selection of portfolio content; the criteria forselection; the criteria for judging merit; and evidence of student self-reflection” [1].Archbald and Newmann [2] and Paulson, Paulson, and Meyer [1] were among the firstproponents of the idea that students should be active developers and assessors of their ownportfolios, and there is general agreement in the assessment community that students musttake the lead in documenting their learning. Towards that end, most portfolio assessmentsystems provide students at minimum with a general outline or “menu” of contents(suggested and/or required entries) and the evaluative criteria that will be applied.The AP ® Studio Art portfolio assessment has served as a critical model in conceptualizinga considerably
)IntroductionThe diversity of the U.S. population is changing with predictions indicating that by 2050 therewill be no “majority race.” Already, Latino and Black communities make up 30% of thecountry’s population [1]. However, this current level of diversity is not reflected in the STEMfields. In engineering, there has only been a small increase in Hispanic graduates from 8.5% in2011 to 11.9% in 2019 and almost no increase in Black graduates (4.2% to 4.3%). Over 50% ofthe engineering graduates nationwide continue to be White [2]. Increasing diversity in STEM isrequired to solve important problems faced by society through a wider array of solutions [3].Unfortunately, Black, Latino, and Indigenous youth often close the door to STEM careers earlyin their
departments have always praised him for his outstanding teaching and research excellence. He has been involved in numerous professional societies to supplement his teaching and research, including ASCE, ACI, ASEE, ASC, ATMAE, and TRB. His research output has been well disseminated as he has published thirty journal papers and thirty-nine conference papers. His research interests are 1) Creating Innovative Sustainable Materials, 2) Digital Construction, 3) BIM and VDC, 4) Virtual Testing Lab, 5) Construction Education, and 6) Sustainability.Sandeep Langar (Dr.)Rachel Mosier (Associate Professor) Rachel Mosier is an Associate Professor at Oklahoma State University and a licensed as a professional engineer in Construction
. His fields of research interest are Image processing, Bioinstrumentation, Ultrasonics, Biomechanics, Finite-element modeling, and development of computer algorithms. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Remote Laboratory Delivery with an At-Home Biomechanical Kinematic Data Acquisition Method (WIP) Ahmed M. Sayed 1,2 1 Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, MSOE University, Milwaukee, WI, USA 2 Biomedical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University, Helwan, EgyptAbstract Under the remote learning
coolOnce this information is obtained, the motivating factors can be used to improve theeffectiveness and increase interest from the student perspective in an attempt to reduce dropoutrates from engineering students.Context in LiteratureAcross Activities in Curriculum, Co-curricular, and WorkStudying engineering as an undergraduate student allows for the exploration and investigation ofpossible interests. A program of study in a particular major may map out a balance of breadthand depth in that engineering field. There are co-curricular and extra-curricular opportunities thatadd to that [1, 2].And certainly, internships bring additional context for what students may consider as the practiceand activities of engineering. With all that, students
describing curiositythat stimulates noticing and the former that motivates knowledge generation. While intimatelyconnected in engineering, this study sought to understand the nature of teachers’ perceptualcuriosity only. In what ways did they notice, find interest, and express curiosity aboutengineering knowledge, processes, and cultural connections. Understanding the nature of thisstudy’s group of participants’ perceptual curiosity, as a group of non-engineers but futureengineering educators, has implications for finding teacher education supports that better engagethem. 1 Curiosity can serve as a motivator to teaching and learning. In Cunningham
design courses. Thecourses associated with the competition have skill-building exercises that are needed to beeffective participants. The final competition participation does not carry any course credit, andthe cash prizes are the motivators for the high-achieving teams. This paper describes an analysisof student performance data that tracks the correlation between course performance tocompetition success.Introduction and BackgroundA literature review related to competition-based learning (CBL) shows that it is a derivative ofproject-based learning and has numerous benefits in engineering education [1-4]. Competitionsprimarily motivate students to learn independently and supplement the traditional classroom [1].Working in a team towards a common
several decades [1]-[5]. First-year student retention in science,technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) programs is particularly important asstudents primarily leave STEM programs between their first and second years [2]-[8]. Seymourand Hewitt’s [8] comprehensive review of attrition in STEM programs reports that roughly 35%of students leave STEM majors during the transition between the first and second year; most ofthese students switched majors, but some dropped out of college entirely. They also describehow attrition rates in STEM programs decrease dramatically after this initial loss, suggesting thatstudent retention in STEM programs may increase if efforts are made to better retain first-yearstudents [8].A more recent report
today than it ever has been that theengineers of tomorrow must not only be exposed to — but rather steeped in — the principles ofdiversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). In recent years, incorporation of DEI principles hasbecome a marquee focus in engineering curricula across the country. However, these efforts havealso drawn considerable skepticism from pedagogical traditionalists, who perceive anintrinsically zero-sum relationship between DEI and technical rigor, the latter of which isthe sine qua non of engineering education.In this work, we address these (understandable and justifiable) concerns by highlighting twoopportunities to engineer a virtuous cycle that simultaneously elevates technical rigor and DEIoutcomes: (1) identifying
need to explore theunderstandings of engineering held by middle and high school Technology and Engineeringteachers. This study incorporated two phases: 1) the alignment of the Standards forTechnological and Engineering Literacy (STEL) Benchmarks (ITEEA, 2020) for grades 9-12with the Nature of Engineering Knowledge (NOEK) framework, and 2) data analysis of 69Technology and Engineering teachers Views about the Nature of Engineering Knowledge(VNOEK) questionnaires (Antink-Meyer & Brown, 2020). The VNOEK explores 7 features and17 sub-features the describe the epistemology of engineering knowledge, which reflectbenchmarks in seven of the eight STEL Standards.This study found that the 7 features of the NOEK were found in the STEL standards at
tostudents’ professional goals, civic and community engagement, and needs identification. The initialresults of the thematic analysis are presented in this paper. Based on the results, we will discusschallenges related to the implementation of the program and suggest modifications intended for Fall 2022.IntroductionClinical immersion is a necessary component of the biodesign process and therefore serves a critical rolein the development and education of biomedical engineers. [1, 2, 3] Typically, biomedical engineeringprograms offer courses with a clinical immersion component as advanced elective courses [4], meaningthat students receive clinical immersion experiences later in their programs or not at all. In contrast,biomedical engineering students
confidence, confidence following topic coverage, and metacognitive reflection,as well as with mock FE exam scores. An exploratory k-means cluster analysis further identifiedstudents belonging to four clusters. A potential implication of this study for engineeringeducation is to highlight the importance of students’ confidence in problem-solving skills forsubsequent performance. Importantly, this study presents students’ perceptions and appraisals ofthe course activities that impact their problem-solving confidence.IntroductionEngineers are problem solvers and thus fostering problem-solving skills during their academicendeavors is extremely important [1]. Problem-solving is defined as a process used to obtain abest answer to a context or situation [1
, construction has been booming throughout the USA. The construction industry is one of the nation'slargest industries and one of the largest sources of employment. Employment in construction is projected to grow 6percent from 2020 to 2030 [1]. At the same time, since projects are becoming more complex, attaining a bachelor'sdegree is an increasingly important requirement for obtaining access to high-demand, well-paying careers in theconstruction management industry [2]. The demand for construction education graduates has increased markedly inthe past several years. As a result of this demand, construction education programs flourish throughout the nation [3,4]. The search result of ASC Archives for all past articles on construction programs shows that
' understanding of career opportunities inBME, we developed a series of 1-credit (4-week) BME-In-Practice Modules that exposedbiomedical learners to biomedical engineering practice. Each 1-credit module in the series wasdesigned to run for four weeks and focused on different areas in BME such as Tissueengineering, Computational Modeling, Medical Device Development, Drug Development,Regulations, and Neural Engineering. Learners' enrolled in one or multiple modules and engagedin experiential learning for 4-weeks to gain knowledge and skills relevant to the BME area offocus in the module(s). Following the conclusion of the BME-In-Practice series, we collectedsurvey data from learners who participated in the modules to address the following researchquestions
Electrical Systems, was chosen and includedthese broad topics as well as plumbing. The faculty know it as the MEP course, and studentsnickname it the Mechanical course since that is the first area in the course they study. Forconstruction engineering students, this course broadens their curriculum and allows them tointeract with faculty and students in other departments. Mechanical engineering students can takethis course as an elective to apply many theoretical concepts from previous courses into anarrower field. Since its inception, the course has been taught by a mechanical engineeringfaculty member.The ASME Vision 2030 [1] states that the problems that mechanical engineers work on ofteninclude elements of other engineering disciplines, require
-introduce socio-technical context in CEE curricula, weare conducting a systematic review of the published literature. The objectives of this research areto document, synthesize, and amplify the work of these scholars and to encourage the communityof CEE faculty to re-contextualize the knowledge and skills taught in the CEE curriculum. Thispaper describes the methodology, including search terms and sources examined, reports thepreliminary results of the review, and synthesizes the preliminary findings. Future work willpropose strategies and structures that could be adapted and employed by civil engineering facultythroughout the U.S. to 1) engage and retain students from groups that historically have beenexcluded from CEE and 2) better educate CEE
transitioninto college Dr. Maria Elena Chavez-Echeagaray, Dr. Tamara Coronella, and Robert Dodge Arizona State UniversityAbstractThis Work in Progress paper describes the effect of Homework 0 (HW 0), an activity offered atWestern University designed to support Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics(STEM) students’ successful transition to the first year of college. This transition is a criticaltime as students face several personal and academic challenges [1] or most, college means a newlifestyle and level of independence [1]. Pre-college academic activities are positively correlatedwith a student’s persistence and graduation [2] because these activities can support thedevelopment of a student’s sense
is important to briefly consider several types of definitions and select which type ofdefinition that we will employ in this paper.In Chapter 3 of his book on formal logic, Clark [1] described three commonly used types ofdefinitions: connotative definitions, denotative definitions, and ostensive definitions. To helpillustrate the differences between these types of definitions let us borrow Clark’s example andconsider the varying ways to define the term eligible voter. A connotative definition defines theterm by listing the necessary and sufficient qualifications that attach to those to whom the termvalidly applies (e.g., a human being, over the age of 18, and who is a citizen of the geographicalor political region in which the election
be employed to measure and address inequities withina population. Comprehensive demographic data collection allows for the representation of diverse livedexperiences among the surveyed population. However, in many cases the survey instruments developedto collect demographic data lack the nuance required to fully capture the diversity of lived experience amongall members of the population under study. In particular, the LGBTQ+ community is one that remainscritically understudied. Recent studies have begun to examine the unique difficulties that LGBTQ+ peopleface in STEM careers and education, which include navigating coming out in the workplace [1], harassment,and professional devaluation [2]. These difficulties have detrimental effects on
applyingsustainability to their design work. As a general trend based on the alumni data, women alsotended to feel less confident in applying sustainability to their design work. However, they weremore interested in the concept than men. This paper will suggest improvements in ALMs relatedto sustainability concepts at Boise State University.IntroductionIn recent years, sustainability concepts have piqued an interest in many professionalcommunities and have been emphasized in workforce development and student education [1],[2]. With interest in sustainability rising, many universities have begun integrating sustainabilityconcepts into their engineering curriculum [3]–[5]. Many universities, including Boise StateUniversity (BSU), introduced sustainable concepts
the demographics and the situation are different, the human touch cannot entirely bereplaced by virtual advising. Some authors have written about how students faced wideningbarriers in higher education due to lack of informed guidance as a result of inability to adapt tovirtual formats, particularly those who were not proactive about their next educational steps7.The International Association of Student Affairs and Services (IASAS) mentions acomprehensive set of out of- the-classroom student services that are designed to “enable andempower students to focus more intensely on their studies and personal growth, both cognitivelyand emotionally8. It mentions three key objectives that higher education institutions should aimfor (1) identify the
demonstrates awareness of downstream effects [1].Approaches such as sustainable design [2], human-centered design [3], value-sensitive design[4], and universal design [5] have gained popularity in pushing engineering design toward amore holistic thought process. These methodologies ask engineers to expand their design scopeand consider the impact of their engineering solutions on a global scale, with new stakeholdersfrom a wide range of backgrounds, countries, cultures, and experiences. Engineering designersmust now constantly consider effects on the environment and natural resources, both for the sakeof the present and for future generations. Engineers must design not just for individual wants andneeds, but also for the public good. These
. She received her B. S. in Bioengineering from the University of Pittsburgh.Kate FinleyVictoria Longfield © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com A Module on Ethics and Social Implications of Computing for Introductory Engineering Computing CoursesIntroduction Documentaries like The Social Dilemma [1] and Coded Bias [2] present ethical and socialimplications of computing to the public, increasing awareness of these critical concerns. Thelatter features several researchers who have been investigating algorithmic bias and howdifferent groups of people (with respect to race, class, and gender) are harmed more by
campusactivities; as to teaching and learning, two-thirds of the institutions claim to have replacedclassroom learning with distance learning, facing major challenges such as technicalinfrastructure, competences and pedagogies for distance learning and study requirements, whilegaining some benefits of more opportunities for flexible learning possibilities 1 . Other challengesregarding affordability, life-long learning, education policy, and students with special needs arewell summarized in a 2021 literature review 2 . Till 2022, an abundance of researches have focusedon the general impact of campus closure and classes moving online 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 . Studiesfocusing on specific areas or needs of education, however, are gaining popularity recently as
simulation resultswith respect to an accepted failure theory for the selected material. This facilitates thedevelopment of students’ critical thinking skills by making connections between theory andsimulation, and illustrates some of the fundamental mechanics principles and concepts.1. IntroductionAdvanced computational tools provide a powerful resource to address the need for learningthrough real-world concepts. Computational simulations offer an interactive learning tool forstudents to explore various concepts, test ideas, and receive feedback [1]. The use of computersimulations as a learning aid in higher education is growing rapidly and has become a majortrend in undergraduate engineering education [2]. On the subject of machine design
proficiencyby employers using a Likert scale of 0 as not important or not proficient to 4 as absolutelyessential or absolutely proficient (Hirudayaraj, 2021). According to their findings, the topprofessional competencies ranked most important for entry-level engineers were: 1) reliability,with an importance rating of 3.93 and proficiency rating of 3.35; 2) ability to work in teams(ABET required competency), with an importance rating of 3.86 and proficiency rating of 3.38;3) responsibility, with an importance rating of 3.86 and proficiency rating of 3.32; 4) self-motivation, with an importance of 3.85 and a proficiency rating of 3.30; and 5) positive attitude,with an importance rating of 3.82 and proficiency rating of 3.55 (Hirudayaraj, 2021). Sincemany
are known problem-solvers. Through their rigorous education and subsequent practice,they learn to solve complex open-ended problems for the betterment of society. What is lesswell-known is that professional engineers are also great visualizers. In tests with more than30,000 professionals [1], engineers demonstrated the highest level of spatial visualization skills,followed closely by architects and other STEM professionals. A more recent study shows astrong correlation between spatial visualization skills and creativity and technical innovation [2].This leads to the hypothesis that undergraduate engineering degree programs should producegraduates with well-developed spatial skills if we are to produce engineers who are capable ofsolving the
from pilot tests with students.IntroductionIn many engineering classes, active experimentation is an important step in the learning process[1], [2]. Through this activity the learner is able to translate an abstract concept into practicalapplication. Translation of abstract principles to real world concepts is often achieved throughinstructional laboratories that typically require significant space, time, and faculty resources. Toaddress the heavy burden of labs on these resources, remote or fully virtual labs have becomemore popular in different areas of STEM in the last decade, especially with the increase in thenumber of online classes offered [3], [4], [5]. Remote labs are physically existing labs, which canbe used online without being
appropriatesource of evidence for decision-making due to the lack of rigour in their methodology (Green et al.,2006). Since the purpose of this paper is to foster a philosophical discussion around the translation ofactor-network theory in engineering education research, we chose narrative literature review as ourmethodology.We searched for ANT literature in the Journal of Engineering Education, European Journal of EngineeringEducation, Engineering Studies and the conference proceedings of the Canadian Association ofEngineering Education and American Society for Engineering Education. First, we selected all papers thatcontained any mention to actor-network theory and engineering in the full text. Next, we appliedselection criteria to exclude papers that 1