address the research question: Willproviding peer mentoring sessions help improve the performance in Fundamentals ofEngineering course offered at a regional campus? The concepts covered in the course integratethe scientific principles and mathematical problem solving with practical applications utilizingengineering tools. Data analysis in Excel, application based programming in MATLAB andsoftware design project are three main components of the course. Although most of theapplication assignments encourage teamwork, students find it difficult to learn and implementthe functionality of tools and lack confidence in accomplishing the tasks in a timely manner. Therationale behind peer mentoring approach is to provide support and a medium for students
on Digital Manufacturing. Her research is focused on mechatronics, digital manufacturing, digital thread, cyber physical systems, broadening participation, and engineering education. She is a Director of Mechatronics and Digital Manufacturing Lab at ODU and a lead of Area of Specialization Mecha- tronics Systems Design. She worked as a Visiting Researcher at Commonwealth Center for Advanced Manufacturing in Disputanta, VA on projects focusing on digital thread and cyber security of manufactur- ing systems. She has funded research in broadening participation efforts of underrepresented students in STEM funded by Office of Naval Research, focusing on mechatronic pathways. She is part of the ONR project related to
develop and build up theirentrepreneurial mindset.The paper reviews the CoE’s experience and preliminary evaluation results of integrating EMLin our junior level course EE375 Electronic Design I. EE375 is the first electronics course of athree-course electronics design sequence. The course covers circuits design using diodes andtransistors with several laboratory experiments.“The three Cs: Curiosity, Connections, and Creating Value [3]” found in the KEEN frameworkare added as course outcomes. CoE included EML activities into the existing problem-basedlearning (PBL) laboratory projects. For example, the projects help students investigate themarket and assess policy and regulatory issues. The paper will provide preliminary results fromthese
pursuing postsecondaryeducation, and prepare for high-demand careers [11]. Several factors are associated withstudents’ continued participation in STEM disciplines, and ultimately, their pursuit of STEMcareers. An important factor is student interest in STEM. Research indicates that hands-on,inquiry-based activities delivered in informal environments are key factors in helping to developcritical thinking skills and play a significant role in increasing students’ interest and engagementin STEM and the likelihood that they will consider science-related occupations [12].The engineering-focused STEM Academy project is a partnership between an institution ofhigher learning, school districts, state agencies, private foundations, and other STEM
American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Modeling a Perceptron Neural Network Using Verilog Developed Floating- Point Numbering System and Modules for Hardware SynthesisAbstractThe purpose of a capstone design project is to provide graduating senior students the opportunityto demonstrate understanding of the concepts they have learned during the course of their studies.As with many engineering programs, students of the computer engineering program at Utah ValleyUniversity (UVU) conclude their degree programs with a semester capstone design experience.This paper presents the details of a sample project that a student has done in this capstone course.This senior design project implements the perceptron neural network using Systems
Standards (BS) Task Force (OBS) and theTraining, Accreditation, Standards, Guidance (TASG) Task Force [7]. The project timeline forthe revised 103 Standards implementation was: Approval by Standards Committee 2/2014 Board Approval 7/2014 Document 102 & A-3 2/2015 Training 7/2015 Pilot Testing with new OBS Standards 103 Fall 2015 Programs can use either Old Standard or New Standard for Accreditation Spring 2016 All Programs will use New OBS
University Tracy Volz is the Director of the Program in Writing and Communication at Rice University. She oversees the First-year Writing-intensive Seminar Program, the Center for Written, Oral, and Visual Communica- tion, ESL prorgramming for international students, and Communication in the Disciplines projects. Prior to leading the PWC, Dr. Volz spent 15 years integrating written, oral, and visual communication into undergraduate and graduate courses in the Brown School of Engineering at Rice. Her current scholarly interest focuses on the use of flipped pedagogy in first-year engineering design. She received her Ph.D. in English from Rice University in 2001.Dr. Ann Saterbak, Duke University Ann Saterbak is Professor
) continuedavailability of critical resources, (2) readiness maintained in the face of climate change, (3) wasteand pollution minimized, and (4) management and practices built on sustainability andcommunity [14]”. The course is designed to develop baseline competencies in students thatprepare them to address these four primary objectives.All graduates of the USAFA will commission into the US Air Force and serve a minimum offive years. In this position graduates fundamentally are decision makers. Regardless of major,they will be prioritizing, executing and advocating for a variety of projects. Their ability tounderstand the long term implications of sustainable and resilient infrastructure is critical tomaintaining national defense. Additionally, many graduates
enables her to combine a deep understanding of scientific principles with the ability to tell a compelling story to communicate the scientific and potential societal impact of individual research projects. Her targeted campaigns raise the perceived stature of the organization and lead to successful institutional fundraising. After graduating from Williams College with a bachelor’s degree in chemistry and French, Thuy earned a Ph.D. in chemistry from the University of Hawaii. In her early career, she was a research scientist at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and held management positions in several engineering firms, including CH2M HILL, Lockheed Martin, and Los Alamos Technical Associates. While pursuing her
community colleges and baccalaureate institutions in Washington State. He is passionate about helping faculty and staff support community college students in reaching their ed- ucational and career goals. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 The SEECRS Scholar Academy at Whatcom Community College: An S-STEM Scholarship ProgramAbstractThe STEM Excellence through Engagement in Collaboration, Research, and Scholarship(SEECRS) project at Whatcom Community College is a five-year program aiming to supportacademically talented students with demonstrated financial need in biology, chemistry, geology,computer science, engineering, and physics. This project is funded by an
Technical College Jill Davishahl is a faculty member in the engineering department at Bellingham Technical College where she teaches courses ranging from Intro to Engineering Design to Engineering Statics. Outside of teach- ing, Jill is working on the development of a Bachelor of Applied Science in Engineering Technology and is currently PI on the NSF funded ATE project grant in renewable energy as well as PI on an NSF funded S-STEM project. She holds a Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Washington.Mr. Eric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College Eric Davishahl is faculty and engineering program coordinator at Whatcom Community College. His teaching and research interests include
, culminated in Engineering Justice: Transforming Engineering Education and Practice (Wiley-IEEE Press, 2017).Dr. Kathryn Johnson, Colorado School of Mines Kathryn Johnson is an Associate Professor at the Colorado School of Mines in the Department of Electri- cal Engineering and is Jointly Appointed at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s National Wind Technology Center. In 2011, she was a visiting researcher at Aalborg University in Denmark, where she collaborated on wind turbine control research and experienced Aalborg’s Problem-Based Learning method. She has researched wind turbine control systems since 2002, with numerous projects related to reducing turbine loads and increasing energy capture. She has applied
CoNECD ASEE Conference April 29-May 1, 2018Members of the CSP-Hatchery team include: • Timothy Andersen, PhD, Professor, BSU CS • Amit Jain, PhD, Associate Professor, BSU CS • Dianxiang Xu, PhD, Professor, BSU CS • Noah Salzman, PhD, Assistant Professor, Electrical Engineering & Engineering Education (IdoTeach) • Don Winiecki, EdD, PhD, Professor of Ethics & Morality in Professional Practice, College of Engineering, BSU, and Professor, Organizational Performance & Workplace Learning, [Social Scientist] • Carl Siebert, PhD, Assistant Professor, Curriculum & Instruction (Education), [Outside Evaluator]As required by NSF, the project team included experts in engineering education and
education research. She obtained her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2005. Her Ph.D. work at Stan- ford University focused on optoelectronics, and she continues that work in her position at the Colorado School of Mines, primarily with the involvement of undergraduate researchers. In her role as an Associate Teaching Professor, she is primarily tasked with the education of undergraduate engineers. In her courses, she employs active learning techniques and project-based learning. Her previous education research, also at Stanford, focused on the role of cultural capital in science education. Her current interests include en- gineering students’ development of social
experience at K&A Wireless as a research associate in Albuquerque (USA). Additionally, he has profes- sional experience at Hitachi Automotive Systems America as an Intern in Research & Development in Detroit (USA) and Senior Product Engineer at Fiat Chrysler Automobiles in Brazil. He served as the President of Student Platform for Engineering Education Development (SPEED). Before joining SPEED, Claudio served as co-founder of the Student Chapter of the Brazilian Automation Society. Among his many achievements, his project was awarded the Best Student Initiative for Engineering Students pro- moted by Cengage Learning. He received the Leadership Award by ISTEC, and the Young Scientist Award supported by
the ways in which this identity is influenced by stu- dents’ academic relationships, events, and experiences. Dr. Groen holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering from the South Dakota School of Mines & Technology.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa D. McNair is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as Director of the Center for Research in SEAD Education at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures
Paper ID #21481Analysis of Student Utilization and Activities in a Campus Innovation CenterDr. William A. Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Bill Kline is Professor of Engineering Management and Associate Dean of Innovation at Rose-Hulman. His teaching and professional interests include systems engineering, quality, manufacturing systems, in- novation, and entrepreneurship. As Associate Dean, he directs the Branam Innovation Center which houses campus competition teams, maker club, and projects. He is currently an associate with IOI Partners, a consulting venture focused on innovation tools and systems. Prior
the students were, forexample, the technical design of low-tech tools for the material supply of biogas plants (countryof application: Tanzania) or the optimization of emergency shelters after strong earthquakes(country of application: Nepal). Based on the Australian model, the Challenge, at RWTHAachen university, follows six phases (cf. fig. 1): 1. Engineers Without Borders (EWB) and the project team identifies relevant topics 2. EWB and the project team composes info material for students and lecturers 3. Lecturers integrate the topics into their lectures 4. In teamwork, students develop ideas and create solution concepts and afterwards write reports 5. Students present their concepts in front of a jury 6. EWB and the
motivated by engineering applications. In particular, she is interested in high-dimensional machine learning problems that stem from applications, including data analysis issues related to STEM education research. She created ”Project Rhea,” a student-driven online learning project at www.projectrhea.org. She is a three-time recipient of Purdue’s Seed for Suc- cess Award. She is also a recipient of the Eta Kappa Nu Outstanding Faculty Award, the Eta Kappa Nu Outstanding Teaching Award and the Wilfred ”Duke” Hesselberth Award for Teaching Excellence. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Characterizing MOOC Learners from Survey Data Using Modeling and 𝒏𝒏-TARP
Paper ID #22351The Impact of a Creativity-focused REU on Students’ Conceptions of Re-search and CreativityDr. Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Sarah Zappe is Research Associate and Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State. She holds a doctoral degree in educational psychology emphasizing applied measurement and testing. In her position, Sarah is responsible for developing instructional support programs for faculty, providing evaluation support for educational proposals and projects, and working with faculty to publish
; society program in the De- partment of Engineering and Society at the University of Virginia. He is the principal investigator at University of Virginia on the ’4C Project’ on Cultivating Cultures of Ethical STEM education with col- leagues from Notre Dame, Xavier University and St. Mary’s College. He is also the co-leader of the ’Nano and the City’ thematic research cluster for the Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University. Rider is a Research Collaborator with the Sustainability Science Education program at the Biodesign Institute. His research focuses on wicked problems that arise at the intersection of society and technology. Rider holds a Ph.D. in Sustainability from Arizona State University
Paper ID #22797Innovative Mars Exploration Education and Technology Program: Develop-ment of an Informal Learning Curriculum (Work in Progress)Mr. Srujal Patel, Georgia Institute of Technology Mr. Srujal Patel serves as the research faculty at Guggenheim School of Aerospace Engineering (AE) at Georgia Institute of Technology. Mr. Patel earned his dual M.S. degrees in Aerospace Engineering and Applied Mathematics at Georgia Tech with specialization in Applied Numerical Analysis and Computa- tional Fluid Dynamics/Aerodynamics. After joining as the research faculty, Mr. Patel worked as project manager for the Manufacturing
University. He received his B.S. (2005), M.S. (2008), and Ph.D. (2012) from Michigan State University. His area of expertise is in cementitious composites which includes: fracture and fatigue mechanics of quasi-brittle materials, recycled concrete, conductive concrete, reinforced concrete, pervious concrete, geopolymer, and structural dynamics. He currently teaches a wide array of courses that includes statics, reinforced concrete design, structural analysis, and materials engineering. Dr. Brake actively integrates project based and peer assisted learning pedagogies into his curriculum.Dr. Xianchang Li, Lamar University Dr. Li received his Ph.D. degree from Clemson University in 1999 and now serves as an associate profes
toamalgam the design iterative process to what is possible with software including augmented reality in orderto convey both generative design and generative learning possibilities; project management requiresspecific operations affecting the optimal outcome. The workshop is a design challenge to engage engineering concepts, develop processes, and retainsolutions; the process begins with a sketch, draws on concept inventories, and completes with a teamdiscussion on possible improvements to the approach. The exercise is extremely hands-on and involves amyriad of engineering hard and soft skills to perform under time and resource constraints. Drawing on“How people Learn” the prototype for the workshop attempts to generate outcomes based on
Engineering Education, 2018 Evaluation of Online Learning in a First-year Engineering Design CourseABSTRACTThis evidence based practice paper evaluates an online project-based design engineering course.Because of increasing enrollments in engineering courses, class facilities on campus cannotaccommodate for additional students. Adding to this problem is that universities may simply nothave enough instructors to offer additional course sections to accommodate class growth.Therefore, online learning may be one pathway to address this problem. We examined a first-year engineering course, which consisted of both lecture and lab sections. In this course, studentsdesigned, built and tested a remote controlled and an autonomous device over the duration of
of a project rubric) and report thedata annually. Yearly reflection meetings of faculty members analyze the data, exploringexpectations and findings. The existing data collection and analysis process serves to documentthe faculty value placed on the importance of the measurement of achievement throughout thecurriculum.An electronic portfolio allows the aggregate insights gained by faculty from assessment datacollection to be extended to the individual student. The electronic portfolio would offer thelearner the opportunity to gather and upload performance indicators throughout the curriculum.Because best practice recommends that student outcomes are assessed at multiple points in acurriculum, the students would be able to see the future
use in this course. Next, wedescribe the development of our lecture material and laboratory exercise and how they buildtowards the final project that we assign to students. We then present a questionnaire that wewould be asking students to fill out followed by our concluding remarks.II. Course OrganizationEGR680: PYNQ Platform is the graduate level course to be offered to Computer Engineering aswell as Computer Science students in the School of Engineering at Grand Valley StateUniversity who are interested in developing applications on FPGA. The semester long coursewill include approximately three hours of lecture per week integrated with laboratory/learningactivity session. Topics covered in the course are divided into 4 areas: hardware
process and understanding customer design specifications; and Marshmallow launcher build and competition.The concepts associated with the engineering design process were intentionally frontloaded tobetter prepare students for the marshmallow launching project and the pumpkin chunkin’competition. Both projects, marshmallow and pumpkin launchers, were a form of frontloading interms of doing a prototype model and then going to full-scale.The concept of teamwork was frontloaded by having students experience the design process withthe marshmallow launcher (first project) in a small team of three before receiving a formal lectureon teamwork. After a formal lecture and activity, the students were put into a much larger team ofsix for the pumpkin
engineer in the states of Connecticut and California, Dr. Jiang has been involved in the design of a variety of low- rise and high-rise projects. His current research interests mainly focus on Smart Structures Technology, Structural Control and Health Monitoring and Innovative Engineering Education.Prof. Hamid Mahmoodi, San Francisco State University Hamid Mahmoodi received his Ph.D. degree in electrical and computer engineering from Purdue Univer- sity, West Lafayette, IN, in 2005. He is currently a professor of electrical and computer engineering in the School of Engineering at San Francisco State University. His research interests include low-power, reliable, and high-performance circuit design in nano-electronic
have documented: elective face-to-face courses [3],[4], online courses [5], course concentrations [6], [7], capstone experiences [8], [9], and project-based courses embedded in the engineering curriculum [2], [10]–[12]. Most studies on entrepreneurship education have analyzed psychological outcomes, such asself-efficacy and entrepreneurial intent [13]. Few of them have explored short and long-termeffects on professional competencies and career goals [14]. Some of them have used classroomassessment techniques and academic records to understand students’ conceptions ofentrepreneurial learning [15], [16], but more efforts are needed to explore how students learn aboutentrepreneurship as they develop ownership of their ideas [17]. This article