plans, and other resources to properly equip teachers in order to helpthem overcome NE implementation barriers. Findings from this study can also helppolicymakers and stakeholders in creating a thriving environment for STEM education forteachers to successfully integrate engineering into classrooms.Bibliography[1] C. M. Cunningham, “Engineering is elementary,” The Bridge, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 11–17, 2009.[2] Ş. Purzer, T. J. Moore, D. Baker, and L. Berland, “Supporting the implementation of NGSS through research: Engineering,” NARST, Jun. 20, 2014. https://narst.org/ngsspapers/Engineering_June2014.pdf.[3] Ş. Yaşar, D. Baker, S. Robinson-Kurpius, S. Krause, and C. Roberts, “Development of a survey to assess K-12 teachers
easyreference. Some will even informally map the Bloom’s Taxonomy level of their learningobjective(s) to the ACL level(s).While there is no direct assessment of the effectiveness of the mind map (remember it is not aone-size-fits-all final objective document), much evidence has been relayed to the author of itsusefulness. Workshop participants that have advanced to facilitate their own workshops (inparticular, at their own institutions) have distributed and taught from the map. It is known thatWorcester Polytechnic Institute, Western New England University, University of Dayton, andLehigh University have used the map extensively and continue to distribute it to faculty who areapplying ACL for the first time.Finally, the map has shown to be a useful
by the initial interview protocol. Future work on this study will involve analysis of theexit interview to capture the full experience of the participants and assess the impact of the year-long research experience.References[1] J. Gentile, K. Brenner, and A. Stephens, Eds., Undergraduate Research Experiences for STEM Students: Successes, Challenges, and Opportunities. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2017. doi: 10.17226/24622.[2] A. L. Zydney, J. S. Bennett, A. Shahid, and K. W. Bauer, “Impact of Undergraduate Research Experience in Engineering,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 151–157, 2002, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00687.x.[3] Z. Ahmad and N. J. Al-Thani, “Undergraduate Research Experience Models: A
their self-reported attitudes and related actions.References[1] Simon Cassidy, “The Academic Resilience Scale (ARS-30): A New Multidimensional Construct Measure,” Front. Psychol., vol. 7, Nov. 2016.[2] S. Frezza and M. Mina, “On Competence and Virtue in Engineering and Computing Education,” in Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, Uppsala, Sweden, Oct. 2022.[3] Albert Bandura, Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: William H. Freeman, 1997.[4] W. Sunthonkanokpong, “Future Global Visions of Engineering Education,” Procedia Eng., vol. 8, pp. 160–164, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.03.029.[5] The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century
, and Research: The CASAR Project," 2014.[5] A. Kline, B. M. Aller, and E. Tsang, "Improving Student Retention in STEM Disciplines: A Model That Has Worked," presented at the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2011, p. 22.837.1-22.837.8. Accessed: Feb. 12, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/improving-student-retention-in-stem-disciplines-a-model-that-has- worked[6] S. T. Solansky, "Team identification: a determining factor of performance," J. Manag. Psychol., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 247–258, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.1108/02683941111112677.[7] O. Hargie, Skilled Interpersonal Communication: Research, Theory and Practice, 7th ed. London: Routledge, 2021. doi: 10.4324/9781003182269.[8] E
engineers and engineering.” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2004.[7] S. Carreño, E. Palou, A. López-Malo. (2010, June), “Eliciting P 12 Mexican Teachers’ Images Of Engineering: What Do Engineers Do?” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2010.[8] V. Pizziconi, S. Haag, T. Ganesh, L. Cozort, S. Krause, A. Tasooji, B.L. Ramakrishna, D. Meldrum, B. Lunt, A. Valdez, and V. Yarbrough (2010). “The P3E2 project: The introduction, implementation and evaluation of engineering design integrated across the middle school curriculum.” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2010.[9] S.Y. Yoon, M.G. Evans, J. Strobel. “Validation of the
, W. D. (2015). Programming Robots with ROS: a practical introduction tothe Robot Operating System. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".[11] Cañas, J. M., Perdices, E., García-Pérez, L., & Fernández-Conde, J. (2020). A ROS-based open tool forintelligent robotics education. Applied Sciences, 10(21), 7419.[12] Hur, B., Zhan, W., & Ryoo, B. Y. (2022). Integrated multidisciplinary capstone projects of an underwater robotand a quadcopter for building structural analysis. In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference.[13] Velamala, S. S., Patil, D., & Ming, X. (2017, December). Development of ROS-based GUI for control of anautonomous surface vehicle. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO) (pp.628-633). IEEE.[14] Megalingam, R. K
Paper ID #38891Creativity’s Role in Solving Ill-Structured Engineering Problems:Opinions of Student, Faculty and PractitionersXiangxiu ZhangSecil Akinci-Ceylan, Iowa State University Secil Akinci-Ceylan is a PhD student in Educational Technology in the School of Education at Iowa State University.Dr. Kristen Sara Cetin, P.E., Michigan State University Dr. Kristen S Cetin is an Associate Professor at Michigan State University in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.Dr. Benjamin Ahn, The Ohio State University Dr. Benjamin Ahn is an Associate Professor at The Ohio State University in the Department of Engineer
engines to conduct the project in two person groups and theavailability of small engine dynos to perform the performance testing. While conducting theproject the students found immediate interest in disassembling the engine and collecting data. Itwas observed that this interest helped the students stay engaged with the project and engage ingood in-class discussions.References 1. M. Regan and S. Sheppard, “Interactive Multimedia Courseware and the Hands-on Learning Experience: An Assessment Study,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 123–132, 1996, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1996.tb00221.x.2. M. Brereton, S. Sheppard, and L. Leifer, "How Students Connect Engineering Fundamentals to Hardware Design: Observations and Implications for the
. Barker, G. Welch, N. Grandgenett, C. Wu, and C. Nelson, “A Model of Factors Contributing to STEM Learning and Career Orientation,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 1067– 1088, May 2015, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1017863.[2] T. Andre, M. Whigham, A. Hendrickson, and S. Chambers, “Competency beliefs, positive affect, and gender stereotypes of elementary students and their parents about science versus other school subjects,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 719–747, 1999, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098- 2736(199908)36:6<719::AID-TEA8>3.0.CO;2-R.[3] J. Eccles, A. Wigfield, and U. Schiefele, “Motivation to succeed.,” in Handbook of child psychology, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1998
much less of its energy into mechanical motion than electricity; the average energy expended for gasoline is 0.805 MJ, while the average energy expended for electricity is 0.279 MJ [4].Test 3 - Performance Our third test was concerning performance. We would've accelerated the go-kart from 0-20 mph (and determined speed based on the rpm of the axle, which would be measured by the Arduino RedBoard) using solely the gas engine, and then done the same for solely the electric motor, recording the time needed for each. The table below shows the standard acceleration of gas and electric cars obtained from research [5] [6]. Gas Acceleration Gas Acceleration Electric Acceleration Electric Acceleration Time (s
2010. He is the director of the Sustainable Infrastructure Development, Smart Innovation and Resilient Engineering Research Lab at Morgan State UniversityNeda Bazyar Shourabi, Pennsylvania State University, Berks CampusAyodeji B. Wemida Ayodeji Wemida is a Masterˆa C™s student at Morgan State University. He received his Bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering with a focus on cybersecurity in 2018. As part of his commitment to learning and excellence, he has served as a tutor both on aDr. Mulugeta T Dugda, Morgan State UniversityDr. Jumoke ’Kemi’ Ladeji-Osias, Morgan State University Dr. J. ’Kemi Ladeji-Osias is Professor in the School of Engineering at Morgan State University in Balti- more. She is a rotating
:000330839100259. [Online]. Available: ://WOS:000330839100259[18] T. D. Forbes, "Queer-free majors?: LGBTQ + college students’ accounts of chilly and warm academic disciplines," Journal of LGBT Youth, pp. 1-20, 2020, doi: 10.1080/19361653.2020.1813673.[19] M. Greathouse, A. BrckaLorenz, M. Hoban, R. Huesman, S. Rankin, and E. B. Stolzenberg, "Queer-spectrum and trans-spectrum student experiences in American higher education: The analyses of national survey findings," Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, 2018.[20] oSTEM, "About oSTEM," oSTEM, n.d. [Online]. Available: http://www.ostem.org/.[21] NOGLSTP. "NOGLSTP is Out to Innovate." National Organization of Gay and Lesbian Science and Technical Professionals. https
ab ab t-L -L e s Pr PoFigure 2: Self-reported level of agreement with the statement “I am familiar with real-time RT-PCR” before and after the TDA experience.Despite being
obstacle to success of students in general and students from underrepresented inparticular. The study included 10 sets of questions. Each set included a question that did not useengineering term(s), another question that used engineering term(s), and finally a question testingwhether the participants understood the engineering term. The study also included questionsabout participants’ demographic background.The study was administered to 1st year engineering students in mechanical and civil engineeringstudents in their first semester at university level. The data was then analyzed to find differencesin student performance for questions with and without engineering terminology. Anothervariable of interest was the effect of students’ demographic
Paper ID #39007Efficiency Analysis of a Hybrid Solar System DesignRyan Thomas FlynnCaleb HoldridgeAlexandra MurphyMs. Jacquelyn Autumn Carter Undergraduate electrical engineering student at the United States Coast Guard Academy.Sarah SchollenbergerProf. Tooran Emami Ph.D., United States Coast Guard Academy Tooran Emami is a tenured associate professor of Electrical Engineering in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computing at the U. S. Coast Guard Academy (USCGA). Her research interests are control and power systems, particularly Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) controller design, robust control, time delay
remotely: the arduino student kit.” [Online]. Available: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iy4f2b6EhiEPEiOafAArVcs1aZPkusYh/view [3] Arduino, “Eduvision s3, ep.03: Crack our morse code!” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkpHdQkgvc8 [4] Z. Lu and K. Fitzsimons, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://sites.psu.edu/mehardwarekit/ [5] R. T. Shankar, J. Lapaix, C. P. Weinthal, D. Ploger, M. Augustin, and S. Aguerrevere, “Precision low-cost robotics for math education (work in progress),” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015, pp. 26–1242. [6] J. Yao, L. Limberis, and S. Warren, “Using portable electronics experiment kits for electronics courses in a general engineering program,” in 2011 ASEE
delivered over 100 talks inthese areas. He has successfully raised several externally funded grants of over $1.5 Million fromorganizations such as NSF, NASA, and the industry. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeastern Section ConferenceReferences[1] W. Tyson, R. Lee, K. M. Borman, M. A. & Hanson, “Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) pathways: High school science and math coursework and postsecondary degree attainment,” Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 243-270, 2007.[2] E. Bowen, J. Prior, S. Lloyd, S. Thomas, & L. Newman-Ford, “Engineering more engineers—bridging the
Conversations inHigher Education, 1(2), 176- 202.2. Jorgensen, S., Andrea Arce-Trigatti, J. Robby Sanders, & Pedro E. Arce. 2019.“Promoting innovative learning strategies: A collaborative curricular re-design at theundergraduate level,” Proceedings from the American Society for Engineering EducationSoutheastern Conference. March 10-12,2019. Raleigh, North Carolina.3. Oyanader, S., Luis Hevia, Andrea Arce-Trigatti, Stephanie Jorgensen, J. Robby Sanders,& Pedro E. Arce. 2021. “Role of the Graduate Student Mentors in the Successful Recruitmentand Mentoring of Underrepresented Minorities in STEM Research Initiatives.” Paper presentedat the 14th Annual Tennessee STEM Education Research Conference. January 16-17, 2021.[Virtual Conference due to
, customervalue, economic viability, etc.3. Performance of Entrepreneurial Mindset ProjectsConsider a class r of Nr students. Let gr, s be the project grade for student s in class r. Theproject grade average for class r is Nr 1 gr Nr g s 1 r, s (1)In class r, NA, r, NB, r, NC, r, ND, r
abstracts and/or full texts. It is equally valuable to examine potential motivations for thesepapers to simply mention Asian American students and what goal(s) these quick mentions serve.It is interesting to see that quite a few of these papers often address concerns of other minoritystudents, such as Latinx students or African American students, while at the same time equatingAsian students with white students. This again plays into the model minority myth, whichwrongly places Asians as the “standard” for what minorities “should” strive for [7] [8] [9][10]. At least 18 papers include language in their abstracts which equate Asian and whitestudents, thus contradicting the claims in other papers which cite Asian Americans as a minoritygroup. While
; • School name; • School district; • Grade(s) taught; • Subject(s) taught; • Number of students taught; • Need(s) for curricular improvements (needs); • Expectations from the program (expectations); • How will you disseminate what you’ve learned from this program; • What do you know about data analytics; Do you teach it now (knowledge); • Have you participated in a similar program; • Agree to participate in all activities; • Agree to participate in all program assessment surveys; and • Where did you learn about this program.In 2021, we received 20 applications and selected 10 participants. These applicants came from13 school districts and 19 schools throughout Arkansas, seen in Figure 1. Figure 1 shows
Paper ID #38057Board 202: A Preliminary Analysis of Identity Development in the FiguredWorlds of High-Achieving, Low-Income Engineering StudentsBethani Cogburn, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Doctoral candidate in Counselor Education & Supervision. Graduate Research Assistant with an NSF S-STEM sponsored program. Interested in creativity and equity in engineering education.Dr. Rachel Saunders, University of Cincinnati Dr. Rachel Saunders (she/her/hers) is an Assistant Professor of Counseling, responsible for serving as the track coordinator for the School Counseling Program. Licensed as a school counselor in the
implementingpedagogical strategies for differentiation, instructors can provide students with the support theyneed to succeed in introductory programming courses. While these practices are not novel, wenoted during our workshop that these strategies are effective in improving student engagementand learning outcomes. By adapting these practices to resource-constrained institutions, we canhelp realize a broader and inclusive computing community of learners.References [1] Y. Qian and J. Lehman, “Students’ misconceptions and other difficulties in introductory programming: A literature review,” ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2017. [2] K. L. Lewis, J. G. Stout, N. D. Finkelstein, S. J. Pollock, A. Miyake, G. L. Cohen, and
study.References[1] M.-Y. Lin, H. Chen, and H. M. Golecki, “HUG Initiative: Overcoming roadblocks on a research career roadmap of individuals from historically marginalized or underrepresented genders,” Front. Astron. Space Sci., vol. 10, p. 1134327, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3389/fspas.2023.1134327.[2] B. L. Yoder, “Engineering by the numbers,” 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/ publications/14_11-47.pdf[3] G. Potvin et al., “Gendered Interests in Electrical, Computer, and Biomedical Engineering: Intersections With Career Outcome Expectations,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 298–304, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1109/TE.2018.2859825.[4] M. W. Ohland, S. D. Sheppard, G. Lichtenstein, O. Eris, D. Chachra, and R
ent assignment tasksKeeps the group on track by reminding them of ASSIGN Ongoingtheir roles and the due dates along the way,including sending a message on teams a daybefore every due date to the person(s)responsible.Reviews Step 2 and uses it is a guide to select All In Class 10/17ONE Issue/Problem that the group will focus on and/or 10/19Submits this cover sheet to Canvas once ASSIGN 10/19completedBrainstorms design criteria without worrying if All In Class 10/19they are specific or testableEdits design criteria to make them All By
. 3, pp. 276–300, 2005.[2] G. M. Bettencourt, C. A. Manly, E. Kimball, and R. S. Wells, “STEM Degree Completion and First-Generation College Students: A Cumulative Disadvantage Approach to the Outcomes Gap,” The Review of Higher Education, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 753–779, 2020.[3] “About NSSE,” Evidence-Based Improvement in Higher Education. https://nsse.indiana.edu/nsse/about-nsse/index.html[4] M. W. Ohland, S. D. Sheppard, G. Lichtenstein, O. Eris, D. Chachra, and R. A. Layton. “Persistence, engagement, and migration in engineering programs,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 259-278.[5] S. Hopkins, J. Workman, and W. Truby, “The Out-of-Classroom Engagement Experiences of First
, Jun. 2021.[5] E. Douglas, G. Dietz, and E. McCray, “A narrative exploration of the in/authentic experiences of Black engineering interns (Work in Progress),” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[6] E. Anderson, K. Williams, L. Ponjuan, H. T. Frierson, and others, “The 2018 status report on engineering education: A snapshot of diversity in degrees conferred in engineering,” 2018.[7] J. Brooks, “Why Should I Care About Diversity in Engineering?,” National Society of Professional Engineers, Jul. 2020. https://www.nspe.org/resources/pe-magazine/july- 2020/why-should-i-care-about-diversity-engineering (accessed Feb. 10, 2023).[8] S. Brown, L. Flick, and K. Williamson, “Social capital in engineering
theprofessional identity development of internationally trained minority ECSW in engineering, andeducation, as they represent leaders in their fields, within and beyond academia.References:[1] L. Carlson, T. Portman, and J. Bartlett, “Self-Management of Career Development: Intentionality for Counselor Educators in Training,” Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education and Development, vol. 45, Sep. 2006, doi: 10.1002/j.2161-1939.2006.tb00012.x.[2] C. Cheng and S. Song, “How Early-Career Researchers Are Navigating the COVID-19 Pandemic,” Mol Plant, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1229–1230, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.07.018.[3] J. P. Martin and C. Garza, “Centering the Marginalized Student’s Voice Through Autoethnography: Implications
universities,” Ubiquitous Learning:An International Journal, vol. 3, no. 4, 173-184, 2011.[2] R. White-Clark, S. Robertson, and A. Lovett, “Using technology to bridge the interculturalgap in the classrooms of K-8 ENL students,” in Intercultural Responsiveness in the SecondLanguage Learning Classroom, IG Global, 2017, pp. 222-237.[3] J. Rizk and S. Davies, “Can digital technology bridge the classroom engagement gap?Findings from a qualitative study of k-8 classrooms in 10 ontario school boards,” SocialSciences, vol. 10, no. 1, 2021.[4] N. Bitner and J.O.E. Bitner, “Integrating technology into the classroom: Eight keys tosuccess,” Journal of technology and teacher education, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 95-100, 2002.[5] R.G. Muir-Herzig, “Technology and its