this project were selected for interest in the project and complementary diversity ofSTEM backgrounds, namely they are majoring in mechanical engineering (2), systems engineering(1), and environmental science (1).CurriculumUnder the BLIMP program, the team is developing a standards-aligned written curriculum withten lesson plans and supporting videos, disseminated via a website. The ten lessons fall under fivelesson strands on structural engineering, basics of aero/hydrodynamics, basics of biologicallyinspired propulsion, an introduction to system design and integration, and an introduction to swarmdynamics and agent-based modeling. Significant concepts within each lesson strand andcorresponding Next Generation Science Standards [5] and Common
Paper ID #36564Transdisciplinary STEAM education: Advocating forcompassion as a core value in engineeringCristian Eduardo Vargas Ordonez Cristián (Cris) Vargas-Ordóñez (he/his/él) is a Colombian third-year PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. Raised around the life of photography and as an amateur contact improv dancer and yoga teacher, he is interested in integrating the arts and engineering in educational settings to promote and protect universally recognized human rights and fundamental freedoms. His research with his advisor, Dr. Morgan Hynes, includes literature reviews, calls for
sustainability. For example, Outcome 4 requires students tobe able to “consider… global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts.” VillanovaUniversity was awarded a grant to pilot the EOP framework. To integrate the EOP framework asrapidly as possible a faculty workshop was developed. This workshop has been delivered twiceto cohorts of eight faculty each during five half-day sessions. These faculty have addressedtwenty outcomes and assessed seven. At the time of writing, EOP outcomes have been includedand assessed in three courses: two required undergraduate courses and one graduate level course.Assignments, group projects, and exam questions were used to assess the achievement ofselected EOP outcomes.This paper will present an introduction to
sustainable in the long run. To better suit different types of learnersand to make the program more adaptable to settings without access to a 3D printer, the IDEASteam is creating new curriculum materials and teacher resources which focus on hand-builtconstruction and materials exploration to be made publicly available by 2023. This paperpresents findings from the past two years of this six-year research practice partnership in whichthe IDEAS Maker Program Curriculum was adapted, tested, iterated, finalized, and scaled foruse within an inclusion setting specifically designed for autistic students to learn alongsidenonautistic peers.MethodsAdapting the IDEAS Maker Program In the wake of a complete transition to remote learning in New York City
Paper ID #37681Work in Progress: Enhancing Undergraduate BiomedicalEngineering Laboratory Reports through Information andData Literacy InstructionAlexander James Carroll (Librarian for STEM Research) Alex Carroll, MSLS, AHIP, is the Librarian for STEM Research at the Vanderbilt University Libraries. Alex serves as a liaison librarian for the School of Engineering and STEM academic units within the College of Arts and Science, supporting the research of faculty and developing curriculum-integrated information literacy instruction programs for students in the sciences. Alex is the Interim Editor-in-Chief of the
distribution.Bibliography[1] Li, H., & Jin, K. (2021). An innovation framework to integrate engineering standards into industrial engineeringgraduate curriculum [Article]. Smart and Sustainable Manufacturing Systems, 5(2), Article 707.https://doi.org/10.1520/SSMS20200012[2] LaMack, J. A., Fennigkoh, L., & Licato, P. (2019). Work in progress: Improving student views of medicaldevice standards through implementation in a first-term biomedical engineering course. 2019 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition[3] Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology. (2021). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs,2021 – 2022. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2021-2022/#GC5[4] Phillips, M
involved in various engineering education initiatives focusing on the integration of novel technologies into the engineering classroom, and excellence in instruction. His additional research interests include water, and wastewater treatment, civil engineering infrastructure, and transportation engineering.Jaskirat Sodhi (Senior University Lecturer) Dr. Jaskirat Sodhi is interested in first-year engineering curriculum design and recruitment, retention and success of engineering students. He is the coordinator of ENGR101, an application-oriented course for engineering students placed in pre-calculus courses. He has also developed and co-teaches the Fundamentals of Engineering Design course that includes a wide spectra of
concepts, enhanced communication and teamwork skills, and increased motivation and enjoyment of learning [2].The potential benefits, combined with the importance of placing engineering within asocietal/human context [3], highlights the value of integration.The possible forms of integration are quite varied, including: in-course activities, integrationwithin major/program curriculum, available minors, honors courses, study abroad opportunities,symposia/seminars, special courses, workshops, undergraduate community experiences, generaleducation courses, etc. [4] However, regardless of the form of integration, the motivation andengagement of the students in the subjects presented is critical to the educational experience.One example showing
longer just a simple combination of the four disciplines, butemphasis more on the process of interdisciplinary learning [11]. The goal of STEM isto provide students with an integrated, interdisciplinary learning environment to betteracquire and apply the knowledge and skills required in the 21st century [12].STEM teachers are often regarded as the important factors of improving STEMeducation, as the STEM teachers teach students knowledge and skills and meanwhilecontinuously improving STEM curriculum and teaching methods, to cultivate STEMtalents but also promote the development of STEM education [1], [13]. But variousresearch also has indicated that it is not enough for STEM teachers to only have theknowledge of their own disciplines to
semester which affords students an opportunity to win cash prizes to help fund theirinnovative ideas as well as scholarships to continue pursuing the D&I minor. Lastly, the M3model includes a pathway to innovation approach with a new structure to offering dualcredit coursework to urban public high schools. This novel approach has been designed toenhance access to the program starting in high school. The new dual-credit approach, whichis called the facilitator model, allows high school teachers to be trained in facilitating theinnovation-focus curriculum in their schools day-to-day but with the university faculty beingthe instructor of record to evaluate the student progress. This strategy helps to navigatepolicies that inherently limit student
meaningful research that serves the wider research community.Specifically, our approach involves having students work on research projects that focuses on thedevelopment of pre-college curriculum or STEM outreach activities that are relevant to theresearch mentors’ work. Within this structure students gain valuable research and developmentskills, but at a level that is appropriate for their age level while reducing the projects costs andensuring safety of students. This is of value to many federally funded researchers, as they are oftenlooking for ways to add a broader impact component to their research projects. In a way thisapproach “kills two birds with one stone:” provides students an authentic research project andproduces pre-college activities
engineering curriculum. Therefore, the introduction of divergent thinking canbe met with resistance, especially if it is not related to and integrated into the engineeringcurriculum. If it is perceived as a different field, then students may not understand that studyingtheir ethical decisions will relate directly to their careers. To combat this, some instructorsapproach ethics from a convergent (cognitive) perspective and/or engage students by grabbingtheir attention (heroic actions, catastrophic events, fictionalized scenarios) that may not be aseffective at changing behavior due to taking too large of an imaginative leap.Preparation for ethical conflicts makes one more likely to act ethically [23], but most ethicaldecisions engineers face in
on Accessible, Hands-on AI and Robotics Education, 2004.[2] R. Manseur, "Development of an undergraduate robotics course," in Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1997 27th Annual Conference, 1997.[3] B. A. Maxwell and L. A. Meeden, "Integrating robotics research with undergraduate education," IEEE Intelligent systems and their applications , vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 22-27, 2000.[4] I. R. Nourbakhsh, K. Crowley, A. Bhave, E. Hamner, T. Hsiu, A. Perez-Bergquist, S. Richards and K. Wilkinson, "The robotic autonomy mobile robotics course: Robot design, curriculum design and educational assessment," Autonomous Robots, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 103-127, 2005. 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
graduate students in STEMinterdisciplinary training and prepare them for the national workforce [3]. The NRT at ouruniversity prepares masters and doctoral students to solve the grand challenges at the nexus ofFEWS, which are complex and interdependent, and require solutions integrating engineering,natural sciences, and social sciences. Only a small percentage of college students in the UnitedStates take an interdisciplinary capstone course [4], and interdisciplinary capstones are moreprevalent at the undergraduate level [4]. At the graduate level, capstone courses are limited andvaried [5] [6] [7]. Faculty from the colleges of Engineering, Agriculture, and Arts and Sciencesat our university developed the NRT Capstone as a new part of the NRT
the curriculum [1, 2]. In addition, studies have shown that PjBL hasimproved students’ retention of prior and current course material [3-5]. Outside of theimprovements in future engineering courses, the use of PjBL has shown to better preparestudents for the workforce and the challenges they may face. However, one concern ofimplementation of PjBL is that it may overwhelm a student especially when conducted in lowerlevel courses. In some cases, schools of higher education may choose to teach lower levelcourses following the conventional lecture format and allow students to participate incompetition teams as an extra-curricular activity.Numerous engineering programs across the world participate in competition programs, such asBaja SAE (Society
learning and development ofinnovation skills such as integrative learning, teamwork, and problem-solving.Collaborative learning (CL) as an approach to learning has been shown to benefit studentssocially, psychologically, and academically (Laal & Ghodsi, 2011), and as such, incorporatingthis strategy within innovation education may help provide students with richer learningexperiences. Specifically, CL has been found to develop social support for learners, builddiversity in understanding concepts, develop learning communities, increase student self-esteem,reduce student learning anxiety, and promote critical thinking skills, among other benefits (Laal& Ghodsi, 2011; Johnson & Johnson, 1989; Pantiz, 1999). CL is often a key component
observed to have more of an impacton IL rubric scores than students’ previous participation in IL workshops or writing intensivecourses. Results suggest that more practice with higher order skills in context of the engineeringdesign process at additional points during the curriculum may be necessary to enable students toretain these skills. Additional recommendations based on the analysis include making ILrequirements in the Capstone grading rubric more explicit and granular, and combiningengineering subject matter experts and engineering librarians to collectively score students’work. This may be a path to enabling more rubric-based assessments of IL in the engineeringdiscipline.BackgroundMechanical Engineering students at Northeastern University
Columbus desired to upgrade its teaching andlearning methods to a more modern, active, and student-centered style. While PurduePolytechnic Columbus always had emphasized applied learning more than theorylearning and included many hands-on activities in the classes, some improvements © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings | Paper ID 35927were needed to transform the educational experience to the 21st century. There are 10elements to this transformation: 1. Theory-based Applied Learning 2. Team Project-based Learning 3. Modernized Lecture Methods 4. Integrated Learning-in-Context Curriculum 5. Integrated Humanities Studies 6. Competency
passion for the engineering profession among students. Theseprograms often adopt engaged pedagogies that integrate technical and non-technical (e.g., ethicsand communication) competencies into the curriculum. A major goal of such an integrativeapproach to engineering education is to present students with a more holistic vision of theengineering profession, and communicate to students that skills necessary for good, responsibleengineering are integrative by nature. Therefore, it is relatively natural that instructors oftenassess the efficacy of these pedagogies in their classes in terms of how these pedagogies affectstudents’ ethical perceptions and the development of their ethical competencies. As a result,some first-year engineering instructors
the workforce, curricula must be continuous, theoretical, and practical. To documentthis articulation and its benefits to workforce, in this study, we investigate:RQ. To what degree does the Florida AM Curriculum Frameworks reflect the needs of AMemployers?In this paper, we present the method and early results of a comparison of employer needs andcurriculum outcomes in rural northwest Florida we conducted to determine if employers needwhat AM preparation programs are teaching their students.2.0 Literature ReviewThe present study is based in Florida, where 22 of the 28 community and state collegesparticipate in or have adopted an Engineering Technology (ET) program [6]. Enrollment in theET program has also gone from 1,776 students in 2015-16
Teaching Professor) Marko Lubarda is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of California, San Diego. He teaches mechanics, materials science, design, computational analysis, and engineering mathematics courses, and has co-authored the undergraduate textbook Intermediate Solid Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, 2020). He is dedicated to engineering pedagogy and enriching students' learning experiences through teaching innovations, curriculum design, and support of undergraduate student research.Alex M PhanNathan Delson (Professor) Nathan Delson is a Teaching Professor at the University of California at San Diego. His research interests include
in the Department of Engineering Education and Leadership at the University of Texas at El Paso. As an NSF Graduate Research Fellow, she received her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering, with a concentration in Biomechanics, from The University of Texas at Austin. An engineering education researcher, her work focuses on enhancing engineering students' motivation, exploring engineering identity formation, engineering faculty development, developing integrated course sequences, and methods for involving students in curriculum development and teaching through Peer Designed Instruction. Dr. Kendall's scholarship emphasizes the professional formation of engineers, specifically through the development and application
& Mina, 2021). However, being a note-taking practice aimed atimproving memory recall, sketchnotes do not incorporate narrative storytelling, making itdifficult to follow for those who did not participate in the event where the notes were taken inthe first place.Visual Verbal Integrated (VIVID) Thinking (Roam, 2011) is an approach to communicationand visual thinking developed by business visualization expert Dan Roam. Built on thetheory that for most people, verbal communication is linear and reductionist whereas visualcommunication is holistic and synthesizing, VIVID Thinking describes a number ofcommunication rules that integrate visual and verbal elements to improve communicationand catalyze ideation. In many ways, VIVID Thinking is very
reliable and efficient process and are widely taught in manyengineering curricula. Recent developments in software and computing power enable near-real-time FE simulations that allow students to quickly explore different iterations of their designs.Material selection is another integral part of the product design cycle and should be considered inthe design process, ideally alongside the modeling. Balancing objectives and constraints to findthe material that best meets the design criteria requires both an understanding of the product’s finalapplication as well as materials science fundamentals. One challenge with combining materialsselection and FE modeling is they are often taught separately, which can lead to one of the areasbeing underutilized
through smartdevices, users are increasingly exposed to cyber-crimes. Due to the limited training oncybersecurity and cyber-safe practices, young adults are especially an easy target for thesecybercrimes. It is also well-known that there is a need to enhance organizations’ cybersecuritycapabilities while spreading cybersecurity awareness among the masses. To the former cause,degree programs have been established throughout the US to train the workforce; however, theyhave proved insufficient. Therefore, we propose developing and integrating plug-and-playmodules for CS/CSE undergraduate courses at various levels to develop a security mindset amongthese students and inculcate interest in a cybersecurity career. Irrespective of what domain ofCS/CSE
-Champaign. Prior to joining Illinois ECE as a faculty, she worked at IBM Systems Group in Poughkeepsie, NY in z Systems Firmware Development. Her current interests include recruitment and retention of under-represented students in STEM, K-12 outreach, integrative training for graduate teaching assistants, and curriculum innovation for introductory computing courses. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comTeaching Electronic Circuits with a Balance of Rigor, Intuition, Approximation, and Inspection AnalysisAbstractAnalog and mixed signal IC design is an important area in ECE and courses on this topic areusually offered to senior
Collaborative Teaching Model: Synergy of Teaching Assistants in a First-yearEngineering Course During the PandemicDr. Gerald TembrevillaGerald Tembrevilla obtained his PhD in science (physics) education at the University of BritishColumbia. He served as a postdoctoral fellow in the Faculty of Engineering at McMasterUniversity. Currently, he is an Assistant Professor at Mount Saint Vincent University in Halifax,Canada and teaching and researching on the integration of learning technologies to improvehands-on science, scientific argumentation skills, and examination of the complicated impacts oflearning technologies and design on K-12 STEM curriculum, pedagogy, and institutional policiesin the Philippines and Canada.Dr. André PhillionAndré
pureProduct (1a) and Equipment/Machine Design (1d) are possibilities, projects often focus onProcess Design (1b) which in recent years has increasingly involved use of Robotics andAutomation (1e), and Manufacturing Systems Integration (1f). Design of Tooling is alsocommon (1c). “Improvement” is the bread-and-butter design modality for a manufacturingengineer as opposed to novel product or machine design. As such, the design activity is typicallyhighly constrained by an existing process. The design problem is often framed as improvementto a process through changes such as better tooling, incorporation of robotics and automation,improved layouts and workflow, more efficient resource utilization, enhanced workerergonomics and safety, and better
interactive learning and practical hands-onexperience. Recently, integration of flipped classrooms and gamification is designed and practiced inmany different engineering courses, which has been demonstrated with a significant increase in learninginterest, attitude, and student-instructor interaction[1]–[4]. The framework of such integration forperson-centered education in engineering courses could potentially enable students to acquire self-reflective competencies and self-motivated problem solving. For example, Kahoot!, a flexible andsimple tool that works on any devices, is being used widely at different levels of education system tocreate, play, and share games in the form of quizzes and homework[5]. Furthermore, new game features,like the Jumble
minorities had substantial improvement in theirprofessional skills as well as advanced their knowledge in both areas of infrastructuresustainability and Front-End Planning. Furthermore, the analysis of the open-ended questionsrevealed that the students valued the PBL method because it offers interactivity, teamwork, aninterdisciplinary knowledge-sharing platform, and the ability to simulate a real-life workenvironment. The findings of this study reveal the positive outcome of the implementedapproach by integrating PBL activity in sustainability education for minority students from AECmajors. This method conveys an effective scheme to foster infrastructure sustainability conceptswhile nurturing multiple professional skills of minority students