single umbrella. The first two years of thecurriculum associated with the ME and MET programs are nearly identical, providing flexibilityto students who might be unsure of their career paths. The second cohort of MET students isgraduating in May 2014.The purpose of this paper is to provide a description of the collaboration between the E and ETprograms, particularly highlighting the curricula, and how a partnership such as this might beused as a template and extended into other venues.IntroductionColorado Mesa University (CMU), formerly known as Mesa State College, and the University ofColorado Boulder (CU-Boulder) entered into a partnership in February 2008 to deliver amechanical engineering (ME) program in its entirety in Grand Junction
results collected during the internship are analyzed, written-up, and presented for the thesis.Although this is an ideal arrangement in many respects, when the subject matter is competition-sensitive, it can place obstacles in the path of student publication. We have reached a workablesolution by embargoing select thesis publication on a year-by-year basis with companyoversight. PSPE students enroll in a seminar that has been designed to better prepare them forcorporate culture and expectations. Two of the PSPE related faculty had extensive careers withTI prior to joining the faculty at TTU. Their insights and experiences are conveyed during theseminar. In addition, students who have already interned present their experiences to the newstudents
the POs were one female senior and one male junior; both wereAfrican American and ranked in the top 5% of their respective cohorts (the GPA requirement toparticipate in ISEAmP is 3.0 or higher). Both possessed great ‘people skills,’ had previousinternship experience, registered with Career Services, and held leadership positions in theInstitute of Industrial Engineers (IIE), Alpha Pi Mu (ISE's Honor Society), Society of WomenEngineers (SWE), and the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE). Active participation inorganizations or professional societies are a requirement to serve as an ambassador in ISEAmP.Training.The Undergraduate Advisor and Department Chair met with the POs weekly for anhour. The POs kept a journal of all meetings and
, academic status anddepressed psychology. A moderate percentage of students place of residence. The questions were fairly simple and theare affected by these emotional issues, because of not being details provided by the respondents were confidential, thisable to understand the meaning of college and significance led to having sincere opinions from the students. However,of a future career [7]. there were factors that limited the research; namely, the survey was within one college which is, the PI, and only aAs we can see, college plays a significant role in number of 39
this study, this paper will examine the subjects and careers, or that it costs more to traineffect of two different types of model building spatial reasoning ability due to the need for moreexercises – student-built physical models and hands-on teaching resources.3,4 Therefore studentsstudent-produced computer graphic 3D models – on arrive in architecture, engineering and all STEM978-1-4799-5233-5/14/$31.00 ©2014 IEEEprograms with little or no exposure to spatial project as more difficult to work with than hands-onvisualization training. Yet they are expected to think models. 7and communicate spatially. The students who dostart our programs with stronger spatial
., Coates, C. W., Johnson, W. M., and McCarthy C., “Pushing the Limit Further: Exposure of High School Senior to Engineering Research, Design and Communication,” Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Southeast Section Conference, Marietta, GA, Apr. 5-7, 2009.11. Takaghaj, S. M., Macnab, C. and Friesen, S., “Inspiring Girls to Pursue Careers in STEM with a Mentor- Supported Robotics Project,” Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, AC 2011 - 1100, Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 26-29, 2011.12. Salzman, N. and Strobel, J., “Motivations and Benefits for College Students Serving as Mentors in a High School Robotics Competition,” Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, AC 2011-2846
high school seniors to college freshmen, the first year of engineering iscritical. In an attempt to facilitate this transition and motivate students as they begin theiracademic careers, many colleges provide summer bridge programs [1]. Summer bridge programsaim to provide incoming students with early contact and enriching experiences believed tofacilitate the acquisition of the skills needed to be successful in college. However, students canhave varying experiences even if they participate in the same activities. Since studies focusing onsummer bridge programs are typically quantitative and primarily focus on academic performanceand retention [2, 3], we know little about how these experiences vary and the many different waysstudents may
the one hand, effective onboardingimproves time to productivity, customer satisfaction, and retention rates[7]. On the other hand,one-third of organizations in the U.S. do not even provide even minimal orientation programs fortheir new employees[8]. Only 30 percent of surveyed global executives reported that they aresatisfied with their employers’ onboarding processes for new hires[9].Faced with less than adequate onboarding support, freshouts often experience anxiety anduncertainty with regard to their roles, tasks, and career prospects in the organization[5]. Whilethe rate of annual freshout engineer turnover in the U.S. is unknown, survey results indicate that,within four years of graduation, 64 percent of graduates remain in engineering
, career services and employers are also reviewed.Lastly, documented feedback from students is also provided that give their perspective on theprogram.Introduction:In the fall of 2011 Lawrence Technological University launched a new Bachelor of Science inRobotics Engineering degree. This degree is currently managed and administered in the A. LeonLinton Department of Mechanical Engineering at Lawrence Tech, and was done so because themechanical engineering department has the most experience at the university with administeringnew engineering programs, has the most faculty involved in robotics research, and was formally Page 24.1195.2asked by the
in a Learn by Doing Mechanical Engineering Program Using Industrial TrainingEquipment............................................................................................................................................................................ 519Student Engagement in STEM Careers Early on through Engineering Clubs at a Middle & HighSchool: Teacher Practices from the Trenches ........................................................................................................ 519Cause of Gordonia amarae-like Foaming in an Incompletely Nitrifying Plant: 3.5 Year Study ........... 520Multidisciplinary Robotic Arm Project
from an Internet sourceand write a reflection summarizing the article and relating it to their careers. We have foundMachine Design magazine’s website12 in particular to be an excellent source for this type ofarticle. For outcome i, we found a white paper on non-linear analysis from SolidWorksCorporation13 to be appropriate. After completing the non-linear analysis assignment, we gavethe students the assignment as follows: In this assignment, we used tabulated results that have been available for many decades along with non-linear software that was not readily available to engineering graduates of only a few years ago. Without a doubt, you will need to keep learning throughout your career. Besides formal classes, trade
, Berkeley in 1974. He has co-authored two textbooks, one monograph and more than 350 technical papers dealing with the design of mechanical, thermal and structural systems; ships and aircraft. His design experience spans the areas of mechanical, aeronautical, structural, and industrial engineering. He has taught courses in engineering design, naval architecture, solid mechanics, operations research and computer science. He has supervised 28 doctoral students and more than 50 master’s students, all of whom are well-placed around the world; 12 of his doctoral students are pursuing highly successful careers in academia. In addition, he has mentored two students, one master’s and one doctoral, who now own several for-profit
’ abilities but challenge them to reach for the top of that range” and 3. “Make connections to students’ interests and intended careers.”4In addition to key preparation for engineering practice, these three practices are also key formotivating students and preparing them for the rigors of studying engineering.The project described in this paper is designed to utilize these three approaches. The topic ofenergy harvesting from ambient renewable sources is very contemporary and of interest to mostbeginning engineering students. The hands on nature of the project and use of LEGO®s are alsoappealing to students. The project is conducted over six weeks using both in and out of classactivities. The diversity of topics, activities and settings utilized in
review Student Educational Plans, to discuss Page 24.529.6academic progress and problem areas, to help devise strategies to improve student performancein their classes, to help students get connected with resources, to provide career counseling, andto help students in completing applications for transfer to a four-year university, as well asapplying for scholarships and internships. At the end of the school year, students are asked toevaluate their faculty mentor to assess the mentor’s ability to help them with their educationaland career endeavors as well as to rate the mentor’s accessibility. Transferring students areinterviewed in depth about
Education, 2014 Paper ID #8971 Mechanical Engineering from Cornell University in 1994. His research interests include product family and product platform design, product dissection, multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO), and addi- tive manufacturing, and he has published over 250 peer-reviewed papers to date. He teaches courses on Product Family Design, Concurrent Engineering, Mechanical Systems Design, and Product Dissection, and he serves as the Director of the Product Realization Minor in the College of Engineering. He is a recipient of the ASEE Fred Merryfield Design Award and a NSF Career Award. He has received
agree at all)- 10 (I agree completely). A. The class topics interested me. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 B. The class focused material on “real-world” applications. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 C. The skills I learned will be applicable to my future career. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 D. The course material was understandable. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 E. Grading procedures were clear. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 F. I received timely and productive feedback on my work. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 G. I knew my grade throughout the semester
career in engineering working with companies such as General Motors, Ford Motor Company and Microsoft, she pursued a Master’s degree in Education from Michigan State University. Later, Araceli completed a PhD in Engineering Education from Tufts University. She is also experienced in education policy and prior to joining the Professoriate, she was Director of Educator Preparation - focusing on STEM education projects at the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. In 2013, she was named Director of the Texas State University LBJ Institute for STEM Education and Re- search. Her research interests include studying the role of engineering as a curricular context and problem- based learning as an instructional
of manual or spreadsheet calculations to verify the resultsfrom simulations in SAP2000. Overall, we believe that from a the perspective of “engineeringculture”, it is important to engage students at the earliest stage possible with the “real” tasks andhabits of engineers and engineering analysts at the earliest possible stage in their careers. Weintend that our project is an advance in eliciting such mature behaviors from students.2. Description of Simulation & Design Projects in MoM We expose students to simulation software and design codes in a sequence of four MoMprojects that are completed in groups of 3-4. The following is a description of each project.Project 1: This project is a re-visitation of a project initiated in the
into freshman-level humanities course and a junior-level technical course allowed students to make connections with what they learned earlier in their college careers. • Not insignificant is the fact that this interdisciplinary project brought together three people from very different academic areas to exchange ideas.The Museum - Contributions to the Synthesis of Art and EngineeringWhile the seeds may have been planted much earlier, the synthesis of art and engineering atMilwaukee School of Engineering formally began in 2001 with the gift of the Eckhart G. Page 24.784.2Grohmann Man at Work collection to the University
misconceptions, the overall benefit of gaining this technicalknowledge will have longer term benefits. The ability of students to familiarize themselves withcurrent technical advances through research will be a valuable tool moving forward in anyengineering career. Figure 6 provides a graphical visualization of the results from Question 3.Figure 6: Question 3 Assessment ResultsQuestion 4: Based on your experiences so far, do you think you have the ability to become anengineer?The goal of this lone first-year engineering course was to introduce students to engineeringdesign and how it utilizes talents from all aspects of a student’s academic repertoire. Manystudents come in apprehensive about their abilities to succeed and this question aimed to
pieces are most effective in influencing,inspiring, and/or guiding our students into their particular pathways of engineering.At NU, the first-year engineering curriculum is fundamentally common for all majors andstudents take an Engineering Design course and a Problem Solving and Computation course in atwo-semester sequence. There is pressure for these two introductory engineering courses toaccomplish a myriad of things alongside content delivery, such as prepare students for thedemands of college, expose them to the engineering majors, provide relevant hands-on and real-world projects, develop algorithmic and critical thinking skills, and get them excited about theirengineering career path. There are a number and variety of projects
courses. It is likely that the synchronous nature of the courseworkhelps to pace the student’s work which in turn leads to course completion. On the other hand, thedirected project is a self-paced independent project without a pacing mechanism. The studentsenrolled in the distance MS program have family and career obligations competing for their time.After four semesters of intense coursework the students see the directed project as an obligationwithout a firm deadline. Distance education appeals to busy people. However, the burden can beoverwhelming. “Distance-education students tend to leave us because they are very busy, theirlives are crammed full of things, and suddenly they find themselves in a situation of having torethink their priorities
, nature settings, government infrastructure, and people, can beinvaluable resources for connecting STEM curriculum within context which results in conditionsideal for promoting purposeful learning of authentic STEM content. Thus, community-basedSTEM resources offer ideal context for teaching STEM content. A benefit of focusing teacherattention on these contextual, content aligned resources is that they are in every community;making place-based STEM education a possibility, regardless of the location of STEM teachingand learning. Further, associating STEM teaching and learning with local resources addressesworkforce development and the STEM pipeline by exposing students to STEM careers andapplications in their local communities.The desire to align
implementation of resonant micro/nanoelectromechanical systems (MEMS/NEMS); the behavior of electromechanical and thermomechanical systems operating in rich, multi-physics environments; and mechanics education. Dr. Rhoads is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), where he serves on the Student Design Committee and the Design Engineering Division’s Technical Com- mittees on Micro/Nanosystems and Vibration and Sound. Dr. Rhoads is a recipient of the National Sci- ence Foundation’s Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Award, the Purdue University School of Mechanical Engineering’s Harry L. Solberg Best Teacher Award (twice), and the ASEE
resources directed towards children in Primary School (K-6). When lookingat provision overall, it is apparent that most of the initiatives focus on science & technologywith engineering & maths receiving considerably less coverage. This lack of exposure isaugmented by the almost total absence of engineering within the school curriculum; meaningthat for most young people, upon leaving High School, engineering fails to register as apotential future study or career choice[16,17,18] . In considering this issue, this paper provides abrief analysis of the second stage of a longitudinal study in which the researchers sought togain an insight into the operational issues faced by one of the UK’s largest for-profit non-governmental engineering
todayare not even being considered. Israel7 (1995) stated that “a student who has completed atechnology education program should be able to participate as an active citizen by expressingtheir positions on technological issues, making wise consumer choices such as selecting, using, Page 24.1337.9and disposing of technical artifacts, and making informed career choices.” Technologicalliteracy, according to Wiens28 (1995), “is essential to the political and economic empowermentof the citizen.”An important aspect of technological literacy is not only to understand its consequences to someextent, but to also visualize the technologies. That is where the
must “tap all talent” — attract a broad group of individuals who are presently under-represented in engineering. Second, we must restructure engineering education so that studentsexperience early in their training what engineers do. Because over forty percent of all four-year engineering graduates began their introductory studies in the community college, pre-baccalaureate preparation has drawn close attention. Women, racial/ethnic minorities, and lowincome students are well represented in community colleges, but only a small number of thesepopulations graduate with associate’s degrees in engineering and engineering technologies.Research has shown that an interest in engineering as a career impacts persistence. Yet womenand other
/tries out versions of her chemical engineer identity.BackgroundThe motivation for the study goes back several years, as a result of our involvement with theCHE portfolio courses (CHE297 and CHE397). These courses afforded an opportunity forstudents to synthesize their learning in core courses, consider the relationships between whatthey were studying and their future careers and develop their written and oral communicationskills. What emerged from that experience was the sense that there were significant changeshappening in terms of how students viewed themselves as students and potential engineers; whatwe wanted to discover was what was happening in the curriculum—and what was, perhaps,inherent in the chemical engineering culture—to facilitate
larger fraction of the cohort graduate in 4years or less (Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.008).Whether students chose to co-op or not could affect this data. The student records were examined tosee how often they reported being on co-op. While this is the only way to get an idea of thispotential effect so many years after the fact, it is not a completely reliable measure, as students whofind co-op opportunities without using the college’s career services office do not always fill out thepaperwork to inform the university. Roughly twenty-five percent of each group reported at least oneco-op experience. The honors students had slightly more terms on co-op than the standard students,but it was not a significant difference
Career the Topic Engineerng Degree Completion Opportunity Degree Figure 2 Participants Reasons for Participation in the MOOC 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Yes, an Engineering Yes, a Business Master's No Master's Degree Degree Figure 3 Participants Interest in Graduate ProgramParticipant’s responses to “Would you recommend this course or other University MOOCs to afriend?” are shown in Figure 4