, A. (2018). Learning in virtual reality: Effects on performance, emotion and engagement. Research in Learning Technology, 26.[8] Fegely, A. G., Hagan, H. N., & Warriner III, G. H. (2020). A practitioner framework for blended learning classroom inquiry-based virtual reality lessons. E-Learning and Digital Media, 17(6), 521- 540.[9] Wang, Y., & Braman, J. (2009). Extending the classroom through Second Life. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 235.[10] Pinho, M. S., Bowman, D. A., & Freitas, C. M. D. S. (2008). Cooperative object manipulation in collaborative virtual environments. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society, 14(2), 53-67.[11] Kwon, C. (2019). Verification of the possibility and
education.The Conceptual Framework for the Engineer of 2020 StudiesFor the past several years, our research team has been refining a conceptual framework(Terenzini & Reason, 200532, 201033) that offers a systems view of college-level learning that 1)addresses the role of students’ prior learning and social experiences, and 2) acknowledges therole of organizational conditions (e.g., policies that influence faculty decisions about teaching),program-level culture, and program policies and practices related to teaching and learning. Thiscombination of factors, depicted in Figure 1, affects the nature and quality of student learning.Figure 1.Conceptual frameworkThe elements of the conceptual framework (identified in the boxes and ovals in Figure 1
enhance analytical abilities and promote problem-solving skills usingmultiple levels of abstraction [15]. Institutes define the CT according to unique goals and standards, meaning no unifiedCT definitions exist among researchers. For example, the International Society for Technologyin Education (ISTE) defines CT as a systematic approach for solving problems in computersciences and other subject areas and careers [16]. According to the K–12 Computer ScienceFramework, CT is closely related to computer sciences, specifically the capabilities ofcomputers for solving various problems using algorithms. The framework includes corepractices for promoting the computing culture, collaborating using computing, definingcomputational problems
computer, and the Internet.Suggested reasons for this success include an ambitious immigrant population, effective lawsand policies (e.g., effective patent and bankruptcy systems), well-funded corporate research labs,and venture capital availability35,39,65. So far in the twenty-first century, American companies andresearchers have maintained their lead in many areas, including in new fields like socialnetworking, gene therapy, and big data analytics. But recent statistics warn this lead may bewavering. America has gone from first to fourth among countries known for nurturing Page 26.1211.4innovation30. For the first time, the majority of
synthesis, fluid flow and heat transfer. Duncan has introduced a wide range of innovations into the chemical engineering programme at UCT, including collaborative study groups and the freshman course, as well as being involved in curriculum development and accreditation across the whole programme. He has published 19 articles in peer-reviewed journals on his technical research (mostly in the area of process synthesis) and 15 on engineering education (mostly on student learning).Hans Hoyer, American Society for Engineering Education Hans J. Hoyer, Ph.D. Director for International Programs and Strategy for ASEE and Deputy Secretary General of IFEES. Prior to coming to ASEE in early 2006, CEO of World
a pace thatkeeps them relevant in the marketplace.Freely available technical content placed online has additional implications for the future ofengineering education. Videos, articles, blog posts, and open educational resources (OER) areavailable on many platforms and with varying levels of both production value and (notnecessarily connected) accuracy. Particularly in the fast-changing technical core, how do weassure the credibility and accuracy of content? When faculty are using content as part of theircourses, it is reasonable to place the onus on the instructor. When students are doing independentstudy, are we helping them develop their own capacity for ensuring credibility of their sources?How do we help students build their own
AC 2012-3761: CAPSTONE DESIGN FACULTY MOTIVATION: MOTIVA-TIONAL FACTORS FOR TEACHING THE CAPSTONE DESIGN COURSEAND MOTIVATIONAL INFLUENCES ON TEACHING APPROACHESCory A. Hixson, Virginia Tech Cory A. Hixson is a graduate student in engineering education at Virginia Tech. Previous experience is in audio/visual engineering and K-12 math/science education. His research interests are in faculty motiva- tion, entrepreneurship, design education, K-12 engineering/STEM education, and research to practice in engineering educationDr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of engineering education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center
interests include cooperative control of multi-agent systems, flocking, and shoaling behavior in live animals, and distributed consensus algorithms analysis and computation.Mr. Ronald Leonel Poveda, Polytechnic Institute of New York University Ronald Poveda received a B.S. degree in mechanical engineering, summa cum laude, from NYU-Poly in 2009. Upon graduation, he started research for a Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering in the Composite Materials and Mechanics Lab. He is currently serving as a teaching Fellow at the Mott Hall Bridges Academy under NYU-Poly’s GK-12 program funded by NSF and CBSI consortium of donors. In the summer of 2008, he held a mechanical engineering internship position with Motorola, Inc
teaching approachesand students’ experiences. Lattuca and her colleagues’ [12] research on the culture and values ofengineering disciplines demonstrated that disciplinary contexts shape faculty members’ attitudesand behaviors. Recent research explores the idea of the culture of engineering education and theneed to understand this culture before we can effect systemic change [13, 14]. For example,Godfrey [15] showed that different engineering disciplines exhibited different cultures, or“cultures within cultures,” affecting the participation of women.Our project explores the different disciplinary cultures of EE, CpE, and ME as these fieldsprovide a sharply contrasting picture of engineering matriculation, persistence, and attrition forBlack
multi-cultural and multi-disciplinary settingthat provides the basis for robust and sustainable solutions. In this proceeding, we present ourobservations, challenges, and learnings garnered over eight years of hosting the summer schooland detail the current program design, which has evolved to reflect lessons learned.1. The ProgramThe US-Denmark research and education program, funded for the first three years by the DanishAgency for Science, Technology and Innovation and the following five years by US-NSF PIRE,is a cooperative and collaborative partnership between two US universities: Universities ofCalifornia, Santa Cruz and Davis (UCSC, UC Davis), and two Danish universities: AalborgUniversity (AAU) and the Technical University of Denmark
participating in studies on technologies for disability, overlookingtheir much-needed insight, and treating them as unequal engineering partners in the design andresearch processes [2]. Another literature survey focused on ASEE publications noted that therewas a significant lack of research focusing on disability as an identity and on the experiences ofstudents with disabilities in engineering education [3].Several works have explored the stigma, social exclusion, systemic marginalization, devaluation,and feelings of “otherness” experienced by students with disabilities in engineering education[4], [5]. These consequences were attributed to a variety of reasons, including the lack of rolemodels with disabilities, educators’ misconceptions about the
and engineers could effectively team withteachers in the classroom to stimulate a greater long-term interest among middle school studentsin science and mathematics.The VDP addresses the strategic vulnerability that our future Navy will face as a result of thesegenerational, educational, and budgetary realities. The program is exploring whether workingscientists and engineers with their real-world experiences can help shape positive perceptionsabout math and science among middle school students. More specifically, the VDP is testingwhether we can inspire more young people to see the value and relevancy of a future career inscience or engineering by: • Showing pre-teens and teens that math and science are fascinating, fun, and socially
design to gain a comprehensive understanding of engineering students experiences. In recent time, He was recognized as the outstanding doctoral researcher by the department of engineering education, USU. He and his colleagues received the Russel Sage grant to explore factors influencing the retention of Black immigrants with PhDs in the United States. Also, in April 2022. He won the best graduate poster presentation for the college of engineering in the student research symposium at Utah State University. Ibukun has a rich research experience in collaboration with his advisor and faculty in and outside of the United State. As an independent researcher, He is undertaking a systematic literature review and metanalysis on
two phases of a one-yearplanning project, funded by the National Science Foundation, to increase the representation ofcivil engineers with disabilities in the workforce. The purpose of this project is to build capacityfor engaging industry partners in a long-term collaboration under a shared goal of increasingworkforce accessibility for students with disabilities pursuing careers in civil engineering.Specific objectives for this project include: (1) synthesizing relevant literature; (2) identifyingand engaging industry stakeholders; (3) exploring collaborative tensions and synergies amongindustry stakeholders; and (4) developing a robust research agenda for the next phases of theproject.BackgroundDespite calls from the National Science
research labs with universityfunds, Imation financial support for graduate students and Senior Design projects, and the useof specialty Imation equipment essential to the studies being conducted. The dedication of thefaculty and Imation representatives to these activities should also be duly noted. Severalfederal agencies can now be effectively targeted for the submission of research proposals.Grant Opportunities for Academic Liaison with Industry (GOALI), a National ScienceFoundation (NSF) program, is especially appropriate for the activities at UND with Imation.The GOALI initiative aims to synergize collaborative research partnerships by making fundsavailable to support an mutually beneficial mix of industry/university linkages. Industry
that illustrate and assess these concepts. Instructorsunderstand from past teaching experiences what are the most common difficulties in theirsubjects. In informal interviews conducted by colleagues and education specialists,instructors identify difficult concepts in their disciplines, based on the learning objectivesand outcomes of their courses. The purpose of the interviews is to develop lists ofconcepts that are required to achieve the measurable outcomes, to select those conceptsthat are most difficult for students to master, and to document the known misconceptionswhich lead to learning difficulties.Instructional staff collaboration: In the large sophomore multidisciplinary core course, ateam of faculty, undergraduate and graduate
, personality, and assessment. He is director of the Individual and Team Performance Lab and the Virtual Team Performance, Innovation, and Collaboration Lab at the University of Calgary, which was built through a $500K Canada Foundation for Innovation Infrastructure Grant. He also holds operating grants of over $300K to conduct leading-edge research on virtual team effectiveness. Over the past 10 years Tom has worked with organizations in numerous industries includ- ing oil and gas, healthcare, technology, and venture capitals. He is currently engaged with the Schulich School of Engineering at the University of Calgary to train, develop, and cultivate soft-skill teamwork competencies in order to equip graduates with strong
experiences.Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on com- munication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring com- munication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication
promoting the retention and persistence of students of color in STEM” The Journal of Negro Education, vol. 80 no. 4, pp. 491–504, 2011.11. L. R. M. Hausmann, J. W. Schofield, and R. L. Woods, “Sense of belonging as a predictor of intentions to persist among African American and White first-year college students,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 48 no. 7, pp. 803-839, 2007.12. S. Hurtado, J. F. Milem, A. R. Clayton-Pedersen, and W. R. Allen, “Enhancing campus climates for racial/ethnic diversity: Educational policy and practice,” Review of Higher Education, vol. 21 no. 3, pp. 279-302, 1998.13. S. Hurtado, J. F. Milem, A. R. Clayton-Pedersen, and W. R. Allen, “Enacting diverse learning environments: Improving the climate for
, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Jutshi Agarwal is a Postdoctoral Associate with the Department of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo. She was the first doctoral student to get a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from the University of Cincinnati. She also has a Master’s degree in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Cincinnati and a Bachelor’s degree in Aerospace Engineering from SRM University, India. Her research areas of interest are graduate student professional development for a career in academia, preparing future faculty, and using AI tools to solve non-traditional problems in engineering education. She is currently also furthering work on the agency of engineering
another institution. The nature of the joint relationship primarily impacts thestudents in that they must take 16 to 18 credit hours of coursework through InteractiveTelevision (ITV) from the partnering institution.Typically, project experiences are integrated into specific courses and few of them have involvedworking with students in other engineering disciplines. As these programs grow and mature,faculty are exploring opportunities for collaborative projects that cross disciplinary borders inorder to aid the students maturity and growth in a profession where these borders are growingless defined1. This paper presents preliminary findings on the value of cross disciplinaryprojects, employing a case study where a group of Civil Engineering
include a section on science. While the results of these tests may not behigh stakes in terms of sanctions on a school, district or individual teacher, they certainly havehigh stakes for the students as their scores determine whether or not they will graduate from highschool. As a result, there is an ongoing tension between STEM-related reforms, often initiated byfederal agencies and universities, and test preparation practices K-12 educators perceive willresult in higher scores on standardized tests. To further complicate matters, standardized testsconsist of largely multiple choice questions and are therefore not necessarily reliable indicatorsof students’ reasoning and problem solving skills (Burkhardt, 2012). Despite researchers
2001.5 Even with this strongrecord, we strive to attract more minorities into our engineering programs.Retention is a key issue related to graduation rates. Science and engineering fields report thelowest retention rates among all academic disciplines. Approximately 50% of students enteringhigher education in the sciences or engineering change majors in the first two years. Moreover,women and underrepresented minorities leave science and engineering programs at a higher ratethan men and non-minority students.6 For the 2002-2003 academic year at UT’s College ofEngineering, first year retention of women (69.4%) and minorities (69.4%) was lower thanretention of all engineering students (74.3%). In year two, women fared better with a retentionrate
of these needs lead to greater psychological well-being. Asshown in Figure 1, we hypothesize that classroom instructors and environment factors contributeto students’ fulfillment of autonomy, competence and relatedness needs, which in turn contributeto greater motivation as measured through self-reported course engagement.Figure 1: Proposed relationship between classroom environment, SDT constructs and students’engagement in lecture and workshop activitiesResearch on Student Autonomy, Competence, and RelatednessAlthough much of the work exploring self-determination among students is quantitative andfocuses on primary and secondary school students, such research has shown promising tiesbetween need fulfillment and indicators of course
-10 school year and the ASEE Pacific Northwest Section Outstanding Teaching Award in 2014.Ms. Tessa Alice Olmstead, Highline College Tessa holds a bachelor’s degree in Bioengineering from the University of Washington, and a second bach- elor’s degree in Dance. She is currently researching the use of reflective practices to improve engineering education at Highline College. She also serves as a research scientist for the Department of Neurosurgery at the University of Washington.Ms. Judy Mannard PE, Highline Community College c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Changing Student Behavior through the Use of Reflective Teaching Practices in an Introduction to
the recently published results, employers rated the careerreadiness proficiency of new graduates lower, in some cases significantly, when compared tostudents’ self-ratings (NACE (a), 2018). Thus, a skills gap may exist.NACE defines career readiness as “the attainment and demonstration of requisite competenciesthat broadly prepare college graduates for a successful transition into the workplace” (NACE,2017). The aforementioned definition was created in 2015 through a task force including bothcollege and employer representatives. This definition provides a common language surroundingcareer readiness and allows for increased cooperation and collaboration between colleges anduniversities and employers. Additionally, it provides a framework that
Mathematicsinstruction and the Engineering instruction. Under the leadership of Alan Van Heuvelen thesections for the FEH students incorporated active learning in large (~72 students) sections andcollaborative learning in the recitations and laboratory exercises (~24 students).22-23 Thelaboratory exercises are set up for experiential learning. The students are organized intoLearning Teams for the collaborative work including taking 12 percent of their midterm examsas a team. This part of their examinations consists of a complex problem that the team mustbreak into parts, solve the parts, and then assemble the partial solutions to solve the problemposed. On nationally normed exams these students have produced test results that are among thetop in the USA
communication andnetworking among students, staff and alumni; develop and execute programs to recruit girls andretain women in science and technology; provide mentoring for freshmen, shadowing withalumni for upperclassmen and licensure and exam preparation for graduates; and formpartnerships with organizations (educational, professional, community and youth), businessesand corporations to assist in introducing women to the various opportunities in science andtechnology. In support of these goals, WIT has series of programming initiatives to meet thesegoals that include recruiting events, professional skills development workshops, academicsupport, industrial tours, networking events with engineering professionals, community buildingsocial activities
better equipped for ethical design. Asan active force, love could also shape communication and collaboration in design, fostering careand a more expansive vision for diverse forms of engagement.This research examines the theoretical foundations and classroom applications of love as a coretopic of knowledge in secondary and postsecondary engineering education. It explores how love,both as a subject of study and conceptual lens, shapes students’ self-reflection, ethicalunderstanding, and relational dynamics in life and design contexts. The paper presents atransdisciplinary framework for love, applies it to holistic design thinking, and outlines theresearch methodology, classroom insights, and potential for future educational pedagogies.It
structures.To increase students’ learning, two teaching methods were used: case studies and problem-basedlearning (PBL). These methods were well-suited for teaching prospective scientists and engineersbecause they focus on cooperative sharing of ideas as well as healthy discussion and resolution ofproblematic issues [10, 11]. PBL-structured case studies promote higher-order learning skills, suchas application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. During case study-based learning modules,students were presented with a selected case to resolve the core issue by critically evaluating theinformation they had researched. They had opportunities to find the latest developments in a fieldand associate them with most recent social issues. This approach overcame