include a section on science. While the results of these tests may not behigh stakes in terms of sanctions on a school, district or individual teacher, they certainly havehigh stakes for the students as their scores determine whether or not they will graduate from highschool. As a result, there is an ongoing tension between STEM-related reforms, often initiated byfederal agencies and universities, and test preparation practices K-12 educators perceive willresult in higher scores on standardized tests. To further complicate matters, standardized testsconsist of largely multiple choice questions and are therefore not necessarily reliable indicatorsof students’ reasoning and problem solving skills (Burkhardt, 2012). Despite researchers
Engineering Experiment Station, TAMUS TEES Research Scientist, Texas A&M University System Internal Evaluator and Data Collector for TAMUS LSAMPDr. Shannon D. Walton, Texas A&M University Shannon D. Walton, PhD, is the Director of Recruiting for the Office of Graduate and Professional Stud- ies and the Director of Educational Achievement for the Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. Holding dual positions, Dr. Walton’s responsibilities range from the recruitment and retention of a talented and diverse graduate student population to the management of science, technol- ogy, engineering and mathematics (STEM) programs, like the NSF-funded Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation
learning experiences and students designing to learn.Dr. Abhaya K. Datye, University of New Mexico Abhaya Datye has been on the faculty at the University of New Mexico after receiving his PhD in Chem- ical Engineering at the University of Michigan in 1984. He is presently Chair of the department and Distinguished Regents Professor of Chemical & Biological Engineering. From 1994-2014 he served as Director of the Center for Microengineered Materials, a strategic research center at UNM that reports to the Vice President for Research. He is also the founding director of the graduate interdisciplinary program in Nanoscience and Microsystems, the first program at UNM to span three schools and colleges and the Anderson
to his graduate work in the United States, he obtained his Bachelor’s degree from Malaysia and has participated in research projects involving offshore structures in Malaysia. As a graduate part-time instructor at Texas Tech University, he teaches an intro- ductory course in engineering to freshmen undergraduate students. He has taught at Texas Tech University since the fall of 2013.Mr. Siddhartha Gupta, Texas Tech University Siddhartha Gupta is a third-year PhD student in the department of Chemical Engineering at Texas Tech. He received a bachelor’s degree in chemical engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology and subsequently worked as shift engineer for two years with a Fortune 500 chemical company
the College of Integrative Sciences and Arts at Arizona State University. Marvyn’s research interest include Latino/a Career Development and Multicultural Counseling Competencies. For instance, his research examines environmental and socio-cognitive variables associated with academic attainment among Latino/as in higher education.Wen Huang, Arizona State University PhD. student, Engineering Education Systems and Design (PhD) The Polytechnic School Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering Arizona State UniversityDr. Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University Ann F. McKenna is a Professor in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering and Director of The Poly- technic School at Arizona State University. Prior to joining
efforts that acknowledge learner diversity, and understand their effects in students performance. Isabel received her professional degree in biological engineering at the Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile and her MA in policy, organizations and leadership studies at Stanford Graduate School of Education.Dr. Constanza Miranda Mendoza, Pontificia Universidad Catholica de Chile Constanza Miranda holds a PhD in design with a focus in anthropology from North Carolina State Uni- versity. While being a Fulbright grantee, Constanza worked as a visiting researcher at the Center for Design Research, Mechanical Engineering Department, at Stanford. Today she is an assistant professor at the P.Universidad Cat´olica de Chile’s
sense.”Requirements of Continuous ImprovementWhen asked “External quality assurance is important at Purdue for what purposes orobjectives? Why it is important for these things?” respondents all identify the importance andlegality of ABET in promoting the quality assurance in engineering education within collegesand universities. The interviewees all recognized the importance of program accreditation byarticulating “it is a reasonably good job which particularly takes our graduate criteria,” “it isimportant process which is reasonable for university like Purdue to go back to check with theuniversity to make sure the thing that they should be doing,” “ABET accreditation is veryimportant that they want to assure that program that the students
tookplace at a selected HBCU in US for an overarching goal of improving students’ learningexperiences and outcomes. For this purpose, authors have proposed a project to widen theimplementation of evidence-based pedagogies in STEM education at an HBCU in US andsystematically capture the changes in STEM faculty’s approaches to teaching and understandingof their students’ learning. The project was funded by the department of education and initiatedin 2015. The purpose of the study we present here was to explore and document the changes inSTEM faculty’s approaches to teaching and understanding of learning because of theirparticipation in the project activities.Literature Review Widening research-based pedagogies in higher education and
view might overestimate thedifferences between the two and miss the common ground that provides the potential for the kindof regulatory coherence that would be required to make the TTIP and other forms ofinternational cooperation possible. As we hope this paper makes clear, it takes a great deal ofresearch and analysis to understand the complexities of differences in legal and regulatorysystems and how those systems relate to differences in values and preferences. From a curricularpoint of view, we cannot reasonably expect to provide students with all the kinds of knowledgethey would need to collaborate across all polities globally (any more than we could expect themto learn all the languages their engineering collaborators might speak). We
that necessitate engineers’ abilities to work cooperatively and learnto incorporate diverse perspectives, specializations, and values into the design process. The highlysocial nature of design work itself 2,8 requires novice engineering students to learn about,recognize, and practice the social sides of engineering, an effort advanced by many researchersand practitioners in recent years.4,9,10,11,12 Yet much of the extant literature has failed toincorporate insights from organizational and team research outside of engineering education andrelated disciplines.3This study focuses on the emergence of technical and ethical relations in design project teams.While technical coordination has long been a primary consideration for both scholars
theunknown motives and actions of the other team members. While effective and appropriate teamleadership is often identified by students as a major factor in team success, a more fundamentalattribute of a successful team is trust among its members.This research study will identify and explore the role of trust in the dynamics of successful firstyear engineering design teams at our multidisciplinary university in the eastern United States.We are using a conceptual framework for the formation of trust in a team-based environment,which has been formed by studies of successful business, technical and sports teams. Despitedifferences in maturity and experience, engineering students have a lot in common with theseolder team members, because both groups
encounters with the Other. (This is most obvious in her latest new course, A Global State of Mind.) Whatever the subject, her courses are grounded in accountability–to the text, to oneself, and to one’s fellows.Ms. Robyn Sandekian, University of Colorado, Boulder Robyn Sandekian is the Managing Director of the Mortenson Center in Engineering for Developing Com- munities (MCEDC) at the University of Colorado Boulder (CU Boulder). She joined the Engineering for Developing Communities Program (now known as the Mortenson Center) in spring 2004, just as the first EDC graduate track was approved. With MCEDC, her main duties have included student advising and academic program development. Recently, she co-developed the
of low enrollment and even more serious problem of high dropout in bothprograms. Researchers of science, technology, engineering and math, also known as STEM, [1]propose that one of the problem for student’s retention and recruitment in STEM program is thatthey are not able to associate themselves to this area. Institute of Electrical and ElectronicEngineers (IEEE) and the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) support engagementamong school and university students [8]. A pilot study reported in [9] of beginner studentsindicates that students in Computer Science and other related fields reason, engage and relate tothe knowledge content of the discipline.In [2] authors present a model named Supporting Collaboration and Adaptation in a
Science Foundation (NSF) established aDivision of Engineering to provide more focused support for engineering education and research.The National Academy of Engineering, a private, non-profit institution whose goal was toprovide leadership and advice on matters related to engineering and technology, was alsofounded in 1964.During the 1950s student enrollments in engineering programs increased at all levels, especiallyafter 1955. Undergraduate enrollments, including part-time students, rose from 142,954 in 1950to 205,765 in 1964.[5] Enrollments continued to increase through the 1960s as members of theBaby Boom generation reached college age. At the graduate level enrollment growth wasespecially strong. In 1950, the number of master’s and doctoral
Single Sex Debate for Girls in Science: A Comparison BetweenTwo Informal Science Programs on Middle School Students’ STEM Identity Formation. Research in Science Education, 43(5),1979–2007. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9345-7Kemp, R.L. (2005). The impact of gender-specific and mixed-gender cooperative groups on female gifted students usingcomputer-assisted, problem-based learning. A thesis submitted to the Graduate School, Valdosta State University. In partialfulfillment of requirements for the degree of Education Specialist in Instructional Technology in the Department ofCurriculum and Instructional Technology of the College of Education. Retrieved fromhttp://chiron.valdosta.edu/are/vol4no1/pdf/kemprarticle.pdfKim, J. (2011). Modeling
engineeringeducation methodologies such as cooperative learning and taking a student-centered approachhave improved first-year engineering student engagement and retention into the second year1.Specifically, one major aim of the coalition is for first-year engineering students to participate ina full design project. The freshman honors engineering program at this university includes a 10week-long robotics design project in the second semester which follows these guidelines of thecoalition. This honors robotics design project is unique among other design projects by the largescope and infinite possibilities for students to tackle the problem and design a solution. Forexample, students have the opportunities to build their own robot structures and
Paper ID #18381How Role-Playing Builds Empathy and Concern for Social JusticeLeslie Dodson, Worcester Polytechnic InstituteDr. David DiBiasio, Worcester Polytechnic Institute David DiBiasio is Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering and Department Head of ChE at WPI. He received his ChE degrees from Purdue University, worked for the DuPont Co, and has been at WPI since 1980. His current interests are in educational research: the process of student learning, international engineering education, and educational assessment. Collaboration with two colleagues resulted in being awarded the 2001 William Corcoran Award from
representation of women among first year engineering students, it pales in comparison tooverall representation of women students in four year institutions, which reached 57% in 2014.Clearly, work to increase gender diversity in engineering must continue (Pryor, Hurtado, Saenz,Santos & Korn 2007; National Research Council, 2006).The paucity of women in engineering is particularly evident at technical institutions where moststudents major in a STEM discipline. As such, these institutions face a significant genderdisparity in their student populations. For example, at the university where this research wasconducted, approximately 96% of undergraduates are working toward degrees in engineering,the natural sciences, mathematics, or computer science
ideal setting for the advancement of physical activity (Keating, et al., 2005; Huang, et al., 22003). To this end, researchers have suggested a greater effort on the part of college faculty andadministration to increase student awareness of the benefits of physical activity and offer moreprograms designed to get students active (Lowry, et al., 2000; Keating, et al., 2005; Kwan, et al.,2012). Among the goals of the American College Health Association’s Healthy Campus 2020initiative is for colleges to “create social and physical environments that promote good health forall” (2010, p. 1). According to Dr. James Pivarnik of the American College of Sports Medicine,"The built environment, as we call
and Power Systems, Industrial Automation and Control system. As part of HBCU-ECP project he teaches EE and non-EE students how to utilize the board for in class experiments and other design projects. He is also currently doing a collaborative research with a local industry in smart grid. Dr. Osareh can be reached at osareh@ncat.eduDr. Lisa D. Hobson, Prairie View A&M University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #19862Dr. Lisa Hobson is Associate Professor of Educational Leadership at Prairie View A&M University andhas served in the professorate since 1999. She holds a Ph. D. in
of accreditation andquality assurance bodies, the lack of practical and laboratory activities to train students in theappropriate skills that are required in engineering practice.Almhaidib (2013) stated that, in today's globally competitive world, the contribution ofengineering colleges in the technical development of each country is considered significant. Thisdevelopment takes place through involvement in a wide range of economic development projectsby utilizing intellectual property development and creating partnerships with industry, which alsocreates opportunities for research and students training. The author further adds: “The general philosophy of engineering education is to produce graduates with high academic standing
participatingstudents graduated with a STEM degree. Interviews collected in this project are previouslypublished on the IEEE Engineering Technology and History Wiki (ETHW). Following the oralhistory interviews, the students write reflections to answer the following three research questions(RQ). RQ#1 is “What are the key factors that led to the success of the distinguished leaders?.”RQ#2 is “What are the crucial skills that enabled their success?.” RQ#3 is “What is the impacton my career path?”One objective of this paper is for the participating female students, who are majoring in STEMfields, to present their reflections on the three research questions. A second objective is for thestudents to describe the impact, if any, that carrying out interviews of
-class overhead, (4) Answers would be scored in real time and the scores counted towardfinal grades to encourage attendance and problem ownership, (5) Multiple attempts would be per-mitted, (6) Collaborative learning among class mates and seeking help from the instructional staffwould be encouraged, (7) Different parameterizations of each problem would be delivered to eachstudent to ensure strategy, as opposed to answer, sharing, (8) A course website listing assignedreadings, lecture videos, and simple pre-class problems would be posted for students’ preparation,and (9) The content difficulty and frequency of homework and exams would remain the same asthe lecture-based section to maintain course continuity. The leveraging of existing
courses to offer team collaboration activities.Table 5.2 lists survey results for each course that piloted GLASS. Across the three pilotedcourses, student perceptions were overwhelming positive on scale of: {-2 (Strongly Disagree), -1(Disagree), 0 (Neutral), 1 (Agree), 2 (Strongly Agree)}. Foremost, results analyzed usingANOVA indicate the transportability of GLASS across a range of STEM disciplines, includingComputer Science, Industrial Engineering, and Electrical/Computer Engineering. In particular,ANOVA analysis indicated that there were no significant differences among the three courses inmost of the survey questions except the last question: “Etherpad/Cacoo tools were sufficientlyeasy to learn:” whereby F(2, 176) = 4.966, p = .008. While
), BGSU’s performance fellconsistently below the national average. The reasons for this decline, according to programfaculty, staff, and students, included marginalization of the capstone course in the curriculum,lax enforcement of course prerequisites, inconsistent exam weighting, and student apathy. Thesubstandard results appeared not to be due to insufficient student engagement outside of theclassroom, given that the program offers three cooperative education opportunities, inter-collegiate student academic competitions, and an active industry advisory board. Rather, itseemed that there was room for improving student engagement in program coursework.Student engagement is associated with student retention (Astin 1993, 1999) and may help
practices. Outcomes such as intention to stay orleave engineering along with reasons for doing so will be measured and related to measuredclimate variables.8. SummaryIn this paper, we have described progress in the second year of our RED efforts in CBEE inwhich we have worked to re-situate instruction and learning to create a more inclusive,professionally-based learning environment woven throughout both curricular and co-curricularexperiences for students. Within our design-based implementation research approach, it isdifficult (and perhaps unwise) to specifically envision how the activity systems in CBEE will betransformed by the end of this five-year project. We do, however, aspire to compiling, assessingand evaluating evidence over time that
Center which promote innovation and entrepreneurship among engineering students and in collaborations with other colleges on campus and partnering with other institutions across the country.Dr. Donna C. Llewellyn, Boise State University Donna Crystal Llewellyn received her BA (major in Mathematics and minor in Economics) with High Honors from Swarthmore College in 1980. She went on to earn an MS in Operations Research from Stanford University in 1981 and a Ph.D. in Operations Research from Cornell University in 1984. After 30 years at Georgia Tech in a variety of roles, Donna became the Executive Director of the new Institute for STEM and Diversity Initiatives at Boise State University in January 2015. Donna’s current
libraries can be so fortunate, and must put in extra effort to make their 3D printingservice a successful initiative. Pryor 28 described the University of Southern Illinois-Edwardsville Lovejoy Library’s 3D printing service as a “mixed bag” because of theexpressed excitement from both students and faculty, but relatively low usage numbers. Heposited the reasons could have included a lack of access to 3D modeling software or familiaritywith the creation of 3D models, patrons simply being unaware of 3D model repositories withready to print objects on the web, or the campus community had yet to grasp how 3D printingtechnology can be useful in scholarship, research and other creative activities. Zuberbier, et al 7shared a similar story of high interest
database and query processing The database is written in Java and SQLite. Using Java and html, we interact with thedatabase using a locally hosted web interface that serves as the GUI. For LS written byindividual students, the tables include one for the assignment, one for the student, and one tablefor the LS. We show the attributes that are stored in each of these tables in Figure 5. Eachstatement that is written must be unique to be placed in the database. This was done to ensurethat students were writing a new statement for each assignment to reflect on their learning. For1 We are keen to share this software with faculty interested in collaborating with us on writing papers andpursuing funded research opportunities
struggling to advance research programs with a only few graduate students,to collaborate in research activities in a mostly extracurricular and informal environment.Therefore, one of the main motivations for starting a VIP program in our school was to betterarticulate the extra curricular research work that some faculty were already undertaking withundergraduate students. This allows students, on one side, to be in contact with researchactivities in more formal and possibly more rewarding conditions. Faculty, on the other side, canget critical junior members for their groups to help advance their research agendas. Ourimmediate goals regarding our VIP program are: Begin achieving technical results, in the form of prototypes, software and