: Barriers and opportunities for integrating sociotechnical thinking into diverse engineering courses. Research paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL.[15] Leydens, J. A., Johnson, K., Claussen, S., Blacklock, J., Moskal, B. M., & Cordova, O. (2018). Measuring change over time in sociotechnical thinking: A survey/validation model for sociotechnical habits of mind. Research paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT.
flourish, it should be kept in mind that resources provided to school promote practices oftechnological and engineering literacy while also remaining relevant and appropriately challenging.Resources Universities, industries, and community-based STEM partnerships are important resources of materials andinformation as identified through supported research and student responses. STEM partnerships support teachers andschools through the provision of equipment and curriculum. Student responses to the e-dragster project support thatpartnership-provided instructions and materials, along with an opportunity for collaboration with peers were themost helpful resources during experience. Opening access to these experiences through a STEM
Paper ID #37331Impact of an Emerging Scholars/Peer-Led Team Learning Program on theRecruitment of Undergraduate Women and Underrepresented Minorities intoComputer Science and MathematicsDr. Rita Manco Powell, University of Pennsylvania Rita Manco Powell received her Ed.D. from the University of Pennsylvania in 2005. She has worked for over 20 years in Penn Engineering, first in the Department of Computer and Information Science and recently in the Office of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, to develop programs and initiatives to recruit women and underrepresented minorities into computer science and to retain them. Powell was Co
. Thestudents who use it for a communal connection point primarily benefit from having likemindedpeers, however, notably do not regularly engage with personal projects, instead using it as astudy space where they can be louder and have off topic conversations. The largest benefits tothis group derive not necessarily from practicing hard skills, but being surrounded by like-minded peers who support their classwork and share similar interests. The second group ofstudents who use the space for specific tasks make up the majority of the engineering andpersonal projects that move through the space, and are notably less communicative than thesocial students. Aside from specific personal connections like partners or friends helping on theproject, these
ofstudents’ undergraduate engineering programs. To accomplish this, many technical skills mustbe strengthened and reinforced—such as Computer Aided Design, Finite Element Analysis andother simulation tools, experimental testing, and design validation—as well as durable skills suchas teamwork, communication, and project management [20].With these challenges in mind, our previous study examined the development and assessment ofa two-semester junior-year Machine Design course sequence and, in particular, a year-long teamdesign project spanning both courses [14]. Briefly, the scope of the design project is to build aMonoblock Pill Bottle Filling Station, shown in Figure 1. The purpose of this machine is to takeempty pill bottles loaded in bulk, fill
Paper ID #37839Work in Progress: Implementing a Tiger Team in a Capstone Design CourseProf. Alan Cheville, Bucknell University Alan Cheville studied optoelectronics and ultrafast optics at Rice University, then spent fourteen years as a faculty member at Oklahoma State University working on terahertz frequencies and engineering education, developing resources in photonics and engineering design. After serving for two and a half years as a program director in engineering education at the National Science Foundation, served as chair in the Electrical & Computer Engineering Department and secretary of the faculty at
engineering activities [44], middle, grade level engineering learning experiences,learning interaction, student conceptions of engineering changes, educators/pre-collegeengineering education, and Matusovich et at. [46] integrated civil engineering with social aspects[46]. It was not until 2021 that Holly [39] wrote that the following words more clearly signify thetendency of engineering and CRP like engineering educators; these include pre-collegeengineering education, engineering student, the engineering community, pre-college engineeringlearning experience, engineering teaching, engineering learning interaction, to learn engineering,engineering habits of mind, engineering ecosystems, conceptions of engineering,multidimensional of engineering
Paper ID #38985Board 185: Work in Progress: Engaging Students in the UN SustainableDevelopment Goals through Funds of Knowledge: A Middle School BilingualClassroom Case StudyLuis E Montero-Moguel, The University of Texas at San Antonio Luis Montero is a Ph.D. student in Interdisciplinary Learning and Teaching at the University of Texas at San Antonio, currently in his second year of study. He earned his Master’s degree in Mathematics Teach- ing from the University of Guadalajara in Mexico and his Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Technological Institute of Merida, also in Mexico. With 11 years of
. Due toCOVID and the heavier workload it entails, this option was only taken by a very smallpercentage of the class. In general, we found that if an extended learning opportunity such as thehonors section required a lot of time, it was to be expected that a small number of students wouldchoose this path, due to the already rigorous engineering curriculum. The second optional pathwas an extra credit learning module and quiz on multitasking, which all students in the classwere encouraged to complete. When creating this optional module, we were mindful of allstudents in the course, especially those who are already struggling, by choosing a gradingscheme carefully and emphasizing that the module was an extended learning opportunity, not
shares knowledge, teaches, and relates whatwe have learned via metaphors and narratives. Even our own identity in the world can be thoughtof as a narrative in our minds, and to imagine our future selves we must construct a futurenarrative. It is this power of story that we believe needs to be fundamentally embraced bydiversity efforts in engineering and computing to make a significant change in our demographicchallenges. And yet, the power of story is left, mostly, unexplored in engineering as it does not fitwith our STEM-focused fields that sit strongly in the camps of quantitative evidence, testing, anddesign.We will argue in this paper, that there is convincing evidence that leveraging the power of storymight be the “holy grail” for changing
integration of the otherdomains as well as for the skills and knowledge associated with those domains. Thus, we usedthe characteristics of engagement were comprised by Cunningham and Kelly’s (2017) epistemicpractices of engineering in this study because they are reflective of the nature of engineering,specific to the habits of mind reflected in the Framework for P12 Engineering Learning, butgeneral enough to be more likely to arise in the interviews. The three groups of stakeholderswhose views were examined in this study are not engineers and it was unlikely that theirreflections on STEM engagement would be specific enough for the Framework (2020) to be themost meaningful descriptors of their views. For example, it was unlikely that the community
Paper ID #38654Board 88: Work in Progress: Impact of Electronics Design Experience onNon-majors’ Self-efficacy and IdentityTom J. Zajdel, Carnegie Mellon University Tom Zajdel is an Assistant Teaching Professor in electrical and computer engineering at Carnegie Mellon University. Dr. Zajdel is interested in how students become motivated to study electronics and engineer- ing. He has taught circuits, amateur radio, introductory mechanics, technical writing, and engineering de- sign. Before joining CMU, Tom was a postdoctoral researcher at Princeton University, where he worked on electrical sheep-herding of biological
Professor of Instruction with the Bioengineering Department, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pa. Her past research interests have included Biomechanics, primarily focusing on spine- related injuries and degeneration. Currently, her research interest are in engineering education specifically with design thinking process and student motivation. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Developing Design Thinking in Senior Capstone Bioengineering Students Department of Bioengineering, Temple University, Philadelphia, PAIntroductionAccreditation is important for ensuring that institutions of higher education meet acceptableuniversal standards for developing graduates. These
this approach.Program DescriptionThe WiSTEM program provides academic support in mathematics and computerprogramming, gives opportunities for students to practice mathematics andprogramming on real-world project modules that have societal and cultural relevance,provides a cohort experience with other like-minded individuals, and offers a safespace for students to tackle issues they are likely to confront as a marginalized groupin STEM. The program contains a summer bridge experience and academic-yearlearning community for students majoring in the physical sciences, environmentalscience, mathematics, computer science, and engineering. WiSTEM uses evidence-based practices that increase persistence in STEM like incorporating multiple forms
Paper ID #38789Stigma of mental health conditions within engineering culture and itsrelation to help-seeking attitudes: Insights from the first year of alongitudinal study ˜ University at Buffalo, The State University of New YorkMatilde Luz S´anchez-Pena, Dr. Matilde S´anchez-Pe˜na is an assistant professor of Engineering Education at University at Buffalo – SUNY where she leads the Diversity Assessment Research in Engineering to Catalyze the Advancement of Respect and Equity (DAREtoCARE) Lab. Her research focuses on the development of cultures of care and wellbeing in engineering education spaces
Paper ID #37181A Narrative Literature Review: The Interplay of Motivational Theory andCognition in STEM EducationMr. Alexander V. Struck Jannini, Purdue University, West Lafayette Alexander is a third-year PhD Student in the Engineering Education Department at Purdue University. His main research focus is on applying motivational theories within STEM education, and is looking towards developing a motivational theory that accounts for student cognition and cultural backgrounds.Dr. Muhsin Menekse, Purdue University, West Lafayette Muhsin Menekse is an Assistant Professor at Purdue University with a joint appointment in the School
Paper ID #39775Neurocognitive Examination of the Impact of Design ProjectRepresentation on Student Motivation and PerformanceCorey James Kado, Florida Polytechnic University He is a junior-level student at Florida Polytechnic University, majoring in Mechanical Engineering. He is a Student Research Assistant under Dr. Elisabeth Kames, focusing on Design Neurocognition.Elisabeth Kames, Florida Polytechnic University Dr. Elisabeth Kames is an Assistant Professor at Florida Polytechnic University. Her research focuses on engineering design and manufacturing, including pedagogical approaches. She is also interested in the impact
Paper ID #38129Exploring Institutional Retention Support Initiatives for RetainingWomen of Color STEM FacultyDr. Tonisha B. Lane, Virginia Tech Dr. Lane’s research agenda broadly examines diversity, equity, and inclusion in postsecondary educa- tion with the objective of advancing inclusive and transformative policies and practices. Her primary research strand investigates the experiences and outcomes of underrepresented groups in science, tech- nology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Using qualitative methodologies, she has explored access and success for underserved students of color in STEM and STEM intervention
eye, see how they fit within that picture. For thosewho felt that they fit the engineering mold, an uncanny confidence came through when theywould define what engineering is and how they saw themselves in engineering. The opposite wasfound for those who did not fit the mold or believed themselves not to. “Um, the reason why I wanna become an engineer, um, just basically be able to use creativity towards exploration where I can actually feel like I'm actually using my mind and my creativity. Not just sitting down, doing office work being a robot, you know, I just wanna basically be part of the future. Just like, uh, Okay. I'll just say, just my personal thing. Um, I just feel like it's part of the future where
1Examining The Differences In Grade Point Average For Engineering Students Enrolled In Entrepreneurial Education ProgramsAbstract Undergraduate students in engineering continue to gain exposure to entrepreneurialprogramming through different entrepreneurship education programs (EEPs) initiated in highereducation institutions. While traditionally, entrepreneurship education has been initiated andhoused in business schools; recent programmatic offerings have increased in the engineeringschools. Through various offerings (e.g., full-credit courses and seminars), engineering EEPsfocus on developing entrepreneurially-minded engineering graduates to prepare them to succeedin their future career roles. While research in entrepreneurship
website with theperceptions of KEEN legacy leaders to establish a baseline for further exploration. A contentanalysis of the site was undertaken, followed by interviews of KEEN legacy leaders to ascertaintheir perceptions of each C and their reactions to each C’s conceptualization obtained from thecontent analysis. This information will be used to determine the most appropriate search termsfor each C when performing a future scoping literature review and eventual Delphi study.Literature ReviewThe need for entrepreneurially-minded individuals to contribute to the growing needs of societyhas prompted growth in engineering EM education research over the past two decades [5], [13]–[15]. Educators have designed EM interventions encouraging engineering
training modules to reduce theload on faculty . While mentorship is important to the success of undergraduates in research,Davis et al. point out that faculty will not be encouraged to participate in mentoringundergraduates unless there is perceived institutional support for this activity.Research and Entrepreneurially Minded LearningBoth faculty and students need to connect research with the concepts of EML, or morespecifically curiosity, connections and creating value. Research and engineering education areoften thought of as separate topics but they are linked. Involvement in research, for eitherstudents or faculty, addresses the need to develop curiosity and the ability to ask the rightquestion. KEEN [12] developed a framework to supplement
Paper ID #40088Work in Progress: Examining the Impact of a Faculty Development Programin Engineering Instructors’ Teaching Practices and Perceptions on ActiveLearning MethodologiesGianina Morales, University of Pittsburgh and Universidad de Valparaiso, Chile Gianina Morales is a Faculty at the Universidad de Valpara´ıso, Chile. She has an M. Ed degree and is currently a Fulbright Ph.D. student at the School of Education at the University of Pittsburgh. Her research focuses on disciplinary literacy in engineering and the improvement of instructional practices to foster persistence and equity in undergraduate engineering
,thewaysinwhichwedesignthecurriculumneedtochange. Perhapsfacilitatingmultidisciplinaryorinterdisciplinarynotonlyinengineeringeducationbutalsoinbroadereducation,aswellastheshiftfromclassroomteachingtomorestudent-centricandproject-basedlearninghasreachedaconsensus.Whileclassroomteachingisanefficientapproachtodeliverdiscipline-based knowledge and methods, the effectiveness of high-level knowledge learning and required skillspreparingforstudentsisstillbeingchallenged(deGraaffetal.,2007).Atthesametime,thefoundationofscienceandmathematicsinengineeringremainssignificant,thevalueofengineeringdesignandpractices,aswellascommunicationsandteamworkarestillfeaturedheavily.Therefore,theredesignofengineeringeducation needs to borrow the idea of “engineering habit of mind” while our education preparing
Paper ID #40092Mechatronics Engineering Integrate Project: An Approach in Project-BasedLearning with the Subjects of Instrumentation, Control Systems, andMicrocontrollersProf. Fernando Silveira Madani, Centro Universit´ario Instituto Mau´a de Tecnologia Fernando Silveira Madani received the B.S (1998) in Mechatronics Engineering from the Univ. Paulista – Brazil, the M.S. (2002) and Ph.D. (2010) from the Aeronautical Institute of Technology (ITA) - Brazil. In 2002, he joined the faculty of the Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Mau´a Institute of Technology – Brazil, where he is currently as a full professor and Head of the
engineering Ph.D. students is 60%, compared to 55% for HispanicAmericans, 53% for Asian Americans, and 47% for African Americans (Kerlin, 1995). In 2008,the Council for Graduate Schools reported a quantitative study tracking attrition and persistence,noting that graduate attrition in engineering is between 24%-36% for men and women inengineering, respectively (Sowell, 2008). More recently, in 2015, Sowell, Allum, and Okahanareported data disaggregated for graduate engineering men and women of color, noting alarmingstatistics for most traditionally underrepresented groups, including that ten-year completion ratesfor African American engineering graduate students, are only 48% (Sowell et al., 2015). Withthese statistics in mind, it is not unreasonable
who holds true to the social/technical divide and is an able-bodied, cis-gender, and heterosexual man, workplace norms and incentive structures are designedwith these people in mind, systematically disenfranchising queer engineers.Later steps in addressing equity in this space would include engendering gender equity intoengineering culture and ways of doing and considering the ways in which engineering culture’sassumptions about gender are structurally embedded in our education systems and workforce– notonly recognizing the importance of diversity in the field but also ensuring the importantdifferentiation of support structures so that engineering can become a more level playing field. Inother words, in order for all engineers to feel
approach of Experiential Learning (EL), Entrepreneurial Mindset(EM), and real-world application using the entrepreneurially minded curriculum, for engineeringand technology courses.The purpose of this study is to highlight findings and lessons learned because of integrating anentrepreneurially minded interdisciplinary project (including bio-inspired design and STEAM)into the engineering technology classroom. Specifically, curriculum changes were implementedinto a course on programming industrial robots (as part of the minor in robotics). This course isdesigned for teaching technology students how to install, maintain, and work with industrialrobots through real-world applications. This course also assists students in discovering thecapability of
JHU attended the AspireSummer Institute (ASI), an immersive professional development experience for faculty offeredby the NSF Eddie Bernice Johnson INCLUDES Aspire Alliance. Through this training, CMUand JHU embraced identity-affirming mentorship as a strategy to address the color evasiveperspective of their engineering schools that overlooks racial differences and emphasizessameness [2]. The two schools also developed a draft action plan that focused on building eachschool’s capacity to be equity-minded using the Inclusive Professional Framework for Faculty(IPF). Following the ASI, CMU, JHU, and NYU began meeting weekly to share learnings fromthe institute, discuss policies and practices related to faculty advancement at each institution
identities, which previous research showed was important for successfullynavigating STEM as a female student (Rice & Alfred, 2014). All three women enthusiastically acceptedtheir place amongst like-minded scientists, engineers, and mathematicians and thrived in academicsettings that were supportive of their own interests and professional goals. For instance, Esperanzaexpressed how it felt to be in a community of engineers as a first-generation student. “I did that summerprogram here through the multicultural program and I just fell in love with the community. And all theother kids that I met, like I hadn’t really found a group in high school that was interested in engineering.And so, to come here and find a group, of multicultural people