/documentation/development-kitsboards/cy8ckit-059-psoc-5lp-prototyping-kit- onboard-programmer-and2. Strom, S. A., & Loker, D. "Programmable System-On-Chip (PSoC) Usage in an Engineering Technology Program." Annual Meeting, American Society for Engineering Education. (2016).3. Bishop, Robert H., Learning with LabVIEW 2009, Pearson Education, 2010.4. Travis, Jeffrey and Jim Kring, LabVIEW for Everyone, 3rd Edition, Pearson Education, 2007.5. Essick, John, Hands-On Introduction to LabVIEW for Scientists and Engineers, 2nd Edition, Oxford University Press, 2013.6. Loker, D., & Strom, S. A. "Automated Test & Measurement System for a Power Supply and Control Board." Annual Meeting, American Society for Engineering
–554, 2013. [8] A. Ayebo and A. Mrutu, “An exploration of calculus students’ beliefs about mathematics,” International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 385–392, 2019. [9] R. E. Wood and E. A. Locke, “The relation of self-efficacy and grade goals to academic performance,” Educational and psychological measurement, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1013–1024, 1987.[10] IBM Corp., “IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 26.0. armonk: IBM corp.” 2019.[11] J. E. Parsons, T. Adler, R. Futterman, S. Goff, C. Kaczala, J. Meece, and C. Midgley, “Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors,” Achievement and achievement motives, pp. 75–146, 1983.[12] J. S. Eccles and A. Wigfield, “Motivational beliefs, values, and
of femaleprofessionals in the STEM fields.Our future direction would be to track the number of students who enroll in STEM fields afterthey finish the series of STEM Program for Female High School Students.References:[1] Sahin, A., Ayar, M. C., and Adiguzel, T., "STEM Related After-School Program Activities and AssociatedOutcomes on Student Learning", Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(1), 309-322, 2014.[2] Ma, G., and Ma, L., "Retaining Female Students in a Robotics Program", Proceedings of the 2017 AmericanSociety for Engineering Education conference and exposition , 2017.[3] https://www.builtbyme.com/statistics -facts-women-in-stem/, April 20, 2019.[4] Zywno, M. S., Gilbride, K. A., and Gudz, N., "Innovative outreach programs
Mississippi State University. Dr. Garshasby is an architect, researcher, and educator who currently teaches collaborative studio(s) and environmental building systems within the College of Architecture, Art and Design at Mississippi State University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Assessing LEED Credit Weighting: A Dual Perspective on Sustainable Construction and Educational Implications Mohsen Goodarzi1, Mohsen Garshasby21 Assisstant Professor, Department of Construction Management and Interior Design, Ball State University 2 Assistant Professor, Building Construction Science, Mississippi State UniversityAbstract:This research
Professional Engineer in Nevada with experience working on a variety of water, stormwater, and wastewater system projects. He is also the Faculty Director of the Student Innovation Idea Labs at Cal Poly Pomona, which oversees the campus startup programming and maker spaces.Mr. Seth Claberon Sullivan, Texas A&M University Seth Sullivan is the Director of the Zachry Leadership Program in the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the university, he worked in consulting in the private sector and as an analyst in the U.S. Government. Heˆa C™s earned ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Benchmarking a foundation for improving psychological safety in
across diverse educational contexts. Pursuing suchinnovations in grading practices promises to advance educational equity and ensure studentsuccess more accurately reflects ability and effort.References 1. T. M. Addy et al., What Inclusive Instructors Do: Principles and Practices for Excellence in College Teaching. Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2021. 2. J. M. Malouff, A. J. Emmerton, and N. S. Schutte, "The risk of a halo bias as a reason to keep students anonymous during grading," Teaching of Psychology, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 233-237, 2013. 3. L. R. Southgate, "Rethinking Anonymous Grading," Ethic Theory Moral Prac, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi-org.proxy-bc.researchport.umd.edu/10.1007/s10677-023-10415-y 4
: Sustainable Infrastructure Framework Guidance Manual.” Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure, Washington DC, USA, p. 192, 2018.[10] T. Tanner, A. Bahadur, C. Simonet, and H. Betts, “Resilience scan | 2014,” 2016.[11] B. G. Celik, M. E. Ozbek, S. Attaran, and M. Jalili, “Comparison of Environmental Responsibility of Construction Management Students Based on Exposure to Sustainability in Curricula and on Campus,” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 96–110, 2014, doi: 10.1080/15578771.2013.826752.[12] A. Tinker and R. Burt, “‘Greening’ the construction curriculum,” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 26–33, 2003.[13] ACCE, “Standards and criteria for accreditation of postsecondary
consideration of the open book examination," Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 11, no. 4-1, pp. 597-602, 1951.[3] A. Gharib, W. Phillips, and N. Mathew, "Cheat Sheet or Open-Book? A Comparison of the Effects of Exam Types on Performance, Retention, and Anxiety," Online Submission, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 469-478, 2012.[4] Y. Song and D. Thuente, "A quantitative case study in engineering of the efficacy of quality cheat-sheets," in 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2015: IEEE, pp. 1-7.[5] W. Chang and R. S. Shieh, "Exploration of the value of using a formula sheet for physics examinations," European Journal of Physics, vol. 34, no. 6, p. 1411, 2013.[6] I.-H. Hsiao and C. López, "Lessons
electricalengineering.6. AcknowledgmentThe authors greatly appreciate the support of the National Science Foundation under DUE #1915644. References[1] National Science Board, National Science Foundation, “The STEM Labor Force of Today:Scientists, Engineers and Skilled Technical Workers,” Science and Engineering Indicators 2022,NSB-2021-2, Alexandria, VA, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20212[2] M. Khalafalla et al., “The Role of Hands-On Engineering Technology Summer Camps inAttracting Underrepresented High School Students to STEM Majors,” in 2023 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, June 2023.[3] S. P. Jacobs, A. M. Allen, and L. W. Demoise, “Hands-On Science Activity in Digital
. instructor-assigned self-assigned # of students n=34 n=61 (ME, EE, CpE distribution) (22, 6, 6) (36, 13, 12) # of teams n=7 n=14 team size 4.86 ± 0.90 4.36 ± 1.01 student GPA (4.00 scale) 3.48 ± 0.44 3.39 ± 0.47 team average GPA (4.00 scale) 3.47 ± 0.23 3.38 ± 0.26 # of students abroad n=6 n=15 (% of students) (17.6%) (24.6%) # of teams with student(s) abroad n=4
to the students on the topic of service learning.Other course activities included a class presentation by Terri Crawford, JD, a Service Learning Fellow,and instructor in Black Studies at UNO, who introduced the topic and spoke with the students about thehistory of redlining in general, as well as the specific history of redlining in Omaha. One of thesignificant impacts of redlining in Omaha was the communities and neighborhoods that were displacedduring the construction of US Highway 75. The U. S. Department of Transportation estimates more than475,000 households and more than a million people were displaced nationwide because of the federalroadway construction and the City of Omaha was no exception. In 1954 that the State of Nebraska andthe
8,2018, https://psychcentral.com/news/2014/08/31/new-study-finds-cell-phone-addiction-increasingly-realistic-possibility/74312.html. [Accessed February 4, 2019].[3] S. Burhanli and G. Bangir-Alpan, “Why Do University Students Prefer YouTube to Learnand Study?,” Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, V16, N4, 2021.[4] S. Cook, “A comprehensive analysis of YouTube statistics in 2024,” January 11, 2024.Retrieved from https://www.comparitech.com/tv-streaming/youtube-statistics/ [Last AccessedFebruary 8, 2024].[5] C. Brame, “Effective Educational Videos: Principles and Guidelines for Maximizing StudentLearning from Video Content” CBE Life Sciences Education, 15:es6, pp. 1-6, December 1,2016.[6] A. D. Battistini, “Using Themes and Pop
. Furthermore, the hierarchical gradingscale provides more pathways for students to successfully pass a course. Educators interestedin using this mixed course design should consider the suggestions mentioned above in orderto more effectively run a flipped classroom and ensure proficiency, if not mastery, is achievedby all across all attempted modules.ReferencesAnderson, L. W. (1975). Major assumptions of mastery learning. In Annual Meeting of the Southeast Psychological Association.Bergmann, J. and Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. Flipped Learning Series. International Society for Technology in Education.Deddeh, H., Main, E., and Fulkerson, S. (2010). Eight steps to meaningful grading. The Phi Delta
Research Council Workshop onSuccessful STEM Education in K-12 Schools, National Academies, 2011.[3] E. Peters-Burton, S. Lynch, T. Behrend, and B. Means, “Inclusive STEM high school design:10 critical components,” in Theory into Practice, vol. 53(1), pp. 64-71, 2014.[4] R. Capraro and S. Slough, “Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? An introduction to STEMproject-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)approach,” in STEM project-based learning, pp. 1-5, 2013.[5] K. Lesseig, J. Firestone, J, Morrison, D, Slavit, and T. Holmlund, “An analysis of culturalinfluences on STEM schools: Similarities and differences across K-12 contexts,” in InternationalJournal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 17, no. 3, pp
. Toooften, educational institutions uphold hegemonic norms and the status quo. Howard et al.describe that “education has reinforced structures of disadvantage rather than challenging suchstructures,” adding that “education appears to maintain rather than change broad social andeconomic structures” [1, p. 2]. Carpini and Keeter describe service learning as “a collaborativeeffort to address a community problem” [2, p. 635]. Building off of Gervasoni et al.’s [1] andCarpini and Keeter’s [2] social justice lens—though they use the language of service learning—we have chosen the term community engagement rather than service learning to emphasize themutual benefit of the community and the students and to avoid the more deficit-basedperspective that
Strengthening the STEM Workforce, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2019. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/25257.[3] A. M. Núñez, S. Hurtado, C. E. Galdeano (Eds.), Hispanic-Serving Institutions: Advancing Research and Transformative Practice. New York: Routledge, 2015.[4] National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2019, Alexandria, VA, Special Report NSF 19-304, 2019. Available: https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd.[5] G. Crisp, A. Nora, A. Taggart, “Student characteristics, pre-college, college, and environmental factors as predictors of majoring in and earning a STEM
Glass Science in the Materials Engineering Curriculum. National Science Foundation.https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=2120156&HistoricalAwards=false[2] Donovan, Katrina J., et al. "Investigating Creativity, Confidence, and an Entrepreneurial Mindset through CurricularModification and Community Engagement." 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2023.[3] Donovan, K., & Kellar, J., & West, M., & Birrenkott, C., & Kellogg, S., & Mitchell, D., & Whitehead, M. (2022,August), Investigating the Impact of Arts on Student Learning by Introducing Glass Science in the Materials EngineeringCurriculum Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. https://peer.asee.org/42059
research plan that examines (a) potential changes instudents’ educational and career plans, (b) which elements of the APEX program most stronglyrelate to student outcomes, and (c) factors influencing instructor satisfaction with FLCs.The APEX program aims to deliver computing education to diverse community college students,better preparing them for today’s increasingly digital workplace. Continued expansion andassessment of the program will allow us to improve the experience of both students andinstructors, and to encourage nationwide adoption of embedding computing experiences intointroductory community college courses.References[1] R. W. Lent, S. Brown, and G. Hackett, “Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic
analysis of battery charge controllers for comparing three off-gridPV power plants," Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 11, p. e08331, 2021/11/01/, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08331.[2] M. Can Filibeli, et al., "Embedded web server-based home appliance networks," Journal of Network & Comp.Appl., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 499-514, 2007/04/01/, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2006.04.001.[3] M. K. Ghodki, "Microcontroller and solar power based electrical energy management system for renewableenergy applications," International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 852-860,2013/01/01/ 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.08.041.[4] H. S. a. U. B. a. K. Harismah, "Design, Construction and Testing of Portable
expansion of technical elective offerings that advancethe concepts introduced in the mandatory courses. The development of a continual improvementprocess is on-going and will continue to be shared with the software engineering educationcommunity.References[1] B. Tenbergen, S. Krusche, R. Hanna, M. Bano, “Software Engineering Education andTraining: Industry Demands, Curriculum Deficits, and Pedagogy Direction”, Focus: GuestEditors’ Introduction in IEEE Software, IEEE Computer Society, Nov/Dec 2023, pp. 36 – 39.DOI: 10.1109/MS.2023.3328465[2] K. A. Gary, R. Acuna, A. Mehlhase, R. Heinrichs, S. Sohoni, “Scaling to Meet the OnlineDemand in Software Engineering”, International Journal on Innovations in Online Education,vol. 4(1), pp. 1-26, 2020.[3
use of the ARCS model of instructional design,” Journal of instructional development, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 2–10, 1987.[8] S. Al-Qudah, J. Davishahl, E. Davishahl, and M. A. Greiner, “Investigation of sense of belonging to engineering in undergraduate introductory classes,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[9] E. Vanhala and J. Kasurinen, “Goals and Principles for the Redesign of a Programming Course,” in Workshop on PhD Software Engineering Education, CEUR-WS, 2018.[10] A. Forte and M. Guzdial, “Motivation and nonmajors in computer science: identifying discrete audiences for introductory courses,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 248–253, 2005.[11] E. K. Pullu and M. N. Gömleksiz
not directly used,the authors found them both insightful and helpful and are therefore citing them here [3]-[7].References [1] Overview of CATME Features. Available: https://info.catme.org/features/overview/. [Accessed: 3/31/2024]. [2] D.A. Kolb, “Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development,” FT press, 2014. [3] V. Sukack˙e, . A. O. P. de Carvalho Guerra, D. Ellinger, V. Carlos, S. Petronien˙e, L. Gaiˇzi¯unien˙e, S. Blanch, A. Marb`a-Tallada, A. Brose, “Towards Active Evidence-Based Learning in Engineering Education: A Systematic Literature Review of PBL, PjBL, and CBL,” in Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 21, 13955, 2022. [4] C. Herodotou, M. Sharples, M. Gaved, A. Kukulska-Hulme, B. Rienties
aligns with the loading test and falls within therange of reported laboratory tests as documented in the work of Yang et al12. Using theseparameters, the stability analysis indicates that the first mode of lateral buckling is produced with630 pounds, as shown in Figure 11-b. The lateral buckling from the laboratory test occurs with290 pounds, however the buckling shape is like the theory. The disparity between the predictedand observed loads is attributed to misalignment of the upper chord and other imperfectionsinherent in the construction process. 100 pounds a. Deflections under 100 s applied at center Mode 1: 630 pounds Mode 2: 680 pounds Mode 3: 710 pounds Mode 4: 890 pounds
range of student involvement in chemicalengineering.References[1] Landherr, Lucas. “Integrating Comics into Engineering Education to Promote Student Interest, Confidence, and Understanding.” Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education), 10 Sept. 2020, https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--32983. Accessed 28 Jan. 2024.[2] S. Madnani, “Why Chemical Engineering?,” Viterbi Voices, Apr. 27, 2020. https://viterbivoices.usc.edu/sheetal/chemical-engineering-why-i-chose-it-and-why-i- stayed/ (accessed Feb. 05, 2024).[3] “2021 Graduate Enrollment in Science, Engineering, and Health Fields at All-Time High as Postdocs Continue to Decline | NSF - National Science Foundation
, S. (2018). The imperative to move toward a dimension of care in engineering education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 938-961.Hartner-Tiefenthaler, M., Roetzer, K., Bottaro, G., & Peschl, M. F. (2018). When relational and epistemological uncertainty act as driving forces in collaborative knowledge creation processes among university students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 21-40Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995) Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4:1, 39-103, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2Jordan, M. E., & McDaniel, R. R. (2014). Managing Uncertainty During Collaborative Problem Solving in Elementary School Teams
acceptance and adoption among engineering students.References[1] S. Dawson, L. Heathcote, and G. Poole, "Harnessing ICT potential: The adoption and analysis of ICT systems for enhancing the student learning experience," International Journal of Educational Management, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 116-128, 2010.[2] K. Cook-Chennault and I. Villanueva, "Exploring perspectives and experiences of diverse learners' acceptance of online educational engineering games as learning tools in the classroom," ed: IEEE, 2020, pp. 1-9.[3] H. Taherdoost, "A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories," Procedia manufacturing, vol. 22, pp. 960-967, 2018.[4] A. Granić, "Educational Technology Adoption: A
learning approach in an academic engineering course," International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol. 13, pp. 273-288, 2003.[7] A. J. Duarte, B. Malheiro, E. Arnó, I. Perat, M. F. Silva, P. Fuentes-Durá, ..., and P. Ferreira, "Engineering education for sustainable development: the European project semester approach," IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 108-117, 2019.[8] R. Savage, K. Chen, and L. Vanasupa, "Integrating project-based learning throughout the undergraduate engineering curriculum," Journal of STEM Education, vol. 8, no. 3, 2008.[9] S. Palmer and W. Hall, "An evaluation of a project-based learning initiative in engineering education," European Journal of
References 1. Beyme, S., & Leung, C. (2009). Efficient computation of DFT of Zadoff-Chu sequences. Electronics Letters, 45(9), 461. https://doi.org/10.1049/el.2009.3330 2. Veletić, M., & Šunjevarić, M. (2014). On the Cramer-Rao lower bound for RSS-based positioning in wireless cellular networks. AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 68(8), 730–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2014.02.012 3. Li, G., Geng, E., Ye, Z., Xu, Y., Lin, J., & Pang, Y. J. (2018). Indoor positioning algorithm based on the improved RSSI distance model. Sensors, 18(9), 2820. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18092820 4. Machine Learning based indoor localization using Wi-Fi RSSI Fingerprints: an
devote $100,000 to students Students Field is receive more time to grant from diverse graduate diversified scholarships school backgroundsLet’s walk through what a very simple fleshed-out logic model might look like.Notice the overarching categories that we talked about before.In this case, we provide examples of these overarching categories to show what a logicmodel for a scholarship program might look like.Of course, many scholarship programs (like s-STEMs or NRTs) also have other programcomponents that we would need to include, probably as new rows in this table
, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://engineering.arizona.edu/[5] “STEMAP – Bridging science and society through innovative public engagement.” Accessed: Nov. 17, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://stemap.org/[6] “GOT Space – Georgia Space Grant Consortium.” Accessed: Nov. 17, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://gasgc.org/wp/gotspace/[7] C. Talbot, M. Alley, M. Marshall, C. Haas, S. Zappe, and J. Garner, “Engineering Ambassador Network: Professional Development of the Engineering Ambassadors,” in 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Atlanta, Georgia: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2013, p. 23.498.1-23.498.10. doi: 10.18260/1-2--19512.[8] H. L. Greene, P. E. Post, and L. Abrams, “Engineering Ambassador Program