' critical thinking and problem-solving skills.In project-based activities, participants experimented with materials to examine their light-reflective properties. This material testing informed the design of daylighting systems for modelhouses, allowing students to directly apply the EDP. Through this hands-on approach, studentssynthesized their theoretical learning with tangible engineering tasks, and embodied the role ofengineers in solving contemporary challenges.Tools and InstrumentsQuantitative InstrumentsFor the quantitative analysis, we administered structured pre- and post-intervention surveys toevaluate changes in students' self-efficacy, STEM identity, and engineering knowledge. Thesesurveys, which featured a series of items on a 5-point
advisor, peer mentor, participate in the Careers inScience at Iona (CSI) Program, conduct summer research with a research advisor, and enroll intailored courses for DESIRE cohorts [41]. 22 DESIRE Scholars and 20 students from a controlgroup were surveyed on their campus engagement. DESIRE Scholars were significantly morelikely to be engaged in work study, student organizations, research projects, and professionalconferences when compared to students with similar academic and financial backgrounds thatwere not in DESIRE. One study [35] explored components of the University of Arkansas’ Pathto Graduation, an S-STEM program that serves up to 36 students and is meant to increase thenumber of STEM students from low-income, rural backgrounds, during
, demonstrating her commitment to excellence and innovation. Her active involvement in research projects and organizing key events, such as the Annual Geomatics Conference at Fresno State, highlights her dedication to her field and community.Dr. Kimberly Stillmaker PE, California State University, Fresno Dr. Kimberly Stillmaker is an Associate Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at CSU, Fresno in the area of structural engineering and the director of the Lyles College of Engineering Foundations for Success Program. She attained her PhD in Civil Engineering at UC Davis. Her research interests include structural steel welded connections and gender equity in engineering. She is a Co-PI on an NSF ADVANCE Partnership
below. Moreover, R1 institutions, which tend to be more selective and frequently offerterminal/doctoral degrees, represent just about 3 percent of all postsecondary institutions inthe United States in 2017 [47].In addition, many institutions are mission driven: Land-grant and religiously affiliatedinstitutions, and those receiving funding from mission-driven federal agencies (e.g.,Department of Defense MURI projects), prioritize initiatives that impact student bodydemographics and programs offered – which may, in turn, affect gender-specific majoringand graduation dynamics. The landscape of postsecondary institutions is also internallystratified: A disproportionately large number of women and African American studentsattend 2-year and for
Formation of Engineers,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2019, p. 32173. doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 32173.[40] A. Wilson-Lopez, C. Sias, A. Smithee, and I. M. Hasbún, “Forms of science capital mobilized in adolescents’ engineering projects,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 246–270, 2018, doi: 10.1002/tea.21418.[41] J. Martin, M. Miller, and K. Gipson, Utilization of a Think-Aloud Protocol to Cognitively Validate a Survey Instrument Identifying Social Capital Resources of Engineering Undergraduates. 2011. doi: 10.18260/1-2--18492.[42] D. Radhakrishnan, J. DeBoer, and N. Bhide, “Recentering local knowledge and developing collaborative
practices in the ABET criteria.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2215788. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] National Research Council, A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2012, p. 13165. doi: 10.17226/13165.[2] C. L. Dym, P. Little, and E. J. Orwin, Engineering design: a project-based introduction, 4th Ed. New York: Wiley, 2014.[3] R. Lehrer, M. J. Kim, and R. S. Jones, “Developing conceptions of statistics
protocol.Table 2: Interview Protocol Interview Questions Probing Questions Section Subcategory (theory) (conversational) How did you learn about this research project? Tell me more about yourself. General N/A Tell me about your family. Background How did you learn about this institute
technological and non-technological methods to enhance the learning processes of undergraduate engineering students. He is currently leading a second research project related to use of mobile learning technologies in undergraduate engineering education. This research explores available empirical evidence about the role mobile learning technologies may play in improving student accessibility to knowledge, academic engagement and motivation, and self-regulation.Dr. Sheryl A. Sorby, University of Cincinnati Dr. Sheryl Sorby is currently a Professor of STEM Education at the University of Cincinnati and was recently a Fulbright Scholar at the Dublin Institute of Technology in Dublin, Ireland. She is a professor emerita of
across disciplines of physics, chemistry, biology, and engineering. He is interested specifically in the interactions between ferroelectric, ferromagnetic, and ferroelastic materials on the nanoscale, with emphasis placed on the applications of these materials to electronic devices. Dr. Carvell is also interested in research in engineering and physics education and has presented research on multiple topics in this area, with more projects moving forward. While at Marian, Dr. Carvell has taught eleven courses across the physics and engineering programs. He also received the Marian University Advisor of the Year and the E. S. Witchger School of Engineering Award for Service Excellence, both in 2022, and the E. S
curriculum will beaccessible on GitHub for engineering educators to build this low-cost educational tool withintheir engineering program. In conclusion, this proposed mechatronics actuator education testplatform promises to significantly enhance education accessibility, serving as an invaluablelearning tool for mechatronics students to acquire a hands-on learning experience.IntroductionIncorporating a hands-on laboratory curriculum is a great way to solidify theoretical concepts toreal-world practice in a classroom setting. Having a versatile physical tool to experiment withwill go a long way toward helping students retain information with engineering practice.Students working on a mechatronic project have to make an engineering selection of the
projects. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work in Progress: The Role of Student Backgrounds in Understanding Racial Disparities in ComputingIntroduction and MotivationThe purpose of this work-in-progress paper is to understand how students’ experiencesdiscussing race shape their attitudes toward privilege in computing and, through these insights,shed light on the challenges in establishing inclusive computing environments. Internationalmovements such as #BlackInTheIvory and #ShutDownSTEM [1], [2] have demanded thatscience, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM), and computing fields change to fosterinclusivity. Despite this, there is a persistent underrepresentation
, 2009.[12] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, “Minority Serving Institutions: America's Underutilized Resource for Strengthening the STEM Workforce,” Washington, DC, The National Academies Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.17226/25257.[13] H. K. Ro, S. Aguilar-Smith, S. Y. Anderson, T. Rodriguez, E. J. Ramon, and D. Javier, “Attending to STEM education in servingness at Hispanic-serving institutions: a systematic review of more than a decade of scholarship,” International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 11, no. 1, 2024.[14] Student Experience Project. “Increasing equity in college student experience: Findings from a national collaborative,” 2022.[15] C. S. Dweck. Self-theories: Their
engineering—design course content toaddress societal inequities and use varied teaching methods, like project-based learning or groupwork, to foster inclusive learning environments. Second, the vertical axis in CCS examines how power dynamics, policies, andhierarchical structures across socially produced scales—from local to global—shape educationalpractices and outcomes [35], [36]. In this study, the vertical axis explores how multi-levelinfluences, such as departmental initiatives, institutional policies, and broader societal trends,impact faculty decisions regarding DEIJ in curriculum and pedagogy. For example, verticalcomparisons draw attention to how actors at various levels—such as individual faculty,departments, and national policy
Paper ID #45160Engaging Two-Year Students in STEM: A Professional STEM Society’s Effortsto Support Community College StudentsDr. Roberta Rincon, Society of Women Engineers Roberta Rincon, Ph.D., is the Director of Research and Impact for the Society of Women Engineers. She is responsible for overseeing the research activities for the organization, including collaborative research projects with external researchers and dissemination of SWE research through academic conferences, the SWE Research website, and the annual SWE State of Women in Engineering magazine issue. She is the Principal Investigator for the NSF INCLUDES
expertise, particularly concerningSTEM course adaptation. This contrast with Amanda’s experience highlights the variability ininstitutional responses to accessibility, reinforcing the need for more specialized support inhigher education.Research and Development in Accessibility TechnologyThroughout his education, Gene’s lived experiences shaped his commitment to developingaccessibility technology. His roles at the University of Washington, Northeastern University, andthe University of Chicago allowed him to contribute to projects enhancing accessibility,including shape shifting devices and 3D modeling tools. His work on automated knittingmachines producing tactile graphics exemplifies his focus on bridging technology and disability,and he has
changes andconsiderations for collecting data, capturing relevant insights from participants, and documentingthe process to achieve these objectives in four STEM outreach programs held during the summerof 2024.The increasing demand for skilled professionals in STEM underscores the importance ofattracting and retaining students in these fields. According to projections, the workforce needsfor engineers are expected to grow significantly, driven by advancements in technology and theevolving nature of the global economy [2]. However, this anticipated growth presents achallenge: women and minorities remain significantly underrepresented in STEM occupations,despite various initiatives aimed at increasing diversity and inclusion [3]. This lack
integrating group projects and collaborative assignments. • Engaging Content Delivery: The incorporation of surveys, questionnaires, discussion prompts, videos, webinars, and infographics can improve the quality of online lectures. Comprehension and interest can be enhanced by dividing lectures into brief segments and correlating concepts to real-world scenarios. • Updated Resources: The learning experience is improved by maintaining a diverse and current selection of course materials. Ensuring that resources are accessible across devices and that they are updated with the most recent research, trends, and case studies can accommodate a variety of learning styles. Regular student feedback is
undergraduates feel morecomfortable in spaces where they are in the minority. Examples of these practices includeintentionally building mixed gender small groups for project-based learning, the utilization ofhumanizing language (e.g., the use of the term women versus girls), emphasizing thecontributions of women scientists and engineers, and incorporating relevant social issues intocourse discussions and lectures. Beyond pedagogical choices, providing flexibility is a small wayto model to undergraduate women that their experiences are distinct. For my participants, thislooked like simply checking in with women students to ensure they are comfortable in certainspaces. Some allies discussed checking in with women assigned to small groups with all
, 2012). Considering the innovation-driven and knowledge-based nature of the U.S. economy,employment opportunities in STEM are projected to increase at a much faster rate than those innon-STEM occupations (CIC, 2014). Also, employees in STEM occupations have and shouldcontinue to experience higher average salaries and lower unemployment rates than theircontemporaries in non-STEM fields (CIC, 2014; Daymont & Andrisani, 1984; Wise, 1975). Inspite of the aforementioned perquisites of working in STEM fields, however, the United Statescontinues to severely lack individuals with the qualifications needed to assume these jobs (CIC,2014; U.S. CJEC, 2012). The insufficiency of the U.S. STEM workforce partially derives fromtwo major factors: 1
women of other groups toagree with two statements “In meetings, other people get credit for ideas I originally offered.”And “After moving from an engineering role to a project management/business role, peopleassume I do not have technical skills.” The differences are statistically significant.Table 1B reported the percentage agreement of men in different racial groups on the Prove-It-Again questions. As mentioned above, the majority of the sample is female (please see appendixC for gender and race breakdown of the sample.) Only 45 engineers took the survey self-identified as men of color. Due to the very small number of male engineers in the sample, wedid not further breakdown non-white male engineers into more detailed racial groups. Men
learning environments in academic settings. Her research has been funded by the National Science Foundation (an Ethics in Science and Engineering project to develop frameworks for developing ethical reasoning in engineers, and a Cyberlearning project to develop collaborative design environments for engineers), and by corporate foundations, the Department of Homeland Security, the College of En- gineering, and the Purdue Research Foundation. She has been recognized as the inaugural Butler Faculty Scholar, a Faculty Fellow in the CERIAS institute, a Service Learning Faculty Fellow, Diversity Faculty Fellow, and recipient of the Violet Haas Award (for efforts on behalf of women), all at Purdue University. This year she is
fromunderrepresented minority backgrounds. For this reason, the Two or More Races group wasincluded in our analysis, but all pool projection numbers were adjusted by 82%. Table 7. 2012 Cohort ACT and SAT underrepresented minority student test takers. ACT SAT ACT File SAT File Ethnicity or Race Takers Takers Provided Provided 222,237 217,656 209,986 15,107 Black/African American (13.3%) (13.1%) (13.4%) (15.1%) 13,523 9,716 13,265 589
systematic literature reviews, includingconducting comprehensive searches of reputable databases, applying pre-determined selectioncriteria, performing an extraction of data, and a determination and report of findings (Borrego etal., 2014). Our processes are described further.Search Procedures and Search StringsA search for information sources to study the gender gap among Middle Eastern femaleengineering students was conducted. Specifically, we used the database Education Source tosearch for articles. We used one database because this was a preliminary project. Based on ourinclusion criteria, we sought to locate articles which were: ● Included college-age participants from a Middle Eastern country, ● Which discussed gendered differences.Given
I think for me, that cultural class really helped me understand better how to interactwith people in the area.” Participant 9 mentioned, “we learned that Italy and Switzerland wereboth very high context countries, so they would like to get to know each other more beforecontinuing a project, or just really care about personal relationships…”The value of free time/personal exploration outside of the classroom to develop globalcompetencies was articulated in sentiments such as “I think honestly, just the freedom to roamand figure out stuff out for ourselves was what helped us learn a lot. Like, as the example says,that stores are closed during lunch -- you could probably look that up and find it. But, actuallyseeing it would help you
respectively), white women are10% less likely to identify HC as active compared to white men (19 vs to 29 respectively). POCare 14% more likely to identify HC as active compared to their white counterparts (40 vs to 26respectively). The identity of race seems to be more salient than that of gender. While the authorscould postulate that these anomalies could be explained through the theory of critical whitenessstudies, that line of inquiry is outside the scope of this project. Looking forward, it would seem that the more marginalized identities one holds, the morelikely that person would deem HC to be active, and the higher likelihood that person would wantothers that look like them in engineering, be it by gender, race, or their intersection
for engineering classes, so that's why’Whitney (2022 SBP participant), when asked if her prior (K-12) engineering experiences impactedher SBP experience: ‘I think it did. But I came in here and knew what I was doing. But the thing is, other people didn't. They had little experience with engineering. That's fine. It was just more so they felt that I was a bit controlling, which I try not to come across that way, but it was more so I just knew what I was doing because I had done it twice before. Structured like this, like we're given a project or task and we're going to make it, print it and do slides and present it to a panel of judges. I did that with my [space company] internship, with my engineering
motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of studenDr. Kelly J. Cross, University of Nevada, Reno Dr. Cross is currently an Assistant Professor in the Biomedical Engineering Department at Georgia Tech. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 “Are you sure you know what you’re talking about?”: Epistemic Injustice Exposed by Stereotype Threat in EngineeringAbstractCurrently and historically, women are underrepresented in engineering. One possible explanationfor this phenomenon is the masculine engineering culture that rewards the ideas and behaviors ofmen over women. Researchers have shown that women who display more masculine attributestend to be more
because (…) I'm the Black guy leftover at the meeting. Who am I going to talk to?"He goes on to explain that this same level of only-ness in the discipline-based organizationreflects the attitudes he experienced from his peers in the classroom. He described, "In classes, I already have to do all these projects with all these people that just don't want to work with me. Why would I do that outside of classes? (…) Like, I'm open to working with them, but like, you know, racism, so like, they already have their opinions of me before they even know me." For Killua and the other Study Leaders, many of their struggles in their engineeringleadership journey also include a layer related to their personal identity
needs of disabledstudents. We also carefully considered our own privileged identities that may bias the analysis,namely, being white, English-speaking, U.S. citizens in academia.Methods The findings presented here are a subset of a larger project and data collection effortfocusing more broadly on the experiences of disabled students. Complete methodological detailscan be found in (Figard et al., 2023).Research Design The primary data sources for our study are ten semi-structured interviews with disabledengineering students. These interviews were conducted at a single site by the first author in Fall2022. Interview transcripts were analyzed in two rounds by using thematic analysis with acritical lens. Open coding was used during