engineering students, undergraduate non-engineering students, graduate students,to engineering faculty. The durations included 2 hours, 1 day, 1 semester, 2 years, and astudent’s entire undergraduate career. Of the 13 cases analyzed, 9 had a general orientation, notrelating explicitly to a given engineering discipline. 3/13 cases were designed towards civil andenvironmental engineering students, and 1/13 was aimed towards civil, environmental, andmechanical engineering students. The professorate leading the course was more variable.Engineering instructors had backgrounds or were teaching in biomedical, civil, environmental,mechanical, electrical and/or computer engineering. Liberal instructors included professoratefrom English, education, and
lasting impact on student careers.5,9, 10 New research centers or interdisciplinary initiatives tend to iteratively encourage newinterdisciplinary research collaborations which are often tied to education.8 Also, student-led andstudent-centered research and education initiatives seem to prepare students well for theircareers.11 Together, these factors seem to help enhance the utility and strength of emerginginterdisciplinary research collaborations but remain fairly specialized and fragmented. If these factors were combined, interdisciplinary research collaborations resulting fromstudent projects could become stronger. Specifically, it can be hypothesized that the featureslisted below could contribute to a successful and personalized
. Page 23.240.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Bazinga! You’re an engineer…you’re___! A Qualitative Study on the Media and Perceptions of Engineers While a significant amount of television air time is dedicated to dramatizing careers,engineering careers seem somewhat vacant from the prime time line up. Many studies have beenconducted to look at the impact of popular television shows on how people view careerprofessionals but little has been done to look at the impact of popular media on people’s views ofengineers. This pilot study looked at the impact of viewing popular media articles that focus onengineering characters on a person’s perception of an engineer. The
(Why did you join your team?) that are aligned with the protocol questions informed bythe factor categories. Subsequent micro-coding teased apart the broader themes and providedresearchers with discrete data (friends/ peers, team success, type of technology, enhance career,etc.) for analysis.Data for this paper consist primarily of the responses by our student participants. In someinstances, we have included the actual question posed by the interviewer. That text is precededby the letter “I”. Student responses are generally preceded by a member designation assigned tothat participant. Due to the number of participants and because this analysis does not pivotaround questions of sex or race and ethnicity, we do not include student
or a strong connection to technology use to help students connect technical and policy subjects.Since the range of breadth and depth of the energy history is so vast, the case study proposedcovers the years between 1880 and 1935, highlights a series of legislative pursuits and impactson the private energy sector, the evolution of the energy product, and the development of theenergy industry. This case study will expose students to a portion of energy policy history in theUnited States and therefore help them understand the development of the current energy policyenvironment.Sample Case Study This section outlines the case study selected for this module. This case study follows aportion of the career of Samuel Insull and the
teamwork in engineering, design education, and engineering identity. She was awarded a CAREER grant from NSF to study expert teaching practices in capstone design courses nationwide, and is co-PI on NSF. Her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, the effects of curriculum on design cognition, the effects of differing design pedagogies on retention and motivation, the dynamics of cross-disciplinary collaboration in both academic and industry design environments, and gender and identity in engineering.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Dr. Lisa DuPree McNair is an associate professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech where she also serves as assistant department head of Graduate
same thing,in the same way, at the same pace, at the same sequence, at the same time42. This focus on massproduced uniform learning hinders learning when students are forced to learn in a way, at a pace,at a sequence, or in a time they are uncomfortable with. Mass produced uniform learning alsoproduces a lot of inefficiencies since students often learn topics they are not interested inlearning, or that they do not need based on their career goals, or that they already know but areforced to relearn anyway with the rest of the class.The student’s learning goals can range from learning an entire standard curriculum, to learning asingle course, or even a single or multiple nodes from a single or several courses. In case thestudent chooses
Page 23.1234.4to be learning.Some of the benefits of introducing engineering (in particular engineering design) into themathematics and science curricula are increased interest in STEM subjects and careers in STEMfields. Several studies found an increase in students’ interest in these areas after implementingengineering design into K-12 science and mathematics classes13, 14, 21, 22. There was also anincrease found in students’ interest and attitudes in STEM subjects in studies that involvedcurriculum used as extra curricular programs such as Adventure Engineering19, Engineering isElementary23, and In the Middle of Engineering24.While there is limited data in this area, it has been suggested that the inclusion of engineering inK-12 can lead to
manager, technical staff, and six mid-career facultymembers with industry experience, who will work alongside six current faculty members to staffthe three labs. In order to infuse NYIT’s academic programs with practical applications, faculty willhave the opportunity to have summer residencies in industry and conversely, industry practitionerswill have the opportunity to spend time in shared-use collaborative work spaces at the Center. Onepartnership with IBM is leading to the integration of Enterprise Systems computing in thecurriculum and the participation of faculty in several workshops and conferences on EnterpriseSystems. Another alliance with Juniper Networks will result in innovations in NYIT’s MS inNetwork Security curriculum.Every year
and requirements of especially the Masters-Level programsshould be examined, along with the needs and expectations of structural engineering practice,with input from both academics and the profession. The reported study was designed to obtainsignificant critical information on the expected preparation of the young engineer in structuralengineering practice using a survey based modified Delphi method. This paper discusses a methodology for determining the expectations of the structuralengineering profession for the preparation of the young engineer achieved through graduate workand early-career experience, along with the results of this study. For structural engineering thequestion of expected competencies may be examined for at least
review, 51 journal articles, and 100 confer- ence papers. He has mentored four doctoral students, eleven masters students, 25 undergraduate research students, and 11 undergraduate senior design project teams; over 300 K-12 teachers and 95 high school student researchers; and eighteen undergraduate GK-12 Fellows and 53 graduate GK-12 Fellows. More- over, he directs K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach programs that currently enrich the STEM education of over 2,000 students annually.Dr. Magued G. Iskander P.E., Polytechnic Institute of New York University Dr. Magued Iskander is a professor of Civil and Urban Engineering at NYU-Poly. Dr. Iskander is a recip- ient of NSF CAREER award, Chi Epsilon (Civil
academic background in biology and the environment, as well as computer science andengineering experience. The project included both graduate and undergraduate students so thatall could benefit at an early stage in their careers. The photo (Fig. 2) shows participants at anearly stage of the project gathered at the inventor’s residence for early experimentation. Figure 2. Early project participants Academic vs. Business Environment Michael Levine brings his entrepreneurial background to the project. As such, he isaccustomed to being surrounded by people devoting their full attention to his projects. In anacademic environment such single-mindedness is unrealistic to expect. Student participants
. Page 23.643.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Global Confidence: U.S. Student Outcomes from an International Capstone Design ExperienceAbstractThe Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE)-Sustainable Energyand Aeronautical Engineering Program (SEAEP) brings together a consortium of fouruniversities: Florida State University (FSU), the University of Pittsburgh (Pitt),Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) and Federal University of Paraná (UFPR) totrain post-secondary engineering students for global engineering careers. A key aspect ofthis program is using design courses as a vehicle for student and faculty collaboration—both U.S. and Brazilian
technologists various advancedskills that can be used in their careers. Overall, many different fields of engineering can benefitfrom this application, enabling the development of skill and knowledge in many differentengineering aspects and processes. As this capstone design project provides opportunities forstudents to design & manufacture, it stimulates the students’ interest in real-world productrealization. As manufacturing laboratories are very expensive to develop, this project can also beadapted at other institutions that have limited funding to improve manufacturing processfacilities.Background In Drexel University’s School of Technology and Professional Studies, many courses relatedto robotics, design, and materials are offered to the
introducethe engineering process as the foundation for all future coursework and career practices. Thispaper discusses an implementation of a freshman engineering design course that embodies thisbelief.The Introduction to Aerospace Engineering course, AERO 101, develops the fundamentalcontext and importance of the aerospace engineering major and profession. While it is not arequired course in the curriculum, it can be completed either in the first or second semester of thestudents’ college career and has substantial influence over the students’ opinions and enthusiasmabout aerospace engineering. Students enter the course with little or no engineering experiencebut anticipate using the information in the course to assist in making a decision on choice
, citizenship through leadership, including a solid theoretical and management, decision-making and practical foundation problem solving abilities Sustainable Success: Graduates who have sustainable career success and participate in leadership roles through lifelong learning, effective communication, multidisciplinary teams, and broad-based perspective of engineering and societal needs 22 DEPARTMENT PROGRAM OUTCOMES: Aligned with curriculum and extracurricular activities (10 program outcomes connected to leadership
joining the LSU faculty in 1988. As associate dean, he has acquired funding from NSF to support the development of several initiatives aimed at improving student retention and graduation rates as well as supporting faculty with development with effective learning and teaching pedagogies.Prof. Sarah Liggett, Louisiana State UniversityMr. Warren R Hull Sr. P.E., Louisiana State University Warren R. Hull, Sr. is the Engineering Communication Studio Manager at Louisiana State University. He earned a B.S. from Louisiana State University and an M.S. from Harvard University. He is a licensed professional engineer whose engineering career spans over 40 years. Prior to joining LSU, Hull was a senior partner with an
. This is notsurprising given the potential rewards of a successful entrepreneurial career both with respect toallowing entrepreneurs the freedom to pursue their own ideas and visions as well as with respect tothe potential for large material rewards. But how do we nurture students to become successful en-trepreneurs? In this paper, we report on an innovative program at the authors’ institution, designedto nurture students to become IT entrepreneurs. While the program builds on the experiences ofother programs, it includes a number of novel components that are integrated together in an un-usual manner to interlock and complement each other.1. IntroductionIt is widely accepted that entrepreneurship is the engine that drives the American economy
engineering curriculum, a foundationwill be formed upon which a system for improved communication skill in engineering can bebuilt.Initial InvestigationsThere has been for a long time a concerted effort by a number of practitioners across the countryto develop programs that will help students understand the need to communicate in a manner thatwill benefit careers outside of the English world. The Writing Across the Curriculum movementhas done much to support the need to make faculty and students more conscious of theimportance of communication in life and in the workplace. The Northwest Inland Writing Projectat the University of Idaho, the National Writing Project, and the Red Mountain Writing ProjectScholarly Writing Retreat for University Faculty
Paper ID #5953Applying Decoding the Disciplines in a Construction Engineering MechanicsCourse: A description of the Decoding InterviewDr. John Tingerthal, Northern Arizona University John joined the Construction Management faculty at Northern Arizona University as an assistant professor in 2007. His engineering career spans a wide variety of design and forensic engineering experiences. He spent the first eight years of his career performing structural consulting engineering in Chicago. This work culminated with design work on the Minneapolis Public Library and the Overture Center for the Arts in Madison Wisconsin. He was
Minority Science and Engineering Improvement Program (MSEIP) grant by the USDepartment of Education. The project, entitled Student On-ramp Leading to Engineering andSciences (SOLES), aims to increase the participation, retention, and success of underrepresentedand educationally disadvantaged students interested in pursuing careers in STEM fields. Amongthe strategies developed for this project is the Summer Math Jam – a two-week intensivemathematics program designed to improve students’ preparation for college-level math courses.This paper summarizes the results of the implementation of the Math Jam and its one-weekversion, the Mini-Math Jam, over the last four years.2. Incoming Student Interest and Level of Preparation for EngineeringCañada
describes an on-going research project in establishing the validity of a direct methodfor teaching and measuring undergraduate engineering students’ professional skills. Proficiencyin engineering professional skills (Table 1) is critical for success in the multidisciplinary,intercultural team interactions that characterize global 21st century engineering careers. Yet,faculty members around the world have struggled to define, teach and measure professionalskills since their introduction as ABET criteria for engineering programs in 20001,2,3,4 . In fall2006, the Washington State University (WSU) College of Engineering in the northwesternUnited States (US) developed an innovative, direct method to teach and measure the ABETprofessional skills
sections of the current website. From the surveys it was apparent that studentsneeded an easier way to navigate and the solution was to design an effective site map. Anothersection that needed to be added was to have more examples of engineering careers to aid studentswith future job prospects. The other key takeaways from the survey were to clearly define themission statement, improve website functionality, and add a calendar of events section to thewebsite. This team worked on a step by step mockup for the programmers to follow whenimplementing the website requirements. Two of the mockups are shown in Figures 3 and 4below.Figure 3: Mockup of Future “Site Map” Tab
Paper ID #7494Project-Based Learning: Teaching Engineering Design Not TinkeringDr. Scott F. Kiefer, York College of Pennsylvania Scott Kiefer has spent the past eleven years teaching mechanical engineering at four different institu- tions. As an exemplary teaching specialist in mechanical engineering at Michigan State University, Scott received the Withrow Award for Teaching Excellence, given to one faculty member in the College in En- gineering for outstanding instructional performance. Scott specializes in machine design, vibrations and controls, and mechatronics. He started his career at the University of Puerto
know how to replenishtheir knowledge by self-motivated, self-initiated learning. They will have to be aware ofsocioeconomic changes and appreciate the impact of these changes on the social and economiclandscape in the United States and elsewhere. The engineer of 2020 and beyond will need skillsto be globally competitive over the length of her or his career” (pp. 152-153).3But while this need may be well-recognized,4-5 the motivations for producing globally competentengineers vary across a number of stakeholders. For example, the Newport Declaration includesa very diverse set of rationales for global engineering education.6-7 The declaration characterizeshow globalization dynamics and discourses affect traditional views of engineering, with
engineering is and how it contributes to economic development, quality of life, national security, and health—information that could be conveyed through effective messaging. (p. 19-20)Fifth, it limits the size of the engineering labor market: Women, African Americans, Hispanics, Native Americans, and some Asian American groups are significantly underrepresented in engineering, based on their proportions in the population at large…In the future…the engineering profession will have to draw more heavily on underrepresented groups for the country to maintain, let alone increase, its technological capability. Thus messages that effectively encourage girls and underrepresented minorities to consider careers
diverse academic preparation backgrounds can be found elsewhere2.In 2006, the WMU Residence Life (RL) office created a living learning community, EngineeringHouse (EH), for engineering and applied sciences students choosing to live on campus; CEASstudents are not required to select the learning community. Since 2006, the two units haveincreasingly worked together to support student success, and collaboration has been extended toother units of Student Affairs (SA), e.g., Career and Student Employment Services. Thepartnership between CEAS and SA was strengthened in 2009 with joint planning and submissionof a proposal to the National Science Foundation’s STEM Talent Expansion Program (STEP). In2010 CEAS and RL developed and co-supervise a Student
-related (furthermore,most STEM offerings focus on computer science rather than engineering). Compounding thelack of offerings in STEM summer camps is the fact that most engineering students, after theybegin the core of their programs in their sophomore year, complete internships over the summerin preparation for their careers. Student government also has low participation among Page 23.1085.13engineering, computer science, and math students which, while common among several of thefive institutions in this study, does not have an immediate explanation.Teaching University: At the teaching university, students are most active in shared living
a project manager and senior con- sultant. He has taught and developed undergraduate and graduate courses in electronics, power systems, control and power electronics, electric machines, instrumentation, radar and remote sensing, numerical methods and data analysis, space and atmosphere physics, and physics. His research interests included power system stability, control and protection, renewable energy system analysis, assessment and design, power electronics and electric machines for wind energy conversion, radar and remote sensing, wave and turbulence simulation, measurement and modeling, numerical modeling, electromagnetic compatibility and engineering education. During his career Dr. Belu published several
Hallowell, University of Colorado Dr. Matthew Hallowell is an Assistant Professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder. He earned a PhD with a dual focus in Construction Engineering and Management and Occupational Safety and Health from Oregon State University. He also earned a BS and MS in Civil Engineering from Bucknell University. For his efforts in teaching innovations, Dr. Hallowell has received the National Science Foun- dation CAREER award, Beavers Endowed Faculty Fellowship, John and Mercedes Peebles Innovation in Education Award, the ASCE New Faculty Excellence in Teaching Award, the Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering’s Teaching Award, University of Colorado College of En