. Leal, A. Schleife, D. R. Trinkle, M. West, and G. L. Herman. Reforming an undergraduate materials science curriculum with computational modules. ” J Mater Educ, 38(3-4):161 – 174, 2016.[10] Xiao Zhang et al. Computational curriculum for matse undergraduates and the influence on senior classes. In 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[11] Cheng-Wei Lee et al. Impact of computational curricular reform on non-participating undergraduate courses: Student and faculty perspective. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[12] A. Stukowski. Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with ovito-the open visualization tool. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 18(1
,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 275–285,2012.[2] L. T. Schlemer, L. De Greef, and T. S. Harding, “Stories of change: Faculty inreflective dialogues,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2017-June, 2017, doi:10.18260/1-2--28850.[3] Garcia, G., N-unez A-M., and Sansone, V. (2019). Toward a Multidimensional ConceptualFramework for Understanding Servingness in Hispanic-Serving Institutions: A Synthesis of theResearch, Review of Educational Research, 89 (5), pp. 745–784[4] Minority Serving Institutions: Americas’ Underutilized Resource for Strengthening theSTEM Workforce (2019). The National Academies Press, Washington DC DOI:https://doi.org/10.17226/25257[5] Menezes,G., Won,D., Tufenkjian,M., Allen,E., Schiorring,E.(2017) Integrated
,” ASEE-SEConference, Daytona Beach, FL, March 3-5, 2018.A. Kaw, R. Clark, E. Delgado, and N. Abate, “Analyzing the Use of Adaptive Learning in a Flipped Classroom forPre-Class Learning,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, Vol. 27(3), pp. 663-678, 2019.A. Kaw, S. Garapati, “Development and Assessment of Digital Audiovisual YouTube Lectures for an EngineeringCourse in Numerical Methods,” ASEE Computers in Education Journal, Vol. 2 (2), pp. 89-97, 2011.A. Kaw, A. Yalcin, D. Nguyen, R. Pendyala, M. Hess, G. Lee-Thomas, G. Besterfield, J. Eison, C. Owens, “AHolistic View on History, Development, Assessment, and Future of an Open Courseware in NumericalMethods,” ASEE Computers in Education Journal, Vol. 3(4), pp. 57-71, 2012.A. Kaw, R
, vol. 116, no. 39, pp. 19251-19257, 2019.[6] Kern Family Foundation. "What is Entrepreneurial Mindset?" https://engineeringunleashed.com/mindset-matters.aspx (accessed 2020).[7] C. Naumann, "Entrepreneurial mindset: A synthetic literature review," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 149-172, 2017.[8] S. R. Brunhaver, J. M. Bekki, A. R. Carberry, J. S. London, and A. F. McKenna, "Development of the Engineering Student Entrepreneurial Mindset Assessment (ESEMA)," Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 7, no. 1, p. n1, 2018.[9] M. J. Mabey, S. S. Jordan, M. Lande, and S. Weiner, "A Comparison of Maker and Entrepreneurial Characteristics," presented at the ASEE Annual
arecourse-specific. They will be subject of future papers. References1. Blackboard eLearning: https://www.blackboard.com/2. Microsoft Stream: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/microsoft-stream3. Fadda, D. and Rios, O., 2019, “Online Computer Aided Design Class,” 126th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 15 - 19, 2019, Tampa, Florida, USA4. Fadda, D. and Vinay, R., 2019, “Teaching Computer Aided Design Online,” Proceedings of the ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, The University of Texas at Tyler, March 10-12, Tyler, Texas, USA.5. V. M. Ray and J. Tabas, "Developing Improved Methodology for Online Delivery of Coursework Providing a Framework for Quality Online
Paper ID #26737Critical Thinking in Manufacturing Engineering EducationDr. Arif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris University Arif Sirinterlikci is a University Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and the Depart- ment Head of Engineering at Robert Morris University. He holds BS and MS degrees, both in Mechanical Engineering from Istanbul Technical University in Turkey and his Ph.D. is in Industrial and Systems En- gineering from the Ohio State University. He has been actively involved in ASEE and SME organizations and conducted research in Rapid Prototyping and Reverse Engineering, Biomedical Device Design and
Conference[1] OpenAI, “GPT-4 Technical Report,” 2023, arXiv: 2303.08774.[2] J. Jumper, R. Evans, A. Pritzel, T. Green, M. Figurnov, O. Ronneberger, K. Tunyasuvunakool, R. Bates, A. Žídek, A. Potapenko, and A. Bridgland, “Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold,” Nature, vol. 596, no. 7873, pp. 583–589, Aug. 2021.[3] X. Gong, L. Zhao, R. Tang, Y. Guo, X. Liu, Y. Tang, J. He, W. Shi, X. Niu, X. Wang, and FY. Wang, “AI educational system for primary and secondary schools,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition., Jun. 2019.[4] A. ARIS, A. Uluagac, L.P. Rondon, D. Ortiz, M. Ross, and M. Finlayson, “Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Cybersecurity Curriculum: New Perspectives,” in
ASEE Board of Directors’ Advisory Committee on P-12 Engineering Education.Dr. Richard J. Freuler, Ohio State University Richard J. (Rick) Freuler is a Professor of Practice and the Director for the Fundamentals of Engineer- ing for Honors (FEH) Program in Ohio State’s Department of Engineering Education in the College of Engineering. He teaches the two-semester FEH engineering course sequence and is active in engineering education research. He is also affiliated with the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department and conducts scale model investigations of gas turbine installations for jet engine test cells and for marine and industrial applications of gas turbines at the Aerospace Research Center at Ohio State
,” Technical Services Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 257–268, jul 2018.[14] T. Boto and D. Herman, “Creating a curriculum-aligned OER discovery tool: A twist on faculty mini-grant incentives,” in Northeast Regional OER Summit, Amherst, MA, may 2019. [Online]. Available: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/neoer/2019/implementing/14[15] Open Textbook Network, “On-Campus Workshops: Engaging Faculty, Answering Questions,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://open.umn.edu/otn/workshops/[16] J. P. Moore and T. L. Reinsfelder, “Work In Progress: A Snapshot of OER Adoption in Engineering Mechanics Courses,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/31266[17] I. E. Allen and J. Seaman
their findings to their peersand a panel of judges using a rubric based on one used for regional science fair competitions. TheBioengineering 101 module has been performed four times from 2019-2023 at the same highschool; however, the design and implementation of the module significantly evolved due to studentfeedback, faculty observations, and the COVID-19 pandemic. The evolution of how the modulewas implemented included changes in the age of the students (first year vs. third year students),the duration of the modules (two weeks vs. four weeks), and how the chemical engineering facultymember was able to directly engage with the students (in-person, virtually, or asynchronously).Assessment of the program through pre- and post-surveys found
specialty areas of civil engineering so that students will have excellent exposure. Thispaper illustrates the method and process pursued in the capstone project courses in detail. Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX Copyright 2022, American Society for Engineering Education 2 Capstone Design Project in Civil EngineeringCivil Engineering projects during the final year as capstone design may vary in scope, objectives,breadth, and depth by several ways in different programs to fit requirements and needs. However, theperformance by
. Striker, and E. Swartz, “Federal Funding Opportunity Announcements as a Catalyst of Students’ Projects in MOOC Environments,” Milwaukee, WI, USA, Oct. 2019.[6] E. K. Van Beurden, A. M. Kia, A. Zask, U. Dietrich, and L. Rose, “Making sense in a complex landscape: how the Cynefin Framework from Complex Adaptive Systems Theory can inform health promotion practice,” Health Promotion International, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 73–83, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1093/heapro/dar089.[7] J. Karlin, L. James, R. Bates, E. Siverling, and J. Nelson, “The Missing Third: The Vital Role of Two-Year Colleges in Shrinking Engineering Education Deserts,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, Virtual On line, Jun. 2020
. Research results demonstrated thatthe flipped lesson improved the quality of students’ sources on mid-semester design proposal andless so on their final report. The lesson was fully implemented for fall semester 2017. Based ondata from the team’s first research project, and feedback from course faculty, the team piloted amid-semester reinforcement lesson in fall 2019. This second phase of the research project seeksto specifically reinforce students’ retention of concepts related to both the use of proper citationformatting and incorporation of more scholarly and authoritative sources in their team’s finalproject report. This work in progress paper discusses preliminary results from the fall 2019 pilot,specifically faculty perceptions of the lesson
University in College Station. A native of Columbus, Ohio, she attended North Carolina A&T State University where she received a B.S. in Bio Environmental Engineering in 2006. She then began pursuing her graduate education at Purdue University in the Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, completing her Ph.D. in 2015. Her primary research areas include 1) mycotoxin risk assessment and treatment in stored grains and 2) innovate instructional strategies for Biological and Agricultural Engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Connecting specific knowledge areas throughout core courses in Biological and Agricultural
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 20194/29/2019 ASEE Paper_2019_Final - Google Docs Examining how undergraduate engineering educators produce, reproduce, or challenge technocracy in pedagogical reasoning Abstract Sociologists and historians of science/engineering have documented the salience of meritocracy and technocracy in engineering and engineering education (Cech, 2014; Slaton, 2015; Riley, 2008). Some engineering education scholars have begun to document how technocracy and meritocracy have been mechanisms of marginalization within engineering education (Slaton, 2015; Foor
taxonomy on which our work in thispaper is based. We would also like to thank Dr. Chelsea Andrews at the Tufts Center forEngineering Education and Outreach (CEEO) who helped co-create the disability and designdiscussion exercise with Dr. Desen Ozkan, one of the authors of this paper. Additionally, wethank Dr. Ethan Danahy and Dr. Jenn Cross for implementing this discussion exercise in theirfirst-year engineering computation classes.ReferencesAmerican Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). (2016). Engineering by the Numbers: ASEE Retention and Time-to-Graduation Benchmarks for Undergraduate EngineeringAndrews, C., & Upadhya, R., K. (2019). Lessons from the Long Sixties for Organizing in Tech. Science for the People. 22(1). https
. She received her Ph.D. in ElectricalEngineering at Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO in 2009. Hertechnical interests include smart structure sensors and engineering education. She is a memberof IEEE and ASEE and active in IEEE-HKN. She was the 2011-2012 ASEE Midwest SectionChair. Contact: thswift@mst.edu.Steve E. WatkinsSteve E. Watkins is Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Missouri University ofScience and Technology, formerly the University of Missouri-Rolla. His technical interestsinclude smart sensor systems, optics, and engineering education. He is active in IEEE, IEEE-HKN, SPIE, and ASEE including service as the IEEE Education Society Vice-President ofEducational Activities and Award (2019-22
2021 ASEE Midwest Section Conference The Order of the Engineer: A Recognition of an Engineer’s Obligation to Society Judy L. Cezeaux College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Arkansas Tech University Board of Governors, Order of the EngineerAbstractThe Order of the Engineer is an organization whose express purpose is to promoteprofessionalism in engineering practice by instilling in its members an obligation to the ethicalpractice of engineering. This paper will describe the history of the Order of the Engineer, itsgovernance structure and membership requirements, and components
. M. Matusovich, J. R. Morelock, and D.-A. N. Hunter, “Beginning to Understand and Promote Engineering Students’ Metacognitive Development,” presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2016. Accessed: Mar. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/beginning-to-understand-and-promote-engineering- students-metacognitive-development[8] G. Scalone, A. J. Joya, K. E. Shroyer, and C. J. Atman, “Design Intentions: Engineering Students Looking Ahead to their Future Design Behavior,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Mar. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/design-intentions-engineering-students-looking-ahead-to-their-future
. “Extracting domain-specific words- a statistical approach”. In: Proceedings of the Australasian Language Technology Association Workshop 2009. 2009, pp. 94–98.[10] Hongye Liu et al. “A Digital Book Based Pedagogy to Improve Course Content Accessibility for Students with and without Disabilities in Engineering or other STEM courses (WIP)”. In: 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Minneapolis, MN: ASEE Conferences, Aug. 2022. URL: https://peer.asee.org/41438.[11] Chirantan Mahipal et al. ““What did I just miss?!” Presenting ClassTranscribe, an Automated Live-captioning and Text-searchable Lecture Video System, and Re- lated Pedagogical Best Practices”. In: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference. June 2019. DOI : 10.18260/1
established.So far, there has been support from organizational structures and changes in individual coursessupport existing learning outcomes.References[1] K. Haas, “Sankey Diagram Analysis: Undergraduate Program Updates 2017-2019,” 2020.[2] N. Desai and G. Stefanek, “A Literature Review of the Different Approaches That Have Been Implemented to Increase Retention in Engineering Programs Across the United States,” in ASEE Zone II Conference, 2017.[3] Georgia Institute of Technology, “Deliberate Innovation, Lifetime Education: Final Report of the Commission on Creating the Next in Education,” 2018.[4] K. D. Hall, D. G. Linzell, B. S. Minsker, J. F. Hajjar, and C. M. Saviz, “Civil Engineering Education Summit: Mapping
to the US Armed Forces in his 32-year military career. He was elected an ASEE Fellow in 2018. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Student-Led Study of Energy Flow and Storage in an Emergency MicrogridAbstractStudents investigate the feasibility of forming a microgrid in the downtown area of a larger cityin the Pacific Northwest. The objectives of this study are twofold: 1) Create a microgrid toprovide for prioritized urban loads and 2) prepare students who will likely design and installseveral microgrids in the region in the next few years. Generation is two hydroelectric units anda nearly equal amount of distributed photovoltaics. The grid is
Activities. IEEE Transactions on Education, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2021.3120210Gomez, J., & Svihla, V. (2018). Rurality as an Asset for Inclusive Teaching in Chemical Engineering. Chemical Engineering Education, 52(2), 99–106.Greene, M. M. L., Kellam, N., & Coley, B. C. (2019). Black Men in the Making: Engaging in makerspaces promotes agency and identity for Black males in engineering. 21.Holloway, E., & Radcliffe, D. F. (2018, June 23). Review of Global Trends in Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities (KSA) Frameworks Applicable to Ph.D. Programs in Engineering. 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. https://peer.asee.org/review-of-global-trends-in-knowledge-skills-and- abilities-ksa-frameworks
able to reduce or eliminatehuman interaction while yet processing large amounts of data [1]-[14]. AI offers computational Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2022, American Society for Engineering Education 1tools that replace the need for humans to perform certain repetitive tasks. The industries whichalready use AI include health care, retail, manufacturing, ad banking. The engineering students atGannon University are taught the set of courses whose content can be integrated into a course onapplied AI. The approach in the pilot course is at the level of subsystem and system design, withthe underlying theory simply summarized and treated as a black box
, D.J. Corbin, A.R. Nassar, (2019). ‘Effect of processing conditions on the microstructure, porosity, and mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V repair fabricated by directed energy deposition’, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, volume 264, pages 172-181, DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.08.041 Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Baylor University, Waco, TX Copyright © 2021, American Society for Engineering Education 11 11. Vickers Hardness Testing. (n.d.). Retrieved January 18, 2021, from https://www.struers.com/en/Knowledge/Hardness-testing/Vickers#application 12
M.S. in Management of Technology from Murray State University, and a Ph.D. in Interdisciplinary Engineering from the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Dr. Webster is a certified GD&T-Technologist, SOLIDWORKS Expert, and Six Sigma Green Belt. For his teaching and mentoring of students he has been awarded the 2021 ASEE ET National Teaching Award, 2021 Purdue Teaching for Tomorrow Fellowship, 2021 Purdue Teaching Academy Pandemic Teaching Award, 2019 ASEE EDGD Rising Educator Award, and 2019 SME Distinguished Faculty Advisor Award. Dr Webster’s research interests include ET outreach (e.g., recruitment and retention) and design education with focus areas in CAD, instructional techniques (e.g., project-based learning
). from https://interestingengineering.com/7-of-the-most-in-demand-engineering-jobs-for-2019.Moalloy, T. (2018). "9 Popular (and High Paying) Engineering Careers." from https://www.gijobs.com/9-popular-engineering-careers/.Nocera T.M., Delaine D.A., Ortiz-Rosario A., Shermadou A. (2018) Bridging the Gap between BME andIndustry: A Case Study, ASEE, Salt Lake City, UT.Ortiz-Rosario A., Shermadou A., Delaine D.A., Nocera T.M. (2019) To what extent does gender and ethnicityimpact engineering students’ career outcomes? An exploratory analysis comparing biomedical to three otherundergraduate engineering majors, ASEE, Tampa, FL.Torpey, E. (2018). "Engineers: Employment, pay, and outlook." fromhttps://www.bls.gov/careeroutlook/2018/article
virtual escape room model toother engineering disciplines, further investigating its versatility and effectiveness acrossdifferent educational contexts.AcknowledgementsThe authors acknowledge the 2024 ASEE Midwest section conference for providing us with theopportunity to implement the educational escape room. In addition, we would like toacknowledge the guidance and advice of Mr. Christian David Vargas Gutierrez on the usage ofMATLAB App Designer for the programming and design of the escape room virtualenvironment.References[1] P. Fotaris and T. Mastoras, "Escape rooms for learning: A systematic review," in Proceedings of the European Conference on Games Based Learning, 2019, pp. 235-243.[2] C. Kim, H. Na, N. Zhang, and C. Bai
LGBTQIA+ CommunityThroughout this paper, we reference the term “LGBTQIA+,” which is an umbrella acronym usedto describe any person who does not identify with heterosexual and cisgender norms (Gold,2019). Recent research on the LGBTQIA+ student experience shows a growing interest on thistopic, both within and outside of the field of engineering education (Lange et al., 2019). Withinthis encouraging trend, the disciplines that have placed the greatest sense of urgency onunderstanding this community’s experiences appear to have been higher education, psychology,and queer and gender studies. Research from these fields have shown that LGBTQIA+ studentsexperience heightened levels of verbal and physical violence, harassment, and discrimination. Asa
received for the best paper published in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008, 2011, and 2019 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS.Dr. Misty L. Loughry, Crummer Graduate School of Business at Rollins College Misty L. Loughry, Ph.D. is a Professor of Management in the Crummer Graduate School of Business at Rollins College. She studies peer control, peer evaluation, and teamwork. She earned her Ph.D. from University of Florida.Dr. David J Woehr, U. of North Carolina Charlotte David J. Woehr is currently Professor and Chair of the Department of