feel free to make our cases to become 'living documents' reflecting the changes in the way your team thinks and solves problems.)• To design and conduct physical and / or virtual laboratory experiments, as well as analyze and interpret real measured data.• To design and integrate systems, built of components and objects, to perform a desired process for a set of defined needs, or customer requirements within time, quality and cost constraints.• To understand the total quality rules and implications within and beyond the boundaries of the selected case.• To understand, evaluate, test, learn and apply various software packages for the sake of learning problem solving methods, versus just clicking on buttons offered
emulate (or in the case of a bad design) not to emulate it. Past uses of cases to teach the technical aspects and the ethical ones have not beenequivalent, however. We expect the professor to be knowledgeable of the state-of-the-art in thetechnical areas and to reflect best engineering practice in the chosen technical area. If a casestudy uses the Colburn relation to calculate the heat transfer coefficient, the clear implication isthat its use is consistent with the view of, say, 90% of the interested parties (in this case, thepracticing engineers and engineering professors) in a similar situation. We expect professors tokeep up with the literature, to attend appropriate conferences, and to perform research in thechosen field. Using case
effects of child rearing. 15 Significantlymore men than women with children under the age of six achieve tenure. Many women assistantprofessors are choosing to postpone having children. Almost half of them say the decision wasmade because of their careers (p. 126).Not surprisingly, the inequities between male and female faculty are reflected in their salaries.More than three decades after Congress passed the Equal Pay Act, women faculty still earn from5 to 10 percent less than their male counterparts. 16Sycamore State University in 1988Original interviews conducted for the 1988 Needs Assessment study at SSU provideconsiderable insight into the situation of women faculty in 1988. However, the brevity of thereport precluded the presentation of all
skills. As part of their homework assignments, students were required to keep a two-pocket folder.Students received approximately five writing assignments during the semester. Upon collectionof the folders, a block of time was set aside (approximately six to eight hours) to read them andprovide each student with written feedback. This direct written feedback is absolutely essential.When students take time to reflect on their writing and on the instructor’s comments, the folderbecomes a highly effective tool in helping them uncover and then wrestle with theirmisconceptions while the learning is actually taking place. Typical folder activities wereapproximately one to four pages in length. To eliminate some of the burden on the instructor
Islander at 2.0%, Hispanic, of any race,at 5.0%, and Other Races at 0.4%, of the U.S. population, with combining Asian/PacificIslander into Other Races. So, one would expect the numbers of engineering students tobe approximately within these percentages. Unfortunately, that is not the currentsituation.According to the U.S. Census Bureau12, the year 2100 will reflect different populationdistributions than the current population. As stated above and shown in figure 11, thebreakdown of the U.S. population is 52.3% female, with 38.7% White females and 13.6%minority females. Of the minority population, Black females comprise 6.2%, Asian/PacificIslander at 2.0%, Hispanic, of any race, at 5.0%, and Other Races at 0.4%, of the U.S.population. In the year
Manufacturing Workshop. The students are exempt from having toattend a week of class in lieu of attending the all-day workshop on a Friday. They makearrangements in advance to be released from any regularly scheduled commitments thatday so they can participate in the workshop. It runs from 8:00am until approximately4:30pm with breaks and a 30 minute lunch period during the day just as it is offered tocompany personnel. The workshop is conducted by the two authors who are IMEC staffmanufacturing experts, trained in lean practices, who donate their time. They role playthe president and change consultant during the four rounds of production and de-briefingas described earlier in the paper. Students are asked to reflect on their learning after
fundingand effort level, and the types of analysis used. Further, these efforts do not address vitalassessment questions such as these: Is this activity meeting its objectives? What impact is it havingon students? Should we continue this activity or use limited resources to fund another, moreeffective activity? What would be more effective?We also recognize there are good reasons for the results we found in our literature review. TheWomen's Experiences in College Engineering Project's (WECE) interviews with 28 WIE directorsfrom 26 institutions provide valuable insights into WIE programs and directors that reflect onassessment and evaluation 3,13. Several findings from this report are pertinent. First, notsurprisingly, time is of the essence. The WIE
they would have tochange with it. Others, like Hem, waited on their old cheese to return - the lecture - and blamedthe professor for their lack of success in the course. Project-centered courses can be a memorableexperience for those students who get it and accept their new role in a student-centered learningenvironment and a semester of misery for those who don’t get it. One student reflected upon howhe benefited from the class. This class has really opened my eyes. … how to know what to expect from other people and where to go to find the answer that you need to finish it out. It may not be the complete answer but you can use some sort of reasoning to come up with some sort of educated guess. …I learned a lot about where to go to
can be reviewed to assess if the rawscores truly reflect the quality gradient between designs. To help in this overall review, we builda spreadsheet for a side-by-side comparison of all grades by all instructors reviewing thesubmission. Then we assess whether the points awarded accurately compensate groupsappropriately. (See Figure 5 for a portion of the 10% submission spreadsheet). This spreadsheetallows all instructors to see all totals for each section and view how their grading compared toothers. And in the final analysis, the spreadsheet allows the course director to assign a finalgrade based on the criteria in the grade sheet and norm-based comparison across the course. Overall Quality Scope Facts/Assumpt
students to the complexity of real-world problems, show how engineering companiesoperate in the real-world, and improve the higher-level skills of the students.Acknowledgments This paper is based on materials developed partially upon work supported by the NationalScience Foundation under Grant Numbers: 9752353, 9950514, 0001454, and 0089036. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of theauthors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Proposed Project How did the Project Evaluation in Engineering ClassesGoals (What will we Achieve the Goals? and a Workshop for Engineering
individual student in the project. The structure of the ECE Capstone Design Experience presented here has evolved over thelast 12 to 14 years through a process of assessment, reflection and continuous improvement.During this period we have constantly sought input from and listened to our critics (primarily ourstudents) as well as the occasional admirer. Whenever problems have arisen, we've evaluatedthem and made changes to reduce or eliminate them in the next cycle or cycles of the courses.While the current state of the two courses is generally given good marks by our students, otherdepartments in the colleges and by our accreditors, we continue to remain vigilant for newproblems and to the principle of effecting continuous course
proper level with the appropriate leadership style. The STSC was designed to havethe flexibility to use both of these models. Mini-lessons are taught on an as-needed basis and canbe taught using the appropriate level of complexity and leadership style. The timing of the phasesof the course is flexible, so that each team can progress through the group development stages atdifferent rates. The facilitator role of the STSC instructor, as opposed to teacher role, challengesthe students to work at their maximum capability.Student-centered educational principles, educational models, retention models, and the four stagesof group development were combined to allow the instructor to optimally emphasize the activeand reflective nature of learning for the
. Another question asked what they thought they needed more of in Page 8.1059.4their education. In short, these questions asked alumni to reflect on their own educationPaul L. Ross UW-Madison 4 Teaching Communication Skills Onlineas it affected their professional careers. More than 9,000 alumni responded to this survey(Perspective, 1994).In the list of subjects “which have been most useful in your career,” the top two votegetters were “Written communication” and “Oral Communication.” The next three were“Basic Engineering Science,” “Core Math Courses,” and “Design Courses.”The top five choices for “which subjects you wished you’d
on innovation with some emphasis on proven solutions.” - “Their thinking outside the box is good but they need to keep it realistic and make their deadlines.” - “We all needed to learn to be open to each other’s ideas.”(e.g. “A solar home should celebrate the sun’s light”). Through their responses in Table 9, theengineering students felt that the architecture team members could benefit from a more orderlyapproach to design, a stronger emphasis on deadlines, and a greater emphasis on productfunctionality. These responses basically reflect what the engineers consider to be the core valuesof their own approach to design. The responses presented in Tables 10 and 11 indicate that the students recognized theimportance of communication
?”“In what ways has the public discourse been advanced?”“Have course objectives been well defined?”“Has the relevant literature been cited and integrated in the course?”“Are key points covered and appropriate thematic relationships made?”The scholarship of discovery is usually assessed by refereed journal publications and conferencepresentation, and/or changes in industry practice that result from the applied research.The scholarship of teaching goes beyond the act of teaching; it arises from a reflection on the actof teaching and thus should inform and improve the act of teaching. In evaluating the scholarshipof teaching, peer reviewed articles about teaching techniques – what works and what doesn’t andstrategies for improving student learning
nature of the learning task and goals of the user, and to what extent is reflects limitations in the software and metacognitive strategies of the user. It is well known that expert readers form specific reading goals and look back and jump forward while reading in order to achieve those goals12 . That type of navigation was not evident Page 8.392.13 in the present data. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2003, American Society for Engineering Education • Individual patterns of engagement with the types of content
. Figure 3 summarizes the course objectives and outcomes for the ESE course. The objectivesfocus upon the design, analysis, and development of applications that utilize both hardware andsoftware. The outcomes indicate the observable characteristics expected from students upon com-pletion of the course. To summarize, the course is intended to address quality of service issues(e.g., safety and reliability), system modeling and analysis, and application development for sys-tems that use both hardware and software components. As the development of the course progressed, a modest number of objectives and outcomeswere modified to reflect the scope of the course. The objectives and outcomes shown in Figure 3represent the final product of the course
SAT scores showed that there are numerous ways to skew the databy ignoring or excluding certain data sets from a subject pool.16 In addition, when U.S. News &World Report stopped independently calculating student to faculty ratios in 1996 and schoolsbegan self-reporting this information, ratios dropped from 12:1 to 10:1 in one year.10 This meantthat an institution of Harvard's size with approximately 7000 undergraduate students would havehad to hire 100 more faculty in just one year to have their student-to-faculty ratios change thatmuch. The actual numbers at most schools do not reflect that large of an increase in either facultyhiring or such a dramatic drop in student enrollment, which seems to be implied in the 1996-1997self-reported
more likely to have avision to persist in these fields, even if their self-confidence is not as high as that of the youngmen.The middle school years are a critical time for forming identities, some of which may be counterproductive to success in schools and others may reflect gender stereotypes. In order to promotegender equity, a 1996 report by the American Association of University Women, Girls in theMiddle, recommends that programs be developed that 1) stress role playing and activities that arenontraditional, 2) build math and science skills, 3) expose girls to role models and mentors, and 4)address girls’ developmental and intellectual needs 20. We believe that our TechGirl website willaccomplish all of these goals.As part of the process
students did not take advantage of the opportunity to meetwith their assigned mentors, which left their mentors disappointed. This reflected poorly on theprogram at a time when we were working hard to develop strong alumni relationships.Undergraduates can be excellent Teaching Assistants. Since there is no business school atHopkins, we also do not have graduate students in business available to serve as teachingassistants. We currently hire approximately 15 of our top undergraduate students each semesterto serve as teaching assistants to our adjunct faculty. These students typically assist the faculty bypreparing handouts and copying materials, grading and marking corrections and suggestions onhomework papers, and assisting students at regularly
additional relations reflect important rhetorical-didactic linksbetween multimedia objects. Third, discussed relations make possible automatic generation oftextual logical links between multimedia objects that are connected with these relations. Forexample if a piece of text is connected to an image with “image/animation A illustrates text B”relation, then the text “Refer to the following illustration” can be when the text goes before theimage on a page. Insertion of such textual fragments will augment the coherence of themultimedia objects and will make media pages more solid4.The correlation structure facilitates automatic generation of text fragments for smooth textualtransitions and there is no need to explicitly store the text fragments in the
this course graded much harder than any other course and that it also demanded more work on graded assignments than any of my other courses. • I think I know the material a lot more than my grade reflects. This was my favorite class this semester, but I currently have a C. • This course was my least favorite of my engineering courses. I always felt overwhelmed by the material and they kept piling it on. It seemed more like a chore that I didn't want to Page 8.693.9 participate in as opposed to my other engineering courses where I felt a desire to learn. I Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for
, graduationceremonies, and new jobs reduced the number of participants who actually arrived at thecompetition to 17. Throughout the practice and qualification weekend, additional hardware andcomputer realities eliminated six more participants for a total of 11 competing teams. Figure 8. Oakland University's entry running the navigation challengeThe Design Competition component of the IGVC has been sponsored by the Society ofAutomotive Engineers (SAE) for 8 of the 10 years the competition has been held. Judges for thiscompetition are chosen to reflect both commercial and military applications of intelligent vehicles.Two weeks prior to the IGVC, all 17 teams sent their technical papers to the 2002 judges forreview. The presentations and technical
Manufacturing Engineering Technologies and Supervision Department (METS)followed a series of 5 steps: Step 1. Reflect on where your program came from. For PUC, the most noticeable observation comes from the changing demographics of the service area. In 1979, 46% of area residents found employment in the goods sector, primarily manufacturing, while in 1999, only 24%. This has a significant effect on the programs offered by the METS department: Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET), Industrial Engineering Technology (IET), Organizational Leadership and Supervision (OLS) and Computer Graphics Technology (CGT). Step 2. Determine who are your constituents. METS faculty decided that their constituents in priority
engineeringcollege that virtually encompasses NAU and all of its partners – a novel educational model thatdirectly reflects the real-world global workplaces that students will encounter when theygraduate.We do not expect our vision of a Global Engineering College to be accepted immediately in allquarters; many traditionalists will initially have difficulty accepting a model that does notmaintain absolute local control over undergraduate education. We believe, however, that theincreasing trend towards globalization and international industrial partnership requires acorresponding shift in engineering education, away from isolated, one-campus experiences, andtowards a more distributed, multi-institutional and cross-cultural model. In short, we view theGlobal
, it would enhance their chances for receivingResearch/Teaching Assistantship or Full Scholarships in graduate engineering programs. Severalcase studies (shown later) reflect on the promising nature of this approach/model.IV– DESIGN OF THE EXPERIMENTS AND THEIR ASSOCIATED APPARATUSES"Everything must be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." (Albert Einstein)The following criteria have been incorporated in the design of the experiments and the associatedapparatuses:• Safety • Simplicity and Practicality in Fabrication• Affordability/ Control of Cost • Use of Reliable Sources for Components• Durability • Use of Non-Corrosive & Aesthetically Pleasing Materials
Springs’Teaching and Learning Center. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theUniversity of Colorado at Colorado Springs, or of the Teaching and Learning Center.The majority of the code in EduFile was written under subcontract by Matthew Long of MatthewLong Enterprises, http://www.matthew-long.com. ¶ The log data was lost for these classes, so could not be included in the previous section. Page 8.1288.13 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
college? 49 51 % %Is peer evaluation to determine rank a fair system at the professional level? 71 29 % %Did you fill out the evaluation forms accurately? 94 6% %Did the scores you provided accurately reflect your true feelings about the 80 20contributions of your teammates
styles compared to only 4% having strong preference forintuitive learning styles. In fact, students with strong preferences for the active, sensing, visualand sequential learning styles outweigh students with strong preferences for the reflective,intuitive, verbal and global learning styles by significant factors. Further studies have shown 5that educational environments rich in varied learning methods provide students with a diversemeans of receiving and applying knowledge and information resulting in a more engaging andinteractive educational setting 12. The reason why interaction with information is so importantfor students is because without it, the reciprocal process of assimilation and accommodation,through which new information is
effectively are the board and other visual aids 1.58 1.87 1.68 used? 7 How available is the instructor to students for 1.63 1.68 1.61 consultation? 8 How well was the course material paced? 1.54 1.83* 2.16** 9 How accurately does the instructor's grading 1.69 1.94 2.12* reflect what the student has learned? 10 How would you rate this instructor compared to 1.40 1.58* 1.88** other instructors? Outcomes Assessment Skill, Knowledge, Ability or Attitude Area 11 How would you rate your ability to apply what 1.75 1.81