Engineering Education. 2016;105(1):6-14.19. Hanneman RA, Riddle M. Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: Published digitally at http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/; 2005.20. Blumberg R, Atre S. The problem with unstructured data. DM REVIEW. 2003;13(42-49):62.21. https://www.arangodb.com. Accessed last on Janueary 28, 2016.22. http://www.tableau.com. Accessed last on February 1, 2016.23. https://www.rstudio.com. Accessed last on February 1, 2016.24. National Academy of Engineering. Grand challenges for engineering in the 21st century. 2008; http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/. Accessed March 9, 2011, 2010.25. Jain AK. Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means. Pattern recognition letters
are an engineer working for company x to reverseengineer a product of company y). The assignments were set up in such a way that eachindividual student learns each of the skills first, reports on them one week, and then applies themto follow-up assignments in group settings the next week(s). Templates were constructed andgrading rubrics implemented to coordinate and standardize all documents and grading. A coursetemplate with all documents and assignments was set up in a course management system tofacilitate uniform class delivery to all sections.In Fall 2014, approximately 180 students took the course followed by another 120 in Spring2015 and 9 in the Summer 2015. In fall 2015, 265 students were enrolled in the class followed by92 in Spring
, San Antonio, TX, June 10-13, 2012. [8]. Ghosh, S. and Rao, C. R., ed. (1996). Design and Analysis of Experiments. Handbook of Statistics 13. North-Holland. ISBN 0-444-82061-2. [9]. Goos, Peter and Jones, Bradley (2011). Optimal Design of Experiments: A Case Study Approach. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-74461-1. [10]. Mason, R. L., Gunst, R. F., & Hess, J. L. (1989). Statistical design and analysis of experiments with applications to engineering and science. New York: Wiley. [11]. Charles K. Alexander and Mathew N.O. Sadiku, Fundamentals of Electric Circuits, Fifth Edition, McGraw Hill, ISBN 978-0-07-338057-5.[12]. Marc E. Herniter, Schematic Capture with Cadence PSpice, Prentice Hall, ISBN 978-0130484000
research, and facilities layout. Before joining to SIUE he worked at Rochester Institute of Technology as a faculty member and Computer Integrated Manufacturing System project coordinator for RIT’s integrated circuit factory. He is a senior member of IIE and SME, and a member of ASEE, Alpha Pi Mu and Tau Beta Pi.Dr. Hasan Sevim, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville Page 26.718.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 International Cooperation in an Industrial Engineering Dual-diploma Program S
help rectify this situation. In the process,it is believed that enthusiasm for engineering and science will increase among both adults andyoung people. Survey data indicates that demonstrating the underlying ingenuity behind nature,as exemplified above, has been moderately successful in accomplishing this goal.Thus far, as a part of this grant-funded project, 79 presentations have been made to communitygroups, churches and Christian schools with a total audience of 2,500 people. A diverse selectionof 23 of these groups was anonymously surveyed in an attempt to assess the impact of thepresentations and drive improvements for the future. The presentations typically close with livelyquestion and answer sessions between speaker(s) and audience. A
://www.griffith.edu.au/centre/gihe/griffith_graduate/home.html.7. Krajcik, J. S. (2010, April 23). Supporting Students in Developing Literacy in Science. Science, pp. 456-459.8. Chan, V. (2011). Teaching Oral Communication in Undergraduate Science: Are We Doing Enough and Doing it Right? Journal of Learning Design, 71-79.9. Noblitt, L. V. (2010). A comparison of case study and tradition teaching methods for improvement of oral communication and critical thinking skills. Journal of College Science Teaching, 26-32.10. Garber, R. I. (2011, August 14). 20 fears for a new millennium - replacing the 1977 Book of Lists . Retrieved from Joyful Public Speaking: http://joyfulpublicspeaking.blogspot.com/2011/08/20-fears-for-new-millennium
; Teasley, S. D.) 63–82 (American Psychological Assossiation, 1991).7. Adams, R. et al. A community of practice approach to becoming an engineering education re- search professional. in 121st ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. (2014).8. Sattler, B., Carberry, A. R. & Thomas, L. D. Graduate student peer mentoring: A means for creating an engineering education reseracg community. in Am. Soc. Eng. Educ. (2012).9. Jesiek, B. K., Newswander, L. K. & Borrego, M. Engineering Education Research: Discipline, Community, Page 26.1783.14 or Field? J. Eng. Educ. (2009).10. Katehi, L. et al. Development of Graduate Programs
,” open source ebook for undergraduate engineering economics, United States Military Academy, West Point, New York, August 20162. ABET web site of accredited programs from http://main.abet.org/aps/Accreditedprogramsearch.aspx3. American Society of Engineering Education, 2013 ASEE Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology College, accessed 10 December 2014 at http://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/14_443- 474.pdf4. Connor, H., Dench, S. & Bates, P. (2002). Skills dialogue: An assessment of skill needs in engineering, Department for Education and Employment, UK. Retrieved October 15, 2005 from http://www.employment- studies.co.uk/summary/summary.php?id=dfeesd25. Goel, Sanjay
performed multiple research projects for several Federal agencies since 1990’s dealing with; power system analysis, physics based modeling, electromagnetic signature, sensorless control, elec- tric machinery, high frequency switching, electromagnetic Interference and ship power systems modeling and analysis. Professor Mohammed has currently active research programs in a number of these areas funded by DoD, the US Department of Energy and several industries. Professor Mohammed is a world renowned leader in electrical energy systems and computational electromagnetics. He has published more than 400 articles in refereed journals and other IEEE refereed International conference records. He also authored a book and several
Foundation under GrantNos. 1223868 and 1223460.VIII. References1. International Technology and Engineering Educators Association. Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology. Publication. 3rd ed. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association, 2007.2. L. Katehi, G. Pearson and M. Feder, (Eds.), National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council, Engineering in K–12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2009.3. S. Ellis, Talk to Me, FastPencil Wavecrest, Campbell, CA, 2014.4. K. Egan, An Imaginative Approach to Teaching, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA, 2004.5. J.D. Bransford, A.L. Brown and
that both Olin and UTEP seek to model, and that partnerships like the UTEP-Olin collaboration are necessary for educating a new kind of engineer. Yet, challenges remain ineducating the broader industry and academic community about E-Lead and its benefits. It is easyfor E-Lead to be misunderstood by potential employers, parents and prospective students. As a Page 26.635.12result, learning from the introduction of Systems Engineering in the 1970’s could benefit how wehelp form our message.Bibliography[1] National Academy of Engineering (NAE). (2007). Rising Above the Gathering Storm.Retrieved from http://www.nae.edu/Publications/Reports/25575
education research and the learning sciences, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 100, No. 1, pp. 151-185, 2011.4. S. Galloway, The professional body and continuing professional development: New directions in engineering, Innovations in Education and Training International, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 231-240, 1998.5. National Academy of Engineering, Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, retrieved from http://www.nae.edu/Publications/Reports/25677.aspx, 2005.6. M.H. McCaulley, E.S. Godleski, C.F. Yokomoto, L. Harrisberger, and E.D. Sloan, Applications of psychological type in engineering education, Engineering Education, Vol. 73
ofassessment, the participants were assessed individually on the troubleshooting exercise, whichrequired them to troubleshoot following the right troubleshooting process, and to fix theidentified problem(s) in the PV system. The troubleshooting exercise was chosen because itincorporated the knowledge learned from all the other hands-on exercises. The performance ofthe individuals on the exercise was assessed by instructors using the hands-on evaluation form onthe last day of the technician-level material. Participants were rated on 4 major troubleshootingsteps: Step 1: Describe the symptoms of the problem Step 2: Diagnose/identify the problem using a systematic approach Step 3: Find the cause of the major problem Step 4
. As far as the amount of interaction and mentoring that I expected from my faculty research advisor, I did not know what to expect. From my experience in research, mentors vary significantly in their styles and approach of conducting their research and interacting with their students. At the beginning of the project, I second guessed almost every idea that I came up with and did not trust my judgment to do anything correctly or efficiently. I always ran whatever idea that I came up with by either David S. or Justin B. prior to acting on it, no matter how minor it seemed. About half-way into the research program I began to feel far more comfortable with the whole design process
courseworkCons: A ton of readiing; semesteer seems reallly long com mpared to quaarters and ovverlaps 7 weeksin to spriing quarter; a lot more material, m havee to learn terrminology thhat other law w studentsalready know; k grade almost comp pletely based d on essay fi finalOverall I would take this course again just beecause I founnd the conteent interestinng and usefull. Iam consiidering law school s over engineering e grad school . If someonee knows theyy don't want togo to law
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEeTLopLkEo) 39. Kickstarter Goldieblox: The Engineering Toy for Girls. Retrieved December 9th, 2014, (https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/16029337/goldieblox-the-engineering-toy-for-girls). 40. Hyde, J. S. and Linn M.C.. 1988. "Gender Differences in Verbal Abilities: A Meta-Analysis." Pyschological Bulletin 104:53-69. 41. Hanson, Sandra 2009. Swimming Against the Tide: African American Girls and Science Education. Temple University Press. 42. National Academy of Engineering. 2008. "Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering." Vol. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press. 43. Ceci, Stephen J
Thomas Goldfinch, “The Influence of University Entry Scores on Performance in Engineering Mechanics”, 20th Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference, Adelaide, SA, Dec 6-9, 20094. Sarah Tumen, Boaz Shulruf, and John Hattie, “Student pathways at the university: patterns and predictors of completion”, Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 233-252, 20085. Nancy J. McCormick and Marva S. Lucas, “Exploring mathematics college readiness in the United States”, Current Issues in Education, 14(1), 20116. Eileen Goold and Frank Devitt, “The role of mathematics in engineering practice and in formation of engineers”, SEFI 40th annual conference: Mathematics and Engineering Education, Thessaloniki, 20127
notable migration of e+’s direct-matriculation students out of theprogram and into discipline-specific engineering programs to three distinct shared studentmotivations: 1) students who developed a new or greater passion for a more traditional,discipline-based engineering program; 2) students who strategized acceptance to the CEASthrough the (not enrollment-limited) e+ program with the intention of transferring later to amajor they perceived as enrollment-limited; and 3) students who inadvertently arrived to the e+program thinking that it was the engineering college’s “open-option” major.Perhaps not surprisingly, the program advisor noted that many first-year students did not arrivewith a curricular plan for themselves and were slow to select
87.3 (1980), pp. 215–251. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215.[16] Edward M. Sosu. “The development and psychometric validation of a Critical Thinking Disposition Scale”. en. In: Thinking Skills and Creativity 9 (Aug. 2013), pp. 107–119. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2012.09.002.[17] Karl Duncker. “On problem-solving”. en. Trans. by Lynne S. Lees. In: Psychological Monographs 58.5 (1945), pp. i–113. DOI: 10.1037/h0093599.[18] James Paul Gee. “Learning by Design: good video games as learning machines”. en. In: E-Learning 2.1 (2005), p. 5. DOI: 10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.5.[19] Gee. Are video games good for learning? Feb. 2007.[20] R.J. Mislevy et al. “Psychometrics and Game-Based Assessment”. en. In: Technology and Testing
from http://www.aaas.org/about/mission-and- history13. Thury, H., Laursen, S. L., & Hunter, A. B. (2011). What experiences help students become scientists?: A comparative study of research and other sources of personal and professional gains for STEM undergraduates. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(4), 357-388.
experience. However, the schoolcannot easily create that holistic experience by itself. Nor can it accomplish thatintegrated engineering education mission with good but standalone or isolatedengineering lessons and activities.The engineering education community must get involved in the integration process andthose engineering faculty member(s) must have a long-term commitment to the targetschool. Initially, that commitment will be a very large time, talent, and tenacityinvestment on the engineers’ part. Big hurdles included the elementary educator’s lack ofengineering knowledge as well as their typically weak math backgrounds; finding theright materials to support the engineering challenges; building meaningful hands-onactivities with learning
,and employing good listening skills, faculty can effectively navigate a variety of career situationsto arrive at a mutually beneficial end.AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to acknowledge the review committee for the Women in EngineeringDivision, which encouraged them to formalize the panel discussion into a paper focused onacademic negotiation.References 1. Fisher, R., Ury, W. and Patton, B. (2012). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Third Ed., London: Random House 2. Harvard Business Essentials: Negotiation, 2003. 3. Kolb, D.M., Williams, J. (2003) Everyday Negotiation, Navigating the Hidden Agendas in Bargaining, Jossey-Bass. 4. Babcock, L., and Laschever, S., (2003). Women Don’t Ask
), 61-69.2. Hartmann, B. L., & Jahren, C. T. (2015). Leadership: Industry Needs for Entry-Level Engineering Positions.Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 16(3), 13-19.3. Cox, M. F., Cekic, O., & Adams, S. G. (2010). Developing Leadership Skills of Undergraduate EngineeringStudents: Perspectives from Engineering Faculty. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 11(3-4),22-33.4. Gonzalez, V. Roger. et. al. (2015). Engineering Leadership: A new Engineering Discipline, Paper #26.635.1.ASEE PEER. Seattle, Washington.5. Crumpton-Young, L., McCauley-Bush, P., Rabelo, L., Meza, K., Ferreras, A., Rodriguez, B., & ... Kelarestani, M.(2010). Engineering Leadership Development Programs a Look at What Is Needed and
administration for the engineering tutoring center consists of a director, coordinator,faculty liaison, and student employees. The director, faculty liaison, and coordinator have workedas a team on the continuous development and assessment of the day-to-day activities in the center. The director has been the main position guiding the growth and direction of ACE. Thedirector meets with departments to discuss course support in ACE and works to garner facultysupport and participation. S/he determines course support needs, works to provide newopportunities through ACE such as workshops and help sessions, provides direction for datacollection and analysis for ACE activities, advises ACE coordinator, and researches scientificliterature to improve
-other- than-graduation rates.html?pagewanted=all&_r=05. Steve Bossart, Senior Energy Analyst, DOE “Smart Grids & Microgrids for Government & Military Symposium” October 24-25, 2013, Arlington, VA.6. X. Fang, S. Misra, G. Xue, D. Yang. Smart grid – the new and improved power grid: a survey. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials (2011).7. B. Flores, "CAMPUS DIVERSITY FACTS”, http://research.utep.edu/ Default .aspx?tabid=44271, 1995-2007, (accessed 4/1/2015).8. J.V. Koch, “TQM: Why is its impact in higher education so small?,” TQM Magazine, vol. 15, no. 5, 2003, pp. 325.9. R. Schroeder, et al., “TQM in Education: Changing the Culture of Schools ” 1997; nsf.gov. http://www.nsf.gov
Paper ID #19700A Consulting Engineering Model for the EE Capstone ExperienceProf. Arnold Stanley Berger PhD, University of Washington, Bothell Arnold S. Berger is an Associate Professor and former Chair of the Division of Engineering and Math- ematics in the School of STEM at the University of Washington Bothell where he teaches classes in embedded systems, computer system design, digital and analog circuitry. He is also the program admin- istrator for the UWB Capstone program. Dr. Berger is the author of two books on the subjects of computer architecture and embedded systems. Before coming to UWB he was an engineer and
. Garcia, M., Numers, Stephanie von, and Twamley, Erin (2014, May 8). Educated and Equipped: Energy & Manufacturing Training. Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved January 23, 2015 5. Tseng, Tzu-Liang Bill, Chiou, Richard, Mandal, Paras, Smith, Eric.D, Belu, Radian G and Salcedo, Oscar H. "Fusing Green Energy into Manufacturing Engineering Education to Cultivate Technical Success." 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014.6. Smith, R. T., and S. A. Melnyk. "Green Manufacturing: Integrating the Concerns of Environmental Responsibility with Manufacturing Design and Execution." Dearborn, MI: Society for Manufacturing Engineering (1996).7