water resources area. In addition to engineering education, Nazli is also conducting research in stormwater management practices and agricultural drainage water management practices.Dr. Pavan Karra, Minnesota State University, Mankato Pavan Karra is Associate Professor at Trine University where he teaches in the field of Design and Con- trols. He can be reached at pavan.karra@mnsu.edu ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Effect of Terminology on Student Performance (Work-In-Progress)AbstractMany instructors know that understanding a few key phrases or terms can make a hugedifference in the outcome of students’ performance in exams. This is especially prominent forfirst
,marginalized, and/or hidden identities and core experiences in engineering classrooms. Yet,many faculty are not provided with practicable resources and training that can enrich theirknowledge, empathy, and understanding of students’ diverse and marginalized experiences thatdiffer from their own. This lack of resources has slowed the transformation of engineeringculture and provides an opportunity for practical impact by researchers and faculty developers.However, the topic of developing inclusive culture remains understudied and has evadedtraditional approaches to education research. Quantitative approaches can broadly identify thepresence of marginalization or inclusion, but they lack the nuance to enhance a reader’s inclusiveunderstanding. In
Engineering, to develop the mindset of Engineering for One Planet (EOP)in students. In this project, lectures were given to students on the nine core values of EOP,including Systems Thinking, Environmental Literacy, Social Responsibility, ResponsibleBusiness and Economy, Environmental Impact Measurement, Materials Choice, Design Mindsets,Critical Thinking, and Communication and Teamwork. After students were given the trainingmaterials on EOP Framework after the midterm, including handouts, videos and one lecture on thecore concepts of EOP, three students formed a team to provide a two-page proposal on the scopeof the project and the alignment of the proposed project with the nine core values of EOP. On thebasis of the instructor’s feedback, each team
students of color. Theyalso tend to have fewer resources than non-MSIs, but a more excellent representation of studentsof color who earn STEM degrees [37]. For STEM WOC faculty, this may translate intoincreased teaching and service loads in addition to demands to research productivity. Despitethese circumstances, WOC STEM faculty report an interest in serving in these institutionsbecause of their culturally affirming environments and the potential to impact students fromsimilar backgrounds (e.g., race/ethnicity, gender, lower income) [11], [4], [38]. Further, ourstudy considered these dynamics when investigating institutional structures that support WOCSTEM faculty at MSIs.MethodsThe current study is part of a more extensive national study
, "Gaining an Employment Edge: The Impact of Study Abroad on 21st Century Skills & CAreer Prospects in the United States," Institute of International Education, 2018.[4] T. M. Chowdhury, H. Murzi, K. D. M. Soto and A. Schuman, "Measuring the Impact of a Study Abroad Program on Engineering Students' Global Perspective," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2021.[5] J. M. Grandin and D. Hirleman, "Education Engineers as Global Citizens: A Call for Action/A Report of the National Summit Meeting on the Globalization of Engineering Education," Online Journal for Global engineering Education, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1-28, 2009.[6] A. Parksinson, "Engineering Study Abroad Programs: Formats, Challenges, Best Practices," Online Journal
Fernandez, B.J.M., “A Review of Problem-Based Learning Applied to Engineering”, International Journal on Advances in Education Research, ISSN: 2340-2504, vol.3, pp.14-31. (2016). Online Scholarly Journal Article[6] Ramesh, K., and Duncan, M., “Project based learning in an engineering design course developing mechanical engineering graduates for the world of work,”, Procedia. CIRP 91, pp. 565-570, (2020). Conference Proceedings[7] Subrata, R.,Karim, J.N., Berry, K.J., “Development of a Project-Based and Design Driven Thermodynamics Course”, American Society of Engineering Education, (2002). Conference Proceedings[8] Sivakumar, K., and Razi, M.N., “Project based learning in Introductory Thermodynamics”, American
educators learn. He currently serves as the Graduate Program Chair for the Engineering Education Systems and Design Ph.D. program. He is also the immediate past chair of the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN) and a deputy editor for the Journal of Engineering Education (JEE). Prior to joining ASU he was a graduate research assistant at the Tufts’ Center for Engineering Education and Outreach.Dr. Jennifer M. Bekki, Arizona State University Jennifer M. Bekki is an Associate Professor in The Polytechnic School within the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Her research aims to understand and address systemic inequities within STEM graduate education.Julianne L. Holloway, Arizona
-incomeSTEM graduates at the University of Houston. The overall objective of the program is toincrease the retention of low-income students by fostering their behavioral, academic, cognitive,and affective engagement. The central hypothesis for the project is that participation in a smallSTEM learning community designed to increase engagement on multiple dimensions willimprove student success outcomes for low-income students. Our hypothesis is based on datafrom existing programs on campus supporting underserved students. Best practices from thoseorganizations were incorporated into the program design for Endeavour.The research study associated with the Endeavour S-STEM Program has been designed toaddress three specific aims: 1. Specific Aim #1
insightWhen a team is evaluating design options, the objective is to select the best option tomaximize positive outcomes while minimizing negative consequences. A challenge for mostteams is recognizing the broad range of potential outcomes and consequences, and themagnitudes of those impacts. Questioning helps students discover things they missed. Evenonce the team members have identified the potential outcomes and consequences, they oftenstruggle to develop a consensus of what is “best”. In this case, asking questions helps theteam members discover the underlying values informing each student’s assessment of theimpacts.To motivate the skill, we shared the story of Citicorp Center (Morgenstern 1995): A questionfrom an architecture student prompted
scienceprograms and, ultimately, achievement of bachelor’s degrees (Wang, 2020). The need for financialsupport, resulting in most community college students needing to work while pursuing degrees, iscited as a major barrier for many community college students (Mendoza, 2009), particularly forthose who could benefit from full-time enrollment. Just-in-time academic support is one strategyfor improving student persistence in STEM, among many other researched best practices.Growth Sector, the backbone organization for the NSF Eddie Bernice Johnson INCLUDES Initiative’sSTEM Core Expansion Alliance (#1834628), along with partner institutions, has developed andimplemented the STEM Core at 30+ partner colleges in seven states, serving over 3,000 studentssince
Lotería, Art Education and Creative Resistance: A Funds of Knowledge Approach to Art Education in Working-Class Schools (Doctoral dissertation, The Claremont Graduate University).Garringer, M., Kupersmidt, J., Rhodes, J., Stelter, R., & Tai, T. (2015). Elements of effective practice for mentoring [TM]: Research-informed and practitioner-approved best practices for creating and sustaining impactful mentoring relationships and strong program services. MENTOR: National Mentoring Partnership.Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. teachers college press.Gelles, L., Youmans, K., & Villanueva, I. (2019). Hidden curriculum advocacy and resources for graduate
advance our efforts in sociotechnical integration with a form ofunderstanding and practice that best aligns with category 4 of the framework provided by Smithet al: with social and technical dimensions of a given phenomenon not only mutually shaped, butfully mutually constituted. What we came up with was a surprisingly discrete model of facultyprofessional development for our department, whose faculty identifies primarily as scholars in a)engineering and design education or b) the social sciences. This model extends from the team-teaching efforts described above but goes further to require instructional teams to define“integrated lessons” building upon each of their mutual disciplinary instructional traditions.Our proposed instructional
, Architectural Technology, and a Master’s in Facility Management. His field experience includes residential and light commercial construction. He has been an architectural designer as well as superintendent for single and multi-family residential construction projects. Mr. Ray worked as an engineering design manager in the Building Components Manufacturing Industry for over fifteen years.Dr. Brandon Sorge, Indiana University - Purdue University, Indianapolis Brandon Sorge is an Assistant Professor of STEM Education Research in the Department of Technology Leadership and Communication at the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at IUPUI. His research interests include all aspects of STEM education, espeDr. Katrenia Reed
, job shadowing programs still exist and have been documentedin the literature.In engineering, most job shadowing experience is in connection with industry. Job shadowingprograms have been found to have impacts on student career trajectories. Engineering programsare expected to help students find internships and job shadowing opportunities in industry becauseit is considered a best practice for students to have this experience early in their careers [3]. Whenpaired with a near-peer mentor and participating in a job shadowing experience, research showsthat there is a positive impact on student retention in STEM programs [4].Many different aspects can influence a successful job shadowing program. As in the definition,job shadowing should involve
, equity and inclusion (DEI). Simple exposure to adiverse environment in the classroom does not fully prepare students to succeed in a similar real-world environment.In order to best prepare students for post-graduation roles, we must incorporate DEI into ourcurriculum. Education in these issues promotes their awareness of the topic and allows them toexplore their own implicit bias in a safe environment. Practicing our teaching with similarthought, we must assess the student outcomes in a manner which is reflective of our ownunderstanding of these issues and aims to minimize performance gaps due to disparities betweenstudents.Systems Engineering is an ideal platform to promote student awareness of global inequities inthe world as well as explore
period [1].ABET, founded in 1932 by seven professional engineering societies under the name Engineers’Council for Professional Development, completed this reevaluation in response to pressure fromengineering educators who felt the pre-2000 criteria were restricting educational customization.Additionally, there was further tension between the poorly meshed engineering graduates’ skillsand industry needs [2, 3]. The new agreed-upon criteria saw a transition toward specific learningoutcomes and away from facility and resource possession. An example of this can be seen in the2022-2023 ABET accreditation policy 5(d) whereby an engineering department’s curriculum isrequired to include: (d) a culminating major engineering design experience that 1
graduate students is expected. Grades and comments will be given to each group so that suggestions can be acted upon for the final written report. 7. All participating students, High-school teachers, and faculty will complete a survey on their perceptions on the organization, structure, logistics, strengths, weaknesses, and suggestions for improvement of the exchange experience. These will be used to help document the impact of the course.It is anticipated that students will learn from each other through the multiple case studies, theresearch and presenting as peers. The plan is to consult with professionals from the Center forTeaching Excellence at HU and UVA to design case studies that are sufficiently broad to
,engineering students from GVSU would need to have completed their core 300-level coursework; consequently, the only semesters a student could take these courses are the Fall, Winter, orSummer of their last year. Unfortunately, our engineering students are on co-op in the Fall and insenior project in the Winter and Summer terms. One of them would need to be used to avoiddelaying graduation for a student who participated in it. Given the relationship between Proceedings of the 2023 ASEE North Central Section Conference 3 Copyright © 2023, American Society for Engineering Educationassessment of ABET outcomes and the senior design courses, the best option was to focus on theco-op semester.The co
thesame matter as changing our courses could be.Besides pressure from the government, another relevant impact was the recent experienceswith COVID-19. This pandemic was already mentioned in the introduction as a reason for thedelay in the curriculum update. Besides this, COVID-19 was also a great disruption for oursocieties. From the perspective of education, it was on the one hand a pressure cooker forinnovation (e.g. Adelowotan (2021), Adnan and Anwar (2020), Karma, Darma, and Santiana(2021), Van Wyk et al. (2020)). On the other hand, it also showed the fragility of oureducation system. Despite our best efforts, there are caveats in the development of thelearners attributable to the situation during COVID-19. Maybe not in knowledge
?hl=en&lr=&id=TtRMolAapBYC&oi=fnd&pg=PP9&dq=Strauss,+A.,+%26 © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference +Corbin,+J.+M.+(1997).+Grounded+theory+in+practice.+New+York:+Sage.&ots=DBcmeuoGVi&sig=00P FRA8GODT3vAhi7cX44jTMDCg[20] Y. C. Tie, M. Birks, K. F.-S. open medicine, and undefined 2019, ‘Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers’, journals.sagepub.com, vol. 7, pp. 1–8, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1177/2050312118822927.[21] W. Yaqub, O. Kakhidze, M. L. Brockman, N. Memon, and S. Patil, ‘Effects of Credibility Indicators on Social Media News Sharing
Foundation. The authors also acknowledge the Norm Asbjornson College ofEngineering’s Bryan Innovative Instructional Grant Program and the MSU Writing Center’sIntegrating Writing into STEM Grant Program for support. Special thanks to Writing CenterDirector Michelle Miley for meaningful discussions.References[1] C. D. Grant and B. R. Dickson, "Personal Skills in Chemical Engineering Graduates: The Development of Skills Within Degree Programmes to Meet the Needs of Employers," Education for Chemical Engineers, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 23-29, 2006.[2] M. C. Paretti, L. D. McNair, and J. A. Leydens, "Engineering Communication," in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge
Paper ID #38596Making Meaning through Mentorship: A Student-Led Layered Peer Men-torshipProgramMiriam Howland Cummings Ph.D., University of Colorado Denver Miriam Howland Cummings is a mixed methods social science researcher. She earned a BA from Rice University and recently completed a PhD from the University of Colorado Denver while serving as a graduate research assistant for the Urban STEM Collaboratory. Dr. Howland Cummings’ research focuses on engineering education, K-12 education, and the measurement of latent constructs.William Taylor SchupbachProf. Tom Altman Tom Altman received his B.S. degrees in Computer Science
community where students learned about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt served on the ASCE Body of Knowledge 3 committee and the Program Criteria Task Committee. Bielefeldt is a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include community engagement, sustainable engineering, so- cial responsibility, ethics, and diversity. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Future World Vision integrated into a First-Year Civil Engineering CourseAbstractCivil engineering (CE) has faced stagnant or declining enrollments in recent years, in contrast tomajors such as mechanical engineering that have been increasing
challenging the masculinist culture associated withengineering. And through this, we will simply produce more engineers. However, evidence for the first of these two propositions is not as unambiguous as wemight like. Two National Research Council (NRC) reviews offer “limited evidence for many ofthe benefits predicted or claimed for K-12 engineering education[8], and “not extensive”evidence for early engineering education impacting “achievement, disciplinary knowledge,problem-solving ability, and ability to make connections between [STEM] domains”[9].Similarly, a survey of over 20,000 Year 6 and 11 students in the UK found “that there iscurrently little detectable evidence of an impact of …engineering interventions on the
inall thirteen categories than their male counterparts and White workers. Another study looked atthe gains individuals from minoritized backgrounds made between 2010 to 2018 in degreeattainment overall then specifically in STEM. The findings indicated increased bachelor's,master's, professional doctorates, and research doctorates attainment in Black, Latinx, AsianAmerican, and others but still trailed their White counterparts [7]. Within each year and eachdegree designation, minorities were graduating in higher numbers than previously seen;however, those numbers remain below 30% combined for all Black, Latinx, Asian American,and other minoritized groups [8]. To better understand why those numbers remain low despiteefforts on behalf of colleges
engineering schools and industry: A strategic initiative,” in 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2018, pp. 1–6.[4] J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking, How people learn, vol. 11. Washington, DC: National academy press, 2000.[5] Hart Research Associates, “It takes more than a major: Employer priorities for college learning and student success,” 2013.[6] R. Korte, S. Sheppard, and W. Jordan, “A Qualitative Study Of The Early Work Experiences Of Recent Graduates In Engineering.,” in 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, 2008, pp. 13–94.[7] E. Goold, “Engineering students’ perceptions of their preparation for engineering practice,” in The 6th Research in Engineering Education
to report the skills or experiences that are mostimportant in their decision making to hire experienced employees. Respondents againemphasized “soft skills” like communication and teamwork, but also noted relevant experience,leadership or project management experience, and technical knowledge.DiscussionIn response to the survey results obtained from industry professionals, a number of curricularchanges were implemented. First, the fifth-year master's degree was restructured to include anindividual graduate project requirement once again. However, rather than strictly requiring thedevelopment of a novel research effort, students were also permitted to select a topic extendingfrom the interdisciplinary team design project. For example, a
Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Homero is the leader of the Engineering Competencies, Learning, and Inclusive Practices for Success (ECLIPS) Lab where he leads a team focused on doing research on contemporary, cultur- ally relevant, and inclusive pedagogical practices, emotions in engineering, competency development, and understanding the experiences of traditionally marginalized engineering students from an asset-based perspective. Homero’s goal is to develop engineering education practices that value the capital that tra- ditionally marginalized students, bring into the field, and to train graduate students and faculty members with the tool to promote effective and
Lawrence National Laboratory focusing on com- putational analysis for nonlinear seismic analysis of Department of Energy nuclear facilities and systems. After joining SFSU in 2016, she established an active research lab at SFSU with a diverse group of under- graduate and Master’s level students. For her engineering education research, she is interested in exploring how to use technology such as virtual reality and 3D printing to enhance student engagement. She is an active member of ASCE, ASEE, and SEAONC.Dr. Zhaoshuo Jiang, San Francisco State University Zhaoshuo Jiang graduated from the University of Connecticut with a Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineer- ing. Before joining San Francisco State University as an assistant
, some promising practices uncovered in this study are similar to best practices formilitary student support described within the literature. For example, Participant C’s institutionhas a military awareness class for undergraduates and a transition class to help nontraditionalstudents (especially veterans) transitions to higher ed. Both classes use military principles in tobenefit military and non-military students [24], [26]. Recognizing the important similarities inbenefits between these classes and other classes in research lends weight to the idea that sharingthese promising practices could be beneficial to increasing support for military students in thecontext of higher engineering education in the western United States.ConclusionLittle