standards [1] means inexorableinstrumentation and automation upgrades for old processes, and highly automated newprocesses. Environmental regulations, strict quality requirements and the constant drive toincrease manpower productivity reinforce this trend; processes without modern automation donot survive. The displacement of the middle skill worker, who in the process industry was thefloor operator responsible for one unit operation, has been happening gradually over the last 3-4decades, replaced by a control room operator who interacts with a control system operating manyunits. Implicitly this has transferred the responsibility for control of units and processes from theoperations staff to the engineering staff. An engineer wishing to build
initiative, Professional Ethics LIVE!, exists to help satisfy aneed for continuing education by licensed engineers and architects relative to their ethicalobligation to promote the public health, safety and welfare in the practice of their professions.For engineers in Texas, the statutory requirement for continuing education dates to 2003 when inresponse to a national movement, several state legislatures including Texas enacted rulesrequiring mandatory continuing education as part of an annual requirement for professionalengineer license renewal [1]. These rules require engineers to obtain 15 professionaldevelopment hours (PDHs) of continuing education annually, one hour of which must be in“professional ethics” or related topics. For architects, the
corporatetraining.Advanced DegreesProfessional development can come in the form of advanced degrees. A Masters or a Ph.D. canprovide specialized knowledge that can be of value in the workforce, either in technicalknowledge for a field or in management knowledge. The percentages of women earning upper-level degrees in engineering are low when compared to their male counterparts, leading tounderrepresentation in professor positions [1]. This may be because women finishing theirgraduate studies report feeling that women cannot get ahead and that they are overwhelmed bythe pressure of work [2]. However, obtaining an upper-level degree in engineering can lead tosalary increases and more compelling work [1]. An MBA specifically is important for careeradvancement and
design process focus, it isespecially important for the girls to provide their own answers, to recognize the value of failurein the iterative design process, and to learn to embrace it. Consequently, we changed ourcommunity involvement with the venue, and urban activity center, and with women of color inSTEM in the area. The instructional methodology and our data collection methods became morein-class, collaborative, and spontaneous. Our purpose is to mitigate the influence of the fear offailure (and boost self-efficacy) for underrepresented students, especially minority girls, and theirteachers.BackgroundGirls and women remain under-represented among students and within the workforce of STEM[1]. Minority women still make up a very small
modules, and theproject implementation details so that other institutions can either replicate or adapt to their needs.IntroductionThe landscape of engineering is continuously evolving. To tackle the rapidly changing needs ofthe broad engineering field, industries are looking for graduates with an ability to think at a systemslevel while at the same time possessing the hands-on hardware and software skills necessary tointerface at the sub-system level. Extant literature supports that both engineering faculty andstudents desire hands-on, system-level projects early on in an engineering curriculum (e.g. [1] [2]).Additional literature supports that training engineers in design-based thinking skills is useful inbuilding and motivating core technical
the features of modern CAD tools, includingfast collaboration and sharing. Though current introductory CAD courses are sufficient atteaching students how to use CAD, there is a recommendation for more cohesion and CADusage in advanced design courses. Allowing more usage of CAD in more comprehensive designdriven courses, can allow students to more accurately simulate the product development processin industry, and thus reduce the education to industry application gap.1.0 IntroductionAs the demand increases for more innovative products to help improve the lives of consumers,the Product 1/Industrial 2 Design Engineering (PIDE) industry continues to require more effectivedesign methodologies [1]. The PIDE space has seen massive investment over
Prevention Specialist with the Violence Prevention & Response team.Bianca Kaushal, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyKelley Marie Adams, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyProf. Paula T. Hammond, Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyMs. Sarah Rankin c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Promoting an Inclusive Lab Culture through Custom In-Person Trainings within an Engineering DepartmentCreating diverse, inclusive, and respectful environments is the #1 recommendation of the 2018National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report on “Sexual Harassment ofWomen” [1]. To accomplish this goal, the report suggests that academic
for manystudents. Especially as experiential learning becomes increasingly prevalent in curriculum designand further emphasized as an important educational tool, engineering technology is beginning togain traction as both a career path and a field of study, particularly among those seeking to spendless time in the classroom. For instance, in 2014, there were over 34,000 students who graduatedwith 2-year engineering technology degrees, versus 4,409 students who graduated with 2-yearengineering degrees, even though the number of graduates with 4-year engineering degreesremained substantially higher than those with 4-year engineering technology degrees [1].As this growth continues, it is increasingly evident that more research needs to be done
experiences for scientists and engineers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Evaluating Peer Coaching in an EngineeringCommunication Lab: A Quantitative Assessment ofStudents’ Revision ProcessesAbstract Communication is a crucial skillset for engineers, yet graduates [1]–[3] and theiremployers [4]–[8] continue to report their lack of preparation for effective communication uponcompletion of their undergraduate or graduate programs. Thus, technical communicationtraining merits deeper investigation and creative solutions. At the 2017 ASEE Meeting, weintroduced the MIT School of Engineering Communication Lab, a discipline-specific technicalcommunication service that is akin to a writing center, but
set by a CAD file or the operator. Values are usuallybased on the 3D cartisian system (XYZ).Overview of procedureMany different technologies can be used to solve the problem at hand. In this project, the groupthat is made up of RE, AM, and Metrology are used (Fig. 1). RE will be carried out by a 3DArtec Spider Optical Scanner and Inventor 2018 by Autodesk. AM will be carried out by aDimension 1200 es 3D Printer. The metrology will be carried out by the Hexagon Global SCoordinate Measuring Machine (CMM). AMPrototype Metrology REpart ofpart comparison (Figure 1: Rapid Manufacturing
Paper ID #30435devices and systems. Her work considers the intentional and unintentional consequences of durable struc-tures, products, architectures, and standards in engineering education, to pinpoint areas for transformativechange. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Real-World Examples and Sociotechnical Integration – What’s the Connection?IntroductionIn the U.S., engineers are often taught in ways that prioritize the technical aspects of problemswhile neglecting or deemphasizing any social considerations. Such privileging of the technicalcan lead to an inaccurate portrayal of the sociotechnical complexities of engineering problemsolving in the workforce [1
) [1]. As noted in the definition, community engagement is a dynamic relational processrather than a static transaction of services.Prior literature within engineering education research shows that community engagement is anorientation that is often valued within the engineering domain [2-5]. National networks such asEPICS [5, 6] and Engineers Without Borders (EWB) [4, 7] have provided frameworks andtraining to integrate a focus on community engagement through designing engineering projects.And indeed, the first-year engineering design course that is the focus of the present paper was,itself, adapted from the Purdue EPICS program based on the lead author’s previous experiencesof instruction and course administration in the program. Some have
capstone design for improving engineering students with multidimensional capabilities Zhinan Zhang1, Houzhi Liu1, Lu Chen1, Yaxin Huang2, Jiabin Zhu2 1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 2. Graduate School of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240Abstract: Capstone design, as the last and vital teaching procedure for students, provideopportunities for them to comprehensively apply knowledge and skills they have learnedand therefore is widely conducted by colleges and universities to enhance students’integrative competence. A well-designed capstone design course plays a vital role inmeeting both the criteria of ABET and the New Engineering Education in China
invent after the program. These findings support the limited body of research on studentoutcomes associated with participation in InVenture programs, and offers unique insights intothe outcomes associated with turning a school-based invention education program into a one-week summer program in an out-of-school-time context.IntroductionIn recent decades, invention education programs have been posited as a way to engage studentsin STEM through the hands-on process of designing their own inventions [1]. The K-12InVenture Prize (IP) is an example of one such program, offering a platform for school-basedinvention education designed to be implemented during the academic year [2]. The programoperates in partnership with the Georgia Institute of
Haven Ron Harichandran is Dean of the Tagliatela College of Engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Relationship between Gen Z Engineering Students’ Personality Types and Topics of Technical InterestIntroduction In this paper we build upon a preliminary work in progress reported last year [1]. A popularpersonality assessment tools is the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® (MBTI) test [2]. In thisindicator, people are classified according to 16 different personality types. Results of the MBTIself-assessment test indicates whether the person tends to be sensing (S) or intuitive (N),thinking (T) or feeling (F), judging (J) or perceiving (P), and extroverted (E) or
undergraduate (MET 4173) class as well as through the hands-on training sessions and certification (level 1 to 4) in the Endeavor Digital Manufacturing Maker Space.Ms. Pragya Niraula, Oklahoma State University Pragya Niraula is a graduate student in Industrial Engineering and Management at Oklahoma State Uni- versity (OSU). She earned a MS degree in Energy Engineering at Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand in 2016 and BS degree in Mechanical Engineering at Tribhuwan University, Nepal in 2010. She has been associated with OSU Industrial Assessment Center since 2017 and has participated in 25 energy assessment in industrial manufacturers. Her area of interest includes energy management, continuous improvement, maximizing
2020.There are some universities offering four years degree in the field of Renewable EnergyEngineering Technology (REET). In this paper author’s experience in teaching courses in REETprogram, typical student senior projects, and job market forecast for this field will be discussed.The assessment data for the REET senior project was analyzed. Several recommendations forimproving student’s outcomes are suggested.1- IntroductionWhy Study Alternative/Renewable Technologies?Alternative energy is referring to sources of energy that replace fuel sources without theundesired consequences. Fossil fuel burning produces pollution. Nuclear power is a commonalternative to fossil fuels however, radiation and the long-term containment cause great concernand
practices of academics in civil and environmental engineering, the findings ofwhich are summarized in a report [1].Established in 1885, Georgia Tech is a public research university with over 23,000 students andan $824 million in R&D expenditures. Georgia Tech’s engineering programs have beenconsistently ranked within the top 5 in the U.S. Georgia Tech plays a leading role in the state’seconomic development strategy. Research is conducted for industry and government by theapplied research division of Georgia Tech, various academic schools and departments, and morethan 100 interdisciplinary research units.The School of Aerospace Engineering at Georgia Tech is ranked among the top 5 aerospaceengineering programs in the country. The school focuses
bring students from across the country to auniversity campus for the summer. These students learn how to conduct real research in theirdiscipline by actually doing it, under the supervision of a faculty mentor. Many students whoparticipate in REU programs remember these programs long after the program is complete. TheREU experience of working with a faculty mentor on bona fide research is undoubtedly key tothe educational and career planning benefits that students enjoy. The best REU experiencestypically don’t happen by accident. They must be deliberately planned. Despite the importanceof this component of REU programs, minimal literature related REU social programs exists.This paper considers what makes a strong REU social program.1
the Calculus sequence. Anextensive survey of the many studies that have been done to investigate this problem can be foundin [1]. Many students who could have otherwise been very successful engineers leave thediscipline demoralized and with a sense of inadequacy. A large percentage of students affectedare first generation college students, women and minorities. This is not a good situation as theprofession loses valuable talents who could be very successful engineers.The traditional method of calculus teaching emphasized building mathematical intellect and skillsthrough rigor and hard work, in a way quite similar to athletic training. During the 1980s, a greatdebate started about whether and how the failure and attrition rates in calculus
, taught at UAF as a junior level class (ME450, Fundamentals of Flight), leaves incomingfreshmen with a large gap in devising how things fly. To close this gap the club leaned on onlineresources; providing watch lists of online videos from content creators like Flite Test. In only a fewhours of study members gained a practical understanding of where to place a plane’s center of gravity aswell as what characteristics were needed for stable flight. Applying the knowledge, membersconstructed foam gliders and tested them by holding a competition to see which team could glide thelongest. Figure 1: Flight testing early prototypes for basic aerodynamics feedbackFor every year prior to 2020, one of the biggest design challenges in the
designed considering theEbbinghaus’ Forgetting Curve, to provide students with learning opportunities in 6-day cycles:(i) day 1: a pre-class learning activity (reading or video) and a quiz; (ii) day 2: in-class Kahootlow-stakes quiz with discussion, a short lecture with embedded time for problem-solving anddiscussion, and in-class activities (labs, group projects); (iii) day 4: homework due two days afterthe class; (iv) day 6: homework self-reflection (autopsy based on provided solutions) two daysafter homework is due. The assessment of course performance is based on the well-characterized force concept inventory (FCI) exam that is administered before the intro tomechanics course and both before and after the Physics I course; and on student
Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Results of Integrating a Makerspace into a First-Year Engineering ClassIntroductionThis Complete Evidence-Based Practice paper explores the integration of makerspace lessonsand projects into a first-year Introduction to Engineering class. Beginning in 2013, the studybody representing traditional students starting their degrees immediately following high schoolbegan to switch from Millennials to Generation Z (Gen Z). As our student population changes,their interests and characteristics should influence our teaching pedagogy. Seemiller found thatstudents prefer to work independently, involving others only when necessary [1]. Cruz found thatover half of the
” group, led by the secondauthor. The group provided a forum for brainstorming ideas and the course provided a platformfor testing these strategies. Four recommendations evolved from this effort: 1.) Education onteam function and bias in team dynamics is helpful. 2.) Teamwork skills and strategies forcollaboration and conflict resolution need to be taught. 3.) Mentoring and engaging withstudents is an important aspect of the process and can be enhanced to better serve women. 4.)Reflection and self-assessment exercises can be integrated to build self-efficacy and confidencein students. Assessment was done using data collected from mid-term evaluations, peerevaluations, self-assessment exercises, input from industry judges, and teaching evaluations
fluctuation is specifically related to an extremeexpansion in the fields of science and technology. The growing global market competition, thesubsequent restructuring of industry, the visible transformation from defense to civilian work, theutilization of new materials and biological processes, and the explosion of informationtechnology (both as part of the engineering process and as part of its product) has dramaticallyand irreversibly altered how mechanical engineers operate [1]. In the midst of these evolvingtimes, it has become noticeably apparent that there is a considerable disconnect between whatindustries need from the matriculated students they hire and what undergraduate mechanicalengineering education actually provides [2]. The primary
materials and the characterization and modeling of their material properties. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 RIEF: Mapping the Development of Leadership Skills for Undergraduate Engineering Students in Leadership PositionsMotivation There is a strong economic argument to increase racial and gender diversity of executiveleadership in companies. Researchers found that greater ethnic/cultural and gender diversity ofexecutive leadership teams correlated to financial outperforming other companies by 33% and21% respectively [1]. In addition, leadership skills are considered as key for those entering theworkforce [2]. In general, leadership formation has been widely studied for
-structuredinterviews with 10 international students from the general engineering department in a singleuniversity in the South of the U.S. Our results account for the patterns that emerged from thedata including socio-cultural adaptability, making friends, working in teams, and orientationstructuration.Keywords: International Students, First-Year, Social Interaction, Sociocultural TheoryIntroductionAcademic migration is on the rise and involves students migrating to foreign countries in searchof education. According to Contreras-Aquirre and Gonzalez [1], students are becoming morewilling to move, travel, and pursue a degree in a foreign country. The Institute for InternationalEducation [2] infographics portray that the United States (U.S.), Canada
Subjects + Topics th 6 grade (adaptable for K-MS) Engineering, Sustainability, Density Resources Student Learning Outcomes ● Rosie Revere, Engineer by Andrea Beaty Next Generation Science Standards: ● 100 Under $100: One Hundred Tools for Empowering Global MS-ETS1-1 Engineering Design: Define the criteria and constraints of Women by Betsy Teutsch a design problem with sufficient precision to ensure a successful ● The Questioneers (found at questioneers.com) solution, taking
: Supporting Community College Transfer Pathways and Access to High Impact Practices during Transfer TransitionAbstractWhile scholarships help reduce the financial burden of higher education, scholarships alone donot increase STEM bachelor degree completion by low-income academically talentedstudents. Developing strategies to support STEM transfer students is key [1], [2], [3] as isengaging students in high-impact practices such as internships and undergraduate research [4].We share approaches developed in our National Science Foundation Scholarships for Science,Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (NSF S-STEM) program to support student successand to increase access to research and internship opportunities
enrollment data show thatthe scalability of these approaches has caused a shift of all instruction in our program to these newinstructional modes.1 IntroductionInternational graduate students are important for many universities in the United States, the Euro-pean Union, Great Britain, and Australia [1], in part to offset enrollment challenges at the under-graduate level [2]. Maintaining international enrollments has been challenging due to the currentgeopolitical environment [3]. Therefore, universities have put significant efforts into recruitinginternational graduate students.New technologies in education have enabled universities to reach international students beyondthose who are seeking a residential experience. Asynchronous online education is