, mostcommonly associated with the advisory board composition and their involvement in the reviewof the PEOs, SOs and curriculum. This reinforces the importance of the advisory boardcomposition choices as well as the activities of the group.Common findings associated with Students, Criterion 1, were related to both student advisingand pre-requisite enforcement. Accrediting bodies generally do not stipulate the specificcharacteristics of student advising. However, advising must occur in order to monitor studentperformance and progress toward degree attainment. In addition, advising must include bothacademic and career matters. Debate often centers on the use of professional advisors incomparison with faculty member advisement. No right answer is clear
Education, 2020 Evaluating the Impact of Training on Increasing Cross-Culture CompetencyIntroduction:Technological, political and economic changes worldwide have driven an increase inglobalization [1] and many industries that operate globally need to hire engineers that will besuccessful in that arena. Assigning the most technically competent engineer to a project withoutconsidering their global competency can be very costly for organizations. If these engineers fail,wasted travel and living expenses, lost contracts, and personal costs could be significant [2].Therefore, many employers state that cross-cultural competency is important for career developand actively recruit that skill set [3].For some time now, industry and academia have tried to
capstone programs may enhance student learning and engagement. For students, industry partnerships in capstone are seen as providing an intersection ofstudents’ academic learning and their future careers in industry. Our institution supportssponsored projects that can prepare students to approach open-ended problems, improve designand communication skills, incorporate stakeholder needs, and work effectively on teams. Theconnections they build with industry partners can also be the beginning of a professionalnetwork. Furthermore, experience working on a real-life project can help students identify orclarify their career path within engineering. For engineering programs, these industry partners can serve as a resource to benefit
thegrade and course requirements. Another 6 students met the grade requirements but did notattempt one of the five required classes. Of the Switchers that met all the requirements, they weredisproportionately female (n=16), that is ~76% of the group. Almost all of the Switchers that metall of the requirements, switched into another major that was STM, except for a couple thatswitched into another engineering major. Speculating, it is possible that some of the highachieving students are leaving for another typical pre-med major, which may be perceived as“easier” than BME. They may also be leaving due to attitudes about perceived career prospectsof BME majors relative to other STEM majors, documented by others [10], [11]. Clearly, thereis a
a way that, unlike other windmills, it rotates around a ring frame, leaving the central portion open for other uses. This enables VayuWind to extract wind power using existing structures such as commercial buildings and skywalks with minimal noise pollution. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Project-based smart systems module for early-stage mechanical engineering studentsAbstractSystems thinking is a key ingredient for an engineering career. In this paper, we present details ofa project-based systems thinking module for an early-stage mechanical engineering course. In thismodule, students learn systems engineering concepts through a series of
that allowstudents to build on what they bring.”(4) Working with educators. In our paper, “Designing and enacting weekly micro-reflections as ameans of professional development of early-career educators: Voices from the field,” (Turns et.al, 2019) we focused on educator design and enactment of reflection activities of 3-5 minutes(micro-reflection activities). As articulated in the paper, “we asked: under what circumstancesand in what ways can engagement in micro-reflection activities during one’s teaching contributeto advancing one’s teaching?” In the project, three educators with different levels of teachingexpertise engaged in adding micro-reflection activities to weekly 2-hour classroom sessions. Thiseffort gave us an opportunity to
program are listed. Items (a) though (h) are more or less similarto Electronics Engineering Technology (EET) program and there is no need to cover them here.However, items (j) and (k) will be explained in detail. 2Courses in REET program include:(a)- COMMUNICATION SKILLS(b)- HUMANITIES, SOCIAL SCIENCES©- MATHEMATICS AND NATURAL SCIENCES(d)- PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT(e)-TECH CORE COURSES(f)- AUTOMATION AND ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS(g)- INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND PROGRAMMING(h)- APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT(i)- TECHNOLOGY CAREER PREPARATION(j)- SENIOR PROJECT(k)-SPECIALIZED COURSESIn the following, specialized courses in REET program will be addressed.REET 100 Alternative Energy Technologies with LabThis
further expand his data analytics and vi- sualization skills. Education and healthcare are the two main career focus interests for Utkuhan and he wishes to use data-driven optimization solutions to improve the lives of others.Prof. Lynn A. Bryan, Purdue University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #30195Lynn A. Bryan is a Professor and Director of the Center for Advancing the Teaching and Learning ofSTEM (CATALYST) at Purdue University. She holds a joint appointment in the Department of Curricu-lum and Instruction and the Department of Physics and Astronomy. She received her B.S. in Chemistryfrom
applications in target tracking and physical layer communications. Her work on target detection and tracking is funded by the Office of Naval Research. Dr. Nelson is a 2010 recipient of the NSF CAREER Award. She is a member of Phi Beta Kappa, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, and the IEEE Signal Processing, Communications, and Education Societies.Dr. Margret Hjalmarson, George Mason University Margret Hjalmarson is a Professor in the School of Education at George Mason University. Her research interests include engineering education, mathematics education, faculty development and mathematics teacher leadership.Prof. Anastasia P Samaras, George Mason University ANASTASIA P. SAMARAS is Professor of Education in the College of
understand that the exposure to power tools, 3-d modeling, circuits, coding, and human-centered needs will be beneficial in the long run to my education and career.”Hands-On Nature of the Course: Students who found that the hands-on nature of the course asthe most interesting differentiated the course from “traditional courses,” e.g. lecture-basedcourses, included the opportunity to build prototypes, and learning and applying skills related tomodeling, building, programming, and circuitry. This category is most closely related to learninggoals, 3) Promote a culture of making by introducing solid modeling, programming, sensors,data acquisition, 3D printing, and other maker tools, and 4) Build teamwork and cooperativelearning skills through
Paper ID #29382Student Confidence and Metacognitive Reflection with Correlations toExam Performance in a FE Review Course in Chemical EngineeringSheima J. Khatib, Texas Tech University Sheima J. Khatib is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Texas Tech University. She received her Ph.D. in Chemistry in the area of heterogeneous catalysis from the Au- tonomous University of Madrid. Apart from her interests in chemical engineering and finding sustainable paths for production of fuels and chemicals (for we she has received several grants including the NSF CAREER award), she is passionate
existingguidance available to practitioners focuses on planning and execution utilizing a sustainabilityframework such as the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) by the U.S. GreenBuilding Council (USGBC). As the demand for sustainability is increasing, universities areoffering courses about construction sustainability to educate future professionals and providehands-on experience to prepare them for their careers. In response to this trend, the USGBCdeveloped a module called LEED Lab, and encouraged its adoption for university constructionsustainability courses. The LEED Lab is used by students to evaluate the existing on-campusbuildings’ sustainability performances. Their evaluation is reviewed by experts for a final LEEDcertification
(Taxol) through the use of plant cell cultures from the Taxus Yew Tree. Throughout her time at Rowan and UMass, she developed a passion for undergraduate education. This passion led her to pursue a career as a lecturer, where she could focus on training undergraduate chemical engineering students. She has been teaching at UK since 2015 and has taught Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics, Computational Tools and the Unit Operations Laboratory. She is especially interested in teaching scientific communication and integration of process safety into the chemical engineering curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Student Performance in an Online Chemical Engineering
device. However, the professional culture maycreate competing forces like cost and career progress. Gentile articulates that students must betrained in how to communicate ethical concerns to superiors, and the skill must then bepracticed. This module was designed to do both of these things for engineering students.The module developed had several learning objectives: 1. Develop an action plan to modify or address an ethics or character issue 2. Explore multiple solution paths 3. Identify the needs and motivations of various stakeholdersThe research goal of the project was to determine if a structured module in an engineering coursecould help students enhance the skill of building an action plan for ethics. The skill is importantfor
2017 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conferencewould be updated in the WEAVEonline system. The mission statement for ESET is given asfollows. This statement is posted on the ESET website and used in ABET accreditation.Mission / PurposeThe Electronic Systems Engineering Technology (ESET) program prepares graduates forimmediate impact and long-term career success by providing a real-world experiential educationcoupled with personalized undergraduate experiences in electronics product development, test,system integration, and engineering research.The goals are more specific than the mission statement and are chosen to ensure the missionstatement can be achieved. The ESET goals, four in total, are listed as follows.GoalsG0: Immediately
statements only in an objective and truthful manner. 4. Engineers shall act in professional matters for each employer or client as faithful agents or trustees, and shall avoid conflicts of interest. 5. Engineers shall build their professional reputation on the merit of their services and shall not compete unfairly with others. 6. Engineers shall act in such a manner as to uphold and enhance the honor, integrity, and dignity of the profession. 7. Engineers shall continue their professional development throughout their careers and shall provide opportunities for the professional development of those engineers under their supervision. Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference
hands-on aspects of engineering. Our challenge as engineering educators is toreach these students in order to prepare them for their future careers as engineers in society.Students will likely encounter many different teaching styles during their academic careers, andthis variety generally adds to their overall educational experience. However, if given a choice,most students would select instructors that use an interactive teaching style. Pomales-Garcia andLiu (2007) found, in a survey of 47 University of Michigan undergraduate engineering students(30 males, 17 females), that students most preferred interactive teaching that included examples,demonstrations, stories, websites, visual displays, group work, competitions and oralpresentations
health and wellness, engineering stu- dent career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research. She was awarded a CAREER award from the National Science Foundation for her research on undergraduate mental health in engineering programs. Before joining UIUC she completed a post-doctoral fellowship at Sanofi Oncology in Cambridge, MA. She earned a bachelor’s degree in biological engineering from Cornell University and a Ph.D. in biomedical engineering from the University of Virginia.Karle Flanagan, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Karle Flanagan is a Senior Instructor of Statistics at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She has taught introductory statistics
is a professor in the Department of Mechanical and Materials Technology at the Instituto Federal de Educac¸a˜ o, Ciˆencia e Tecnologia da Bahia. He is a mechanical engineer and holds Master’s degree in mechanical engineering, and a PhD in Engineering Education. He has been teaching at different levels, from the first year of technical high school to the final year of mechatronic engineering course, since 1995. He also has considerable experience in the design and implementation of mechatronic and production engineering courses. His non-academic career is centered on product development and manufacturing processes.Dr. Alberto W Mello, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Ph.D. in Aerospace from the
Advances in Engineering Education SUMMER 2020 VOLUME 8 ISSUE 2Interventions for Promoting Student Engagementand Predicting Performance in an IntroductoryEngineering ClassA.RAVISHANKAR RAOFairleigh Dickinson UniversityTeaneck, NJ ABSTRACT Studies show that a significant fraction of students graduating from high schools in the U.S. isill prepared for college and careers. Some problems include weak grounding in math and writing,lack of motivation, and insufficient conscientiousness. Academic institutions are under pressure toimprove student retention and graduate rates, whereas students are under pressure to graduateand find employment. Consequently
Bangladesh). She also works on better understanding undergraduate engineering student interests, behaviors, development, and career choices related to innovation and entrepreneurship. Harris earned her Ph.D. (2015) and M.S. (2010) in Environmental Engineering from Stanford Univer- sity. She also received her B.S. in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology (2009).Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied
to grow at a faster rate than the demand for qualified graduates inother occupations. Despite the value and increasing necessity of STEM skills within today’ssociety and the 21st century workforce, substantial numbers of Americans still do not have equalaccess to postsecondary STEM education and, thus, have limited opportunities for STEM-relatedemployment and careers [4].Along with unequal access to STEM degree programs, researchers report stark differencesbetween traditional and nontraditional undergraduate enrollment and degree attainment in STEM,wherein nontraditional students consistently fare worse. Chen and Weko [5] found it was atypicalfor students who were older, financially self-supporting, or from low socio-economicbackgrounds to
between our students, parks and wildlife personnel, our local zoological society members and othercommunity volunteers, have led to increased awareness of the importance of wetlands to our environment andhealth. The opportunities awarded to our minority students have additionally made an impact in our community,holistically advancing their education and career goals.Transitioning from a Two-Year to Four-Year InstitutionThe need for a smoother transition between a community college and a university was identified by the principalinvestigators of STEMGROW, a grant that has been funded by the Department of Education’s Hispanic ServingInstitutions division. Specifically, the desire for students to delve into the STEM fields of environmental science
6. I feel included in the groups that I want to belong to 7. I feel competent to achieve my goals 8. I get along with people I come into contact with 9. I feel my choices express who I really am 10. I feel I am doing what really interests me 11. People are generally pretty friendly towards me 12. I feel I can successfully complete difficult tasks 13. I feel optimistic about my career prospects after I complete my educationOur research question is: How do students’ sense of community change over time through anintroductory computer programming sequence? Hypothesis: Women and under-represented minority students feel less a part of the community, as compared to men, at the start
Paper ID #28510The Engineer of 2020 as of 2020Dr. Brock E. Barry P.E., U.S. Military Academy Dr. Brock E. Barry, P.E. is Professor of Engineering Education in the Department of Civil & Mechanical Engineering at The United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. Dr. Barry holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Rochester Institute of Technology, a Master of Science degree from University of Colorado at Boulder, and a PhD from Purdue University. Prior to pursuing a career in academics, Dr. Barry spent 10-years as a senior geotechnical engineer and project manager on projects through- out the United States
common attribute of Gen Z is thatthey tend to be very inclusive in nature and willing to rally around causes.The technologies of Industry 4.0 coupled with generational transition are driving the need to stepup workforce development efforts. Industry 4.0 skills have become critical components of labormarkets [2]. Developing and retaining an Industry 4.0-ready workforce demands that industryand educators go beyond traditional reskilling and upskilling initiatives. Organizations mustfocus on career strategies, talent mobility and re-engineering ecosystems to drive organizationalreinvention and new business models.Objectives of this ResearchThis research seeks to build on the work of Pistrui and Kleinke et al. [3] [4] and Petrick, andMcCreary [5] to
TAs fulfill the role ofsecondary instructor, supporting a course via laboratories, recitations, grading, and otherteaching activities. Whether faculty or TA, primary or secondary, instructors employ a range ofinstructional approaches to engage student learning and interact with students to develop rapport,answer questions, and further scaffold instruction. Although there remains some confusion inthe literature regarding terms, faculty support generally refers to teaching technique (bothteacher-centered and student-centered) while faculty interactions refer to more informalexchanges with students which include both curriculum and course-based interactions as well asconversations about career and other intellectual matters. In this paper, we
they can develop the knowledge, skills, and relationships needed to be aresearch engineer. Another initiative seeks to develop a Research Engineer Network (REN) ofindividuals that will impart skills and mentoring to graduate students, that may not available to them fromtheir own major professor and her/his research group. The network will be composed of graduatestudents, select major professors, select faculty from R1 universities, and representatives from corporateresearch and federal research laboratories. The REN will have three tracks of activities: ResearchProgression Skills (REN-RPS), Research Networking Skills (REN-RNS), and Career Preview andPreparation (REN-CPP). Each track of activities will be offered in Fall and Spring. The REN
StateUniversity, The University of Maryland and the University of Central Florida have developed aminor in undergraduate engineering leadership where students develop leadership skills throughexperiential learning projects [4], [21], [22]. Iowa State University created a 4-year Engineeringleadership program with a goal of creating future leaders who can make contributions in thecomplex engineering world through values-based learning beyond traditional engineering [23].In spite of the extensive efforts on developing leadership programs at different institutions, fewstudies have measured leadership behaviors and monitored changes post implementation andinvestigated the impact of these programs on early career engineers [11], [12], [24]. Specifically,there
skills while strengthening their teamwork skills.Course DescriptionThe Ag Engineering Technology department at the University of Wisconsin-River Fallscurrently offers three sequential food process engineering courses – Food and ProcessEngineering I, Food and Process Engineering II, and Food Bioprocess Technology – for studentsinterested in food engineering as a career track. Food and Process Engineering I (AGEN 352) isone of the core engineering courses that all Ag Engineering Technology (AET), Ag Engineering(AE), and Food Science and Technology (FS&T) majors are required to take regardless of eachstudent’s option or emphasis within the major.Food and Process Engineering I (AGEN 352) aims to teach the common engineering conceptsthat are