the ASCE Body of KnowledgeIn 2008, ASCE released the second edition of the Body of Knowledge (BOK2) for CivilEngineersvii. Reflecting the Visions of ASCE and NAE, BOK2 requires that all Civil Engineersmaster sustainability: Page 13.1129.3 The 21st century civil engineer must demonstrate an ability to evaluate the sustainability of engineered systems and services, and of the natural resource base on which they depend; and to design accordingly.There are specific requirements for both academic undergraduate preparation, and for early-career development; these are summarized in Table 1.Clearly, the notion of Natural Resources pervades these
businessschool, so the only courses in the engineering curriculum related even remotely toentrepreneurship were a course in economic principles and a course in engineering economy.Accordingly, in 1948 a Department of Engineering Administration was established and a B.S. inEngineering Administration degree was offered as a second undergraduate degree for personsobtaining engineering degrees. This fifth-year degree covered accounting, finance, marketing,management, and industrial relations, but its focus was on career responsibilities for engineersworking in large firms, not on entrepreneurship.The Department of Engineering Administration grew into a business school in the 1950s, butMichigan Tech did not offer a single course with the word
thenotebook and Nikki dialogues to make them more noticeable by players), Geckoman underwenta second playtest, with another group of 7th and 8th grade students from the Explorationsprogram, a one-day program for selected Boston and Cambridge public middle schools,sponsored by the Harvard Medical School Office for Diversity and Community Partnership, theMinority Faculty Development Program/ K-12 Programs, the Biomedical Science Careers Page 13.638.9Program, and the Boston Science Partnership. As part of the Boston Science Partnership,Northeastern University and the University of Massachusetts Boston offer lab visits to studentsfrom selected schools
Bachelor's degree in Mechanical Engineering and concentration in Green Engineering. During his academic career, Garrett actively participated in numerous international initiatives at Virginia Tech and has maintained involvement in several projects since graduating.Odis Griffin, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Hayden Griffin is the Professor and Head of the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His research interests include the theories of human learning, especially in an engineering context, design of effective engineering courses and curricula, and design of graduate programs in engineering education.John Dooley, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
the course, with the possible inclusion of a mastery exam.29References1. P. Blowers, “A Course on Freshman Survival Skills,” Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2002).2. Christopher J. Rowe, Anita Mahadevan-Jansen, “Module-based Freshman Engineering Course Development” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2004).3. W. K. LeBold, H. Diefes, W. C. Oakes, “Helping First Year Students Make Critical Career Decisions,” Proceedings of the 1999 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (1999).4. B. Engerer, M. Hagenberger, and D. Tougaw, “Revision of a First
. degreeprogram in manufacturing engineering, and the other with students from non-technical majorsthat, for the most part, also took many of the same classes. The widely different backgroundknowledge and skills of studentsi, and their diverse career aspirations demanded an approach to Page 13.1412.2teaching materials and processes courses that was relevant to both groups. Both groups needed tobe exposed to content balanced between the applied and the theoretical (albeit with a greateremphasis on vocational component, consistent with the university’s historic strengths andapplied character. The exigencies of program accreditation, a high university
are equipped with the ability to think and solve problems. It is thedesire of most faculty that students think and solve problems on the global scale and that studentswill impact society for good. This desire is found in most program objectives, and BaylorUniversity is no different. Baylor’s Department of Mechanical Engineering has ProgramEducational Objectives for engineering graduates. The graduates should be able to: 1. Apply their knowledge of mathematics, basic science and engineering science to creatively ring a project from problem statement to final design. 2. Be professionally competent and engaged in life-long learning, serving God in a professional career or by continuing their education in a graduate
introductory IE course. Because lean thinking plays such a centralrole in many organizations today, we believed IE students should be given a holistic view of leanprinciples early in their academic careers. Another benefit is that management majors andengineers in other disciplines, who may take only one operations-focused course, can then alsohave exposure to these ideas.When companies embrace a lean philosophy, they generally train employees in lean principlesand associated tactics, often using classroom instruction supplemented with hands-on applica-tions, plant floor exercises, and live simulations. We adopted one of these simulations at Site 1,called Time WiseTM and developed by Time Wise Management Systems for use in corporatetraining (http
for the course sequencesThe methodology is inspired by the use of project management tools from operations research.The main hypothesis is that a degree plan can be visualized as a complex project and it requirestwo phases, planning and execution.The major tasks in a project are equivalent to the courses in the curriculum. Therefore, eachstudent has to administer his own “Educational Career” project with the limited number of credithours that the student can allocate to school. The traditional layout of courses assumes that astudent has completed a course at a satisfactory level before moving into the next, as shown inFigure 2. We want to expand the concept of academic threads 2-4 by linking course dependencies.Instead of considering that
. However, automated manufacturing system integration is acomplex cognitive skill that typically takes years to master. To better prepare engineers andmanufacturers to compete in a rapidly changing world, needed is a better understanding of thenature of system integration skill and how to acquire it.This study reports preliminary observations from a verbal protocol analysis study of expert andnovice system integration engineers. Subjects included four application engineers from anengineering services firm (all with 15 or more years of system integration experience) and twoearly career engineers with four or fewer years of experience. All were asked to design anautomated cell phone assembly line given a set of seven parts, a $1M budget, a six-second
completed), 2 (Strong team member, got own work done and helped others when requested), 1(Completed own work only), 0 (Not a team player, seldom showed up to scheduled meetings, unprepared, or brought a negative attitude to team)Students are instructed that they will encounter this peer review process in their careers, so that itis important that they learn how to provide feedback professionally and diplomatically, and alsoto receive and learn from feedback. Each student receives copies of all evaluations about them,with the name of the evaluator kept private. These evaluations help strong team members feelappreciated for their efforts, and give weaker members an opportunity to improve theirperformance. Teaching staff review all peer
teamwork environment, these high achievers feel that the poorer studentswaste their time. Also, the less talented students can be encouraged to participate strongly in theproject, thus eliminating a significant number of “passengers”.1. Introduction“We need to work to support ourselves and we want a life, therefore time for study is scarce”depicts the typical full-time student characteristics in ACU, Australia. Part-time students, withages varying between 25 and 50, have one or more of the following responsibilities: • a demanding job; • family; and • the need to improve their career potential.The scarcity of time for study is witnessed by the aforementioned student characterization and assuch, it is desirable to design courses which
Level Students”17 is aimed to assess the effectiveness of aunit of instruction in teaching core engineering concepts to secondary level technology educationstudents. It used an experimental research design based on mixed methods with a pre –and posttest for all participants and focus groups with randomly selected participants. The targetpopulation was 114 students. The second, titled “African American High School Student’sPerceptions of Engineering and Technology Education”18, seeked to investigate the perceptionsof African American high school students toward engineering and technology education as aprofession and career choice. The research design was descriptive and qualitative; it involvedinterviews to seven students. No theoretical
AC 2008-940: INSTRUCTIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF ATASK-ORIENTED SENIOR LEVEL DATA ACQUISITION PROJECT IN ASIMULATED BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTCarl Spezia, Southern Illinois University-Carbondale Carl J. Spezia is an Assistant Professor in the Electrical Engineering Technology Program located in the Department of Technology at Southern Illinois University Carbondale (SIUC). He joined the program in1998 as a Visiting Assistant Professor. He worked as a power systems engineer for electric utilities for eight years prior to seeking a career in higher education. He is a licensed professional engineer in Illinois. His industrial assignments included power system modeling, power systems protection
theNational Science Foundation or Wright State University.8.0 Program Information More information on the WSU model for engineering mathematics education (includingall course materials for EGR 101) can be found on the program website: http://www.engineering.wright.edu/cecs/engmath/9.0 References1. Gabriele, G, 2005, “Future of NSF Engineering Education Programs,” NSF Engineering and Computing Education Grantee Meeting, Washington, DC, February 2005.2. Adelman, Clifford, 1998, "Women and Men of the Engineering Path: A Model for Analyses of Undergraduate Careers," U.S. Department of Education Report, May, 1998. Page
theremainder of the curriculum. Graduation rates increased more significantly for femalestudents, and for most MBTI designations, by 4-letter type, 2-letter temperament, orsingle letter preference.Use of the MBTI in Engineering EducationThere is a substantial history of the use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator inengineering education. This test, which classifies people into psychological subgroupsand is based on the theories of Carl Jung, is very popular for career counseling, workteam formation, and personal development. The summary of its use in engineeringeducation below is taken largely from our 2002 paper1. Another effective summary isgiven by Felder4. For the reader uninitiated with basic Myers-Briggs terminology anduse, a primer is attached
DelineatorTM 3, was created to benchmark the effectiveness of thesimulations and to facilitate their continuous improvement. Results indicate that students likedusing the simulations and considered them to be enjoyable learning supplements. Students alsofelt that the simulations improved their confidence to take future engineering courses and werewilling to use more simulations in their academic careers. There was no significant correlationbetween dominant learning styles of the students and their perceptions of the simulations.Therefore, adaptations based upon learning styles may not be needed for effective use ofsimulations in learning environments similar to ENGR 110.IntroductionMost Freshman engineering students at our University take Precalculus
course at Georgia Tech, there arebroader questions about what topics should be taught in the class and the proper sequencing ofthose topics. The calculus-based introductory physics course at most U.S. universities hastypically followed the same sequence of the same topics for many decades. The traditionalphysics course is focused entirely on classical, pre-20th century physics, addresses onlymacroscopic systems, and deals only with problems that can be solved analytically. One canquestion whether the traditional content and pedagogy of introductory physics is meeting theneeds of modern science and engineering students, many of whom will pursue careers that arebecoming more dependent on understanding matter at the microscopic level
kinesthetic active supplemental learning opportunities for this project. Glen’s educational research interests include student learning styles and the statistical evaluation of assessment instruments. He has received an NSF CAREER award, and served as the 2006 Fellow at the National Effective Teaching Institute.Phillip Cornwell, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Phil Cornwell is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; he developed and taught the classroom problem-solving supplemental learning opportunities for this project and has been instrumental in establishing the Rose-Hulman Center for the Practice and Scholarship of Education. Phil’s
and local education and certification programs. This organization promotes lifelong learning through a fast growing network of 140 partners providing education services and thousands of academic institutions. Prior to joining Dassault Systemes, he was working for the French embassy in Vienna -Austria to promote scientific and technological co-operations between various Austrian and French education and research institutions. He started his career at Dassault Systemes in 1990 as Sales Area Manager Germany -then Europe. In a next position as Senior Consultant for Dassault Systemes’ Automotive Competency Center, Xavier led co-operation projects with several car
analyzing changing rates of an exponential function,interpret slope in a meaningful context, and use a mathematical model to make reasonablepredictions. They then use this understanding to inform their engineering designs to meet thecriteria and constraints of the challenge.Algebra and EngineeringThere is widespread consensus that algebra is important as a “gatekeeper” to higher levels ofmath and careers in science, technology, math, and engineering fields (Moses, 19931; Pelavin &Kane, 19882). Also, prominent organizations such as the National Academy of Engineers and theInternational Technology Education Association have been calling attention to the need toincrease technological literacy for all people, even those who may not enter or are not
UltraSource Inc. After receiving her BS degree at Daniel Webster, she intends to pursue a career in commercial space exploration. Email: crowder_sonja@dwc.eduChristopher McInnis, Daniel Webster College Christopher M. McInnis is a senior at Daniel Webster College enrolled in Aeronautical Engineering, pursuing a Bachelors Degree. He has worked at SigArms as a design engineer, and currently works at UltraSource Inc. in their design department. He would like to continue his design work, following graduation. Email: mcinnis_christoper@dwc.eduStavros Yanakis, Daniel Webster College Stavros C Yanakis is a sophomore at Daniel Webster College enrolled in Mechanical Engineering, pursuing a
service-learning projects enrichtheir education by enhancing their engineering skill sets; developing new problem-solvingtechniques; and strengthening leadership abilities as well as teamwork skills. This researchfurther hypothesizes that service-learning participants experience personal growth over thecourse of the project; rather than looking for what a career in engineering can do for them,students glimpse their potential global and societal impact as engineers. By integrating the Page 13.1021.2theories of cognitive psychologists, this paper aims to elucidate on why and how the students onthe EWB Ecuador Project were able to learn and develop
. The class also forces the students to work as a team on something that they could nothave possibly done alone at this stage in their career with the timeframe provided. The studentsare not only forced to propose complex modeling solutions to difficult supply chain problems;they are responsible for implementing the solutions that they propose. Throughout the semester,there is extensive interaction about the pros and cons of proposed solutions, whether or not thosesolutions will be efficient, and whether or not those solutions will be meaningful to a potentialuser of the system. Because these are the types of decisions that the students will be making intheir future work, the class prepares students to address those issues
lower than MATH 111 Î College Algebra, such as MATH 100 Î Intermediate Algebra,then those studepvu"ctg"encuukhkgf"cu"Ðrtg-gpikpggtkpiÑ"uvwfgpvu"cv"USI until they can take MATH118 Î College Algebra & Trigonometry.ENGR 101 Î Engineering Orientation Î is a seminar class that all first year engineering studentsare required to take, whether they are in the 4-year program, 5-year program, or pre-engineeringprogram. In this way all first year students intent on pursuing engineering get some exposure tothe study and careers in engineering. Reference 4 describes the details on the ENGR 101 ÎEngineering Orientation course. This course is in the process of being updated, includingchanging from 0 credits to 1 credit to encourage more student
project can be used as an effective educational Page 13.1103.23tool to further enhance the students understanding of the subject matter. The student canconveniently alter the problem input and analyze and interpret the obtained results. Theeffectiveness of this project can be evaluated by tracking the academic success of the students intheir future studies and professional careers. The proposed methodology enhances the interest ofstudents in performing research, and encourages them to possibly pursue graduate studies.Bibliography1. Navaee, S., Das, N.K., “Utilization of MATLAB in Structural Analysis,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual
within each. In thenot-so-distant past, almost all of the aerospace engineering students would graduate with nearlyidentical transcripts except for the behavioral and human sciences courses. Now it is notuncommon for students to choose a path leading to various specializations of study, certificatesof specialization, or to take steps toward professional registration while relatively early in theiracademic careers. Although individual advisors can assist in charting a curricular path toward adegree or certificate programs such as leadership and material certificates within the engineeringcollege, the larger picture and a measured exposure to the various paths available must beprovided to each student. Only if the student chooses the appropriate
AC 2008-2278: COLLABORATIVE PRODUCT DESIGN AND REALIZATION INMECHANICAL ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY CURRICULAVukica Jovanovic, Purdue University, West Lafayette Vukica Jovanovic began her academic career in 2001 when she graduated at University of Novi Sad, majoring in Industrial Engineering and Management, Minor in Mechatronics, Robotics and Automation. She was working as Graduate Research and Teaching assistant and lectured various courses at departments of Industrial Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Mechatronics from 2001 until 2006. She was an active member European organizing committee of student robotic contest Eurobot and chief of Eurobot organizing committee of Serbian student
goal of becoming USArmy officers is not in question. They are driven to do well in their classes because theiracademic standing accounts for 65% of their order of merit (OML) within their graduating class.This OML determines the branch or specialty that they can select, their post selection, and it willdetermine promotion dates later in their careers. Cadets understand this importance and as aresult, they try very diligently to succeed.As Yearlings, (sophomores), they choose their majors. Students that choose an engineeringmajor will take CE300 Fundamentals of Engineering Mechanics and Design, and CE364Mechanics of Materials. Students that do not choose an engineering major must choose anengineering sequence or track of three engineering
careers or being skilled practitioners. Theyare much longer range attributes a graduate accomplishes. One pitfall programs can face is thattheir objectives can many times be too closely related to what is expected of students at the timeof graduation. Objectives should describe what is attained the first several years aftergraduation.On the other hand, program outcomes are specific measurable qualities students must know or beable to do by the time of graduation. While they are normally measured as a student progressesthrough the program, the program must show they have been achieved by the time the studentgraduates. Programs will often times confuse the terms of program outcomes and courseoutcomes or objectives.Courses within the program have