for the first-yearengineering course. II. Research Design, Analysis and ResultsA. The open-ended analysisThe primary purpose of the open-ended study was to analyze student perspectives on howthe process of engineering enculturation is occurring according to what is taught in afirst-year engineering course. The three open-ended questions from a pre-survey thatwere
Paper ID #20248Lean Six Sigma Case Study within a Public School DistrictMs. Emily M Salmon, Mississippi State University Emily Salmon is a recent graduate of Mississippi State University (MSU) with a bachelor’s in Industrial and Systems Engineering. She is a Research Engineer for MSU’s Institute for Systems Engineering Research (ISER) located in Vicksburg, MS. Her current research involves lean six sigma practices and applications, manufacturability, and modeling and simulations. She received her Six Sigma Black Belt from MSU’s CAVS Extension Center in June 2016 and is currently pursuing her Masters of Engineering at MSU
experience in areas of Automotive and Systems Engineering.Dr. Lisa Elanna Burris, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA Lisa Burris is an assistant professor of Civil Engineering at the Ohio State University. Dr. Burris’ exper- tise lies in the areas of cement and concrete optimization, durability of construction materials, forensic evaluation of structural and material deficiencies, and infrastructure construction and repair best practices. Dr. Burris holds a B.S. in Architectural Engineering and M.S. in Civil Engineering from Kansas State University, a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin, and has over a decade of experience in construction materials research
solarand wind energies and recycling and reusing of engineering materials.Mark JanzenHe graduated from Cowley County Community College in Spring 2012 with an Associate ofArts Degree. He is a BS student in Mechanical Engineering at WSU. He is expecting to join thegraduate school for his further studies in renewable energy and other related technologies.Dr. Eylem AsmatuluDr. Asmatulu is currently an Engineering Educator in the Department of MechanicalEngineering at WSU and actively involving in teaching, research, and scholarship activities inthe same department. She received her PhD degree from the Department of Industrial andManufacturing Engineering at WSU in May 2013, which was mainly focused on the “Life CycleAnalysis of the Advanced Materials
Human Services at the University of Michigan-Dearborn. He earned his PhD in Learning Technologies at the University of Michigan. Prior to that, he taught elementary school for six years. Stein is interested in the enhancement of learning environments through the integration of technology and enjoys working with preservice and practicing teachers to learn about how this can be done more effectively. He has conducted research on the impact of research-based professional development on the integration of technology in K-12 classrooms and explored the use of e-portfolios in teaching and learning with undergraduate and graduate students.Dr. Marouane Kessentini, University of Michigan-Dearborn Dr. Marouane Kessentini is an
. Previously, Dr. Traum was an assistant professor at the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE), one of the top-ten undergraduate-serving engineering universities in the U.S. Dr. Traum coordinated MSOE’s first crowd-funded senior design project. He also co-founded with students EASENET, a start- up renewable energy company to commercialize waste-to-energy biomass processors. Dr. Traum began his academic career as a founding faculty member in the Mechanical & Energy Engineer- ing Department at the University of North Texas - Denton where he established a successful, externally- funded researcher incubator that trained undergraduates to perform experimental research and encouraged matriculation to graduate school
length of commitment. Service learning is built upon a foundational educational theory ofconstructivism where students make practical connections between what they have learned intheir engineering classrooms, what they have experienced in the past, and the service projectitself. In addition, it enhances student motivation because students feel that they are making apositive difference in the world beyond their engineering studies (Lima and Oakes, 2013).This paper reviews the co-authors experiences with service learning including designing andbuilding playgrounds for elementary schools (the 33rd was built during ASEE's 2016conference), technical consulting service to a neighborhood impacted by local hazardous wastesites, a rooftop rainwater
. Barakat is currently the immediate past chair of the ASEE Ethics Division.Dr. David Ramirez, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Dr. David Ramirez is a tenured Associate Professor of the Department of Environmental Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville (TAMUK). He is the graduate coordinator of the doctoral program in environmental engineering. He has served as the Director of the Center for Research Excellence in Sci- ence and Technology – Research on Environmental Sustainability in Semi-Arid Coastal Areas, Interim Executive Director of the Eagle Ford Shale Center for Research, Education and Outreach, and program coordinator of several TAMUK’s education programs including the NSF-Science, Technology
Professor of English in the Department of English at Carnegie Mellon. His current research interests include pedagogy of communication and design for students and professionals in the technology/engineering disciplines, and computer-aided rhetorical analysis. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Making the Invisible Visible in Writing Classrooms: An Approach to Increasing Textual Awareness using Computer-Aided Rhetorical AnalysisIntroductionWriting requires countless composing decisions that are typically beyond the writer’s consciousgrasp. For students, writing can feel like a process that they have little control over, and a skillthat only a certain few possess. Much of the skill in being
participation in engineering education. He is a Research Scientist and Lecturer in the School of Engineering at Stanford University and teaches the course ME310x Product Management and ME305 Statistics for Design Researchers. Mark has extensive background in consumer products management, having managed more than 50 con- sumer driven businesses over a 25-year career with The Procter & Gamble Company. In 2005, he joined Intuit, Inc. as Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer and initiated a number of consumer package goods marketing best practices, introduced the use of competitive response modeling and ”on- the-fly” A|B testing program to qualify software improvements. Mark is the Co-Founder and Managing
increase academic persistence and therefore graduation rates[3]. A three-year NSF funded program is supporting the development and delivery of animmersive five-day workshop at each institution. The workshop is offered the week before thefall semester for incoming transfer students in engineering. Howard University and NMSU areworking together to develop the workshops. However, each institution is structuring and shapingthe workshop in a manner that the instructors believe fit best with their respective institutions.The focus of this paper are the workshops offered at NMSU during the first two years, thequalitative effect it has made to date on the students who participated in it, and how NMSU plansto move forward.The first workshop at NMSU was
form of an essay, including the achievements, learning experience, challenges faced,cultural and professional experiences, networking, the impact on their development asprofessionals, and the opportunities for improvement. This document is submitted to the e-portfolio at the end of the project. The faculty advisors will collect information such asopportunities for improvement and best practices to be applied in following projects.Resultant Outcomes of Cross-Border CollaborationThe ultimate goal is to provide the student with the opportunity to develop a project thatincludes the application of skills, knowledge, and techniques, concepts in the design andmanufacturing, learned through the engineering program coursework, in a
part of a larger NSF-funded STEM + Computing project, participating teachersexplored a pilot unit that uses engineering and computer science to infuse computational thinkinginto the teaching of linear functions in secondary algebra. Using a design-based researchframework that intertwines innovative learning environments and the development of theories oflearning, the research team engaged teachers as learners, classroom leaders, and collaborators ininquiry [3] [4]. This collaborative approach heightens the relevance of the designed interventionto teachers’ practice while also yielding key insights for research. In the case of the teacher institute, focusing on dispositions provided an anchor thathelped teachers navigate the ambiguity of
TechnologyTECH 12000 – “Design Thinking in Technology”, is a freshman level survey course designed todevelop a students’ perspective and enhance their skills in living and working in a technologicalsociety while introducing them to Purdue Polytechnic. Two sections of TECH 12000 wereutilized by the researchers to recruit volunteers for this study.Originally, the instructors, who are also the authors of this paper, planned to introduce the topicof VR to the class by digital presentation (e.g. PowerPoint). However, from experience anddiscussions they decided that for someone to fully understand and appreciate what currentimmersive VR is, they must experience it first-hand. This idea and the need to assistadministration with classroom technology procurement
Engineering Communications Program (ECP) have developed a sophomore tosenior, communication-across-the-curriculum plan, called the “MAE/ECP Initiative,” to meet theneeds of students, faculty, the college, and industry alike in their quest to heighten the pre-professional skills of graduating students. At its core, the partnership encourages the students'development of communicative self-efficacy in meeting the complex communicative demandsrelated to performing technical work in mechanical and aerospace engineering. This paperdiscusses the pedagogical framework, the research paradigm, the foundational concepts(engineering communication: communicative practice, context, communicative design, andengineering identity), communication modalities (written
devices, an optional 4-day course on engineering of musicalinstruments, and an opportunity for students to get together and speak about their experiencesthrough guided storytelling. We will report on the results of these programs at a later date.BibliographyASEE (2014). Going the Distance: Best Practices and Strategies for Retaining Engineering,Engineering Technology, and Computing Students. https://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/college-profiles.Alon, S. (2005). Model mis-specification in assessing the impact of financial aid on academicoutcomes. Research in Higher Education, 46(1), 109–125.Alon, S., & Tienda, M. (2005). Assessing the “mismatch” hypothesis: Differences in collegegraduation rates by institutional
encouraged to draw from their own junior and senior level coursework(especially their senior design projects) to help students gain perspective, and learn how to applyfundamental laws to more difficult and complex circuits. The purpose was to help thesefreshman students understand why EE 302 is a foundational course in the curriculum, and SIleaders participated in weekly professional development meetings to discuss best practices indirecting student learning of both the content and study skills. Leaders maintained detailed lessonplans and were asked to identify content and study skill objectives for each week’s lesson. FourSI sessions were offered weekly and efforts were made to ensure that the sessions did notconflict with lecture or lab timesIII