and Objectives for a First Year Happiness and Wellbeing Course Muhammad Asghar 1,*, Daniel Kane 1, Angela Minichiello 1, and Wade Goodridge 1 1 Engineering Education Department, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA * Correspondence: m.asghar@usu.edu AbstractBackgroundStudents in higher education report a multitude of mental health problems. The situation seems to havebeen exacerbated by the Covid-19 Pandemic. In undergraduate engineering education in particular, anoverall stress culture prevails caused by high academic workload, sleep deprivation, higher self-expectations, and other factors that resulted in less time available for students to use directing their
community of practice around engineering education research.This work takes place at a private Tier 1 multi campus global research university that does notcurrently have a dedicated engineering education research program. The primary campus of theuniversity is in the northeastern United States, with multiple campuses located around thecountry, as well as internationally. This paper is situated in the area of communities of practice,and documents our efforts over the course of a year to plant the seeds for such a community togrow organically within our institution.Selected Literature ReviewTo support the development of a community of practice, we designed a set of engagementexperiences which could help to build stronger connections within our peer
it one of the most critical moments in a faculty’s career. Each individual willencounter specific challenges based on their held identities and institutional culture, but teachingis often a shared obstacle among them. One-on-one, 60-minute semi-structured interviews wereconducted with engineering faculty members who have less than two years of total teachingexperience as an instructor. The first stages of Campbell’s Hero’s Journey were used to facilitatethe dialog and provide a narrative structure to the interview. The participants were askedquestions related to three aspects of their teaching story: (1) the call to adventure, (2) challengeson the road, and (3) finding help. Preliminary findings indicate that early-career engineeringfaculty
in the Public Policy Center, and director of the Center for Research on Undergraduate Education at the University of Iowa. His research uses a social psychological lens to explore key issues in higher education, including student success, diversity and equity, admissions, rankings, and quantitative research methodology. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Systems Engineering Initiative for Student Success (SEISS) Framework for Transforming Organizational Designs Arunkumar Pennathur1*, Priyadarshini Pennathur1, Emily Blosser2, Nicholas Bowman3 1 Department of Industrial, Manufacturing and Systems Engineering, University of Texas at El Paso
the effectiveness of these pedagogies in promoting students’comprehension of engineering principals and interpersonal skills. It presents qualitative datafrom interviews and surveys, along with retention rate data. Overall, the goal is to provideawareness into this pedagogical approach to engineering education and contribute to ongoingdiscussions on approaches that promote holistic, transdisciplinary learning through emotionalengagement of students.BackgroundRetention rates for students enrolled in postsecondary engineering programs have shownfluctuations between forty to sixty percent over the past several decades [1]. According to astudy conducted by the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) in 2017, theretention rates for
Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP: Three Scaffolding Approaches to Foster a Tolerance for Ambiguity in an Undergraduate Engineering Statistics CourseSociety is becoming increasingly data driven. This is evidenced by the U.S. Bureau of LaborStatistics reports that indicate that the job outlook for occupations focused on data analysis isgrowing at an above-average rate [1]. This increased demand for a workforce with stronganalytical skills includes the engineering profession because of a corresponding growth in theamount of data surrounding the types of problems engineers are asked to address.Fourteen major challenges were outlined by the National Academy of Engineering in their area,that range from issues as pervasive
as campusesclosed and individuals were affected by stay-at-home orders. Many students on residentialcampuses were also forced to move back home during the middle of their academic year aspopulation-dense student dormitories were shut down to further minimize the risk of virustransmission. Against this chaotic backdrop, it is not surprising that data collected during theearly stages of the COVID pandemic show a surge in mental health issues among engineeringand pre-engineering students [1], [2]. By Fall 2021, however, with COVID-19 vaccines widelyavailable, many colleges reopened for in-person learning and students began adjusting to a new,post-COVID normal.As this process continues, and as universities continue to face ongoing waves of
course with respect to the abovemetrics as well as student retention and graduate placement.Introduction:Myriad undergraduate Biomedical Engineering programs have developed programs that seek toprovide an element of "clinical immersion" for students to learn about real-world problemswhich can be solved by engineering design [1-5]. However, given the diversity of such programsacross the country concerning resources available, such as proximity to a major medical school,teaching hospital, active residency programs, etc., it is challenging to derive a universal "one sizefits all" approach for such a course, as well as challenges in reporting their efficacy [6–8]. Theobjective of this WIP paper is to examine the efficacy of the clinical observations
attributed to individuals with a certain adaptabilityprofile being drawn to a career in academia. Accounting for adaptability when considering theextent to which WATPS are used can enable more individualized support for instructors duringperiods of change.I. IntroductionInstructors are challenged to implement and sustain a wide array of teaching practices andstrategies (WATPS) in undergraduate courses because WATPS have been shown to improvestudents’ conceptual understanding, appeal to a diverse set of students, and increase persistencein engineering, especially among underrepresented groups [1], [2], [3], [4]. The adoption of aWATPS can produce more workforce ready engineers that innovate in creative ways. Engineersgraduating from universities
perceptions of their own capacities; self-perceptions of STEM and engineering related strengths are predictive of persistence incoursework, participation in relevant co-curricular activities, and career exploration (Cabell,2021; Simon et al, 2015). Invention education includes a transdisciplinary range of pedagogical strategies that aredesigned to improve children’s inventive habits of mind as well as their awareness ofcommercialization related topics such as intellectual property and business model development(National Inventors Hall of Fame, 2019). Programs often teach invention processes such asidentifying problems, ideating, designing and testing prototype solutions, and sharing the ideawith others 1. Common formats for invention education
successful completion of these courses andadvancement in their majors.In this ongoing study, the researchers developed a two-prong approach to address the above andincrease student success. The approach involves 1) Creation of a specific set of modulesspecifically targeting the MAP prerequisite knowledge needed by the students to be successful inStatics and Dynamics courses and 2) Mentoring of "at-risk" students by student mentors (SMs)starting from the second week of the semester. The developed modules include pretests andtargeted interventions based on each student's knowledge needs. In addition, sets of videos,practice problems, and further assessments are provided to ensure that all students have the samebaseline knowledge and the tools to be
engineering computingcourse [1]. The revised course includes weekly readings followed by small-group discussions oncurriculum-aligned real-world justice topics. For example, students read an article onenvironmental racism that discussed how, contrary to popular belief, environmental pollutioncorrelates more strongly with race than with class. Discussion prompts drew students’ attentionto the data science implications: how what data is collected and how it is analyzed directlydetermines what conclusions can be drawn.This work-in-progress paper develops a case study analysis of post-course interviews of sixinternational students of color. We use a qualitative case study approach to analyze theseinterviews, focusing on students’ expressed identity and
motivated students to read andunderstand the ASTM standards disregarding the class size and topics.I. IntroductionUnderstanding engineering codes and standards are undoubtedly essential for success in anengineering career. Engineering curricula need adequate training to prepare students to remember,understand, and apply these professional standards. Based on the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy [1],Remembering, Understanding, and Applying are lower-order thinking skills that then help developcritical thinking skills. The laboratory course design strategy discussed in this paper is the secondquarter of a four-level senior mechanical engineering laboratory course developed to enhancestudents' higher-order thinking skills [2].Engineers are known to be hands
, regardless of their engineering concentration and lay theinitial work for future performance enhancements for the students, educators, and policymakersin the STEM areas.IntroductionBangladesh's engineering and technology sectors are expanding as the country's economydevelops. Despite the country's relatively low level of economic growth, its engineering studentshave achieved remarkable academic performance, becoming some of the world's most qualifiedengineers. Researchers have demonstrated that self-efficacy, or the positive attitudes individualshold about their skills to accomplish activities, influences how they operate in a particulardomain, such as mental health and others [1, 2]. Increasingly, research findings indicate thatpsychological and
Monitoring Industry-ClassroomProgram for Undergraduate Biomedical Engineering Students Dr. Alexis Ortiz-Rosario,1 and Ali Kaveh Rahimi21 Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus OH, USA; 2Ohio AtHome Health Care Agency, Columbus, OH, USA AbstractThe at-home remote monitoring sector of healthcare is a growing industry. This healthcaremarket is valued at $24 billion, and it is projected to reach $166 Billion by 2030 [1]. Thisgrowing industry has unique challenges and can promote unique learning opportunities forundergraduate biomedical engineering students [2]. A collaborative industry-classroomprogram was developed along with Ohio At Home Health Care Agency
, technology can be used to improve how educators teach [1] as well asenable new modalities of pedagogical techniques [2]. The successful implementation oftechnologies relies heavily on an instructor’s knowledge of the technology and ability tointegrate it into their class [3]. Researchers have studied the barriers and dynamics of technologyadoption by faculty members. Some of these barriers include perceived usefulness (or lackthereof), structural constraints (such as technical support), lack of time to learn new technologies,and varying levels of faculty proficiency with technology, among others [4].With such a wide variety of technological tools and approaches designed to improve the learningexperience available on the market today, it is
integrating engineering practices into the science curriculum [1]. Inaddition, in 2018, 46% of high schools reported offering at least one stand-alone engineeringcourse [2]. However, less than 20% of the teachers who are currently teaching these standaloneengineering courses have a major or minor in engineering or an engineering-related discipline,and the majority are not certified to teach engineering [3]. In addition, it was reported in 2018that only 3% of elementary teachers, 10% of middle school science teachers, and 13% of highschool science teachers had completed even a single course in engineering [2].Research has demonstrated that the perceptions that K-12 teachers hold about engineers andengineering are often inaccurate. When K-12 teachers
competence, in particular related to professionalism andcommunication. Student perceptions are detailed, and implications for engineering educationare discussed. IntroductionConnections between college degree completion and successful entry into the workforce is a goalfor educators and external stakeholders alike. Postsecondary leaders and federal and statepolicymakers have identified STEM fields as critical for economic competitiveness [1], [2],including ASEE’s efforts to advocate for key priorities in science and technology legislation [3].College officials are also focused on curricular and co-curricular efforts to ensure STEM studentsuccess. To this end, work-related experiential activities (WREAs) such
learning and robotics together withthe specific machine learning and robotics applications in autonomous systems, the first author hasexplored the Machine Learning Course and Robotics Course currently available in differentUniversities [1-7]. Especially, during her 8 weeks summer visiting at Stanford University, shealso had a chance to explore resources to integrate into the course. Based upon all these works, shesuccessfully adapted/developed course EGR 391- Intermediate Research Topic Course to aResearch-based Course on Machine Learning and Robotics by combining teaching, research,and engagement. This course is especially designed for the team of junior undergraduate studentswho are participating in the NSF EIR and NASA ULI projects.The
Time Engineering and technology ethical considerations Learning Sociotechnical impacts of cellular agriculture innovations Create claims and context from various media sources Goals Consider multiple solutions (NGSS K-2-ETS 1-2) Frame the problem (NGSS K-2-ETS 1-1) Weigh and choose criteria and constraints for their design (NGSS K-2- ETS1-2) Understand their client to meet their needs (NGSS K-2-ETS1-2) Communicate ideas and thinking to partners, groups, outside audiences (SL 1.1D, 2.1D, 1.4
, specifically: 1) the ways in which a brief ecological belonging intervention should becustomized for different course contexts; 2) the key mechanisms underpinning how theintervention supports proximal and distal student outcomes; and 3) the efficacy and mechanismsby which course onboarding strategies involving leadership messaging and community learningprocesses are successful across varied course, departmental, and university contexts intransforming each targeted course.In this paper, we focus on the third component and describe our process for building buy-in withleadership and faculty regarding this intervention. As a part of this process, we have gatheredsurvey information to understand instructor willingness to use this intervention in their
process improvements is a Digital Twin [1, 2]. Digital twin is a digitalrepresentation of a physical system, commonly in a form of a mathematical model thatrepresents dynamic behavior of a cyber-physical object. Digital twin provides severalcapabilities to engineers: (a) what-if analysis during design process, (b) predictive health-basedmaintenance, and (c) process control and adaptive scheduling. According to Grieves andVickers “While the terminology has changed over time, the basic concept of the Digital Twinmodel has remained fairly stable from its inception in 2002. It is based on the idea that adigital informational construct about a physical system could be created as an entity on itsown. This digital information would be a twin of the
evidence-basedpractices to achieve transformative, systemic and sustainable change that will increase thegrowth rate in the number of BIPOC and women obtaining undergraduate/graduate engineeringdegrees and establish a future growth rate that can substantially close the participation gaps. Theshare of engineering degrees awarded to women and/or those who are Black, Indigenous andPeople of Color (BIPOC) in the United States over the past decade reflects only slow progress inthe efforts to increase representation of these groups at the undergraduate and graduate levels.And for men who identify as Black, Indigenous, and/or People of Color, the percentage ofmaster’s and doctoral engineering degrees being awarded has actually declined in recent years[1
uncertainties. In this paper 6061 Aluminum (Al) and 1008 CarbonSteel (CS) were welded together using Resistance Spot Welding for two groups: one with aSilicon Carbide powder (SiC) added as a coating and one without the powder. Welding oftencauses metals to change in composition, which can lead to a decline in physical properties,including strength and corrosion resistance. Even more so when the welded pieces are dissimilarmetals. In this paper it was found that the corrosion resistance of the welded joint in acidicenvironments (1% HCl at 35, 45, and 55 Celsius) increased when the SiC powder was added. Itwas also found that the tensile strength of the welded joint increased in the samples that thepowder was used in. If Engineering students understand
plays a key role in addressing global inequity and injustice.Enabling engineers to address complex technological challenges like climate change requires thedevelopment of new skills such as evaluating justice dimensions of engineering andcollaborating with diverse communities [1].Conventional engineering education emphasizes technology-based attributes such as analyticalskill development, technical knowledge, and creative problem solving and leaves little time forstudents to deeply engage with the social implications of their work [2] [3]. However, in recentyears, there has been an increased effort to incorporate social justice into engineering education[4-9]. One method has been to encourage students to take social justice-based electives
control the rover remotely. The GUI program obtains the GPSlocation of the rover and displays the location of the rover on a map. For the control of the rover,ROS (Robot Operating System) was utilized. A Raspberry Pi 3B+ board is used as anintelligence unit of the system. The collected samples can be brought to a laboratory for furtheranalysis. In this paper, the details of the amphibious sampling rover and the educational lessonsvia this capstone project are presented.I. Introduction Mosquitos may lay eggs in shallow waters or wet areas near the shore of lakes, ponds, andrivers [1-3]. Although the exact location of where mosquitoes lay eggs depends on the mosquitospecies or the local environment available to the mosquitos, water is a necessity
increasing the gradingload on the instructor.IntroductionComputer Networks is a core undergraduate course in most curricula in the computingdisciplines. ACM curricula recommendations for computing list computer networks as anelement of computing knowledge 1 2 . It is typically taught as an introductory course to the field ofcomputer networks in the upper division. The course has been taught for decades and has grownto incorporate the advancements in the field, as evidenced by the textbooks published in thefield 3,4,5 . The textbooks and the experts in the field have an informal consensus on the courselearning outcomes.Grading is an essential tool to assess students’ achievement of course learning objectives.Point-based systems have been known to
- sity since 2011. His teaching and research interests focus on structural engineering, structural concrete, infrastructure, and educational reform. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Development of an assessment for measuring knowledge transferred between the classroom and structural engineering practice.IntroductionIt is well documented that humans are not adept at the process of transferring knowledge learnedin one setting to another in which the underlying principles are the same, but the outwardappearance is different from that in which the learning took place [1]-[7]. Knowledge transfer(“transfer”’) is something that is often assumed in
engineering, the use of role models has been touted as one way to increase the number ofgirls pursuing engineering majors and careers, e.g., [1]. However, based on findings from fourth-and fifth-grade girls participating in an engineering outreach program, we question whetheryouth in this age group are looking for engineering role models, and we challenge theassumption that youth take up an individual as a role model simply because a program attemptsto position them in this way. This has led us to question what role these “models” play in theminds and lives of youth, and we argue that it may differ from what we have believed. In thisstudy, we seek to answer the following: 1) Are elementary-aged girls looking for role models?;2) How do girls perceive
software and hardware tools, and theneed to ensure students apply sufficient engineering rigor in their analysis and design of projectsolutions.IntroductionProject-based learning (PBL) is an active pedagogy in which student learning is achievedthrough the completion of hands-on project work, and it has become an integral aspect ofengineering curricula worldwide. This trend is largely a response to a perception that engineeringstudents graduate with insufficient design experience, underdeveloped professional competenciessuch as communication skills and teamwork, and a poor understanding of the many societalcontexts in which engineers must operate [1]. PBL is viewed as a powerful tool for addressingthese needs, as project work is self-directed in