Conference Session

Track 3: Technical Session 1: Bridging Educational Equity Gaps: A Systematic Review of AI-Driven Tools for Students Living with Disabilities in Engineering and STEM Education

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Kevin Zhongyang Shao, University of Washington; Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Eric Kyeong-Min Cho, University of Washington; Sophia Tang, University of Washington; Hanlin Ma, University of Washington; Sep Makhsous, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

methodology. Table 2. Review of technologies being used in STEM education for SLWD.Author(s) Country Technologies Purpose Target Group Education Designedand Year Level Solution/MethodologyIatraki et al., Greece Virtual Investigate the design issues Intellectual Primary Employed a focus group(2021) [21] Reality/Augmented in the development of digital disability (ID) methodology to explore the Reality (VR/AR) learning environments for

Collection

2020 ASEE North Midwest Section Annual Conference

Authors

Ann M Gansemer-Topf, Iowa State University; Qing Li, Iowa State University; Shan Jiang, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Gül E. Kremer, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Nigel Forest Reuel, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Rebecca Mort

management skills. The multiple approaches for designing a study and analyzing data are useful as weconsider our development of formative and summative assessments. Each methodology has itsstrengths and limitations. Understanding how others have designed their research studies and theimplications for these choices will assist us as we undertake our own research and assessmentactivities.Results Our review of the results captured a significant amount of information related to thedevelopment and assessment of project management. In this section we highlight those resultsmost closely applicable to our project and which can inform other research related to this topic. Shuman et al.’s (2005) work provides a significant number of

Collection

2023 Fall Mid Atlantic Conference: Meeting our students where they are and getting them where they need to be

Authors

Rajarajan Subramanian, Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg, The Capital College; Sofia M Vidalis, Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg, The Capital College

experience. He includedmechanisms for both rote learning and generalization and eventually his machine won one game against aformer Connecticut checkers champion.An important aspect of intelligence is the ability to reason logically, and it has always been a major focusof AI development. In 1955-56, Allen Newell and Herbert Simon wrote a “theorem-proving program”that portrayed the reasoning aspect of AI. At some point, a proof written by the theorem-proving programwas more elegant than the proof given in the books. In 1969, man landed on the moon surface because of the calculations made by series of computers thatwere used in the space programs. In the year 1997, IBM 's Deep Blue computer made history when itbecame the first digital computer to win

Collection

2022 ASEE Gulf Southwest Annual Conference

Authors

Olatunde A, Adeoye, Prairie View A&M University; shuza Binzaid; John Okyere Attia P.E., Prairie View A&M University

elevation height and shorter tower. Introduction Wind energy harvesting systems have gained significant attention in exploiting wind energyin recent times. According to WoodMac [1], the world-installed wind power capacity is projected tobe over 1,756 GW by 2030, with an increasing cumulative annualized growth rate (CAGR) of 9%between 2021 and 2030 [1]. Because wind energy is sustainable, clean, and does produce greenhouseemissions and U. S is planning to generate 20% of its electric power from wind energy by 2030 [2].According to the Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC) 2021 report [3], the installed wind powercapacity was 743 GW in 2021, which prevented over 1.1 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Megan McSpedon, Rice University; Margaret Beier, Rice University; Brittany Bradford, Rice University; Michael Wolf

: Learners, contexts, and cultures. She is a fellow of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychologists (SIOP) and a fellow of the Association for Psychological Science (APS).Brittany Bradford Research Analyst, OpenStax, Rice University © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com The development of collegiate STEM self-efficacy: A longitudinal study of first-year studentsAbstractThis NSF S-STEM Grantee poster examines the longitudinal impact the Rice Emerging ScholarsProgram (RESP), Rice University’s comprehensive science, technology, engineering, and math(STEM) summer bridge program, has on student

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brittany Fasy; Joseph Chipps, Montana State University - Bozeman; Stacey Hancock, Montana State University - Bozeman; Aayushi Dangol; Kristin Searle, Utah State University; Colby Tofel-Grehl, Utah State University; Aubrey Rogowski, Utah State University; Mengying Jiang, Utah State University

seventh and eigth grades (e.g., by expanding on the use and types of communication protocols).Acknowledgements This material is based upon work supported by the National ScienceFoundation under Grant No. NSF DRL 2031795 (MSU) and DRL 2031279 (USU). Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s)and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References [1] The art of storytelling: Background information for teachers. [Online]. Available: https://mhs.mt.gov/education/IEFA/BackgroundInformation.pdf [2] The art of storytelling: Plains indian persectives. [Online]. Available: https://mhs.mt.gov/education/PictographicArt [3] Montana cs standards

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division (CONST) Technical Session 5

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tolulope Ibilola Ogundare; Rebecca Kassa, University of Kansas; Omar Maali, City of Lawrence, Kansas; Brian Lines, The University of Kansas; Jake Smithwick, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Kenneth Timothy Sullivan, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering Division (CONST)

skills in the following areasare needed to effectively manage construction projects: teamwork, leadership, communication,conflict management, motivation, and trust building [10] [16].Some of these soft skills are correlated with personality traits in past studies. Using the Big Fivepersonality assessment model, [7] discovered that project managers that had the openness toexperience and conscientiousness traits possess the inborn abilities to be good leaders, do not onlydemonstrate concern for projects but would take corresponding actions to ensure project goals areachieved. [13]’s study compared the personality traits of construction workers using the HEXACOPersonality Model. The study found that field leaders had lower inquisitiveness than

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division (IND) Technical Session 4

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sara C. Vick, Mississippi State University; Lesley Strawderman P.E., Mississippi State University; Brian K. Smith, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

Industrial Engineering Division (IND)

: www.annualreviews.org[3] R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown, and G. Hackett, “Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance,” J Vocat Behav, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 79–122, Aug. 1994, doi: 10.1006/JVBE.1994.1027.[4] C. Carrico, H. Matusovich, and M. C. Paretti, “A Qualitative Analysis of Career Choice Pathways of College-Oriented Rural Central Appalachian High School Students:,” J Career Dev, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 94–111, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1177/0894845317725603.[5] H. Matusovich, R. A. Streveler, and R. L. Miller, “Why do students choose engineering? A qualitative, longitudinal investigation of students’ motivational values,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 289–303

Conference Session

COED Modulus Topics

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adam Steven Weaver, Utah State University; Jack Elliott, Utah State University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education Division (COED)

engineering educators to research more holisticstudent networks than previously studied. Results of these future studies may yield moregeneralizable and accurate conclusions about which social practices help students succeed.Acknowledgements This material is based upon work supported by the second author's National ScienceFoundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. DGE1745048. Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. References[1] A. Kozulin, Vygotsky’s Psychology: A biography of ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.[2

Conference Session

Mathematics Division (MATH) Technical Session 2

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gianluca Guadagni, University of Virginia; Deepyaman Maiti, University of Virginia; Farzad Shafiei Dizaji

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mathematics Division (MATH)

choose the grading option before the end of the semester at a specific deadline: 04/28/2020, 11/06/2020, or 04/30/2021. All deadlines, even in Spring 21, were before Final Exams.Description of SurveyOur study participants (second, third-, and fourth-year students who had taken at least one APMA course)completed a ~50-question online survey [1] early in Spring 22 semester about their experiences in APMAcourse(s) from Spring 20 to Spring 21 semesters. Survey questions were related to demographic data,motivation, technological tools/ applications used, office hours, help sessions, quizzes/tests in an onlinesetting, grading options, and questions comparing APMA courses with major-related core courses.Analysis Methods, Results, and

Conference Session

Self-Regulation and Learning

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Taiwo Raphael Feyijimi, University of Georgia; Olanrewaju Paul Olaogun, University of Georgia; ISAAC DAMILARE DUNMOYE, Engineering Education and Transformation Institute, College of Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA; Nathaniel Hunsu, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

increasing student performance but also help the students tobecome self-directed learners which is essential for them to become lifelong learners.6References[1] G. Fellner-Röhling, K. Hromek, J. Kleinknecht, and S. Ludwig, "How to counteract biased self-assessments? An experimental investigation of reactions to social information," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 206, pp. 1-25, 2023/02/01/ 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.12.002.[2] R. Sharma, A. Jain, N. Gupta, S. Garg, M. Batta, and S. Dhir, "Impact of self-assessment by students on their learning," International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research, vol. 6, p. 226, 07/01 2016, doi: 10.4103/2229-516X.186961.[3] G

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - GIFTS

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Charles Bartolini, University of Notre Dame

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FYP)

," Environ.Behav., vol. 52, pp. 248-274, 2020.[6] S. Hanson and A. Jones, "Is there evidence that walking groups have health benefits? Asystematic review and meta-analysis," Br. J. Sports Med., vol. 49, pp. 710-715, 2015.[7] S. Revell and J. McLeod, "Experiences of therapists who integrate walk and talk into theirprofessional practice," Counseling and Psychotherapy Research, vol. 16, pp. 35-43, 2016.

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - GIFTS

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter DeCrescenzo, University of Maryland Baltimore County; Sunji Jangha

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FYP)

impossible, but thanks to allthe support and direction from the LSAMP program and MARC U* Star program, I feelconfident applying to graduate school! Watch out world, future Dr. . . . is coming for ya!” - FinalJournal EntryCritical self-reflection is a pedagogical tool that can benefit staff and undergraduate researchers.Through reflection, undergraduate researchers can compose and express their thoughts andfeelings about their experience while acknowledging potential areas of improvement and theirdedication to their overall academic and professional goals.References[1] F. A. Herrera, S. Hurtado, G. A. Garcia, and J. Gasiewski, “A model for redefining STEMidentity for talented STEM graduate students,” American Educational Research AssociationAnnual

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT) Technical Session 4: Curriculum and Programmatic Effects

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Md Tarique Hasan Khan, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Akshata Ashok Patil, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Bahar Memarian, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT)

% 4.36% 2 or More 3.09% 3.26% 3.05% (n=150) Native Amr 0% 0.09% 0.14% (n=4) Hawaiian(n=0) 0% 0% 0% Table 1. Demographic classification of the data of 4796 studentsStatistical method S Statistical software SPSS version 24 was used to analyze the data. First, generativedescriptive statistics are used to develop a preliminary understanding of the data. Second, A One-Way ANOVA analysis is conducted. To ascertain whether there are any statistically significantdifferences between the means of three or more independent (unrelated) groups, the one

Conference Session

Engineering Libraries Division (ELD) Technical Session 3: Instruction & Information Literacy

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Seth Vuletich, Colorado School of Mines; Brianna B. Buljung, Colorado School of Mines; Joseph R. Kraus, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries Division (ELD)

will help to enhanceprogram visibility.References[1] R. L. Layton et al., “Career planning courses increase career readiness of graduate and postdoctoral trainees,” F1000Res, vol. 9, p. 1230, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.12688/f1000research.26025.2.[2] J. M. Blaney, A. M. Wofford, S. Jeong, J. Kang, and D. F. Feldon, “Autonomy and Privilege in Doctoral Education: An Analysis of STEM Students’ Academic and Professional Trajectories,” The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 93, no. 7, pp. 1037–1063, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1080/00221546.2022.2082761.[3] H. Xu, R. S. T. Gilliam, S. D. Peddada, G. M. Buchold, and T. R. L. Collins, “Visualizing detailed postdoctoral employment trends using a new career outcome taxonomy,” Nat Biotechnol, vol. 36

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sanjeev Adhikari, Kennesaw State University; Sandeep Langar, The University of Texas at San Antonio; Rachel Mosier, Oklahoma State University

discussed.” While comments about the most importantconcepts included “acknowledging in what order tasks are to be done.” and “That the order inwhich things are done on a job site affects how the job gets done and how fast.”ConclusionA general contracting company was an integral part of the research that determined the learningexperiences among two student groups enrolled in the same semester for s BIM course. The firststudent group took the course online synchronous, whereas the second group took the same contentin the same semester in a face-to-face (F2F) environment. The study used an online surveymethodology in which the students in the two groups were asked various questions at the end ofthe semester to assess the perceptional differences in

Conference Session

Architectural Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shichao Liu, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Yichen Li, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Soroush Farzin

environments, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 355–385, 1997.[2] A. Alda, E. R. Bass, G. Chedd, C. Constantinou, C. O’Connell, and H. Schneider, “Raising the bar: employers’ views on college learning in the wake of the economic downturn,” Stony Brook University. School of Journalism., 2009, Accessed: Jan. 09, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A79927[3] S. Vassigh, “Hybrid Technologies for Interdisciplinary Education,” J Civil Environ Eng, vol. 05, no. 06, 2016, doi: 10.4172/2165-784X.1000201.[4] P. Milgram and F. Kishino, “A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays,” IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, vol. 77, no. 12, pp. 1321–1329, Dec. 1994.[5] M. Billinghurst, “Augmented reality in education,” New

Collection

ASEE Zone 1 Conference - Spring 2023

Authors

Michael Fosmire, Purdue University at West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

more sophisticated searchers.References[1] CJ Anderson, M Glassman, RB McAfee, and T Pinelli. (2001) An Investigation of factorsaffecting how engineers and scientists seek information. Journal of Engineering and TechnologyManagement. 18: 131-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(01)00032-7[2] C Tenopir and DW King. Chapter 5 Information Seeking and Use. Communication Patternsof Engineers. (2004) Wiley-IEEE Press. ISBN 0-471-48492-X s[3] P Pirolli and S Card. (1999) Information Foraging. Psychological Review. 106 (4): 643-675.https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.643

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Noemi Mendoza Diaz, Texas A&M University; Russell Meier, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Deborah Trytten, University of Oklahoma; Mark Weichold, Texas A&M University; Janie Moore, Texas A&M University

curriculum design so that theresulting curriculum supports the inclusion of any student lacking prior computing privilege. Thebroader impact is an informed academy preparing an inclusive community of diverse engineersto solve today‟s engineering problems through computational thinking and computer-assisteddesign.AcknowledgementsThis work is possible through the support of the NSF:RFE award #1917359 “CollaborativeResearch in Improving Computational Thinking in the Formation of Engineers, A Multi-Institutional Initiative.”Bibliography[1] “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2021 – 2022 | ABET.” https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2021-2022/ (accessed Jul. 09, 2021

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan Lord, University of San Diego; Matthew Ohland, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Richard Layton; Marisa Orr, Clemson University; Russell Long, Purdue Engineering Education; Joe Roy, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE); Hayaam Osman, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Catherine Brawner

, 2022[3] https://midfield.online/policy-summary/ Date Accessed January 20, 2022[4] R. Layton, R. Long, and M. Ohland, midfielddata: Sample of MIDFIELD Student Unit Record Data. R package version 0.1.3, 2018. https://github.com/MIDFIELDR/midfielddata[5] R. Layton, R. Long, and M. Ohland (2018). midfieldr: Tools for Studying MIDFIELD Student Unit Record Data in R. https://github.com/MIDFIELDR/midfieldr, https://engineering.purdue.edu/MIDFIELD.[6] S. M. Lord, M. W. Ohland, M. K. Orr, R. A. Layton, and R. A. Long, “Workshop: Engaging with MIDFIELD Data,” 2021 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Long Beach, CA, July 26, 2021.[7] S. M. Lord, M. W. Ohland, R. A. Long, M. K. Orr, and R. A. Layton

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katrina Donovan, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Jon Kellar, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Paula Jensen, Texas Tech University; Michael West, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Stuart Kellogg, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology

Paper ID #38319IMPLEMENTING CURRICULAR AND CO-CURRICULAR BEST PRACTICES TO INCREASE ANDRETAIN FEMALE ENGINEERSKatrina Donovan (Lecturer)Jon J Kellar (Professor)Paula H Jensen (Ph.D. Candidate) Paula Holmes Jensen is a Ph.D. Candidate at Texas Tech University and was the Co-PI of the NSF S-STEM grant Culture and Attitude at South Dakota School of Mines and Technology (SD Mines). She taught at SD Mines for ten years and is now pursuing her Ph.D. in Systems and Engineering Management at Texas Tech University full-time. Her research interests are in Engineering Education and Lean Six Sigma in the service industry. She also

Conference Session

Technology Integration in Manufacturing Curriculum

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ismail Fidan, Tennessee Technical University; Marshall Norris, Tennessee Technological University; Mithila Rajeshirke, Tennessee Technological University; Orkhan Huseynov, Tennessee Technological University; Suhas Alkunte, Tennessee Technological University; Mohammad Alshaikh Ali, Tennessee Technological University; Joji Jeevan Kumar Dasari, Tennessee Technological University; Zhicheng Zhang, Tennessee Technological University

by manufacturingeducators and students. The knowledge blocks covered by this paper were collected by a diversegroup of educators who hold positions in educational organizations. CM was provided as anexample in searching the capabilities of these systems but it is clear that the platforms reportedhere contain a high number of topics in current advanced manufacturing practices. In the future,the plan is to add more information from the practitioners of these systems with a qualitative andquantitative survey tool.References[1] “COVID-19 Pandemic.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic (accessed Feb. 03, 2022).[2] D. Masato and S. Johnston, “Project-Based Teaching of a Manufacturing Class During the COVID-19 Pandemic,” J

Collection

14th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference

Authors

Baker A. Martin, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Courtney June Faber, University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Betsy Chesnutt, University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Erin McCave, University of Tennessee at Knoxville

-course student feedback, of the few students who commentedon the use of PROCESS, some found it beneficial and enjoyed using it, while others felt that itwas a waste of time, especially on exams. We hope that these concerns from students can beminimized by spending some additional time at the beginning of the course explaining tostudents that documentation of work is critical in engineering, not only having the correctanswer.Figure 1. (Top) A blank exam question that requires students to follow the PROCESS format.(Bottom) The solution to the question including all the required steps in the PROCESS format.[1] S. J. Grigg and L. C. Benson, “A Coding Scheme for Analysing Problem-Solving Processes of First-Year Engineering Students,” European

Conference Session

Miscellaneous Mechanics

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Devin Berg, University of Wisconsin - Stout; Anne Schmitz, University of Wisconsin - Stout

– 818. doi: 10.1109/ICL.2015.7318133.[3] J. S. Thomas and T. A. Philpot, “An Inverted Teaching Model for a Mechanics of Materials Course,” Jun. 2012, p. 25.176.1-25.176.26. Accessed: Nov. 11, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/an-inverted-teaching-model-for-a-mechanics-of-materials-course[4] A. K. T. Howard, “Flipped Classroom – Ten Years Later,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Nov. 11, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/flipped-classroom-ten-years-later[5] A. K. T. Howard and M. T. Stimpson, “Online-Only Statics Compared to a Flipped Classroom,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2017. Accessed: Nov. 11, 2021

Conference Session

ERM: Student Professional Development: Professional Skills and Moving Beyond the Classroom

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tiantian Li, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Eric Holloway, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Kerrie Douglas, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Julie Martin, The Ohio State University; Victoria Bill, New York University Tandon School of Engineering

Engineeirng Acceditation Commission,” 2021.[2] T. N. A. Press, “The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century.,” 2004.[3] A. S. for E. Education, “Phase I: Synthesizing and integrating industry perspectives,” 2013.[4] G. Dall’Alba, “Learning professional ways of being: Ambiguities of becoming,” Educ. Philos. Theory, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 34–45, 2009.[5] G. Dall’Alba and J. Sandberg, “Learning through practice: A lifeworld perspective,” in Learning Through Practice, Dordrecht: Springer, 2010, pp. 104–119.[6] S. D. Garrett, J. P. Martin, and S. G. Adams, “Developing nontechnical professional skills in African American engineering majors through co-curricular activities,” IEEE Trans

Conference Session

ERM: Find Out More About Faculty!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward Latorre, University of Florida; Elizabeth Meier, University of Florida

, graduate student training and mentoring, and the evaluation tools for all participants. The resultsfrom the study will also help the academic community to initialize a practice of the One Teach, OneEngage co-teaching model, through demonstrations of the benefits for all participants and addressing thechallenges of implementing a similar program at their institutions.References 1. ABET. “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2021 – 2022.” abet.org. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering- programs-2021-2022/ (accessed Jan. 7, 2022). 2. S. Van Ginkel, J. Gulikers, H. Biemans, and M. Mulder, “Towards a set of design principles for developing oral presentation

Conference Session

ERM: Self-Efficacy, Motivation, and MORE!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Campbell Bego, University of Louisville; Jeffrey Hieb, University of Louisville; Patricia Ralston, University of Louisville; Thomas Tretter; Jason Immekus; Jody Zhong, University of Louisville

patterns of results over time.References[1] G. Zhang, T. J. Anderson, M. W. Ohland, and B. R. Thorndyke, “Identifying factors influencing engineering student graduation: A longitudinal and cross-institutional study,” J. Eng. Educ., 2004, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00820.x.[2] M. W. Ohland, S. D. Sheppard, G. Lichtenstein, O. Eris, D. Chachra, and R. A. Layton, “Persistence, engagement, and migration in engineering programs,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 259–278, 2008.[3] W. Pearson Jr and J. D. Miller, “Pathways to an engineering career,” Peabody J. Educ., vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 46–61, 2012, doi: 10.1080/0161956X.2012.642270.[4] M. Crawford and M. MacLeod, “Gender in the college classroom: An

Conference Session

ERM: Systematic Reviews!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexander Struck Jannini; Zeynep Akdemir, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Muhsin Menekse, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

were included in the literature review.*Alrakaf, S., Anderson, C., Coulman, S. A., John, D. N., Tordoff, J., Sainsbury, E., Rose, G., & Smith, L. (2015). An international comparison study of pharmacy students' achievement goals and their relationship to assessment type and scores. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe79335Bardach, L., Oczlon, S., Pietschnig, J., & Lüftenegger, M. (2020). Has achievement goal theory been right? A meta-analysis of the relation between goal structures and personal achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(6), 1197–1220. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000419Brown, P. R., McCord, R. E., Matusovich, H. M., & Kajfez, R. L

Conference Session

Student Division Technical 2: Instruction & Learning Delivery

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Haleh Brotherton, Clemson University; Marisa Orr, Clemson University; Jessica Manning, Clemson University

replace academic advisors. Instead, we hope to use thisdashboard to give students more power over their academic career and give them tools to get themost out of advising sessions and instructor meetings.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) underGrant No. 1745347. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.References:[1] F. S. Kia, S. D. Teasley, M. Hatala, S. A. Karabenick, and M. Kay, “How patterns of students dashboard use are related to their achievement and self-regulatory engagement,” PervasiveHealth Pervasive Comput. Technol. Healthc., pp. 340–349, 2020

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Geoffrey Knowles, Bryan College; Jung Han, Purdue University; Todd Kelley, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

educational psychology, vol. 77, pp. 15-46, 1996.[5] J. S. Brown, A. Collins, and P. Duguid, “Situated cognition and the culture of learning,” Educational Researcher, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 32-42, 1989.[6] J. Lave and E. Wenger, Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1991.[7] R. T. Putnam and H. Borko, ‘What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning?,” Educational researcher, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 4-15, 2000.[8] S. Semken, “Sense of place and place-based introductory geoscience teaching for American Indian and Alaska Native undergraduates,” Journal of Geoscience Education, vol. 53, pp. 149-157, 2005.[9] L. M