with common, everyday ethicalchallenges. We suggest that students would profit immensely from learning why (otherwise)well-intentioned people fail to live up to their own moral commitments and/or the ethicalrequirements of their professions. And after teaching students about this last, we believe studentsshould be provided a set of tools, an ethical toolbox if you will, they can use to decrease thelikelihood that they will make ethical errors in the future. Most (perhaps all) professional ethicsclasses and textbooks neglect to provide students with these tools.1# (Note: We do not claim thatlearning ethical theory is unnecessary or ought to be eliminated. In fact, we believe ethical theoryis important. However, learning about ethical theory
numbers to shrinkdramatically, but it did suggest that enrollment growth in this program would be limited. Inorder to best leverage available resources for the program, a complete redesign of thecombinations of course offerings, the physical resources, and the human resources wasundertaken. Although local industry had a vested interest, and supported the redesign, thisrestructuring project was initiated and completed by the program’s faculty.Course Offerings (within the major)Table 1 lists the major course offerings by semester and by lab as they were originally offered.This is a pretty traditional arrangement, and very similar to other programs in the system.Table 1. Initial Course offeringsYear 1 (old lab)Fall
Page 23.866.2“curricular strand”, which is a set of consecutive courses within a major. Although ourinterventions will take place only in Statics and Mechanics of Materials I, we will measurestudent progress in the subsequent courses Mechanics of Materials II and Structural Analysis toassess the lasting effectiveness of our approach.2. Description of New Course ModulesSeveral experts both at our institution and at others were polled as to what types of issues andproblems are important to address in the mechanics courses for students in the CivilEngineering/Structural Engineering track. Based on their responses and on practical issues, wedeveloped three new modules, summarized as follows: Module 1: Slope of Road. In this module, assigned
event thatusually happens during the 2nd undergraduate year. Figure 1 illustrates the numbers of years ofschooling completed by each participant prior to attending their internship. The majority of thestudents attended their internship after completing three years of academic study.Approximately 2/3 of the survey participants were enrolled in the USMA MechanicalEngineering program, the remainder were enrolled in the USAFA Aerospace Engineeringprogram. 6% 32% 3 yrs 2 yrs
where the students were the “stars” of the show. Each part of the programwas designed to support one or more of the goals of the ESA which are 1) building academic selfefficacy, 2) creating a sense of community and belonging, 3) balancing academic, social life andself, and ultimately 4) retention. There was a significant increase in the scores on the firstphysics exam for the Backstage Bucknell ESA 2016 participants as compared to the previousESA 2015 class. Given that the student selection process and other programming for the ESAstudents has been the same this academic year as in the past, it is likely that these increases inperformance can be attributed to the Backstage Bucknell programming.BackgroundThe ESA is an academic success program
and C.The knowledge required to answer this question correctly is not typical knowledge that anyengineering or engineering technology student would be expected to know. (The answer is A, bythe way.) It is the author’s hope that when students without prior knowledge use the videos andquizzes, more meaningful data can be gleaned from the quiz performance.In the part #1 quiz, over eighty percent of the questions had an increase in correct answers fromthe pre- to post-quizzes. Over eighty percent of the students also increased their performancebetween the pre- and post-quizzes. Similarly in the part #2 quiz, ninety percent of the samemetrics (individual questions and individual students) saw increased performance from pre- topost-quizzes. Thus
Jacobianmatrices using a recursive identification technique3. In what follows, the Jacobianestimation is discussed. Page 23.870.2Estimation of Jacobians Let us represent a nonlinear system by the following vector-matrix state equations: ̇ = f[x(t), u(t), t], and y(t) = g[x(t), u(t), t] (1)Where x(t) represents the 1 state vector, u(t) is the 1 input vector, f[x(t), u(t), t]denotes an 1 function and the output, y(t), is 1 vector. In general f is a function ofstate vector and the input vector. It should be clear that no single linear model canaccurately represent the system because of its wide operating
intensity and environmental impact.At CSULB, 100 to 300 students enroll in the energy and environment course in every semester.Roughly 20% of students are from engineering, another 20% from environmental science policyprogram, and rest from all majors across the campus. Students participate in a variety ofactivities including online group discussion and debate, projects and site visits.The characteristics of the five faculty participants and their instructional contexts aresummarized in Table 1.Table 1. Faculty participants’ characteristics and the context of their instructional media.Faculty Campus Gender Years of Number of ApproximateMember Location teaching in
chemistry students.14 A chi-square test wasutilized for dichotomous variables to assess whether there is a statistically significant differencein the responses of the two groups.15 A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for all Likert-typequestions.16 For all tests performed in this analysis, the maximum probability of Type-I error (e.g.a false positive result) that was permitted was 5%. Note that only survey items pertaining tostudent preparation, background, and attitudes was analyzed in this paper. All analyses wereconducted using the statistical software system R.17Results /DiscussionThe results of the various t-tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests are summarized in Table 1, and theresults of the chi-square tests are summarized in Table 2. Only tests
that the course modifications have had on the university as a whole.Finally, the paper will present assessment results of pre- and post-course surveys of studentperceptions of the use of ACL and PBL to apply attributes of the entrepreneurial mindset. Thesurveys demonstrate a positive shift in perceptions.1. IntroductionLawrence Technological University has offered engineering students entrepreneurial educationprograms for many years. Recognizing that graduates entering industry will require business andentrepreneurial skills, the College of Engineering developed an entrepreneurial certificateprogram and founded the Lear Entrepreneurial Center. The entrepreneurial certificate programdevelops student skills in communication and business
designed to compare measures of creativity of projectsproduced in two distinctly different problem-solving environments: a linear (DEAL) approachversus a more open-ended, choice-based approach.The DEAL method, currently used in some areas of the North Carolina technology education curriculum, is a somewhat linear approach, requiring that students: 1. Define the problem and goals for the problem-‐solving task; 2. Explore possible strategies and new information for accomplishing those goals; 3. Anticipate the outcomes of those strategies in order to decide which to Act upon; and 4. Look back and Learn. DEAL functions as a precursor to more
computer language tocode their algorithms for the larger problems and therefore their efforts would be spent onsolving the problem.For CS 053/054, the two courses’ instructors meet weekly to coordinate instruction in two ways:1) to insure that all students in all sections have the same materials presented in like manner andat the same time, and 2) to coordinate the topics of the lab exercises to reflect the current topicsin the lectures. So doing, all students will have seen the same material presented prior to startingthe lab exercise.CS 053 is a traditional lecture course. The first lecture is used to set the stage for the rest of thesemester by going over the syllabus, how programs are submitted, and so on. All other lecturesare dedicated to
preferences. Each design team includes four to five seniors, a faculty coach, the client,and the course instructor. There is no charge for the design projects other than direct costs. Theseyearlong, client-based projects have been the senior design capstone model at Rose-Hulmansince 1988.The four learning objectives for client-based, senior design projects include: (1)problem-based learning (of the civil engineering design process), (2) communication proficiency,(3) team-work skills, and (4) project management orientation. The year-long experience containsmany key elements and deliverables to achieve these learning objectives.In 2005, members of the civil engineering faculty decided it would be beneficial for students toventure into the international
heavily weighted withstudents from traditionally underrepresented groups, including women and minorities.Most students, whether at the undergraduate or graduate level, are reentering an academicenvironment after having been out in the working world for some time. Like any otheruniversity, NU is always considered a center of excellence with main objectives toprovide education, conduct research, in addition to providing public service to itsconstuents [1]. Similarly, National University Library System (NULS) supports alleducational and research activities of students, faculty, and staff of all of the affiliates ofthe National University System. Our library uses a Library Management System (LMS)that provides easy access to a countless array of
undergraduates are thrilled by the projects and their freedom to innovate and perform research. They usually perform outstanding work, presented at local and international conferences. Their attitude is also reflected in their evaluations of teachers. We are hopeful that our experience will provide useful ideas, particularly to new faculty. 1. INTRODUCTIONUndergraduate students go through a steep learning curve during their studies. They are likely toreach high theoretical knowledge and may expect everything to be clearly spelled out forinvestigation. A recent IBM study1 based on face-to-face conversations with more than 1,500chief executive officers worldwide concludes that creativity is the most important factor forfuture
relies on developing target models of experts’ understandings of phenomena.Both naïve and expert cognitive models can engage both individual and socially sharedcognitive processes 5, and knowledge of both processes is necessary to characterizeknowledge in a field. Situated cognition experts contend that knowledge only exists in context and hasvery limited meaning and usefulness when taught out of context 1, 6, 7. An educationalneed exists to better integrate engineering students within the context of engineeringpractice and to develop and implement curricular materials that represent this integration.The lack of a target cognitive model and associated situated and research-based curricularmaterials impedes students’ abilities to be
performance and behavior 1–3, but therelationship between motivation and cognition, particularly in engineering, has not beenexamined in a way that is useful to practitioners. Motivation is a major factor in students’progress towards critical thinking and solving problems 1,2, skills that are commonly identified asimportant in preparing students for the ever-changing global challenges they will face aspracticing engineers. Understanding relationships between motivation and problem solving couldhelp engineering educators address challenges including increasing interest in engineering, andpreparing students to become effective problem solvers.The purpose of this study is to answer the following research questions: • RQ1: What factors contribute to
. These areas, as well as others, help to improve the understanding of Page 23.274.2linkages between water, energy and carbon cycles. Data for measurements in SMAP are carriedout by antennas. Specifically the SMAP concept utilizes L-band radar and radiometerinstruments sharing a rotating 6-m mesh reflector antenna to provide high-resolution and high-accuracy global maps of soil moisture and freeze/thaw state every two to three days.A SMAP mission is depicted in Figure 1 as below. Figure 1: SMAP MissionSome basic parameters such as power, radiation pattern and efficiency, directivity, beam solidangle, polarization
note that the questions not only help the students find themathematical solution to the problem, but also often ask them to think more deeply about thesolution. For example, students may find that a structure is not designed correctly and are thenasked how it could be changed to meet the desired design specifications. This process requiresthem to not only solve the equation, but they must also understand its meaning and know how tomanipulate it. An example problem from one of the modules is provided in Fig. 1; the moduleproblem sets can be obtained via the project website12. Page 23.275.3 Search and Rescue
Page 23.276.3Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). It isessential that mentors have an understanding of each of these areas including: calculus concepts,student learning, campus resources, and engineering student groups. Saturn V Rocket Acceleration (a) (b) Fig. 1: (a) The Saturn V rocket—the only vehicle ever constructed capable of putting a man on the moon. In over 40 years man has failed to repeat this task. (b) A plot of the altitude of Apollo 11 as it ascends into orbit.The Saturn V rocket, shown in Fig. 1(a), was used to put men on the moon and launch Skylab. Now with the
23.277.2will provide detailed project description and resulting classroom activities that were developed asa result of the RET project.IntroductionOsteoblasts of a mammalian organism (mouse) are used in this experiment. The cell line ofosteoblasts are roughly 15-30 µm. in diameter and, if not scaffolding, are generally spherical inshape. This allows for a symmetrical shape to observe rotation accurately in an E-Field insolution. These cells are cultured, and then subcultured, with an optimal 1-2 day incubationbetween cultures. This insures scaffolding does not take place (If scaffolding begins cells are nolonger spherical/symmetrical for measuring rotation). Cell population must also be kept to aminimum to insure cells do not clump together and form
car (see [1] for example). However, students are often unaware of what a cell phonecan do, and/or are motivated by working on a project that stimulates them outside of the regularcoursework required for their degree program.ProjectIn this project, two undergraduate students in an Electrical and Computer EngineeringTechnology (ECET) program were funded with an undergraduate research grant to demonstratethe capabilities of a cell phone by using it to control a radio controlled car. Grant funding wasused to fund the students’ efforts and purchase a radio controlled car and the necessaryelectronics hardware to modify the car to receive the signals from the cell phone. It should benoted that a cell phone purchased and owned by one of the students
Page 23.279.2 Biodiesel Processor and a KioskAs the renewable energy program grew, another budget allocation funded the purchase of anoff-grid solar photovoltaic system, a solar thermal system, and a 1 kW wind turbine. Furtherequipment purchases were funded through the acquisition of grants and appropriations. Thelaboratory now has equipment to test the biodiesel fuel produced which is used in thegrounds equipment to mow the grass and sweep the snow. To support the residential energyefficiency courses, there are blower doors, duct blasters, combustion analyzers, thermalimaging equipment and insulation blowing equipment. The renewable energy courses arefurther supported with a 1.4 kW additional solar photovoltaic
students who have very good GPA struggle during senior capstone design. This is duemainly to the lack of system-level integrating experience. When given a real-life project,students have challenges of linking it with what they have learned from different courses inprevious years. “It seems that all the course projects we completed previously in individualcourse have nothing to do with the senior design” said one student.One of the student outcomes evaluated by ABET for engineering programs accreditation is “anability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs…”1. Among the most-favored pedagogical models to help students attaining this ability are integrated curricula2,project-based learning (PBL), problem-based learning, and
that are required to solve thechallenge as the course progresses. This processengages students in high level problem solvingtasks of design, trouble shooting and systemsanalysis which they will do during theirprofession.Challenge-based instruction has been usedsuccessfully in multiple engineering contextsincluding bioengineering[2], civil engineering[6]and first year engineering to name a few. Figure 1: STAR Legacy Learning CycleCommon to each of these efforts was the use ofthe STAR.Legacy learning cycle to guide the instructional design[7]. STAR stands for SoftwareTechnology for Action and Reflection. Action and reflection define the primary pedagogicalapproach. The learning cycle, shown in Figure 1, illustrates a common
Education, 2013 Challenges and Benefits of Programming Competitions as Outreach to High School StudentsAbstractSoftware development-oriented competitions are one way that computing degree programs likesoftware engineering, support outreach to local high schools. Such competitions motivatestudents to succeed, help students build teamwork, and assist in improving student softwareskills. Indeed, there are a variety of different types of competitions ranging from robotics [1] toprocess-oriented that emphasize team interactions [2]. This paper reports on the approach used byRobert Morris University (RMU) that annually conducts programming competition for area highschool students.The goal of the paper is to provide
suggests a mechanism design to achieve higher deflection. The paper will discuss thefirst two models. In conclusion, the paper points out how engineering education could benefitfrom exposure and participation in such a design process even though students were not involvedin this study originally.IntroductionThermoelectric generators convert heat to electricity. Current geometry and materials used indesigns shown in figures 1 and 2 result to rigid devices. The geometry ensures no moving partswhile the materials provide a high figure of merit (ZT). ZT=S2σ/k, where k is thermalconductivity, σ is the electrical conductivity, and S is the Seebeck coefficient. The figure ofmerit, ZT, is dimensionless and is formed by multiplying Z with the average
” has to take the social as well asthe environmental impacts into account. So the question is: how should the engineering schoolprepare the future engineer to perform in the new challenging social environment? If it ispossible to suggest some actions, the key is to prepare the future engineers to learn how to workclose to communities and governments, addressing the outcomes of the projects to solve socio-technological problems.1. IntroductionThe present world, full of challenges and crises of deep consequences to society as well to theenvironment, has a strong incidence in terms of decision making in any field. It means that it isbecoming more and more complex and difficult to take decisions due to the fact that theimplications are felt in a
are shown in Figure 1. The remaining 20% of the homework grade is based on portfoliochecks. The intent of the EF 151 portfolio is to help students organize all of their materials forthe class, and to encourage students to document all of their work in a clear and methodicalmanner. To this end all students are required to maintain a portfolio of all work in a 3-ringbinder. Students are graded based on their overall portfolio, as well as on the format and clarityof individual random written homework problems.Recently a bonus system (Schilling, 2010) was implemented in the homework system, wherebystudents receive a 10% bonus homework problems completed at 24 hours or more in advance ofthe due date. This bonus has resulted in over half of the
students in authentic, ill-structured engineering tasks facilitates the development oftheir engineering skills.1-3To facilitate students’ authentic practice of these skills we have developed a learning systembased on virtual laboratories. In this learning system, student teams take on the role of processdevelopment engineers. They are tasked with finding suitable input parameters to be released tohigh volume manufacturing through experiments that are completed virtually. When studentsperform experiments, the lower cognitive demand affords them the opportunity to build a richexperimental design. While not instructed to do so, most student teams inevitably resort tomodeling as a tool to progress towards completion.Student team modeling practices are