objective includes five related project outputs: (1) energy-efficient new house design; (2)optimized solar PV system designs for new and existing homes; (3) optimized household componentselection (lights, appliances, and other electric devices); (4) research of shallow geothermal energyoptions using manually drilled wells; and (5) energy conservation promotion planning. The objective andoutputs 2, 4, and 5 (the foci of this paper) are described below.Project Objective: To design homes that are energy-efficient, optimized for the use of solar PV systems,and affordable for the average homeowner.Most sustainable home energy systems are typically marketed to those with relatively high incomes,while disadvantaged households and communities fall by the
smaller assignments. In all three collaborations lesson plans were implementedusing the BSCS 5E instructional model, which was aligned to the engineering design process.Instruments were developed to assess knowledge in collaborations 1 (engineering designprocess) and 3 (computational thinking), while in collaboration 2, knowledge was assessed withquestions from the fundamentals of engineering exam and a science content assessment.Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness (CATME) was also used in all 3collaborations to assess teamwork across the collaborations. Finally, each student wrote areflection on their experiences, which was used to qualitatively assess the project impact. Theresults from the first full semester of
here on how Project TESAL participating teachersshifted their stance toward ambiguity, developed comfort with the design process for integratingmathematics and science instruction, and how their lesson plans and focus group interviewsrevealed such change over time. We discuss findings from analyses of data across three yearsfrom content knowledge tests (Diagnostic Mathematics Assessments for Middle School Teachers[DTAMS]), surveys (Teacher Efficacy and Attitudes Toward STEM [T-STEM], individualinterviews and focus groups, teacher generated design lesson plans, and observations asparticipating teachers implemented lessons in their classrooms.Teachers who participated all three years discussed the integration of engineering design,complex
features aredeepening content knowledge, promotion of active learning, fostering coherence, perceivedenhancement of knowledge and skills, and influence in teachers’ classroom teaching practice [2].Their results suggest that sustained and intensive professional development that focuses onspecific academic subject matter, coupled with planning for classroom implementation andalignment with national and state standards is more likely to produce enhanced knowledge andskills. This paper discusses the evolution of the Bioengineering Experience for ScienceTeachers (BEST) Program at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC). As the largest urbanpublic research institute in Chicago, our Research 1 university is proud to serve an extremelydiverse
with engineering department faculty, staff, advisors, andfemale students. By understanding how and why elective tracks become gendered withinengineering majors, we hope to identify effective strategies for improving the preparation ofwomen to pursue technical roles and career paths in their chosen field of study, with the broadgoal of improving the workplace retention of female engineers.As this project is ongoing, we plan to present preliminary results based on wave one (1)interviews with 30 female engineering students in their sophomore year (the year when electivetrack selections are made).Project Background and Theoretical FrameworkExisting research shows that men and women in gender-typed occupations – such as engineering– often
coordination, strategic planning and administrative support for the internationalization of the campus, which includes the Education Abroad Office, Partnerships and Exchanges, International Student and Scholar Services, an Intensive English Program, faculty development programs, and cross-cultural learning living communi- ties. Amy has been at the University of Dayton since 1998, and has over 30 years experience working in a variety of international education programs. Amy has also worked in the areas of international admission, international student advising and study abroad. She has taught at both the graduate and undergraduate levels in the U.S., Chile, Thailand and the British Virgin Islands, and speaks both French and
participation (e.g., as subjects in research studies) with an uncertain value proposition.Research method innovations are needed to reduce barriers to access, minimize risks and costs toparticipants, and more quickly generate actionable insights for partner firms.Given the preceding discussion of trends and challenges, we plan to carry out and investigate theefficacy of multi-institutional, multi-sites field research using novel methods such as agileethnography, trace ethnography, and network ethnography. These methods are new andevolving, and thus have scarcely been used to study engineering practice. Yet they appear verypromising given their potential to generate research findings much more rapidly and with a
promote AR-based renewable energy applications for engineering andtechnology students in different institutions. IntroductionEmergency management of natural disasters is an essential role of government. Emergencymanagement was organized in 1979 with the creation of the Federal Emergency ManagementAgency (FEMA). Since that time, many states and local cities have changed the names of theirorganizations to include the words: emergency management. There are four phases of emergencymanagement: mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery. Mitigation includes activities thatprevent an emergency or reduce the damaging effects of unavoidable hazards. Preparedness phaseincludes developing plans for what to do
-disciplinary class environment and ensure the interaction across disciplines,the course was designed with the following considerations and resulting structure.ConsiderationsThe target audience for the course were engineering graduate students and juniors/seniors. Theengineering department has a graduate program only for the EE major, and the class of 17students was made up of three groups of similar sizes coincidently, including five EE graduates(EE-g), six EE undergraduates (EE-u), and six ME undergraduates (ME-u). Pre-requisites forthe course include Signals and Systems and Mechanics of Materials for EE-u and ME-u students,respectively. Thus, according to the curriculum plan, enrolled EE and ME majors should have aproper background on basic circuit
. 5 Cohort 8 DemographicsIn State (PA Residents): 7Out of State (Non-PA Resident): 22 6 Objectives • Share the key components and structure of the remote Summer Bridge • Data benchmarking the first-year students’ academic progress • sense of belonging compared to past students with a residential Bridge experience • Lessons learned and best practices • Provide tangible action items that can be replicated across different programs and campusesObjectives of presentation – from abstract 7Summer Bridge 2020 Timeline• April: Planning for remote bridge• May: Hiring
, or study. Role identities are contextually specific and as such, we haveformulated questions for engineering, science, or computer science consistent with previouswork in mathematics, science, and engineering [1], [13], [14]. Students will choose the field ofstudy most relevant to them to answer these questions, as ERC's are interdisciplinary and mayinvolve students from across STEM solving engineering programs. Third, items measuringstudent pathways and sustained interest were developed for this study from The ERC EvaluationConsortium's Multi Engineering Research Center Instrument Inventory [30] to assess thestudent's willingness to continue their STEM paths, such as the pursuit of additional degrees andwhich career plans they might
Technology students had already completed the requirement.Others students wanted to go but couldn’t justify the extra cost involved for food, transportation,and housing. Thus, only five students were actually enrolled by early October. A “Plan B” wasneeded to get the course, and exchange program, off the ground.Arrangements were made with the Packaging and Engineering Technology Program Directors toallow MFGT 341 in Darmstadt as a substitute for another course, MFGT 251 Plastics Materialsand Processes. MFGT 251 is one of a three course materials series required by both degrees.Normally MFGT 251 is a prerequisite for MFGT 341. Because non-plastics concentrationEngineering Technology and Packaging graduates who work in the plastics industry have a
. Moreover, among all engineering fields, electrical engineering has oneof the largest gender gaps. That is, the women’s representation in electrical and computerengineering fields is only 10% compared to for example 35% in chemical engineering 4 .In order to improve the situation of women in electrical and computer engineering fields,we designed and organized a summer camp for middle school girls enrolled in grades 6-8(11-13 years of age). This is part of a three year educational and outreach plan supportedby a National Science Foundation award. The first edition of this camp was held in 2012 inthe Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) at North Dakota StateUniversity (NDSU). In this paper, we present details about the first
outreach project at Daniel Hale Elementary School which provides civil engineering lesson plans, afterschool pro- grams, family workshops and field trips. Prof. Villatoro is the Project Director for the Peer Advisement program sponsored by Perkins and designed to increase retention of females across the School of Tech- nology and Design.Laurin Moseley, CUNY New York City College of Technology American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Benefits of the virtual platform for K-12 STEM OutreachAbstractThe number of students enrolling and graduating with STEM degrees in the United States mustincrease exponentially in order to meet the predicted job
, and discuss the application process. • Make a compelling (clearly argued, articulated, inspiring, and well prepared) presentation about how their international experiences are relevant and beneficial to becoming a successful engineer. • Anticipate the cultural demands that may accompany international business travel and formulate a plan to compensate for such needs, including identifying appropriate resources to investigate how one can professionally engage with the target culture. • Discover opportunities for international internships, careers, and fellowships. • Reflect and build upon intercultural learning experiences and to consider ways to apply their knowledge, skills, and perspectives
only continue to grow until it becomes a serious problem. Inthe words of a fellow student, Kayla Bensley, when asked what her school could do to improverecycling, she answered: “Rowan could do everything better because they do not do anything.When I lived in [the freshman dorm] there weren't any recycling bins on my floor at all, and it isconcerning how little they care. I am also pretty sure they do not recycle things put in recyclingbins.”Objective In order to be able to increase the recycling rate at Rowan University, there has to be aplan put in place. The start of every plan to raise awareness requires an introduction of theproblem to the campus community. As seen in other places similar to this university, a SWACOpoll in central
communication competencies needed for successful civil andenvironmental engineering practice. To address this gap, the civil engineering curriculum addeda new course entitled Communicating with Stakeholders in Engineering. This course coverstopics including communication theory, stakeholder identification, communicating throughconflict, communication planning, implicit bias, public engagement principles, and more. Thecontent was selected to fill the gaps in traditional communication classes taken by civilengineering students to expose students to tools and approaches to workplace communicationand communication with public stakeholder groups. The topics covered in the course allowstudents to develop an understanding of and gain extensive practice with
expected to be junior or senior rank and must continue contactsocieties in order to build both the social and professional with the freshman students throughout the academic year.connections. Phase 1 in career development is to The class mentor is intended to play a major role in the course.understand one’s self. Activities in the course provideThe course sections were specifically required to remainopportunities for personal exploration and the use of small, 20 - 25 students, in order to promote a casualcareer planning tools. Tennessee Tech University is environment and allow for a personal connection with thetasked with developing a Quality Enhancement Plan that professor, the
. NIST’s National Initiativefor Cybersecurity Education (NICE) working group has made it strategic plan objective toincrease participation by women, minorities and veterans in cybersecurity1.Cybersecurity competitions have been promoted as a way to increase participation incybersecurity-related fields amongst high school students. Typical cybersecurity competitions atthe secondary school level currently focus on a very narrow set of computer-technical relatedactivities. These competitions are rewarding to students who have traditionally been attracted tocomputer-related fields. However, these participants of the competitions are not typically diversein gender or race2. The lack of diversity in cybersecurity competitions is a large problem if
committee on ”survey of the state of the practice on traffic responsive plan selection control.” He is also a member of the Transportation Research Board (TRB) Traffic Signal Systems committee, Artificial Intel- ligence and Advanced Computing Applications committee, and the joint subcommittee on Intersection. In addition, he is currently a chair on a task group on Agent-based modeling and simulation as part of the TRB SimSub committee. He also serves as a CEE faculty senator at Virginia Tech. Dr. Abbas is a recipient of the Oak Ridge National Lab Associated Universities (ORAU) Ralf E. Powe Junior Faculty Enhancement Award and the G. V. Loganathan Faculty Achievement Award for Excellence in Civil Engineering Education. He
. Mathematics: Mathematics instruction was designed to reduce loss in proficiency during the summer and support the 3D modeling and app development curriculum. Topics included geometry, mathematics tricks and shortcuts, division, exponents, square roots and logic. Entrepreneurship: Participants were introduced to entrepreneurial ventures through topics like marketing, financing, business models and visits from local technology entrepreneurs. Final Project: In the fourth week, participant teams were asked to develop an entrepreneurial venture. The teams brainstormed and refined a concept that integrated an app, a 3D model, business plan and a website or social media page. Ventures ideated were a) Customized key chain with GPS locator, b) Online
they are working towarddegree completion.Program ManagementThis one-of-a-kind scholarship program has a complex structure and requires carefulcoordination. Because the program continues to evolve and develop, we created a checklist toensure all key tasks are correctly completed throughout the year (see Appendix A). The checklistcomponents include information on marketing and recruitment, communications, student supportservices, event coordination, and program evaluation and assessment activities; and it is crucialfor replicating and improving program management. In some aspects, the working checklistbecomes a reflective journal for the current year. While there were aspects we planned out beforeimplementation, some facets of the program are
curves and surfaces started to appear at a very rapid rate. NC machinesequipped to take NC codes from such packages marked the third generation of NCmachines. Traditionally machines were developed for individual processes and hencethere are drilling machines, planning machines, shaping machines, boring machinesand so on. The third generation started to combine the capabilities of some of thesemachines and the machining centers were born. The combination of functions in onemachine gathered momentum resulting in a change in the entire product concept andthe machine architecture itself changed completely to accommodate differentfunctions. This together with advancements in CAD into feature based modelling,gave rise to the fourth generation of NC
) provides an opportunityfor vertical integration across courses within CCEM curriculum. The goal of introducingsustainability concepts is two-fold: to enhance undergraduate students’ interest in andunderstanding of sustainability by engaging them in real-world sustainability projects; and toprovide students with necessary knowledge for advancing a career in sustainability withinCCEM. The PBL framework is developed and implemented at "Arizona State University" between alower-division construction management course, Construction Materials, Methods andEquipment (CON252) and an upper-division/graduate cross-disciplinary course between civilengineering course, sustainability, and planning, Urban Infrastructure Anatomy and SustainableDevelopment (CEE
advocacy-network paradigm,with special attention upon the quality of the relationships and the mentoring activities.Survey InstrumentAn online 35-item survey was developed for this study to gather opinions on the quality of thementoring relationship; the mentoring received; the career development, sponsorship, andcoaching activities engaged in; as well as the quantity of contact (Fowler, 2009; Sue & Ritter,2012). The survey was based upon prior interviews in which participants were asked to share thementoring and advocacy-networking paradigm activities planned in their mentoring matches.The survey was closed-ended with a mix of factual, categorical response options (Yes/No) andopinion, continuous response options (Likert-scales). The survey
Paper ID #19497Work in Progress: Living with the Lab: Building a New Implementation ofthe LWTL Project-Based First-Year Engineering Curriculum at CampbellUniversityDr. Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University Dr. Carpenter is Founding Dean of Engineering at Campbell University. She is Chair of the ASEE Long-Rangge Planning Committee and the ASEE Strategic Doing Governance Team. She is a past Vice President of Professional Interest Councils for ASEE and past President of WEPAN. Currently Chair of the National Academy of Engineering Grand Challenge Scholars Program Steering Committee and an ASEE PEV for General Engineering, Dr
going offof the track and not having used any parts of a commercially available hovercraft in the design.The hovercraft could only be powered by a battery. For the research component, students wereasked to review the literature on the history of hovercrafts and provide a brief summary of themajor milestones in their evolution.Program ImplementationA total of 16 middle (grades 7-8) and 20 high school (grades 9-12) students participated in theengineering design course over a four month period. The high school class consisted of 70% malesand 30% females while the middle school class was composed of 69% males and 31% females.The course began with an introduction of the five steps (ask, imagine, plan, create and improve)involved in the EDP. Each
thinking involves considering holistic approaches toproblem-solving that understand and analyze the complexity of various elements and theirinterrelationships in the overall ecosystem (McKenna, Froyd, & Litzinger, 2014). Strategicthinking is the ability to create a plan of action to achieve the desired vision and act upon theother ways of thinking (Warren et al., 2014).Guided by this framework, the research question addressed by the study is: What is the factor structure that captures futures, values, systems, and strategic thinking associated with interdisciplinary engineering education research?Research MethodsInstrument DevelopmentThe survey instrument (see Appendix) was developed through iterative construction andvalidation
team members Equal contribution Active application of one’s communication skills The practice of sharing and receiving ideas from group Group decision making members to allow for alternatives and decide on an agreed upon course of action as a group Goal/task planning/setting The ability to craft a plan and follow through in executing it The practice of treating other team members with respect, using positive word choice, employing non-judgmental tones Team cohesiveness to communicate verbally or non-verbally
. Dr. Bhavsar received his Ph.D. degree in 2013 and his M.S. degree in 2006 from Clemson University. His Ph.D. dissertation focused on development of an evaluation framework for connected vehicle technology supported alternative fuel vehicles. Dr. Bhavsar also has three years of experience in the private sector in developing transportation engineering and planning solutions, specifically traffic micro-simulation projects.Dr. Seri Park, Villanova University Seri Park, PhD, PTP, is an Assistant Professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Villanova University. She is serving as a member of the Undergraduate Curriculum Committee for the CEE Department. She is also the faculty advisor of the