development of student’s STEM identity which isparticularly influential for underrepresented students in STEM [15], [17], [18], [32]. “Therecognition of oneself as a scientist” [16] or an emerging STEM professional, promotes students’sense of belonging and builds their STEM identity [16]. STEM identity development can bepromoted through student engagement in undergraduate research, as well as curricular and co-curricular learning experiences [15], [32]. Additionally, having opportunities to engage with andbe acknowledged as a member of the STEM community by faculty, peers, and other STEMagents, in both professional and social spaces, is important [15], [17], [18]. Student’s exposureand ability to engage with STEM role models, mentors, and culturally
asked respondents to indicate on a4-point Likert scale (1, “Not at all likely” to 4, “Very likely”) their likelihood of pursuing a positionafter obtaining their graduate degree. In particular, students were asked about their interest inpursuing a variety of careers including faculty positions: “How likely are you to pursue a positionas a university faculty member with an emphasis on teaching?” and “How likely are you to pursuea position as a university faculty member with an emphasis on research?” Other career trajectorieswere also assessed, including likelihood to pursue a position in industry, a start-up company,government, nonprofit organization, or a postdoctoral fellowship.Health: To evaluate mental and physical health, the surveys
Paper ID #44805Developing Moral Agency in Undergraduate Engineering Students: AnOngoing Exploration of Ethical-Epistemic Analysis PedagogyDr. Caitlin Grady, The George Washington University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Work in progress: an Approach to Integrating Ethical-Epistemic Analysisinto Engineering EducationCaitlin A. Grady Caitlin A. Grady is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering at George Washington University. She earned her Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineering and her M.S. in Agricultural and Biological Engineering from
. His research interests include graduate student mentorship, faculty development, mental health and well-being, teamwork and group dynamics, and the design of project-based learning classes.Dr. Karin Jensen, University of Michigan Karin Jensen, Ph.D. (she/her) is an assistant professor in biomedical engineering and engineering education research at the University of Michigan. Her research interests include mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work in Progress: Design and Preliminary Results of a Survey to Explore Relationships
international women of color. Darvishpour Ahandani is deeply committed to improving the well-being of underrepresented groups in STEM, a mission with which she personally identifies.Dr. Jennifer M Bekki, Arizona State University Jennifer M. Bekki is an Associate Professor in The Polytechnic School and the Associate Dean for Inclusive Excellence within The Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Her research aims to understand and address inequities arising from racism and sexism within STEM graduate education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Exploring the Landscape of Graduate Student Mental Health: Populations,Methods, and Terminologies - Who is Missing from the
Paper ID #41854The Effects of COVID-19 on the Development of Expertise, Decision-Making,and Engineering IntuitionMadeline Roth, Bucknell University Madeline (Maddi) Roth is an undergraduate student with majors in Neuroscience and Psychology and a minor in Education.Miss Joselyn Elisabeth Busato, Bucknell University Joselyn Busato is an undergraduate student at Bucknell University, majoring in creative writing and biology.Dr. Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University Dr. Elif Miskioglu is an early-career engineering education scholar and educator. She holds a B.S. ˘ in Chemical Engineering (with Genetics minor) from Iowa
theory and facilitating interdisciplinary graduate programs; the identity development and experiences of interdisciplinary engineering graduate students and faculty; and the decision-making processes and factors impacting implementation of interdisciplinary graduate education initiatives. She works as a graduate research assistant for the Virginia Tech Disaster Resilience and Risk Management interdisciplinary graduate program, as well as for the VT Center for Refugee, Migrant, and Displacement Studies.Dr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Marie C. Paretti is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center
examination. Following each coding session, reflections, emotions, impressions, andinterpretations were recorded in a memo document to note emerging trends. After thepreliminary coding, a second-pass axial coding was conducted on the Excel sheet to identifycommon themes related to the control/treatment group and the decision to stay/leave. Theseemergent codes were discussed with the second author to refine the claims made from the dataand for coding consensus.The authors of this paper have varied experiences with engineering and as members of thegroups we interviewed. The research team of faculty, postdoctoral scholars, graduate students,and undergraduate students included researchers from higher education and engineeringeducation. Three of the
bereavement within academia, particularly among graduate students and faculty,remains limited. Academics, especially women, already grapple with a myriad of demands, andgrief adds another layer of emotional, physical, and psychological challenges, disrupting work-life balance [11]. As grief in academia is multifaceted, there is a need for supportive andinclusive environments that acknowledge and address the diverse experiences of grief amongwomen in academia.Work-Life BalanceWork-life balance can be defined as the act of managing the responsibilities and roles that aperson assumes both in their workplace and personal life while being fully engaged in each roleand demonstrating an attitude of attentiveness and care [19], [20]. Work-life balance
Paper ID #44307Developing a Learning Innovation for an Undergraduate Mechanical EngineeringCourse through Faculty, Engineer, and Student CollaborationDr. Sean Lyle Gestson, University of Portland Sean Gestson graduated from the University of Portland (UP) in 2016 with a bachelor’s degree in civil engineering and received his M.S. and Ph.D. in civil engineering with a research emphasis in engineering education from Oregon State University (OSU). During his time at OSU, Sean taught multiple undergraduate engineering courses including, geotechnical engineering, highway design, surveying, and senior capstone design. His
belonging. We aim to interview 10 participants chosen at randomfrom Phase 1’s survey data. We are not targeting any specific students or experiences because wewant to know about all experiences, not just the exemplary, in order to understand variousaspects of first-generation students’ experiences in engineering technology. Participants will begiven $50 Amazon gift cards for their time.Qualitative data will be collected through semi-structured interviews, in person and virtuallyover Zoom. We anticipate that interviews will last about an hour, and participants will becompensated for their time with gift cards. The first half of the interviews will be used to buildrapport and gain an understanding of their backgrounds and decisions thus far for their
the training hours and mentorshipto support students in gaining internships and securing employment after graduation. Similarly,McHugh and colleagues [9] developed an on-campus internship model to increase computingstudents' employability preparedness from both the students’ and employers’ perspectives. Theauthors find that by understanding the expectations of employers and students, educators cantailor internship programs to better align with industry needs, thus enhancing students’ chancesof success in the job market. Furthermore, some studies highlight the significance of internshipsin improving computing students’ employability skills and career prospects [7], [8], [9]. Studentsalso better understand how to find and apply for internships
experience each of the four activity stations. Each station was a50-minute session, during which students had the opportunity to broaden their knowledge inengineering through practical applications of Industrial Engineering concepts, specifically inOperations Research and Human Factors Engineering. This learner-centric format ensured adynamic educational experience and kept the participants thoroughly engaged and excited aboutthe camp. Students were also able to freely interact with graduate students, faculty, and staffcoordinating the camp to ask questions and learn more about potential career paths inengineering.A. Station 1: Optimi-Station We initiated Station 1 with a high-level discussion about mathematics and optimizationby opening the
companies such as Ecopetrol, Texas Instruments, and Ericsson. His research interests focus on inclusive STEM learning and teaching methodologies for students with physical disabilities.Dr. Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University As an assistant professor of engineering education at Florida International University, Dr. Alexandra Coso Strong works and teaches at the intersection of engineering education, faculty development, and complex systems design. Alexandra completed her graduate degrees in Aerospace Engineering from Georgia Tech (PhD) and Systems Engineering from the University of Virginia (UVa). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Experiences of Students
scoping literature review and our own preliminary explorations of thedata collected from Reddit prior to formal analysis have left us with questions - specifically, ifstudents aren’t primarily using grades to inform and develop their learning, how are they usinggrades they’ve received as well as the anticipation of upcoming grades as they navigate theireducation? In what ways do grades motivate students’ decision-making?Expectancy Value TheoryExpectancy Value Theory (EVT) is a well-known framework that can be used to explain aperson’s motivation. The theory was an outcome of an exploration made by psychologists onachievement motivation; it emerged as researchers found that various theories of motivation areinterconnected, such that a
, developing an understanding of theunique dynamics and expectations of various global work environments, such as workplaceetiquette, cross-cultural teamwork, and understanding organizational structures in diversesettings.The internships abroad also emphasized the importance of connecting the internationalexperience to students' future academic, personal, and professional goals. The reflection essaysencouraged students to articulate and integrate their cross-cultural experiences into their broadereducational and career trajectories. This intentional linking of experiences fosters a moremeaningful and impactful learning journey.Further studies will be done to support this work by looking into faculty-led internship abroadprograms in other countries
interests, it cultivates a positivelearning atmosphere, promoting intrinsic motivation and a desire to excel academically [7]. Thesymbiotic relationship between student motivation and the faculty's ability to engage creates anenvironment conducive to meaningful and impactful learning experiences.Cultural Sensitivity: Students often bring a rich tapestry of artistic and personal beliefs to thelearning environment, shaping their perspectives and influencing their approach to education.Recognizing and understanding these diverse beliefs is crucial for faculty to foster an inclusivelearning environment. Cultural and personal backgrounds can significantly impact a student'slearning style, preferences, and expectations [8]. Faculty members who take the
were marked by a blend of learning,collaboration, and growth. Our experiences offer an illustration of this dynamic interplaybetween individual skill development and collaborative research endeavors. We relay insight intothe interconnectedness of personal growth and collaborative research endeavors, highlighting thetransformative potential inherent in graduate student involvement within research teams,depicted below:Deana"I first joined the research team during my first semester of graduate school, where I wouldpartake in meetings with Rebecca and a faculty member from the anthropology department, aswell as my mentor from engineering/technology. Rebecca and I started having our own meetingswhere she would teach me how to use different
professional development, group identity andbelonging, connections with faculty mentors, and academic success using a 25-question survey.The survey includes Likert scale questions, yes/no/unsure questions, and open-ended discussionquestions. While survey results show that students enjoy the lunches and believe the social andprofessional support activities are beneficial, the results are mixed on whether or not the lunchesplay a role in their decision to remain in an engineering major.IntroductionS-STEM, or Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, is a NationalScience Foundation program that seeks to increase the success of low-income, academicallytalented students. A university scholarship of up to $10,000 annually is awarded
DataOverall, the data show that, regardless of status (i.e., student or faculty), respondents who useChatGPT for academic or research purposes viewed it as more accurate and more useful thanthose who use ChatGPT for personal or career related purposes. The data also show that bothstudents and faculty are critical of ChatGPT’s ability to answer engineering questions,particularly as questions were more complex or open-ended.Designing Observation SessionsWhile a survey provides useful insights regarding preferences and behaviors, the authors of thisproceeding recognize that it is also important to make direct observations and measurementswith regards to information-seeking behavior and information literacy and not to assume allself-reported information
phase of an initiative to shift more power tograduate students through community engagement, ensuring that graduate students will have avoice within PROTEGE. The phases of the project include: 1) Gaining graduate studentperspective for structuring graduate student engagement in PROTEGE, and 2) Developing a planfor involving graduate student perspectives in PROTEGE moving forward. This work is beingled by a graduate student working in the collective, who has experience with doing equity workand wanted to find a mechanism to give graduate students a voice.With community engagement, by involving community members in the decision-making andoutcome-production process, they can feel more invested in the results of the work and feel asense of
students and faculty members with the tools to promote effective and inclusive learning environments and mentorship practices. Homero aspires to change discourses around broadening participation in engineering and promoting action to change. Homero has been recognized as a Diggs Teaching Scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence Fellow, a Global Perspectives Fellow, a Diversity Scholar, a Fulbright Scholar, a recipient of the NSF CAREER award, and was inducted into the Bouchet Honor Society. Homero serves as the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Chair for the Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (CDEI), the Program Chair for the ASEE Faculty Development Division, and the Vice Chair
perceptions are what will eventuallyinform a student’s decision on where to enroll, making sure that the students have as muchinformation as possible is paramount so that they can make an informed decision of theenvironment that will best suit them. Whether students were able to set foot on campus prior toenrolling or not and the accompanying pre-college experiences inform the degree to whichstudents feel like they belong on campus, setting the starting point for their collegiate career. Thepurpose of this qualitative investigation is to compare the anticipatory socialization experiencesof eight students and understand how the experiences differed between those who were able tomake it to campus prior to enrolling and those who were not, to better
2023 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceExploring the Critical Need for Interpersonal Skills in Engineering Students Stuart Bernstein University of Nebraska © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceAbstractInterpersonal Skills for Engineers (ENGR 100) is a course designed to provide all students in theCollege of Engineering (COE) an opportunity to learn the non-technical skills that will be criticalto them throughout their careers. For years, the college’s industry partners commented that ourstudents were highly proficient technically but lacked the personal skills that make a greatemployee
inhospitable to transitions and career paths that fall outside the dominant narrative ofthat story.This research explores the professional transitions experienced by an engineering facultymember across role types, discipline affiliations, and institution types. Though personal andfamilial transitions were also occurring, the scope of the research is major professionaltransitions initiated by an engineering faculty member (e.g., change in institution, change indepartment, change in role title or type), rather than those related to tenure and promotion,administration, and retirement. Existing studies of faculty transitions tend to focus on careerprogression for tenure-track faculty members, transitions into the academy, transitions into thediscipline of
personal connections they may notshare with a more senior mentor. Near-peer mentors are often perceived as more in tune with thestruggles of their mentees [1] and more approachable than an individual who identifies as an“expert” scientist [2]. Examples of near-peer mentoring relationships in academia include anupper-level student and a first-year student, an undergraduate student and a graduate student, or agraduate student and a new faculty member. Near-peer mentoring can positively affect both the mentor and the mentee. Studentmentees have stated that they feel more comfortable asking a near-peer mentor for academic helpthan they do a professor [3] and believe access to near-peer mentors promotes success in theircoursework [4]. Students
, alongside a significant proportion of assertive members who promoted teamcohesion and connection instead of personality conflicts. The team received an 87% rating forefficacy, with approximately 94% of team members attributing assertiveness-related qualities(confidence, decisiveness, and open communication) to the team’s success, as opposed topersonality conflicts and incompatibility. The implementation of the conceptual framework ofthis study will be beneficial when supervising other extensive STEM educational initiatives.AcknowledgementThis study is part of the work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant # 1915615,titled “Adapting an Experiment-centric Teaching Approach to Increase Student Achievementin Multiple STEM Disciplines.” It
forthe sake of the institution’s reputation, the desire to protect their most prolific and well-knownscientists, and the fear of being sued by the targets of bullying” 31 . Furthermore, the kind of negativerelationship between PhD student and advisor discussed in Narrative 3 can be a major contributingfactor to a students’ decision to either leave the PhD program or to complete the PhD programbut abandon a faculty career 32 . A 2018 Nature editiorial stated “[we] will never know how manypromising scientific careers around the world have been brought to a premature end because youngresearchers felt they could not continue to work under a bullying senior figure” 33 . Another author of this work had a very similar experience in their previous
engineers for professional endeavors.Students have numerous career choices available to them after graduation, and there is anopportunity to teach students how to navigate these options and make decisions that align withtheir professional and personal values and goals. This paper describes the implementation of anew course entitled Pathways to Impact offered at a large university that was created with theformal objective of exposing students to various professional pathway options and decision-making considerations. This course serves to enhance student confidence in understanding thedifferent ways in which they can make an impact throughout their careers, all while creating alearning experience that aims to strengthen students’ entrepreneurial
Paper ID #41898An Exploration of Game-Based Learning in Enhancing Engineering, Design,and Robotics Education via ”The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom”Prof. Ryan D. Sochol, University of Maryland Dr. Ryan D. Sochol is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering within the A. James Clark School of Engineering at the University of Maryland, College Park. Prof. Sochol is a Fischell Institute Fellow within the Robert E. Fischell Institute for Biomedical Devices and an Executive Committee Member of the Maryland Robotics Center, and also holds affiliate appointments in the Fischell Department of Bioengineering and the